Breaking News

UK Government refuses to publish further COVID-19 Data because it suggests the Triple Vaccinated are developing AIDS & the Double Vaccinated are suffering ADE

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The UK Health Security Agency is refusing to publish any further data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccination status because previous figures show that the triple vaccinated population are on the verge of developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, and the double vaccinated are suffering Antibody-Dependent Enhancement.


The Exposé reports the facts the mainstream refuse to. Let’s not lose touch, subscribe today to receive the latest news from The Exposé in your inbox…

Follow The Exposé on Telegram
Join The Exposé’s Telegram Discussion Group


Back in October 2021, The Expose exclusively revealed how the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) data was showing that the Covid-19 injections has a real-world effectiveness against infection of minus-109%.

Not long after this, the UKHSA added a note to their reports stating ‘case rates among vaccinated and unvaccinated populations should not be used to estimate vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 infection

Click to enlarge

This was clearly done in response to our report, and also because they could no longer use their own data to show that the Covid-19 injections are effective. But it was perfectly okay when Pfizer used this exact method to falsely claim their mRNA Covid-19 injection was 95% effective of course.

Now, as we quitely predicted, the UKHSA have gone one step further, and have announced that they will no longer publish the number of Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths by vaccine status.

The reason?

The UKHSA claims this is because the UK Government has ended free universal Covid-19 testing and this therefore affects their “ability to robustly monitor Covid-19 cases by vaccination status”.

However, this doesn’t explain why they’re no longer able to publish the data on Covid hospitalisations and deaths. If someone is hospitalised with Covid-19 then we’re pretty sure the doctors and nurses are going to know about it, and if someone dies of Covid-19 we’re pretty sure a doctor is going to know about it.

There’s a good reason though as to why their excuse falls short, and it’s because they are lying. The UK Health Security Agency has been looking for an excuse for months to stop publishing the data because it clearly shows that the triple vaccinated population are on the cusp of developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), and the double vaccinated population are suffering Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED) and Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE).

The Evidence

The UKHSA claims that vaccine effectiveness wanes substantially over time and this is why it’s important to get a booster dose.

But this is a lie. Vaccine effectiveness doesn’t wane. Immune system performance does.

Vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of a vaccine, it is a measure of a vaccine recipients immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person.

Vaccines allegedly help develop immunity by imitating an infection. Once the imitation infection induced by the vaccine goes away, the body is left with a supply of “memory” t-cells and antibodies that will remember how to fight that disease in the future.

So, when the authorities state that the effectiveness of the vaccines weaken over time, what they really mean is that the performance of your immune system weakens over time.

A vaccine effectiveness of -50% would mean that immune system of the vaccinated is now performing at a worse rate than the natural immune system of the unvaccinated. It would mean the Covid-19 vaccines have damaged the immune system.

With that being said it should come as no surprise to anyone as to why the UKHSA no longer wish to publish the Covid-19 data by vaccination status, because it clearly shows in all areas that the Covid-19 injections are proving to have a negative vaccine effectiveness that is declining by the week, and therefore a negative immune system performance, which implies the fully vaccinated are developing Covid-19 vaccine induced Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.

The following table showing the number of cases by vaccination status between week 9 and week 12 of 2022, is taken from the UKHSA Week 13 – 2022 – Vaccine Surveillance Report, the very last report to contain figures on Covid-19 by vaccination status –

As you can see from the above, the triple vaccinated population accounted for the majority of Covid-19 cases in each age group by an extremely concerning amount, except for the under 18’s.

The highest number of cases in those four weeks was recorded among triple jabbed 50-59-year olds, with 210,265 confirmed cases. This compares to just 7,669 cases among unvaccinated 50-59-year-olds.

The UKHSA also used to conveniently provide the case-rates per 100,000 individuals by vaccination status in their vaccine surveillance reports, and the following table has been stitched together from the case-rate tables found in the Week 3, Week 7 and Week 13 Vaccine Surveillance Reports –

As you can see from the above the case-rates per 100k have been highest among the triple vaccinated population over these 3 months, except for the 18-29-year-olds in the week 3 report only, and the under 18’s in all 3 months.

