|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
With the world’s attention on South Africa’s case at the United Nations’ International Court of Justice it’s legitimate to ask: If South Africa is concerned about genocide in the Middle East, why is it not concerned about genocide, murders and deaths in its own and neighbouring countries?
Below we highlight the plight of South Africans and Zimbabweans which, while raising a case of genocide in Palestine, the South African government is ignoring or, worse still, aiding and abetting. These are in addition to covid crimes against humanity perpetrated by the South African government on its own people.
Although you may feel like praising the South African government, spare a thought for its many victims.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Thousands are Dying in Zimbabwe
“Whilst the African continent and decent people across the world are celebrating the court ruling in the case brought by South Africa against Israel, the same decent people must ask themselves why it is not important for the same South African government to stop the silent deaths of thousands of Zimbabweans dying due to the Zimbabwean political crisis which it openly supports and defends both privately and publicly.” – Hopewell Chin’ono
Hopewell Chin’ono is a Zimbabwean award-winning documentary filmmaker and international journalist who has been persecuted by the state for speaking out against state corruption and tyranny. The following is a copy of a tweet he posted on 27 January 2024.
I would like to congratulate the South African government and the brilliant legal team that argued the case against the brutal killing of defenceless Palestinians.
Leadership requires to take unpopular yet correct decisions to protect the defenceless. Taking on Israel is not an easy task in a world where such a decision carries severe economic consequences.
It must be made clear that what was on trial is Israel and NOT the Jewish people.
This decision was important to save innocent lives, that is why it surprises many that the same South African government ignores the loss of life due to violent corrupt rule in Zimbabwe, literally its own backyard.
2,500 Zimbabwean pregnant women die every year giving birth in Zimbabwe because of the political crisis authored by ZANU-PF’s corrupt rule. That is the equivalent of 15 jumbo jets crashing every year and killing everyone on board.
Yet South Africa’s ruling party publicly declares support for ZANU-PF. Not only that, the economic burden falls on South Africa for those who survive because 75% of women giving birth at South Africa’s Musina Hospital in Limpopo are Zimbabwean.
If South Africa applied the same moral compass that it correctly used on the genocide in the Gaza Strip in Palestine, these women wouldn’t be dying and the South African taxpayer wouldn’t be carrying the financial burden.
Is the dying of 2,500 pregnant Zimbabwean women every year not a human rights issue worth pursuing for the South African government?
Is the burden of the Zim political crisis on South Africa’s maternity theatres not an urgent issue worth addressing for the SA government?
Thousands of Zimbabweans die every year from treatable cancer because Zim doesn’t have a single working radiotherapy cancer treatment machine, something that costs only US$1 million to buy.
Those who can cross the Limpopo River end up getting cancer treatment in South Africa.
This is not only a humanitarian disaster, it is also a silent genocide, not only that, but it also burdens the South African taxpayer because South African hospitals have to treat Zimbabweans who seek cancer treatment.
All this is caused by policies authored by the ANC’s kindred soulmate, ZANU-PF.
One would ask, are lives elsewhere more important for the South African government than next door in Zimbabwe?
Every life matters!
Does the South African government only respond when people are killed by bombs and guns and not by failed policies that end up with the biggest hospital in Zimbabwe having only ONE maternity theatre built in 1977 by Ian Smith’s government?
It costs only US$37,000 or R703,000 to build a maternity theatre, ONE Landcruiser can build 11 maternity theatres in Zimbabwe, yet the Zimbabwean government has thousands of these cars in service.
What amazes those of us who deal with the daily pain of losing relatives in Zimbabwe is that the South African government through its President and the ANC is an active defender of the Zimbabwean regime and its disastrous policies.
Is the life of the black African in Zimbabwe less important to the ANC and the South African government than elsewhere?
Jamaicans have a proverb that says: “Yuh fi dance a yard before yuh dance abroad,” loosely translated it says dance at home before you go to dance abroad.
The proverb emphasises the importance of addressing local issues or challenges before venturing into broader or international matters. It suggests a focus on addressing internal concerns before engaging with external affairs.
