|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Dr. Mike Yeadon has vehemently stated publicly that “ivermectin is one of the most violent fertility toxins [he has] ever come across.”
In response, Dr. Tess Lawrie reviewed the first study included in an article that Dr. Yeadon shared with her to see if it showed proof that ivermectin caused infertility.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Is Ivermectin Really a Genocidal Tool of the Globalists?
By Dr. Tess Lawrie, 19 August 2024
The Emerged Globalist Agenda
It is now clear to many including me that the globalist agenda is one of eugenics, with the aim of significantly reducing the world’s population and changing the genetics of the remainder of us.
The possibility that ivermectin, through a potential effect on fertility, may be part of the Globalists’ dastardly genocidal plan is a fairly novel one that I will explore here today.
The notion that ivermectin may cause infertility has been floating around since 2021 based on decade-old, mainly animal studies. After scanning such studies in 2021, I did not find the claim to be credible based on the supporting evidence. The animal studies being shared as proof, I found to involve very high doses of ivermectin, given for long periods with very short term follow up. Anything given in high doses, including overdosing on water, can cause harm. In my opinion as a research scientist with expertise in evaluating bodies of evidence, much more research was needed before making a claim that ivermectin is harmful to human fertility.
Back in 2021, when this assertion was doing the rounds on social media, it felt to me to be more like a distraction, as it does now. However, due to repeated public engagement on this topic by my associate in the health and freedom movement, Dr. Mike Yeadon, I have decided to revisit it.
Dr. Yeadon, ex-drug company executive, turned truther, has vehemently stated publicly that “ivermectin is one of the most violent fertility toxins [he has] ever come across.”
I am a little surprised by Dr. Yeadon’s certainty on this matter. However, since Dr. Yeadon’s area of interest in drug development was primarily in respiratory anti-allergy and inflammation drugs, I expect he knows a lot about ivermectin, which is known to be an excellent, low-cost anti-inflammatory and immune-modulating old medicine.
My First Thoughts on Re-Engaging This Topic Are
Ivermectin is used primarily to treat illness. It seems pretty good at clearing parasites and modulating the immune system to help fight inflammation, including inflammation associated with cancer. Its anti-coagulant properties are a bonus for recipients of the covid-19 injections that are known to cause clotting. So, it is being widely used beyond the BIRD recommendations for “covid-19.” As noted by the Nobel Prize awarded in 2015, ivermectin seems to offer immeasurable benefits to humans and animals alike for a variety of conditions.
Some Questions Related To The Circulating Claims Arise
If the Globalists are secretly pro-ivermectin and are delighted that its widespread use for worms and other infections, inflammation and cancer will contribute to genocide, why are all the doctors who use ivermectin being censored and losing their licences? Why aren’t we being embraced into the globalist fold and showered with Gates’ money and media coverage?
Having been given billions of times worldwide, ivermectin clearly hasn’t managed to wipe us out yet so doesn’t seem to be a very good genocidal tool if it is such. Through our air, food and water, there are many more direct ways the globalists can harm and are harming us. In addition, they’re angling for more and forced lipid nanoparticle (“LNP”) biotechnology products to be given by our governments to us in the guise of “vaccines.”
Are the animal studies being shared as evidence that ivermectin causes infertility really reflective of how ivermectin is being used in living men and women?
Let’s Take a Look…
Okay, so I have just taken a look at the first study on Tim Truth’s list[1], the reference shared with me by Dr. Yeadon. It’s a 2015 Iranian study conducted in rabbits[2]. It is not clear whether this particular study underwent ethics approval or peer review. The journal is not indexed.
Here are a few considerations. The study comprises different experiments. In the first experiment, 48 little female rabbits weighing between 1.2 and 2 kilograms were divided into eight groups. Thirty-six (36) were given ivermectin in a daily injection for 8 weeks (56 days). Thus, for rabbits weighing 2 kilograms, for example, the total amount of ivermectin given over the 56 days was 448 mg.
This ivermectin dose is extremely high.
If the equivalent study were to be conducted in human subjects, a total dose for a 60-kilogramme woman would be 13.44 grams. The latter amounts to a daily dose of 240 mg per day for 56 days, which is 20 x 12 mg tablets daily – two strips of 10 tablets for 56 days!