However, it is worth noting the rapid decline in rates among unvaccinated children compared to the small decline in rates among vaccinated children. This suggests that in just a few weeks the case rate will be highest among triple jabbed kids. But now we’ll never know because the UKHSA is hiding it.

Now that we know the case-rates we can use Pfizer’s simple vaccine effectiveness formula to calculate the real-world Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness among the triple vaccinated.

Unvaccinated Case Rate – Vaccinated Case Rate / Unvaccinated Case Rate x 100

The following chart shows the Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness among the triple vaccinated population in England in the Week 3, Week 7 and Week 13 reports of 2022 –

Click to enlarge

This is nowhere near the claimed 95% effectiveness by Pfizer is it?

As you can clearly see the vaccine effectiveness has been falling month on month, with the lowest effectiveness recorded among 60-69-year-olds at a shocking minus-391%. This age group has experienced the sharpest decline, falling from minus-104.69% in week 3.

But one of the more concerning declines in vaccine effectiveness has been recorded among 18-29-year-olds, falling to minus-231% by Week 12 of 2022 from +10.19% in Week 3.

However, vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of a vaccine, it is a measure of a vaccine recipients immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person.

Using the case rates provided by UKHSA, we can also calculate the immune system performance. All we need to do is alter the vaccine effectiveness formula slightly for a negative immune system performance, and use the same formula for a positive immune system performance –

Positive Immune System Performance = Unvaccinated Case Rate – Vaccinated Case Rate / Unvaccinated Case Rate x 100
Negative Immune System Performance = Unvaccinated Case Rate – Vaccinated Case Rate / Vaccinated Case Rate x 100

The following chart shows the immune system performance of the triple vaccinated population in England by age group in four week periods, compared to the natural immune system of the unvaccinated population –

Click to enlarge

The lowest immune system performance is currently among 60-69-year-olds at a shocking minus-80%, but all triple vaccinated people aged 30 to 59 are not far behind, with an immune system performance ranging from minus-75% to minus-76%.

Even the 18 to 29-year-olds are within this region at minus-70%, falling from an immune system performance of +11.35% between week 51 and week 2, meaning they have suffered the fastest decline in immune system performance.

AIDS (acquired immune deficiency syndrome) is the name used to describe a number of potentially life-threatening infections and illnesses that happen when your immune system has been severely damaged.

People with acquired immune deficiency syndrome are at an increased risk for developing certain cancers and for infections that usually occur only in individuals with a weak immune system.

If that immune system performance was to hit around the -95% mark then this would strongly suggest the triple vaccinated population have developed some new form of Covid-19 vaccine induced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, and unfortunately based on the current trend seen over the past 3 months, the youngest age groups do not have long to wait.

But we won’t be able to officially confirm it because the UK Health Security Agency have decided to sweep it under the carpet and hide the official data.

That isn’t the only terrible outcome that the UKHSA are attempting to conceal though. Because UKHSA data also suggests the double vaccinated are suffering Antibody-Dependent Enhancement.

Antibody-Dependent Enhancement

The UKHSA have been trying to hide this revalation since the turn of the year, when they decided to stop publishing the rates per 100,000 for the double jabbed and instead only publish the rates for the triple jabbed.

The rates are calculated by dividing the total population size of each vaccination status group by 100,000; and then dividing the total number of cases, hospitalisations or deaths among each vaccinated group by the calculated figure.

e.g. – 3 million Double Vaccinated / 100k = 30
500,000 cases among double vaccinated / 30 = 16,666.66 cases per 100,000 population.

Questions were raised at the time as to why the UKHSA decided to stop publishing the rates for the double vaccinated, mainly because in the weeks prior they were beginning to look terrible for the double vaccinated population. But, as is usually the case, the UKHSA never provided a reason.

However, the UKHSA produces a separate report containing the overall population size by age group and vaccination status, meaning we can take these figures and actually calculate the case, hospitalisation and death rates per 100,000 among the double vaccinated ourselves.

