Opinion Pages

The Problem with Smart Meters -Worldwide Testimonies

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

On Tuesday 5th Sep 2023 the UK Parliament quietly approved a bill clearing the way towards forcing British citizens to have smart meters installed in their homes and for individual electrical appliances including; fridges, dishwashers, and washers to be fitted with smart functions (Source). The key to smart functionality is that these appliances can be operated externally “in response to load signals” which means that smart meters will soon allow for your energy to be rationed remotely or even cut off completely according to the Smart Tyranny coalition [Source]

Essential Upgrade

We are being put into a position where it will be hard to refuse as the state has plans to force non-compliant residences into having a smart meter installed or face a £15,000 fine. “The replacement of traditional gas and electricity meters with smart meters is an essential national infrastructure upgrade for Great Britain” we are told by the government which is promoting the use of a smart meter as a money-saving device. (source).

This may have enticed the 33 million homes and small businesses in Britain that already have smart and advanced meters installed, but individuals have felt pressured into having them due to relentless overzealous electricity providers who have been working to reach their companies’ “binding annual installation targets” to roll out smart and advanced meters since 2022.

Now their focus is on installing the smart meters in the remaining “non-smart” customers by the end of 2025, which can only mean they will now have to ramp up the pressure for us all to have them against our will.

They Do Not Deliver

Utility companies claim that smart meters deliver benefits to consumers — like access to more data, better services, and cost and energy savings through data analysis. And yet, reports from around the world repeatedly suggest that smart meters aren’t delivering on these promises, failing to make an impact on energy use.

One example, in the Netherlands, consumers are barely saving 1 percent on their energy bill — far under the projected amount.

Catastrophic Health Effects

Failing to deliver benefits is one thing — but smart meter radiation also comes with significant health and safety concerns. Smart meters are responsible for “catastrophic effects” on the health of individuals and animals, surely it is down to the individual to choose to take that risk just to save a few pounds?

Unsurprisingly, the government’s “Smart Meters guide for households” states that in fact there is “no evidence that the meters pose any risk to health” (source). We know there is.

They also claim that radio waves are likely to be “much lower than other everyday devices such as our mobile phones,” Again this is untrue.

Senior Nuclear Policy Lecturer at UCSC, Daniel Hirsch, is reported to have found that smart meters “can emit intense pulses of radiation more than 14,000 times EACH DAY.” has determined that wireless meters emit 100-150 times the radiation of a cell phone, thus, invalidating utility claims that the radiation is insignificant. (source)

That is just with the standard smart meters and reportedly they’re not as bad as smart meters in the narrowband mesh network. These new smart meters have to continuously emit EMF to keep up with the data transfer demands, according to the Sheild Your Body group.

This means we will be constantly exposed to EMF emissions, which can result in a range of health problems (source)

Of course, this is known to numerous health bodies, for example, according to the American Cancer Society “RF radiation is a possible carcinogen, and smart meters give off RF radiation, it is possible that smart meters could increase cancer risk.”

Even the World Health Organisation has declared that “Non-ionizing radiation of the kind emitted by smart meters is a class 2B carcinogen – the same category as DDT, based on cell phone brain tumor studies”

Also, an article in the peer-reviewed Journal of Neuroscience concluded that “EMF hypersensitivity can occur as a bona fide environmentally-inducible neurological syndrome.”

There is undoubtedly lots more, but importantly consumer experience has more than shown the dangers of having a smart meter installed, why are they being ignored?

The Task Force

On January 5, 2023, Arthur Firstenberg, from Cellular Phone Task Force wrote that five weeks previously, he had asked people to email the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission (PRC) about their experiences with smart meters.

What he received in response he described as “heartbreaking testimonies” that poured in from around the world, which included stories about “catastrophic effects on the health and lives of adults, children, the elderly, pets, farm animals, birds, wild animals, insects, worms, plants, neighbors, workers and entire communities.”

Below are excerpts and summaries of some of the 271 testimonies that are posted on the public comments page of the PRC’s website.

The Smart Meter Testimonies

Jennifer Andree is a New Mexico resident who was severely injured by a smart meter “that has completely devastated my life.” She is a nurse and a veteran who knew nothing about smart meters until she was injured by one. This occurred on Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico. “For three and one-half months,” she writes, she slept with her head approximately one foot away on the other side of a wall from an electrical panel containing two electric smart meters. “Anything that carries an electric current or emits any radiation” now causes her headaches, brain fog, and internal burning.

“I can no longer tolerate living in an urban environment,” she writes, “so I have moved to South Dakota, to a cleaner environment in the country. Because of the harms I was exposed to, I am separated from my family, which has contributed to my suffering… I have a nursing license, but can no longer work in my profession.”

Maryann McCabe writes from the UK: “From the time [the smart meter] was turned on, I could not walk around in my flat, I could not write an email, I could not think and I could not sleep. It was an absolute nightmare until it was switched off.”

Harriet Greene, formerly of New Mexico, writes: “I was able to opt out and keep my old meter. Everybody I talk to who was forced to accept smart meters has complained of numerous effects.”

Lauren Bond writes, “Smart meters were installed in my building, and the radiation they emit inside apartments creates for myself, a constant burning pain to my skin.”

Jeanne Thompson writes from California: “My mother died of a massive brain tumor caused by a row of six Smart Meters outside her condo, on the wall where the head of her bed was. We discovered this after she had already passed. You can imagine my shock and horror at that realization.”

Dr. Linda Thomas writes, “I have seen hideous debility in adults and children secondary to Smart Meters being installed in my area.” These include absence seizures in a 2-year-old boy and chronic fatigue and fibromyalgia in his mother.

Mario Desira writes from Malta: “Back in 2017 my electrical meter caught fire and nearly caused a house fire. Luckily I was at home and intervened before anything worse happened.”

Persephone Maywald writes from California that she was diagnosed with suspected Parkinson’s disease a few months after a smart meter was installed, and that she later had the meter replaced and within a few weeks all her symptoms disappeared.

Simone St. Clare writes from California that since a smart meter was installed, there have been almost no hummingbirds at her feeders and a decrease in caterpillars in her garden.

Deirdre Novella writes from New York that her hair started falling out within a few months of a smart meter being installed at her place of work, that she was diagnosed with leukemia, and that she developed a lifelong allergy to electricity.

Sheila Reavill, who works as an electromagnetic radiation specialist (“EMRS”) in Georgia, writes that after smart meters were installed, “the smart meter signature I logged [on her radio frequency meter] in my bedroom was at the precise times I wake up at night”; that her next door neighbor and her neighbor’s daughter wake at the exact same time she does every night; that her border collie began having skin problems and would wake up whimpering at the exact same time also; and that she and her dog both wake up at that same time with diarrhea.

Rebeca Randle writes from California that while she had a smart meter she could not sleep and there were no birds; and that when the smart meter was removed, the birds came back.

Robert Workmanan EMRS in Missouri, writes: “I have confirmed injuries from wireless radiation and the Smart meter seems to be the most damaging to me and my clients. Once the ITRON electronic meter is removed many of my clients have an immediate response to an improved health. This meter has been torture to myself and others in St Louis, it is my professional opinion this meter kills all biological life.”

Health practitioner Diane Peterson writes from California that “For the majority [of people], they suddenly developed symptoms and only later discovered that the symptoms began immediately after the smart meter was installed.”

Sema Kelly writes: “My friend’s neighbor had a smart meter put in. She didn’t know it had such dangers, but soon found out her chickens in the yard had huge tumors growing on their throats and body. The eggs they laid were odd shapes and colors, and the chickens appeared to be tired, which was not ever seen prior to the installments of the smart meters.”

Andre Fayolle writes that a smart meter gave his family headaches, caused the animals, birds and insects to disappear, and caused a fire that burned down his house.

Karen Crenshaw writes from California that she had no knowledge of the dangers of smart meters until an Itron smart meter was installed on her house, after which she awoke abruptly every hour during the night, had uncomfortable ear sensations, acquired high-pitched tinnitus, and felt pressure in her chest.

Annette Lillig writes from the UK: “Everyone I know who [has a smart meter] has been negatively affected by them.”

Beverly Jennings writes: “In Capitola, CA an entire bank of smart meters burst into flames and started a fire and burned down an apartment complex.”

Margaretha Tierney writes from Australia that she became sick two weeks after a smart meter was installed and was sick for five years until she had it moved off her house.

Sarah Wild writes that she had heart palpitations, headache, and panic until her smart meter was removed. She writes that her 80-year-old neighbor “went from being extremely lively, active, outward-going to hobbling around and forgetful within 6 months” of a smart meter being installed and died within 18 months.

