|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
In the last two weeks, the UK government has been making moves to implement digital IDs and tackle “misinformation” and “hate speech” online. The two concepts are not unrelated as demonstrated by two resolutions adopted by a committee of the United Nations last week.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
The following are summaries of articles published by Reclaim the Net over the last ten days, from 23 October to 13 November. You can read the full article by following the hyperlink in the section title.
Table of Contents
Ex-Facebook VP Joins UK Media Regulator Ofcom Sparking Fresh Conflict of Interest Concerns, 6 November 2024
Lord Richard Allan, a former Facebook vice president of public policy, has been appointed as a non-executive director to the Ofcom Board in the UK, sparking concerns about a potential conflict of interest.
Allan was handpicked by Secretary of State for Science, Innovation, and Technology (“DSIT”) Peter Kyle, despite having spent a decade as Facebook’s vice president, raising questions about his ability to regulate the company impartially.
DSIT claims that Allan’s appointment followed an “open process in line with the Governance Code on Appointments.” Still, critics argue that his close ties to Facebook and the technology industry could compromise his objectivity.
Allan’s appointment is not an isolated incident, as the “Big Tech-Big Government revolving door” has seen numerous high-profile figures transition between the public and private sectors, including former UK Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, who is now Meta’s president of global affairs.
Allan has a long history of working in the technology and communications sectors, including stints at the UK’s National Health Service (“NHS”), Cisco and the House of Lords, where he has served as a member for the past 10 years.
Ofcom Chair Lord Michael Grade has defended Allan’s appointment, citing his extensive experience “across technology, telecoms, and media” and his ability to contribute to the development of the regulator’s “strategic direction.”
Allan’s affiliation with the UK’s Liberal Democrats, a party previously led by Nick Clegg, has also raised eyebrows, highlighting the close ties between the technology industry and the government.
Tracking Health or Tracking You? The UK’s Expanding Health Surveillance, 23 October 2024
The UK authorities, led by Health Secretary Wes Streeting, are planning to implement a 10-year-plan to transform the NHS, which includes expanding mass surveillance through digital health initiatives.
The proposed changes include developing a digital health ID, referred to as a “single patient record” on the NHS app, which will contain all information about a patient’s health, and encourage people to monitor their own health at home using devices that track health parameters such as blood pressure and glucose.
The plan aims to move more care from hospitals to the community by giving millions of people smart watches and other wearable tech, including recovering cancer patients, to track their own recovery.
Streeting has also suggested giving obese unemployed persons weight loss drugs to help them get back to work, sparking concerns about the potential misuse of the NHS’s infrastructure and reach.
Phillip Inman, The Observer Economics Editor, has expressed support for mass government surveillance, suggesting that the NHS could be a “testbed for a national ID card” and advocating for the use of satellite surveillance to tax zero-emission vehicles.
Inman has also advised Streeting to ensure that everyone has the NHS app on their phone, arguing that if people share their data with the NHS in the same way they do with Big Tech, health service provision could be cheaper and more effective.
The proposals have raised concerns about the potential for highly invasive monitoring methods and the erosion of privacy, with critics arguing that the NHS is being used as a means to achieve other goals, such as mass surveillance and data harvesting.
The Labour government’s plan to transform the NHS has been met with scepticism, with some arguing that the focus should be on building more hospitals, equipping them better, training and employing more staff, rather than relying on digital health initiatives and mass surveillance.
UK Government Makes Major Digital ID Push, 3 November 2024
The UK government has launched the Office for Digital Identities and Attribute (“OfDIA”), a digital ID watchdog within the Department for Science, Innovation, and Technology, led by chief executive Hannah Rutter.
The OfDIA aims to encourage the growth of the digital ID market, building on the previous Conservative government’s announcement in 2022 to introduce digital ID in the UK.
According to Hannah Rutter, the digital ID system will provide convenience by eliminating the need for a “patchwork of paperwork” from government and private entities, making people’s lives easier and unlocking billions of pounds of economic growth.
The system will not include a government-issued ID card and can be used voluntarily, with users able to choose from a range of digital identity and attribute providers from the private and charity sectors.
