Breaking News

Letter to the Editor: Magna Carta Used in Unfair Dismissal Suit Against the State of New South Wales, Australia

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Scott White is using the Magna Carta in his unfair dismissal legal battle.

Next week, White has a directions hearing at the New South Wales Industrial Relations Commission (“IRC”).  A directions hearing is a hearing at which the court, or in this case the employment tribunal, considers what has happened so far in a case and issues instructions in the form of directions about what should happen before the next court/tribunal hearing. 

His IRC claim states:

I am a ‘free man’, a sovereign living soul & man; protected by Natural Law and the Common Law Constitution. As a free and sovereign living soul and man I am endowed with God-given rights that cannot be denied or removed; answering only to the supreme power and divine creator.

The Peoples Security Clause is Article 61 of the Magna Carta. Clause 61 ensures the ruling Crown upholds the Constitution. If it is breached, the aggrieved party, the people, can rise up against it via ‘Lawful Rebellion’ to restore inalienable rights and freedoms until remedy is established.

To his claim, White attached a video link of the Right Honourable Lord Igor Judge, former Chief Justice of England and Wales, explaining Clause 61 of the Magna Carta 1215.  Lord Judge is the co-author of the book ‘Magna Carta Uncovered’.

The Rt. Hon. Lord Judge explains the basis of Article 61 (2 mins)

White’s full claim is an empowering read. We encourage all our readers to open the document attached to his latest letter to us (below) and take the time to read it. Scott White is a fighter with the heart of a lion.  We’re rooting for him and hope he’s able to keep us updated as to how he is getting along.

Before we get to his latest letter, a brief background to his case. In a previous letter, White described how his employment was terminated by Corrective Services New South Wales (“CSNSW”) for exercising his right to refuse vaccination.  Almost a year later, CSNSW did an about-face stating “staff members will no longer be required to be vaccinated against Covid-19 as a condition of employment.”

Shortly after this u-turn, White wrote to the Manager of Employee Relations for the Department of Communities and Justice (“DCJ”) New South Wales: 

I was informed that employees that were dismissed for not being injected will be offered reemployment for their positions NOT reinstatement thus attempting to create a legal loophole of responsibility for Employees dismissed unconstitutionally, unlawfully, illegally, unethically and unreasonably.

This is a blatant attempt to not compensate the 1% of CSNSW employees’ back pay that questioned the validity of the ‘vaccine mandate’ policy. It is also a disingenuous attempt by CSNSW to obviate responsibility for the harm its actions and policies have created.

We published his correspondence with the DCJ HERE.

Now we turn to his latest action.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

To The Exposé,

Magna Carta 1215 and Medical Freedom

I have submitted the document below referencing the Magna Carta as part of my unfair dismissal claim against the NSW DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES AND JUSTICE.

I have a Directions hearing before the INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NSW on the 9th of November.

I have submitted over 60 similar documents over the past year to either CORRECTIVE SERVICES NSW or DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES AND JUSTICE or the INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NSW.  I have also sent over 500 emails with many questions. Nothing I have submitted has been responded to.

What the NSW Government did do is report me to the NSW Mental Health Department. When I proved that it was the DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES AND JUSTICE that gave my private information to the NSW MINISTRY OF HEALTH stating that I was a danger to myself and others they refused to discuss the matter.


Scott White

If you would like to publish a letter, please email it to addressed “Letter to the Editor.”  At the end of your email, please indicate the name or pseudonym you would like shown when we publish your letter.

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
10 months ago

Thanks for the update Scott.
I’m sure your resolve will achieve the result it deserves.
Best Wishes.

Richard of the Family Leschen
Richard of the Family Leschen
10 months ago

Dear Sirs and or Mesdames,
Regarding this case of Steve White using Common Law of 1215 of 15th June Runnymede England for his case in NSW Australia in his lawful challenge above.

I am a longtime student of Common Law for some years now, and only use the word “UNALIANABLE” when I go to court.
The meaning off Unalienable is far stronger than Inalianable as it cannot be changed at any time, as it is under Gods Law/s and applies to Common law which is God’s Law, brought about by the senior Church men and the Barons of England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 in 1215 AD on the 15th of June. at Runnymede in England.
I always ask the judge or the magistrate for their Bonding Certificate and their Writ of Commission before they try me for some alleged speeding offence, or alleged parking offence. I ask these two questions of them only three times and if they refuse to give me proof that they have these certificates on them for me to see, I holler for the Sheriff and he then removed said judge or magistrate from the court.
I then state politely that I am the highest officer in the court and dismiss the case agains me and leave he court. It works ever time.

Richard of the family Leschen

AUssie pub` crawler
AUssie pub` crawler
10 months ago

Bill of Rights/1689 gives AUssies the right to own guns…..

Reply to  AUssie pub` crawler
10 months ago

Agree, but with caveat; said person must be protestant and a subject of the Commonwealth. My document also states that it has not been superseded, nor can be(?) made void. “Non Obstantes Made Void” I am not a lawyer but I am fairly sure I understand this. And I am a Protestant.
No guns, but pitchfork is sharp.

10 months ago

I stand with Scott White. May the Lord God speed and expedite his victory over tyrrany.