Dino DeBenetti writes from Ontario, Canada that after a smart meter was installed, his wife’s health and behavior deteriorated, resulting in their divorce. He also writes that he has attempted to hatch fertile chicken eggs in an incubator in his house twice since the meter was installed, with over 20 fertile eggs each time, and not one egg hatched either time.

Karen Blomquist writes from California that when smart meters were installed on her home she incurred inner ear damage, sleeplessness, anxiety, non-stop heart palpitations, and migraines, and fled her home after two months to save her life. She also reports that her pets all got cancer and passed away.

Tina Cada writes from Florida that although she opted out of a smart meter on her own home, “[o]n the day they were getting installed [in her neighborhood], I walked outside and had no idea where I was. I had the worst kind of disorientation. This reaction was ongoing and lasted for the first few months.” She reports vertigo attacks that have continued, and constant dry mouth, that her teenage son has dry mouth, headaches and sleep disruptions, that her neighbor’s dog suddenly got cancer and died after the smart meters were installed, that her cat started acting differently, and that all the bats disappeared.

Laurie Grams writes from Texas that she lives in an apartment complex and so could not opt out, and has had sleep problems and agitation since smart meters were installed.

Jennifer Wood writes from West Virginia that “I have literally known thousands of people over the past nine years or so who became so ill when smart meters were installed in their homes that they had to move just as I did.”

Elizabeth Foley Walsh writes from North Carolina that she knew nothing about smart meters until after one was installed in her home and she began having severe headaches, dizziness, and temporal lobe seizures the following week. She writes that she thought she was dying until she went camping one week and the symptoms disappeared; that her next door neighbor’s headaches began the same time hers did; that an elderly neighbor across the street began falling repeatedly immediately after their headaches began; and that when she finally moved to a location without a smart meter she “was stunned at the change in my health.” She observed that “the frogs disappeared the very summer after the smart meter went in”—the hundreds of frogs that previously inhabited the creek behind their back yard—and that all the house sparrows and starlings disappeared, and that squirrels were “suddenly tame and suddenly laying down ‘resting’ a lot. They seem to be panting and they seem to be sick.” She writes that she has had to leave an 18-year career in developmental epidemiology.

Rainer Grobe writes that on the same day a smart water meter was installed, his wife developed heart arrhythmia, very high blood pressure, and fainted, and that they had to remove the meter themselves, with both legal and financial consequences.

Kent Casady writes from Germany that he and his wife purchased a house with a smart meter, and when they moved in there were no insects, bees, butterflies or birds, and “[t]he dirt in the yard was dead.” After they had the smart meter removed, they had “earthworms in the soil, bees, butterflies, hummingbirds, spiders, and other creatures.”

Kimberly Webber, in Taos, New Mexico, writes that although they were able to opt out of a smart meter at their home, they were unable to opt-out at their place of business, and that “[w]e noticed agitation, irritability, depression, headaches, ear ringing and other symptoms from ourselves and our employees while in the work space.” They moved their business to a new location without a smart meter and “[a]ll of the symptoms have disappeared for us and our team.”

Ellen Habeck writes: “Until I researched the matter, I could not understand why I had such fragmented sleep, and would wake with severe tachycardia. I thought my heart would beat out of my chest. There was not sleep and no ability to function well in the morning after that.” Finally, “I looked and found the place I had moved to had a smart meter outside the bedroom wall.” She adds: “There is a neighbor who asked me why she thought she would feel unwell when working for hours in a particular room in her house. She also noted that any plants she put in that room died, where they had been thriving in other rooms. I looked and saw there was a smart meter directly on the other side of the wall of that room where she sat, and a neighbor’s smart meter pointing at fairly close proximity to that room.”

Arlene Griffin is a Santa Fe resident who briefly lived in southern California in 2019-2020. She writes: “I had no history of heart problems, but upon moving into a house in a development in San Diego County, I was jolted awake every night, feeling like what it would be like to be hit with defibrillator paddles. Once awake, my heart would alternate between pounding, racing, and skipping beats for the rest of the night, and I would shake for hours. I also developed eye issues—my eyes burned and were red and swollen. Each day I would feel better when I left our house, but each night the horrible symptoms would return. It was terrifying and exhausting… We hired an inspector who tested our house for RF/EMF radiation and found that the high readings were not coming from our property (we had an analog meter), but from our neighbor’s house. It so happened that her meter directly faced our bedrooms… Finally, in September 2020 I returned to New Mexico for good, and I have not had those heart symptoms here.”

Stephanie Dickerson writes from North Carolina that she is “currently suffering every single day and especially nights from the newly installed” smart meters in her neighborhood, and that “I have been forced from 3 previous home locations because of smartmeter installations… My heart rate has become dangerously high, my body temperature can not regulate, I experience constant vibrating in my torso and in my legs, my brain function has deteriorated and I can not sleep at all. This physical response to the newly installed smartmeters is life-threatening to me.”

Brenda Rogers writes from California that she “had to leave my home in a camper to find somewhere I could sleep” because of a smart meter, and that she had to abandon her home of 30 years.

Catherine Ralston lives in Taos. “A smart meter was put in at my address,” she writes. “I started having trouble sleeping at night. I started having headaches. I stopped waking up happy. My emotions were flatline. This happened quickly, over a couple of weeks. Someone told me about symptoms showing up in people after smart meters were installed where they live. I went looking for the smart meter. Then I moved my bed to a location in the building as far from the meter as I could put it, and slept with my head at the end of the bed furthest from the meter location. I slept through the night, and woke with no headache. I do not own the property and the owner won’t work with the electric company to give back the old meter. I feel blessed someone told me about the horrible impact the smart meters have on human health.”

Glenn Kikel moved to New Mexico from Colorado. He writes that when a smart meter was installed on their Colorado house, he developed tinnitus and his wife developed heart palpitations, and that both health problems ceased when the meter was moved.

Diane Craig writes that she “experienced severe tinnitus, tremors, short-term memory issues, and an area at the back of my neck at the base of my skull that was hot to my husband’s touch” in a 4-hour period after a smart meter was installed 10 feet beyond the head of her bed. They paid for opt-outs for both themselves and a neighbor in order to be well, she writes.

Alvita Armanavičienė, from Latvia, submitted this startling photograph of a bush standing just inches away from a smart meter:

Simone Bercu writes that she and her family left their homes in other states to come to New Mexico five years ago to escape smart meters. “The smart meters were devastating our small children and ourselves and the effects are still noticeable,” she writes.

Annie Mattingly, of Santa Fe, writes, “My daughter, living in another state, was away when a Smart Meter was installed on her house. Within days of her healthy arrival home, she became ill and now, several years later, she is still plagued with health issues and is only partially functional.”

M. L. writes from Pennsylvania: “When our meter started transmitting, I noticed two birds that had died within approximately 25 feet of it.”

Lukas Zillmer writes: “I have personal experience of bad sleep, waking up at night, waking up still tired from being exposed to the radiation by smart meters which made life almost unbearable.”

Simone Prince writes from British Columbia, Canada that her cat developed hyperthyroidism when a smart meter was installed on her townhouse, and that she herself changed from hypothyroidism to hyperthyroidism at the same time.

Arthur Firstenberg wrote: If you have stories to add and you have not yet sent them to the PRC, please email them to: New Mexico PRC <prc.records@prc.nm.gov>. Write “Case No. 22-00058-UT” in the Subject line. Be sure to also send a copy to me at Arthur@cellphonetaskforce.org. We need all the help we can get to preserve New Mexico as a refuge from smart meters, and as an example to the world. 

Arthur Firstenberg
President, New Mexicans for Utility Safety
President, Cellular Phone Task Force.

————————————————————————

We are one huge step closer to totalitarian control which is evidenced by the government’s new bill. Despite knowing what is good for us and what is extremely dangerous, our dictatorship of a puppet government is determined to take away our right to choose whether to risk our health by having a smart meter installed just to save a couple of quid.

Welcome to the New World Order, expect more of this authoritarian harmful control.

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Opinion Pages

Tagged as:

4 4 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
30 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
7 months ago

Ac5ually they were sold 5o us here about 20 years ago as a privilege . But the bottom line is although mine was privately bought and pa8d for about 2000 dollars they still insist that itsxtheirs That the homeowner can only put their specified lock on it , that the meter owner can’t touch it or interfere with it 8n any way and only the author8ty can test it to see if its faulty No one else just them as if its their property all along. All by act of Parliament.

