Breaking News

UK Gov. Report demands closure of all Airports by 2050 to meet “Climate Change” Targets & fuels fears of ‘Climate Lockdowns’

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

A sinister report conducted by Oxford University and Imperial College London for the UK government has outlined some drastic measures that may need to be taken in order to achieve the legal commitment of zero emissions by 2050.

According to the report, all airports in the UK, with the exception of Heathrow, Glasgow, and Belfast, will be required to close between 2020 and 2029.

These three airports will only be allowed to remain open if all transfers to and from the airport are done via rail. All remaining airports must then close between 2030 and 2049. In order to meet this legal commitment, the report states that every citizen of the United Kingdom will need to “stop using aeroplanes” for a significant period of time.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


In addition to the closure of airports, the report also states that in order to comply with the Climate Change Act, the public will need to stop doing anything that causes emissions, regardless of the energy source.

This means that the consumption of beef and lamb will need to be drastically reduced. The report suggests that national consumption of these meats will need to drop by 50% between 2020 and 2029, and then be “phased out” entirely between 2030 and 2049.

Furthermore, the report notes that the construction of new buildings will not be permitted in order to meet the zero emissions goal.

The underlying point is that any asset which uses carbon will have essentially zero value in 2050. This in turn may encourage greater use in the run up to 2050 – for example, putting up new buildings at a much faster rate for the next 30 years, knowing that construction must then halt.

The report was released in November 2019 and was authored by ‘UK Fires’, a collaboration between the Universities of Cambridge, Oxford, Nottingham, Bath and Imperial College London – the home of Professor Neil Ferguson.

Entitled ‘Absolute Zero’, the report is a research collaboration in which the authors reveal what the UK must do to meet its legal requirement to reach net zero emissions by 2050, and it makes for harrowing reading.

However, these measures may be accelerated due to a new legal target set by the UK government in April 2021 to reduce emissions by 78% by 2035.

The authors of the report state the key messages are as follows –

In addition to reducing our energy demand, delivering zero emissions with today’s technologies requires the phasing out of flying, shipping, lamb and beef, blast-furnace steel and cement.

They also state this on jobs and location –

There are two key implications for how we live our lives: first, buildings will become much more expensive because the restrictions on buildings which generate substantial scarcities; second, transport will become much more expensive because the limits on air travel will generate excess demand for other forms of transport.

Those who are starting secondary school now, in 2019, will be 43 in 2050. Thinking about what education is appropriate for a very different set of industries is a key question. Should we still be training aeroplane pilots? Or aeronautical engineers?

And they state this on the implementation of the requirements –

The changes in behaviour to achieve Absolute Zero are clearly substantial. In principle, these changes could be induced through changing prices and thus providing clear incentives for behaviour to change. The alternative is that the government prohibits certain types of behaviour and regulates on production processes.

It is worth noting that the travel industry has already been greatly affected by the alleged coronavirus pandemic and the resulting lockdown measures implemented by the government. Some may argue that the real purpose of the lockdown was to meet the government’s emission reduction targets, as suggested by the “Absolute Zero” report.

The report also recommends that the government use psychological manipulation and coercion to gain public support for these measures.

This has been a tactic used by the government in the past, such as during the coronavirus pandemic when strict lockdown measures were implemented under the guise of protecting the NHS and saving lives.

These measures have had a devastating impact on small businesses and have limited personal freedoms. It is likely that the government will use similar tactics to gain support for the measures outlined in the “Absolute Zero” report based on the recommendations made by Oxford University & Imperial College London –

Social norms and individual behaviours:

There is a misalignment between the scale of actions recommended by government (e.g. energy conservation) and those most commonly performed by individuals (e.g. recycling). Actions which can have a big effect, such as better insulation in houses and not flying, are being ignored in favour of small, high profile actions, such as not using plastic straws. This is enabling individuals to feel satisfied that they are ‘doing their bit’ without actually making the lifestyle changes required to meet the zero emissions target. If large scale social change is to be successful a new approach is needed.

