|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Phase Two of New Zealand’s Royal Commission on covid is at risk of failing the public due to its approach to vaccine safety, ignoring evidence of serious adverse effects and relying on discredited ideas.
During the week of 7 to 11 July, the Commission held a series of hearings and “heard from a range of organisations and individuals who experienced the pandemic and the Government’s response to it.”
Before Phase Two began, the Commission was briefed by Voices for Freedom, the Health Forum NZ and New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out on Science. But it chose to undermine their concerns and instead cite myths about mRNA “vaccine” safety.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
The Royal Commission on Covid-19 Phase Two is in Danger of Failing the Public
By Dr. Guy Hatchard, 18 July 2025
A group of scientists in Japan has released an analysis of 21 million vaccine and health records which provides evidence that up to 610,000 people died in Japan (0.5% of the population or 1 in 200) unexpectedly after the covid-19 injections, with a peak death rate occurring after 90-120 days. The time interval to the death peaks shortened if you received boosters. This massive effect size was missed until now because few among the medical community believed that deaths occurring 3 to 4 months after the shot could be related to the vaccine. The analysis of official data puts this fallacy to rest. Covid-19 vaccines have prolonged serious adverse effects.
It is disturbing data like this that has had us, up until now, clinging to hope that the Royal Commission would initiate a rational discussion about covid vaccination safety, but this hope was dashed when public hearings last week before the New Zealand Covid Commission revealed a profoundly different narrative.
Reportedly, the Royal Commission on covid vaccine safety Phase Two had previously received about 12 hours of private briefings by Voices for Freedom (“VFF”), the New Zealand Health Forum and New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out on Science (“NZDSOS”) during the last two months. These briefings were conducted in a cordial atmosphere and accompanied by detailed written submissions with references to official data sets and thousands of scientific papers, published in reputable journals, raising safety concerns. The briefings included presentations by recognised experts in epidemiology, health and biotechnology safety.
So, we had reason for optimism. But despite this, at the public hearings last week, the Commission and its counsels came out swinging, determined to undermine the credibility of concerns raised about mRNA vaccine safety. In doing so, they cited discredited ideas, clung to the myth of covid mRNA vaccine safety and revealed the disturbing reality that they had not taken the time to properly review the submitted evidence and research. Apparently, an old proverb applies: a leopard cannot change its spots.
The myths being entertained by the Commission included the following.
1. You cannot hold government officials responsible if they are acting on “expert” advice.
In fact, governments have a duty to investigate the reliability of any advice they receive. During the pandemic, there were many well-credentialed scientists both here and overseas warning of the need for caution or offering alternatives. The government shut these down and initiated a one-size-fits-all “safe and effective” narrative along with draconian vaccine mandates. From this, it is clear that they must bear a significant responsibility for their actions.
2. Whilst many people have suffered unusual reactions, including deaths, you cannot prove the mRNA vaccine was causal. Adverse effects might just be the result of covid infection or something else we don’t know about.
This is a very naive misinterpretation of the science of causality. Statistical techniques like time series analysis of the data sets for covid incidence, vaccination status and health outcomes can rapidly identify causality to near certainty. Our government has withheld health and vaccination data from public view or independent scientific scrutiny, even going to the extent of gagging and prosecuting Health New Zealand whistle-blower Barry Young. However, complete overseas health datasets publicly released in countries like Japan and Korea have proved covid vaccination beyond doubt as the most significant factor causing or complicating the rise in a broad range of conditions, including autoimmune and neurological, cancer, cardiac and mental diseases.
3. Covid vaccines are sufficiently similar to traditional vaccines to ensure we can rely on their general safety and efficacy. Therefore, there is no known mechanism for long-term effects on a broad range of health conditions.
The immune system carries out trillions of protective actions in trillions of cells every day to support health. Covid vaccines are the first ever vaccines to penetrate the cell wall to edit and repurpose the genetic control of human immune responses. Editing genetic functions is inherently mutative and its capacity to create unforeseen health consequences is recognised in pre-covid scientific literature, where, for example, a 2019 review reports:
“…gene therapy has been caught in a vicious cycle for nearly two decades owing to immune response, insertional mutagenesis, viral tropism, off-target activity, unwanted clinical outcomes (ranging from illness to death of participants in clinical trials), and patchy regulations.”
Covid mRNA vaccines generate toxic spike proteins, which have been detected throughout human physiology even many months after vaccination. Evidence of IgG4 modulated immune suppression following covid vaccination has been verified by numerous studies pointing to a mechanism for long-term appearance of disease including cancers.