The Zimbabwean government has created an illegal immigration crisis in South Africa such that single-issue political parties have been formed in South Africa and are winning seats in elections. Put differently, Zimbabwe is no longer just a foreign policy issue for South Africa, it is now a domestic issue.
Please do for Zimbabweans what you correctly did for the Palestinians.
Dance a yard before yuh dance abroad, consistent application of moral principles is an important attribute.
South African Farm Attacks and Murders
Is a crime against humanity at risk of unfolding in South Africa? Elon Musk, the Pretoria-born billionaire who owns X (Twitter) and Tesla, fears that there might be. Last year, he wrote that he’d heard of calls for “a genocide of white people” in his former homeland.
Musk isn’t alone in his concerns. Steve Hofmeyr, a South African singer with a cult following, thinks that the “g-word” is an appropriate way to describe what is unfolding: “If you think that the slaughter of South African farmers is not genocide enough, ask them about their land, language, religion, education, universities, heritage, monuments, safety, dignity and the race-based regulations imposed upon them and their children.”
Donald Trump voiced a similar concern when he was in the White House. In a tweet that caused a diplomatic bust-up between South Africa and the United States in 2018, Trump referred to the “large-scale killing of farmers.” The government in Pretoria labelled his claim ridiculous, but was Trump right about what is unfolding?
Logging as many as 450 murders in a week, South Africa has the third-highest murder rate in the world, well ahead of Colombia and Mexico.
The Democratic Alliance (“DA”) is the official opposition with the second-most seats in parliament after the ruling African National Congress (“ANC”). DA shadow minister for Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development, Phineas Masipa, agrees with Genocide Watch’s Dr. Gregory Stanton that “for all the tragedy of farm murders in South Africa, there is no evidence of a planned extermination.”
However, Masipa says there needs to be an investigation into all rural deaths, including farmers and the black workers and security guards often attacked by the same gangs.
“No matter how we label this, a perception that farmers and their staff are not safe could deter the next generation of growers,” Mapisa said. “This raises a concern around food security on a continent vulnerable to hunger.”
Staunton said it was a situation the United Nations and human rights groups should be watching closely. But, all too often, the response of such organisations is simply silence. Meanwhile, there’s no sign that the rate at which South Africans are being murdered – some white, but overwhelmingly black – will slow anytime soon.
Read more: What’s the truth about South Africa’s ‘genocide’ of white farmers? The Spectator, 29 December 2023
The South African farm murders (Afrikaans: plaasmoorde) are violent crimes, including murder, torture, rape, assault and robbery, that take place on farms in South Africa. The attacks target both white and black farmers. They are not a recent development. In 2010, Andre Botha of the agricultural union Agri SA stated that there have been 11,785 attacks and 1,804 murders since 1991 – a rate of two farm murders a week.
Many farm owners believe that the attacks are racially motivated and intended to drive white farmers out of commercial farmlands.
According to Wikipedia, the South African government set a target of transferring 30% of productive farmland to “previously disadvantaged” black people by 2014. The land reform was criticised both by farmers’ groups and by landless workers, the latter alleging that the pace of change has not been fast enough, and the former alleging racist treatment and expressing concerns that a similar disastrous situation to Zimbabwe’s land grab policy may develop.
Related: Farmer Bill and his wife, the private owners of more farmland than anyone else in America
In 2014, in the latest twist on the scramble for land in Africa which had seen foreign countries buying up huge areas of land in the hope of securing food supplies, the Republic of Congo planned to give away vast tracts of land to South African farmers in the hope they will be able to grow enough food to feed the country.
The Telegraph explained that South African farmers were considering this and other such deals because they felt under pressure from the ANC that their land was going to be taken and redistributed, adding:
Pretoria has so far operated a ‘willing buyer, willing seller’ approach and is adamant there will be no repetition of the chaos in Zimbabwe, but [Theo de Jager, deputy president of Agri-SA] said negotiations are under way with 16 other African countries to secure similar deals [to the Republic of Congo].