Here’s the table taken from the Week 12 Influenza and Covid-19 Surveillance Report

The following chart shows the actual double vaccinated population size by age group on the 20th March 2022, based on the figures provided by UKHSA above –

Now that we know the population size all we have to do is divide each population by 100,000; and then divide the number of cases, hospitalisations and deaths by the answer to that equation, to calculate the case, hospitalisation and death rates.

The following chart shows the Covid-19 hospitalisation rate per 100,000 individuals by vaccination status between 28th Feb and 27th March 22. The unvaccinated case rate has been taken from page 45 of the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 13 – 2022, and the double vaccinated case rate has been calculated with the number of hospitalisations provided on page 41 of the same report –

the rates per 100,000 are highest among the double vaccinated in every age group except for the 18-29-year-olds. This data shows that all double vaccinated people aged 30 and over are more likely to be hospitalised with Covid-19 than unvaccinated people.

The following chart shows the Covid-19 death rate per 100,000 individuals by vaccination status between 28th Feb and 27th March 22. The unvaccinated case rate has been taken from page 45 of the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 13 – 2022, and the double vaccinated case rate has been calculated with the number of deaths provided on page 44 of the same report –

The death-rate per 100,000 is highest among the double vaccinated in all age groups excluding the 30-39 year olds where the death rate is the same as the unvaccinated, and the 18-29-year-olds where the death rate is lower. This data shows that all double vaccinated people aged 40 and over are more likely to die of Covid-19 than unvaccinated people.

If the rates per 100,000 are higher among the vaccinated, which they are, then this means the Covid-19 injections are proving to have a negative effectiveness in the real-world. And by using Pfizer’s vaccine effectiveness formula we can accurately decipher what the real world effectiveness among each age group actually is.

Pfizer’s vaccine formula: Unvaccinated Rate per 100k – Vaccinated Rate per 100k / Unvaccinated Rate per 100k x 100 = Vaccine Effectiveness

The following chart shows the real world Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation among the double vaccinated population in England, based on the hospitalisation rates provided above –

This data shows that all double vaccinated people over age 30 are between 0.2 and 2 times more likely to be hospitalised, with a minus-1% vaccine effectiveness among 30 to 39 year olds, and a minus-76% vaccine effectiveness among the over 80’s.

The following chart shows the real world Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness against death among the double vaccinated population in England, based on the death rates provided above –

This data shows that all double vaccinated people over age 40 are between 2 and 3 times more likely to die of Covid-19, with a minus-90% vaccine effectiveness among 30 to 39 year olds, and a minus-156% vaccine effectiveness among the over 80’s.

But why are most double vaccinated people more likely to be hospitalised, and more likely to die of Covid-19 than unvaccinated people?

Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease

Intensive research conducted by health experts throughout the years has brought to light increasing concerns about “Antibody-Dependent Enhancement” (ADE), a phenomenon where vaccines make the disease far worse by priming the immune system for a potentially deadly overreaction.

ADE can arise in several different ways but the best-known is dubbed the ‘Trojan Horse Pathway’. This occurs when non-neutralizing antibodies generated by past infection or vaccination fail to shut down the pathogen upon re-exposure.

Instead, they act as a gateway by allowing the virus to gain entry and replicate in cells that are usually off limits (typically immune cells, like macrophages). That, in turn, can lead to wider dissemination of illness, and over-reactive immune responses that cause more severe illness.

Of the information collated by Pfizer so far from the ongoing study they have conducted, it is plain to see that they are fully aware antibody-dependent enhancement is a possible consequence of their Covid-19 injection, and it looks like they may even know the consequence has killed people.

Pfizer, the company hit with the largest healthcare fraud settlement and criminal fine to date in 2009; which also happens to be the same company behind the first every mRNA gene therapy injection administered to the general public under emergency use authorisation in the name of Covid-19, has admitted in confidential documents, that it desperately tried to keep from going public, that its Covid-19 mRNA gene therapy may cause Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) attempted to delay the release of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine safety data for 75 years despite approving the injection after only 108 days of safety review on December 11th, 2020.

