About a week ago, Igor Chudov came across a Substack titled ‘Boostershots’. When he investigated, he discovered that Boostershots was the coordinating site of a “viruses do not exist” psychological operation (“psyop”). The site instructed people how to post on forums promoting the “no virus” theory and the Substack’s author(s) even bragged about getting people worked up about it.
We’re not saying everyone who posts “viruses do not exist” comments are part of this psyop, but what we are saying is that people need to be mindful that those who run psyops will infiltrate all sides of a debate in order to take control of the narrative to serve their purposes. At all times, we need to take care and assess what we read and watch with wisdom and discernment, not only in corporate media but also on social media, independent media, blogs and citizen journalist sites.
Also remember that just because certain words are repeated over and over again, it does not make them true. In fact, psyops use repetitive slogans – “build back better” comes to mind – to influence behaviour and perceptions. But as soon as we ask, for example, “Build what? Better than what?” the slogan falls apart. One indicator a statement is at least credible is whether it can withstand scrutiny – a repetitive slogan “viruses do not exist” providing no further information does not pass the scrutiny test, just as with the example of “build back better.” Another indicator is to look, for example, at the social media profile of the person commenting or posting to try to assess whether they appear genuine or not.
Further reading: The Ultimate Guide to Psychological Operations (Psyops), Intelligence 101, 19 February 2021
Below is an article by Igor Chudvo explaining how he uncovered, by chance, this particular “viruses do not exist” psyop.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
“VIRUSES DO NOT EXIST” was a Substack Psyop – and a Nice Try!
By Igor Chudov
Remember how very many Substacks were beset with numerous comments claiming that VIRUSES DO NOT EXIST?
A lot of Substackers, myself included, responded to these claims. I even started a DEBATE that received 1,663 replies and was very lively.
Read more: DEBATE: Viruses do not exist? Or do they? Igor Chudov, 5 September 2022
Very many other Substackers provided interesting, informative, insightful, at times, emotional writeups on this topic. This includes A Midwestern Doctor, Steve Kirsch, Stephanie Brail, James Lyons-Weiler, Meryl Nass, Amy Sukwan, and more. (Please let me [Igor Chudov] know who else posted on this topic prior to today, whose post garnered at least 20 comments, and I will add it to my list).
To some people, the insistence that viruses do not exist seemed odd as the “no virus” theory contradicts almost every person’s life experience of getting infected with viruses, such as chickenpox, and acquiring immunity. As a tolerant person, I have no problem with people believing in whatever they want, so the debate I started was an opportunity to learn from each other.
Psyop from BoosterShots Substack
About a week ago, I searched DuckDuckGo for my name just to see what was up and saw something weird that attracted my attention. It was a Substack site boostershots.substack.com (archive link).
This is his logo:
It turns out that Boostershots was the coordinating site of the psyop and instructed people how to post on forums promoting the “no virus” theory. The author(s) even bragged about getting people worked up about it, about my debate, Steve Kirsch etc.
The instructions to followers go on:
therefore, i believe it will be helpful to provide the best plausible explanations for all of the most popular “diseases” from the perspective of terrain theory that new free thinkers could rightfully question or challenge. (and we must honestly admit uncertainty and adhere to the continuous pursuit of truth and the scientific method if we don’t fully understand something yet).
so here’s the idea: i’d like to create a sort of “common sense ‘germ theory’ vs ‘terrain theory’ pamphlet”
the boostershots news team is seeking to hire experienced researchers, editors, graphic designers, and meme lords. we will pay you with vodka, picked herring, and indecision.
while i was only slightly peeved when i discovered that both “level 1 igor chudov” and “level 2 steve kirsch” had revealed themselves as germ believist mercenaries, i was absolutely fucking LIVID when i would later discover that my most admired “level 3” substack hero is pulling the same exact bullshit.
This went on for a while, but it looks like the author abandoned his or her attempts to run this psyop as of 26 September 2022.
The instructions are highly educational for anyone attempting any psyop.
Why Did the “No-Virus Psyop” Fizzle?
However, this psyop fizzled. Why? In my opinion, this entire operation was an attempt to hitch a cart to a dead horse (“no virus” theory), flog this dead horse, and get the cart going. The dead horse did not go very far, and that explains why the Boostershots campaign was abandoned eventually. The “no virus” theory is not exactly new (it predates the virus theory), and it never went very far in the last 100 years, on or outside of Substack.
Our own anti-vax campaign is a great counterexample: we have a multitude of opinions, can handle disagreement, our thoughts are constantly sharpened by these disagreements, and broad truth is behind us. Our “horse” is very much alive!
Last Note to All Virus Deniers
Dear virus deniers: While I firmly believe that viruses exist, I also would like to reiterate that each of you, including people Boostershots explicitly mentioned, is a welcomed reader of my Substack, and I love to hear your future opinions about anything!
Also, I am not mad in any way at anyone. It was a nice try. It was fun while it lasted, and the whole story was an interesting attempt of a likely young individual to run their personal and very harmless operation. It provides us with much food for thought and shows an anatomy of an influence operation colloquially described as a “psyop”. Nobody was hurt in the end.
Featured image: Information Warfare: Pakistan’s Deadly PsyOps Campaign on India, 10 September 2019
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help..
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
.
Can you please help power The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful journalism for the years to come…
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
such as Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal
are trying to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
Categories: Breaking News, World News
This sounds a bit like you are trying to control the narrative… The fact that virology ‘isolation’ techniques do not follow the scientific method should be greatly concerning, explanations of how this process is done can be found on podcasts featuring people such as Tom Cowan, Stefan Lanka and Alec Zeck amongst many others. Considering The Expose is willing to look into the fraud and corruption within the government it seems very odd that this topic is seemingly viewed as ‘out of bounds’ in the realm of questioning and critical thinking.
Totally agree. This appears to be information control.
Agree. Chudvo’s article smells like a psyop. I’d like to see Chudvo seems to avoid engagement with the serioius issues Drs Kaufman, Cowan and others have been raising.
Ah, the cognitive dissonance is hard to overcome…
Said in a reasonable way Lauren S, you question, which is what we should all do. Sadly, think you can see it was used in a disgusting way by the filth who want to control the agenda. Not your fault in any way.
People like me still work in the good faith/integrity way, look out for comments from people such as myself, who seek to promote fairness and discussion. There are many attack dogs on this site, who promote the agenda of the filth and want the destruction of true humans.
I thought you were all about free speech!
You just lost me. You obviously are not at all educated enough to be taking sides on a subject you know nothing about.
What else has this site sold the public was fact when really fiction.?
Very simply i ask you 1 question,
If 1 billion infected you would assume someone has sampled and stored this virus right? Please find it.
Until then, santa clause, the tooth fairy and easter bunny have no less evidence they exist than corona virus.
Please prove me wrong. Prove us all wrong.
In the mean time you might want to study dr robert o youngs work.
He not just another indoctrinated bot who only follow protocols, he an expert in his field, in blood , for over 40yrs.
I dout there is anyone with more knowledge alive today
It’s not just this virus, the rest are missing, too.
https://davidicke.com/2022/02/04/right-now-canadian-activist-christine-massey-talks-truckers-trudeau-virus-isolation/
Dr Robert O Young indeed maybe the best professional on living blood and he proved a couple of things. He proved the corona effect – dying cells and cell debris but virus… He proved (recording under microscope) that bacteria is shape-shifter, you could watch a red blood cell to turn into bacteria which – again – a proof of terrain theory.
