Breaking News

Vaccinated were already dying proportionally more than the unvaccinated up to May last year when the ONS stopped reporting

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

A few days ago, we published an article that the BBC had reported that the excess deaths during 2022 were the worst in 50 years. For months on end, The Exposé has been analysing the ONS source BBC used to “show unvaccinated people were more likely to die” and that’s how we know the BBC lied when it stated:

Figures up to June 2022 looking at deaths from all causes show unvaccinated people were more likely to die than vaccinated people.

If vaccines were driving excess deaths we would expect this to be the other way around.”If vaccines were driving excess deaths we would expect this to be the other way around.

Excess deaths in 2022 among worst in 50 years, BBC, 10 January 2022

The day after BBC‘s article, other researchers also took another look at the figures and, through their own methods, confirmed our conclusion.  While we exposed the BBC for not “marking its own homework,” El Gato Malo and Joel Smalley expose the ONS’s manipulation and hiding of data.

On Wednesday, El Gato Malo re-analysed the ONS “vaccine effectiveness” data.  El Gato wrote:

The history of covid vaccine studies and health agency communication is littered with what look to be numerous layers of deliberate manipulation and misrepresentation, some wilful, some simply the result of ill-informed trust in agencies and companies.

Working through this data to attempt to remove or sidestep these injected biases has been bit of a drudge as the agencies holding the data have refused to release the raw records and have presented their analyses in such a manner as to bake in bad assumptions and worse Bayesian practice, especially when it comes to properly ascribing risk and outcome.

All this analysis is therefore never going to rise to full RCT standards, but we do the best we can with what we have and the fact remains: it’s easy to do a great deal better than the agencies themselves are doing by just trying to be a bit honest.

Another look at UK all-cause mortality by vaxx status, El Gato Malo, 11 January 2022

El Gato Malo’s analysis uses data from, and only from, ONS that is based on the ONS’s own calculations for age-standardised mortality rate per 100k person-years.

“Once you look at it properly it does not support that narrative that vaccines prevent overall deaths in the vaccinated and, especially once we apply even rudimentary Bayesian discipline upon the data, refutes it quite soundly,” El Gato Malo said. “The case that it is the vaccinated driving the currently elevated death levels looks to be the one most supported by the data and people are noticing.  This is going to demand explanation,” he wrote.

Because Member of Parliament Andrew Bridgen was suspended from the Conservative Party and El Gato had re-analysed the data, Joel Smalley felt compelled to “return to [his] roots and do [his] own updated analysis of deaths by date of occurrence in England.”

“Like El Gato, I’ve put a lot of work into making sure that the data has integrity and the analysis is robust,” said Smalley.  Below is information taken from Smalley’s latest look at excess death in the UK.

Excess mortality is shown by seasons which cover the twelve months from June to May.  Before the covid “pandemic,” there was a noticeable trend in seasonal excess mortality – excess mortality was lower in the seasons immediately following seasons of higher excess mortality.  For example, in the tables below, the season for June 2015 to May 2016 has low excess mortality while the year before, in the 2014/2015 season, the excess mortality was higher.  The same is seen for 2018/2019.  The season for June 2018 to May 2019 was low while for the previous year, 2017/2018, was high.

However, this was not the case after the covid injection campaign began.

“Early season” refers to deaths occurring during the seven-month period June and December. In the early season of 2021/2022, excess mortality was 143% higher than the lowest early season since 2014.  The 2021/2022 early season, with the highest excess mortality, began in June 2021, six months after the mass covid injection campaign began in the UK.

Table 1

“Full season” refers to deaths occurring during the twelve-month period June to May. For 2019/2020, which included the entirety of the covid epidemic, the excess mortality was 117% more than the lowest full season since 2014.

Table 2

“Late season” refers to deaths occurring during the five-month period January to May.  The late season 2019/2020 includes the months between January 2020 to May 2020, the worst of the covid “pandemic.”

Even if we compare the 2021/2022 early season (143%) to the late season 2019/2020 (147%) – where covid makes a disproportionate impact – “we are still comparing a signal of 143% increase with 147%,” Smalley wrote. 

In other words, excess deaths during the first five months of the covid “pandemic” were only marginally higher (147%) than the first seven months (Table 1) after the rollout of the “vaccine” (143%).

Table 3

Based on the high excess mortality in 2019/2020, represented by 147%, the Government destroyed livelihoods and even lives.

“It was daily headline news. They threw billions and billions of pounds (mainly to their mates) to deal with the problem but which has been proven beyond reasonable doubt had no material impact at all,” Smalley wrote.

But when it comes to the 2021/2022 signal, represented by 147%, the Government is silent.  In fact, worse than silent, they are actively attempting to silence anyone who questions it – such as the suspension of Mr. Bridgen from the Conservative Party.

Additionally, considering the pre-covid trends the early season for 2021/22 (Table 1) ought to have been the lowest, at the very bottom end of the scale, following not just one massive full season (Table 2) the year before but also the full extent of epidemic covid in the late season (Table 3) for 2019/2020.

