|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The UK government’s political project, to reach Net Zero by 2050, was adopted without democratic consent in 2019.
There is no scientific basis for significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions as their effect on climate is limited.
Climate models are poorly designed and based on faulty data, including issues with weather station placements and adjustments that can misrepresent temperature trends.
The UK’s Net Zero initiative is misguided and detrimental, impacting agriculture, energy supply and the economy without contributing to climate improvement.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
This month’s Light Paper delves into the NHS systemic involuntary deaths (also known as the midazolam murders) in 2020, which could have killed as many as 55,000 people, the looming digital identity, the hidden science of “fossil fuels” being produced by organic matter, health alert about water fluoridation and more.
Below is The Light‘s article about net zero written by Mike Simpson, who has a PhD in physical chemistry.
Net Zero: A Pointless Crusade
By Dr. Mike Simpson
The political project, UK Net Zero by 2050, was undemocratically adopted by the UK government in 2019. Yet the science of so-called greenhouse gases is well known and there is no reason to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) or nitrous oxide (N2O) because of radiation absorption rates.
Adding to or removing these naturally occurring gases from the atmosphere will make little difference to the temperature or the climate. Water vapour (H2O) is claimed to be a much stronger greenhouse gas than CO2, CH4 or N2O but cannot be regulated because it occurs naturally in vast quantities.
Because of the nature of absorption of infrared radiation, most of the temperature change has already occurred and increasing CO2, CH4 or N2O concentrations will not lead to significant changes in air temperatures. This is because absorption is logarithmic (Beer-Lambert Law of attenuation) – a law of diminishing returns.
And there are many other variables which affect temperatures. The ocean is a huge heat sink (carrying heat away from the source) which moderates the global surface air temperature and absorbs CO2 (Henry’s Law).
Cloud cover can have significant effects on air temperatures and provide negative feedback in the climate system, stabilising the temperature to some extent. And changes in the sun and solar radiation can have significant effects.
All of this science has been empirically derived, either in the laboratory (e.g. Henry’s Law, Beer-Lambert Law of attenuation), observed in reliable proxies (solar cycles) or by direct observation (e.g. changes in the sun, changes in sunspots or changes in solar “wind” radiation).
These and many other influences on the surface air temperature of the Earth are not captured by the climate modellers and so, faulty, inaccurate models are produced which provide projections (not forecasts) far into the future where uncertainties are huge.
However, if the models are so poorly designed, the output is not likely to be able to predict anything realistic.
The real problem is that the data for these faulty models also suffers from poor quality, unjustified data adjustments, infilling missing data to make the data fit the theory, and merging of known poor quality weather station data with good quality data.
Tampering with data is fraudulent and the known bad data should have been excluded, but this is apparently routinely used in climatology and raises questions from scientists with concerns about the climate change narrative.
For example, some 96 per cent of US weather stations were found to be incorrectly or poorly sited (e.g. near artificial sources of heat such as air conditioning outlets, on concrete pads, close to buildings or car parks in urban heat islands) leading to artificial increases in measured temperatures.
Loss of Russian weather stations from the data set, instrument changes, relocation of weather stations, population growth and land-use changes artificially increased calculated global average surface-air temperatures. These are basic mistakes in data collection, data handling and data analysis, and they are misleading.
Yet most of our politicians seem unable to grasp these important basic scientific facts and simply concentrate on very expensive, unreliable, variable and intermittent so-called renewables and the non-existent hydrogen energy system by spending £22bn on carbon capture and storage. Is this the hole in the finances Labour spoke about?
Net Zero is a pointless crusade which will achieve nothing for the climate but gives the government an excuse to harm our farmers, damage our electrical supply system and hike our energy bills, hurting us all.
It is time for a rethink on Net Zero because the science does not support it in any way.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News
“Bad data and faulty models” = Symptoms.Root cause is the biggest lie in human history.
I’d like to see you or anyone else try to “defend” themself against the regime for, say, refusing to pay “council tax” (50% of which is for the guards for the rich – the “police”).
As for all the names linked to this or that, why go on about it if you’re never going to do anything about it? Here’s one linking trump to you know who, so rhoda will likely nuke it to protect her own:
https://fitzinfo.net/2025/03/16/trump-controlled-by-kgb-mossad-part-vii/
Hi Touncil Cax, Why did you have have to end what appeared to be a reasonable comment with a personal jibe at me. Are you trying to find a “clever” way to troll me?
PS If you troll me or The Expose I, or someone else, will “nuke” your profile as you have suggested.
HUGE LIES! Look it up! CO2 is REQUIRED for ALL life on earth as we know it! Without photosynthesis there can be NO food for plants or animals. It also provides the oxygen in our atmosphere. Without CO2 in our atmosphere, we will all die! Did you all sleep through grade school science where they showed this, and that we breathe out CO2 and plants breathe it IN to release CO2 and make food for us? Look this up so you will KNOW who is lying to you.
Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version
https://youtu.be/zmfRG8-RHEI