Dr Susan Humpries proved that the tetanus bacteria turns to harmful only if it is closed from air, also proved (based on about 100 years research and notes on tetanus) that it vaccines doesn’t work either but if you have tetanus while being vaccinated your survival chance is almost 0. If you have it unvaccinated your survival chance is 47% – a bit better isn’t it?
The lies are not exclusively are about viruses, living things (the so called germs) work very differently in a petri dish and in their living, normal environment (eg. us)
There are two more videos I kindly suggest to watch to everyone who are interested.
One is The Death of Germ Theory
the other is Dr Lee Merritt Inteveiw: “VIROLOGIST DR. POORNIMA WAGH WITH DR. LEE MERRITT: “IT’S NOT JUST VIROLOGY THAT’S A SCAM. MOST OF PATHOLOGY IS ACTUALLY FRAUDULENT.” “PEOPLE ARE WAKING UP VERY QUICKLY.” “I THINK THIS IS THE BEGINNING OF A TSUNAMI.””Both are on the Truth Comes to Light site which is by the way an excellent source of these type of information while remaining professional and publishing quality material from ‘everyone’ including Dr Lanka or La Quinta Columna.
Imagine the wasted billions spent on gain of function of unexisting viruses.
All for nothing !
It’s even deeper than that.
Have a look pls if you think, it will be two images – the summary of the content but he said much more.
Those who are interested in genetics also should watch.
Followed by… – according to these, the PCR is fake, what we thought we know about genes are fake, too. This is really sinister.
And if I understood it well, he just uncovered the mRNA tale, too. There is no mRNA ‘treatment’ as can’t be, but correct me please if I misunderstood him.
It looks to me like the EXPOSE is being exposed by its very sharp commenters. That is why I never donated. My heart skips a beat every time I see the comments that I hope to see with such an article like this. I just want to add: You can’t prove a negative. Those who claim that something exists must be the ones who provide proof. This has never been done scientifically.
I won’t hold my breath for the EXPOSE to provide proof of the existence of any virus.
Also Pleomorphism is what happens inside the body when the body heals itself and returns to homeostasis. Every single second that we’re alive our body’s intelligence is working a special biological program to detox and repair anything that is amiss in the body. It brings/creates its own tools and our tissue changes into bacteria, fungi and what people call “virus” as part of the internal process to return back to homeostasis. At different stages of this process we experience “dis”ease and an alteration in our blood and tissue. Not to fret. The body knows what it is doing. And modern medicine suppresses every step of this process thus preventing a full return to good health.
You can weight the evidence and see which hypothesis is supported. Carry on wearing your tin hat though. 🙂
Viruses have been isolated genetically, antigenically, with electron microscopes, and in functional plaque assays millions of times. The requirement that someone must also isolate them molecularly is an anachronistic, semantic, expensive and irrelevant point.
We don’t have to isolate a box of pure computer virus to know that computer viruses exist.
We can only make copies of viruses by putting them in cells which use all the same chemical elements and much of the same coding and proteins. Separating out the viruses from 100,000 similar chemicals to get purity is possible but expensive and scientifically pointless.
We isolate them with plaque assays, antibody tests, electron micrographs, PCR analysis, contact tracing, symptoms, blood tests for D-Dimer, Cytokines, blood oxy levels, etc etc etc. We do binding tests on various subparts of the virus with ACE2 TMPRSS2 and nuclear transport proteins, etc etc etc. See Nextstrain to get some idea of how much data they can’t explain. (Mouseover and then double click the dots on Nextstrain to see more data).
At a young age, I succumbed to this disease. I was part of the 0, clinically died twice yet survived. (kind of. severely disabled by brain insult due to loss of 02) I was fully vaccinated for this disease at the time.
To be honest, one of the last things I remember before taking ill was being given an oral polio vacc. Doctors at the time could not find any source of disease. (injury,cut et-cetera)
Agree with every comment posted by you I have read, so far.
And now I am an old-ish man. Speech not real good, but.
Thanks for sharing your wisdom.
Thanks, sorry for the different nick, from time to time I am unable to post anything as Gundel as it’s ‘waiting approval’.
There are no comments by you that I have had to approve. And there are no comments by you waiting for approval. In other words, no comments are pending approval. A comment you made immediately previous to the one I’m replying to here, I have deleted. I’m sure you’ll understand why.
Not to take anything away from Dr. Young, but he didn’t prove cells were shapeshifters, Dr. Gaston Naessens did decades ago. https://adistantmirror.com/gaston-naessens-somatid-and-somatoscope/
After reading Dr. Young’s claims about his microscope, I contacted him, asking how his microscope differed from Naessen’s Somatoscope. His reply was garbled drivel.
Here is a 10 year old video about the Somatoscope.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udaxsKNPKL8
Thought you were interesting and had some integrity GundelP, until u either lost the plot or were just a stooge all along.
Interested why The Expose make it so hard for me to post a comment like that, when you post so easily.
My mind is open and i don’t miss much.
You just lost me. You are obviously experiencing a threat to your current beliefs as you aren’t coherent. At all.
I know some people want to believe viruses are not real. It would be comforting. I applaud everyone who questions assumptions, but not those who don’t want to learn any genetics or virology. There are billion observations that can’t be explained with the hypothesis that viruses don’t exist. I just keep pointing at the data. Isn’t that what science is?
Viruses have been isolated genetically, antigenically, with electron microscopes, and in functional plaque assays millions of times. The requirement that someone must also isolate them molecularly is an anachronistic, semantic, expensive and irrelevant point.
We don’t have to isolate a box of pure computer virus to know that computer viruses exist.
We can only make copies of viruses by putting them in cells which use all the same chemical elements and much of the same coding and proteins. Separating out the viruses from 100,000 similar chemicals to get purity is possible but expensive and scientifically pointless.
We isolate them with plaque assays, antibody tests, electron micrographs, PCR analysis, contact tracing, symptoms, blood tests for D-Dimer, Cytokines, blood oxy levels, etc etc etc. We do binding tests on various subparts of the virus with ACE2 TMPRSS2 and nuclear transport proteins, etc etc etc. See Nextstrain to get some idea of how much data they can’t explain. (Mouseover and then double click the dots on Nextstrain to see more data).
There’s a billion observations that already fit the hypothesis that viruses are real. The hypothesis that all viruses are fake explains none of them…
https://joannenova.com.au/2022/06/weekend-unthreaded-417/#comment-2561474
The Expose went down in my estimation aseveral months ago when they published a rediculous video of an Indian woman claiming her “team” could find no mRNA in the Covid Vaccine. I complained and got no response They shamelessly solicit money and have never provided Financial Statement.
This article from Igor goes someway to restoring credibility
She was not the only one not to find that mysterious mRNA but only non biological materials like the graphene.
Look into her ‘credentials.’
More scientifically illiterate guff from Rhoda Wilson and the Expose team:
“At all times, we need to take care and assess what we read and watch with wisdom and discernment, not only in corporate media but also on social media, independent media, blogs and citizen journalist sites.”
A notable absence from that list is biomedical science journals which “virus believers” obviously don’t bother reading or maybe they lack the intellect to understand. I read them daily and have been doing for over 30 years. If you were capable of taking care and assessing virology with wisdom and discernment you would understand that no credible proof has ever been presented for the existence of viruses.
Viruses are defined as replication competent, obligate intracellular pathogens, consisting of whole genomes surrounded by protein and lipid antigens, that cause transmissible disease. If anybody thinks they have proof of any of this, then go ahead and post it here.
A skin rash (chickenpox or measles) affecting different individuals at the same time does not prove any of the above. Yawning is “infectious” and nobody blames a virus for that!
