|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
During the covid era we have already seen that certain policies which turned out to be extremely harmful were applied to people who were perceived to be “more vulnerable.”
Is it possible that the unvaccinated were also treated as “more vulnerable” and marked for “special treatment”?
Jonathan Engler investigates.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Were the unvaccinated treated (literally) differently from the vaccinated?
By Jonathan Engler, 17 May 2024
A couple of months ago I reported on a paper by Martin Neil, Norman Fenton and Scott McLachlan in which they systematically analysed all the covid vaccine studies they could find and categorised them by the extent to which the authors had mis-categorised vaccinated subjects as unvaccinated, thereby massively biasing the results in favour of the vaccines.
Read more: The extent and impact of vaccine status miscategorisation on covid-19 vaccine efficacy studies by Martin Neil, Norman Fenton and Scott McLachlan, Jonathan Engler, 9 March 2024
They found this: Every single study was subject to serious miscategorisation bias.
Bad enough as that seems, this may not be the worst of it.
This miscategorisation error on its own will introduce significant bias even if the vaccinated and unvaccinated receive the same standards of care.
But what if they didn’t receive the same standard of care?
What if the unvaccinated received treatments which worsened their outcomes? This would act synergistically with the above to bias the results even further.
Is this unthinkable? No, I don’t think it is, and I had always suspected that differential hospital treatment protocols might have been a factor in the adverse outcomes for the unvaccinated reported by many healthcare professionals after the covid vaccine rollout.1
It is important to realise that this would be the case whether or not this was the intended outcome, and herein I am not intending to make inferences in that regard. Suffice it to say that the covid era was characterised by a series of drivers which resulted in harmful things being done to many people.2
We have already seen that certain policies which turned out to be extremely harmful – for example, “shielding” – were applied to people who were perceived to be “more vulnerable.”
It is therefore not beyond the bounds of possibility that the unvaccinated too were also treated as “more vulnerable” and marked for “special treatment.” How confident can we be that such treatments were beneficial, rather than harmful? Based on everything else recommended (or mandated or coerced) during the covid era, not very.
Is There Any Evidence of This?
Yes, there is.
Robert Kogon has sent me links to several tweets, which can be found HERE, HERE and HERE and I said I’d amplify these by way of a short Substack piece, which has become a lot longer than I intended. Be sure to read the entire threads in the case of the first two of these.
1. The first Twitter thread shows that from at least June 2022 in official WHO guidance ‘Clinical management of covid-19’ lack of vaccination was regarded as a factor increasing the risk of severe disease.
The document is clear that “treatment selection is determined by disease severity and risk factors.” (My emphasis.)
The link in that section to the “COVID-19 Clinical care pathway” leads to a document containing the following guidance.
Firstly, being unvaccinated is reiterated as a risk factor for severe disease:
Secondly, under the “respond” section:
Note the disparity here:
- For mild/moderate disease with no risk factors: supportive care at home
- For the same mild/moderate disease WITH risk factors: consider Nimatrelvir/ritonavir3 (oral), Molnupiravir (oral) or Remdesivir (intravenous).
You don’t need to be a genius to realise that a decision to give an intravenous drug would ordinarily mean hospital admission.
2. The second Twitter thread (by Josh Walkos) is centred on illustrating some of the financial drivers towards certain treatment choices, which – though undoubtedly a huge factor – I won’t expand on here as this article is more focused on evidence for differential treatment policies.
THIS US National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) document contains the following section:
Under the section describing ‘Therapeutic Management’:
The same disparity as above is evident here. For patients “in hospital but supplemental oxygen not required” (so those with mild illness):
- All patients – even dexamethasone not recommended
- Patients at high risk of progressing to severe disease – Remdesivir for immunocompromised and “other high-risk patients” (i.e. the unvaccinated).
THIS US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) guidance ‘Underlying Medical Conditions Associated with Higher Risk for Severe COVID-19: Information for Healthcare Professionals’ reiterates the above:
3. The third tweet refers to the below extract of THIS document describing covid-19 treatments from authorities in the Canadian Province of Saskatchewan:
Whilst this is expressed in exclusionary terms – “Remdesivir is ONLY recommended for…” – it seems clear that the implication is that it should be considered for healthy 55 to 69-year-olds with mild symptoms.
Evidence from Australia is Even More Damning
The anonymous blogger known as Jikkyleaks uncovered some further details about Australia – see THIS Twitter thread.
In the above tweet, Jikkyleaks gives a link to a document which no longer works, but I found it on the Wayback Machine HERE.