The OfDIA has addressed concerns about centralisation by stating that the system will not have a centralised digital database, at least for now.
The Office is working on creating a trusted and secure digital identity market, focusing on five key areas: developing and maintaining the digital identity framework, maintaining a register of accredited organisations, issuing “trust marks” to companies, and international cooperation to ensure interoperability.
Currently, 49 companies meet one of the three criteria for the “trust marks,” which are issued by the OfDIA to accredited organisations.
The ultimate goal of the OfDIA is to provide a secure and convenient digital ID system that benefits both people and the economy.
UK Government To Test Digital ID on Veterans by 2025, Amid Plans for Wider Use, 13 November 2024
The UK Labour government plans to test digital IDs on 250,000 military veterans by 2025 as part of a “Veteran Card” programme, which aims to prove their veteran status and provide faster access to services and support programs.
The programme includes access to health services through the NHS, housing through the Op Fortitude programme, employment opportunities, cheaper public transportation and other discounts.
Critics argue that the digital ID is an attempt to enforce a system that many people do not want and that the government is using veterans as “guinea pigs” to test the system.
Former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair is involved in promoting the digital ID idea, citing the need for “immigration controls” as a reason for its implementation, despite his previous policies contributing to global migration issues.
Labour MP Siobhain McDonagh stated that digital IDs are “inevitably coming” not just for immigration purposes, but also for keeping NHS records, benefit entitlements, and other reasons.
The plan is part of a wider effort to introduce digital IDs to the general population, with the government attempting to normalise the idea despite public concerns and opposition.
UK Government Demands Regulator Create Social Media Overhaul to Curb “Misinformation,” Plans New Censorship Committee by 2025, 24 October 2024
The UK government has requested that the regulator Ofcom (Office of Communications) create a social media overhaul to curb “misinformation,” following the Southport riots earlier in the year.
Secretary of State for Science, Innovation, and Technology Peter Kyle asked Ofcom to assess social platforms’ responses to the riots and their progress in implementing the Online Safety Act.
In response, Ofcom’s Chief Executive Melanie Dawes stated that the regulator wants social networks to change their algorithms to combat “misinformation” and will take tougher action against those that don’t censor information deemed “false” by authorities.
Ofcom is committed to implementing the Online Safety Act “as quickly as possible,” which introduces new legal obligations for social platforms, sharing apps, gaming and messaging services and search engines.
The regulator is setting up an Advisory Committee on Misinformation and Disinformation, which critics see as a “censorship committee,” to start operating early next year.
Ofcom’s assessment of the role of online platforms in the Southport riots found that “illegal content and disinformation” spread quickly online, with a “clear connection between online activity and violent disorder seen on UK streets.”
The regulator expects social platforms to include prohibiting “illegal and hateful” content in their terms of service, take it down swiftly and allow users to easily complain about content.
Platforms will also be required to assess whether changes to their recommendation systems could expose users to “illegal material” and test their systems to ensure they don’t pose additional risks.
Ofcom will take tougher action against platforms that don’t comply with these requirements, with the goal of reducing the spread of “misinformation” online.
UN Wants Digital IDs To Combat “Hate Speech,” “Misinformation”, 7 November 2024
The United Nations’ Fourth Committee (Special Political and Decolonisation) announced on 6 November that it had adopted two resolutions, one of which aims to establish and strengthen partnerships with media to address hate speech narratives through the Department of Global Communications.
The other resolution promotes the UN’s ‘Our Common Agenda’ plan, which includes proposals for bank account-linked digital IDs, the Sustainable Development Goals (“SDGs”), the UN Pact for the Future and the Global Digital Compact, all of which push for digital IDs, censorship and surveillance.
The resolutions have received support from several countries, including Italy, the UK, the EU, El Salvador, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Israel and Malaysia, which have expressed concerns over disinformation and called for the UN to work on countering it.
Italy’s delegate suggested using AI to combat misinformation and disinformation, while the UK’s representative highlighted the country’s commitment to the UN Pact for the Future and Global Digital Compact, as well as its Online Safety Act, which forces companies to remove illegal online content.