The “concerned reader” who is supported by the Expose team continually returns to the belief that genetic sequences entered into online databases that claim to be viral in origin must be viral. Because they say so. He apparently has no idea about the unscientific methods used to generate those sequences. Perhaps his vested financial interest in a biotech company prevents him from understanding the unprofitable truth.
I have never heard of the substack “boostershots” and i speak from over 30 years’ experience as a biomedical scientist including 8 years of NHS diagnostic testing for “viruses”.
“a repetitive slogan “viruses do not exist” providing no further information does not pass the scrutiny test.”
This is disingenuous rubbish as very detailed analysis and entire books worth of further information have been provided by those that have actually bothered to engage with the “science” of virology.
“The “no virus” theory is not exactly new (it predates the virus theory), and it never went very far in the last 100 years, on or outside of Substack.”
The Perth group of scientists and doctors would beg to differ on this point. The only reason that some believe it “never went very far” is because of the censorship and smearing used to promote the lucrative vaccine/antiviral drug industry in the MSM.
“Dear virus deniers: While I firmly believe that viruses exist..I love to hear your future opinions about anything!”
Religion is about belief. Real science is about what can be proven and disproven so “virus believers” post your evidence and prove what you claim. Belief is not good enough.
Well said “yawning is infectious” , so is laughing! Viruses do not exist…period.
Outside of God’s written word, contagion, virus transmission is man’s only explanation for how illnesses spread and people get sick. Whereas God is “upholding ALL things by the word of His power.” Hebrews 1 :3. Mark, not SOME things!
“virus transmission is man’s only explanation for how illnesses spread and people get sick.” = maybe it was, but I do not think it is now, to many of us.
Even regards the Covid nonsense, the dumb masses now realise that being locked in their houses, wearing a face mask, separated from loved ones, sport, a social life WAS BAD FOR PEOPLES HEALTH AND MADE THEM ILL (mentally and physically) – maybe that is the crux of “selling” the terrain theory.
But I would add that my latest bee in my bonnet (apart from Everton being BS) is that these thousands of diseases / illness that we have named (to sell drugs) are comprised of symptoms – many of them common between the named illnesses.
I mean just look at this for the CDC symptoms of Covid -what a crock of ambiguous cat litter) =
Possible symptoms include:
This list does not include all possible symptoms. Symptoms may change with new COVID-19 variants and can vary depending on vaccination status.
Well said: “crock of ambiguous cat litter” Who would disagree?
Yep, and yet none of what you are calling out (obvious mainstream Pharma lies) is added to by believing the earth is flat. Excuses me, viruses do not exist.
Why the flat Earth nonsense reference ?, why di you bring that stupid subject into the conversation ?.
Talk with forked tongue, you have double the chance of it being cut off. (sorry, but that last bit is good, I just made it up, impressive hey ?).
I brought it up to juxtapose it to this conversation as I find them remarkably similar. It definitely is a bit of a cheap shot though.
Nice saying! Props for the creative and poignant phrase! 🙂
“. Yawning is “infectious” and nobody blames a virus for that!“
and laughing also ‘infectious’ and the drive behind women’ menstrual cycle is also. 🙂
To those who are interested in the subject, the best educational but also very easy to understand videos in the subject are from spacebusters (channel) look for it on odysee.
If you want something more sophisticated but less entertaining then go for Dr Kaufman’ videos eg. The Rooster in the River of Rats, or Dr Cowans, or Dr Sam Baley’s (she is entertaining enough and beautiful to mix the useful with pleasure)
By the way dr Stefan Lanka made a CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT, what virologists never made demonstrating how fraudulent is the virus-isolation process and it is not isolation at all (to separate something from everything else)
https://truthcomestolight.com/the-path-paved-by-dr-lanka-exposing-the-lies-of-virology/
The menstrual cycle syncing thing doesn’t happen. It can seem that way sometimes, but only as each woman’s period can last a different number of days and the cycle itself can last a different number of days – plenty of room for overlap. https://helloclue.com/articles/cycle-a-z/do-menstrual-cycles-sync-unlikely-finds-clue-data
Thanks, I’ll check but my personal experience dictated otherwise.
Thanks humbly for your great work. I am currently researching effects of disturbances in the electrical/magnetic medium (radio frequency radiation and beyond) and am constantly being surprised by the similarity of symptoms of the aforementioned with flu et-cetera.
If you are the person I think, I have been greatly educated by your knowledge of the medical field, and you are one of the few that I take info from. I consider you and your like trusted sources, having nothing to gain, only to lose. Thus passing the most critical of all tests, motive.
I chose Radio long ago to keep my aging mind active, as radio is also electronics, math, and LOGIC. My learning continues in the biology field thanks to the much study you and a very few others have undertaken. And shared.
I think the time has come for the Expose’ to share the truth and overcome all prejudice. And do an article other than dis/mis information by one knowledgable on this subject.
Again, thanks.
Thank you for your kind words. Im not sure i am the person you think i am but you are right about me having no motive to lie. I have been speaking out for a long time and that has caused me some problems. I have written several articles for the Expose but they have not published my most recent one exposing the virus scam as they seem committed to this false narrative now. Good luck with you research.
‘Real science is about what can be proven’
Funny there are so many scientific theories then, eh? And only a few laws?
Do you believe in Evolutionary theory? Do you hold it to the same scrutiny as Virology? Because there is actual evidence that contradicts that theory. Unlike your stance.
There’s a billion observations that already fit the hypothesis that viruses are real. The hypothesis that all viruses are fake explains none of them…
https://joannenova.com.au/2022/06/weekend-unthreaded-417/#comment-2561474
Well put. Simple and true.
I would give 0 star if I could. This article is the psyop itself.
As I suspected, no real opposition would publish and article like this, the agenda, camps, compulsory vaxxes depends on the belief of viruses to orchestrate a new ‘pandemic’ (of some kind of poison(s), e-smog included.)
People go to Truth Comes to Light to follow the BIG virus debate with proofs (tons of proofs) showed.
Hi GrundelP, I have deleted one of your comments as you are simply on a roll of trying to demean The Expose – again – making repeated negative comments and false accusations. I have had to point this out to you on more than one occasion before. But you are reverting to your mantras (as if it is a campaign) of trying to influence readers against The Expose, from not reading or supporting our articles. This is how a troll behaves.
We are not here simply for your entertainment and so you can post derogatory remarks when you are having a bad day or disagree with an article. If you have a case against what the article is saying, by all means, comment. But to go into attack mode, against The Expose or me, for posting it will not be tolerated. You are not trying to argue the message, you are attacking the messenger.
As I have warned you about this more than once. From now on, I will delete any of your comments that are trying to influence others to view The Expose negatively. The world is much bigger than you or your views.
I have asked this question before and since you feel you the same way as you did many many months ago I feel I have to ask again – if you think so badly of The Expose, why are you still not only following us but also very active on the site?
You deleted the proof Rhoda. The comment with the photo (proof) with Christine Massey FOI request has disappeared – one of the strongest proof.
I’d rather observe your behavior and contemplate how to break through the cognitive dissonance.
what you refer to as a virus is actually the H5N1 vaxxxine which was probably the 1st case outside china which used the current HIV spike venom protein which is in all the vaxxes.
you can also find out the same information with “Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (split virion, inactivated), suspension for injection in pre-filled syringe” and note the web address on the medicines . org website.it seems people fail to understand that when you inject items into the blood, larger than the vessels can eject, then those items will stay in the system.
tell me, wheres your sample group for your conspiracy believe?