“When presented with the irrefutable evidence that, in the six months after the mass injection of the population with an experimental medical treatment, the excess mortality signal is at least as high as when the deadly pathogen emerged, the government and media don’t even so much as want to talk about it but they have to shut up anyone else who dares to try,” Smalley wrote.

A Twitter user re-tweeted El Gato expressing a “deeply worrying result” when he looked at “ the best set of raw, age stratified all cause deaths data by vaccination status” that he had found.  Several comments were posted under the tweet, including comments from El Gato explaining more.  One of El Gato’s tweets stated: “The reason i like to work from data as close to raw as possible is to avoid this sort of manipulation.  ONS has become as bad as CDC and is adopting similar tactics (denominatorgate).  They also terminate raw data reporting when it goes against their preferred claims.”

To which ONS’s Head of Mortality Analysis, Sarah Caul, responded: “No evilness here. Just doing our usual standards since pre-pandemic and throughout.”  El Gato quite rightly challenged her:

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

17 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
A Person
A Person
15 days ago

And the NSW Surveillance Respiratory Report in Australia has also just stopped reporting for hospitalisations and deaths by poison status 🙁.

The final report, for the period 18-31 December, 2022, revealed that the number of hospitalisations (‘vaccinated’ meant a ‘COVID-19’ diagnosis in the previous 14 days) was:
‘VACCINATED’………….1415
‘UNVACCINATED’………0
UNKNOWN……………….364

In the report for the next week, they stated:
“Vaccination status of cases admitted to hospital, admitted to ICU and those who die are no longer reported here…Staying up to date with COVID-19 vaccinations, as recommended by ATAGI, is the most important factor to protect against serious outcomes from infection.”

Yes, I can understand that it’s the most important factor – you have to make sure that you don’t receive them!

The report is easily searchable in Google but they block my link for it if I post it.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  A Person
14 days ago

Hotdogs are much better for you than a convid jab!

Augustus
Augustus
14 days ago

The CDC and FDA are coming to the same conclusion. It’s kinda curious that these trusted agencies are dropping this at the same time. Once again the conspiracy theorist are right again. Never trust your life to government bureaucrats and their shills.

Rabbi Seamus
Rabbi Seamus
Reply to  Augustus
14 days ago

Once you know the driving force behind everything bad, life is much simpler.

37503e653dec9f15.jpeg.jpg
Augustus
Augustus
Reply to  Rabbi Seamus
14 days ago

Gotcha. I just don’t want to mention the baby killer cult thats goal is to enslave the world. People might assume that I’m racist or something.

badvoc
badvoc
14 days ago

ONS is fraudulent organisation that is taking public funds and able to do the service they are taking funds for, they are also supporting an terrorist organisation

Conner
Conner
14 days ago

If you took the jab it’s like a ticking time bomb, it’s best to not do anything to stanulis…

Mark Deacon
Mark Deacon
14 days ago

Because they now hide the information tells me all I need too know.

If something was so good, fantastic, best thing ever … why would you feel the need too hide it? Even if there was no correlation too something damaging as in no bad effect it could be revealed to dismiss concerns.

Take it either way … it’s either they know it is bad and they hide it or there is nothing good, positive or neutral for them to push in the narrative.

Rabbi Seamus
Rabbi Seamus
14 days ago

In the USA, once serums are listed on the child a hedule, there is no compensation against the manufacturer.

The aborted child has no say in how their body parts are exploited in serum manufacture.

75148a77db6258f9.jpeg.jpg
trackback
14 days ago

[…] – Vaccinated were already dying proportionally more than the unvaccinated up to May last year when the… […]

bangbangsilverhammer
bangbangsilverhammer
14 days ago

This article is true. The data is out there if anyone cares to do their own research.

The last three years of pseudo-pandemic was never a real health emergency. It was a an IQ test incognito. The people who did their own research and avoided all the injections marketed as ‘vaccines’ are now considered the smartest 10%* of the population.

*It’s probably a lot more than 10% of the population because the data shows many more millions never took any of the jib jabs, especially when you compare the data against the numbers of unjabbed quoted by the BBC big p-harm-a propaganda machine during 2021.

trackback
13 days ago

[…] The following featured article is from the very highly recommended Expose, here […]

trackback
11 days ago

[…] 另外一个疑虑是,为什么只有到2022年5月的数据?我从Expose 得知,英国在2022年5月后就停止发布这样的数据,因此独立新闻机构就无法在取得原始资料进行分析并挑战政府和主媒的论调了。(参阅《截至去年5月国家统计局停止报告时,接种疫苗的人死亡比例已经高于未接种疫苗的人》(Vaccinated were already dying proportionally more than the unvaccinated up to May last year when the…) […]

trackback
10 days ago

[…] The following featured article is from the very highly recommended Expose, here […]