But in early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered them to release 55,000 pages per month. They released 12,000 pages by the end of January.

Since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents to their website. The latest drop happened on 1st April 22.

One of the documents contained in the latest data dump is ‘reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf’. Table 5, found on page 11 of the document shows an ‘Important Potential Risk’, and that risk is listed as ‘Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED), including Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Reporatory Disease (VAERD)’.

Vaccine-associated enhanced diseases (VAED) are modified presentations of clinical infections affecting individuals exposed to a wild-type pathogen after having received a prior vaccination for the same pathogen.

Enhanced responses are triggered by failed attempts to control the infecting virus, and VAED typically presents with symptoms related to the target organ of the infection pathogen. According to scientists VAED occurs as two different immunopathologies, antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and vaccine-associated hypersensitivity (VAH).

Pfizer claim in their confidential document that up to 28th Feb 2021, they had received 138 cases reporting 317 potentially relevant events indicative of Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease. Of these 71 were medically signifiant resulting in 8 disabilities, 13 were life-threatening events, and 38 of the 138 people died.

Of the 317 relevant events reported by 138 people, 135 were labelled as ‘drug ineffective’, 53 were labelled as dysponoea (struggling to breathe), 23 were labelled as Covid-19 pneumonia, 8 were labelled as respiratory failure, and 7 were labelled as seizure.

Pfizer also admitted that 75 of the 101 subjects with confirmed Covid-19 following vaccination, had severe disease resulting in hospitalisation, disability, life-threatening consequences of death.

But Pfizer still definitively concluded, for the purposes of their submitted safety data to the Food and Drug Administration, the very data that was needed to gain emergency use authorisation and make them billions and billions of dollars, that ‘None of the 75 cases could be definitively considered as VAED’.

But Pfizer then went on to confirm that based on the current evidence, VAED remains a theoretical risk.

This confidential data proves that the Covid-19 injections should never have been granted emergency use authorisation, and should have been pulled from distribution by the FDA as soon as they sighted the figures.

But the FDA failed to act, and that is precisely why the UK Health Security Agency has been looking for, and found an inadequate excuse not to publish any further data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccination status.

Share this page to Telegram
5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
53 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
gapag50893
gapag50893

.•♫•♬• 𝐈 𝐛𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 $𝟔,𝟎𝟎𝟎-$𝟖,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐚 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐡 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞. 𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐦𝐲 𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐣𝐨𝐛𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞, 𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐈 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝟏𝟎-𝟏𝟑 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬 𝐚 𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐤 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞. 𝐈 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐦𝐚𝐳𝐞𝐝 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐲 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐈 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐭…. •♬•♫•. HERE ➤➤ https://www.workbz.com

Last edited 1 month ago by gapag50893
NicoleLyman
NicoleLyman

I made $92/hr. It’s time to take some action and you can join it too.It is a simple, dedicated and easy way to get rich. Three weeks from now you will wish you had started today.Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site.
GOOD LUCK… http://Www.cashapp1.Com

Last edited 1 month ago by NicoleLyman
Richard
Richard
1 month ago

I am making $92/hour telecommuting. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $15 thousand a month by working on the web, that was truly shocking for me, she prescribed me to attempt it. simply give it a shot on the accompanying site… http://www.incomehd.com

Last edited 1 month ago by Richard
Paul Watson
Paul Watson
1 month ago

The sheep still won’t join the dots.
Experimental jab, Pfizer requesting 75 years to release safety data and now government going to hide the Covid deaths based on jab status.
“Nothing to see here, just my 4th booster please”

Can’t this data be obtained with a FOIA?

cefah
cefah
Reply to  Paul Watson
1 month ago

I make more then $12,000 a month online. It’s enough to comfortably replace my old jobs income, especially considering I only work about 11 to 12 hours a week from home. I was amazed how easy it was after I tried it…GOOD LUCK.. https://www.makemeboost.com

Last edited 1 month ago by cefah
Phillis Stein
Phillis Stein
Reply to  Paul Watson
1 month ago

We can choose to view these people in another way. Perhaps they are simply souls who came for the ride, but weren’t ready to move onto the next level of the “game”, so to speak, and they are expressing that choice via taking their jabs – which will temporarily exit them from the game. I think 3 or 4 people should get together and do regular FOI requests, and then put it all together.

