Alexander Dugin views the dismantling of USAID as a significant blow to globalism. He says it is comparable to the Soviet Union’s abolition of the Communist International (“Comintern”), an international organisation to promote world communism (1919-1943), and Cominform, a coordination body of Marxist-Leninist communist parties in Europe (1947-1956).

USAID was the primary structure for implementing globalist projects and was closely integrated with the CIA, Dugin writes.  The dismantling of the agency by Donald Trump and Elon Musk will cut off funding for globalist networks and subversive activities, dealing a significant blow to the rules-based international order, also known as the one world governance system.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Are You a Human? 1 + 1 =

---

USAID Destroyed: Trump and Musk’s Conservative Revolution Continues

By Alexander Dugin

[Note from The Exposé:  We have added the hyperlinks to Dugin’s text.]

The liquidation of the United States Agency for International Development (“USAID”) is an event whose significance can hardly be overstated. When the Soviet Union abolished the Comintern (Third International) and later the Cominform, structures that advocated the ideological interests of the USSR on a global scale, it marked the beginning of the end for the international Soviet system. Although the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (COMECON) and the Warsaw Pact Organisation existed until 1991, their demise was essentially predetermined during Khrushchev’s time.

Something similar is happening today in America, as USAID was the main operational structure for the implementation of globalist projects. Essentially, it was the primary transmission belt for globalism as an ideology aimed at the worldwide imposition of liberal democracy, market economics and human rights, while dismantling sovereign states and overthrowing regimes capable of resisting this on a global scale.

Through this agency, globalism was embedded in various countries. That is why USAID was financed with a substantial portion of the US federal budget: about 1% – amounting to $50 billion annually. When you factor in subsidies from other globalist structures, this figure at least doubles. Thus, approximately 2% of the American treasury was spent on this agency each year. One can only imagine the material resources this organisation possessed. Additionally, it was closely integrated with a certain segment of the Central Intelligence Agency (most USAID branches worldwide served as cover for CIA activities, into which globalist ideas were actively embedded).

After sweeping out the previous US political leadership – super-globalists – Donald Trump began purging the CIA of representatives from this globalist structure. The banning of USAID is a critical, fundamental move, the importance of which, as I said, cannot be overstated. This is especially true because countries like Ukraine largely depend on this agency, receiving significant funding through it. All Ukrainian media, non-governmental organisations (“NGOs”), and ideological structures were financed by USAID. The same applies to almost the entire liberal opposition in the post-Soviet space, as well as liberal regimes in various countries, including Maia Sandu’s Moldovan administration and many European political regimes, which were also on USAID’s payroll.

And suddenly, all of this collapses. Sure, some committed liberals will continue their activities out of ideological conviction, but they are a very small percentage. The vast majority of liberalism and global liberal networks operate on the principle of “money for loyalty.” But whose money funds this liberal “loyalty”? It is USAID’s money. Therefore, without USAID – and given that Elon Musk has called it a “criminal organisation responsible for deaths” – this funding for subversive activities will cease. This, in turn, is a blow to the entire global liberal environment. Essentially, it is a missile strike on the headquarters of globalism. And Trump and Musk made it happen.

The consequences, in my view, will be profoundly felt in all countries. We will suddenly realise that this oppressive pressure on our Russian society is coming to an end. It is no secret that USAID helped draft Yeltsin’s Constitution in 1993, through which it controlled Russia. Before that, it played a role in the collapse of the Soviet Union, laying the foundation for the creation of the Russian Federation, which was initially intended to be part of the global world under the direct control of USAID and the globalist elites.

Vladimir Putin began resisting this external control as soon as he came to power in 2000, focusing on strengthening sovereignty. However, USAID operated in Russia until 2012. It was only when Putin assumed his third presidential term that USAID was officially banned from Russia. Indirectly, of course, it continued to exert influence, as much of the political opposition and many representatives of the so-called “sixth column” remained closely tied to it. Only now is this coming to an end.

