Breaking News

Electric vehicles are financing slave labour operations and destruction of the environment

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

If UK Councils have independently researched the environmental and social impact of making the batteries for the proposed electric bikes, scooters and buses then they are knowingly supporting slave labour and destruction of the environment. 

If they haven’t conducted their own research then “I was just following orders” will not save them from being accused of encouraging atrocities to be committed in their quest for unjustifiable “net zero.”


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Electric cars and renewable energy are not as “green” as they appear. Production of raw materials like lithium, cobalt and nickel that are essential to these technologies are often ruinous to land, water, wildlife and people.

To extract lithium, a single mine can use over 5 thousand tons of sulphuric acid per day, Rachel Mathews told the Colchester City Council on 6 June.

To remove the acid, over 3,000 gallons of water are used per minute.  Every year, that single mine produces over 350 million cubic yards of permanent waste laced with sulphuric acid and radioactive uranium.  And they anticipate what’s left of the water supply, in the area indigenous people rely on, could be contaminated for an estimated 300 years.

Mathews pointed out that Cobalt is also required for rechargeable batteries. There’s an enormous invasion of the human rights of the people in the Democratic Republic of Congo (“DRC”) as well as massive environmental destruction and toxic contamination relating to the mining of cobalt.  Slavery and child labour are alive and thriving in the DRC in the cobalt mines. Anyone with a rechargeable gadget is an unwilling participant in this horror but we don’t have to be.

It isn’t possible to “use ethically produced batteries” as the Council has suggested, Matthews said in the Council meeting on 6 June, “because 70% of Cobalt is mined using child labour which is mixed in at the factories with the 30% that isn’t.”

She quoted from the author of the book ‘Cobalt Red’ and slavery researcher Professor Siddharth Kara from Harvard University.  “Professor Kara who visited these supposedly audited eco mines in the Congo where children work and die in unimaginably awful conditions says”:

There is no clean cobalt. There is not a single company on planet Earth that makes a device that has a rechargeable battery in it that can reliably and justifiably claim that their cobalt isn’t coming from sources like that.

In the latest Council meeting held on 22 June, Mathews began:

“I’ve been a supporter of green energy and a keen environmentalist since my twenties … So, I was mortified to discover that a single lithium mine causes millions of tons of waste every year, laced with sulphuric acid and radioactive uranium polluting the water supply for 300 years. Not to mention the unacceptable human costs of child labour to mine cobalt.

“When I researched which solar panel to purchase, I did not, for one minute consider if it would be made by people trapped in razor-wire enclosed labour camps, being exposed to large quantities of quartz dust which causes silicosis!”

Below are the recordings of Mathews’ presentation to the Colchester City Council on 22 June followed by Carinna Cooper who raised the safety issues with electric vehicles and the need to be sure about what “climate change” actually is. “If you expect the public to willingly go along with losing our entire way of life, our livelihoods and our freedom, then you absolutely must conclusively prove it’s necessary. Anything less is insane,” she said.

You can download the transcripts for the presentations below as well as the previous meeting HERE.

Successful Garden Design: Round 4, Residents vs Colchester Council | Green Deception 22 June (15 mins)
Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

3 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
20 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Robbi
Robbi
10 months ago

This is addressing one of the prime pieces of evidence towards KNOWING THE ‘CLIMATE CHANGE OBSESSION/RELIGION’ is FALSE/PROPAGANDA/LIE…That the Marketplace is being DELIBERATELY AND FALSELY RE-DIRECTED TO ENRICH CHINA/CCP AS THAT IS THE WORLD GOVT. BUILT BY THE IMPERIALIST ROTHSCHILDS with the Central Banker Family Cartel which is preferred.

Absolute Power via DEPOPULATION AND SLAVERY with a ready ‘target-rich environment’ of human babies and children they view cattle to abuse, beat, neglect, rape, torture, eat, drink their mashed bodies or eat them as they scream…THAT’S THE REAL GOAL.

For the aliens from Hell in the U.S., EU, ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD willing to traffic babies, children, women, boys…Even some men; to use according to their evil, abominable, twisted, unspeakable horrors it’s a certainty slavery in Africa, China, Indonesia or anywhere is NOT A PROBLEM AT ALL. It could be argued that THIS IS THE REASON THE EVIL ARE SO GREEDY FOR POWER…To deliberately and openly TEAR INTO EVIL WITHOUT ANYBODY ABLE TO LEGALY ACT TO END IT.

john
john
Reply to  Robbi
10 months ago

Bravo.