Congo hands land to South African farmers, The Telegraph, 21 October 2009
The Government of South Africa and other analysts maintain that farm attacks are part of a broader crime problem in South Africa and do not have a racial motivation; the Afrikaans non-governmental organisation Afriforum, as well as the political party Freedom Front Plus (FF+), have disputed this.
The South African Police Service (“SAPS”) stopped releasing homicide statistics on farm murders in 2007 instead merging them with all homicide figures, this has increased the difficulty of accessing reliable statistics with most studies since relying on data from the Transvaal Agricultural Union of South Africa (“TAUSA” or “TAU”) instead.
According to TAU, the 2009/2019 decade saw an increase of 86% in farm and rural attacks and murders compared to 1990/1999.
In 2017, South African farmers constituted statistically the most vulnerable population group in the world. They were three times more likely to be killed than a policeman in a country that has one of the highest murder rates in the world.
In 2018, Queensland senator Fraser Anning described the attacks on South African farmers as “the start of a genocide” and that it was state-supported genocide.
“This is the start of a genocide as far as I’m concerned, and it’s only going to get worse because the genocide has just started,” he said.
“Anyone who would boil a child in a bath, rape his mother and slaughter people the way they are slaughtering them now are subhuman.”
The Mail & Guardian reported that South Africa has a low rate of arrests and convictions in farm attack and murder cases despite a national police policy to fight crime in rural areas.
According to a report by AfriForum, which analysed 1,402 farm attacks and murder incidents recorded by the South African Police Service (“SAPS”) from 2019 to 2022, there were convictions in just 66 cases, which means that more than 95% of these violent crimes remain unsolved.
“The results indicate that the arrest and conviction rate for both farm murders and attacks are low. The low arrest rate for attacks (22%) and murders (49%) is of particular concern,” the report found.
In December 2020, the European Parliament passed a resolution urging the member states to openly admit that these brutal attacks are racially driven and to support the plight of people of European descent who have lived in South Africa for generations, and in particular that of South African farmers.
The resolution also urged EU member states to put pressure on the South African government to prioritise tackling these crimes and to prosecute those who directly or indirectly call for the murder of farmers and white South Africans.
In August 2023, the DA published an article demanding an investigation into farm murders. “The DA is deeply concerned about the sharp rise in farm murders in South Africa and the dangerous rhetoric inciting violence against a particular group in society. The ANC’s failure to address the inflammatory statements and farm attacks shows a lack of leadership in protecting citizens,” the DA wrote.
“The DA urgently calls for the establishment of a commission of inquiry to investigate the link between incitement and farm attacks and demands decisive leadership from President Cyril Ramaphosa to address the crisis.”
In another article published the same month, the DA said South Africa’s President Cyril Ramaphosa was ignoring their formal request to establish a Commission of Inquiry into farm attacks and murders.
Since submission of the request, 16 farm murders have been registered between May and July 2023, representing a 56% increase.
With rising unemployment and many South Africans going to bed hungry, the Presidency should be very concerned about this critical sector and doing everything in his power to protect the farmers and farm workers.
68 days and counting – Ramaphosa still refuses to take action on farm murders, DA, 15 August 2023
The following month, the continuing attacks – and murders – of farmers and their workers came under the spotlight in the South African National Assembly. Masipa told the house her party “had already” approached South African President Cyril Ramaphosa “urging” him to set up a commission of inquiry into farm murders and related crimes.”
Masipa expressed hope the ad hoc committee would be the predecessor to a fully-fledged commission of inquiry that “will chart the way forward for safer farming communities.”
Another DA public representative, Brandon Golding, who sits on the Police Portfolio Committee as an additional member, also raised the food security issue calling the “ongoing scourge of farm attacks a blight on the [South African] nation.”
Read more: South Africa farm attacks on Defence Web and South Africa farm murders on The South African
In the video below, Real History with Melissa explores the question: Are the farm murders in South Africa a globalists’ ploy to get rid of farmers?