If you follow the chart from my red annotations, again it is clear that vaccination status is key to risk assessment:
- low risk is associated with symptomatic treatment/observation
- for higher risk – including being unvaccinated – Paxlovid is recommended if within 5 days of symptom onset together with Remdesivir if within 7 days.
Incidentally, the domain clinicalevidence.net.au, the source of the above protocol. is no longer active,4 but from the Wayback Machine we can see that this is an official Australian Government website:
The stated objective of this site is:
The National Clinical Evidence Taskforce is a multi-disciplinary collaboration of 35 member organisations – Australia’s medical colleges and peak health organisations – who share a commitment to provide national evidence-based treatment guidelines for urgent and emerging diseases.
This pioneering alliance established the world’s first “living guidelines” for the care of people with covid-19 and the scope has now expanded to include MPX.
The Taskforce undertakes continuous evidence surveillance to identify and rapidly synthesise emerging research to develop and update recommendations to ensure Australian clinicians are up-to-date with the latest advice.
Other Factors to Consider
In considering the extent to which the above might be relevant to what patients actually received, I would make the following points:
- Doctors have become extremely protocol-driven as a result of the threat of litigation and the general “dumbing down” of medical education. It is safer and faster to look at a flowchart than to apply critical thinking. So yes, I would expect these protocols to have been followed
- These protocols likely reflected the “zeitgeist” so even where not reduced to documentary form, I would have expected these to have been the principles upon which doctors decided on treatment options.
- The covid era was in general terms characterised by a lockstep and centralised approach to treatment so, even though the above represent just a few documents out of many thousands which must be in existence I would be very surprised if the others said anything which differed from those.
- Fear was a heavy motivating factor in respect of healthcare workers. It was believed that “covid positive” patients were dangerous bioweapons to be avoided. It was even believed that “viral load” was higher in the unvaccinated and hence the unvaccinated posed more of a danger, in which case there would have been a greater propensity to treat vigorously, especially using ventilation,5 believed to protect healthcare workers from aerosolisation of virus particles.
- If the unvaccinated received treatments which were ultimately harmful, on seeing this in front of their eyes the delusional belief systems in operation during the covid era would (in my view) not have led doctors to ask the rational question: “Might these treatments actually be harmful?”
Instead, the “lessons learned” would have been: “look how badly the unvaccinated are doing” and “we need to be even more aggressive in our treatment of the unvaccinated”.
Thereby, a ghastly feedback loop would have ensued.
Come to think of it, there have been a lot of ghastly feedback loops involved during the covid era, most of them involving fear in one form or another.
As Vinay Prasad said: “It is a unique situation in medicine. In our whole medical career, doctors have never been personally afraid the way they were [with covid].”
Footnotes:
- 1 These, of course, were ruthlessly weoponized by the vaccine proponents and amplified across all mainstream media.
- 2 See this piece for a commentary on how HCWs can easily be manipulated by circumstance – either deliberately or not – into doing bad things while thinking they are acting virtuously.
- 3 AKA Paxlovid.
- 4 Its functions seem to have been merged into another group, see here.
- 5 See here for a discussion about the role of ventilation as an accomplice in cases of hospital-acquired pneumonia.
About the Author
Jonathan Engler initially trained in medicine, moving into the pharmaceutical sector. He then established a business which became a world leader in using IT to co-ordinate and automate several clinical trial processes. Having sold that business, Jonathan then retrained as a barrister where he worked for a few years before moving back into business.
You can follow him on Twitter HERE or on his Substack page HERE.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
While not debating the points made, the unvaccinated have been successfully targeted for death another way… Ivermectin.
According to some researchers, Ivermectin causes coma, blindness, cancers, and other unpleasant means of dying.
WTH is wrong with you, I know many people who’ve used Ivermectin to cure their illnesses, plus Ivermectin has cancer curing properties. You should be ashamed writing such BS.
Nothing is wrong with him!
I’ve just stumbled into an article about Ivermectin proven to cause INFERTILTY. I was suspicious long time ago because the Gates foundation – which never wanted any good for any living thing – gave it freely to people in Africa.
https://davidicke.com/2024/04/15/the-light-and-the-dark-side-of-ivermectin/
Icke’s site has a link for the full article.
What illness? Let’s assume the doctors for Covid ethics and their supporters are always right because well, they just are…
Let’s then assume a medicine is prescribed for a certain disease because that’s what a ethical doctor would do. And let’s assume that those ethical doctors support only people with sound ideas against Covid. If IV works against Covid we can assume Covid is caused by a parasite. If an antidepresant works, as Steve Kirisch suggests, we can assume that Covid is “something between the ears” causing some kind of depression. You know, the thing that happens with a lot people if they can’t socialize like during a lockdown. Now, “the good camp” knows what’s right, right? Therefore the conclusion is that both medicines work! One against the effects of lockdown and the other one against the parasites.
