The wild and reckless global warming fascists who claim that the world is getting hotter (or possibly colder) as a result of man’s activities tell a great many lies.
The same lies are then repeated by politicians, journalists, half-crazy alarmists, campaigners, people who demonstrate and children who probably have difficulty with their two-times table but who like to regard themselves as experts on meteorological eccentricities.
Naturally, the hysterical fruitcakes who believe in climate change (like the idiots who promote the covid-19 vaccine) refuse to debate their beliefs.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Here are just a few of the most egregious lies which are told by this miserable band of lunatics:
1. They claim that the climate has changed and is changing rapidly. What they don’t bother to mention is that the climate has always changed. It has changed for billions of years and will doubtless continue to do so. Although a good many lies are told there is no evidence that these changes have been exacerbated or accelerated by cows, motor cars or aeroplanes.
2. They claim that the world is heading for a crisis. They have been forecasting this for decades. Every specific forecast has come and gone without anything happening. Claims that the sea is going to rise to dangerous levels are entirely fictitious and are nothing more than reckless, irresponsible scaremongering.
3. No one knows just what damage carbon dioxide emissions may do or how relevant they are. The increase in the amount of carbon dioxide began before oil and gas were in wide use. Human beings themselves are natural producers of carbon dioxide and many of those promoting the climate change myth believe that the answer is to reduce the world’s population from around 8 billion down to 500 million.
4. It is not true that all or even most climate scientists agree that climate change exists or is a threat. Most independent scientists agree that the media has wildly exaggerated the dangers. A recent paper reported that just 0.3% of scientists agree that humans are causing climate change. The climate change psychos claim that 97% of scientists support their arguments but this is, quite simply, dangerous nonsense designed to promote a myth. The alleged climate change risks are merely assumptions based on guesses based on wishful thinking. Many of the scientists and writers who promote the climate change myth are receiving huge sums of money from activists, pressure groups and non-governmental organisations. There are hidden agendas behind the myth.
5. Weather forecasters claim to know what the weather will be like in 50 years’ time. This is odd because they admit that forecasting a few weeks ahead is difficult and much of the time they seem to have trouble telling us what the weather will be like tomorrow.
6. They claim that hurricanes and tornadoes are more frequent and stronger. The evidence shows that this is not true. There is absolutely no evidence that hurricanes or tornadoes are stronger or more common. Nor is there any evidence that snowstorms or floods are worse or less than they were decades ago. If there is more flooding of houses it is because houses are built on flood plains or that rivers are not properly dredged.
7. They claim that wildfires are commoner and more destructive. This is palpably untrue. There are fewer serious wildfire events today than there were decades ago.
8. They claim that sea levels are rising rapidly and are the cause of coastal erosion. These are lies. Coastal erosion is a common, historical problem and has nothing to do with sea levels. Sea levels have been unaffected by climate change. Modest changes in sea levels are normal and of little consequence.
9. Wind turbines which are widely promoted as an alternative to coal, oil and gas are unreliable and therefore useless. They produce electricity intermittently (only when the wind blows) and they require so much energy to build and maintain that they are energy negative. The energy required to build and maintain the wind turbines comes from oil, gas and coal.
10. Solar panels are also inefficient and unreliable. No electricity is produced by them when the sun is not out and this means that no electricity is produced at night. Solar panels require huge amounts of land and are remarkably inefficient. They require a good deal of energy to produce and install.
The myth of climate change is being promoted by a toxic mixture of rancid politicians, businessmen, celebrities and journalists – most of whom have a vested financial and political interest in selling their lies.
Most of those promoting the climate change myth are acting in their self-interest and not in the interest of the planet or the people. Indeed, their actions are directly opposed to the public good.
Everywhere you look the lies stand out.
The production of batteries to store electricity and the making of electric cars are a waste of time, money and energy and they require the building and running of massive mines in order to find and dig up the minerals required.
The evidence proves conclusively that electric cars are considerably more damaging to the planet than cars driven by internal combustion engines. The self-righteous bleatings of those promoting, making, selling and using electric cars would be pitiful if they were not so dangerous and damaging.
