The UK is planning to launch a digital ID app called ‘GOV.UK Wallet’ by the end of 2025.
At the same time, the Labour government is currently considering a proposed mandatory, universal digital identity system, called the BritCard, advocated by the think tank Labour Together.
The Britcard will be a free digital credential stored on a smartphone via the GOV.UK Wallet app, designed to verify an individual’s right to live, work and rent in the UK.
This is a digital prison. Those who comply risk not only their own autonomy but also the future freedom of their children and grandchildren. Future generations may never know what it means to live outside constant surveillance.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Digital ID: The Rising Debate Over Freedom, Privacy and Control
By Mairi Allan, as published by Declaration of Dumfries
Currently in the UK, a Wallet and Digital ID App – a mobile app called “GOV.UK Wallet” – is set to launch at the end of 2025 (for both Android and iOS). It allows users to store government-issued documents, like veteran cards and digital driver’s licences. By 2027, all UK government services issuing physical credentials must offer a digital alternative. This Labour government is considering a mandatory or widely used digital ID card (“BritCard”), but there is no official rollout timeline yet.
The GOV.UK Wallet has already begun phased deployment with public sector bodies, which started in May 2024 and a broader rollout is expected through 2025.
Some of you may have experienced situations when they have collected your data digitally – if you bought a new car on finance or applied for a new job in the last year or two. It’s time-consuming and often tricky but once they’ve got your data, that’s it. The card would be linked to government records and could be checked by employers or landlords.
Eventually serving as a one-stop shop for a range of government services whilst also holding information and records on you – such as claiming benefits, ordering passports, storing your medical records, your vaccination status, carbon credit scores, etc. The list will be endless. It could have any police records, your social media activity, any arrests or cautions or even “hurty words” you may have written on Facebook – all logged on there for future employers to see!
Critics warn that a decades-long project to centralise identity could lock humanity into a permission-based digital system.
For some, the rise of digital identification systems represents progress – a step toward convenience, efficiency and security in an increasingly online world. But for a growing number of critics, digital ID is not a neutral tool. It is, they argue, the culmination of a control grid that has been quietly under construction for decades.
Sceptics say the covid-19 pandemic was the testing ground. Emergency measures, restrictions and health passes revealed just how far populations could be pushed in the name of safety. Now, with governments and international bodies accelerating plans for digital IDs, critics insist that the final piece of a long-planned surveillance framework is falling into place.
Digital ID is not about convenience or modernisation; it is the linchpin of a system designed to monitor, restrict and ultimately control every aspect of our lives.
Concerns centre on the scope of what digital ID could encompass. Once linked to financial accounts, healthcare access, travel permissions, or even speech online, it could give authorities – or corporations – unprecedented power. At the press of a button, critics warn, people could be denied access to money, medical treatment or the ability to move freely.
Opponents describe this as a “digital prison.” They argue that those who comply – often out of fear or in pursuit of convenience – risk not only their own autonomy but also the future freedom of their children and grandchildren. Future generations may never know what it means to live outside constant surveillance.
Proponents of digital ID, by contrast, argue that it can help combat fraud, make cross-border travel easier and streamline interactions with governments and businesses. In the European Union, for instance, the upcoming EU Digital Identity Wallet is being promoted as a secure way for citizens to store documents and credentials. In countries such as India and Estonia, digital ID systems are already widely used, though they remain controversial.
Still, critics believe the dangers far outweigh any convenience. To them, the introduction of digital ID marks a “line in the sand.” Once widely adopted, they say, the shift could be irreversible. Critics argue that a mandatory digital ID would fundamentally change the relationship with the state and create a “papers, please” society, posing a risk to privacy and data security. A centralised digital ID could become a target for hackers and could lead to increased state surveillance.
The think-tank Labour Together has estimated the BritCard system would cost up to £400 million to build and around £10 million a year to administer as a free-to-use app.
If we accept digital ID, we may seal humanity’s future – and there may be no way back. There is no law right now to say we must have a “BritCard”; it is a concept, not a legal requirement. Resist it, refuse it, and explain its dangers to others.