Melissa and South African commentor Darin cover South Africa’s high unemployment, farm murders, ANC corruption, power outages, water shortages, water treatment and cholera, the train system nearly destroyed, the World Economic Forum and more. There is a comprehensive list of resources noted in the description below the video on BitChute and on Rumble.
A timestamp 12:18, the discussion turns to crime in South Africa, beginning with the farm murders.
“[South Africa is] the murder and rape capital of the world,” Darin said. “And we’ve got the most unbelievable corruption in government.”
The last statistic that Melissa had seen was 20,000 murders per year. “Which is incredibly high,” she said.
The United Nations World Population Review lists 21,036 murders occurring in South Africa during 2017. In its ‘2023 Global Study on Homicide’ report, the United Nations noted: “The homicide rate in Africa has remained relatively stable over the past decade, although there was a marked uptick in killings recorded in 2021 … which can be partly attributed to sharp increases in the number of intentional homicides in Kenya and South Africa from the end of 2020 to the end of 2021 … In 2021, the number of victims of homicide in South Africa reached a total of almost 25,000, or roughly 5,000 more than in 2020.”
There are two types of farm attacks, Darin explained. There are attacks that result from general crime and then, “farmers are special targets,” he said. “The ruling party, the ANC government, is purposefully underplaying and denying [farm murders].”
“The other aspect of farm murders that is far more sinister,” he said. “You can see there’s a definite purpose behind these farm murders that goes beyond just crime. And on one level it makes the ANC look bad, it’s a big stain on the country that the nature of these attacks is so sickening, so disgusting – there’s a deep deep racist hatred of the victim – tortured to death, disfigured.”
CCTV footage has captured people dressed in military-like fatigues who are very well equipped, Darin said. “[With] some of these farm attacks you can see these people carrying sophisticated cell phone blocking technology. It’s a special pack which I think can only be acquired militarily, or stolen. They will go at night and they have this equipment where the farmer cannot communicate [with the outside world]. That equipment is very expensive and is something that shows a very very high degree of planning – and that’s not ‘just crime’ … that is assassination,” he said.
What Darin has said is confirmed in a 2005 paper published in the journal Acta Criminologica which stated: “Characteristics of these attacks are analysed and include calculated military precision, the presence of strangers in the area, attacks on both white and black farmers, and gang activity to name a few.”
“There is definitely some kind of hit squad scenario happening on farms and no one quite knows who is organising it [or] who is funding it but the evidence is there that [shows] the farming community is being targeted by higher powers. It’s not all basic crime; although there are farm attacks and attacks on small holdings that are local crime but not on [this] organised level of trying to get farmers off their property,” Darin said.
“The government plays it down. They try to play off all [farm attacks] as ‘just [local] crime’.”
The South African farm attacks and murders are highly politicised which is why South Africans are struggling to get the international exposure their stories need to put pressure on the South African government to investigate and hold those responsible to account. This is why the South African farmers and farm workers are denied the right to security of person.
Politicisation of justice is also a problem with the International Court of Justice (“ICJ”), which is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations (“UN”).
In an article published before the ICJ heard South Africa’s case against Israel, International Informants noted that the ICJ is political. “The ICJ consists of 15 judges representing 15 different of 15 different nationalities, and their given country’s policies and politics have the potential to influence their ruling,” International Informants wrote.
The article went on to predict how each judge would decide, before the hearing began, based on politics and concluded: “They do not officially represent their nation and are required to be uninfluenced by politics and policies. However, the realities of world politics are inevitable and undoubtedly creep into the rulings and votes that are reached.”
The International Criminal Court (“ICC”) is also not without political interference. Human Rights Watch states: “The ICC has [ ] faced intense political attacks and judicial setbacks, including lack of support in making arrests, and too-limited resources from ICC member countries to match its growing workload.”
The ICC was established during the UN General Assembly in Rome in 1998. While it is supposedly independent and not officially part of the UN, it has an agreement with the UN to assist it in its investigations and provide security in its operations. The ICC’s relationship with the UN is provided for in Article 2 of the Rome Statute. This may explain why the many cases filed with the ICC regarding covid crimes against humanity have never been heard.
