Breaking News

3 years after serious safety issues were reported AstraZeneca withdraws its covid vaccine worldwide

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Please share our story!


The Oxford-AstraZeneca has withdrawn its Covid-19 vaccine worldwide.  The decision to withdraw the vaccine was made on 5 March but came into effect on 7 May.  It brings to an end the use of the injection and comes months after AstraZeneca admitted for the first time in court documents that it can cause “rare” and dangerous blood clots.

The Oxford-AstraZeneca injection was sold under the brand names Vaxzevria in Europe and Covishield in India.

As reported by The Telegraph on Tuesday, the pharmaceutical giant said its covid injection was being removed from markets for commercial reasons. The company reported a decrease in the demand for Vaxzevria due to emerging covid variant vaccines and initiated the global withdrawal of its covid vaccine on 7 May, following the increased availability of newer vaccines.

In response to AstraZeneca’s decision to withdraw Vaxzevria, the Serum Institute of India said on Wednesday that “from the outset, [it] had disclosed all rare and very rare side effects” of its Covishield vaccine in 2021.

Professors Martin Neil and Norman Fenton remind us that in March 2021 – four months after the mass covid injection campaigns began – the alarm bells of the harmful effects of the injections were already being rung while corporate media hailed the Oxford covid vaccine as “100% effective.”

Before we get to the two professors, a word of caution. A paper published in Nature Nanotechnology on Monday, the day before AstraZeneca withdrew its covid vaccine, shows that AstraZeneca may be withdrawing from the covid vaccine market but Oxford University is not.  

It is claimed that covid is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, a coronavirus. Before the covid era madness, it was known that there are seven coronaviruses that infect humans.  Coronaviruses were first identified in the 1960s but have likely been circulating for centuries, causing common colds.  It’s important to note that included in the seven that infect humans are three so-called “new” coronaviruses – SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 – of which at least two are known to have nefarious origins. In an attempt to hide the “new” coronaviruses true origins it has been claimed:

  • SARS-CoV, which caused the 2002-2004 SARS outbreak, is thought to have originated from bats, with the intermediate host being civet cats.
  • MERS-CoV, which causes Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, is believed to have originated from bats, with the intermediate host being dromedary camels.
  • SARS-CoV-2, which causes covid-19, is thought to have originated from bats, with the intermediate host being an unknown animal, possibly a pangolin or another animal.

Read more: Operation Warp Speed? Pfizer patented the spike protein for a coronavirus vaccine over 30 years ago

In a collaboration between the universities of Oxford, Cambridge and California Institute of Technology, researchers have developed a vaccine with a new approach called “proactive vaccinology,” where a vaccine is developed before the disease-causing pathogen even emerges.  The vaccine, “Quartet Nanocage,” is expected to commence phase one clinical trials in early 2025.

According to Mint, the new vaccine functions by instructing the body’s immune system to identify particular regions of eight distinct coronaviruses, encompassing SARS-CoV-1, SARS-CoV-2, and several strains presently prevalent in bats, which hold the potential to cross over to humans and trigger a pandemic.

The University of Oxford’s Rory Hills, the first author of the report, said, “Our focus is to create a vaccine that will protect us against the next coronavirus pandemic and have it ready before the pandemic has even started.”

“We are also applying this technology to protect against other groups of viruses that can infect humans. All of this brings us closer to our vision of developing a library of vaccines against viruses with pandemic potential before they have had the opportunity to cross over into humans,” Hills said.

Now let’s remind ourselves of their previous attempt to develop and market a “safe and effective” coronavirus vaccine.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Vaccine Efficacy and Safety: A Timely Reminder of Our Early Warnings

By Professor Martin Neil and Professor Norman Fenton

With the formal withdrawal of the AstraZeneca vaccine, it’s appropriate to remind people of this double-page spread in The Times, March 2021, that hailed the AstraZeneca vaccine as 100% effective. But note the article highlighted bottom right on the double-page spread.

This is the article by Tom Whipple with the headline: ‘Academics back ‘bizarre’ claim that jabs may kill’.

Two of the four “Queen Mary University of London” academics were Norman and Martin. The online version of this article explicitly named Norman as one of the academics:

While we are proud that we did indeed raise the alarm about safety issues with the covid vaccines so early on, Whipple’s article was inaccurate in many respects as detailed HERE. Moreover, it was used as the basis for Norman’s Wikipedia entry to be hacked with him being labelled as spreading “covid-19 misinformation.” 

