Breaking News

Pfizer and Medicine Regulators hid dangers of Covid-19 Vaccination during Pregnancy due to Study finding increased risk of Birth Defects & Infertility

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

A ‘Freedom of Information’ request alongside an in-depth dive into the only pregnancy/fertility study performed on the Pfizer Covid-19 injection has revealed that Medicine Regulators and Pfizer chose to publicly cover-up alarming abnormalities of the developing foetus and falsely downgraded the actual risk of Covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy by suppressing documented findings of the clinical data.

These decisions led to medical professionals, who are far too trusting of Medicine Regulators, to wrongly inform pregnant women that the Covid-19 injections are perfectly safe during pregnancy, leading to many pregnant women feeling pressured to get vaccinated.

This fraud and deception has caused at least 4,113 foetal deaths due to Covid-19 vaccination in the USA alone, and a further study shows Covid-19 vaccination actually increases the risk of suffering a miscarriage by at least 1,517%.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here


According to the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC)) Vaccine Adverse Event Database (VAERS), as of 22nd April 2022, a total of 4,113 foetal deaths have been reported as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections, 3,209 of which were reported against the Pfizer injection.

The CDC has admitted that just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to VAERS therefore the true figure could be many times worse. But to put these numbers into perspective, there were only 2,239 reported foetal deaths to VAERS in the 30 years prior to the emergency use authorisation of the Covid-19 injections in December of 2020. (Source)

And a further study which can be viewed here, found that the risk of suffering a miscarriage following Covid-19 vaccination is 1,517% higher than the risk of suffering a miscarriage following flu vaccination.

The true risk could however actually be much higher because pregnant women are a target group for Flu vaccination, whereas they are only a small demographic in terms of Covid-19 vaccination so far.

But all of this pain and misery could have been easily avoided. Because it turns out both Pfizer and the Medicine Regulators who granted emergency authorisation for the Covid-19 injections, knew that suitable animal studies hadn’t been performed to determine the safety of the Pfizer vaccine during pregnancy but then falsely downgraded the risk.

They also knew the limited animal study that had been performed displayed a risk of significant harm to the developing foetus, but they actively chose to remove this information from public documents.

The information has come to light thanks to a ‘Freedom of Information (FOI) request made to the Australian Government Department of Health Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).

A document titled ‘Delegate’s Overview and Request for ACV’s Advice‘ that was created on 11th January 2021 was published under the FOI request. Page 30 onwards of the document shows a ‘review of the product information’, and highlights changes that should be made to the ‘Non-clinical evaluation report’ prior to official publication.

The changes were requested to be made by Pfizer prior to the next product information update, and here’s what some of those requested changes were as follows –

The Module 4 evaluator requested Pfizer remove their claim that “Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to reproductive toxicity”.

Why?

The Module 4 evaluator told Pfizer that ‘Pregnancy Category B2’ was considered appropriate and requested that they added the following line –

“A combined fertility and developmental toxicity study in rats showed increased occurrence of supernumerary lumbar ribs in fetuses from COMIRNATY- treated female rats”.

But here’s how the official document issued to the general public reads –

The pregnancy category was changed to ‘B1’, no line was included on the increased occurrence of supernumerary lumbar ribs in fetuses, and they instead included the line that was requested to be removed claiming “Animal studies do
not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy…”.

Your most likely wondering what ‘supernumerary lumbar ribs in fetuses’ actually are? And we will get to that, but first let’s concentrate on the pregnancy category.

Pregnancy Category B2, which was considered appropriate b the Module 4 evaluator is given when – “Studies in animals are inadequate or may be lacking, but available data show no evidence of an increased occurrence of fetal damage.”

Whereas Pregnancy Category B1, which was assigned in the publicly available official document, is given when – “Studies in animals have not shown evidence of an increased occurrence of fetal damage.”

That’s quite a big difference between the two categories. But the fact that the Module 4 evaluator even thought Pregnancy Category B2 was appropriate is highly questionable when you consider the results of the “inadequate” and extremely small animal study that was performed to evaluate the safety of administering the Pfizer Covid-19 injection during pregnancy.

The actual study can be viewed in full here and is titled Lack of effects on female fertility and prenatal and postnatal offspring development in rats with BNT162b2, a mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine.

The study was performed on 42 female Wistar Han rats. Twenty-one were given the Pfizer Covid-19 injection, and 21 were not. The Module 4 evaluator originally requested Pfizer include the line –

“A combined fertility and developmental toxicity study in rats showed increased occurrence of supernumerary lumbar ribs in fetuses from COMIRNATY- treated female rats”.

Here are the results of the study that the evaluator was referring to –

The results of the number of foetuses observed to have supernumerary lumbar ribs in the control group were 3/3 (2.1). But the results of the number of foetuses to have supernumerary lumbar ribs in the vaccinated group were 6/12 (8.3). Therefore on average, the rate of occurrence was 295% higher in the vaccinated group.

Supernumerary ribs also called accessory ribs are an uncommon variant of extra ribs arising most commonly from the cervical or lumbar vertebrae.

