|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
In a shocking announcement, the National Toxicology Program (NTP) has announced that it will no longer investigate any evidence linking cellphone radiation to harm caused in animals or people. Even though this very type of research is why the NTP exists, the agency has decided that, from here on out, it will never again even attempt to study whether or not cellphone radiation harms people and their pets.
“(There’s) no scientific explanation or justification for this sudden reversal,” said Devra Davis, a former senior adviser to the assistant secretary for health at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
According to the NTP, it is simply too hard to study the negative effects of cellphone radiation – or as they put it, conducting radiofrequency radiation (RFR) studies is too “technically challenging and more resource-intensive than expected.”
Davis says this is not a valid excuse, otherwise the NTP could claim this same thing about every other type of research it conducts.
“Everything that we know for sure causes cancer in people will produce it in animals when adequately studied,” Davis added.
NTP never even published supposedly “completed” 2019 research
The last time the NTP even attempted any type of research into cellphone radiation was back in 2019 when it developed a novel, small-scale RFR exposure system. In the process of developing that system, the NTP abruptly stopped all research, leaving only completed research on highly outdated 2G and 3G frequencies, and nothing for the more modern 4G (LTE) and 5G technologies used on most smartphones.
Davis is dumbfounded by the decision, seeing as how she helped make recommendations for the NTP concerning how to develop its test chambers. Since it takes years for such studies to be planned, Davis said it is “beyond my comprehension at this point” why the NTP suddenly stopped setting up the trial.
The NTP claims that its work on the small-scale exposure systems and accompanying research has been completed and that the full results will be posted on the agency’s website only “when internal reviews are finished.” It has been five years, though, and there is still nothing published on the 2019 trial.
In 2018, the NTP published the results of two-year toxicology studies showing “clear evidence” of a link between 2G and 3G cellphone radiation and cancer tumors in male rats. Follow-up research in 2019 likewise showed DNA damage in the brain, liver and blood cells of exposed rodents.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had originally requested to oversee these studies as they were conducted, but the FDA has since dismissed the NTP’s findings entirely.
In 2019, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approved the latest 5G technologies using outdated 1996 radiation standards – 5G did not even exist in 1996, just to be clear. To help pull the wool over America’s eyes, the FDA anonymously produced an unreviewed document in 2020 that it claims supports the “safe” use of 5G technology.
The Environmental Health Trust (EHT) sued the FCC for this travesty, resulting in a 2021 U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruling against the FCC. It was determined that the FCC acted improperly and illegally by relying on the outdated 1996 wireless radiation exposure limits.
“The court found the FCC ignored evidence that radiation below its current limits can cause adverse health effects besides cancer, noting that the FCC also failed to respond to comments about the environmental harm caused by radiation,” reports explain.
“The court ordered revised standards accounting for EHT’s records on risks to children and the environment.”
If at all possible, limit your exposure to RFs and EMFs to protect you and your family from deadly radiation.
Epoch Times advise reducing RFR exposure by:
- Not carrying phones in pockets or bras
- Using speakerphone and holding phones away from the head/body
- Keeping devices away from reproductive organs
- Using wired over WiFi internet
- Not sleeping near phones.
Sources include:
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News
This is a shame, I have an understanding of how radiation transfers energy. Unless there is resonance with water in this case, which we are made of, there is little problem. I suspect this is not to be risked, and confirmed by research. Has anyone more info please? Ithink its another nail in the coffin of man made Global warming by junk science explanations.
They are able to emit 240mW/m2. Measured,
One mW/m2 is already ‘extreme concern’.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izFt9qxgAjk&t=2s
I worked in GPO/Post Office Telecommunications/BT used pagers and mobiles for many years. Many engineers suffered headaches and had strange areas of heat in their bodies that changed after a few weeks of holidays but returned soon after coming back to work.
They talked constantly for hours each day on mobiles. These were undoubtedly caused the problems.
As a trainer I knew that Radio Paging Base stations and how they used various high frequency transmission rates, some pulsed were the problem.
I told the company that they needed to provide hands free kits to protect the engineers and they were promptly provided.
Devra Davies and her colleagues are absolutely correct. They 4,5 and 6G systems are far more dangerous. Young children are at higher risk.
And pets, also small with thin bones.
Should I believe Imperial College London and Sweden’s Karolinska Institute or should I believe Devra Davis?
“Phones are NOT linked to giving your cancer, major new international study of 250,000 mobile users says”
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13232231/Phones-NOT-linked-giving-cancer.html
I seem to recall that ‘trousers down’ Neil Ferguson was from Imperial College London and I recall things about his “modelling”.
Right – believe Imperial College London believe Devra Davis – decision made.
A study of 250,000 people for seven years cannot tell us anything about a cancer that has a normal rate of seven per hundred thousand and a latency of up to 40 years from first exposures to the cancer developing. Although the UK Karolinska study employed state of the art techniques, the study lack of statistical power to determine a risk in humans. We need to listen to the animals otherwise we’re treating our children like lab rats in an experiment with controls.
Thank you Devra. My post should have read – “believe Imperial College London OR believe Devra Davis”.
Of course when I wrote “decision made” you know which way I had decided.
[…] https://expose-news.com/2024/03/24/cover-up-phone-radiation-research-cancelled-after-safety-risks-un… […]
“I told you so” 4 years ago.
_Abi_
Patricia, what about an article about ionizers? Only if you have the time. It is claimed that radiation from phones and the rest are harmful because they positively charge the ‘air’ and depletes your cells’ energy. It is visible on red blood cells – rouleaux formation. As far as I understood but I can be wrong, all the effective EMF protection devices work as a kind of ionizers releasing negatively charged ions.
I am just back from abroad, I tested MACs, I stumbled into a very very interesting new thing. I just want to double check my findings, but the basic part that now every second or 3rd unidentified MAC address (Bluetooth Scanner) are coming from an I stuff, if you push the more button, it will yell you that that MAC belongs to an IWatch or iPhone 12.1 and other different versions but still unidentified and they start with 4 or 4, 5, 6 (Pfzer) or 7 (Modr). I want to check them one by one with a MAC identifier, I took screenshots. Oh and my old IPhone I carry only for emergencies and for photos suddenly went wrong I was unable to call anyone with no reason, according the network provider it should have worked well. Another phone, same network provider but with ‘pay as you go’ sim worked well.
Since then I checked, I am happy to share my photos.
I detected about 60ish MAC addresses on a plane which were unidentified (despite of MAC is being a protocol). I used an Android phone with Bluetooth scanner application. There is a button to ‘more’ where I could see that appx. 2/3 of the MAC remained totally unidentified, and the rest allegedly came from Apple stuff (I Watch, I phone, notebook), however, I re-checked 4 MACs claimed to belonging to an I stuff and they remained unidentifiable.
Since when Apple has the right to be exempt from the protocol? If not what is really happening?
For me, unvaxxed the important thing is to know that with time does the nanotech based computer injected into people disappear or not?
What I saw could mean that it can disappear (reduced amount of people with nanotech) but also can mean a new psyop where the Apple cons people falsifying the result of the (for now well known application) Bluetooth scanner pretending that those MACs in fact not coming from people.
The question is – IT professional – that the MAC address belongs to the watch or iPhone or that just bypassing the MAC address of the owner.
That is outrageous — not investigating radiation from phones!!
disband the organization.
[…] COVER-UP: Phone Radiation Research Cancelled After Safety Risks Uncovered. […]