If you want to know the startling truth about climate change please read ‘Greta’s Homework’ by Zina Cohen.
If you want to know more about oil, and why it is so essential, please read ‘A Bigger Problem than Climate Change: The End of Oil’ by Vernon Coleman.
Both books are available on Amazon.
Featured image: “World leaders are relying even more heavily on the market to save us from a catastrophic 4-degree centigrade warming,” Global Dialogue, 2014
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
WE URGENTLY NEED YOUR HELP…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
Categories: Breaking News, World News
I went to a climate meeting in Bovey Tracy, it was changed changed to sustainability as we seated!!!. Well presented, a soft sell on Communism presented by Prof David Griggs a mild mannered pleasant man. I challenged him on the mechanism for CO2 and infrared photons which I have a sound understanding of, explaining my position in detail.
Rather than engage it was denial of the data and that CO2 had not yet reached saturation. Well on a log scale it never will but after experiments showed no further increase in temperature over 340ppm its fair to discount CO2 from any real further activity. CO2 can not make a climate emergency.
He closed his position by asking did I know better than all the climate scientists in the World? An appeal to consensus and I expected better than this showing his own understanding.
What good would “engaging” have done? You’d have just spewed your opinion at him and he’d have spewed his at you. As he has all the power and you have none it doesn’t make any difference what you think or say. Instead of picking fights with the people who run your life, remove them. Or is that too much effort? After all, they’ve made damn sure that they have all the guns…
Its not my opinion Lucy but a rebuttal with verified data. Even Prof Micheal Manns Pen University experiment is written up confirming no measurable heat discovered at 340ppm. Prof Happer and 1400 scientists in Clintel are right.
As to trouble, this will be for others soon. I’m 87 in a fortnight and not a street fighter.
“He closed his position by asking did I know better than all the climate scientists in the World?”
Well, you subscribe to this idea that “science” knows all, and you even quote the “scientists” that agree with you, so why don’t you answer your own question?
All this arguing over “co2” is yet more BS. The problem can be nailed down to one simple fact: there are too many humans. They’re a plague. And it’s only ever going to get worse. You don’t care of course, as long as you get to live in comfort with your child benefit and your pension payouts. But it ain’t so rosy for those in the slave pits and the slums. They want change, whereas you don’t. They don’t want to be your slave for their entire lives, whereas you want them to be your absolute slave from birth to death, all the while claiming otherwise. You’re all just a lesser tentacle of the beast.
Respectfully suggest you follow through on your hysterical contention that ‘humans” and “plague” are related.
Nothing is certain or proven in science, what I do have is a solid rebuttal of the CO2 hypothesis supported by experiments.
It’s not possible for CO2 to act as claimed by IPCC.
I have never drawn any benefits, or even unemployed pay.
You suggest reducing the Global population is the only answer? Convince me by jumping, and I may follow your courageous lead.
No. The only humane solution is population reduction via a global cycling 7-year birth-stop followed by a year when births are allowed until populations stabilize below the 529 million service limit determined by the Earth itself.
Please see “Interpretation of the Population Table 2009” that arrives at a Service capacity of 563 million.
In the UK 20 years ago, the population was going down.
I remember thinking, well that sounds good, everything will last longer. Meaning roads, motorways, drains, sewage systems and local pubs.
So what happened ?, the aliens who run our Country, let in another 20 million people.
What do you think to that ?
Agree there are 19x too many humans for the Earth service capacity of 529 million humans.
The “Interpretation of the Population Table 2009” calculates the Earth service capacity to be 563 million.
Always, always mention the Earth’s service capacity in future responses.
Currently trace gasses make-up 0.1% of atmospheric composition. 93% of that 0.1% trace gases comprises CO2.
The current 9.25 human exhalations contain more CO2 than emitted by all vehicle emissions.
When CO2 content in the atmosphere exceeds 8%, all life on the planet will perish!
The problem is not just CO2 emissions by via combustion alone, but also the increasing human populations that are already 19 times in excess of the Earth’s population service capacity that the “Interpretation of the Population Table 2009” calculates as 563 million.