Pakistan’s delegate proposed collaborating with Big Tech companies to combat disinformation and warned them not to prioritise profits over joining the “war on disinformation.”
The UN’s Global Principles for Information Integrity were also mentioned as a tool to promote fighting misinformation and hate speech, as well as censoring and demonetising content algorithmically.
However, Argentina’s representative expressed concerns that the term “hate speech” can be abused to stifle pluralistic debate and dissociated himself from paragraphs in the documents referring to hate speech, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Our Common Agenda.
The resolutions and proposals have major countries as key backers, to combat hate speech and misinformation through digital IDs, censorship and surveillance.
Featured image ‘The use of digital ID could add £800 million a year to the UK economy’ taken from ‘Government-backed ‘digital IDs’ to let people open bank accounts’, The Times, 22 July 2024
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News
‘…a digital health ID, referred to as a “single patient record” on the NHS app, which will contain all information about a patient’s health, and encourage people to monitor their own health at home using devices that track health parameters…’
I binned my Apple watch after it had caused a massive vein inflammation in my wrist while constantly worrying me with warnings of dropped pulse. That was years ago and I am still here. Are they reliable or good to play tricks with you? If you constantly monitor your health, you’ll become a hypochondriac, a world of fear to constantly live in, one of the unhealthiest thing ever.
Smart watches? Wow, does it mean the nanotech jabs don’t work well? Why they need more sensors to report about you when you – if you are jabbed – have built-in sensors already? Makes no sense, what’s the real purpose?
I searched for Bluetooth Low Energy Devices with the generic app on my Android and found 14 which were 1 TV and 2 user named and the rest showed as unnamed. Tested with “keuwlsoft BLE Analyzer” and found 25 with 1 TV and 24 unnamed. Then tested with “nRF Connect” and found 37 and all listed as N/A but they had icons of Apple, Google, Samsung and so on. When I expanded each and every one of them all but 3 came up as a specifik brand.
I live in a highrise and my part of the building contain about 20 apartments with at least 36 adults about 10-15 meters from me. In my country the say about 80 percent of the zombie population took the juice. Which means that statistically I should have about 28 juiced-ups in my vicinity. But say only 14 of the was stupid enough it is still 14 and I have then possibly only detected 3 or them. But maybe the only useful thing with this would be to go out in the woods to make certain I myself are not emitting anything. With the rest of it I wonder how much is true or pure BS.
Yeah, don’t ask any questions of your own and do not check things out for yourself.
But I described exactly what I did so even a mentally lazy person with an Android phone can replicate it. Then try to muster some strength to interpret their findings and write a comment of their own since it would be a bit more beneficial for the topic.
Some people may emit multiple MAC addresses. A very polluted unvaxxed person let’s say.
Sure, anything is possible. My point with the initial comment was that I didn’t see for myself what I have been told should be there. And if they have multiple MAC addresses I would have seen even more weird MACs. But I did not see this.
I’m not saying my little test showed it all but it raises more questions than it answered. So everyone else have a possibility to do a simple test of their own to see how it adds up.
They try to disguise these, I’ll show you. Nothing can identify these properly but for first look it looks (nowadays only!) they belong to an Apple (but Android). Probably too many became aware and this is a way to calm them down.
But if I would do an Internet checkup of say those 37 N/A MACs I detected. And if some of my presumed cattle tagged neighbors really are disguised as Apple tags. Would I then get the same result as you got? I mean if they could make an Android app not show valid results so why should one of their sites be more correct.
That Andorid App shows valid result, it is just in the description (you have to push an extra button for see that) when they try to disguise this unidentified MACs with fake explanations.
As about the sites for MAC identification, they are basic troubleshooting sites for IT guys, it would be very ugly if they would not be reliable and no one would use them.
Back then it took me ages to find out how to see these, because neither the IPhone nor the new Android phone showed this. A guy here wrote what to use – like old Android op systems or Bluetooth Scanner – I downloaded mine from the Google Play ‘shop’ via the phone, it was the first hit and the name is simply Bluetooth Scanner no other words.