Whilst the thought of society taking radical, meaningful steps to meet zero emission targets could be criticised for being idealistic, we can learn from historical cultural changes. Not long ago, smoking cigarettes was encouraged and considered to be acceptable in public spaces that children frequented, drink-driving was practiced with such regularity that it killed 1000 people per year in the UK, and discrimination based on sexual orientation was written into law. These behaviours now seem reprehensible, showing society is capable acknowledging the negative consequences of certain behaviours and socially outlawing their practice. Focus should therefore be centred on expediting the evolution of new social norms with confidence that change can happen.

Evidence from behavioural science, and the long experience in public health of changing behaviours around smoking and alcohol, shows that information alone is not enough to change behaviour. To make the types of changes described in this report, we will have to think more broadly on the economic and physical contexts in which designers, engineers and members of the public make decisions that determine carbon emissions.

At the same time, clear, accurate and transparent information on problems and the efficacy of proposed solutions is essential for maintaining public support for policy interventions. The phrasing of communication is also important. Messages framed about fear and climate crisis have been found to be ineffective at motivating change.

The longevity of the challenge of reducing emissions, and the lack of immediate or even apparent consequences of small individual actions mean it is challenging to link to them to the large-scale climate crisis. This allows individuals to make decisions which contrast with their desire to reduce emissions.

Scientific description is not always the most effective means of communication, and language used to promote zero emissions should no longer focus on an ‘ecofriendly’ and ‘green’ lexicon, but rather candid descriptions of actions that appeal to human fulfilment. Evidence from time-use studies shows that human fulfilment does not strictly depend on using energy – the activities we enjoy the most are the ones with the lowest energy requirements.

Consumers can be satisfied in a zero emissions landscape.

But they will also get the support they need by conditioning and indoctrinating your children in schools –

‘Starting with the difficult decisions, an educational setting should provide a timeline for actions to be taken by humanity in order to ensure that we hit our carbon reduction targets by 2050. By working backwards from 2050, and sequentially working out the order and timing in which key mitigation actions need to be taken, a roadmap for the necessary restraint can be established.

Across the secondary school system, this roadmap is essential in eliciting the questions which will inevitably come from the school children. This will enable an exploration of real change in the mind sets of those who will need to embrace change more than ever before later in their lives.

Huge questions will emerge, such as: will internal-combustion engines disappear, will aeroplanes disappear, will meat and-dairy agriculture disappear, and will we need to stop building things? By empowering school children to realise that asking the huge questions is appropriate, we will enable change to be embraced through education.

All of this will be done to allegedly reduce carbon emissions due to the alleged danger of global warming.

The average carbon footprint per person in the UK, per year, is 12.7 tonnes CO2e.

  1. Your heating would need to be going full blast for 80 days straight to produce 12.7 tonne CO2e.
  2. You would need to drive 23,000 miles in the average car to emit 12.7 tonnes of CO2e (that’s once around the world).
  3. You’d have to eat over 1,000 beef steaks to produce 12.7 tonnes CO2e.

In terms of global annual carbon emissions of ca. 38,000 megatonnes CO2e, 12.7 tonnes doesn’t sound like much. But when you consider a population of 68 million people in the UK alone, nearing 8 billion worldwide, all of a sudden it sounds like in order to meet a target which is enshrined in UK law and must be legally met, it may just be easier to reduce the population of the United Kingdom?

The past two and a half years have seen several lockdowns and other measures implemented in response to the coronavirus pandemic.

These measures have had a major impact on small businesses and the aviation industry, and there have been concerns about the treatment of the elderly and vulnerable in care homes and the disproportionate impact of the pandemic response on disabled people.

Additionally, the experimental vaccination program has resulted in millions of reported adverse reactions and thousands of deaths.

It is important to read the “Absolute Zero” report and consider the underlying motives behind these measures. It is possible that the events of the past two and half years are part of a larger, more sinister agenda that is only just beginning.

Share this page to Telegram
5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

33 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
OlSilver
OlSilver
1 month ago

Lunacy writ large

Douglass Hetherly
Douglass Hetherly
1 month ago

If World Citizens who want freedom and independence they have to stand up and kick these idiots out of office and get real people in office who support freedom and independence. Slavery, decimation of the population and no ability to fly, ride, travel or move around will be lost because these satanists are planning on killing most of you and the remainder will be total slaves used for sacrifices, blood for rituals and adrenalchrome, rapes and death with the remaining to grow food for the evil satanists. WAKE UP OR YOU ARE DEAD.