I must admit, this news is so significant that it is hard to comprehend. Until recently, we believed that globalists were a permanent fixture, that USAID was an almost eternal structure, and that the US would always be the vanguard of globalisation. We thought nothing could be done, and no one could change this. But it turns out that it can be changed – and it already has been.

(Translated from the Russian)

About the Author

Alexander or Aleksandr Dugin has a Doctorate in Sociology and Political Sciences and a PhD in Philosophy. He is one of the best-known writers and political commentators in post-Soviet Russia. In addition to the many books he has authored on political, philosophical and spiritual topics, he is the founder of the Russian geopolitical school and Eurasian Movement.

Wikispooks notes that Dugin is one of the most popular ideologists of the creation of a Eurasian empire that would be opposed to “North Atlantic interests.” And he has had close ties to the Kremlin and Russian military.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Are You a Human? 3 + 4 =

---

Note: What Does Liberal Mean?

Dugin uses the word “liberal” in various contexts for example: liberal democracy, liberal regimes, committed liberals and global liberal networks.  So, we thought it appropriate to remind ourselves what all these terms mean.

The word “liberal” in simple terms means “free” but it is one of the most abused words in the English language.  Liberal has different meanings depending on which country you are in, what your politics are and in what context it is being used.  To some, “liberal” refers to the political left and others, the political right. Other contradictions relate to governance: “liberal” is used to describe national forms of governance and also nations’ nemesis – the Globalists’ one world governance system.

While in North America “liberal” is used to refer to the political left and in Australia “liberal” refers to the political right, in Russia the word “liberal” has a complex and often contradictory meaning.  Russians may use “liberal” to describe someone who is perceived as pro-Western, naive and supportive of democratic reforms but also potentially disloyal to Russia.  In the context of Russian politics, liberalism is often associated with opposition to the current government and a desire for greater democratic freedoms and human rights. So, the meaning of liberalism in Russia can vary widely depending on the context and the person using the word.

Concerning forms of national governance, a liberal democracy is based on liberal political ideology which emphasises individual autonomy, equality of opportunity and the protection of individual rights, such as the right to life, liberty and property.  Liberal democracy is characterised by elections between multiple distinct political parties, a separation of powers into different branches of government, the rule of law in everyday life as part of an open society, a market economy with private property and the equal protection of human rights, civil rights, civil liberties and political freedoms for all people.

Then there is the supranational liberal world order which is also known as the liberal international order (“LIO”), the rules-based order (“RBO”), the rules-based international order (“RBIO”), the new world order and one world governance.  It is a set of global, rule-based, structured relationships based on political liberalism, economic liberalism and liberal internationalism (globalism) that emerged, established largely by the United States, in the aftermath of World War II.  It emphasises international cooperation through global institutions such as the United Nations (“UN”), World Trade Organisation and International Monetary Fund.  However, as we have witnessed, even if it was not the intention at the start, international cooperation easily turns into global control by oligarchs who control the global institutions.

Further reading:

• Matthew Ehret: Canada, United States, British Empire and a New World Order
• Ukraine: NATO and US’s aim is to destroy the Russian military
• Council on Foreign Relations tries to combat rise of anti-globalisation
• The New World Order is real: The battle is for our minds

The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…

Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?

Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.

The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.

Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.

Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Daily Digest

US News Posts

UK News Posts

World News Posts

All News Posts

Are You a Human? 9 + 5 =

Shares in the UK’s biggest banks have tumbled

The trillion-dollar biotech industry is facing failure – and it’s because of covid injections

Technocracy Roundtable: What is Technocracy?

The Shakespeare Deception Part 2

Rhoda Wilson

While previously it was a hobby culminating in writing articles for Wikipedia (until things made a drastic and undeniable turn in 2020) and a few books for private consumption, since March 2020 I have become a full-time researcher and writer in reaction to the global takeover that came into full view with the introduction of covid-19. For most of my life, I have tried to raise awareness that a small group of people planned to take over the world for their own benefit. There was no way I was going to sit back quietly and simply let them do it once they made their final move.

See Full Bio