Ryan
Ryan
Reply to  Phillis Stein
29 days ago

Interesting…sort of. Why would people exit the game using unkown substance that you’re insinuating those getting jabbed know something about the fact its nefarious but will take the risk or a slow death cause they want out? I think the more accurate analysis is the many people are like babies. They don’t know how to think for themselves and they are cowards. That’s the real score.

Nhanas
Nhanas
Reply to  Paul Watson
27 days ago

Arent you a sheep as well because you seem to beleive in this kind of dodgy websites 🤣

A Person
A Person
1 month ago

To show UK death rates over time, using the data provided by the UK Health Security Agency, here are 3 dates (i.e. 1) the first date they had data for, 2) the first date they had booster data for and 3) the last date they had data for before they stopped) I calculated for:

1) Supposed Covid virus deaths between week 35 and 38 2021 , within 60 days of positive PCR test (pg 17 of Week 39 report), ages 18-80+
815 – uninjected
2768 – fully injected (2 doses)
no booster data as no one in UK had been boosted at this stage

Using the graphs Google provides for poison statuses over time:
27.7% of UK uninjected, Sep 19, 2021 (around mid-point of time period)
66.2% of fully injected (% of 2 doses), Sep 19, 2021

Death rate (using Sep 19, 2021 date as a mid-point):
Uninjected: 815/27.7 = 29.42
Fully injected: 2768/66.2 = 41.81

Fully injected had a 1.42 (=41.81/29.42) times higher death rate than uninjected
……………..
2) Similarly, Week 3 (2022) report:

Death rate (using Jan 5, 2022 date):
Uninjected:  1145/22.8 = 50.2
Fully injected: 1836/19 = 96.6
Boosted: 1509/51.8 = 29.1

Fully injected had a 1.92 (=96.6/50.2) times higher death rate than uninjected but uninjected had a 1.73 (=50.2/29.1) times higher death rate than boosted
……….
3) Week 13 (2022) report:
Death rate (using Mar 17 date):
Uninjected: 319/21.6 = 14.77
Fully injected: 593/15.9 = 37.3
Boosted: 3054/57.4 = 53.21

Fully injected had a 2.53 (=37.3/14.77) times higher death rate than uninjected & boosted had a 3.6 (=53.21/14.77) times higher death rate than uninjected

CONCLUSION POINTS
By my calculations, even from the first time when the UK Health Security Agency started providing the data in Sep, 2021, the death rate for fully injected was 1.42 times higher than for uninjected and it gradually got worse and finished with a death rate for fully injected being 2.53 times higher than for uninjected by the time of the last report that included death rates for poison statuses in March, 2022.

Interestingly, when booster data first came out in January, 2022, uninjected had a 1.73 times HIGHER death rate than for boosted! However, this worsened as weeks progressed and by the last week in March, 2022, boosted people had a 3.6 times higher death rate than uninjected – even worse than fully injected had.

This suggested to me, from this data, that each injection:

1) does appear to give temporary defence against Covid/respiratory illnesses (though what it does for cancer and heart issue rates is another matter!) though that temporary defence may last for as little as a week or two

2) within a few weeks or months, an injected person’s defence to Covid/respiratory illnesses appears to become much worse than an uninjected person’s defence does – and boosted becomes worse than fully injected.

Last edited 1 month ago by A Person
Paul Watson
Paul Watson
Reply to  A Person
1 month ago

And if they die within 14 days of the shot they are classed as unjabbed, further distorting the real data.
Be interesting to see the effects of a 4th shot..