Go up 1 post -it is repeated.
Where is the comment with the photo about the FOI requests collected by Christine Massey Rhoda?
Hi Gundel, I don’t know. If it was included in a comment that insults, unnecessarily, The Expose I may have deleted it, as I have explained to you. Do you have a second profile on the site using the name of GunDelete?
Sorry, Rhoda. You had this coming.
Since when ‘unnecessary trolling’ to give the details, concerns on similarly dubious PsyOp like auricles like this? This is not the first, the list which was the base of opinion to smell ‘rat’ was also deleted.
The Expose published articles with graphs ‘proving’ that you are better with one covid shot than 0. Trolling, really?
You yourself tried to find the good in the possible worst, transhumanism, that at least you could charge your cell phone in the middle of nowhere without battery – and many more.
I also dared to think that the daily fear porn ‘you will die if you are vaccinated’ without sure proof is very dangerous conditioning.
As about the rest, the moderation rules (a link to x site allowed today, forbidden tomorrow) makes one to publish the same content several times to find out what’s wrong with the ‘mood’ of the software? today.
Interestingly the countless Ponzi-scheme (I earn a fortune, click – like comments didn’t count trolling, they could stay)
As about commenting here – I should thank your team to giving platform to correct mistakes and pointing out additional info, research, truth. This is the only reason, when commenting becomes impossible the site won’t worth to open it as it stands.
Hi Whatever, you may want to revisit the articles you’re misquoting.
Maybe Expose News can publish an article describing how viruses have been isolated and present evidence that they are the cause of illnesses
Right! Isn’t that the crux of the matter? We got off to a bad start with the criminal Pasteur and his bogus research, and Be’Champ was ignored. You can also read, “Good-Bye Germ Theory” by Wiiliam P. Trebing. Analogous situation is, Einstein banishing, abolishing the Aether to prove Big Bang theory. We are waking up Expose’, you’re defending a lie to subjugate humanity, but humanity no like subjugation!
Check out Steve Kirsch’s substack. Its pretty simple and clear.
Even you could understand it if you tried!
Steve Kirsch was handed his own bum on a platter in an intelligent, logical debate by Patrick Gunnels. I won’t leave a link but this can be found on bitchute.
This debate needs to be seen by more people, IMHO.
The truth is the one thing left standing after the lies, misconceptions, prejudices et-cetera are revealed. And, the truth shall set us free.
“what we are saying is that people need to be mindful that those who run psyops will infiltrate all sides of a debate in order to take control of the narrative to serve their purposes.”
Absolutely! I personally lean to terrain rather than germ theory, because of using high quality resources which suggest to me terrain theory is more credible. Fast approaching 70 but the last time i experienced physical dis-ease was Xmas ’19. The symptoms fitted in with what’s labelled Covid, it felt like a nasty cold/mild flu to me. Instead of taking medication, i just got my head down and mainly slept for a couple of days. What’s interesting is my symptoms coincided with the rollout of 5g in the area.
Said this in earlier comments here at The Expose, the filth know co-opting strong beliefs from any end of the spectrum is a highly successful tactic. Please don’t be daft enough to help them by defending their tools, there must be substantial evidence to suggest a theory has legs.
This is an old saying/adage which i think has timeless merit:
“Love many, trust a few, always paddle your own canoe”.
Your first paragraph is, IMHO, incontrovertible!
Like your last sentence also, absolutely agree with you.
May I suggest a good book, although I suspect you have already read it, The Invisible Rainbow, by Arthur Firstenberg?
You are definitely a person i’d love to share time with =)
And from your comments, reciprocate. Expose’ has my permission to pass my email address on to you.
I feel sure I could learn much from you, and maybe even have a gem or two for you. Wish you well, be nice to hear from you.
High quality resources like Cowan? Promoter of structured water, charms, and your ‘5G causes Covid’ theory? Does the South Korea rollout of 5G fit your theory? Or do you just look for data that confirms your beliefs? 🙂
Thank you for the downvotes without a response to the data from South Korea. It validates my premise. 😉
Thomas S. Cowan’s book The Truth About Contagion is meticulously researched and contains extensive bibliography.
Tom is MD, book is co-authored by Sally Fallon Morell.
More qualified than I, and I also suggest, you. No offence meant. Just sayin’.
This is outrageous, and to think that I have just subscribed to a monthly donation to “save the Expose”!. I am withdrawing my subscription forthwith. The onus is on medical science to prove that they DO exist, something which they have totally failed to do. “Viruses” (aka “poisons”) are just a pretext for a range of idiopathic syndromes, and should remain so until proven otherwise. For the Expose to publish this is an unforgivably crass thing to do when it’s very existence is under threat, or is that just an assertion too?
Do not pull your subscription please, otherwise I cannot comment anymore if it goes “breasts up”.
However I have to state that this is the most bewildering and insane article a site like the “Expose” could put up, after these past few years – especially to people who view the so called alt-media.
You didn’t ‘listen’ then. There were a couple of more if even not on a so straightforward way. Plus the last nanotech article didn’t allow comments. This one ‘Scientists suspect Covid Vaccines contain Graphene & Nanotech that is damaging the Immune System & causing Cancer’Suspect??
There are proofs like the report of Dr Campra, findings of La Quinta Columna and many more, but if you can’t comment you can’t direct attention to the proofs so it remain a forgettable suspicion.
I am so curious that what’s the Expose explanation for the MAC phenomenon and magnetism of the vaccinated? mRNA? Spike protein? Snake venom? (Just a couple meant for diversions from graphene.)
Finished, sorry, this article was just too much.
I do not think I responded to you, did I ?
But…what part of my comment do you not understand ?…. “However I have to state that this is the most bewildering and insane article a site like the “Expose” could put up, after these past few years – especially to people who view
the“this site as a” (<insert) so called alt-media.”I just do not want him / her to pull the subscription, because then MAYBE I will have to chip in as I thought I made clear.
Bewildering = “extremely confusing or difficult to understand”
Insane = “exhibiting a severely disordered state of mind”
Hope that clarifies matters.
As for “Finished, sorry, this article was just too much.” … ON THAT WE CAN AGREE FULLY.
Out foxed by fellow strugglers-two points above the drop zone-do you think Lampard will go the same way as Gerrard anytime soon?
Good comment!
If “Dominic Calvert-Lewin” could get into form, we may have something… we have nobody to put the ball in the back of the net.
For me, better to watch the games this season than the last 10 combined, but we just do not get the goals or results (you know that small problem !!), so I think we should keep the Southern **** for now.
You’re picking bones with the only article i’ve known The Expose not to allow comments on WE.
Go enjoy the myriad of stuff which never allows them, think that’s more your thing.
I am here to learn new things, how can I learn if not able to ask questions? Or see other’s comments?
Never suggested censorship Merv, just the ability to promote views by strategic upvoting is probably harmful.
Apologies, agree on the censorship thing. To be honest, I have trouble understanding what the vote has to do with the proverbial “price of eggs”.
Thanks for the info, not being computer savvy I thought it was something I had done wrong regarding comments on graphene article.
I also listen to La Quinta Columna, as they have no motive for the findings they have uncovered. And therefore have no skin in the game.
Hi William, did you read the article? The article is about the other side hijacking and creating narratives for their own purposes – running a psyop using a theory a lot of people follow (no virus theory which, and most people don’t realise this, is not the same as Terrain Theory) . If you think about it, the purpose is to intially divide and conquer and then possibly in the long run to discredit the very theory they claim to support. Unfortunately, the divide and conquer is certainly working.