Tony, you need to expand your search to more reliable sources of information. Ivermection has saved millions of lives.
Prove it. Apart from legends, prove it.
Ivermectin with all of its side effects like INFERTILITY also acts as anti inflammatory, because of it it may help when the problem is inflammation however there are other drugs to combat with that.
There is almost nothing what can be cured with IV vitamin C, a knowledge they kept hidden from you, cancer cure among others, cheap and easy solution but your health is bad business to them, if you are ill, that makes money, if you die, even better in the middle of a depop agenda.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-sn00351ck
Dr Kory’s view
Re. your 2nd paragraph, I think you mean that there’s nothing that CAN’T be cured with IV Vitamin C.
I’ve taken Vitamin C daily for almost 30 years now, wouldn’t be without it. I refuse to take any so-called ‘prescription drugs’. I also take Vit. D3 daily.
The contradiction is Ivermectin is actually recommended by the CDC for illegal immigrants for treating parasites.
Do better next time … if true the CDC should be arrested and tried for their crimes against humanity. They recommend 2 doses to be safe and effective.
Rather for treating another baby-boom…
“The Free Give Away to the Poorest Countries – WHY?
First, we need to remind ourselves that this is a pharmaceutical drug, not a natural substance. The manufacturer Merck gave away 4.4 billion dollars’ worth of Ivermectin to poor countries in Africa and South America beginning in 1987 for the past 35 years. Merck collaborated with the Task Force for Global Health whose largest funder is the US government. Other major funders include the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, CDC, WHO, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, de Beaumont Foundation, United States Agency for International Development, Sightsavers, Pfizer, Merck & Co., Johnson & Johnson, and GlaxoSmithKline according to Wikipedia, not that I trust Wikipedia information much these days. But the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation website states their involvement as well. It is well known that Bill Gates is pushing depopulation methods such as hiding infertility promoting substances in vaccines and planned parenthood operations a.k.a abortion clinics ….. ”
Anita Baxas MD
The article carries on but with link and the Expose tend to block those comments so for the link part I put an image for those who wish to read more.
“Can You Overdose on Ivermectin? Dr. Pierre Kory’s Answer Will Shock You”
4 billion Ivermectin pills given out – no one has ever died from Ivermectin.
It is very hard to overdose on Ivermectin, you need to take over 100 times the recommended dose.
One of the safest drugs in history.
https://rumble.com/embed/v35ye2u/#?secret=CyoSBrrqiF%22%20data-secret=%22CyoSBrrqiF
I am sorry but how you prove it that no one died because of it?
I don’t think it can be proven on any way but nevertheless, the proven infertility effect of it is bad enough even without dying.
You do have a point, it is always hard to prove that something never happened. I presume that there are no recorded deaths due to Ivermectin, but absence of evidence is not proof that it never happened.
However, considering what he said about how hard it is to take an overdose and that an overdose is not life-threatening, the treatment for an overdose is simply to rest for two or three days and no other treatment is needed, then not a single death to be a very reasonable statement.
“the proven infertility effect” – I haven’t heard of that, do you have a link to the evidence, thanks.
Don’t forget that they told us that these were horse worming tablets and not safe for humans – “you are not a horse” – the FDA. There was a proven campaign of anti-Ivermectin propaganda full of misinformation and lies.
The truthers who said it was safe were telling the truth, hear what the Nobel Prize committee said about it – the greatest contribution to medicine in the 20th Century.
“Medical authorities claim 90% of population suddenly has mysterious new heart syndrome that sounds like SPIKE PROTEIN organ damage” – the American Heart Association (AHA).
https://vaccines.news/2024-05-16-90percent-population-heart-syndrome-spike-protein-damage.html
It isn’t from taking Ivermectin. Ivermectin doesn’t do that.
Here’s what Ivermectin does do – ivermectin can help to dramatically reduce the risk of needing hospitalization.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-05-15-trial-ivermectin-benefits-health-reduces-hospitalization-dramatically.html
really? have you learned nothing…pathetic
Oh, I forgot to ask…do you work for Pfizer?
Nice try.
What a commando to protect its reputation.
The same Big Pharma who put graphene oxide in the covid vax and other injectables surely wouldn’t cause harm with a drug (side effect) because it wants to cure you, save you, etc. Wow and LOL.
Hi Tony Ryan,
Ivermectin is Grapefruit skin and Lemon skin, and has been used for years.
Ah! Dave, I didn’t know that-you’re a fountain of wisdom! not having ever used ivermectin, nor any other drug whatsoever for the past 25 years.