I wouldnt recommend it
What Happened To The Rabbits Receiving Ultra-High Doses of Ivermectin?
The poor little rabbits. After their 56-day trial, they had blood drawn from their hearts for hormone tests. These rabbits were then “sacrificed” and had their liver, kidneys and lungs examined microscopically[3].
Another batch of 48 female rabbits was used for the second experiment. The second batch of rabbits was “treated” the same way as the first batch over 56 days and then mated with fertile male rabbits on two occasions over a two-month period. Most of the rabbits receiving ivermectin did not have offspring during those two months.
What Can We Deduce From This?
Female rabbits given daily ivermectin injections for 56 days at doses 20 times the equivalent dose normally used by humans is associated with infertility in female rabbits up to two months following administration.
Did these female rabbits remain infertile once the ivermectin cleared their system? We don’t know. On the second mating, there were more offspring than the first, so with time it is quite likely that fertility might have returned to normal after a time.
Would giving a human female 20 x 12 mg ivermectin tablets a day for 56 days similarly impact fertility? Quite possibly…
Would it be reversible? Quite possibly … we just don’t know because no scientist is likely to do such a study like this in human beings. It would be pointless and dangerous, wouldn’t it?
Can we deduce from this study that ivermectin is an effective eugenics tool for the Globalist depopulation agenda? No, I don’t think so.
So, we can have a look at the other studies together too – or you can do it yourselves. In general, though, I feel a good dollop of common sense is needed at this stage.
My conclusion related to this one: Animal testing is cruel.
If this study isn’t proof that experimenting on animals should be stopped, I don’t know what is!
In addition, the fact that such a high total dose did not kill the little rabbits seems to prove what pharmacovigilance databases testify to, which is just how SAFE ivermectin is!
Do I think the globalists might try to use ivermectin as part of their depopulation agenda?
Yes, I do. It is clear that the globalists want to get access to our bodies to inject stuff. It occurred to me as far back as 2021 that they may well be planning an ivermectin injection to be rolled out in due course, and we see these being developed by the usual culprits.
So, although the answer to the question above is YES, it is not for the reasons put forward; rather because the ivermectin injection deployed by these sociopaths would most likely contain the same harmful nanotechnology as the covid-19 biotechnology, with LNPs and assorted other toxic ingredients.
I will invite Dr. Mike Yeadon to discuss this and other things soon in a public forum so we can explore this and other interesting matters in this extraordinary time of great change!
Notes:
- [1] Ultimate Guide To Anti-Fertility Ivermectin Genocide: 14 Studies Showing It Wrecks Fertility, Tim Truth, 1 May 2024
- [2] Adverse effects of repeated doses of Ivermectin alone or with the combination of vitamin C on reproductive system of female rabbits, Indian Journal of Applied Research, September 2025
- [3] Histopathological And Biochemical Effects Of Ivermectin On Kidney Functions, Lung And The Ameliorative Effects Of Vitamin C In Rabbits (Lupus cuniculus), ResearchGate, January 2016
About the Author
Dr. Tess Lawrie is a medical doctor and Founding Director of Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy (EbMC) Ltd, a community interest research company. She is also a committee member of the World Council for Health. She founded the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) Group, which critically evaluated the evidence for ivermectin’s use in covid-19 treatment and prevention.
She has a medical degree (MBBCh) and a Doctorate in Philosophy (PhD) from the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa. Whilst she has practised clinical medicine in both the United Kingdom and South Africa, she now only performs non-clinical research work.
Dr. Lawrie has written extensively on the importance of evidence-based medicine and has spoken out against the misuse of scientific research. You can subscribe to and follow her Substack page ‘A Better Way with Dr Tess Lawrie’ HERE.
Featured image taken from Ivermectin for Rabbits – Dosage, Use and Contraindications, Animal Wised, 5 July 2022
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
The Ivermectin Games. Dr. Sam Bailey. ?
Anita Baxas MD, told this, too. Now you can now why they mention parasites all the time.
(I told you – all- so. Again.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqlJveIdpDQ
Thanks for reporting – this story has me intrigued as Ivermectin was seen as an alternative treatment for ‘convid’ – if it even exists. Does this mean that we have all been mislead (again) or that someone has got to Mike Yeadon? I recently felt the same about Dr.Mercola as his views seem to have changed slightly – which is out of character. My spider senses are tingling!