Privacy became a basic right in modern democracies for a reason: why are policy people proposing to casually abandon a core principle? And that’s without getting into the risks of uploading vast amounts of personal information on “a leaky centralised system.”
Further reading:
- Digital dystopia looms large in the UK, The Exposé, 26 June 2025
- Universal digital ‘BritCards’ on an app could soon be used to prove who you are, Metro, 6 June 2025
- Fingerprint Cards AB – One Big Step Closer to Digital IDs, Armstrong Economics, 25 June 2023
- Forging Our Digital Future With 5G: A Strategy For Scotland, Digital Scotland, Scottish Government, August 2019
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, UK News
My hope is that most Brits will have the good sense to say, “No thank you” or, to be more polite, “Be fruitful and multiply” or words to that effect.
Far cough far quit is my personal favourite…
Or take a furlong walk off a nine chain pier pal.
Unfortunately it’s not the case judging by all the NPC’ s obeying their black rectangular prison devices during the resent Government ‘Emergency Alert’
The Covid Phy-op obviously worked.
Every single person who tells themselves they can’t live without a mobile phone is complicit in the rollout of the whole digital system. Life is perfectly manageable without one, as it always has been.
Carrying a mobile around with you everywhere you go is an induced dependence, put in place to ensure that everybody would have to comply with their digital ID the removal of cash and total control over your bank account, (where you shop, everything you buy and whether your purchases are “green” enough to fit their agenda ) your medical status, ( think C*vid passport), tracking of your location, who you are with and probably recording everything you say.
None of this is in our interests, it serves only those who wish to control us. To add insult to injury, they make you pay thousands, in some cases to buy your own enslavement device and then make you feel you have to take it everywhere. I’ve heard people even sleep with them !! Do you think they hadn’t planned this ?
It is very liberating to not have one.You are not contactable 24 hours a day, and you don’t need to be. If you are not available when someone rings you (yes, on a land line) they can ring back later.You can go for a walk without constantly answering the demands of the infernal machine in your pocket. You are perfectly safe. If enough people refuse to carry them, the government will not be able to impose a digital anything.
To those suffering a panic attack at the very idea of being without these electronic manacles, ease yourself in gently. Put your phone in a drawer, rather than in your pocket or bag. Go out without it (take some cash) spend your day as a free human being once again. You will find that you don’t actually NEED it for anything. You may suffer separation anxiety, but recognise it for what it is and get on with your day. Do the same the next day. Only take the phone out of the drawer if you know with certainty that you will need to call someone or they will need to call you eg picking someone up from a train etc You will find that life is perfectly possible and even better when you don’t have a phone.
Stop lying to yourself, you can live without your slavery, just take your manacles off.
that’s sound advice – if you need to take a phone to be picked up etc. then take a non-smart phone with a pay as you go (via cash) SIM and you can remove the battery – that’s what i have done for the last 5 years – and i rarely take any phone with me – probably a handful of times a year.
Gov are happy to be seen benevolent in their actions and offerings with their digital platforms / digital identity and so-called security. But remain silent with their terms and conditions for the use of their property.
Digital identities are contracts.
Beware!
A citizen is a legal fiction that is the property of the Crown and its government.
Those born before digitalisation know freedom. After their demise, only those born into digital age left; freedom is scary unfamiliar to them, so feel safer cooped-up. Even out and about they cling to their box.
Never had freedom so do not miss it, but distressed without phone in which put all personal data, instead of secure in their head. Data or person secure? Secured by who, safe for who, person or controller? Convenient for who?
Trained to stay dependent infants, not develop mentally or emotionally into adults who live independent of umbilical chord, and walk alone without hand held.
Credit reference agencies now access, hold, control, score, disseminate all data including health, age and gender to all including foreign utility and retail entities.
www – ‘welcome to my trap’ said spider to fly.
agreed and i was only just talking to a neighbour about the situation (him and his wife are also very concerned) and i believe that the cabal have played their hand too early – i think they got too confident after seeing how obedient people were during convid – but there is still the older generation that did not grow up tethered to digital devices and we are educating the younger generations and pushing back – they should have waited another 20 years when we would all be gone and it would have been very easy.
Agree, they were too impatient
Credit reference agencies refuse to validate their identity!
Digital security is total bullshit.