4. The Commission remit does not allow for or fund an assessment of the results of published scientific research. Therefore, it is relying on “expert” testimony.
In essence, this limitation is anti-science. It fails to recognise that many “experts” have conflicts of interest. They may want to ensure that their actions during the pandemic are not called into question. They may want to ensure that sources of funding for biotechnology do not dry up. Government pandemic policy was built on so-called expert advice, much of which has since been disproved by published research. Science proceeds on data. Analysis of data is published in journal papers, which are subject to scientific and public scrutiny. If the Commission is not funded or prepared to evaluate the testimony they receive with reference to published data and research, then we will be left with a situation that is not materially different from that of the last five years. In other words, experts will be allowed to bear false witness before the Commission without any possibility of them being challenged as to veracity or supporting evidence.
This week, one expert witness told the Commission that covid vaccines remain at or close to the injection site. A contention that has been proven false by research. The counsel for the Commission did not challenge this, precisely because they have decided not to closely investigate published research. This exposes an absolutely fundamental weakness in the Commission process.
As you probably know, articles we publish at the Hatchard Report contain links to numerous scientific papers supporting our arguments, as does this one. It is notable that during the pandemic and subsequently, the government has referenced little by way of published research. On the rare occasions it did so, it selected articles that were often out of date and not representative of the broader scientific debate evident in journals. We had been hopeful that the Commission would recognise this as a key deficiency of government policy formation. Instead, there was something frighteningly surreal about the public hearings. Echoing Margaret Thatcher’s 1980 speech: “We are not for turning,” the Commission appeared to be a captain ready to go down with his sinking ship.
Taken as a whole, the Commission’s positions, which we watched unfold live last week, appear to amount to a pre-determined and completely inadequate outcome. If we are to get a result that satisfies the requirement for transparency, the Commission should actually be demanding the public release of New Zealand health data sufficient to enable comparative time series analysis of vaccination status, health outcomes and deaths. Without this and a genuine dive into overseas published research findings, we will be left with more of the same tired old excuses and cover-ups. Moreover, we will remain unprotected from a repeat performance in the near future. There have been 7,500 excess deaths in New Zealand since 2020 and the trend is continuing; the public deserves real answers.
The Hatchard Report has requested an opportunity to meet with the Commission on behalf of our many thousands of readers and subscribers, but received no reply.
About the Author
Guy Hatchard, PhD, is a New Zealander who was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID, a global food testing and safety company (now known as FoodChain ID).
You can subscribe to Dr. Hatchard’s websites HatchardReport.com and GLOBE.GLOBAL for regular updates by email. GLOBE.GLOBAL is a website dedicated to providing information about the dangers of biotechnology. You can also follow Dr. Hatchard on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: World News
So what else is new: This Covid virus was released by POTUS 45 Trump given the timeline and now he wants a peace medal – What I’d give him would be on the end of a rope – Genocide on a World Wide scale and now we can prove it, from one of his own Horse’s Mouth: It started in North Carolina. They shipped it to Wuhan, China (for the Military Games there, when Military Athletes from 100 Countries all gathered in Wuhan to compete, to catch America’s Covid-19 Neucloids virus: The Expose, back in 2019 published that DARPA Scientists were bragging on Twitter that they had made the Covid-19 virus with Moderna – which Moderna went on to Patent in 2013: From that patent for Moderna’s Covid-19 Neucloids virus: #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG – They started in 2002 on C19
America held The Covid-19 virus in a Level 4 Bio Lab from 2013 to 2019, but for 6 years, in North Carolina before releasing it in Wuhan, China, as a Military Project (according to Latypova), at the Military Games there, where 100 Countries sent their Military Athletes to compete (according to a document suppressed by Biden, released in 2025) and that is how the virus was spread around the world by America as a Military Operation (Latypova): Senator Tuberville 1819 News, on Monday, July 14 2025 – 2019 – and the vaccines which in America, POTUS 45 released after he used the Prep Act at least 10 times, to force his vaccines onto America and the World at the same time as Tedos in Europe and AUKUS for England, Australia and America.
Mculloch said that Trump won’t discuss his vaccines or his relationship with Bill Gates, who you will recall he had a sit down meal with, after being re-elected POTUS 47, so is Bill Gates the financier for both Trump and Biden and the release of Moderna’s Covid-19 and the vaccines which followed, which The Expose revealed, POTUS 45 Trump, had used The Prep Act at least 10 times to force them into Law and all that has since followed?