Abigail
Abigail
7 months ago

Thank you Patricia! This article is gold. People don’t care about difficult tech but care a lot about their already not so very good health. Now some probably will be able to identify the new mysterious illness/condition caused by these.

Watcher Seeker
Watcher Seeker
7 months ago

 About “just to save a couple of quid” – yes, they lied. All that talk of how they would save money was bluff.

If I put the kettle on to make a cup of tea, it won’t save money just because the stupid meter tells me that I’ve put the kettle on. The same for a fan heater or any other appliance.

So they lied. People could see that, so what they have done is rig the market so they now do save money – because the cheaper deals are available only to customers with stupid meters, and there is that scheme that pays people to not use electricity at certain times – but only if they have a stupid meter.

They have resorted to bribery, market rigging and corruption – and they are doing it in other ways too –

“Price of gas boilers could rise by as much as £300 under new government ‘green’ regime”.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12488077/Price-gas-boilers-rise-300-new-government-green-regime.html

In that article – the “Clean Heat Market Mechanism” – oh, a mechanism – it’s really a cover-up, bluff term for oppression and more taxation.

Watcher Seeker
Watcher Seeker
7 months ago

 About “just to save a couple of quid” – yes, they lied. All that talk of how they would save money was bluff.

If I put the kettle on to make a cup of tea, it won’t save money just because the st_upid meter tells me that I’ve put the kettle on. The same for a fan heater or any other appliance.

So they lied. People could see that, so what they have done is rig the market so they now do save money – because the cheaper deals are available only to customers with st_upid meters, and there is that scheme that pays people to not use electricity at certain times – but only if they have a st_upid meter.

They have resorted to brib_ery, market rigg_ing and corru_ption – and they are doing it in other ways too –

“Price of gas boilers could rise by as much as £300 under new government ‘green’ regime”.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12488077/Price-gas-boilers-rise-300-new-government-green-regime.html

In that article – the “Clean Heat Market Mechanism” – oh, a mechanism – it’s really a cover-up, bluff term for oppression and more taxation.

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]

Craig
Craig
7 months ago

These Elite cock suckers need to be gone for good

Jacqui Purcell
Jacqui Purcell
7 months ago

My friend had the next door flat with a smart meter behind her bed! She got cancer and died. The constant pulsed microwaves are very dangerous to people. I am electro sensitive and cannot have pulsed microwaves in any form. I have no wifi in my home because of this. Keep away from anything that is called “Smart”

vmontie
vmontie
Reply to  Jacqui Purcell
7 months ago

I have also heard stories of people getting cancer. If I had to move I would certainly check to see exactly WHERE the smrtmeter was located and then also place a ‘faruijie Smart Meter Cover’ over the meter. You can find them on Amzn. blessings.

Abigail
Abigail
Reply to  vmontie
7 months ago

100% affects fertility, too and the survival and formation of the child based on effect on cats.

Watcher Seeker
Watcher Seeker
Reply to  Jacqui Purcell
7 months ago

You can buy protective clothing –

https://www.vtechtextiles.com/rf-emi-shielding-garments-clothing/

https://radiasmart.com/

https://www.facebook.com/FaradayGear/

There are lots more, but do they work?

“Electromagnetic Shielding Properties of Knitted Fabric Made from Polyamide Threads Coated with Silver”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962651/

Abigail
Abigail
Reply to  Watcher Seeker
7 months ago

No. I am hypersensitive, no way you can protect your head. I have several protection tools but since the LED street lights were implemented (we also have 5G masts 300 meters away) I am almost as poorly as I was before shielding and having these tools (Q-Shield, chrystal pyramids, G-oyster, newest is a Spiro disk). Insomnia, no matter what I try I wake up after 3-4 hours, burning feelings, hormones messing, always exhausted, electric, tingling feelings, inflammations and weird hearing, I find normal noises extremely loud and irritating.. My husband hardly can walk, supplements doesn’t help. I see it on out pets, too. The area is dense, house is semi detached, probably neighbors have smart meters. There are spots in the garden where plants die, no matter they are in the soil or pot, these spots are close to the neighbors on both sides.

Weird things happen, my husband got ‘sunburned’ in the window at night in T-shirt, burned looking and swollen glands, but nothing was under waste line. I almost bleed out from the gut after washing the car (metal, water), the ‘marburg’ came out of nowhere, same spot the tree looks always dry and lost almost all the fruits, branches ‘shielded’ by another tree were full, despite of having less sun.

Cats had less kittens, then even from the less they lost one at / shortly after birth, malformations happened, we’ve never seen this. Also their behavior changed.
Neighbors’ also, 1-2 neighbors went totally mad compared to their old behavior with no good reason, they are different, nasty, aggressive.

One day I drove into the centre, wore a full rosequarz (beds) necklace based on it allegedly raises vibration, protective, at the centre which heavily dense with antennas and masts I felt a strong trembling at the seat, I thought something went wrong with the car but not, my husband later felt nothing on that seat, neither me later without the necklace but that they on the back way I felt it again while being close to the antennas, half km area or so.

To me the best working tool is the Q-Shield, but still not enough, if you are sensitive, you are screwed. But even if you not, foolish to think it has no effect on you. Several clients, especially elderly complained, ear ringing, vertigos, I also have vertigo, whenever the radiation is dense, airport 5G screening always causes it, starts 2-3 hours later and lasts 1-2 days. So bad I can’t unpack the luggage, just fall into the bed and sleep, next day it milder then goes away. Nothing happens if they send me trough the old type screening gate. Watch how they cherry pick women and girls to send into the 5G screening. In Europe I saw these 5G screening gates only in the UK, no one else uses them. The poor Dr Buttar told that he denied to go through in the US, every single time. I tried but the staff at Bham airport literally tried to torture me. (Freemasons?)

This tech is a killer. Sorry for the long comment, thought can be useful.

Abigail
Abigail
Reply to  Abigail
7 months ago

I’ve just downloaded this photo from phone, I thought I show it, this is how some tomatoes grew this year. I have a kitten with a dire malformation, he can’t walk but crawl on his first paws, he is not the first but the earlier cases were milder. Beautiful, wants to live, even tries to play, absolutely heart breaking to see him day by day, never be able to relax and forget about that we are poisoned badly!
Cats have fertility problems, kittens die right after birth or if not then some has malformations.

There must be a reason. They are on organic and free range diet, quality meat chopped by us, no canned junk food, the water is clear and this what we are experiencing since this April never happened. Back then we saw similar, it was because of a certain food heavy metal content, but that’s not the issue now.

There is no other explanation than e-smog and maybe the heavy chemtrailing’ effect.

tomato.jpg
ThinkAgain
ThinkAgain
Reply to  Abigail
7 months ago

Sorry to ask: do you keep your wifi on 24 hours? Is there any smart meters or electric outlets (dirty electricity) near where the mother cat/ kittens are located? Do you have any cordless phones for your landline phones? Do you share walls with neighbors who have all their electrics/wifi left on ? Any new cell/5G small mini frig devices newly attached to street lights or added to top of nearby tall buildings? Or new wireless tower installed within 1/2 mile? Otherwise it could be from the water, they have started adding fluoride into all UK water supplies, Parliament approved this about 3 years ago I think it was in the spring of 2020. Before only 10% of UK water supplied were fluoridated.

trackback
7 months ago

[…] – The Problem with Smart Meters -Worldwide Testimonies […]

vmontie
vmontie
7 months ago

Just REFUSE it if asked. They will try and scare you with extra monthly fees but that is questionable and with me it, was never charged. JUST SAY NO….and if you already have one call and ask that they remove it immediately and go back to the old one. But be bold and take back your control and your freedom.

Gw Wells
Gw Wells
7 months ago

prison camp expanding

Robbi
Robbi
7 months ago

Screw their ‘SMART’ everything. The FASCISTS out of ‘The City of London’ ran by the Rothschilds can take their lying B.S. after ROBBING THE WHOLE WORLD to the tune of hundreds of trillions, torture and murder and put it up their behinds.

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Read more: The Problem with Smart Meters -Worldwide Testimonies […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] The Problem with Smart Meters -Worldwide Testimonies  On Tuesday 5th Sep 2023 the UK Parliament quietly approved a bill clearing the way towards forcing British citizens to have smart meters installed in their homes and for individual electrical appliances including; fridges, dishwashers, and washers to be fitted with smart functions. The key to smart functionality is that these appliances can be operated externally “in response to load signals” which means that smart meters will soon allow for your energy to be rationed remotely or even cut off completely according to the Smart Tyranny coalition. […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] The Problem with Smart Meters -Worldwide Testimonies On Tuesday 5th Sep 2023 the UK Parliament quietly approved a bill clearing the way towards forcing British citizens to have smart meters installed in their homes and for individual electrical appliances including; fridges, dishwashers, and washers to be fitted with smart functions. The key to smart functionality is that these appliances can be operated externally “in response to load signals” which means that smart meters will soon allow for your energy to be rationed remotely or even cut off completely according to the Smart Tyranny coalition. […]

John Blundell
John Blundell
7 months ago

My template objection to Smart meters and all sources of 5G irradiation.
Not only Smart meters EMF Heath damage but all sources especially 5G masts and Routers.

