|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Japanese researchers have published a pre-print paper that warns about the risks associated with using blood from COVID-19-vaccinated people for blood transfusions and are calling on medical professionals to be aware of these risks.
Additionally, to avoid these risks and prevent further contamination of blood products and resulting complications, they are calling for the COVID-19 vaccination programmes to be suspended.
“The health injuries caused by genetic vaccination are already extremely serious, and it is high time that countries and relevant organisations take concrete steps together to identify the risks and to control and resolve them,” they said.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Many countries around the world have reported that so-called genetic vaccines – such as those using modified mRNA encoding the spike protein and lipid nanoparticles as the drug delivery system – have resulted in post-vaccination thrombosis and subsequent cardiovascular damage, as well as a wide variety of diseases involving all organs and systems, including the nervous system.
Based on these reports and the volume of evidence that has come to light, through their paper, the researchers are bringing to the attention of medical professionals the various risks associated with blood transfusions using blood products derived from people who have suffered from long covid and from genetic vaccine recipients, including those who have received mRNA vaccines.
However, “it should also be stressed that the issues discussed here are matters that pertain to all organ transplants, including bone marrow transplants, and not just blood products,” the researchers wrote.
Table 1 of the paper summarised the six major concerns identified by the researchers with the use of blood products derived from gene vaccine recipients. We have copied the contents of Table 1 below.
1. Spike protein contamination
The spike protein, which is the antigen of SARS-CoV-2 and genetic vaccines, has already been found to have various toxicities, including effects on red blood cells and platelet aggregation, amyloid formation, and neurotoxicity. It is essential to recognise that the spike protein itself is toxic to humans. It has also been reported that the spike protein can cross the blood-brain barrier. Therefore, it is essential to remove the spike protein derived from the gene vaccine itself from blood products.
2. Contamination with amyloid aggregates and microthrombi formed by spike proteins
It is not yet clear how the amyloid aggregates and microthrombi formed by the spike proteins develop into visible thrombi. However, once formed, amyloid aggregates may not be readily cleared and therefore need to be removed from blood products. These amyloid aggregates have also been shown to be toxic.
3. Events attributable to decreased donor immune system and immune abnormalities due to immune imprinting or class switch to IgG4, etc. resulting from multiple doses of genetic vaccines
When the immune function of a donor is impaired by gene vaccination, there is a risk that the donor has some (subclinical) infectious disease or is infected with a pathogenic virus and has developed viremia or other conditions, even if the donor has no subjective symptoms. For this reason, healthcare professionals who perform surgical procedures, including blood sampling and organ transplantation, as well as using blood products, should manage the blood of genetic vaccine recipients with care to prevent infection through blood. It will also be necessary to inform all healthcare professionals of these risks.
4. Lipid nanoparticles (“LNPs”) and pseudouridinated mRNA (mRNA vaccines only)
In the case of mRNA vaccines, LNPs and pseudouridinated mRNA may remain in the blood of recipients if blood is collected without a sufficient deferral period after gene vaccination. LNPs are highly inflammatory and have been found to be thrombogenic themselves, posing a risk to transfusion recipients. LNPs themselves have potent adjuvant activity and are at risk of inducing Adjuvant-Induced Autoimmune Syndrome (“ASIA syndrome”). An additional risk is that if the pseudouridinated mRNA is incorporated into the recipient’s blood while still packaged in LNPs, additional spike protein may be produced in the recipient’s body.
5. Contamination with aggregated red blood cells or platelets
The spike protein causes red blood cells and platelets to aggregate and therefore these aggregates will be carried into the recipient’s blood unless they are removed from the blood product.
6. Memory B cells producing IgG4 and IgG4 produced from them
Large amounts (serum concentration typically above 1.25–1.4 g/L) of non-inflammatory IgG4-positive plasma cells can cause chronic inflammation such as fibroinflammatory disease.
IgG4 is an antibody and is the acronym for immunoglobulin G4. Earlier in the paper, the authors wrote that “long-term exposure to a specific identical antigen (in this case, spike protein) causes immunoglobulins to become IgG4 and some of the B cells [or lymphocytes] that produce them are likely to differentiate into memory B cells that survive in the body for a sustained period, the immune dysfunction of genetic vaccine recipients is expected to be prolonged (Table 1, point 3 & 6). More details on these points are expected to be revealed in the future.”