From a personal point of view, not that it matters as I’m not on a crusade (I have no problem people having different views to myself and I also don’t think exposing any of these theories are going to stop their plans in their tracks), I think all of Germ Theory, Terrain Theory and no virus theory are, to some degree, psyops. I think the anti-human agenda is controlling the narrative of all three.
Spot on Rhoda!
Was going to post this in reply to another comment, now think this the best place to post my reasoning.
Think The Expose should stop allowing up/down voting of posts, the filth seem to be using them to fulfil their agenda, really don’t think genuine opinion is reflected.
If people disagree with what’s said, let them explain why to the person who posted the comment.
Definitely something i’d enjoy but think it more likely to rid the site of so many harmful comments. Idiots can’t explain their stupid with fair challenge.
Stuoidity! Human error, not stupidity =)
Almost crying with laughter, stupidity! Hope you human error police are ok now.
How about publishing an article by Dr. Sam Bailey, one of the few that have thoroughly studied this subject, thus allowing an open and honest debate?
Is it because…..? None of what could be inserted on the dots is very nice, so I shall leave blank.
The truth should not be a threat to any honest persons, IMHO.
And yet Sam Bailey won’t debate or take up an active $1M offer at 5 to 1 ratio… >)
I am on a “crusade”, the one to find the truth behind as much as my compromised mind will allow. However great or small.
And I believe the onus is upon the ones who claim something exists to prove such. Not on those who question the existence of, for instance, the boogieman.
And God’s work, as best I understand, is to separate the wheat from the tares. And for this subject we absolutely require honest and open debate from BOTH sides, free from name calling, shooting the messenger, et-cetera. And I am convinced that we have all heard enough from one side only. Fair?
Here in Aus most support the underdogs. Or that is how I have been raised. So, my admission of bias. Let the one without sin cast the first stone.
They have been isolating much smaller things. Why can’t they isolate a virus? Until they do, viruses are considered a hoax
And so are bio weapons based on gain of function research !
Dr Sam Bailey recently has uncovered the bio-weapon hoax, she also pointed to that we torture countless animals during experimenting.
https://truthcomestolight.com/bioweapons-bs-the-lab-leak-narrative-virologys-ongoing-cruel-pointless-torture-massacre-of-animals/
You do a lot of good, but this is the worst I’ve seen from you. Ironically, one cannot use science to prove the accepted ideas of virology. If you think you can, you have not studied the situation enough. Also, the antis are NOT going away or decreasing in number. Indeed they are higher than ever.
All people need to see and understand is (2 mins) = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsqhwXfn2IU
PS I have posted it before, so sorry for repetitiveness)
One cannot use science to prove the accepted ideas of virology? That is a classic control freak statement. I can use science and you cannot deny me that right – much as you would like to. Furthermore I have used it and I have proved it – many times in the expose..
But proof is never accepted by Activists however convincing, Proof is accepted by Scientists if sufficiently convincing, the people who you would deny the use of their subject. You sound very like Ayatollah Khomeini. He denied Newton’s laws and forbade them taught at university.
Dare you to watch anything on the subject by Dr Sam Bailey.
Please, prejudice has no place in a learning persons world.
And that may be why the article submitted by Dr. Sam was not published.
Why does my watchtower verion change the word of god from “holy kiss” to holy handshake? We must be more prudent.
No proof given? Deluded or prejudiced? Not for me to judge.
Newton had heretical views on the blessed Trinity, but more than this he was an occultist. Gravity has never been proven (nor can it be)-for it is based on false science. The earth is not a planet, spinning ball, globe; no, it is geocentric. Heliocentrism is a false theory.
I am a creationist, so would I teach evolution if I ran my own school? I trow not!
And there it is- the flat earthers align well with the viruses don’t exist- is it gullibility? Is it desire to be above others? Not sure.
But any flat earther should be able to prove their theory with a hot air balloon. Hasn’t been done, oddly.
You have, IMO, it bum about. (180 degrees out)
Copernicus, in his day followed scientific principles instead of the mass following dogma of the church of the day. Need I point out how modern day scientism equates to the masses blindly following their “religion?”
Not going to enter the FE thing, although I have looked into it, it doesn’t follow my observations in spite of having some valid arguments.
Merv,
The Earth isn’t completely flat-for there are mountains, hills, valleys and plains all over the face of the Earth. The Earth is geocentric, not heliocentric, the Roman Catholic (satanically) inspired Copernican doctrine of heliocentrism came about through what became known as the Hegelian Dialect (thesis, antitheses and synthesis) and Galileo had his part in this.
I don’t know why this comment of mine came out like this-but I’m off to bed.
> One cannot use science to prove the accepted ideas of virology?
That’s what I said.
> I can use science and you cannot deny me that right – much as you would like to.
You can use whatever you want. I don’t care — but science it ain’t.
> Furthermore I have used it and I have proved it – many times in the expose.
No doubt in your own mind this is true.
You must be very gullible to fall for the virology scam. In your case, I would say it’s a matter of militant obtuseness.
Hi Gerald, please don’t use insults to try and win an argument. If your point can stand on it’s on and withstand scrutiny – it shouldn’t need propping up by attempting to demean, demorolise or insult others.
Interesting that his insult to me was OK.
Sorry, I didn’t see that. I’ll take a look now …
Hi Gerald, I’ve had at what I think was his comment to you you’re referring to. I think I might be missing something or looking at the wrong comment because I don’t see any name calling etc. Can you enlighten me?
I sound like Ayatollah freaking Khomeini?
I don’t care, actually. Tough skin, but that was a stupid thing to say.
No place for abuse, name calling et-cetera.
And yet you allowed clear instructions on how to elecrocute ones-self. (Ando, or similar, further down in comments) This is dangerous and mephistophelean, IMO.
As stated by you, the argument should stand on it’s own.
Hi Merv, I haven’t seen that comment. Do you know which user name made it?
Hi Rhoda, sorry for not getting back sooner.
Comment by ando49.
Well put, no ‘proof’ is going to be enough for those that have been conned by this PsyOp.
Don’t know if many here remember The Kenny Everett Show but i’m detecting much “Disgusted of Tonbridge Wells” in the majority of comments.
Rhoda isn’t claiming terrain theory is wrong, she’s merely pointing out a seeming psyop regarding terrain theory. Her real point is these tactics are used to discredit ideas which the filth don’t approve of.
Sure The Expose would welcome submission of articles which RATIONALLY explain competing ideas. However, don’t expect them to be published if they ‘re mainly a rant, rather than logical reasoning.
Thank you.
Re-read it a few times and don’t see owt to froth about in your article Missy. Almost seems like a psyop is happening in the comments, to create a rather nasty, false narrative.
Truly saddens me to see how many fall in line with it.
There is no article from / about Stefan Lanka or Dr Kaufman, or nowadays Dr Yeadon (who has joined to the deniers), or Drs Baleys, or Dr Cowan, or Ms Massey or Dr Volmer, or Dr Young (just a couple of deniers in the sea who hardly get any platform for truth) or the doc who injected ‘HIV’ (blood) into himself in front of cameras twice – to prove that HIV caused AIDS was also a hoax .
The other side is not represented.
Personally hold all 3 you mention in high regard WE, seen many of their interviews, also saved a lot of them.
Erm, the first 3 =)
This is a multi trillion dollar industry we are talking about here.
Of course the powers that be won’t allow the truth to stand in the way!
Great point, well posited.