I tested mainly on flights, because the phones there are in flight mode and there is a range 20-30m, people don’t keep the bluetooth on or just some because it eats the battery fast. Furthermore the couple of phones, tablets, watches – whatever – were identified properly. It was like out of 70 MACs there were 5-8 identified, and the rest unidentified.
It’s not the phone who identifies, the devices send messages to the rest of devices around that ‘I am here, this is who I am, do you want to pair with me’? Which makes sense, as this is how your computer can find your newest bluetooth mouse.
Those sites on the net, they can even cope with stuff like the ticket machine in a Croatian tourist train or a very rare printer or a very rare mobile from Thailand (tested).
There were videos from empty cemeteries, MACs popping up from the freshly buried. There was an experiment by some French guys who mixed fresh blood in a vial with Pfizer and after 90 minutes the MAC appeared.
At 23 minutes.
https://rumble.com/v43eig2-documentary-next-dose-iii-do-we-still-need-more-proof.html?e9s=src_v1_upp
Tomorrow I’m going to buy the regular “Asus USB-BT500” adapter which should be LE capable since it is running v 5.0. I found the Linux “toolBLEx” BLE scanner and analyze software, which also has a Win version. Then I am going to do a new test on my computer at night since it’s better when many user operated devices are turned off. Don’t like to work on my little phone and I will only use it for cross reference. I will then check all named and unnamed MACs I find on a couple of different check-up sites.
I have seen a couple of “signal from the grave” videos and this is my next project depending on how my first one goes. In my town there are a couple of larger cemeteries the size of some square kilometers. I will then see if I can find some fresh graves to measure. If I get a signal I will walk in four different directions from where the signal is strongest and see if the actual signal diminishes by distance. A possible signal will be stationary and at night it will be no other disturbance from the living. So if I should get one or more signals under these circumstances it would definitely confirm the broadcasting theory.
I partly read up a little on the capabilities of BLE and there are some devices which can send up to one kilometer. But a longer distance will have a negative impact on both throughput and signal strength. The programmable dongle I mentioned a couple of comments below is also a bit restricted compared to the more advance ones, but they cost 10-20K and up. I am only interested in this thing since it is something I can check up for myself. But it’s not my problem if they really are cattle tagged since they lined up for it.
I just came to think of “Kali Linux” the pen-test OS which can run from a USB-stick. I looked at it’s Bluetooth tool list and it had a couple of different scanners and a lot else which might come in handy.
I bought the Asus adapter and with Linux generic Bluetooth app I could see 15 unnamed devices MAC. That’s about what i saw on Androids generic app. But the software only showed them wile scanning and then they disappeared, so I had to screenshot them.
I checked their MACs on two different sites were maclookup dot app was the more detailed one. Since it showed if the MAC was an Universally Administered Address (UAA) uniquely assigned by manufacturer or a Locally Administered Address (LAA) assigned by device user, overriding the burned-in address.
Of the 15 I checked 4 was identified with 3 Apple Inc and one Android TV by Vestel Elektronik. From the 11 unknown 7 was with LAA MAC set by user and 4 UAA with unknown burned in MAC. So I could have 4 juiced-ups broadcasting in my vicinity or neighbors found of cheap no name China stuff.
I’m going to test with the BT toolbox on Kali Linux since it have dedicated BLE tools. And these software are harder to tamper with since they are being used by hackers and they would notice a tampering since they are quite computer-wise.
But from the looks of it it’s probably also includes a graveyard shift at a cemetery since a positive signal from some fresh grave would be more conclusive.
My Linux distribution had the toolBLEx software in it’s repositories as an one click downloadable Flatpack container with all dependencies.
Bluetooth advertise on 3 channels and most chip can only scan one of them at the time so it alternates between the 3 which makes a long scan better.
I did about a 3-4 hour continuous scan at night and detected 415 devices and it was still detecting when I ended the scan. And I have a lot of concrete walls all around.
The thing with Locally Administered Addresses (LAA), which many have been so far, is that they are set by the administrator and overrides the burnt in. If the juice-ups are constantly changing MAC this behavior could look like LAA since it is controlled by the administrator of the juice.