The researchers also make suggestions for specific tests, testing methods and regulations to deal with these risks.
In their conclusion, the authors wrote:
The impact of these genetic vaccines on blood products and the actual damage caused by them are unknown at present. Therefore, in order to avoid these risks and prevent further expansion of blood contamination and complication of the situation, we strongly request that the vaccination campaign using genetic vaccines be suspended and that a harm–benefit assessment be carried out as early as possible.
As we have repeatedly stated, the health injuries caused by genetic vaccination are already extremely serious, and it is high time that countries and relevant organisations take concrete steps together to identify the risks and to control and resolve them.
Concerns regarding Transfusions of Blood Products Derived from Genetic Vaccine Recipients and Proposals for Specific Measures, Jun Ueda, Hideyuki Motohashi, Yuriko Hirai, Kenji Yamamoto, Yasufumi Murakami, Masanori Fukushima, Akinori Fujisawa, Non-peer reviewed version published 15 March 2024
Sources for this article include:
- Japanese Researchers Warn About Risks Associated with Blood Transfusions From Covid-19 mRNA Vaccinated Individuals, Thailand Medical News, 16 March 2024
- Ueda, J.; Motohashi, H.; Hirai, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Murakami, Y.; Fukushima, M.; Fujisawa, A. Concerns regarding Transfusions of Blood Products Derived from Genetic Vaccine Recipients and Proposals for Specific Measures. Preprints 2024, 2024030881. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0881.v1
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?, The Expose Blog, World News
[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]
1. “It has also been reported that the spike protein can cross the blood-brain barrier.”
That’s the picornavirus they attach it to:
Ralph Baric 2018 coronavirus patent (9884895B2):
“The capsid and E glycoprotein genes from Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus are replaced with the Coronavirus Spike Protein gene S.”
Picornaviruses are listed in the c-vax patent 2015/0030576A1:
“When nucleic acids are provided with an IRES, further optionally provided is a second translatable region. Examples of IRES sequences that can be used according to the invention include without limitation, those from picornaviruses (e.g. FMDV), pest viruses (CFFV), polio viruses (PV), encephalomyo carditis viruses (ECMV), foot-and-mouth disease viruses (FMDV), hepatitis C viruses (HCV), classical swine fever viruses (CSFV), murine leukemia virus (MLV), simian immune deficiency viruses (SIV) or cricket paralysis viruses (CrPV). ”
2. “Events attributable to decreased donor immune system and immune abnormalities due to immune imprinting or class switch to IgG4”
Patent technology mentions chimeric antibodies. An antibody has a ‘y’ shape. They took the front 2 y portions from a macaque monkey. These bind stronger than anything in our bodies, so once bound they are permanent. The chimeric antibodies are used to cross-react antigens on macrophage surfaces. This shuts them off, and the immune system with it. However, if the back end of the ‘y’ also binds with a macrophage, then immune responses are elicited, which is bad if you want your nanoparticles to reach ovaries or testicles. To get around this problem, they use Ig4 backbones, instead of IgG. IgG binds strongly and will elicit immune responses, but Ig4 has weak intermittent binding. Problems arise when Ig4 reach high numbers, where they become pathogenic and cause maladies such as Bulbous Pemphigoid mucosal lining disease.
That’s just 2 items addressed. It goes to show how much of the conversation is being purposely avoided.
Forget about Ralph Baric, worry about your own incompetent health advisors in the UK. THERE ARE MANY!!!!! Including your GPS!!!!!
I don’t have to worry ,simply don’t trust them . Defund the NHS !!😡💯
Where is the spike protein test? Without one, genetic vaccination should preclude blood donation for 5 years. But thereagain, the agenda is plainly to get everyone’s genes compromised one way or another.
Yes the state of Florida via the state’s surgeon general Dr.Joseph Ladapo is recommending NO ONE take any further mRNA covid vaxxes.. thank you Dr. Ladapo.when will the idiots who run the health service in the UK wake the hell,up!!! So many cancers, so many heart injuries. What are they waiting for? Everyone to die? Sure looks that way sage, ONS, UKHSA and any other incompetent UK health agency!!!!! Including all GPs witnessing the severe injuries for everyone who took the Koolaid!
Covid and “long-covid” are NOT V’s. They are r*diation illness from the biooweapon they named “5G” to fool people. We are ALL suffering from radiation illness right now if you take a meter and measure it. Using a cell phone alone is super-high radiation.
