|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
For covid vaccines, they could have chosen to use relatively well-known existing technology, but they didn’t. Instead, they used mRNA, an unknown technology with zero safety profile. Why?
To find an answer, Jonathan Engler finds following the money usually gets closer to the truth. “In this regard … before 2020 pharma / biotech was struggling with a dearth of new ideas and many blockbuster products under pressure from pending patent expirations,” he notes.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Design Choices Made for the Injections aka “Covid Vaccines” Point Towards An Agenda Unrelated To Health
I am here reproducing (with some changes) a point I made last year in THIS tweet.
I need to make it clear from the outset that – as stated elsewhere – I don’t believe there was a novel virus causing a pandemic of a novel disease, and thus there was never any justification for any novel treatments or vaccines.
But let’s pretend both these things (neither of which I believe) are true:
- there was a pandemic of a novel virus with a spike protein expressed on its surface1
- getting the body to generate antibodies to that protein is both necessary and desirable for health2
The stated purpose of the mRNA platform is to generate a small bit of that viral protein so that the body’s immune system can develop antibodies against it and fight off infection once the virus is encountered.3
This leads to a serious question which needs to be asked.
The mRNA platform transfects cells throughout the body (since the lipid nanoparticles, LNPs, go everywhere) and generates foreign protein4 in uncontrolled and uncontrollable quantities for an unknown and uncontrollable duration.
Since transfected cells then get destroyed by the body’s immune system, this is inherently dangerous.5
However, there was always a much safer means of priming the body against specific viral proteins.
Protein subunit vaccines – e.g. the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine – have been around for decades. They use yeast cells to make the antigen. Their use involves the injection of a fixed and controlled quantity of the antigen. Much is known about their safety and the “known unknowns” are much less likely to be consequential to safety.
So: why was the mRNA platform selected instead?
They could have made the chosen viral protein using the existing subunit manufacturing technology.
When there was a choice between a relatively well-known technology with a good safety profile and an unknown, complex technology with zero safety profile, they chose the latter.
Everyone will have their pet theories as to the answer to this. For myself, I generally think that following the money usually gets you close to the truth, and in this regard, it is to be noted that before 2020 pharma / biotech was struggling with a dearth of new ideas and many blockbuster products under pressure from pending patent expirations.
But … they had this shiny new platform technology, adaptable (in their eyes) to so many use cases ….
Notes:
- 1 See HERE and HERE.
- 2 Antibodies are not the whole story with respect to immunity, and especially for a respiratory virus they aren’t even more than a tiny fraction of it.
- 3 Once it was clear that whatever “covid” was, these injections didn’t stop the illness, the storyline flipped to “but at least they prevent serious illness.”
- 4 As a result of the frameshift issue, it looks like in fact an admixture of many proteins might be being made, not just “spike.”
- 5 Not to mention the toxicity of the LNPs themselves.
About the Author
Jonathan Engler, MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB, is a British healthcare entrepreneur who is medically and legally qualified. He initially trained in medicine, moving into the pharmaceutical sector where he worked on an international programme for a heart failure drug, designing and analysing clinical trials. He then established a business which became a world leader in using IT to co-ordinate and automate several clinical trial processes. Having sold that business, Jonathan then retrained as a barrister where he worked for a few years before moving back into business.
He is a member of the Health Advisory & Recovery Team (“HART Group”) and publishes articles on a Substack page ‘Jonathan’s Substack’ which you can subscribe to and follow HERE.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
No.
who believes big pharma cares about patents.
The technologies were not only chosen for a reason, they researched peripheral mononucliar blood cells for decades learning how to defeat innate immunity (Quest, GSK, Pierbright, government, etc).
CRISPR was known, in 2015, to be problematic because there is no ‘off switch’, yet it was still used. This is because CRISPR was designed to impart inheritable traits (traits passed down to offspring) and population diffusion.
Ralph Baric’s 2018 coronavirus patent, (9884895B2), even explains how they used picornaviruses (chosen because they travel to the brain, and allow for multiple mRNA proteins to be printed via the IRES):
“The capsid and E glycoprotein genes from Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus are replaced with the Coronavirus Spike Protein gene S.”
None of the decisions made were accidental. People need to be given protection from human patenting. They don’t want you talking about that.
They chose to use them because big pharma is evil. Even IF expiring patents are happening, they use poison all the time to help pad their pockets before they help depopulate!
[…] Are patents nearing expiration the reason why Big Pharma chose to use mRNA technology for covid… […]
It’s manipulated and it’s a “ racket “ same as everything else , starts from a lie then the media and gov. sell it .
The reason for the constant boosters is to top up the Graphene Oxide, to also include any other evil they inject into people.
mRNA is now in dentistry in the injections to freeze the area they work on, also anaesthetics in hospitals.
[…] Are patents nearing expiration the reason why Big Pharma chose to use mRNA technology for covid… […]
That is a possible motive, but I think it’s because it is the WRONG thing to do and the HATE us all and want us to DIE. Evil rules big phama.
It could well be the case that patent expiration dates approaching, panicked pharma into using poorly tested gene therapy instead of the usual vaccine formats.
On the other hand, one has to ask ones self, if that was the case, how come governments and doctors who would in no way suffer from certain medicines no longer being covered by patents; on the contrary everyone would be happy that those drug prices were no longer held high by pharma, but would now cost the countries health services, etc. less money? Yet despite this possible cost saving, governments, health organisations and doctors, lauded these experimental jabs as being safe and effective. Which they have proved to not be.
One has then to ask ones self another two questions.
Why did health ‘experts’ and authorities act in this manner whilst full well knowing the mRNA jabs were not a vaccine, but an experimental gene therapy? How could they say something that is experimental is both safe and effective???
The fourth question one needs to ask ones self, is why on earth would organisations and individual people put in place to take care of the ‘health’ of the general population, so blatantly risk the health and well being of so many people the world over???
Blaming only the pharma industry (and they are to blame) does not go far enough, there were others in positions of great power, who purposefully, or in criminal ignorance, when it was their duty to be properly informed, decided to coerce and/or lie to so many people about a dangerous procedure; they also need to be held responsible for the devastation to so many that their acts have created.