Last edited 1 month ago by Paul Watson
trackback
1 month ago

[…] April 17, 2022UK Government refuses to publish further COVID-19 Data because it suggests the Triple Vaccinated are… […]

ando49
ando49
1 month ago

I note the error under the chart of vaccine efficacy against death for the double jabbed. The negative efficacy starts in the 40-49 age group, not the 30-39 bracket.
Love this article. I believe it’s worldwide for Pfizer, even here in New Zealand.

Together we stand
Together we stand
1 month ago

Old news for the intelligent among us, it’s the idiots that still kling to the lies!

Covid
Covid
Reply to  Together we stand
26 days ago

Idiots like you probably. And the earth is flat

SOLO
SOLO
1 month ago

The bottom line is that there is a ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT RULING THE EARTH THAT’S TAKING ORDERS FROM THE DEVIL TO EXTERMINATE 95% OF THE PEOPLE ON EARTH. EVEN THE ZOMBIES HELPING THE DEVIL TO KILL EVERYBODY WILL BE MURDERED…

Phillis Stein
Phillis Stein
Reply to  SOLO
1 month ago

And I doubt any adults will feature among the 5%. Perhaps that is the number of children under 7, or something? Plus their goons, of course.

rachelPB
rachelPB
1 month ago

Big pharma and NIH push Remdesivir as treatment while killing patients with this drug. Dr Harvy Risch stated HCQ and Ivermectin have similar results and government and corporate corruption illegitimately cut it off from treament protocols. Dr Richard Urso also stated that even if HCQ and Ivermectin are blocked from doctors to use these medicines as treatment for Covid. Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://ivmpharmacy.com

Last edited 1 month ago by rachelPB
Phillis Stein
Phillis Stein
Reply to  rachelPB
1 month ago

There are other reason they don’t want people to have Ivermectin. First of all, it is off-patent for Merck and so is very cheap (or should be). Second of all, not only does it outperform anything they have on patent, but it works and is safe. Thirdly, if there are safe and effective drugs to treat covid, then the Emergency Use Authorization for the jabs should have been ended, because you only get EUA for jab if there are no effective and safe treatments available (this is the MAIN one really). And lastly, they’re actually realizing that Ivermectin could be a very effective cancer drug, and there are at least 8 studies on it that I know of. So, imagine if they lost EUA for vax AND more people deciding not to have chemo, surgery and radiation? Lots of funding and profits would go right out of the door. I mean it’s one thing to say “trust the experts” (which I don’t, by the way), but the next question we need to ask ourselves is – is that expert ethical, and do they care about ME? Most of them just follow along it appears to me – so we have a bunch of SHEEP for doctors! I don’t take medical advice from sheep.

Steven D Pallesen
Steven D Pallesen
Reply to  Phillis Stein
29 days ago

look up the definition of xper? Extreme programming.

Steven D Pallesen
Steven D Pallesen
Reply to  Steven D Pallesen
29 days ago

Fact is this duality, bi polar extremes, is a legalist DEATH culture sets our environment for war, climate is duress, nature predatory. Their AGENDA is the eradication and annihilation of human LAW LandAirWater these in complement one with another. They desire credit for all creation. So, these dissect Human LAW to replicate in their AI language.

trackback
1 month ago

[…] UK Government refuses to publish further COVID-19 Data because it suggests the Triple Vaccinated are… […]

Bob - Enough
Bob - Enough
1 month ago

Thank you for this article.

You must stop this nonsense about the imaginary virus though – Covid is the disease they are injecting us with NOT some imaginary virus that can be “found” by a stupid, not functional test. Unless people understand the true nature of so called viruses; big pharma will just carry on scamming them.

As for “Now that we know the population size all we have to do is divide each population by 100,000; and then divide the number of cases, hospitalisations and deaths by the answer to that equation, to calculate the case, hospitalisation and death rates”…. HAVE YOU EVERWONDERED WHY THE US / UK AND EU SUDDENLY WANT MILLIONS OF UKRAINIAN REFUGEES (AMONGST OTHERS ???) – THINK = OF WHAT YU STATED REGARDS POPULATION SIZE !!.