The pharmaceutical industry would not stop its anti-human agenda even if you could prove viruses don’t exist. *shrug*
Agree with your comment, but disagree with use of the weaponised word “denier”. How about “Truth enabler?”
Not impressed at all, more like reverse psychology to me.
>> No virus has ever been isolated (therefore HOW can they make a cure in the form of a so called vaccine or jab ?).
>> No virus has ever been proved to be transmittable from animal to human or human to human (therefore WHY can they make a cure in the form of a so called vaccine or jab ?).
Hi Bob, it may be worth you doing a slightly deeper dive into who Igor Chudov is before dismissing him simply because you don’t agree with his view on something. Look up cypherpunk, I can’t be sure it’s the same guy who was a cypherpunk, along with Julian Assange, but very interesting if it is. If it is the same guy, it would explain why there is such a heavy attack to discredit him – he will have upset the establishment a long time ago, no doubt.
Mentioning Assange won’t help on the case. The deniers have proofs, that part then can’t be a PsyOp, to publish an article like this means responsibility or would you like to follow that amnesty begging evil chick?
The only reason people take the experimental killer shots is the fear of a virus, that fear killed already many. The truth about viruses (exosomes) is the more important thing now and the ‘now’ is pretty late. To call the truth to be a PsyOp is evil or evil level stupidity – you choose.
Rhoda never said the theory is a psyop, she exposed a particular, supposed agent of the theory, as possibly being one.
Feel sad for you, you’re clearly among the big majority who can’t tell lies from truth any more.
Re-read your comment several times WE, it does seem nonsensical to me.
Think it’s wiser to support something logical than just attack?!
Post something logical =)
It is not possible to prove the negative that viruses do not exist. You can attempt to discredit every piece of evidence that demonstrates the positive, that they do exist. But that does not constitute proof that they do not exist. Its uproveable.
This reminds me very much of the Trinity Doctrine, a philosophical mind game technique used my the demons to deny the purpose of our existence which is to follow Jesus Christ into divinity.
I am going to try this now: In the name of Jesus Christ, hopefully with his authority, I command any demon possessed person commenting on this article to admit his possession explicitly with a further comment to this article forthwith. Might be a long shot. But worth a try. Because this is all getting very trinity-esque
My admission, in the name of Jesus. Evil has penetrated right to the bowels of the earth. Prejudice and bias has led many astray. I was once told I am not a Christian because I don’t go from door to door spreading the word. How quickly they turned upon me knocking on their door, KJV Bible in hand, wanting to share Mark ch.7 vs. 14,15 with them after also being told that this verse “DOES NOT EXIST”
Judgement begins at the House of God. Please do not use HIS name in vain.
And yet, the bulk of scientific evidence aligns well with the theory of virology. If you think science is built on absolute proofs- you have a lot to learn. Might want to research why there are so many more scientific theories than laws.
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear; looks like I have the whole “Brigade 77 – wannabe fighters” on my back tonight.
A quick response, because that is all that my patience and intelligence will give now:
I am an engineer, a good one as well; I had to study science through school and parts through UNI – science as we know it today – but the science you are fed in general is utter BS. Science is the most up to date THEORY we have, but true science moves on and on.
The question isn’t ‘do viruses exist or not?’. But rather do they cause symptoms and/or disease?
[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]
My mind is open about the virus versus no virus question. Not just convid but all viruses. What indeed are they. I’ve watched lots of serious researchers say they don’t exist, or if they do, they don’t cause disease. On the other hand, common sense (chicken pox and rabies come to mind] suggests they do exist…. and what the hell have virologists been studying at all these years? However, I find the Expose running this article at the very least uninformed of the valid no-virus camp research. And the immediate thing that occurred to me was: is this “Boostershots” substack the psyop as Expose claims, or is this a fake substack intended to make it look like the no-virus camp is a psyop and thus to discredit the no virus theories? And then I ask – is the Expose trying to discredit the no virus camp when it should remain neutral?
None of them is a virus caused disease.
Rabies is a hoax in this form, it’s the inflammation of the brain, can be caused by many different things except a never isolated virus. But because it’s so terrifying people forget to think when they hear ‘rabies’ Hollywood also did a lot to plant it just like King with his Cujo.
Look for it with search engine, the Expose doesn’t allow its direct link…
Millicent Morden: Rabies Past Present in Scientific Review
Chicken pox and many childhood illnesses are ‘designed programs’ by god or nature or creator, for protection in later life, there were many studies on them, ‘Positive effect of childhood diseases’ on whale dot to.
Most likely caused by electromagnetic frequencies, similar reaction to when women who work together experience that their cycles arrange to each others’ timing.
No virus was proven to cause it.
Absolutely. Agree with you. Just want to find out more but this whole thing denies further debate.
Hi Alison, maybe the logical questions to ask are: who would run a psysop and for what purpose?
There is a link in the article to another article about what a psyop is and how it’s designed. There are links to the Substack that was running a psyop using the “no virus” theory. If you follow those links and have a read you may be able to answer both questions, as well as the question you raised, for yourself. I would suggest you read the article about how to run and design a psyop first as that helps us identify a psysop when we see one. And then take a look at Boostershots Substack and see what you think. I provided those links specifically with this in mind: so anyone who wanted to check for themselves were easily able to do so.
As for who is behind it? I guess the only indicator, without any inside knowledge, would be how professionally it’s being run. The less professional looking ones will be activists (some of whom may be trained to some degree in such operations) and the more professional it seems the more likely they are specifically trained in psyops – really effective ones of course are run by the military and secret services.
If you deny that viruses exist then you deny that whole virus vaccines exist. So you deny
More details are in https://expose-news.com/2022/10/30/mhra-confirms-covid-19-is-man-made/
These vaccines are made by growing SARS2 virions (whole virus particles) in Green Monkey vero cells (using their replciating machinery) and then killing them. Virus do not have replicating machinery. They hijack the machinery of a host cell in order to replicate.
This is an obvious Psy op designed to make antivaxxers look like science deniers. When we are science acceptors and vaxxers are science deniers
Once you have the genetic code of a virus you just feed it into a cell and it hijacks that cell to make more copies of the virus in addition to the cell components. Cells can obviously make DNA and RNA and proteins and put the one inside the other, for that is how they replicate. Unless of course you deny cell replication too.
The best way to spot a Psy op is to use the existence and uniqueness argument of Pure Maths. It goes like this. The Intelligence services are doing something to damage the antivax camp (Existence). And the most distracting and damaging thing in our camp is virus denial, which is designed to make us all look like flat earthers with massive tin foil hats.
THAT IS PRECISELY WHAT THESE COMMENTS LOOK LIKE. They are a massive turn off for anyone with any understanding or love for genetics.- which is an inredible subject (although I personally prefer pure maths).
Since this is the most agressively and consistenly pursued and damaging attack that is presenlty mounted on the expose (from an information standpoint). It is a Psyop (uniqueness).
Intel people ARE doing something. THIS is what is the most effective thing that is being done. Therefore Intel people must be doing it.
I have to congratulate Rhoda for proving it, by eliciting these comments.
It is the military Intel people who made and funded the Virus. Infowars is covering that in great detail with Dr Peter McCullough TODAY.
https://www.infowars.com/posts/why-covid-19-mass-vaccination-is-a-military-operation/
So of course the Military Intel people would plant seeds saying – Nothing to see here folks. There is no SARS2 virus, We made nothing. And furthermore there are no viruses at all. Nobody made anything. Nothing was made.
The main tenet of Intel services until this century was to DENY THEIR OWN EXISTENCE. They are a SECRET SERVICE. So denial of existence is their MO. OBVIOUSLY.
