Breaking News

FDA approve COVID Vaccine for 6-month-old Babies despite Data proving Vaccinated Children are 30,200%/303x more likely to die than Unvaccinated Children

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has questionably authorised emergency use of both the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 injections for use among children aged 6 months and above despite data from the UK’s Office for National Statistics revealing that children are 82 to 303x more likely to die following Covid-19 vaccination than children who have not had the Covid-19 vaccine.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here


On June 17th 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criminally extended the emergency use authorisation of the mRNA Covid-19 injections for use in children as young as 6 months.

There has never been an emergency in regard to Covid-19 infection among children. Two years of evidence show the alleged disease has only adversely affected the elderly and vulnerable. Children have been unlucky to suffer symptoms more severe than those associated with the common cold.

But despite this fact, the FDA has decided it is perfectly safe to administer an experimental injection to babies and toddlers, with FDA Commissioner Robert Califf saying –

“Many parents, caregivers and clinicians have been waiting for a vaccine for younger children and this action will help protect those down to 6 months of age.  As we have seen with older age groups, we expect that the vaccines for younger children will provide protection from the most severe outcomes of COVID-19, such as hospitalization and death.

Those trusted with the care of children can have confidence in the safety and effectiveness of these COVID-19 vaccines and can be assured that the agency was thorough in its evaluation of the data.”

The FDA Commissioner will live to regret that last sentence. As will any parent who takes the Commissioners words at face value. Because official data from the UK’s Office for National Statistics show that Covid-19 vaccinated children are between 8,100% and 30,200% more likely to die than unvaccinated children.

On 16th May 2022, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) published a dataset containing details on ‘deaths by vaccination status in England’ between 1st Jan 2021 and 31st March 2022.

The dataset contains various tables showing details such as, ‘Monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for deaths involving COVID-19’, and ‘Monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for non-COVID-19 deaths’.

Here’s an example that has been taken from table 2 of the latest dataset

As you can see, the ONS has chosen not to include children in the calculated mortality rates despite the fact children as young as 5 are now eligible for Covid-19 vaccination. They also grouped young adults as a group ranging from age 18 to 39, a period of 22 years, while all other age groups are a period of 10 years (40-49, 50-59 etc).

It’s things like this that make you believe they must have something to hide, and it turns out they definitely have.

Because on table 9 of the ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status’ dataset, the ONS have inadvertently provided enough details on deaths among children and teenagers by vaccination status for us to calculate the mortality rates ourselves, and they are horrendous.

Here are the figures published by the ONS in table 9 for 10 to 14-year-olds –

And here are the figures published by the ONS in table 9 for 15 to 19-year-olds –

As you can see, the ONS has given us both the number of deaths and person-years by vaccination status. This means we can perform simple math to calculate the mortality rates per 100K person-years ourselves.

All we need to now do is divide the person-years by 100,000, and then divide the number of deaths by the answer to that equation.

So for unvaccinated 10-14 year-olds we perform the following calculation to work out the all-cause death mortality rate –

2,684,874 (person-years) / 100,000 = 26.84874

164 (deaths) / 26.84874 = 6.1

Therefore, the all-cause mortality rate per 100,000 person-years among unvaccinated 10-14-year-olds is 4.58 deaths per 100,000 person-years between 1st Jan 21 and 31st March 22.

Now all we have to do is use the same formula to calculate the mortality rates per 100K person-years for all vaccination statuses among 10 to 14-year-olds and 15 to 19-year-olds.

Here are the calculated mortality rates by vaccination status among 15-19-year-olds based on the ONS calculated person-years –

And here are the calculated mortality rates by vaccination status among 10-14-year-olds based on the number of deaths and ONS calculated person-years –

These figures are horrifying. The ONS data shows that between 1st Jan 21 and 31st March 22, double vaccinated children aged 10-14 were statistically up to 39 times more likely to die than unvaccinated children, and double vaccinated teenagers aged 15-19 were statistically up to 4 times more likely to die than unvaccinated teenagers.

But it’s the triple vaccinated figures that are truly frightening when it comes to children.

The ONS data shows that between 1st Jan 21 and 31st March 22, triple jabbed children aged 10-14 were statistically 303 times more likely to die than unvaccinated children of Covid-19, 69x more likely to die of any cause other than Covid-19 than unvaccinated children, and 82x more likely to die of all-causes than unvaccinated children.

This suggests that three doses of a Covid-19 injection increase the risk of all-cause death for children by an average of 8,100%, and the risk of dying of Covid-19 by an average of 30,200%. Whilst two doses increase the risk of all-cause death by an average of 3,600%.

But as things currently stand it’s the other way round for teenagers. Two doses of a Covid-19 injection increase the risk of all-cause death for teens aged 15 to 19 by an average of 300%. Whilst three doses increase the risk of all-cause death by an average of 100%.

The figures for children though, are in fact even worse than they first appear. This is because the unvaccinated mortality rate among 10-14-year-olds includes children aged 10 and 11 who were only offered the Covid-19 injection from the beginning of April 2022, despite the UK Medicine Regulator questionably granting emergency use authorisation for it to be administered to young children in late December 2021.