EMF Helath damage Evidence validation.
ElectroMagnetic Field Radiation EMF impact on Health
EMF; Masts. Routers, Smart meters, 3G, 4G, 5G AI Devices, Overhead Power lines, Dirty electricity-(Carcinogenic Spikes).
5G technology is dangerous evidenced in multiple Scientific reviews.
I list the EMF health damage evidence.
The primary issue is what are the safe EMF exposure limits.
·        The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection ICNIRP guidelines are disputed based on short term EMF exposures that only looked at thermal effects. Currently increased from 10W/m² to 20W/m² when all Research studies suggest it should only be 3µW/m² as a million times less.
An ICNIRP as discredited with Conflict of Interest as biased Pro 5G and guidelines that can never exceed with levels well beyond any limit for 5G.
In effect 5G companies unfettered to then cause health damage to society.
 
·        Fishersgate mast in Brighton, quashed at Judicial Review
“the Council failed to address the health impacts of this particular proposal and to obtain adequate evidence of the assessment of the proximity to the school and the amended proposal.”
https://rfinfo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Consent-Order-02.11.21.pdf
Local Authority Planning Committee Councillors have to address in their planning decisions on proposed 5G Masts to make sure residents are not exposed to EMF health damage.
 
·        Local Authorities are now questioning the ICNIRP Guidelines as having failed to demonstrate that the proposal has complied with those ICNIRP Guidelines, and mast should be more than 500 mtrs away from residential areas.
 
·        ICNIRP fails to accept responsibility or liability for their Exposure Guidelines.
MHCLG to then impose those exposure Guidelines within their NPPF 114-118.
Neither of which accepts responsibility or liability if those Guidelines cause EMF health damage.
An ICNIR that disowns liability as only guidance yet there is 30,000 scientific papers that evidence health damage due to EMF radiation at million time less than their 20W/mtr2 at only 30µ W/mtr2.
 
·        ICNIRP self certification is invalid as there is no actual Authority certification.
Those ICNIRP EMF exposure guidelines have no certified validity.
 
·        ICNIRP EMF Guidelines have been found invalid as outdated.
Environmental Health Trust et. al versus the FCC, the US Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia found that the FCC had failed to review all relevant science as of 2019. 
ICNIRP Guidelines imposed by NPPF118 are out of date.
https://ehtrust.org/eht-takes-the-fcc-to-court/
https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/FB976465BF00F8BD85258730004EFDF7/$file/20-1025-1910111.pdf

·        Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G.
International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF)
https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-022-00900-9

There are flawed assumptions underlying ICNIRP Exposure Guidelines.
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G.
https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-022-00900-9
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13Xr2SZbMHaKspB1YCc5lpzJRrre9Bwd2/view

A case where no one is recording EMF health issue below guidelines and with ICNIRP only as thermal, not the non-thermal health impact.
·        Insurance Underwriters will not insure against EMF health Impact.
That includes LA Schools and their IT Departments.
Lloyds Insurers Refuse To Cover 5G Wi-Fi Illnesses
https://principia-scientific.org/lloyds-insurers-refuse-to-cover-5g-wi-fi-illnesses/
Lloyds underwriters CFC Underwriting Limited
http://emrabc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/InsuranceAEWordingCanadav17Feb2015.pdf
General Insurance Exclusions
Para32. Electromagnetic fields directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from or contributed to by electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic radiation, electromagnetism, radio waves or noise.
https://nowhere.news/index.php/2018/10/27/lloyds-refuses-liability-coverage-for-emf-radiation-exposure-mobile-phones/
http://themillenniumreport.com/2019/04/why-is-lloyds-of-london-excluding-coverage-for-5g/
Verizon warn shareholders of personal injury litigation through EMG radiation
https://ehtrust.org/key-issues/cell-phoneswireless/telecom-insurance-companies-warn-liability-risk-go-key-issues/
·        An international appeal to Stop 5G has of November 3, 2022, 302,720 people and organizations from 216 nations and territories that have signed this Appeal, including 4,471 Medical Doctors.
220 radiation scientists from 41 countries appealed to the United Nations to halt 5G.
The advice is to use the UNESCO Precautionary Principle and avoid the liability of an unproven, dangerous technology as demonstrated by other Countries that have called a halt to 5G.
https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal 

·        The United Nations Precautionary Principle is there to avoid catastrophic decisions being made that would cause unnecessary health hazard issues. The Asbestos catastrophe would never have happened if the Precautionary Principle had been used.
Councillors need to use that Precautionary Principle.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000139578

·        Roll out of 5G is an illegal experiment.
It is misleading to make a Planning application for one radio mast when the 5G technology requires Planning permission for most lampposts and poles in every street to require booster array antenna. Planning applications do not address the full scope of the proposal, and omits that street by street deployment requirement. There has been no documented research evidence as to the health hazard issues associated with 3,4,5G mobile phone radiation.5G is estimated to require 400,000 extra masts for a technology that has had no Public Health safety scrutiny or on visual impact. Local Authorities allowing one mast implies Yes to all those other unmentioned masts aswell as unmentioned thousands of trees cut down for street by street 5G booster array reception.

·        There has been no Environmental Impact Health and Safety Assessment and an override of all “normal” planning procedures to force 5G through as imposed without due diligence.
That causes an indemnity and liability for all those that imposed the technology without the required Duty of care for the Public
There has been no Environment Safety or Health Impact Assessment EIA conducted anywhere.
The UK Government needs to halt the 5G rollout until there is an unbiased independent assessment.
Where is the Environment Impact Assessment EIA in any 5G mast planning proposals?
Where is the Power Density assessment for the 5G mast?
Where is the Local Authority EIA documented evaluation that the proposal meets with safe Exposure Guidelines to not cause health damage?
The evidence confirms that ICNIRP EMF Guidelines are; a. outdated, b. not fit for purpose, c. does not consider non-ionising irradiation health impact, d. does not consider MiMO unmeasured pulsed focused beaming increased power densities, e. multiple research studies that prove ICNIRP relies on assumption not science, f. not only a self-selecting group, and collective “groupthink”, but also of known “conflict of interests in the telecoms industry as employed by them

Wireless Industry Confesses: “No Studies Show 5G is Safe”
Multiple links to Scientific evidence ignored in Items 32,33.
https://www.takebackyourpower.net/senate-hearing-wireless-industry-confesses-no-studies-showing-5g-safety/?fbclid=IwAR1w-mkJ4V5AZIjDK6MVeA4V5MJcPqteyynMtfPYj1jH0ToANT08tubdKL0
 
·        Fibre Optic Cable is a safer alternative
 
·        Electro-sensitive people are estimated at 3% high sensitivity, and 35% moderate sensitivity
A UK with 67 million population as 2,010,000 (3%) highly sensitive, and 23,450,000 (35%) with moderate sensitivity.
https://www.electrosensitivesociety.com/how-many-people-suffer-from-ehs/
 
·        Reliable disease biomarkers characterizing and identifying electrohypersensitivity and multiple chemical sensitivity as two etiopathogenic aspects of a unique pathological disorder. Dominique Belpomme, 2015
Both disorders appear to involve inflammation-related hyper-histaminemia, oxidative stress, autoimmune response, capsulothalamic hypoperfusion and BBB opening, and a deficit in melatonin metabolic availability; suggesting a risk of chronic neurodegenerative disease. Finally the common co-occurrence of EHS and MCS strongly suggests a common pathological mechanism.”
“We therefore, strongly propose that whatever their proofs for their causal origins, EHS and MCS should clearly be added to the next version of the WHO international classification of diseases (ICD) on the basis on their clinical and pathological description; as has been the case for many other diseases.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26613326/
Biomarkers are used to link laboratory determine physical ailment to EMF exposure.


