|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Imperial College professor Friederike Otto, who is also a climate crisis activist, has been selected to be the coordinating lead author on the next IPCC assessment report on climate change for the chapter on extreme weather events.
Prof. Otto is also the founder and head of World Weather Attribution, which monitors extreme weather events to assess the influence of human-induced climate change and is funded by global foundations that fund most of the climate crisis agenda.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
The following is paraphrased, with added context, from the article ‘UN abandons science and hires climate change zealots who damn the facts’ written by Roger Pielke Jr. and published by the New York Post.
Roger Pielke Jr. is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (“AEI”), where he focuses on science and technology policy, climate policy, energy policy, extreme events and disasters, the politicisation of science, governmental science advice and sports governance.
The IPCC Abandons Science And Hires Climate Change Zealots Who Damn The Facts
The politicisation of expert roles has become a significant issue, with politicians often selecting experts based on their political views rather than their willingness to provide unbiased information.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”), a United Nations organisation responsible for assessing climate science, has traditionally been committed to providing accurate and unbiased information, Pielke says. But its recent selection of authors for its seventh assessment report has raised concerns that it may be abandoning its commitment to scientific rigour.
One of its most important chapters [of the IPCC report] is on extreme weather events – how they may have changed over time, and understanding the reasons for any identified changes.
Much to its credit, despite media reports that breathlessly hype every hurricane, flood and tornado as being worsened by climate change, the IPCC has for decades called things straight.
People are often surprised to learn that the most recent IPCC report did not detect increasing trends in the incidence of hurricanes, floods, tornadoes or drought. The IPCC did find increases in heat waves (and decreases in frigid outbreaks), heavy precipitation (in some locations), soil moisture deficits and fire weather.
Because the IPCC has consistently failed to establish strong connections between greenhouse gas emissions and most types of extreme weather, a cottage industry of promotional studies has developed in its place.
“Extreme event attribution” was invented to circumvent the normal process of scientific peer review in order to have media impact and to support litigation against fossil fuel companies.
UN abandons science and hires climate change zealots who damn the facts, New York Post, 22 August 2025
Eleven researchers from Imperial College London have been selected as authors of the IPCC’s Assessment Report 7 (AR7), the highest number for any institution. One of them is Friederike Otto, a Professor in Climate Science at the Centre for Environmental Policy and the co-founder and head of World Weather Attribution (“WWA”).
WWA is an international research collaboration which conducts rapid, real-time analysis of extreme weather events to assess the influence of human-induced climate change. As well as Imperial College, participating institutions include the University of Oxford Environmental Change Institute, the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, the Laboratoire des sciences du climat et de l’environnement, the University of Princeton, the US National Centre for Atmospheric Research and the Red Cross/Red Crescent Climate Centre.
“Through extensive media engagement – including The Guardian, the Daily Mail, The Times, Scientific American, CBS, BBC and many more – WWA has helped to change the global conversation around climate change,” according to Oxford University’s Climate Research Network.
Prof. Otto’s organisation is funded by the Grantham Foundation, the Bezos Earth Foundation and the European Climate Foundation.
The Grantham Foundation and Bezos Earth Foundation are two of the 27 global foundations funding the ClimateWorks Foundation. Earlier this year, ClimateWorks removed the list of its funders from its website, but you can find an archive of it HERE.
The Grantham Foundation and ClimateWorks are among the 24 funders of the European Climate Foundation. Other funders include the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Bloomberg Philanthropies and Chris Hohn’s Children’s Investment Fund Foundation.
Related:
- BBC, Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit and Bank of England fail fact check on statements made about climate change
- “Fossil Fuel Treaty” activism is funded by a small group of global foundations
- Climate crisis activists seek to put meat on their list of banned “fossil fuel” adverts
- Corrupt and incompetent UK Climate Change Committee should be disbanded
AR7 will be the third IPCC assessment report for Prof. Otto but this time she will be playing a leading role. She will be the coordinating lead author of AR7’s chapter on extreme weather. As such, Prof. Otto boasts, she will have significant influence over the chapter’s structure and focus. And Prof. Otto is a climate crisis activist. In a new book, ‘Climate Injustice: Why We Need to Fight Global Inequality to Combat Climate Change’, Otto argues that racism, colonialism and sexism are the root causes of global warming.
So, with her inherent biases and her funding at stake, Prof. Otto’s IPCC appointment is a concern. Scientific assessments are supposed to reflect the underlying peer-reviewed literature, not the inclinations of its lead authors.
But it gets worse. Otto is joined by two other lead authors and 17 other authors. Of these 20, 9 focus their work on “extreme event attribution.”