Read more: How Wikipedia defames and delegitimises anybody raising concerns against the WHO narrative on Covid

While AstraZeneca may only have just been formally withdrawn, few are aware that general practitioners were no longer offering it in the UK as early as the end of May 2021 because of safety issues – you could still get it in principle but had to specifically request it. That was weeks before Sarah Gilbert got that standing ovation at Wimbledon for leading the AstraZeneca development.

Read more: AstraZeneca’s second most lethal batch

About the Authors

Norman Fenton is a Professor Emeritus of Risk Information Management at the Queen Mary University of London.  He is also a Director of Agena, a company that specialises in risk management for critical systems. He is a mathematician by training whose current focus is on critical decision-making and, in particular, on quantifying uncertainty using causal, probabilistic models that combine data and knowledge (Bayesian networks).  The approach can be summarized as “smart data rather than big data.”

Martin Neil is a renowned expert in the fields of Computer Science and Statistics. He is a full Professor at Queen Mary, University of London, where he is also the Director of the UKRI Centre for Doctoral Training in Safe and Trusted AI. His research interests focus on Bayesian modelling and risk quantification in various areas, including artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data science.

Together, the two professors author a Substack page titled ‘Where Are the Numbers’.

Featured image: Professor Sarah Gilbert, Professor of Vaccinology at the Jenner Institute (right).  Source: The story behind the Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine success, UK Research and Innovation, 30 November 2021

Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.

The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.

Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.

Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Please share our story!
author avatar
Rhoda Wilson
While previously it was a hobby culminating in writing articles for Wikipedia (until things made a drastic and undeniable turn in 2020) and a few books for private consumption, since March 2020 I have become a full-time researcher and writer in reaction to the global takeover that came into full view with the introduction of covid-19. For most of my life, I have tried to raise awareness that a small group of people planned to take over the world for their own benefit. There was no way I was going to sit back quietly and simply let them do it once they made their final move.

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
daisy
daisy
1 year ago

What was laughable was the BBC Radio4 News said it was withdrawn simply because the original Covid Virus it was designed for, doesnt exist anymore because it had mutated. Not a word about safety concerns. Whilst the news media lies, people will still go to my local chemist who have a big sign in their window stating “Come and get your Flu and Covid shot here” . I despair.

Stuart-james.
Stuart-james.
1 year ago

Well the deed is complete now, isn’t it!

Sam
Sam
1 year ago

What evidence is there for the “seven coronaviruses that infect humans”? How exactly were coronaviruses “first identified in the 1960s”?

All coronaviruses have “nefarious origins” because they are in-silico constructs that do not exist in the real world. They are psy-op terror weapons.

What evidence is there that computer generated coronaviruses
“hold the potential to cross over to humans and trigger a pandemic”? It is clear to anybody who has studied virology and epidemiology that there has never been a genuine pandemic at any time in history.

Unless everybody understands the true nature of the virus and pandemic fraud this will be our future:

“All of this brings us closer to our vision of developing a library of vaccines against viruses with pandemic potential before they have had the opportunity to cross over into humans.”

There are no pathogenic viruses, there are no pandemics, and all of the shots developed on the basis of this fraud are designed to damage health and kill people.

trackback
1 year ago

[…] Source: https://expose-news.com/2024/05/09/3-years-after-serious-safety-issues-were-reported-astrazeneca-wit… […]

john galt
john galt
1 year ago

AZ can see the tremendous liability that is coming down the pike for their killer jabs. The immunity granted them, Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J will not protect them from claims for fraud and the deliberate introduction of a dangerous product into commerce with knowledge of its ineffectual results. Total scam that so many have been completely hoodwinked by. Tragic hardly begins to describe the carnage they have caused.

Belinda
Belinda
Reply to  john galt
1 year ago

Our PM Sunak should be brought to justice. He owns many shares in Moderna & promoted these jabs as ” Safe & Effected”. My own father was harmed by the AZ injections. His last one was administered in April 2021after they knew there was a problem with blood clots.

julal
julal
1 year ago

The liability needs to come back into force so these people can be held liable for the horrific harm they have caused. No good withdrawing after the horse has bolted

trackback
1 year ago

[…] has now admitted in court documents that its covid vaccines cause blood clots and has withdrawn its covid vaccine due to “a decrease in […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] BY RHODA WILSON ON MAY 9, 2024 • ( 12 COMMENTS ) […]

John Steeples
John Steeples
1 year ago

Vaccines should stop people who make the vaccine go to court and then go to prison for the rest of their lives UK hide these people
United Kingdom used the great country now no good whatsoever