·        Electrohypersensitivity as a Newly Identified and Characterized Neurologic Pathological Disorder: How to Diagnose, Treat, and Prevent It Dominique Belpomme Mar2020
Table10; Great Britain 4%67million UK x 4% as 2,680,000 with EHS.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Electrohypersensitivity-as-a-Newly-Identified-and-Belpomme-Irigaray/6230d144a185e6fb1d328a35bf8d1671d9a7d2cc

·        A new International Classification Disease Code W90-990.8 for EMF diseases.
The World Health Organization (WHO) recognizes EHS and states the following:
“ a phenomenon where individuals experience adverse health effects while using or being in the vicinity of devices emanating electric, magnetic, or electromagnetic fields (EMFs).”
“EHS is a real and sometimes a debilitating problem for the affected persons . . .
Their exposures are generally several orders of magnitude under the limits in internationally accepted standards.”
WHO Rapporteur’s Report 2006
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241594127
EU Report; Possible health implications of subjective symptoms and electromagnetic fields.
https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/handle/2077/4156/ah1997_19.pdf?sequence=1
 
·        EHS is a physiological response to electromagnetic frequencies and is not psychosomatic!
https://www.electrosensitivesociety.com/how-many-people-suffer-from-ehs/
·        How many people suffer from EHS?
https://www.electrosensitivesociety.com/how-many-people-suffer-from-ehs/
https://www.electrosensitivesociety.com/ehs/
Peer Reviewed Scientific Research on Wireless Radiation
https://ehtrust.org/science/research-on-wireless-health-effects/
Selected Studies On Electrosensitivity (Es) And Electromagnetic Hyper-Sensitivity (Ehs)
https://www.es-uk.info/research/
https://www.es-uk.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Selected%20ES%20and%20EHS%20studies.pdf
·        Significant harm to the character and appearance of the area
There is also precedent that 5G masts inappropriately positioned in residential areas causes significant visual detriment to the vernacular and a “carbuncle eyesore uglification” for all to see.
A similar precedent occurred in Coventry where Planning Inspector refused the application
“But a planning inspector appointed by the government sided with the council and dismissed the appeal in September. Her report concluded that “in the circumstances of this case, national and local policy support for a high quality digital communications network does not outweigh the harm to the character and appearance of the area.”
https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/local-news/joy-5g-mast-monstrosity-removed-25433876

·        Visual detriment
All Planning needs to weigh that Coventry Planning inspectorate finding that “high quality digital communications network does not outweigh the harm to the character and appearance of the area.”.
The NPPF114-118 is outweighed in a 5G mast application by visual detriment harm to the character of the area.
The position of a 5G mast is out of context as visual detriment with harm to the character of the area.

·        Local Authorities are now realising the health issues with 5G Monopoles, and Towers in proximity to residential areas.
No EMF is safe, and especially within 500mtrs-1000mtrs.
The height, size and position of the Mast causes visual detriment impact as in congruous to the visual vernacular surroundings.
i.e. An “eyesore”. A “carbuncle” that diminishes quality of life for all residents.
Objectors block 5G mast ‘monstrosity’ from Derbyshire town 7/Oct/2022
“People power claimed victory as planning permission was refused for the 17-metre mast”
https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/news/local-news/objectors-block-mast-monstrosity-derbyshire-7677303

·        United Nations; Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Infringements;
Residents have the right to choose whether they are exposed to EMF, or not.
Proposal for masts infringes that right.
There is no right to impose health damaging EMF irradiation 24/7 on residents.
Article 3; Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
Article 12; No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence,
https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
A 5G mast proposal as imposed 24/7 irradiation, infringes the Human Rights of residents to life, security of person, and as arbitrary interference in their privacy, and family life.
The Evidence
1. Dr Martin Pall evidences multiple correlated research papers with 139 Appendices to evidenced EMF radiation health impacts.
Dr Martin Pall 5G: Great risk for EU, U.S. and International Health!
“We know that there is a massive literature, providing a high level of scientific certainty, for each of eight pathophysiological effects caused by non-thermal microwave frequency EMF exposures.
This is shown in from 12 to 35 reviews on each specific effect, with each review listed in Chapter1 providing a substantial body of evidence on the existence of each effect.”
5G: Great risk for EU, U.S. and International Health! Compelling Evidence for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them
Written and Compiled by Martin L. Pall, PhD Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences
1. Attack our nervous systems including our brains leading to widespread
neurological/neuropsychiatric effects and possibly many other effects. This nervous system attack is of great concern.
2. Attack our endocrine (that is hormonal) systems. In this context, the main things that make us functionally different from single celled creatures are our nervous system and our endocrine systems – even a simple planaria worm needs both of these. Thus the consequences of the disruption of these two regulatory systems is immense, such that it is a travesty to ignore these findings.
3. Produce oxidative stress and free radical damage, which have central roles in essentially
all chronic diseases.
4. Attack the DNA of our cells, producing single strand and double strand breaks in cellular
DNA and oxidized bases in our cellular DNA. These in turn produce cancer and also mutations in germ line cells which produce mutations in future generations.
5. Produce elevated levels of apoptosis (programmed cell death), events especially important in causing both neurodegenerative diseases and infertility.
6. Lower male and female fertility, lower sex hormones, lower libido and increased levels of spontaneous abortion and, as already stated, attack the DNA in sperm cells.
7. Produce excessive intracellular calcium [Ca2+]i and excessive calcium signalling.
8. Attack the cells of our bodies to cause cancer. Such attacks are thought to act via 15 different mechanisms during cancer causation
https://www.radiationresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/EU-EMF2018-6-11US3.pdf?fbclid=IwAR15aUqMyBw462xXgMHXbshj3iBeUDiEBvGql6KkEVE_o-e8syCkRCW_9UE
A Mechanism for Health Impacts of Electromagnetic Fields. Martin Pall


2. Dr Martin Pall lecture defining the multiple research paper evidence.
5G roll out is absolutely insane! Lecture that defines the various EMF pathways via excessive Reactive Oxygen/Nitrogen Species ROS RNS, as excessive Free radicals to cause Cancers via EMF resonance.
Martin Pall To The NIH: “The 5G Rollout Is Absolutely Insane”.
Current US/international safety guidelines are based on only thermal (heating) effects, but many non-thermal effects occur at levels orders of magnitude lower than those allowed by these guidelines. 07/08/2018
Lowered fertility (18 different reviews).
Changes in the testes, ovaries, lowered sperm count, and quality, lowered number of follicles (eggs), increased spontaneous abortion, lowered levels of each of the 3 sex hormones, lowered libido.
Neurological/Neuropsychiatric effects (25 review)
Insomnia, fatigue, depression, headache, lack of concentration/cognitive dysfunction, anxiety/stress, agitation, memory dysfunction. Major changes to the brain structure seen in animals.
Cellular DNA damage 3 types (21 reviews)
Single and Double DNA breaks, oxidized bases (8-HOdG) cause both cancer and germ-line mutation.
Apoptosis, programmed cell death (13 reviews)
Lead to both reproductive and neurodegenerative effects.
Oxidative stress, free radical damage (19 reviews).
Slide3;
Endocrine (hormonal effects) (12 different reviews)
Both non-steroid and steroid hormone systems affected, in some cases Electromagnetic Field radiation can produce both increased and decreased hormone activity under different conditions.
Excessive intracellular calcium [CA2+]I (15 reviews)
Insomnia, and generally the root of almost everything else
Cancer (35 reviews)
Increases initiation of carcinogenesis, tumour promotion and progression, including increased tissue invasion and metastasis. (secondary sites)
Pulsed EMF radiation in most cases are much more biologically active than are non-pulsed, continuous wave EMFs (13 reviews). Because all wireless communication devices communicate via pulsations, they are potentially and I believe actually much more dangerous
Slide4;
There are four other probable effects with less evidence than the overwhelming evidence shown above. These are;
1. Cardiac effects via electrical control to the heart. You can get instantaneous tachycardia, chronic exposures often cause bradycardia; both cause arrhythmia, also get heart palpitations.
2. Very early onset Alzheimer’s and other dementias.
We are seeing people age30 developing Alzheimer’s and even younger people developing digital dementia.
3,4. Both ADHD and autism may be caused by late prenatal and early post-natal EMF exposure.
There are four mechanism that control the synapse formation in the developing brain, each of which are controlled by intracellular calcium [Ca2+]i. It follows that the excessive [Ca2+]I following EMF exposure can disrupt synapse formation, causing ADHD and autism via that mechanism.
Slide5,6;
There are four reasons why EMFs are much more active in children than in adults;
1. Children have higher surface to volume ratio, such that their tissues are much more exposed to EMFs.
This may be particularly important in the head where thinner skulls mean brain exposure are much higher.
2. Children have very high density of stem cells which are particularly sensitive to EMFs.
3. The developing brain appears to be especially sensitive to EMFs.
4. Young tissues have much greater extracellular water content than older tissues. This leads to much deeper penetration of effects.
For these reasons, Wi-Fi and cell-phones tower radiation in schools are both of special concern
Slide7;
Five of these effects appear to be cumulative and as they become more severe, as irreversible. The cumulative effects mean that repeated exposure to the same intensity and type of EMF produce more and more severe effects. The five are;
1. Reproduction effects.
2. Neurological/neuropsychiatric effects
3. Germ line mutation effects caused by DNA effects.
4. Cardiac effects
5. Alzheimer and other dementias.