But, perhaps unwittingly I have been taking something near it anyway, for I always have grapefruit every morning for breakfast!
Hi Islander,
Thank you for the comment.
3 skins of each boil and simmer, strain the liquid and drink when cool.
This is why it’s too cheap to use for medicine.
It was indeed a strange comment for Mr. Ryan to make, nevertheless the man is no fool, perhaps some of the ivermectin that you can buy over the counter (unless you know its from a trustworthy source) isn’t what it says on the container/package?
Anyway, if its so easy to make-why not do it yourself? Then you know!
H Both, hydroxycholorquine is a synthetic form of quinine. Quinine is found the in the pith of citrus fruits, in particular lemons and grapefruits. It is also found in the bark of the Cinchona tree (the Quinine tree). Quinine you will be familiar with as it has been a commercial treatment for malaria for many decades. Before it was discovered by western medicine, it had been used by tribes in South America for probably centuries to cure malaria.
Ivermectin (the wonder drug) is a synthetic form of avermectin which is from a bacteria found in a specific location in Japan. Ivermectin you will be familiar with as it has been used commercially to kill worms and other parasites for many decades.
Many billions of doses of both medicines have been used across the world over the decades. Ivermectin is not only effective in humans, it is also used to treat farm and domestic animals. The use for the effective treatment for an increasing variety of diseases keeps been proven for both. As far as I’m aware there are no recorded deaths from either medicine and if there are any side effects of either they are extremely rare and very mild. They are two of the safest medicines on the market from what I can tell.
Rhoda, I remember “quinine” from my g & t drinking days! It was advertised on the label of the tonic water as if it was beneficial to one’s health, which I now know it is!
I’ll start saving my grapefruit and lemon skins…
Quine is not grapefruit ingredient, only a certain type of tree has quinine, grapefruit has something else (can’t recall but google will help).
As about the healthy quinine see print scr. 🙂
Hi Islander, yes quinine is in tonic water. But I’ve noticed in the UK not all tonic water brands have quinine in these days (most have quinine flavouring), in fact I’ve only found one that has quinine in it. (Indian) Tonic water was invented to give to the British soldiers in India to ward off malaria.
Update your knowledge, what you are talking about is not quinine. Quinin in natural form is extracted from a certain type of tree but grapefruit.
It’s not harmless by the way, wikipedia article on Quinine (and its dire side effects) is your friend…
Just came to mind. I remember reading someplace sometime ago that certain fruits like grapefruit. oranges, lemons, mangos etc. are being sprayed with toxins, so how would you know the skins are not contaminated; or indeed what is within?
You could end up going paranoid!?
Abi?
Stay away from it Islander, more than that, watch what you give to animals if you want some offspring…
Above, please have a look to my comments on it.
I don’t think I’ve seen so many comments in such a short time frame-you’ve gone into hyperdrive!!
I am concerned about the toxins they spray on everything.
I am a single person but a paid group to form a commando for disinformation. We all know these groups are exist. The EU looked for trusted voices at the beginning, 450 000 of them. The UK has 77, they have the mockingbird team(?).
This time it was easy as I’ve read the ivermectin-infertility article following Icke’s site and the link to the Baxas’ article, while I was questioning the campaign Ivermectin long ago due to be reluctant to believe that they want any good to us, stuff coming from them is not reliable in my present “dictionary”.
Also read a couple of years ago when it first was mentioned that Gates gave it for free to Africans – what a huge red flag.
While I don’t share your Bible based belief (sorry) I am a humble “guardian” of the creation, imperfect in some point or not (cruelty part), it is still a mirror of an extremely superior intelligence I wouldn’t mess with.
They did. Nanotech in people? MACs? Smart cities? Playing with frequencies and spraying poisons?
The present bunch of psychos who lead this world nowadays didn’t create a thing, they are just ruining everything. If people who notice things (like I sometimes) remain silent, who will help the rest of the people to warn them to be cautious, and they need it. They were once already so easy to mislead (vax for the greater good…)?
It’s the same psychology again and again, “if many say it, it must be true”. Now count the downvotes and Ryan’ comment and say it doesn’t like as if a commando would be downvoting it. Why? Suspicious enough.
Yes, the downvotes are scary!
It can work Dave but there is a thing which not many knows about citrus type fruits especially grapefruit. It has a substance which blocks / interacts with other medicine and food supplements causing a poisoning effect. Eg never ever try ginseng with grapefruit or blood thinner drug with grapefruit but it is not safe with any drugs as changes their effect.
Not knowing the ginseng/grapefruit part I ended up in emergency because of unstoppable bleeding many years ago.