The UN is not the benign creature it is cracked up to be. It is supposed to become the “One World Government” and is currently rolling out Agenda 2030, with its nefarious “sustainability goals.” A One World Government with a one world health organisation, WHO, and a one world court, the ICJ and the ICC.
Just as we have discovered in our own countries about our own governments, most people trust the UN and that may well be the root of our problem.
Related: Dr. Jacob Nordangård: ‘UN, WEF and G20 form the Troika of Global Governance’
Further reading on crimes against humanity perpetrated on the South African population by its government:
- They said it was “safe and effective”; covid vaccine contracts with the South African government show it was a lie
- South African government deploys 3,500 soldiers ahead of National Shutdown protest
- South Africa’s Web of Lockdown Contradictions and Untruths
- Covid Lockdowns Caused Chronic Poverty and Starvation in Zimbabwe and South Africa
- Calls Grow for South African President Cyril Ramaphosa to Be Removed from Office and Investigated
- The Covid Narrative Falls Apart in South Africa
- South Africans Rise Up and the Police Fail Epically
- South Africa: Health Care Workers Are Harassed by Police While Trying to Carry Out Their Duty to Save Lives
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help power The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful journalism for the years to come…
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
such as Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal
are trying to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
We are being heavily censored. Please share this article…
Categories: Breaking News, World News
of course the govt of SA is not doing the genocide, its black haters of White people….. some officials have said some things while with Israel its a very common statement and sentiment of both the people generally and officials…. the facts SA presented stand on their own and even if there is a certain amount of hypocrisy involved the facts should not be denied and just pushed away…
the more the flag of a false democracy is waved and the more some self-imposed and parasitic organizations arrogate their functions and false goals, the more such crimes take place and go unpunished. the rest is dust in the eye. sterile and hypocritical statements while people are in fact defenseless and without hope of help. this denotes the fact that all crimes have the support of criminals who call themselves defenders of justice.
there is no other explanation. all this could be stopped if there was a will, but they know very well that there is no one to punish them.
Why are the USA, the UK, France, et al. doing nothing to stop the Israeli genocide in Palestine AND the Saudi Arabian genocide in Yemen whilst actively contributing towards them AND doing nothing to stop the genocide in Zimbabwe?
Why are you asking why, you should know until now.
The question is for purpose to rise he general awareness of this problem.
Accurate statement. In Canada I am ashamed that our gov stands back and does nothing. Why? One reason is our Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance is Chrystia Freeland, who sits on the Board of Trustees of the World Economic Form. IMO she was placed in Canada to see it destroyed by whatever means (needles, extreme debt, etc.)
Grow up.
The ANC Government was the product of the vicious Boer apartheid, with its secret police and assassinations. I still don’t know where my friend’s body is, him being killed because he was allied to Steve Biko.
No rebellion that grew out of repression becomes a model government. That takes decades. Face facts. Show me a moral government today. Any leader who attempted this was killed by the CIA. The cold reality is the SA Government acted while all others feared Zionist reprisals. That puts it morally head and shoulders above all but the Houthi, Syrians, Hezbollah and Iran. I have a long memory and I will be tapping certain individuals on the shoulder who did not act.
Hi Tony Ryan, did all crimes in South Africa miraculously stop in 1994?
Do you realise that the majority of murder victims in South Africa are black people? Do you realise that the majority of covid crimes perpetrated by the South African government are committed against black people? Do you think that when all the commercial farmers are gone and food production is destroyed, it is mostly black South Africans that will starve to death? Do you think Steve Biko and his supporters would approve of the current South African’s policies and actions or would they be crying foul play and calling for Ramaphosa’s resignation as South Africans are today?
Anti-white racism does exist. White people are by far the minority group in South Africa. Racism can be found within all religious, national and ethnic groups – fortunately, the world over, it is a minority of people who have given in to this mindset and it only becomes potentially genocide or ethnocide when a state or a well funded, well equipped militia (terrorists) hold these views and act on them.