One might says that denial of existence is in the DNA of intel services – HAHAHAHAHA
Hence they are the totally obivous candidate for denial of virus existence.
Matthew27, Mark15, John119 says that the soldiers braided the crown of thorns and they spat on Jesus.
I interpreted this and the Expose published it last year as meaning that US military gene spliced (double helixed) the Corona virus of spike proteins and then infected Christians (the body of Jesus) with it. I said it was the last abuse meted out to the Christ before Crucifiction.
St Paul said: Let God be true though every man a liar (Romans 3:4).
God called this one correctly 2,000 years ago. What I would like to see, rather than Doctors losing their licences for telling the truth, is Intelligence operatives losing their 00 status and their jobs and being banned from any intelligence activities for 7 years for telling destructive lies.
Woops Crucifixion might migth been a better spelling! His death is a historical fact attested to by the Roman Senator and Historian Tacitus.
Sorry for the late reply LW, been keeping bums in Lichess.
Thoroughly enjoyed the thoughtful stuff you wrote for the Expose, much i agreed with, other stuff i’ve retained in memory as no guarantees what i currently think is right. My previous history of current hypotheses turning out to be unlikely, means i’m strongly committed to some but have no sacred cows. If something stops being rational i’m more than happy to discard it.
Personally don’t think viruses exist currently, i too think we were designed/created and infection theory makes less sense to me at the moment. What i do know is we’re constantly lied to in the current order, which has actually existed for much of our history. The filth have held extreme power for several centuries, so much of what we think of as truth are lies. They have literal control of what we perceive in this evil system, so much of what we believe is due to the way they condition us to believe their lies.
You’re definitely one of the people i’d love an interesting, lively discussion with, look after yourself and keep shining.
So the help finally arrived. Getting funny…
As if you and ilk don’t help each other constantly.
If you email the expose they will forward you my email address. Perhaps we can sharpen up each other’s judgment? I personally cannot wait for the apocalypse where everything concealed will be revealed. I do agree though we will all be shocked at the extent of the deception. But this is all to teach us the judgement we need to see through deceptions in the future.
Cheers me darling, look forward to some interesting discussions.
Lichess chess site?
Indeed, i’m a natural, really good player. Never cheated at anything in my life, if i can’t achieve with my own abilities it’s worth nothing, a lie.
Me neither although I kind of got silenced when I had a discussion with a pro-poisoner in chat there. Hoping to get it undone eventually 🙁.
My friend told me not to bother coz he got silenced there and said they don’t like right wing people there 🙂.
Absolute nonsense from someone who has a financial interest in a biotech company and so wants to believe the pseudoscience of virology.
You fail to understand the difference between sequences in a database and supposed infectious viral particles. You now fail to understand what a cytopathic effect is and how “growing” a virus in cell culture is nothing of the sort.
It’s great that the Expose team will allow you to share previous nonsense that you have published but they won’t allow me to share what i have previously written. You do not have a background in biomedicine and i have 30 years’ experience but apparently your misinformed opinions deserve to be heard and my well-informed evidence-based opinions are censored.
Show proof that viruses “hijack the machinery of a host cell in order to replicate” and are not just non replicating extracellular vesicles and EM artifacts. I worked with vero cells for 8 years “growing viruses”. Have you ever worked with them?
The genetic code of a “virus” is pieced together on a computer and does not exist in its entirety in reality. Prove otherwise. That is not to “deny cell replication” which is another fallacious argument, of course cells can replicate because they have complete genomes rather than fictional genomes like viruses.
“THAT IS PRECISELY WHAT THESE COMMENTS LOOK LIKE. They are a massive turn off for anyone with any understanding or love for genetics.- which is an inredible subject.”
I have 15 peer reviewed articles on human genetics in print and i still say VIRUSES ARE NOT REAL. It’s safe to say i have a very good understanding of genetics. How many genetics papers have you had published?
I have no financial interest in a biotech company. You are a straight up liar.
Or you are not the sharpest tool, sorry, he meant the vaccine companies you mentioned as credible sources.
You have stated your investment in your friends biotech company on this forum on more than one occasion..
No I stated I had a friend who made a billion selling his company to Amgem. He used the herpes virus as a cancer torpedo. I have a social relatioship with him, not a financial one. I never stated I had a financial relationship with him. There is no “my investment”. You made those words up. You continue deliberately to misrepresent me in order falsely to discredit me. Where have I seen that behaviour before? Intel operatives. Why don’t you come up with a dossier?
With 30 years research behind them. I know who I will support.
Remember, NO PRIVATE INTERPRETATION of the scriptures.
And here you are railing accusations of “liar” at a Soul of which we are not worthy of to wash their feet.
Again, may the Lord Jesus reward you acdcording to your work.
Sorry to ask this and only if you have the time and interested. There were a two part series from Dr Lanka, The New Body Soul Biology (spacebusters, odysee), a part of it about genetics and very hard to follow. He mentioned a famous conference in 2008 or 2012? where genetics were really arguing, that part looked important but we think we failed to catch the point, the ‘soul’ has come back into genetics because they couldn’t explain things?
Ive read a lot of Dr Lankas work and i agree with him on most issues. Im not familiar with the particular conference you are talking about though?
It’s my other nick, fresh, not for cheating but because of different moderations, I was unable to sent comments under this name I don’t know why no matter what I wrote it was ‘waiting for approval’ upon refresh they disappeared.
Recently it happens rather often.
To avoid repetition please have a look the two comments with photos which was sent to VoiceFromEurope.
Genome in dissolution. If I understood him well – and that would be the question – he just said that there can’t be mRNA treatments and what we think we know about genome, genes are false – which means that genetic testing’ results are false too but as there are too much money involved they just can’t stop.
Make your arguments with JoNova, a very intelligent sincere lady with a large following.
There are billion observations that can’t be explained with the hypothesis that viruses don’t exist. I just keep pointing at the data. Isn’t that what science is?
Viruses have been isolated genetically, antigenically, with electron microscopes, and in functional plaque assays millions of times. The requirement that someone must also isolate them molecularly is an anachronistic, semantic, expensive and irrelevant point.
We don’t have to isolate a box of pure computer virus to know that computer viruses exist.
We can only make copies of viruses by putting them in cells which use all the same chemical elements and much of the same coding and proteins. Separating out the viruses from 100,000 similar chemicals to get purity is possible but expensive and scientifically pointless.
We isolate them with plaque assays, antibody tests, electron micrographs, PCR analysis, contact tracing, symptoms, blood tests for D-Dimer, Cytokines, blood oxy levels, etc etc etc. We do binding tests on various subparts of the virus with ACE2 TMPRSS2 and nuclear transport proteins, etc etc etc. See Nextstrain to get some idea of how much data they can’t explain. (Mouseover and then double click the dots on Nextstrain to see more data).
There’s a billion observations that already fit the hypothesis that viruses are real. The hypothesis that all viruses are fake explains none of them…
https://joannenova.com.au/2022/06/weekend-unthreaded-417/#comment-2561474
I was fully vaccinated, yet still clinically died twice from the same disease supposedly protected from.
Please, for your own Soul’s sake, stay away from vain theories, of which germ is one.
May the Lord reward you according to your work.
And know this, that there NO private interpretation of the scriptures.
You may want to have Jo Nova’s comments around as well.
There are billion observations that can’t be explained with the hypothesis that viruses don’t exist. I just keep pointing at the data. Isn’t that what science is?