[…] Via https://expose-news.com/2024/09/16/scientists-warn-risks-blood-transfusions-from-covid-vaccinated/ […]
[…] Via https://expose-news.com/2024/09/16/scientists-warn-risks-blood-transfusions-from-covid-vaccinated/ […]
Oops, they seem to have neglected to mention the most important components in the blood of the ‘covid’ shot-injected…NANOTECHNOLOGY/NANOBOTS!!!!!
The problem in Australia with 90-94% of the population having at least one jab of the Mrna gene therapy..spike producing injection,how do you find a blood donor who has not been compromised and do the appropriate authorities even care and are not screening.
The only people who care about the contamination of the blood supply are the unvaccinated, and this is a small number.
The people I feel sorry for are the unjabbed who may need blood or blood products for various reasons and cannot find any from unjabbed individuals and don’t know how to even ask the question or are unable due to physical impairment.
If the 90-94% is a true and accurate figure Australia is facing a bleak future indeed.
I asked Aus Red cross almost 3 Years ago about contaminated blood… They do Not screen vaccinated blood donors (which is most of the population you outline
One can have their own blood stored for such an emergency.
The use of autologous blood is one option for those having scheldured operations, not a option for emergency procedure or some cancer treatments such as leukemia.
[…] https://expose-news.com/2024/09/16/scientists-warn-risks-blood-transfusions-from-covid-vaccinated/ […]
[…] 17 Sept. 2024: Scientists warn of risks of Blood Transfusions from COVID-19 Vaccinated people: https://expose-news.com/2024/09/16/scientists-warn-risks-blood-transfusions-from-covid-vaccinated/ • Doctors by the Hundreds Testify of CV-19 Vaccine Hoax | Politics | Before It’s News […]
[…] Zdroj […]
[…] · Tues. 17 Sept. 2024: Scientists warn of risks of Blood Transfusions from COVID-19 Vaccinated people: https://expose-news.com/2024/09/16/scientists-warn-risks-blood-transfusions-from-covid-vaccinated/ […]
[…] · Tues. 17 Sept. 2024: Scientists warn of risks of Blood Transfusions from COVID-19 Vaccinated people: https://expose-news.com/2024/09/16/scientists-warn-risks-blood-transfusions-from-covid-vaccinated/ […]
[…] Zdroj […]
[…] https://expose-news.com/2024/09/16/scientists-warn-risks-blood-transfusions-from-covid-vaccinated/ […]
[…] recent pre-print study by a team of Japanese researchers has ignited a heated debate within the medical community, revealing serious risks associated with […]
[…] News)—A recent pre-print study by a team of Japanese researchers has ignited a heated debate within the medical community, revealing serious risks associated with […]
[…] recent pre-print study by a team of Japanese researchers has ignited a heated debate within the medical community, revealing serious risks associated with […]
[…] étude pré-imprimée récente par une équipe de chercheurs japonais a déclenché un débat houleux au sein de la communauté médicale, révélant de graves risques associés aux transfusions sanguines prélevées sur des personnes ayant reçu des vaccins contre la COVID-19. L’étude met en évidence six domaines clés où les jabs COVID détruisent la continuité et la biochimie du sang humain. L’étude a remis en question la sécurité de l’utilisation de ce sang dans les procédures médicales. […]
[…] News)—A recent pre-print study by a team of Japanese researchers has ignited a heated debate within the medical community, revealing serious risks associated with […]
[…] News)—A recent pre-print study by a team of Japanese researchers has ignited a heated debate within the medical community, revealing serious risks associated with […]
[…] News)—A recent pre-print study by a team of Japanese researchers has ignited a heated debate within the medical community, revealing serious risks associated with […]
[…] News)—A recent pre-print study by a team of Japanese researchers has ignited a heated debate within the medical community, revealing serious risks associated with […]
[…] Ghislaine Maxwell; Mayor Adams; crooked cops; cop crime; people crime; nanotech vaccine particles; vaccines & blood; no heat for seniors in UK; climate changes around the world; beaches and hospital waste; Lebanon; […]
[…] – Scientists warn of risks of Blood Transfusions from COVID-19 Vaccinated people […]
[…] A recent pre-print study by a team of Japanese researchers has ignited a heated debate within the medical community, revealing serious risks associated with blood transfusions taken from individuals who have received COVID-19 vaccinations. The study highlights six key areas where COVID jabs destroy the continuity and biochemistry of human blood. The study has called into question the safety of using such blood in medical procedures. […]
Zengers’ very popular interview with Dr. Stefan Lanka from 1998 talks about the problems with blood transfusions – they are dangerous. https://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/mcinterviewsl.htm This article is worth reading in full, because it gives a good idea of the inbred corruption of medicine – it is a militarized weapon used against the population and especially against certain groups of “undesirable” people, which the establishment does not like and is trying to harm and get rid of.