Vaccines which POTUS 45 and POTUS 47 Trump, has never been publicly seen, as having injected unlike POTUS 46 Biden, who televised his injections. If they are so safe, surely POTUS 45 & 47 would be televised having the “real confirmed Replicon vaccines” too?, but this one here:
Unlike traditional injected vaccines, CVXGA1 is delivered through the nose and directly enters the respiratory system. The platform is based on parainfluenza virus type 5, a known communicable respiratory virus. According to the trial data, viral shedding was clearly detected in nasal swabs just one day after administration, with viral loads reaching thousands of particles per milliliter. Yet researchers failed to study whether this shedding could result in actual transmission to others.
Critics, including scientists and health freedom advocates, have sounded alarms over what they call a dangerous oversight. Dr. Karl Jablonowski of Children’s Health Defense noted the live-virus nature of the shot makes it “self-spreading” and bypasses informed consent protocols, potentially infecting others without their knowledge. Dr. Karina Acevedo Whitehouse, a microbiologist at the Autonomous University of Querétaro, agreed there is a high likelihood of persistent shedding, citing similar outcomes in earlier intranasal vaccine studies.
These warnings come amid broader criticism over the necessity and safety of another COVID vaccine. Existing mRNA shots, like those from Pfizer and Moderna, have faced widespread scrutiny over adverse events including myocarditis, blood clots, immune suppression, and neurological symptoms. With many studies showing that the efficacy of COVID vaccines wanes within months, experts question the rationale behind developing an intranasal version that could pose new and unstudied risks.
As reported in 1819 News, on Monday, July 14 2025, Senator Tuberville spoke to the Alabama Grocers Association about the financial difficulties the country faces. Following his remarks about the U.S. government’s enormous deficit spending, he mentioned the COVID-19 pandemic
Covid absolutely destroyed our country, and we allowed it to happen through federal regulations and shutting down schools, nobody going to work, our health care went to hell in a handbasket. It was devastating, and where did it start? It started in North Carolina. They shipped it to Wuhan, China. They released it there, and look what happened? At the end of the day, you’re going to find out, and of course, everybody said this was a conspiracy theory: it was done on purpose. Made us all sick. It wasn’t as bad physically for those of us that didn’t have bad health problems. If you had a bad health problem, you really struggled with it.
There is no valid scientific evidence that SARS-CoV-2 exists at all. Covid-19 is a misdiagnosis based on fraudulent test results and common symptoms. The PCR test was completely invalidated by external peer review in 2020.
Detailed epidemiological analysis by Prof.Denis Rancourt et al has proved beyond all doubt that there was no pandemic caused by person to person spread of a pathogen. Iatrogenic murders took place during the “first wave” of the pseudopandemic.
The pseudopandemic psy-op was largely conducted to convince people to get the lethal injections which continue to kill millions. Check your facts. Get the story right. The truth matters.
I agree with the concerns raised here. The inquiry threatens to be another litany of lies. It is heading that way, by the looks of it.
I want to have a public debate with Prof. Le Gros about the safety and effectiveness of this miracle vaccine. How about we do that, invite him and three of his buddies and four of us on the other side? If they don’t turn up, we can still have the debate.
basically the Commission shows a flagrant disregard for human life but one not unexpected by many people. The big business approach to medicine and government is academically seen by many as fascism and will, in the future, be used as a textbook example of soft fascism.
Article automatically rejected for stale internet jargon:
cherry picked
Hi Plebney, Cherry pick is not internet jargon. The use of the term pre-dates the internet.
https://daringfireball.net/linked/2020/08/07/cherry-pick
It seems cherry picking is ,according to the cambridge dict , a correct cliche for the Commission method of selection, having watched them in action. They are focused and astute at their cherry-picking and their objectives transparent. They are honest about their choice of experts over science, because commercial science isn’t really science.
So true! “commercial science isn’t really science.” If a scientist comes up with a solution that really works but isn’t at all commercially viable, then he or she gets “shown the door”, or worse…
This “Inquiry” is proceeding on the assumption, not the proof, there was/ is an actual virus.
All downstream decisions (lockdowns, mandates, “vaccines”) are therefore treated as justified, without first establishing the legitimacy of the alleged threat.
That’s a reversal of scientific method and due process. You prove the threat first, then justify your response. Modelling is an excuse to find a threat.