Phillis Stein
Phillis Stein
Reply to  Bob - Enough
1 month ago

Yep, and same thing happening in the US. It almost seems as if they are wheeling in replacement humans so the jig won’t be up too quickly, or at least until it is too late. Perhaps they are importing their future slaves? In the US, the illegal immigrants pouring across the border don’t have to be tested, don’t have to wear masks, and don’t have to be jabbed. So, what does that look like to you? Looks like some form of population replacement plan to me. You likely weren’t compliant enough, so you will simply be replaced in the herd with a better-behaved animal.

trackback
1 month ago

[…] April 17, 2022UK Government refuses to publish further COVID-19 Data because it suggests the Triple Vaccinated are… […]

Rupert
Rupert
1 month ago

Fantastic interpretation of the data. Why can’t the author get in touch with Neil Oliver and lets see this vital information be aired on GB news.

Janete Borawiak
Janete Borawiak
Reply to  Rupert
26 days ago

Mark Steyn on GB News has done a brilliant piece very similar to this. At last it’s getting out there

Lesley Shurlock
Lesley Shurlock
1 month ago

It shows what a good job you have been doing Exposé! You truly exposed the effects of the “vaccines” and the Government departments couldn’t produce any convincing lies to make their data seem to suport these execrable injections of murderous poisons. Their only response has ben to run and hide. Putting up such a feeble excuse at that! The UKHSA is one of the most evil departments in history, challenging Mengele’s outfit. They all have so many lives and so much inhumane human suffering to answer for.

Phillis Stein
Phillis Stein
Reply to  Lesley Shurlock
1 month ago

I understand many of your “government bodies”, hospitals etc. also took huge sums of money from Bill Gates. Many hospital administrators need to be jailed. Big Pharma needs to be prosecuted for massive fraud also. This should put paid to their ‘limited liability’ and then we can sink them for good. There is a NEW medical system coming that is not based on artificial chemicals, which are an inappropriate way of treating the body. We are so much more than mere chemistry. So, I’m hoping that this latest debacle should put paid the whole system we currently have. I’ve been waiting for this for a long time. Time to get back to nature and physics.

Phillis Stein
Phillis Stein
Reply to  Lesley Shurlock
1 month ago

And you are correct – when governments produce data that does not fit with their narrative; they HIDE IT. This happened to me once when I worked professionally in data (for a government) – I produced data correctly, and because the team I did it for had already provided INCORRECT data and MY correct data did not fit with what they’d already provided; the team simply hid my data and did not pass it on! Later, I was accused of not providing it to them, because they hadn’t published it, and I replied to the person that quizzed me about this that I had provided the data every month, on time every time. Fortunately, I could also prove that! The person that accused me was apparently let go! I stood my ground and I stood behind my results. So, I saw a LOT of what can go on in this space over the years. This is also why I can see through science studies and data very easily, and have a good idea of what is really happening. The Daily Expose has done an excellent job of bringing the data – thank you.

Phillis Stein
Phillis Stein
1 month ago

It’s a bit like the conventional medical system itself really – they do the same when they find a part of your body that is playing up, and they don’t know what to do with it, or how to heal it. What do they do? They cut it out! Looks like they’re trying to justify doing the same with INCONVENIENT DATA TRUTHS. We need to break the oligopoly in politics in our respective countries – likely at least the 2 major parties and probably the Greens too will be “captured” parties that have been infiltrated and basically operate as a controlled opposition. If people want their freedom, my advice would now be to vote for minor parties ONLY, and only those that have spoken out about the whole covid fiasco. If you haven’t got any of them (we have), then I reckon you should push for a new box on ballots that says “NONE OF THE ABOVE”! If EVERYONE did that, then we’d be on our way to freedom in no time. Kick out ALL politicians who haven’t spoken out in YOUR defence. If they haven’t – they are representing themselves, and they are certainly not representing YOU.