A sixth may be autism, when exposures are primarily during the late prenatal and early post-natal Period.
I am most concerned about the first three, because they each produce clear existential threats to the survival of each technologically advanced country (TAC) on earth.
The reproductive effects are most clearly advanced, with sperm counts having dropped by over 50% in each TAC and reproduction dropped well below replacement levels in each TAC with a single exception. In mice, EMFs led to a drop of reproduction to zero. A reasonable estimate is that it may take something like 5 years for TACs to suffer such a catastrophic drop in human reproduction.
Side8;
5G will entail using much higher frequencies and pulsations than our current microwave devices. The much higher pulsations allow 5G to carry more information. Frequency and pulsation predict that 5G will be much more active in activating the VGCCs (Voltage-gated Calcium Channels). Because the 5G millimeter wave radiation is much more absorbed by building and other materials, 5G will entail tens of millions of antennae, widely distributed making it essentially impossible to avoid high level exposures. Each of these properties predict that 5G will be vastly more dangerous than are our already existing exposure.
The industry claims that 5G will largely absorbed in the outer 1mm of the body and therefore we don’t need to worry about it. However, EMFs act hundreds of times more deeply than industry claims. I can discuss how this happens it there are questions later
The current plan, which has already been approved by the US Congress and FCC is to put out tens of millions of 5G antennae, irradiating every single person and other organism in the whole country without even a single biological safety test of genuine 5G radiation
The 5G Rollout is Absolutely Insane


3. Evaluation of Mobile Phone and Cordless Phone Use and Glioma Risk Using the Bradford Hill Viewpoints from 1965 on Association or Causation Michael Carlberg and Lennart Hardell
Bradford Hill’s viewpoints from 1965 on association or causation were used on glioma risk and use of mobile or cordless phones.
Conclusion; RF radiation should be regarded as a human carcinogen causing glioma
Figure 1: Restricted cubic spline plot of the relationship between latency of ipsilateral mobile phone use and glioma. The Odds ratio doubles in 24 years 1.5 : 3.0 within 95% ConfidenceL.
Fig 6: Number of outgoing mobile phone minutes in millions during 1999–2013 and joinpoint regression analysis of age standardized death rates per 100,000 inhabitants according to the Swedish Causes of Death Register for all ages during 1999–2013 diagnosed with D43 = tumour of unknown type in the brain or CNS. Latency 4years?

Table 6: Specificity. Estimated elevation in brain tumour risk (𝛼) and 95% confidence interval (CI) in shortest distance group 0–55mm compared to reference category ≥ 115.01mm from preferred ear to tumour center. Based on Grell et al. [44]. Covariate 𝛼 95% CI
Tumour size
≤18 cm3 1.96 1.51–3.66
>18 cm3 4.09 1.90–12.0
Duration of phone use
<6 years 2.02 1.31–4.28
≥6 years 3.27 1.92–11.3
Cumulative phone use
<200 hours 1.57 1.29–3.36
≥200 hours 4.06 2.03–11.6
Cumulative number of calls
<4,000 1.55 1.25–3.42
≥4,000 3.56 2.05–9.88

http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2017/9218486.pdf

Brain Tumours: Rise in Glioblastoma Multiforme Incidence in England 1995–2015 Suggests an Adverse Environmental or Lifestyle Factor. Alasdair Philips

Figure 5: Frontal and temporal lobe GBM age–standardised incidence rates by tumour site and year (data table in the SI as [S6]).
http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jeph/2018/7910754.pdf


4. Using the Hill viewpoints from 1965 for evaluating strengths of evidence of the risk for brain tumors associated with use of mobile and cordless phones.
Conclusion: Based on the Hill criteria, glioma and acoustic neuroma should be considered to be caused by RF-EMF emissions from wireless phones and regarded as carcinogenic to humans, classifying it as group 1 according to the IARC classification. Current guidelines for exposure need to be urgently revised.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24192496/
The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? by Sir Austin Bradford Hill.
1.Strength, 2.Consistency, 3.Specificity, 4.Temporality, 5.Biological gradient, 6.Plausibility, 7.Coherence, 8.Experiment, 9.Analog. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1898525/pdf/procrsmed00196-0010.pdf

5. Correlation between Mobile Phone Ownership and the Top 184 increased Cancer registrations.
Largest Increased 184 types of Cancer registrations correlate to dashed blue line of mobile phone ownership.
The issue is how to prove the correlation is causation.
The Bradford Hill 9 viewpoints has already been used to prove excessive mobile phone use causes Glioblastoma Multiform C71.1 C71.2 Brain tumours with Oncologists Hardell and Carlberg research submission to the WHO. There is well over 30,000 EMF Health impact studies (listed in my itemised attached) that are being ignored by Government and BigTech for profit.

The issue is how to prove the correlation is causation.
The Bradford Hill 9 viewpoints has already been used to prove excessive mobile phone use causes Glioblastoma Multiform C71.1 C71.2 Brain tumours with Oncologists Hardell and Carlberg research submission to the WHO. I have all the significant research studies.
However, there is well over 30,000 EMF Health impact studies (listed in my Health Evidemce itemised attached) that are being ignored by Government and BigTech for profit.
Why the 8 fold rise in some forms of Cancer registrations in 20 years?
 
6. Multiple other cities and Countries have called a halt to 5G using the UNESCO Precautionary Principle.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000139578
International Actions to Halt and Delay 5G.
https://ehtrust.org/international-actions-to-halt-and-delay-5g/
EHT 5G &Cel Tower Protest Worldwide

7. There are issues of child skull irradiation from Mobile Phones.
The truth about mobile phone and wireless radiation

8. The INTERNATIONAL APPEAL Stop 5G on Earth and in Space.
There are 302,720 signatories from 216 nations and territories as of Nov 3rd, 2022 To the UN, WHO, EU, Council of Europe and governments of all nations.
We the undersigned scientists, doctors, environmental organizations and citizens from (__) countries, urgently call for a halt to the deployment of the 5G (fifth generation) wireless network, including 5G from space satellites. 5G will massively increase exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation on top of the 2G, 3G and 4G networks for telecommunications already in place. RF radiation has been proven harmful for humans and the environment. The deployment of 5G constitutes an experiment on humanity and the environment that is defined as a crime under international law. The 5G space appeal
https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal
9. Scientists warn of potential serious health effects of 5G and lists the Precautionary principle, Resolution 1815 of the Council of Europe; require all reasonable measures to reduce exposure., and Nuremberg code 1949 that no experiments where prior knowledge of deaths will occur.
5G is at least a tenfold increase in exposure with multiple booster arrays in every street much higher frequency than 3,4G, pulsed focused beams and on most street lampposts and poles as all pervasive with no consent from those that have to be exposed.
The 5G Appeal; “We the undersigned, scientists and doctors, recommend a moratorium on the roll-out of the fifth generation, 5G, for telecommunication until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry. 5G will substantially increase exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on top of the 2G, 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, etc. for telecommunications already in place. RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.”  there are 424 signatories.
http://www.5gappeal.eu/the-5g-appeal/
The 5G Appeal was prepared in 2017 by scientists and doctors who are urgently calling for the EU to halt the roll out of 5G due to serious potential health effects from this new technology. 5G will substantially increase exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on top of the 2G, 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, etc. for telecommunications already in place. RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.  
As of November 3, 2022, 302,720 people and organizations from 216 nations and territories have signed this Appeal, including 4,471 Medical Doctors.
The 5G Appeal is still open for endorsement for scientists (PhD, professor) or medical doctors (MD. Please contact professor em. Rainer Nyberg or assoc.. professor Lennart Hardell.
The appeal was initially submitted in September 2017 to the European Commission.
https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/medical-doctors
https://www.5gappeal.eu/about/
10. Environmental Health Trust evidence of “serious health risk to humans, animals and the environment” from 2,3,4G;
Published Scientific Research on 5G, Small Cells Wireless and Health;
Published peer reviewed science already indicates that the current wireless technologies of 2G, 3G and 4G – in use today with our cell phones, computers and wearable tech – creates (create) radiofrequency exposures which poses (pose) a serious health risk to humans, animals and the environment. Scientists are cautioning that before rolling out 5G, research on human health effects urgently needs to be done first to ensure the public and environment are protected.”
https://ehtrust.org/scientific-research-on-5g-and-health/?fbclid=IwAR06Ha7xf5XJoFVCRbjvuERO25S0DUOQEj8mHw2IZ0mjQ9sYJCWjL1E9IZ8
11. ICNIRP self-certification is invalid as there is no actual Authority certification.
Those ICNIRP EMF exposure guidelines have no certified validity.
Trafford LA Planning Committee refused two 5G Masts at Urmston, and another at Timperley as having failed to demonstrate that the proposal would conform to the ICNIRP EMF Exposure Guidelines
NPPF117; b) for an addition to an existing mast or base station, a statement that self-certifies that the cumulative exposure, when operational, will not exceed International Commission guidelines on non-ionising radiation protection; or
c) for a new mast or base station, evidence that the applicant has explored the possibility of erecting antennas on an existing building, mast or other structure and a statement that self-certifies that, when operational, International Commission guidelines will be met.