Let God be true, but every man a liar. Romans 3:4.
Not that you need reminding, but this ‘science’ is not settled truth…
Right… some of these guys have started to equivocate. McCullough is another one, believe it or not, who has retreated from some truths. SMH
Almost all are controlled by now, or maybe all. They are allowed to say one thing but they have to deny another and that’s mixed among the louder voices like Yeadon, Mercola (all, who are well known). So far only Dr Tom Cowan remained ‘true’. I just wasted 2+ hours to a “documentary” advised by this site, Dr. Young’s – just to watch how they want to plant more fear. Even the so called professionals gave mixed info in a way that the info makes no sense anymore.
Young is interesting, he proved that the germ theory can’t be true with dark-field microscopy he recorded how bacteria transform to red blood cell and back (depending on the PH of the blood). But that’s not new, Nassens recording were better and far more detailed. Young – at the beginning worked together with La Quinta Columna (the guys who first get the idea of graphene oxide in the shots then examined vials and they were right), they split during the process and before La Quinta Columna’s officially published report (the famous laboratory report of Dr Campra).
Young published photos of the blood, graphene oxide and PARASITES telling that they were also in the shot.
I think Ivermectin was the plan B, for those who didn’t get the vax.
By the way, at the beginning the google told you that Gates’ foundation DONATED tons of Ivermectin in Africa – what does it tell you?
3 years ago (appx) Spacebusters’ documentary was out (Odysee: Spacebusters: Ivermectin Friend or Foe).
Who researched knew that something is fishy with it and it is better to try something else. (On my part it was high dose of vit C and EMF protection but another drug from THEM.)
Interesting info. I do see now on their own site that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation donated $226,944, dated August 2021, “To support the evaluation of a long-acting injectable ivermectin formulation as an endectocide for malaria control”.
It is this article that is misleading you. In the study referred to (which is Iraqi, btw, not Iranian), the rabbits were given *weekly* Ivermectin, not daily. The OP has also managed to double the maximum dose given, thereby calculating total maximum doses that were 14 times the ones actually used.
The maximum dose given was 2mg/kg, so 4mg/week for the largest (2 kg) rabbits, for 8 weeks, meaning a maximum total dose of 32mg. The equivalent for a 60kg woman would be 960mg.
To show clearly observable effects over a matter of weeks in an animal study it makes sense to use higher doses (per kg) than what is typically used by humans (who may use the thing for years). We are not talking multiple orders of magnitude greater here. There is nothing unreliable about this study.
it kills worms. no one noticed that the dewormed were infertile before this.
See if your dog lives if you feed it chocolate.
But we do know chocolate does not kill humans.
Affect them, too, ask the breeders, smaller and smaller puppies born, true for cats, too. I think the popular Panacur is ivermectin based but should be checked, not 100% sure.
This is not a time for DIVISION. Dr. Mike Yeadon has had four yrs to express his concerns regarding ivermectin. Many of us use it, it works.
It is now being used to treat cancer. Big pharma must be extremely threatened.
Kaufman told that it worked similarly to antibiotics, if really that was the case it could cause quick success in a case of radiation pneumonia for example.
Brilliant article. I would agree. Ivermectin is an effective
anti-parasitic, and one we ALL can benefit from. I have used
it, as it is available in horse paste, as in pills. BTW, many
believe that Fenbendazole also kills parasites and cancers
as well. Let us also note that the supply of ivermectin in
pharmacies kind of dried up over a year ago, what a coincidence.
So, i get mine from an overseas supplier.
I found a protocol for parasites (lyme, etcetera) on contrabandcures dot com. However, the amounts of ivermectin they recommend on your
weight, seem to be 50%+ too low. They suggested 11mg for me, but
on a osteopaths site, she had a formula, and my dose was 20mg.
Just recently read an article about how parasites were the best friends of a certain type of fish. Because nothing could get rid of heavy metals in their bodies but parasites. I also read elsewhere (I think it was Amandha Volmer’s material) that parasites appear when your body have too much heavy metals and disappear when you are clean. If that true, you are killing your friends. 🙂
Never fully bought into the Ivermectin as I found it was not needed. Green tea + zinc, nebulizing 3% hydrogen peroxide + saline solution, nattokinase worked fine and what I use now if I feel like I have a cold and just stops symptoms careering out of control and killing me.