However at least grapefruit and lemon are natural stuff but lab-made molecules so probably do less harm (hopefully).
I would rather try grapefruit than a blood thinner drug any day, and I wouldn’t mix the two. Nature has the answer. Look for a natural blood thinner if you really need it. Natural ways are best.
Are you sure you’re not vaxxed? Because, they save lies you know……
Tony, you are so wrong.
“Ivermectin: enigmatic multifaceted ‘wonder’ drug continues to surprise and exceed expectations.” (https://www.nature.com/articles/ja201711)I´m so sorry to ruin your dreams, but if you are vaccinated, it was your choice, and I respect that. Isn´t it great to be safe?
Nice try anyway, hmm… not.
““It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.”― Marcia Angell”
Anita Baxas (MD)’ article on Ivermectin causing infertility.
I think the popular de-wormer, Panacur is also ivermectin based?
Spacebusters questioned the Ivermectin story long time ago in a video: Ivermectin Friend or Foe.
On my part I trust nothing coming from the big pharma anymore. Absolutely nothing.
Ivermectin could worked for “Covid” (aka. acute irradiation syndrome) for one way, acting as a kind of anti inflammatory drug, while the effect of irradiation is tons of free radicals and inflammations.
I don’t know, I used only high level of Vitamin C (thousands) and cod-liver for other vitamins, sometimes it is a bit slow but I am still here despite being badly EMF sensitive.
I’m classed as extremely clinically vulnerable and refused the gene therapy from the get go they must have hated me lol 😆 and I still wouldn’t give 2 💩’s. They hated that I wouldn’t wear a mask in the hospital as well or take their stupid pcr and lft swabs
Hi Anna britton,
I was refused entry to a UK hospital because I would not have a PCR test.
Egyptians used to do this to cause brain damage to unruly prisoners.
Several people died through this with the PCR test.
Note – “a series of drivers which resulted in harmful things being done to many people” – there must be criminality here – assault, grevous bodly harm, actual bodily harm, ?, and if they died, then it must be murder, but don’t expect any charges to be brought. There is no law any more, as Mark Sexton and Andrew Bridgen are finding out.
There are no laws to prevent one Corporation from killing another Corporation.
Legal fiction persons are Corporations.
Incorporated through the fraudulent birth registration process.
The criminal parasites killed the Corporation (man/woman) first on paper to cash in the life insurance policies attached to the legal fiction person.
Which secondly, killed the flesh.
Identifying as a legal fiction person using multiple NAME’s that are another’s property, is a dangerous business to be in.
The fonts are too small,even when zoomed!
[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]
[…] – Did hospitals mark the covid unvaccinated for “special treatment”? […]
https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/ex-nih-director-confirms-no-science-behind-6-foot-distancing-rules
My 30 year old son has kidney failure and was told no vaccine no transplant for you. I fought their totally biased decision and eventually they allowed him onto the transplant list. Although 3 years on he’s never took any vaccines but hasn’t been called for a transplant, all the other patients diagnosed around the same time have had a transplant, so I can’t help but think that he is still being targeted?? His health is getting worse by the day, dialysis is failing to do the job now, but still nothing from the transplant team. I pray I’m wrong and he will get his transplant before it’s too late for him, but I can’t help but wonder if his refusal to take the vaccine is responsible for his wait??
Hi Ellie Car,
Sorry about your son.
I am not a doctor, it is worth a try to use Chlorine Dioxide,
It is available from camping stores.
Dr Humble uses this called MMS.
Contact Tucker Carlson.
It was a good indication, early on, that there was extreme bias in the treatment of the unvaccinated when certain doctors said that the unvaxxed deserved to die for their selfish behavior.
Maybe our great, great grandchildren will receive reparations for the mistreatment we have endured?
[…] Did hospitals mark the covid unvaccinated for “special treatment”? During the covid era we have already seen that certain policies which turned out to be extremely harmful were applied to people who were perceived to be “more vulnerable.” Is it possible that the unvaccinated were also treated as “more vulnerable” and marked for “special treatment”? […]
[…] Fuente Expose […]
The medical system is a disgrace. These doctors KNEW what was going on. They did what they did for $$$$$. I don’t know how they sleep at night.
[…] Read More: Did hospitals mark the ‘covid’ unvaccinated for “special treatment”? […]
[…] Read More: Did hospitals mark the ‘covid’ unvaccinated for “special treatment”? […]
[…] Read More: Did hospitals mark the ‘covid’ unvaccinated for “special treatment”? […]
See Dr. John Campbell’s latest videos about DNR notices. He shows some of the testimonies at the Scottish Inquiry.