Lynda H
Lynda H
Reply to  Douglass Hetherly
1 month ago

Douglass, I share your frustration. I assure you I am awake (not woke): who can sleep soundly when we see what the future holds for us and our children? But how do we “kick these idiots out of office”? We’ve tried voting: that didn’t work. Those who have the resources have tried litigation: that didn’t work. The most despised tyrants cannot get voted out. Why? The democratic process we have relied on has been pulled out from under us, along with basic human rights. We are all looking for a plan of action, a bugle call, an organised revolt.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Lynda H
1 month ago

I agree that democracy doesn’t work-you would have to be blind to think otherwise!
It is possible to be dead whilst still ‘alive’.

But she that giveth herself to pleasure is dead while she liveth. 1 Timothy 5:6.

Hasn’t the western world been dumbed down by ‘pleasure’?

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Islander
1 month ago

What is the suggested form then if not democracy?

I don’t agree with you. What we did wrong, we missed punish the liars, bribed ones and so on. Anyone in office who proven to being bribed, etc should answer with the one’s life and the whole family’s fortune, I am sure that would work to stop this level of corruption. It worked for the Chinese and other nations for thousand year or so. The traitors were executed together with their whole clan, slaves, everyone. Cruel till the score but worked well.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

THEOCRACY!!!!

The Holy Bible (in the original tongues/manuscripts-Hebrew OT & Greek NT, preserved to the present day) teach explicitly in no uncertain terms that democracy will end in failure. I can expand upon this with full Scripture support if you are interested, but I am about to get some sleep.

Democracy is fit for the dustbin-nothing else! Think about it will you? What would an island full of (in your mind) evil people vote in-good or bad laws? I think you know!

Theocracy, as I am sure you know is government by God through Christ.

Leslie
Leslie
Reply to  Lynda H
1 month ago

Take a lesson from Brazil.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Leslie
1 month ago

I just have seen a heart breaking docu about Lybia. their excellent and murdered president.
40 years of work to give water for the whole continent, FREE electricity to everyone, if you bought a car the state paid 50%, the right to home was a basic right, the freshly married got 50 000 dollars, the loans had 0 interest and no Rothschild bank was present. Then H. Clinton et all arrived, bombed to dust the water system and the country and the first action was to establish a Rothschild bank.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

Yes, I just seen this! Vilified by the west! He got real bad press-I was brainwashed back then-by the western democracies!

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Lynda H
1 month ago

Starting at the lowest level of bureaucrats?

Names
Names
Reply to  Douglass Hetherly
1 month ago

Just to clarify, getting idiots out of office and real people in to have freedom and independence means destroying everything we know and the entire system that we have in place for thousands of years—Babylonian / Phoenician rulers on one side and world’s slave population on the other. It means first identifying who the main players are along with all smaller, going against police force, army and quite possibly friends and family members. This can be done when some 80 percent of population is in agreement and work together. It also means you will have to do some dirty job, too, like hanging them without courts because judges will be among them. Are we capable?

Leslie
Leslie
1 month ago

This is absolute insanity. They won’t be happy until we are back living in caves. Climate change is not even settled science & they are turning our world upside down. Get rid of these lunatics.

JdL
JdL
1 month ago

Carbon dioxide is at about half of one part in a thousand, which is way lower than when dinosaurs roamed the earth with our proto-mammalian ancestors. WTF is this paranoid fear of a bit more CO2 based upon other than mindless delirium?

Dan
Dan
Reply to  JdL
1 month ago

These enteties already have money they want pure CONTROL of everything and everyone. Global warming/ climate change is just BS, used as an excuse to bring in these draconian rules to enslave us…its not really about zero emissions.
This programmable CBDC will be the nail in the coffin….along with their 15 minute smart cities.( electric gates for each zone) where jab jabs will become compulsory and no dought transhumanism. What’s the option ?
Buy some land and TRY to stay rural.