The issue with self-certification is that ICNRP “disowns” any responsibility or liability for their own guidelines, as only their guidance, yet inappropriately that “disowned lack of liability” guidance as an imposed Exposure Guideline used in MHCLG NPPF 118. Who also do not accept any liability for EMF health damage.
Legal Terms Impressum
“ICNIRP e.V. undertakes all reasonable measures to ensure the reliability of information presented on the website, but does not guarantee the correctness, reliability, or completeness of the information and views published. The content of our website is provided to you for information only. We do not assume any responsibility for any damage, including direct or indirect loss suffered by users or third parties in connection with the use of our website and/or the information it contains, including for the use or the interpretation of any technical data, recommendations, or specifications available on our website.
https://www.icnirp.org/en/legal-notice.html

An ICNIRP “disowned liability” guidance which MHCLG in NPP114-118 insist those ICNRP Exposure guidelines are used., and with no recourse to object on Health issues and no one actually taking responsibity or liability for those ICNRP imposed Guidelines if it causes health damage.
There is no Official authority that has validated that self-certification with those ICNRIP guidelines.
ICNIRP Guidelines without official certification and no one to accept liability for them is invalid.
 
Not least also legally proven in the US courts Devra Davis-Childrens Defence League v FDA. my Evidence submission attached.
What assurances are there to the Planning Committee of liability if and when people are health impacted by EMF over exposure.
Recent planning refusals based on invalid self-certification  include Urmiston, Timperley, Trafford as “failed to be in compliance with ICNRP Guidelines.
That failure to apply ICNIRP Guidelines also includes the Fishersgate Adjudication that Health issues override NPPF114-118 use of ICNRIP unreliable guidelines.
 
Council believes a 5G mast in Timperley did not comply with ICNIRP guidelines
The application fails to demonstrate that the proposal would be in compliance with the International Commission on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Public Exposure Guidelines. As such, the proposal would fail to comply with the provisions of paragraph 117 of the National Planning Policy Framework.”
“5G or even a 4G mast should be around 500m away from a residential area, we can inform you that many masts are well within this figure, for example and at a rough estimate:
https://news4trafford.co.uk/2022/07/13/council-believes-a-5g-mast-in-timperley-did-not-comply-with-icnirp-guidelines/comment-page-1/
How to Legally Oppose Planning for 4G & 5G Mobile Phone Masts or Cell Towers
NPPF issues
NPPF113; “Consumer requirement if no demand”, ”should be kept to a minimum” and toise existing masts”, “ sympathetically designed as camouflaged”, “ugly”
NPPF114; 2a; Article 4 ban. Minimum distance required” 2b; EMF interference to the Human body.
NPPF115; has full open and transparent consultation taken place
https://smombiegate.org/how-to-legally-oppose-planning-for-4g-5g-mobile-phone-masts-or-cell-towers/
12. There are multiple Lancet, US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health, and Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory ORSAA as thousands of research papers that have been ignored that evidence significant health issues with 5G.
Lancet; Planetary electromagnetic pollution: it is time to assess its impact.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(18)30221-3/fulltext
Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(11)70147-4/fulltext
Multiple Research evidence.
https://www.orsaa.org/orsaa-database.html
https://www.orsaa.org/orsaa-research-papers—part-1.html
https://www.orsaa.org/orsaa-research-papers—part-2.html
National Library of Medicine Research Studies.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=5g+radiation
13. Unexplained 44% large rise in Cancer registrations in any 20 year period 1971-2017-my ONS MB1 charts, and 160% increase in Dementia Deaths 2010-2018.
A doubling of C71.1, C71.2 frontal and temporal Lobe cancer registrations that have moved the correlation candidate of Mobile Phones to causal status.
The Turin Court of Appeal 904/2019 3/12/2019 fully confirms the 2017 Court of Ivrea judgement judge Fadda: it is true that the acoustic neurinoma was caused by the working use of the mobile phone.
https://www.radiationresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Turin-Verdict-ICNIRP_Judgment-SUMMARY-of-the-Turin-Court-of-Appeal-9042019_EN-min.pdf

14. Dr Sarah Starkey has defined the over reliance on ICNIRP by the UK Government, PHE, WHO and AGNIR for world exposure limits for EMF radiation, however PHE ignores all but ICNIRP to set limits for exposure levels.
Official Advice on the safety of radiofrequency radiation, risk assessment and adverse effects.
https://cdn.website-editor.net/2479f24c54de4c7598d60987e3d81157/files/uploaded/S._Starkey_Presentation_5th_November_2018.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2YAVTUYk7dbgMXkqXrOKadO_1gxZXJB5nFhXIx3rb0qdOBChuY307bRHM 
ICNIRP Guidelines were 10W/mtr² then doubled to 20W/mtr² while independent studies as one million times less at 30µW/mtr² or 30 microW/mtrs²
15. A Dr Sarah Starkey report that lists a conflict of interests with member of AGNIR, ICNIRP, and disputes scientific accuracy, studies omitted, with evidence dismissed and ignored, aswell as Incorrect statement, while PHE entirely reliant on those bodies to validate the use of 5G.
“The Advisory Group on Non-ionising Radiation (AGNIR) 2012 report forms the basis of official advice on the safety of radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields in the United Kingdom and has been relied upon by health protection agencies around the world. This review describes incorrect and misleading statements from within the report, omissions and conflict of interest, which make it unsuitable for health risk assessment.”
Inaccurate official assessment of radiofrequency safety by the Advisory Group on Non-ionising Radiation
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/reveh-2016-0060/html
There is similar suppression and using biased selective research papers and other that are omitted studies by SCENHIR
Radiation Research; “The SCENIHR Report fails to do a thorough review of hundreds of papers on non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) and biological health effects, and excludes literally hundreds of papers containing new information in the field concerning adverse EMR impacts.”
https://www.emfacts.com/2014/05/breaking-news-industry-bias-exposed-in-scenihrs-scientific-assessment/?fbclid=IwAR1Xz5PYwmg7ltOHDfsSp0ATe0gouKwsVwE_1VqKBx5R2IY4uVG4SYN6le4
There is similar reported ICNIRP issues and conflict of interest from the members of the European Parliament Buchner and Rivasi report;
The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection: Conflicts of interest, corporate interests and the push for 5G Scharen Brussels June 2020. 5G Klaus Buchner and Michèle Rivasi at EU Parliament.
https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/ICNIRP-report-FINAL-JUNE-2020.pdf
16. There is a multitude of international scientists and institutes that disagree with ICNIRP exposure limits 10W/mtr² 1998 exacerbated to 20W/ mtr² 2020.

