|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Although the pandemic industry claims otherwise, one hundred years of discovery and evidence show that “zero covid” is impossible to achieve. Yet this is the idea that many governments and their collaborators pushed during the covid era.
It is ignorance of the history of discovery and study of respiratory viruses over the last 100 years that ensures that distorted and unrealistic messages such as “zero covid” are easily spread.
What Dr. John Snow discovered more than 100 years ago is still relevant today. He said in the 1850s that when an agent has run out of susceptibles, its circulation sharply declines in a matter of days or weeks.
Dr. John Snow was a British surgeon and general practitioner who is considered one of the founders of epidemiology, the study of the spread of diseases. In 1854, he investigated a cholera outbreak in London’s Soho neighbourhood, which was a major turning point in the understanding of the disease.
Snow began by mapping the cases of cholera, noting that they were concentrated around a particular water pump on Broad Street (now Broadwick Street). He also interviewed local residents and collected data on the cases.
Snow’s investigation led him to conclude that the outbreak was caused by contaminated water from the Broad Street pump. He discovered that the pump was located near a cesspit, which was a common source of sewage and waste. Snow’s data showed that people who drank water from the pump were more likely to contract cholera than those who did not.
Below is the fifth of a series of 18 posts by Trust the Evidence telling the story of Dr. John Snow (1813-1858), a pioneer in both anaesthetics and epidemiology.
The 18-part series begins with a brief biographical sketch, followed by Snow’s investigation of the mode of transmission of cholera in Victorian London, his premature death and the near oblivion to which his work was consigned for over 50 years, and its eventual rediscovery and re-publication by the American epidemiologist Wade Hampton Frost. The series follows the evolution of the cholera pandemics of 1848-49 and 1854 and gives some health-political background to the events surrounding them.
The fifth in the series demonstrates that what Dr. Snow discovered regarding an outbreak naturally runs its course because, essentially, it runs out of susceptible people to infect. Yet governments ignored this and implemented draconian measures to “flatten the curve” to slow down the spread of a coronavirus.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
John Snow, Asiatic Cholera and the Inductive-Deductive Method – Republished
By By Prof. Carl Heneghan and Dr. Tom Jefferson
The Snow series is an educational course. We hope you will recognise our efforts by donating to Trust the Evidence or becoming a paying subscriber, as writing the series took a lot of time and effort.
“The duration of cholera in a place is usually in direct proportion to the number of the population.”—John Snow M.D., Mode Of Communication Cholera (second edition), pg. 115
We saw in Lecture 3 that Snow deduced by the presence of an incubation period that the morbid poison of cholera needed time to replicate. Now, he makes a further deduction (page 56).
John Snow MD pg 15
Snow deduced that it must resemble a cell as it reproduces itself inside the body. This deduction is pure logic as no one had then connected what we now call Vibrio Cholerae Pacini to the onset of cholera. The vibrios were visible with a microscope, but as we shall see in Lecture 17, the connection between micro-organisms and disease had been made in a faraway land. Lacking modern communication, the two had not been reconciled.
When you make a logical deduction from true premises, the chances of reaching a rational conclusion are high.
With this deduction, Snow aligns with Fracastoro’s contagium animatum theory (see Lecture 4).
In ‘On the Mode of Communication of Cholera, 1st edition (MCC 1)’, published in 1849, Snow proposed two main modes of transmission.
The first was what we now call a propagated source outbreak. This was mainly due to his observation of the closeness of cases with water, either from rivers, harbours or wells. He assumed these were contaminated not from miasmata but from what he called a “poison” or a “morbid poison” specific to cholera.
In the second edition, MCC 2, he published a table showing the highest mortality among seafarers and longshoremen, presumably due to their contact with contaminated drinking water.
The painting by William Atkins shows the density of vessels in Portsmouth Harbour. Both HMS Victory in the middle ground and the troop transport HMS Serapis on the right are shown departing. The hulks in the background had crews and were used as living accommodations with no sanitary facilities. Everything went overboard, creating a pool of contaminated water.
This was more concentrated, and the poison multiplied when there was little rainfall and in the heat, which explained some of its apparent capriciousness.
Contemporary Themes
Contemporary ignorance of the history of discovery and study of respiratory viruses from 1936 to today ensures that distorted and unrealistic messages such as “zero covid” are easily spread.
Watch the video below.
These have had the catastrophic effect of inducing governments into introducing draconian measures in the “short sharp shock” tradition of “do it and we are done” and a complete distortion of the precautionary principle. One hundred years of discovery and evidence now show us that zero viral circulation of an agent is impossible to achieve, and the draconian measures massively impact society and its weakest, both personally, socially and economically.
The reason why respiratory viruses “move on” as in the descending curve of Farr’s Law of Epidemics (see Lecture 10) is not completely understood. However, Snow’s aphorism cited at the beginning of this lecture holds true. When an agent has run out of susceptibles, its circulation sharply declines in a matter of days or weeks.