The heat retained via CO2 accumulation in the atmosphere cannot compare to the heat entering the atmosphere in real time while burning inert fuels as described by the Carnot cycle where 60 – 80% of the energy is released into the atmosphere and the remaining energy is used to do work.
“Commonest Lies told by Climate Change Psychos”
More unbiased “journalism” by lucy. “Climate change” is just another way to fleece you of money, but as none of you rich gits will be affected, I fail to see why you care. Don’t tell me, eveyone will starve? Or will we all be locked in “smart” cities? As hardly anyone reads this nonsense anymore it hardly matters, but ask yourself why lucy keeps writing this bait…
“Commonest Lies told by Climate Change Psychos”
More unbiased “journalism” by you know who. “Climate change” is just another way to fleece you of money, but as none of you rich gits will be affected, I fail to see why you care. Don’t tell me, eveyone will starve? Or will we all be locked in “smart” cities? As hardly anyone reads this nonsense anymore it hardly matters, but ask yourself why you know who keeps writing this stuff…
B.W. Newton (1807-1899) writing about events that happened in Italy (circa 1850) under the reign of Victor Emmanuel II:
“Storm, tempest, and devastating floods had visited Rome. The Tiber had overflowed its banks, and was rushing through the streets of the city. Famished and homeless multitudes were wandering in search of food and shelter; but there was no kindly care extended, no voice to direct, no hand to succour. On a dark and stormy night, summoned by their cry of anguish, the new Monarch of Rome entered. As soon as the morning dawned he went forth to view the scene, and took his stand in front of the Capitol, there to inaugurate his reign.”
p. 371 Aids To Prophetic Enquiry.
An apocalyptic scene indeed! The fault of man-made climate change no doubt!
But wait! If my memory serves me rightly, this was before airplanes and cars were invented!
Great Report…Complete Truth. Hope you get widespread exposure with this one. Do you mind if I take this tomorrow and place it on a Substack. THIS ONE IS THE CORE OF THE FALLACY ALLOWING FOR ALL ELSE HAPPENING IN THEIR WORLD COUP. Without it, all else is null and void, too.
Great article Wonder if it could be presented in a form that is easy to remember —like a song or limerick
We all remember ‘ there was a young man from Nantucket’ !
Just a thought
All subject matter dealing with the environment always lacks a discussion on the Earth’s human population service capacity. This has been addressed via “Interpretation of the Population Table 2009” that arrives at a Service capacity of 563 million. So the 500 million number for the Earth’s human population service capacity is a calculated number and not a feel-good number plucked from thin air. All articles on the environment by scientists never discus the Earth’s human population service capacity and the destructive machinations of the current 9.25 billion human population that is 19 times the service capacity of the Earth.
3-Blade Wind and Solar are designed to fail technologies that could not exist with government subsidies (tax-payer expense).
A safe clean inexpensive climate benefiting energy solution is already available via the large 100 – 500 MW JMCC WING to provide for all the electrical needs for the planet indefinitely. This technology can also be deployed at sea to harvest the constantly blowing wind to produce power for electrolysis to extract oxygen and hydrogen fuel from sea water. Inert fuel power plants can remain as back-up.
The climate change hysteria has two solutions that work together:
As a result of the over-population that is currently about 19 times the Earth’s service capacity, the Earth peak service capacity of 2 billion has been reduced 73% to its current service capacity of 529 million.
CR825 makes clear that the Earth’s service capacity is declining:
In CR843, BEAM (Billy Eduard Albert Meier) states the population is already 19 times above service capacity:
The exhalation alone from the 9.25 billion humans on the planet already exceeds global CO2 vehicle emissions.
[…] Commonest Lies told by Climate Change Psychos […]
Group think Climate change that ignores Antarctic Volcanoes, aswell as Happer & Lindzen on unreliable computer modelling compared to real empirical datahttps://open.substack.com/pub/johnblundell/p/group-think-climate-change-that-ignores?r=1on9mb&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
dont for get the vulcanos under the pollar cap become active over thousands of years no mention of this in the media..ice drilled in Greeland proves the earth has heatted up many times before and yet again not onthe news cheers john