Someone who’s outlook is tainted with racist views, regardless of which group is being targeted, is unable to view the world objectively. This enables crimes of this nature to perpetuate, because racism prevents objective analysis of what is happening. Do you think this could one of the reasons why they instigate and use racist ideologies? To divide and conquer? To cover up their crimes? To push forward with their agenda?
As long as you use the word ‘black’ I know you have no grasp of this subject.
Hi Tony Ryan, do you or have you lived in Africa? If not, have you visited Africa?
Hi Rhoda,
Where have we seen this killing of farmers before.
In Russia the Bolsheviks put all the farmers into gulags, and stole all their land. Because they could not farm, they asked the US for food.
Same happened in South Africa, They could not farm and asked for food from the US.
Can you see a plan here.
The UK was only bothered about the diamonds.
Hi Dave, I agree with you. The plan is global.
Talking of more than just the farming, they have been testing out how to implement different aspects of it in Africa for many decades (and I’m sure other places they could keep off the news cycle as well) before they rolled out an adjusted version to the West. China, their special project, is far down the road and is considered the role model to aspire to. Russia is broadly following the same plan. It truly is global.
“broadly following”?
lol
Rhoda, Dear Rhodaa…..
Remember that I have and still continue to replenish the best, most detailed and most thorough archive (which is why it is also unprecedented) on the Internet, of the great reset in Russia, indicating all the necessary open sources, which unequivocally shows that Russia is strictly following exactly the same plan. But, of course, even after 300 or 400 detailed comments of mine, Exposé remained perfectly indifferent to them, without the slightest desire to integrate them into the knowledge of current reality. This avomatically raises the question “And of which plan is Expose a part?”
; – )
…More specifically, the narrative of what is happening in Palestine is a continuation of the narrative of “falling American hegemony,” which began with the chapter on Ukraine in early 2022. But, I recently read Lavrov on the website of the Foreign Ministry, and he said that the “fall of American hegemony” began already in the “covid pandemic”. So “pandemic”-Ukraine-Palestine. And “American hegemony,” according to popular belief, is also “Zionist hegemony”; USA + Israel, best friends, you know… American/Zionist hegemony is falling, while multipolarity is growing, and all without exception are following the path of moving to a new technological order.
But, what can I explain to you, live in your half-hearted fairy tales and be alive and well ; ) : )
Very accurate statements. Our problem is communist run by you know who. The Holodomors were one the largest death sprees in history – est. 66 – 100 MILLION died horrific deaths. Germany and it’s allies/supports tried to stop Europe from becoming communism…to no avail.
This one court case is a step in the right direction. Look at German history … we’ve been told lie after lie, lie, lie, lie. Do you know who Hitler’s personal body guard was? His name is Emile Maurice, a Jew …. and he was the founder of the SS, later known as the Waffen SS. 150,000 fought for Germany to stop communism. So, did Hitler hate Jews? … nope. Propaganda BS, as always. We all must work on our countries to rid the rot.
Hi
Sleuth 101,
Interesting comments.
I did read that Hitler and Stalin were at Chatham House house together, in the 1930’s.
Stalin was not his real name either.
Stalin’s real name was Dzhugasvili Coba. Jewish. Not sure of the reason they were both at Chattam House … that’s interesting. Can you provide more info? Source? Thx.
Well said. Our gov in Canada is known to be corrupt and Freeland, who sits on the WEF Trustee Board ensures it stays that way. I watched the entire presentation of the ICJ – it was beyond exceptional. So much so I wish I were South African. This country stood for humanity … forget the smut and propaganda BS that will float to discredit SA – I will never forget their actions to stop the madness. Israel stole the country of Palestine (like it does globally) …it had no rights to that land. The Balfour Declaration was a crime against humanity in and of itself. IMO
Hi Sleuth 101,
https://tapnewswire.com/2024/01/so-sorry-about-tomorrow/#clip=47tqhwbslz0g.
What do you make of this ?
Israel attacked itself and blamed the Palestinians.
They were bribed by Iran.