Readings
Robert Dingwall. The precautionary principle. Doing stuff ‘just in case’ is not precautionary. You need evidence. Trust the Evidence 14 November 2022.
Read more: The precautionary principle by Professor Robert Dingwall as published by Trust the Evidence on 14 November 2022
[Note: The article ‘The precautionary principle’ is behind a paywall. On 14 November 2022, The Daily Sceptic published an article by Robert Dingwall titled ‘Doing Stuff Without Evidence is the Opposite of the ‘Precautionary Principle’’. While we do not know how similar the content of the two articles are, The Daily Sceptic article is free to read if you do not have a subscription to read Trust the Evidence articles.]
About the Authors
Carl Heneghan is a professor of Evidence-based Medicine at the University of Oxford, Director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (“CEBM”) and NHS Urgent Care general practitioner who regularly appears in the media. Tom Jefferson is a clinical epidemiologist and a Senior Associate Tutor at the University of Oxford. Together they publish articles on a Substack page titled ‘Trust the Evidence’.
Featured image: The John Snow Pub, London. Source: BBVA Open Mind
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
I’ve appreciated your articles for some time now and one of many things you do especially well is craft the titles to make clear and important points. It’s very helpful and effective and I thank you.
This morning, the Fourth of July in the year of 2024, we are told that “President” Trump, the “Commander-in-Chief” of the British Territorial Corporation doing business as “the United States of America — Incorporated” has given the order to the U.S. Military to disclose what has gone on here.
We are told that in “3 to 5 days everyone will know”.
But will we?
https://annavonreitz.com/sowearetold.pdf
I AM MISSING THE LADIES BRILLIANT AUDIOS ?
[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]
The Lancer published in 2020 that the Pfizer vaccine was 0.84% effective against Covid, which means that Covid was 99.16% effective in infecting you, as events later showed and the other vaccine makers vaccines were not much better with AstraZeneca being the strongest of all of them at around 3.2%, so, if the vaccines were not for Covid, what was their purpose then: But why the vaccines. Why did The WHO mandate the vaccines from 2020 after disinformation laws had been put in place in all of the 196 member WHO countries which donate to WHO, from early 2020 to 2023 and nudging to get the majority of you all vaccinated by telling you their vaccines were safe and effective and what did those vaccines legally make you – do you really want to know the legal back story:
“The Supreme Court (2013) ruled that if there is anything synthetic, not from nature, inside of our genome, then whoever owns the patent on those synthetic parts now owns part or all of you as a human. That means Bill and Melinda Gates, The Department of Defense, [and others] can literally own a human being. If this synthetic code is taken up into your genome, by law, you could be owned overnight.”
The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, affirmed. It ruled, in part:
Living, man-made micro-organism is patentable subject matter as a “manufacture” or “composition of matter” within the meaning of the Patent Act of 1952. The fact that the organism sought to be patented is alive is no bar to patentability.
Patentability of human genes (mRNA and DNA)
Ultimately the Supreme Court ruled that only cDNA (synthetic DNA) is patentable. Isolated, natural DNA is not patentable, But in a nutshell, biotechnology companies can own living things if said things are genetically-modified and not naturally-occurring.
The synthetic mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna, along with the viral vector DNA delivery systems of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, change your genetic code, making you “genetically-modified.” Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks tells you straight up that 1) the shots change your genetic code and 2) the shots do not stop the spread of COVID-19. He says the Moderna shot is “hacking the software of life”
Viral vectors do the same thing.
So do these companies “own you” once you get the shots? Well, they own mice and bacteria created with their inventions. Once you get these shots, you are no longer a “naturally-occurring” human being.
You are now “legally” a Trans Human with zero Rights of any kind, like the Slaves prior to the end of the US Civil War 1861-1865 because zero Laws have been written for Trans Humans who never existed before 2020. Actually, you are owned in America by the US Army who paid for the vaccine shots and distributed them, under Trump’s Warp Speed, see DOD Pfizer contract paragraph 3 down, Trump being the only person with the authority he gave himself to sign those Covid Vaccine Contracts, supply to 2027.
Donald Trump’s tenure as the 45th president of the United States began with his inauguration on January 20, 2017, and ended on January 20, 2021. Wikipedia – note “2017-2021″
The Defense Production Act has played a role in the U.S. government’s response to COVID-19 (from about November 1st 2019 US virus release date ) pandemic.
President Trump declared a national emergency in March 2020, making the pandemic eligible for government action under the Defense Production Act.
President Trump said he invoked the Defense Production Act more than 100 times to facilitate Operation Warp Speed.