Being British and I like tea I actually bothered to grow a dozen green tea bushes because I could.
Anyone that has ever bred rabbits commercially will have several bucks covering does in multiple matings because although they breed like rabbits in the wild it’s not always true in reality.rabbits hate heat and are more prolific breeders during the winter, when were the studies conducted, what we’re the cage set ups, ventilation, etc, there are so many factors with rabbits and their breeding that the experiments are pretty useless altogether
STOP “EXPERIMENTING” ON ANIMALS. It’s all bullsh t. These mixologists think they can play God. And everything & everyone is their plaything. STOP IT!
The jab does.
I’m not defending anyone here, but isn’t it important to acknowledge that as new information and evidence comes to light, that scientists, experts, specialists, doctors, etc can possibly change their view on any given thing?
As new discoveries are made in any area, which is constantly occurring, views change. Is this not significant?
Information becomes outdated and updated as we learn more.
I’ve noticed that Mercola has acknowledged this as his research brings new findings, as have others.
I believe that it’s important to remain open-minded but also discerning.
I do believe Dr. Yeadon is a shill. Of course, his studies showed infertility in the rabbits because he was overdosing them and for 56 days!! Most people know that ivermectin is dosed on body weight and it’s been around and widely used for 60 years plus, so there shouldn’t be any problems. No one goes on ivermectin with such high doses or for that long. Anything in excess can cause illness. I find Dr. Yeadon I little sketchy…🤷♀️
I came to this conclusion, too. For a while I truly hoped he is one among us who tries to resist, when he openly said that there were no respiratory viruses and while they didn’t know what caused the symptoms, they couldn’t be viruses (non existent).
But this is exactly what I try to told to you. One gives you a piece of truth, you build trust, then the fake info comes. I’ve just listened him babbling about spike protein (aka. decomposing cells). Cells are decomposing because of the graphene oxide caused cytokine storm and when they decomposing they “grew” “spikes”. As easy as this, but they still try to push the mRNA, spike protein lies.
I used to think Mike yeadon was genuine but I am losing trust him. Overdosing of ivermectin or any drug will obviously be a negative thing, they tried to discredit hcq in exactly the same way
[…] Source: Rhoda Wilson, The Exposé, 21st Aug 2024 […]
Have followed Dr Tess Lawrie for three yrs, Dr Mike Yeadon x 4 Yrs, have respect for both. It is healthy to debate, discuss, disagree on science. The problems start whe free speech, research and dialogue stop. I use ivermectin whenever I get covid.it works. I am 74, not worried about infertility and am not worried about any asverse events from ivermectin.
[…] Quelle: Rhoda Wilson, Das Exposé, 21. August 2024 […]
[…] Does ivermectin cause infertility? […]
Do you really think horse breeders and owners would use this if there were a hint of infertility involved?
Hi anon,
That is a very good statement.
Some horses cost a lot of money, well said.
Is the Ivermectin actually killing off the sperm, as they are for all intense purposes … foreign bodies ?!?
Why no follow-up viable fertility investigations after a passage of time?
Toxicology studies are often done at much larger dosages than what a human would get, in order to minimize the number of animals used. It’s not feasible to conduct studies with tens or hundreds of thousands of animals, so they use larger dosages and extrapolate. Plus they apply factors of 10, 100, 1000 or more to take into account variability in the human population. I know this from the water fluoridation issue, so how could Lawrie not know?
Furthermore, those who have been claiming “safe and effective” all this time have had the burden of proof, so why haven’t journalists simply asked them to cite valid scientific evidence to back up their claims?
When Tess Lawrie and Mark Trozzi were challenged to do so last year (on “World Ivermectin Day”) they ignored the challenge entirely (as documented on my substack). No one else managed to cite any either… just as they can’t cite valid evidence of scary “viruses”.
[…] Le Dr Mike Yeadon a déclaré publiquement avec véhémence que « l’ivermectine est l’un des toxiques les plus violents pour la fertilité qu’il ait jamais rencontré » En réponse, le Dr Tess Lawrie a examiné la première étude incluse dans un article que le Dr Yeadon lui a communiqué, pour voir si elle prouvait que l’ivermectine était à l’origine de la stérilité.Source : Rhoda Wilson, The Exposé : Rhoda Wilson, The Exposé, 21 août 2024 […]