Names
Names
Reply to  Dan
1 month ago

Owning rural land won’t be enough. It will be taken from you one way or another. Unless you go ahead full force and fight them, kill therm and rebuild the world afterwards. No fighting and hard work – no freedom and peace. Remember, The Prince of Peace said he did not come to send peace, but a sword.

Dan
Dan
Reply to  Names
1 month ago

Just trying to think of options but it does seem hopeless. I have land in Portugal but with the GNR the land will soon be grabbed from the farmers and expats. I have a self contained campervan with solar panels but they will make it impossible for private motorists in the future(will hopefully help me for the initial transition) complete off griders will be soon rounded up and put into camps with lidaar and other thermal imaging technologies. But I will take my chances rather than be in these 15 min smart prison cities. I will be free for as long as possible and independent from THEIR bs system.

julal
julal
1 month ago

so the elite can fly but not your underdogs when is this corruption going to end these people need to crawl back under their stonesand hopefully get crushed

GundelP
GundelP
1 month ago

Surely not all of them. Then how their often used private jets can take off, from where with what help (radar, navigation of the tower, etc).

Names
Names
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

Do you not think they have their own private airports? They own and control the entire world. They can also use their military airbases after all.

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Read more: See where it’s going? UK Government Report demands closure of all airports by 2050… […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Read more: See where it’s going? UK Government Report demands closure of all airports by 2050 to … […]

Yosua
Yosua
1 month ago

STOP BRAINWASHONG PEOPLE BU SPREADING THAT CLIMATE CHANGE HOAX!

There is NO man-made climate change. Climate changes naturaly due to solar activity. “Global warning” or “climate change” is a lie used for political agenda, by these globalists that want to enslave the whole world.
What the world is really suffering from now is from dirty politicians, corrupt judges, and all these dirty people pushing for deadly vaccines, AI electric vehicles, depopulation and that awful lgbt abomination.

Yosua
Yosua
1 month ago

Carbon tax in in fact an OXYGEN TAX! People inhale oxygen and exhale CO2. It’s the same thing with combustion. They call it “carbon tax” but in fact they tax the oxygen you use. Oxygen, like water is the most basic need for life. What these scoundrels of politicians and dirty globalists are really doing now is TAXING PEOPLE FOR THEIR RIGHT TO LIVE!

Annonymous
Annonymous
1 month ago

I’ve longed to see an end to air travel for decades. It’s a,disgusting industry that should never have been allowed .
And people are gluttony stuffing themselves with the murdered lambs and calves and birds and fish of this planet as if they’re still some sort of berserk caveman .

trackback
1 month ago

[…] by the year 2050, nearly all airports in the United Kingdom will need to be completely shut down, according to researchers at the University of Oxford and Imperial College […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] by the year 2050, nearly all airports in the United Kingdom will need to be completely shut down, according to researchers at the University of Oxford and Imperial College […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] by the year 2050, nearly all airports in the United Kingdom will need to be completely shut down, according to researchers at the University of Oxford and Imperial College […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] by the year 2050, nearly all airports in the United Kingdom will need to be completely shut down, according to researchers at the University of Oxford and Imperial College […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] by the year 2050, nearly all airports in the United Kingdom will need to be completely shut down, according to researchers at the University of Oxford and Imperial College […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] by the year 2050, nearly all airports in the United Kingdom will need to be completely shut down, according to researchers at the University of Oxford and Imperial College […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] het door globalisten beoogde “nul-emissie”-paradigma tegen het jaar 2050 te bereiken, moeten volgens onderzoekers van de Universiteit van Oxford en het Imperial College London bijna alle luchthavens in het […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Globalisten angestrebte „Null-Emissions“-Paradigma bis zum Jahr 2050 zu erreichen, müssen nach Ansicht von Forschern der Universität Oxford und des Imperial College London fast alle Flughäfen im […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Globalisten angestrebte „Null-Emissions“-Paradigma bis zum Jahr 2050 zu erreichen, müssen nach Ansicht von Forschern der Universität Oxford und des Imperial College London fast alle Flughäfen im […]