Are you speaking of Oct &? Provide evidence. Thx.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2024/01/international-public-notice-country-v.html
International Public Notice: Country v. Territory
Territorial land is different in that it is held in a custodial capacity and occupies a different jurisdiction — for example, Puerto Rico is a Territory of The United States, but politically, it is a British Commonwealth.
So all this while, the British Raj (Territorial Government) has been acting as a British Protectorate and establishing a Territory to rule over Australia the country, using the corporations Australia, Inc. and AUSTRALIA (INC.) to administer this Protectorate, and it has been established under the idea that the people failed to set up a new government after the end of the Commonwealth.
So, you have the country, Australia, which appears on old maps as Terra Australis (Latin version), and you have the Territorial Protectorate, also called Australia, and you have Australia, Inc. and AUSTRALIA (INC.) all in the mix.
Here we have the country known as The United States (National) and also as The United States of America (International) and we have the United States of America (British Territorial United States) and the United States (Papist Municipality) and the United States, Inc., and the United States of America, Inc., and the UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, etc., etc.
Between the incorporated and unincorporated versions and all these similar names, it gets very confusing, but the bottom line is:
Australia, aka, Terra Australis, is a country.
Australia is also the name of the territory claimed and protected by Australia.
Australia, Inc. is a British Crown Corporation.
AUSTRALIA, INC. is a Roman Municipal Corporation.
The essential difference between “Australia” the country and “Australia” the territory, is the political status of the people who live in the country versus the political status of the persons inhabiting a separate part of the country, and to understand this, you must understand the British Caste System.
Men and women live in the country. They have Natural and Unalienable Rights. They are free men and women.
Humans, male and female, inhabit the territory. They are indentured servants, public or otherwise. They have timed tours of duty.
Corporations known as PERSONS inhabit municipal districts, parishes, etc. They are slaves, public or otherwise.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2024/01/international-public-notice-why-britain.html
http://www.paulstramer.net/2024/01/international-public-notice-any-fight.html
http://www.paulstramer.net/2024/01/international-public-notice-israel-is.html
International Public Notice: Israel is Not a State
“Israel” is the name of a chunk of land in the Middle East rented as a holdover from the former British Protectorate by Jacob Rothschild using a 99 year lease which is now expired.
Seeking to promote a similar protectorate status, the United States of America, Incorporated, has apparently granted Israel status as a State-of-State and used the old “Confederate State” confusion to make it appear that Israel is a State of the Union.
Everyone needs to learn that a State is geographically defined and holds complete general jurisdiction over the land, soil, water, and air within its borders.
A “Confederate State” sometimes erroneously referred to as a “State” is in fact a “State of State” or instrumentality of a State used to conduct business.
Such State of State entities are not necessarily run by the State employing them, but may be run by separate subcontractors — as in the current situation in this country, where we find that British Territorial States of State organizations have been hired under dubious conditions and substituted for our American States of State organizations.
The habit of loosely calling these organizations “States” has contributed to much mischief and misunderstanding and needs to be fully explicated.
There may be a “State of Israel” in the same sense that there is a “State of Alabama”, but neither of these entities is a State of the Union. Both are instead “Confederate States” run as business franchises by foreign subcontractors — and are not actual States like Alabama, Florida, Minnesota, and Wyoming.
The actual business structure is that a British Territorial Corporation doing business as the United States of America, Incorporated, has established fifty franchise corporations each doing business as “the State of _________”.
These entities came in after The American Civil War and substituted themselves for similar American entities doing business as, for example, The State of Oregon, which was secretly replaced by the British Territorial entity, the State of Oregon.
I watched the presentation of South Africa’s reasons for their charge to the ICJ by the Irish lawyer. I was struck by her saying early on that South Africa doesn’t want to exclude itself from prosecution for genocide if that is the case. While certainly what’s going on in SA is terrible, we should be thankful that, in spite of that, they’ve had the courage to take Israel to court.
Government of South Africa
https://www.gov.za/news/speeches/president-cyril-ramaphosa-inaugural-presidential-science-technology-and-innovation