Brin Jenkins
Brin Jenkins
10 months ago

I see a problem with lithium cells. If they are unbalanced in charging it can happen for a single cell to reverse polarity compounding these variations. This leads to heating and failure, and in large units the possibility of explosion as a charged is released like a bomb.

Better kept small and better managed not in vehicles.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Brin Jenkins
10 months ago

I think it was for the reason you mention that a Norwegian ferry company recently banned electric vehicles. EV’s have batteries as long as the vehicle itself-should an imbalance occur, the potential for an explosion is real! Petrol/diesel cars as you know have a battery the size of a shoebox, so any explosion could be dealt with quickly by a deckhand with a fire extinguisher, but an EV battery?

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Islander
10 months ago

I don’t possess a 5G handset-I didn’t progress beyond my Nokia 6310i, now some 22 years old, and still works absolutely fine. I have replaced batteries, screens, and various bits and pieces over the years, just like I have repaired household appliances and cars. It can be taken apart and mended unlike the 5G handset’s, which I understand are somewhat factory sealed. In fact, I have read they cannot be dismantled, and to attempt to do so is “dangerous”!

Now, why is this?

Who would want one of these nefarious devices, as ‘good’ as they otherwise are, if this be the case?

I have read that they will explode, as they contain materials that react to a certain frequency, but what do I know?

john
john
10 months ago

Yesterday I emailed the local council. Suffice to say, I am still waiting for a reply:
It appears you scam artists and fraudsters don’t give up.
First it was the scamdemic whereby the last report was over 600 million innocent people either dead or seriously maimed from the bio-weapon.
Followed by the mass installation of 5G towers which have exacerbated those deaths and injuries to some extent, while continuing to cause death and degradation to the human body, nature and the planet.
Now we have the climate change scam which has been outed by many sources as just another fraud.
In all 3 cases, driven by greed and profit at the expense of Life.
Can you rebut this professors claims?
https://watch.adh.tv/cpac-2022/season:2/videos/cpac-2022-prof-ian-plimer

Anonymous
Anonymous
10 months ago

Of coursexEverybsciebtific advance touted as being better always ALWAYS turns out to be worse. Eg going from using wood for heating to coal then to oil then to gas and now to reverse cycle air-conditioning which is pure evil. And the new gases are not just flammable but EXOSIVE. Picture that in a city housing high rise during a war scenario..

trackback
10 months ago

[…] Electric vehicles are financing slave labour operations and destruction of the environment […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]

biggrump
biggrump
10 months ago

Neither wind turbines, solar panels nor electric vehicles are what one would call green. Vast amounts of fossil fuels are needed for their raw materials and for their manufacture. Add to that, the lack of being able to recycle many of their parts. (eg batteries and turbine blades) Wind power and solar are not reliable and electric vehicles are often written off, even in minor accidents if the battery is damaged. Fossil fuels by comparison are reliable and much more efficient. The climate hoax is all about control of the ordinary person. Their policies are about restricting freedom of movement by pricing cars that will be too expensive to own by all but the rich self appointed rulers of the world. Democracy is almost a thing of the past because what passes for democracy these days is rule by diktat.

Watcher Seeker
Watcher Seeker
10 months ago

“To extract lithium, a single mine can use over 5 thousand tons of sulphuric acid per day, Rachel Mathews told the Colchester City Council on 6 June.” – when they have an agenda to fulfil, facts don;t matter.

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
10 months ago

The sheep still think its about the climate!!

trackback
10 months ago

[…] Electric vehicles are financing slave labour operations and destruction of the environment If UK Councils have independently researched the environmental and social impact of making the batteries for the proposed electric bikes, scooters and buses then they are knowingly supporting slave labour and destruction of the environment. […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] Electric vehicles are financing slave labour operations and destruction of the environmentIf UK Councils have independently researched the environmental and social impact of making the batteries for the proposed electric bikes, scooters and buses then they are knowingly supporting slave labour and destruction of the environment. […]

UltrZero
UltrZero
6 months ago

Major Study Reveals Alarming True Cost of Owning an EV, ‘Fueling’ Equal to $17.33 Per Gallon

https://www.westernjournal.com/overcharged-major-study-reveals-alarming-true-cost-owning-ev-fueling-equal-17-33-per-gallon/

trackback
4 months ago

[…] Electric vehicles are financing slave labour operations and destruction of the environment […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Les véhicules électriques financent le travail forcé et la destruction de l’environnement […]