Whereas the vaccinated mortality rates include only a handful of 10 and 11 year-olds. We know this from the fantastic news that only 7% of 5 to 11-year-olds have had the Covid-19 injection as of 14th May 2022.

Therefore, if the Covid-19 injections were not causing the untimely deaths of children then we would actually expect to see a mortality rate that is lower among the vaccinated population than the mortality rate among the unvaccinated population, not a mortality rate that is similar, and certainly not a mortality rate between 8,100 % and 30,200% higher.

The statistics are horrendous, but it’s important to remember that behind those statistics are real people who are suffering and who have lost their lives, and unfortunately this time around they are children. Children who have never been in danger of suffering serious complications due to the alleged Covid-19 disease. Therefore, children who have never, ever needed an experimental, poor-performing, deadly (these statistics prove it) Covid-19 injection.

Share this page to Telegram
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Moira Richards
Moira Richards
15 days ago

This should I show you how corrupt and dangerous these people are do not inject your babies with a substance that can kill them

Gareth Hawker
Gareth Hawker
15 days ago

How to calculate how deadly the vaccine may be.

I have greatly admired the posts on The Exposé for over a year now.. However I think the way the data has been dealt with in this article is not correct. This is a pity, because the data is extremely important. I shall explain why I think this:

On twitter I had posted about the ONS age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for England in the 40-49 age group in Feb 2022. A tweeter pointed out that the such figures do not provide the full data that is needed.

I had thought that, as The Expose seems to think, the age-standardised mortality rates were an adequate indication of how deadly the vaccines were. However the critic pointed out the following.
____________________________

“What you want to test your hypothesis is two numbers.

(A) % vaccinated in general population

(B) % vaccinated in dead population …

if A>B vaccines save lives.
You can work out B from your dataset and A is publicly available. Happy hunting”
_____________________________

I replied:

“Thanks for your suggestion. I made the calculation as best I could. For that age group, vaccination did appear to save lives: 95% versus 87%. However, I was not confident in the original data and I found that the validity of that data had been criticised.”

_____________________________

The criticism comes from several highly qualified academics.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357778435_Official_mortality_data_for_England_suggest_systematic_miscategorisation_of_vaccine_status_and_uncertain_effectiveness_of_Covid-19_vaccination

In another paper, they went even further.

Quote:

“A variety of factors could have led to deaths in the first 14 days being omitted in the ONS dataset, including miscategorisation, reporting lags and recording, data handling or transcription errors.
The dataset is therefore corrupted, making any inferences about vaccine efficacy or safety, reliant on the data, moot.

The ONS should therefore publicly withdraw their dataset and call for the retraction of any claims made by others that are based upon it.”

:End of quote

https://www.hartgroup.org/first-tranche-of-missing-vaccine-deaths-found/

I believe this is a better way to deal with the ONS data, so suggest that The Exposé considers adopting it.

2SQN1CSR
2SQN1CSR
15 days ago

It has been my experience that the vaccines were recommended as safe and effective by the Canadian government with no limiting factors including religion or health exemptions. The first thing authorities did when people started dying “expectedly” is that they made exceptions and excuses for the vaccine.

Example, for the first 14 days after injecting, death by vaxx wasn’t even a consideration even for those who collapsed and died at the scene in a bloody mess or stroked soon afterward.

If there were “extenuating” circumstances that relieved the shot of it’s lethal responsibility they should have bloody well been viewed and actioned before not after the injection. The Trudeau government and provincial governments were inhumanly relentless in their media campaign and completely unsympathetic it its view of the recently injected dead.

Society should be demanding it’s pound of flesh from the government, pharmaceuticals, and media. They pushed it relentlessly and should suffer the consequences of killing so many people. It’s madness to suggest the shot had nothing to do with it and it’s safe. We can’t even be sure of what was injected into who but one thing is for sure, how many died afterward in very horrible ways.

The Canadian government at all levels is the very definition of banality of evil!

trackback
14 days ago

[…] proving Vaccinated Children are 30,200%/303x more likely to die than Unvaccinated Children – https://expose-news.com/2022/06/20/fda-covid-vaccine-babies-data-303x-more-likely-die/ – “The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has questionably authorised emergency […]

trackback
14 days ago

[…] Read More: FDA approve COVID Vaccine for 6-month-old Babies despite Data proving Vaccinated Children… […]

trackback
14 days ago

[…] Read More: FDA approve COVID Vaccine for 6-month-old Babies despite Data proving Vaccinated Children… […]

trackback
14 days ago

[…] FDA approve COVID Vaccine for 6-month-old Babies despite Data proving Vaccinated Children are 30,200… The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has questionably authorised emergency use of both the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 injections for use among children aged 6 months and above despite data from the UK’s Office for National Statistics revealing that children are 82 to 303x more likely to die following Covid-19 vaccination than children who have not had the Covid-19 vaccine. […]

Bob
Bob
14 days ago

This is one giant intelligence test. The stupid moms will give their babies the shot and many of them will die.

Gemmy
Gemmy
5 days ago

This article was very hard to find. I typed the title into the Expose search and it found nothing. I typed it into Brave search and it did not come up. Finally I found it referenced and linked on freerepublic.com The way I knew about it was seeing it in somebody’s video. Please check you search or whatever needs to be done so people can find this important story, and thank you Expose for all you do.