Alternative Guidelines have been ignored.
BioInitiative update 2022 suggests safe limits are 3µW/mtr² for children, and 30µW/mtr² for adults.
Pdf1503; Thomas et al (2008) reported an increase in adult complaints of headaches and concentration difficulties with short-term cell phone use at 0.005 to 0.04 μW/cm2 exposure levels. (50µW/mtr² )
Heinrich et al (2010) reported that children and adolescents (8-17 years old) with short-term exposure to base-station level RFR experienced headache, irritation, and concentration difficulties in school. RFR levels were 0.003 – 0.02 μW/cm2. (30µW/mtr² )
Thomas et al (2010) reported that RFR levels of 0.003 – 0.02 μW/cm2 resulted in conduct and behavioral problems in children and adolescents (8-17 years old) exposed to short-term cell phone radiation in school.
Pdf70,80,1504; F. Evidence for Effects from Cell Tower-Level RFR Exposures At least five new cell tower studies with base-station level RFR at levels ranging from 0.003μW/cm2 to 0.05 uW/cm2 published since 2007 report headaches, concentration difficulties and behavioral problems in children and adolescents; and sleep disturbances, headaches and concentration problems in adults.
This is highly consistent with studies done prior to 2007, but the ‘effect levels’ are significantly lower (dropping from the microwatt to the nanowatt range per square centimeter).
Pdf77,93,1520; A scientific benchmark of 0.003 uW/cm2  or three nanowatts per centimeter squared for ‘lowest observed effect level’ for RFR is based on mobile phone base station-level studies. Applying a ten-fold reduction to compensate for the lack of long-term exposure (to provide a safety buffer for chronic exposure, if needed) or for children as a sensitive subpopulation (if studies are on adults, not children) yields a 300 to 600 picowatts per square centimeter precautionary action level
https://bioinitiative.org/table-of-contents/
Download the report with multiple research papers updates to 2022
https://bioinitiative.org/table-of-contents/#
https://bioinitiative.org/updated-research-summaries/
Unit conversion; 0.003μW/cm2 = 30µW/mtr2   0.001μW/cm2 = 10µW/mtr2
The Institute of Building Biology and Sustainability IBN also suggests 10µW/mtr², aswell as the BioInitiative with both as a million times less than ICNIRP Exposure Guidelines
 
https://buildingbiology.com/site/downloads/richtwerte-2015-englisch.pdf

17. There has been no Environmental Impact Health and Safety Assessment and an override of all “normal” planning procedures to force 5G through as imposed without due diligence.
That causes an indemnity and liability for all those that imposed the technology without the required Duty of care for the Public
There has been no Environment Safety or Health Impact Assessment EIA conducted anywhere.
The UK Government needs to halt the 5G rollout until there is an unbiased independent assessment.
Where is the Environment Impact Assessment EIA in any 5G mast planning proposals?
Where is the Power Density assessment for the 5G mast?
Where is the Local Authority EIA documented evaluation that the proposal meets with safe Exposure Guidelines to not cause health damage?
The evidence confirms that ICNIRP EMF Guidelines are; a. outdated, b. not fit for purpose, c. does not consider non-ionising irradiation health impact, d. does not consider MIMO unmeasured pulsed focused beaming increased power densities, e. multiple research studies that prove ICNIRP relies on assumption not science, f. not only a self-selecting group, and collective “groupthink”, but also of known “conflict of interests in the telecoms industry as employed by them,.
Wireless Industry Confesses: “No Studies Show 5G is Safe”
Multiple links to Scientific evidence ignored in Items 32,33.
https://www.takebackyourpower.net/senate-hearing-wireless-industry-confesses-no-studies-showing-5g-safety/?fbclid=IwAR1w-mkJ4V5AZIjDK6MVeA4V5MJcPqteyynMtfPYj1jH0ToANT08tubdKL0

The UK Government needs to halt the 5G rollout until there is an unbiased EIA independent assessment and fit for purpose EMF Guidelines.
18. Lloyds Insurers Refuse To Cover 5G Wi-Fi Illnesses
https://principia-scientific.org/lloyds-insurers-refuse-to-cover-5g-wi-fi-illnesses/
Lloyds underwriters CFC Underwriting Limited
http://emrabc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/InsuranceAEWordingCanadav17Feb2015.pdf
GENERAL INSURANCE EXCLUSIONS
Para32. Electromagnetic fields directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from or contributed to by electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic radiation, electromagnetism, radio waves or noise.
https://nowhere.news/index.php/2018/10/27/lloyds-refuses-liability-coverage-for-emf-radiation-exposure-mobile-phones/
http://themillenniumreport.com/2019/04/why-is-lloyds-of-london-excluding-coverage-for-5g/
Verizon warn shareholders of personal injury litigation through EMG radiation
https://ehtrust.org/key-issues/cell-phoneswireless/telecom-insurance-companies-warn-liability-risk-go-key-issues/
19. Further evidenced Scientific research;
https://www.5gfrequencyfreefairbanks.org/?fbclid=IwAR1UHeq2axhlpNsYBLtW66xYPugJ7P2wNMiu06jZG4393WwRrr-oYP5Rl9I

EMF pathway.
Letter to the FCC from Dr. Yael Stein MD of the Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel in Opposition to 5G Spectrum Frontiers Millimeter Wave Technology
Human sweat glands as helical antennas:
https://ehtrust.org/letter-fcc-dr-yael-stein-md-opposition-5g-spectrum-frontiers/
Telecompowergrab.
There are more than 1,000 scientific studies conducted by independent researchers from around the world concerning the biological effects of RF radiation. Here we present some of the most recent.
https://www.telecompowergrab.org/science.html
5th Generation (5G) Wireless Communications Fact Sheet
• mmWaves have unique health impacts on the human body. Sweat ducts within our skin, the largest organ in the human body, act as antennae when in contact with mm Waves. The waves penetrate 1 to 2 millimeters of human skin tissue and are also absorbed by the surface layers of the eye’s cornea https://www.telecompowergrab.org/uploads/3/8/5/9/38599771/5g_fact_sheet_v9.pdf
https://www.telecompowergrab.org/
Human sweat glands as helical antennas at 45Ghz-845Ghz:
https://ehtrust.org/letter-fcc-dr-yael-stein-md-opposition-5g-spectrum-frontiers/

20. Resident Observed EMF radiation from a Monopole at 300mtrs 17,0000µW/mtr²
5G Magz Explores Areas In Dundee Taking EMF Readings
Video; Trifield meter test at 17.789milliW/mtr² or 17789 µW/mtr² at 100 mtrs from Cell Towers.


EMF meter is only useful if known Health damage from multi-Scientific research evidence for the EMF Power Density
BioInitiative Pdf page 94-104 https://bioinitiative.org/table-of-contents/#
A comparison of peer group reviewed EMF research papers to experienced 5G Monopole Meter at maximum level of 17.789mW/mtr² or 17.789milliW/mtr² or 17789 µW/mtr²
The BioInitiative research studies suggests safety guidelines no more than;
30 µW/mtr²    BioInititaive Guidelines
3 µW/mtr²      BioInititaive Guidelines as a 10 fold reduction for children Pdf77
Example; Yet this meter at 17789 µW/mtr² as 600 times more.
6000 times more for children 3 µW/mtr²
Anecdotal comparison between readings and BioInitiative Research paper health damage

All Power densities listed Item31,and health damage research studies Item32 apply for the Trifield meter reading at 16.971mW/mtr² or 17,000 µW/mtr² at 100 mtrs from Cell Towers.
EMF meter is only useful if known Health damage f

ThinkAgain
ThinkAgain
Reply to  John Blundell
7 months ago

This is the longest comment ever, maybe The Expose could reformat and publish as a separate article,

trackback
7 months ago

[…]  PATRICIE HARRITY 10. ZÁŘÍ 2023 […]

UltraZero
UltraZero
7 months ago

Eco-Totalitarianism has arrived

“…someone from your power supplier will have the right to enter your home to replace your current meter with a smart meter. If you refuse him entry or try to refuse having a smart meter installed, he can legally return with police back-up, force entry into your home and use what is called “reasonable force” to restrain you while he rips out your old-fashioned meter and replaces it with a smart meter.”

Insanity. Our meters are not inside the home. Don’t let utility personal inside your home. I know for a fact that some are lookouts for others who will enter later and rip you off when you leave.

https://dailysceptic.org/2023/09/11/the-coming-eco-totalitarianism/

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Expose-news pranešimus: Valstybė planuoja priversti reikalavimų neatitinkančius gyventojus įsirengti išmaniuosius skaitiklius arba sumokėti 15 000 svarų sterlingų baudą. „Tradicinių dujų ir elektros skaitiklių pakeitimas išmaniaisiais skaitikliais yra esminis Didžiosios Britanijos nacionalinės infrastruktūros atnaujinimas”, – mums teigia vyriausybė, kuri skatina naudoti išmanųjį skaitiklį kaip pinigų taupymo priemonę. (šaltinis). […]

Frank S.
Frank S.
7 months ago

I plugged in one of those StopWatt devices in January 2023. Since then, I’ve reduced my electric bill by 25%, without lowering my usual use.

trackback
5 months ago

[…] them there are world-wide reports of EMR injuries and that there is no valid safety data proving […]