Here are some of the important paragraphs:
When I was absolutely sure of everything I have told so far, I made it public. I was invited to many conferences on marine biology and biology, and at each of them I presented my own data. I took every opportunity to speak out against HIV and soon realized that since I was eliminating HIV as an explanation for AIDS and was not able to replace it with something else, and not being able to explain what was going on under the label “HIV,” I had to be on the lookout and find those people who were able to explain what was going on.
At first, of course, some of Peter Duesberg’s publications helped me a lot, because he was an authority who questioned a lot of things, and that helped me. I translated some of his articles into German and published them in a small publishing house. But then, over time, I met other specialists, including Heinrich Kremer, the well-known German doctor, former medical director of the Federal Clinics for Drug Addiction in Germany, who helped me understand what was really going on.
As he was responsible for the introduction of the hepatitis B vaccine in Germany and used it on his patients, Dr. Kremer investigated the hepatitis B vaccines that were on the market. He found that the American vaccine, the hepatitis B vaccine, was produced from serums donated by gay men in New York City between 1978 and 1980. So, as he knew, there was a minority of these men who had a lot of sex and therefore had had a lot of sexually transmitted diseases. So he was afraid to use this vaccine and instead used the French vaccine, which was produced from blood donations from the general population of France.
But in 1983 the German government forced him not to use this vaccine anymore. They said that the French vaccine was poisoned by the “AIDS virus” – at a time when no one spoke positively of an “AIDS virus” – but the American vaccine was fine. He knew, or had been warned, that this had nothing to do with science, but with the fact that the German medical system, in some parts of Germany, is practically a colony of the American system.
Shortly thereafter, in 1984, he was told to deliver frozen blood samples from his patients to the newly founded AIDS Center in Berlin to be tested for the “AIDS virus.” Before he took the blood, he checked the tests for the accuracy and reliability of the HIV antibody test, and realized that this test is not capable of detecting the virus. It is not capable of saying yes or no, whether you are infected or not. It is only capable of saying whether you have a higher or lower amount of antibodies. This is how the HIV antibody test was and is designed.
Zengers: My understanding is that when you do an antibody test that is really useful, like the antibody test for syphilis, you get a high or low antibody reaction, and it is a certain multiple of how many times you dilute the original sample and still get the reaction. In this way, you not only know that the infection is present, but also how the immune system is responding to it.
Dr. Lanka: I am absolutely sure that no antibody test in medicine has an absolute meaning. Especially in the HIV antibody test, it is clear that the antibodies that are detected in the test are present in all people. Some people have them in higher concentrations and others in lower concentrations, but only when you reach a very high level of antibodies, much higher than in any other antibody test, are you considered to be “positive.” This is a contradiction in terms because in other antibody tests, the lower the antibody level, the higher the risk of symptomatic infection. But with HIV they say you are “positive” only when you have reached a very high level of antibodies. Below this level, you are said to be negative.
Zengers: This is what Dr. Roberto Giraldo was talking about when he spoke to H.E.A.L. in San Diego. He said that when they do the HIV antibody test they dilute the sample to 1/400 of its original concentration, and if they didn’t do that, all the antibodies would be negative.
The samples would test positive.
Dr. Lanka: That’s it. How ridiculous. Dr. Kremer already knew this in 1984. He was very concerned about the fate of his patients, because in 1984 politicians asked him to put these already stigmatized “HIV-positive” patients in quarantine, i.e. separate them from the others. He said no, because there was no infectious entity there. He knew that everyone who suffered from chronic active hepatitis or had been vaccinated against hepatitis B would test “HIV-positive.” So he knew that there was no infection in his hospital.