I have only checked up 61 of the unknown MACs on maclookup dot app. And 9 came up with a specific brand name, 32 as LAA set by administrator and 20 was unknown UAA with burned in MAC.
As with Android the detection rate differed a lot between apps. The best detection rate I got was with nRF connect and nRF ToolBox from Nordic Semiconductor. And this is the same company which makes the programmable dongle that is ment to work with their software. One can also put an Android phone in developer mode and use it’s generic BT app after some changes in developer options.
But to make a long story short. I definitely don’t see anything disproving the broadcasting thing so far.
Allegedly Apple Watch but its MAC is unknown, can’t be identified.
Very difficult to tell. Allegedly the jabbed ended up with many sensors and many everything – self assembling parts – but what controls these and how it is unknown.
One more thing is known, that these MACs are dynamic, changing.
I think probably the first warning coming from Mic Andersen was the most reliable, that listed the sources of invented stuff, solutions, etc to support their findings.
If you not remember….
https://www.brighteon.com/470607bc-7d99-4d87-9f97-3dc7a9a564a4
The brand name means nothing. Just recently it was as if they would have tried to disguise these. For example, an unidentifiable MAC but with some words in the description, if one requested details it was as if an operation system belonging to Apple.
MAC is a protocol and no one exempt, these MACs should be identified at least via the help of internet and websites designed to it.
Can you pls recall, those which were unidentified or had only a brand name, what was the first tag of the MACs? MACs coming from people here start with 4 or 5, 6, 7, rarely 1 and as far as we know they refer back to the type of the jab.
True and not BS, back then we tested, we did because the truth was so terrifying we didn’t want to believe. At the beginning only old Androids saw these, they were filtered out on new and on IPhones. Old Androids show these as either tons of ‘MISC’ or with proper MACs and they couldn’t be identified.
I rarely check nowadays, If I do I use a newer Andorid with Bluetooth Scanner.
A Spanish doc tested it on his patients, he wrote, 78% of the people had MAC among those who said they got the jab, and 0 among those who said they didn’t get it.
‘…Of the 137 patients questioned, 112 said they had been vaccinated, and 25 said they hadn’t been vaccinated. None of the patients who said they hadn’t been vaccinated registered on my cell phone any device available for Bluetooth connection, having ensured the disconnection of their cell phone, if they had one. In 96 patients of the 112 who said they had been vaccinated, 96 of the 112 having switched off their electronic devices if they were carrying them, a MAC code remained on the screen of my cell phone, …’
https://www.orwell.city/2021/11/MAC.html
I have read and seen most of the things you bring up even if I don’t remember every single detail of them. But it is always better to try to confirm things for yourself when it’s possible. Since much of Alt Media is a rerun of MSN with a twist to fit it’s distrustful audience.
How old Android devices are we talking about? I have a ten year old E-ink device with Android but I don’t know how compatible it is with all apps. What app did you use to see weird MACs on the older devices?
I did not write down the 3 unknown devices but the app must have some offline list of manufacturers since it identified all the other. I will recheck it later. I did a Internet checkup of other MACs I found on a site where the person said to have done the same thing I did. Most of them came back as unknown devices. But I would like to check my own surroundings for my self.
And for me all this is not a biggie since I will not be a broadcaster. But this is a place where we can have all sorts of diskussions, even the ones we don’t really like.
Android op system 6 and 7 what we tried. You just switched on Bluetooth and Available Devices and it searched. On newer Androids you need the extra (free) application downloaded called Bluetooth Scanner. It is the Bluetooth scanner which nowadays can’t identify these MACs but if you ask for details it will give fake identifications, guesses like I showed on the photo. No way that an Apple device (watch or phone) have no identifiable MAC.
It is a customized Android 6 I think on the E-ink tablett but the chip is probably to old to be BLE capable. I only saw four TVs and one of them was nameless so I had to look it up.
When I think about it I remember the old vs new Android problem of detection. But I have only had my pocket book sized phone for six months and never use it more than to do some occasional Internet payments.
I couldn’t find the exact advanced USB dongle I mentioned before. But you probably know I mean them bigger BLE circuit board looking ones. Wouldn’t it be easier with one of those and a more advanced computer software? A laptop is more capable than a phone and quite easy to set up in some public arena. I they have not crippled the computer software too.