The vaccinated are countermeasure prototypes, for the US Army, to see the objective of a Covid-19 (vaccines) countermeasure, in the impairment of the operational effectiveness of enemy activity” by spike protein,the most antigenic and toxic part of a coronavirus” (vaccine) based on the measurable effects of their (the vaccines) deployment”, by the US military’s own definitions of terms used in Operation Warp Speed contracts, the (vaccine) products it commissioned “amount to bioweapons” and the vaccinated are part of the US Army experiment to see the effectiveness of their Covid-19 vaccines weapon, as explained below:
The injection of these “countermeasure prototype vaccines” which satisfy the US military definition of a biological agent into people has killed some recipients and permanently disabled increasingly large numbers of others, “resulting in their (vaccines) operational effectiveness based on the measurable effects of their (vaccines) deployment”, by the US military’s own definitions of (vaccines) terms used in Operation Warp Speed contracts, the (vaccines) products it commissioned “amount to bioweapons”.
The US military defines a biological agent as a micro-organism (or toxin derived from it) that causes disease.
Vaccines are regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration as biological products, therefore they can be described as biological agents.
The mRNA (ModRNA) products instruct recipients cells to make a form of its spike protein, the most antigenic and, some researchers argue, toxic part of a coronavirus.
Since December 2020, 5.5 billion people, 72 per cent of the global population, have been injected with Covid-19 vaccines commissioned under Operation Warp Speed by the US Army “as countermeasure prototypes”, by 2024 at least 8 billion people out of 8.5 billion people have been vaccinated with these bioweapons.
This is the US Army contract with Pfizer for the supply of the vaccines which Trump signed (TO 2027) and which the US Army then supplied to all – for Trump’s Operation Warp Speed, which you will see referenced third paragraph down.
https://www.keionline.org/misc-docs/DOD-ATI-Pfizer-Technical-Direction-Letter-OTA-W15QKN-16-9-1002-21July2020.pdf
Gene therapy is irreversible.
From Dr. geert Vanden Bosche’s substack judy 4, 2024
https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=555295&post_id=146279682&utm_source=post-email-title&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=ypmr9&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo1ODMwMjgzNywicG9zdF9pZCI6MTQ2Mjc5NjgyLCJpYXQiOjE3MjAxMDMyMjUsImV4cCI6MTcyMjY5NTIyNSwiaXNzIjoicHViLTU1NTI5NSIsInN1YiI6InBvc3QtcmVhY3Rpb24ifQ.BKnwRKbuzPNnLULaRVhW89iSeLEcANm5TGb1GOL5rtY
The English have it even worse.
Proud or pride?
https://annavonreitz.com/thinkitsbadhere.pdf
The most recent pandemic fiasco is nothing but a thinly veiled scheme to collect on the life insurance, reduce the aging (and expensive) baby boomer population, and set up new business opportunities (that is, spread diseases via injection) for the for-profit health services industry owned and operated as franchises of the crooked parent corporations responsible for all of this
https://annavonreitz.com/entrapmentbynondisclosure.pdf
Epidemics (e.g. ‘flu’) have been noted to seem to correlate with high points/low points in the 11 year solar cycles, as has been noted in several studies (like Kwan Chul Lee, et al., 2022), e.g. the number of smoothed monthly values of sunspots were the lowest around December, 2019, than they’d been in almost 200 years – approximately when “COVID” was meant to occur.
Source: link (dot) springer (dot) com/article/10.1007/s11356-022-22982-1
So it could be theorised that the next scamdemic will be between Nov, 2024 and Mar, 2026 because that’s when the next high point in the solar cycle is tipped to be:
“…Not surprisingly, solar maximum is predicted to occur midway through Solar Cycle 25, so between November 2024 and March 2026…”
Source: forbes (dot) com/sites/jamiecartereurope/2022/08/02/the-sun-is-now-more-active-than-nasa-predicted-it-could-be-in-its-strongest-cycle-since-records-began/?sh=65be13ebcd59
Interestingly, in possible line with that, an Australian news reporter said a day or 2 ago that the next wave of “COVID” is due this summer.
rumble (dot) com/v55gxe8-new-covid-strain-called-fluqe.-lol (dot) html
Texas, Utah, Kansas, Mississippi, and Louisiana — suing Pfizer
BS. There was never any covid.
Vaccine did it.
Covid vaccine = Covid.
More covid vaccines = Long Covid.
[…] that was explained in detail by Dr. John Snow in the 1850s. The British surgeon is considered a founder of epidemiology, and his investigations into a London outbreak of cholera are considered a significant turning […]
It qwas zero covid from day 1 . It doesnt exist .
[…] em pormenor pelo Dr. John Snow na década de 1850. O cirurgião britânico é considerado um dos fundadores da epidemiologia, e as suas investigações sobre um surto de cólera em Londres são consideradas um ponto de […]
[…] by Dr. John Snow dans les années 1850. Le chirurgien britannique est considéré comme un fondateur de l’épidémiologie, et ses enquêtes sur une épidémie de choléra à Londres sont considérées comme un tournant […]
[…] that was explained in detail by Dr. John Snow in the 1850s. The British surgeon is considered a founder of epidemiology, and his investigations into a London outbreak of cholera are considered a significant turning […]
[…] that was explained in detail by Dr. John Snow in the 1850s. The British surgeon is considered a founder of epidemiology, and his investigations into a London outbreak of cholera are considered a significant turning […]