Phillis Stein
Phillis Stein
1 month ago

PHMPT = Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, and the link following this acronym contains the Pfizer documents on a website named the above acronym. Hope that helps? I didn’t know what it stood for and, IMO, acronyms should always be written in full and THEN abbreviated thereafter – or, at least that’s what I was taught at school. There – fixed it.

trackback
1 month ago

[…] UK Government refuses to publish further COVID-19 Data because it suggests the Triple Vaccinated are… The UK Health Security Agency is refusing to publish any further data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccination status because previous figures show that the triple vaccinated population are on the verge of developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, and the double vaccinated are suffering Antibody-Dependent Enhancement. […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] UK Government refuses to publish further COVID-19 Data because it suggests the Triple Vaccinated are… […]

trackback
29 days ago

[…] ziet mij hier schrijven over de actualiteit, van ‘Covid’, wat als onderwerp nog terug gaat komen, tot ‘Oekraïne’, waarbij ik puur rationeel tracht uit te vogelen wat waar is, en wat niet. […]

trackback
28 days ago

[…] 17. April 2022 The Expose: UK Government refuses to publish further COVID-19 Data because it suggests the Triple Vaccinated are… […]

trackback
28 days ago

[…] However, it is worth noting the rapid decline in rates among unvaccinated children compared to the small decline in rates among vaccinated children. This suggests that the case rate will be highest among triple-jabbed kids in just a few weeks. But now we’ll never know because the UKHSA is hiding it.’’ The Daily Expose reported. […]

trackback
25 days ago

[…] SOURCE SOURCE SOURCE SOURCE SOURCE SOURCE SOURCE1 SOURCE1 SOURCE2 SOURCE SOURCE SOURCE1 SOURCE2 SOURCE SOURCE SOURCE1 SOURCE2 SOURCE3 SOURCE4 SOURCE SOURCE […]

trackback
23 days ago

[…] diesen Jahres keine Daten mehr zu den Nebenwirkungen der „Corona-Impfungen“ veröffentlicht (Link). Bei den Briten war die Effektivität der „Impfungen“ bereits im Herbst letzten Jahres deutlich […]

truthshouldnothurt
truthshouldnothurt
23 days ago

These data are very important. We were warned before the “vaccines” (they are NOT vaccines) were given to the public that they would cause terrible problems such as ADE and they would damage people’s immune systems. Maybe people can’t bear to face the truth. When you’ve agreed to have something and ridiculed the people who warned against it, you’ll probably try to deny what’s happening when those warnings start to come true.
Please could someone from the Expose explain the “following table has been stitched together from the case-rate tables found in the Week 3, Week 7 and Week 13 Vaccine Surveillance Reports –” It doesn’t seem to be about numbers per 100,000.

Catherine Kratz
Catherine Kratz
14 days ago

Great and helpful analysis.
The release of the FDA file confirms the inefficiency of the Pfizer vaccin.
Thank you so much!

trackback
14 days ago

[…] UK Government refuses to publish further COVID-19 Data because it suggests the Triple Vaccinated are… […]

trackback
9 days ago

[…] vollständige Untersuchung der britischen Daten können Sie hier […]

trackback
7 days ago

[…] You can read our full investigation of the UK data here. […]

trackback
6 days ago

[…] You can read our full investigation of the UK data here. […]

Devon Seamoor
Devon Seamoor
4 days ago

Since I’ve got a handful of British friends that I’ve met in the villages where I’ve lived for almost 5 years, until March 11, 2020, I’ve been in touch with them on the phone on a regular basis. They’re all over 60 years old, and none of them can’t and won’t believe that vaccinated people get sick or enter the hospital after triple vaccination with diagnosis SARS-Gov-2. When I briefly mention the increase of sickness in vaccinated people, they say that this can’t be true, for none of that is in the papers or in the news. Therefore, it’s not true. Some of my friends have fallen silent, which is typical British, also. Any inconvenient news is pushed aside, preferably forgotten as soon as possible. The attitude in British folks was about the biggest disappointment for me, in those years abroad (I’m Dutch) I’ve found my friends narrow minded, with little general development, utterly naive, and they’re not alone, in Britain. Gosh, such a dumbed-down population!