Which of one of the Bluetooth scanners do you mean? There are 6-7 of them with Bluetooth and scanner in the name.
Sorry for asking a silly question, but do you need a smart phone to detect a Mac address? I don’t have one.
Yes, if you don’t have Bluetooth, you can’t test. Old tablet with Android? Laptops filtering out the not identifiable stuff, operation system dependent.
Just replied to Benton on this-Thanks.
No, You can buy a Bluetooth USB dongle to the computer if it doesn’t have one. But it must be Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) capable if you want to see walking broadcasters.
I was looking at a bit more advanced BLE USB dongle with a better software than on Android. Shall se if I can find the bookmark for it. I’ll be back…
Are they reliable? As far as I know the Bluetooth dongle just gives the data but the operating system is the one to process and display data. Newer operating systems might filtering out these?
I was initially looking at something like this and not the generic Windows application to go with a more advance BLE dongle.
Acrylic Bluetooth LE Analyzerhttps://www.acrylicwifi.com/en/bluetooth-analyzer/I mostly use Linux since both their software and operating system are less restricted than Win. But I have not dived into what software they have or don’t.
https://www.acrylicwifi.com/en/bluetooth-analyzer/
This conversation jigged my memory!
I still have my 20 y-o Blackberry 8320 SMART PHONE!
This is a Bluetooth device (though I didn’t use the Bluetooth function back then), and I recall it detecting wi-fi hotspots and such when I lived in the Cotswold’s. I never got on with the thing-hated it, only used it for about 6 months-reverting back to my trusty old Nokia 6310i which I still use on the rare occasion I go out!
I’ll leave it on charge overnight and see what happens!
Thanks.
You can try and see. But BLE was integrated into Bluetooth 4.0 in December 2009. So if it’s twenty years old it might not work since BLE is not compatible with older versions of Bluetooth. Like my tablet and it’s only ten.
A small fingernail sized USB dongle costs about 20-30 £ and you have to check up what it’s capable of. But I don’t think the Bluetooth chip in many smartphones are either better or more expensive.
If an app or software are possibly unreliable one you crosscheck on one or several other MAC checkers on Internet. I’m going to check those 37 I found to see if I can find something weird.
So we can continue this off topic discussion under some other totally unrelated article with the blessing of Rhoda.
@FedUP
I remembered incorrectly. I myself was looking for an ordinary Linux compatible BLE adapter and they are fewer and a little bit more expensive. If you are only going to use it with Windows they are cheaper. You could probably find one on Amazon for about 7-12 GBP and up and some are probably good enough for a scan. But as FedUp mentioned the OS itself and BLE software could maybe be some weak spots. Don’t know since I haven’t tried any of them.
There are a couple of opens software projects that have BLE capability like e.g. Wireshark and so on. But being able to use more advanced features you probably need a dito adapter and the ordinary ones ain’t that.
I found one of those programmable adapters and it only costs about the double of an ordinary one. Don’t remember if I looked at a similar one or it’s predecessor but it doesn’t matter since they all are more versatile than a regular one.
The adapter is “NRF52840-DONGLE” from Nordic Semiconductor and it’s basic price is £8.22 on British Mouser. It’s the same company that made the “nRF Connect” Android app that had the best detection rate of the ones I tried. They have a multiplattform software which is developed to work with their hardware. Where one can scan, program and do a lot of other stuff that is probably overkill for both of us. But it is better to have extra capabilities you don’t need than not having them if you really need them.
If the walking zombie broadcaster thing is one hundred percent correct this could be a little handy tool. Since we probably then will see more transmitters in the future. But I don’t take any responsibility for any of your purchases since I only wrote this for educational purpose from my own limited viewpoint.
You will find dongle, software and a list of resellers on their website.
https://www.nordicsemi.com/Products/Development-hardware/nRF52840-Dongle
Yes, got rid of my smartwatch after it started giving me arthritis in my wrist. Not to mention the tracking of metrics. Uck that shit.