Viruses have been isolated genetically, antigenically, with electron microscopes, and in functional plaque assays millions of times. The requirement that someone must also isolate them molecularly is an anachronistic, semantic, expensive and irrelevant point.
We don’t have to isolate a box of pure computer virus to know that computer viruses exist.
We can only make copies of viruses by putting them in cells which use all the same chemical elements and much of the same coding and proteins. Separating out the viruses from 100,000 similar chemicals to get purity is possible but expensive and scientifically pointless.
We isolate them with plaque assays, antibody tests, electron micrographs, PCR analysis, contact tracing, symptoms, blood tests for D-Dimer, Cytokines, blood oxy levels, etc etc etc. We do binding tests on various subparts of the virus with ACE2 TMPRSS2 and nuclear transport proteins, etc etc etc. See Nextstrain to get some idea of how much data they can’t explain. (Mouseover and then double click the dots on Nextstrain to see more data).
There’s a billion observations that already fit the hypothesis that viruses are real. The hypothesis that all viruses are fake explains none of them…
https://joannenova.com.au/2022/06/weekend-unthreaded-417/#comment-2561474
What a joke. You call people ‘virus deniers’. That sums up where you are coming from and it has nothing to do with science or honest debate.
This is no psyop, it is the final boss for your awakening. Most of the pharmaceuticals are a fraud, governments are trying to kill you and virus science is a fraud.
Virus science is being used to kill you. The spike protein is made by virus science. It is 12½% of the virus proteins. Virus denial is being used to protect those who made it. Would you write off all of football because some people commit fouls?
They didn’t make any spike protein. When a cell is dying it has a so called ‘corona’ effect, and looks like as if ‘spike proteins’ would form but that only dead cell debris.
All of the symptoms experienced can be explained the graphene and its properties (multiplies radiation), magnetic if mixed with lipids and as the red blood cells have a negative charge the graphene changes it, you might learn in the school that same charges are push each other while the different attract each other, when the graphene partially change the negative charge of the red blood cells they start to clot.
The same effect can be seen because of wireless tech (smart meter, mobiles) but in that cases when the exposure ends red blood cells go back to normal. But if the graphene in you they can’t go back normal.
I am not vaccinated against so called covid19. I love living natural and taking care of myself as much as possible. I transformed covid restrictions to make better myself. I joined gym, started researching healthy ways to live and researched what is behind this covid nonsense thanks to lots of free time that they give us by ordering to stay at home. It really opened my eyes and I don’t see the world as I see in 2019. Ivermectin is bashed even though doctors have proven that it works. You can take care of your entire self by visiting https://ivmpharmacy.com
If you are going to claim the “no virus” is psyop, then you should also address the fact the EMF can mimic the effects of a virus. There is a lot of evidence to suggest this is indeed the case where certain “outbreaks” occur when 5G is activated thereby disabling the bodies ability to uptake Oxygen.
Knowing i have scant understanding of real truth, is something i’m comfortable with.
Within my current consciousness, personally am fine with ambiguity/lack of real knowledge. Unlike most, i don’t need validation by others, personally love the challenge of trying to discover what is real. Life is about learning and developing, finding out what really matters to me.
Beauty and the “magic” are always there, if you just open your eyes to see. We are wonderfully created/designed.
Personally have much downvote interference with my comments but it’s effects are poor, clever, decent people have enough nuance to see what’s more likely real.
Really think The Expose should do away with up and down votes, the current system only helps the ugliest of people, even things. You’re one of the rare sites which allows open discussion, please let it be fair too.
Personally believe, yet again, we’re designed/created for infinite growth, understanding and appreciation of all the wonder/beauty we’ve been lovingly given in my opinion. And the respect necessary to be loving/considerate to what many consider lesser beings.
However, a challenge was raised which our creator/designer thought fair to play out. Personally agree with them, after seeing all the inhuman cruelty and ugliness in the filth’s system, doubt anybody who isn’t daft, will doubt the beautiful thoughts of our probable Creator again.
Hi Demeter, when there is what we call “swarming” on a post, try not to take it personally. The tactic is to try to shame, bully and intimidate people into submission so in that way it’s not personal.
Didn’t take it personally Rhoda but seriously appreciate your kind words.
My concern is it being offputting to newbies, there are quite a few attack dogs who are huge posters on the site.
I already offered these to watch, more times as was ignored – but it might count as ‘trolling’.
A very important material which I could follow more easily when Dr Lanka made his lecture during The Healing Conference 2021 without the voice over.
https://odysee.com/@DeansDanes:1/Healing-Conference-2021_Stefan-Lanka:a
OK, Rhoda,
If you’re legit and serious, and would like to settle whether or not the “virus” exists, you must either:
Provide the evidence, or link to the evidence (both of which Christine Massey has spent ~ a year scouring the globe for, with no joy), and/ or
Engage Christine Massey in a public discussion/ debate or simple interview, much like Jon Roppoport did. Link follows.
Hoping not, but I feel you’d rather go to ground than face anyone with knowledge, especially on that topic.
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/10/07/the-non-existent-virus-explosive-interview-with-christine-massey
You’re out of order Lou, Rhoda hasn’t done anything wrong, she’s a lovely woman who is under attack from bizarre/ugly ideology or a horrible disinformation attack. Get a grip Mister, unless you’re part of the attack.
Please pass this email addy to Lords Witnesses The Expose team, ok with me to send him my billing addy but this is the one i mainly use.
Hi Lou, unfrotunately you jump to too many conclusions too quickly and make too many incorrect assumptions.
Let’s try something novel. How about you enquire from me what I think rather than assume you know my mind? You may be surprised at my answers, who knows?
Thank you for taking the time to reply. I agree, my “knowledge” comment was unkind.
There appear to be many (non state-owned) experienced, credible scientists and doctors on both sides of the question. I’m a big fan of Dr Mercola who is on the “virus does exist” side. But without the evidence, I can only go with Christine Massey and doctor/ scientists like Judy Mikovits, who was on the front lines with Fauci. She explains it clearly:
“Every bio-safety level 4 lab that claimed to isolate SARS-CoV-2 from humans ultimately placed the sample in a monkey kidney cell line to “prove” its replication. This virus is not a truly isolated human virus because it could only be replicated in the monkey kidney cell line. To determine whether SARS-CoV-2 is an infectious human virus, it must be taken from the blood, sputum, or lung lavage of an infected human, but the infectious RNA of SARS-CoV-2 was never cultured in a continuously growing human cell line that supports the replication of SARS-CoV-2. Since this novel coronavirus only replicates demonstrably in vero monkey cell lines, it has never been proven to originate or spread from human-to-human, let alone spread from healthy people. Since the current flu, MMR and polio vaccines contain these same vero monkey cell lines, the only way to deploy SARS-CoV-2 is through transfection via these needles. SARS-CoV-2 is a lab-made sequence that originates and spreads through the existing influenza vaccine supply. This could be why the Department of Defense discovered that flu vaccine recipients from 2017-2018 were increasingly susceptible to coronavirus interference. “When you take a synthetic part of a virus and you grow it in the monkey cells, you can get recombination events of all the monkey viruses, so it’s a monkey virus,” Mikovits confirmed, referring to the respiratory infections seen in covid-19. The HIV component comes from the Simian immune deficiency virus, which is also a natural monkey virus.”
So why not talk publicly with Massey and/ or Mikovits?
Reasonable comment Lou and Judy has much worthwhile knowledge, however, don’t think she’s cutting edge in the times we’re in now.
Course we all have our favourites but think The Expose really tries to post the most relevant info for where we’re at now.