He informed the media, who went to his hospital to find out, in great detail. He told them all the tests. And the same journalists, in talk shows, in Der Spiegel [one of Germany’s largest and most popular magazines] for example, published exactly the opposite. So he knew that it had all been intentional from the beginning. They were playing war. They all wanted to have a plague of blood and sex, contrary to the evidence he presented to them. So he knew that AIDS was built on misconceptions. He was dealing with it at the highest political level. They told him, off the record, that they knew about it, that they didn’t care, that it was about how to deal with the drug problem and the homosexuals. They even tried to kill him, and they didn’t succeed. He had a good intuition and got out of his car before the tire burst. Afterwards, a minister who had great respect for him for his work with prisoners and drug addicts told him that the German government was conducting secret psychological research to prove that he was mentally ill and that they were keeping him in his position only because they considered him at risk of suicide. When he found out about this, he left his high-ranking position because he could not remain silent about it. That did not fit with his ethics.
I also met the Swiss professor Alfred Hässig, founder of the Swiss blood donation system and one of the first to extract blood products to make plasma to treat chronic diseases. By becoming his colleague and a very close friend, I learned a lot about the entire blood production industry and the criminal energy behind it. In March 1996, in Bern [the capital of Switzerland], Hässig, Kremer and I met for the first time.
It also became clear what was happening in the field of hepatitis. It was not a virus. Of course, there is the possibility of enriching certain types of proteins in blood products, which then cause severe autoimmune reactions, but only in very stressed people, never in people who are not. When they learned to extract these proteins from blood products or to dilute them, there are no more liver problems. I learned this through him.
Zengers: Are you saying that all forms of hepatitis are not infectious, or just some of them?
Dr. Lanka: No, there is no such thing as infectious hepatitis.
Zengers: So there is no hepatitis virus either.
Dr. Lanka: Yes. Hässig always fought to make sure that blood products were produced only on the basis of a small group of donors who were young and healthy. The industry started producing blood products on the basis of commercial blood donations, using a large number of blood samples, pooling them all into one big pool, because then it was much cheaper to get all the various types of products.
Zenger’s: In this country, the situation is even worse because blood donations are one of the main ways for homeless people to stay alive. As a result, we are taking much of our blood supply from people in society who have the most unhealthy lifestyles.
Dr. Lanka: I know all the details. Here’s what I’m going to tell you. Professor Hässig once met with the person responsible for the industrial blood product production industry, and once, when this person was drunk while visiting the Fiji Islands after a conference in Australia, this person told Professor Hässig that they would soon destroy the state blood production units, based on voluntary blood donations, because it is much cheaper for them to produce their blood products by going to Third World countries: they are already there in all the prisons of dictators in South America and elsewhere.
When Hässig heard about this, he called some of his friends – and of course Hässig was the most important person in the blood business – and at that time there were some non-corrupt people in the WHO (World Health Organization). So, in an emergency meeting, at short notice so that the industry would not have time to corrupt the members who decided on these issues, they decided that The WHO position would be that plasma production would not be allowed in the Third World – because otherwise they would “bleed” the poor.
Now they are bleeding the poorest of the poor, and they are going to Mexico, near where we are sitting right now. To help the commercial blood products industry, the FDA [US Food and Drug Administration] has approved that a single person can donate up to 50 units of plasma a year. That means you can come twice a week to donate blood and liver plasma. And an elephant couldn’t survive that, right? That’s the situation and what they did when it was all going on was to change the way they treated haemophiliacs. It started in California.
Until 1969 it was forbidden to give clotting factors to haemophiliacs, unless they had internal bleeding. If they were given prophylactically, antibodies were produced because these blood products are so contaminated. In 1969, the industry started to convince some doctors (the first was a female doctor from California) to treat hemophiliac patients prophylactically with these clotting factors, and that’s how the industry made a lot of money. And of course, the bodies of these hemophiliacs produced a lot of antibodies against these products, which was already predicted. Since then they have had to use higher doses of clotting factors to compete with these antibodies and for these clotting factors to really work. They have to gradually increase the amount they inject.
Since then, this has been the biggest business in the blood industry. Nobody talks about it, but that’s why almost all hemophiliacs have contracted hepatitis. If such a high amount of foreign proteins and all the contaminants are injected, the liver, as a central metabolic organ, is stressed, resulting in liver inflammations. Many hemophiliacs died of hepatitis, and it was attributed to non-existent viruses.
[…] the paper outlines the six major concerns with blood products derived from gene vaccine recipients, Expose News […]
[…] Fonte: https://expose-news.com/2024/09/16/scientists-warn-risks-blood-transfusions-from-covid-vaccinated/ […]