That’s what the NHS (National Hit Sqad)are all about- creating hypochondriacs, and pushing fear on us all. The Bible says “fear hath torment” doesn’t it just!? Our local NHS hospital’s slogan is “Don’t get scared, get checked” . And boy, don’t they push it!
What the poor unenlightened soul doesn’t realise is that it is the NHS dishing out the death, diseases and harm through their dumbed down staff(or otherwise?) via Big Pharma’s poison.
Acronym for FEAR, FALSE EXPECTATIONS APPEARING REAL.
This is good. 🙂
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vYyQAAKBtAk
.
Streeting has also suggested giving obese unemployed persons weight loss drugs to help them get back to work
to get them killed off more like! please exercise and heat healthily instead of taking the ‘quick fix’
Many can’t work because of EMF hypersensitivity, even if they are not aware of the cause of their symptoms, I am one of them. No losing weight or sporting will help on that. It is like too many x-rays, the effect / harm accumulates.
They say, it is all in your head, etc, just how the jab-ridden people illnesses are while there is a clinic in the US recognizing and testing it since 1990. But as it would go against their planned tyranny dependent on connectivity and smart stuff, antennas, they never ever would admit it, while there will be more and more people – when they reach that point of poisoning they can’t tolerate it anymore.
[…] Fostul vicepreședinte Facebook se alătură autorității de reglementare a presei din Marea Britan… […]
Yesterday they started to implement a new one medical journal system in my country. And they have also been talking about smart watches and heart monitors and all other beneficial possibilities to monitor us.
About the Internet hate speech thing. They can already see from which computer their imagen hate comes from since almost every browser gives of an unique fingerprint in the things it revels even behind a VPN.
It’s one thing to use digital ID to do a specifik task like your tax theft or bank payment and then logg out. But if they manage to implement this digital ID as a requirement to log onto Internet at all. Then we are totally toast since the can deny us access to Internet by revoking the ID.
I’ve seen what they been doing in my country with the digital ID issued by banks. A couple of owners of Alt Media sites have had their bank accounts terminated which revokes their digital ID. The same have happened to some vocal free thinkers and the presumed “authorities” have not done anything since the banks are doing their bidding.
That is forked-up, dude. Move to Florida. We outlawed it. And we have powerful weapons too. The would be ill advised to implement such policies here, Florida Man won’t stand for it.
We live in a “democracy” as they say and I wonder how it will be when the veil comes off.
I forgot, The medical journal system is called Millennium and is created by the American company Cerner in the late nineties.
[…] Ex-Facebook VP Joins UK Media Regulator Ofcom Sparking Fresh Conflict of Interest Concerns, 6 Novemb… […]
[…] Ex-Facebook VP Joins UK Media Regulator Ofcom Sparking Fresh Conflict of Interest Concerns, 6 Novemb… […]
On rightspeak will be allowed, or you will be vaporized.
The vax is safe and effective.
Diversity is strength.
You can be any sex you want.
Russia is Hitler, or Putin, or Putler.
By the way, if you would think it is for your security, forget about it. They try to infiltrate the buying-selling system. There are limits of certain kind of advertisements that what you can advertise and how many and how often. You won’t be able to sell your second car in the same year you sold the first, or your gold if you have any, etc etc. Or you won’t be able to buy things because you reached your quota.
How was it? No one will sell or buy without the mark of the beast..?
They do it step by step. Like the self-checkout, nowadays even without the possibility of using cash. Just call out the cashier…
https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/R0lPWGlwPvk Dose of reality
[…] Ex-Facebook VP Rejoint UK Media Regulator Ofcom Sparking Fresh Conflict of Interest Concerns, 6 nove… […]
[…] Original Article: The Exposé […]
Before all you the Vaxxed Brits in the military die off from self inflicted cultural suicide, would you kindly deep six all your Nukes and destroy your nuke facilities before the grinning Muslims take over your betrayed land? Thank You!
Sorry, no entrance to Valhalla, a Vaxx needle is not a sword!
The U.K. government is just another puppet of the U.N. the whole thing needs to have a reset.
“Join the army and jump the queues. Push everyone else aside. Get the houses, get the “healthcare”, force everyone else to subsidise your food and power.”