The selection of authors for the IPCC’s chapter on extreme weather events has created tensions between the IPCC’s traditional approach, which focuses on detecting long-term changes in weather phenomena and connecting them to particular causes, and the approach of “extreme event attribution,” which seeks to establish connections between climate change and specific weather events.
This tension is seen in the contrasting conclusions drawn by a peer-reviewed study and by WWA about floods in Pakistan. As Pielke explained:
A peer-reviewed climate modelling study of flooding in Pakistan concluded: “Understanding how climate change affects monsoon regions in South Asia is not straightforward.”
In contrast, for Otto’s WWA, establishing a connection between climate change and Pakistan’s floods is easy: “Every tenth of a degree of warming will lead to heavier monsoon rainfall, highlighting why a rapid transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy is so urgent.”
By putting WWA and its fellow travellers in charge of the IPCC’s chapter on extreme events, the IPCC is signalling that media hits, climate litigation and energy advocacy trump rigorous science.
UN abandons science and hires climate change zealots who damn the facts, New York Post, 22 August 2025
Featured image: Friederike Otto. Source: Deutschland
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
When women wear long earrings: it’s a bad sign. Trust me.
The outcome of all of this is predictable: extreme weather will in the next IPCC report be a major problem which has increased dramatically.
Two things that really annoy me is that these zealots are being paid for their BS, which just encourages them even more.. Secondly, they are indoctrinating our young with this pseudo science BS as well.
I once read an small article in an 1800’s printed journal when a contributor was complaining about “fools being aloud to employ other fools, more stupid than them”. And how society was deteriorating because of it. How true and how apt and nothing changes does it.
As soon as Imperial College is mentioned, we know the score.
The fact that the weather manipulation processes, such as stratospheric aerosol injections (which heats up the ionosphere), chemtrailing, solar radiation management and cloudseeding are being heavily employed worldwide, has been ignore in this article.
This in turn links in with the UN claiming private properties, through the back door of local councils, in the name of climate emergencies/ catastrophes and have remedial strategies of managed retreats to usher people into and off their own properties.
The whole climate emergency agenda is founded on landgrab.
Ah a flat earther has appeared. 60 billion cubic miles of highly variable non model able atmosphere takes no notice of humans…and there is no such thing as chemtrails. Distraction.
Students at all levels of education is being brainwashed with this fake pseudo-science BS, which is paid with taxpayer’s money. The legacy media is pushing this fake narrative as well.
So these cretins are saying we will have longer shorter drier wetter hotter colder summers and shorter longer wetter drier colder hotter snow free but with lots of snow winters…with greater fewer hurricanes which will be stronger weaker and the coral will shrink grow and the polar ice will get larger smaller….because that’s what it sounds like to me . They are clearly very clever stupid.
AI-Led Study Confirms ‘Climate Change’ Narrative Is a Hoax
Frank BergmanMarch 25, 2025
https://slaynews.com/news/ai-led-study-confirms-climate-change-narrative-hoax/
Most experts agree that 1,500 ppm is the maximum CO2 level for maximum plant growth, although any CO2 level between 1,000 ppm and 1,500 ppm will produce greatly improved results. Greenhouse CO2 levels are jacked up to enhance plant growth.
co2. earth/co2-ice-core-data
The average CO2 ppm level the last thousand up till 1841 years averaged approximately 280 ppm. Since 1841 CO2 levels have increased to 422 ppm in Jan. 2024. That helps plant growth.
Anything below 200 ppm starves plant growth! Carbon dioxide is essential to the process of photosynthesis. Most plants grown indoors require a minimum CO2 concentration of 330 ppm to enable them to photosynthesise efficiently and produce energy in the form of carbohydrates. These concentrations of CO2 are enough for plants to grow and develop normally.
Millions of years ago CO2 ppm levels and temperature was much higher. Plants thrived! Concentrations of CO 2 in the atmosphere were as high as 4,000 ppm during the Cambrian period about 500 million years ago, and as low as 180 ppm during the Quaternary glaciation of the last two million years.
Ice core data does not lie! Look it up! I just did.
Greta Thunberg, Al Gore and Bill Gates are lying leftist frauds!
Industrial CO2 emissions since 1841 likely staved off an Ice Age!
Challenging Modern Climate Narratives: Forgotten 1937 Aerial Photos Expose Antarctic Anomaly
By UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN – FACULTY OF SCIENCE JUNE 11, 2024
scitechdaily. com/challenging-modern-climate-narratives-forgotten-1937-aerial-photos-expose-antarctic-anomaly/
Researchers at the University of Copenhagen have utilized aerial photos from 1937 to analyze the stability and growth of East Antarctica’s ice, revealing that despite some signs of weakening, the ice has remained largely stable over almost a century, enhancing predictions of sea-level rise. Credit: Norwegian Polar Institute in Tromsø
More About the Study