|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The UK’s Online Safety Act is about censorship rather than safety. It requires age checks and algorithm changes that are leading to over-censorship of content.
The law’s scope of “harmful content” is subjective and can result in the blocking of legal content, with reports of censorship already emerging in the UK, including the blocking of footage and subreddits.
Censorship being imposed by the Act has caught the attention of US lawmakers, both Democrats and Republicans. Democrat Senator Ron Wyden and Republican House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan have both expressed concerns about the impact the Act has on free expression and First Amendment rights in the US.
Related:
- Keir Starmer’s unrestrained war on freedom of speech continues
- UK’s Online Safety Act has kick-started a global frenzy of online censorship and surveillance
- UK’s Online Safety Act is restricting speech globally; the UK government is censoring the world
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
The UK Online Safety Act Is About Censorship, Not Safety
By Paige Collins, as published by The Register on 21 August 2025
Implementation of the UK’s Online Safety Act (“OSA”) is giving internet users around the globe – including those in US states moving to enact their own age verification laws – real-time proof that such laws impinge on everyone’s rights to speak, read and view freely.
The new OSA rules require all online services accessible in the UK – social media, search engines, music sites and adult content providers – to enforce age checks to keep children from seeing “harmful content.” Online services also must change their algorithms and moderation systems to keep such content from young people.
Social media platforms Reddit, Bluesky, Discord and X all introduced age checks to block children from seeing harmful content; adult websites implemented age assurance checks on their sites, asking users to either upload government-issued ID, provide an email address for comparison against use on other sites, or submit personal information to a third-party vendor for age verification. Sites like Spotify are requiring users to submit face scans to third-party digital identity company Yoti to access content labelled 18+.
The scope of so-called “harmful content” is subjective and arbitrary, and often sweeps up content that governments and CEOs of online services might not want online – regardless of whether this is legal content or not. Add to this the law threatening large fines or even jail time for non-compliance, and platforms pre-emptively over-censor content to ensure they won’t be held liable.
And reports from the UK are already showing how age checks are being used to censor content that falls outside the OSA across the internet. This includes footage of police attacking pro-Palestinian protestors being blocked on X, multiple subreddits blocked, including r/IsraelExposed, r/safesexPH and r/stopsmoking, and some smaller websites closing down entirely.
No one – no matter their age, no matter what country they live in – should have to hand over their passport or driver’s license just to access legal information and speak freely. And users in the UK know this: Days after age checks went into effect, VPN apps – “virtual private networks” that protect your internet connection and privacy online – became among the most downloaded apps in Apple’s App Store in the UK.
A similar spike in searches for VPNs occurred in January when Florida joined an ever-growing list of US states implementing age verification laws. But while VPNs may be able to disguise internet activity’s source, they are neither foolproof nor a solution to age verification laws. Ofcom has started discouraging their use and some Labour Party politicians have even argued for a ban on VPNs – a terrifying effort to exercise authoritarian control on accessing information.
This censorship regime also extends to the physical realm, with the arrogant and inaccurate assumption that every person has an official identification document or their own smartphone. Millions of people both in the UK and the US lack official ID, and many might share a device with family members or use public devices at libraries or internet cafes. These millions – often lower-income or older people who are already marginalised and for whom the internet may be a critical lifeline – will be excluded from online speech and will lose access to much of the internet, further restricting access to information and the possibility to engage online.
Some US officials seem to see the writing on the wall. “The UK now requires ID to read about Middle East politics, visit r/stopsmoking and listen to almost any hip hop music online,” US Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) wrote on X adding that after the Wikimedia Foundation lost its court challenge to the OSA, “using Wikipedia could be next. Once sites require age verification for the UK, there’s little stopping them doing the same in the US”
That sentiment is bipartisan. After visiting the UK in late July, House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, issued a statement saying the OSA helps “create a serious chilling effect on free expression and threaten the First Amendment rights of American citizens and companies.”
“We absolutely need to protect children and keep harmful, illegal content off these platforms – but when governments or bureaucracies suppress speech in the name of safety or regulation, it sets a dangerous precedent that threatens the core of Western democratic values,” Jordan said.
Yet other state and federal US lawmakers are moving full-speed ahead. Twenty-four states have already passed some sort of age verification censorship law and more are considering doing so, while some bipartisan bills in Congress would do the same.
The UK’s scramble to find an effective age verification method underscores that there isn’t one, and it’s high time for politicians around the world to take that seriously – especially those pondering similar laws in the US. Rather than weakening rights for already vulnerable communities online, governments everywhere must acknowledge these shortcomings and explore less invasive approaches – such as comprehensive privacy legislation – to protect all people from online harms, especially as authoritarianism spreads around the globe.
Politicians in the UK, the US and beyond must consider what’s best, not what’s easiest.
About the Author
Paige Collings is a Senior Speech and Privacy Activist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a non-profit digital civil liberties group based in San Francisco.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Uncategorised
when liebour say the online safety act is to protect the children there clearly lying through there teeth for example where was the protection for the young girls who were raped by the rape gangs HYPOCRITES….be sure to check out and read carefully a petition on the uk government and parliament petition page…repeal the online safety act…it currently has 527,842, signatures it urgently needs many more and you can help in getting them first be sure to sign it and then and most importantly be sure to reshare it widely all over the uk wales/scotland/northern ireland/england/….with as many like minded people as you possibly can and be sure to ask each one of them to do exactly the same as im asking you to do in this message