So what this study found is evidence of abnormal foetal formation and birth defects caused by the Pfizer Covid-19 injection. So why did Pfizer and the Australian Medicine Regulator not include this in the publically available official document after the Module 4 assessor had asked them to?

But the abnormal findings of the study don’t end there. The ‘pre-implantation loss’ rate in the vaccinated group of rats was double that of the control group, and not only was this information ignored, but no request was made to evaluate it further.

Pre-implantation loss refers to fertilised ova that fail to implant. Therefore, this study suggests that the Pfizer Covid-19 injection reduces the chances of a woman being able to get pregnant. So, therefore, increases the risk of infertility.

Despite scientific evidence proving otherwise, medicine regulators and Pfizer falsely claimed “Animal studies do
not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy”.

Sixty years ago, women were exposed to a new product for morning sickness called thalidomide and it led to at least 10,000 birth malformations. The above findings show that medicine regulators have learned nothing from this tragedy and took an unprecedented risk in their evaluation of the Pfizer Covid-19 injection.

That unprecedented risk led to an outrageous campaign of propaganda and lies targeting pregnant women, and pressuring them to take an experimental and unproven treatment. Despite the fact, authorities demand you avoid smoked fish, soft cheese, wet paint, coffee, herbal tea, vitamin supplements, processed junk foods… (the list is endless) when pregnant.

And that outrageous campaign of propaganda and lies has led to thousands of foetal deaths.

Share this page to Telegram
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Moira
Moira
1 month ago

Crimes against humanity.

Must be punished to the maximum extent of the law.

Phillis Stein
Phillis Stein
Reply to  Moira
1 month ago

And it also needs to be EVERYONE involved – if you aren’t thorough, then these things tend to happen AGAIN, just as they did post the Nuremberg trials, where too many were PERMITTED to escape punishment. We need a new type of “deep clean” this time, or we’ll come back to the same place in another 50 or 70 years when the next couple of generations of these families would do it again!

“History doesn’t repeat, but it sure does rhyme”
~ Mark Twain

nojate
nojate
1 month ago

 But to put these numbers into perspective, there were only 2,239 reported foetal deaths to VAERS in the 30 years prior to the emergency use authorisation of the Covid-19 injections in December of 2020.

Phillis Stein
Phillis Stein
Reply to  nojate
1 month ago

Which actually makes the current figures look as they are – FAR WORSE by several orders of magnitude over and above the total for this category over the previous 30 years. Interesting they only go back 30 years, but perhaps that’s because they’ve only had this system for that long. So, not clear why you were downvoted for merely repeating a sentence from the article. This comparison clearly shows us that jabs have been affecting children for up to 30 years already; thus, and paricularly with this being a completely untried and tested method of “vaccination” (which it wasn’t a vaccine). the companies and FDA should have done far more studies etc. to ensure it was going to be safe. The fact that it is showing itself to be EXTREMELY UNSAFE, and not just for pregnant women, AND the product HAS NOT BEEN PULLED FROM THE MARKET, is a disgrace, and further implicates everyone else involved, including complicit politicians, doctors, pharmacists, nurses and more into causing KNOWN harm to their fellow humans.

trackback
1 month ago

[…] – Pfizer and Medicine Regulators hid dangers of Covid-19 Vaccination during Pregnancy due to Study fin… […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Read more: Pfizer and Medicine Regulators hid dangers of ‘Covid’ Fake Vaccination during Pregnancy… […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Read more: Pfizer and Medicine Regulators hid dangers of ‘Covid’ Fake Vaccination during Pregnancy due to … […]

IRISH
IRISH
1 month ago

only the special dumbed down would get a vax while pregnant.

Phillis Stein
Phillis Stein
1 month ago

AND Cominarty wasn’t even the jab that was given to everyone, but it WAS the one that was fully approved. So, this raises a number of important points (or should do) all on its own.

Phillis Stein
Phillis Stein
1 month ago

We also need to urgently look into company law, because these companies have been literally getting away with murder for YEARS, and yet all they get is a slap on the wrist and a big fine. NOT good enough. So, what I’m saying here is that punishing individuals is not ALL that is needed here. Corrupt systems need to be taken down and remade in ways that will prevent anything remotely like this being perpetrated on humanity ever again. So, we need to look at mechanisms that will protect humanity into the future. I would prefer a massive lift in the collective consciousness, but since we don’t have that yet, we need to be very thorough – and, OBVIOUSLY, we need a new health system. Individuals being punished for their crimes is one thing, but it is the SYSTEMS that need to be examined and dismantled, because it is ultimately the system that permitted this to happen – clearly the ‘system’ wasn’t strong enough or built with those of the right consciousness.

trackback
17 days ago

[…] Unfortunately, medicine regulators around the world are fully aware of this but chose to actively cover it up, the evidence of which can be viewed in full here. […]

trackback
15 days ago

[…] Unfortunately, medicine regulators around the world are fully aware of this but chose to actively cover it up, the evidence of which can be viewed in full here.  […]

trackback
14 days ago

[…] Unfortunately, medicine regulators around the world are fully aware of this but chose to actively cover it up, the evidence of which can be viewed in full here. […]