|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The proposed Northern Ireland Public Health Bill is attempting to implement mandatory vaccinations.
UK solicitor Anna de Buisseret has written to the UK representative to the World Health Organisation’s (“WHO’s”) ethics group, questioning proposals to implement mandatory vaccinations when such a proposal violates both domestic and international civil and criminal laws, including the law of war, as well as medical ethics and morals.
She has requested that people ask their countries’ representatives on WHO’s ethics group the same.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Northern Ireland’s proposed Public Health Bill will replace the current Public Health Act (Northern Ireland) 1967. The Department of Health recently held a public consultation aimed at developing the new Bill for the region. The consultation was a two-stage process.
The initial consultation, held in September 2015, focused on reviewing the current 1967 Act and gathering feedback on its effectiveness. The consultation also explored the need for legislative reform and sought input on shaping future public health protection law in Northern Ireland.
The second consultation, launched in July 2024, was seeking views on specific policy proposals that will underpin the development of a new Public Health Bill. This consultation built on the recommendations from the 2015 review and incorporated lessons learned from recent public health emergencies. The second consultation was open for 12 weeks and closed on 27 September 2024. The consultation documents are available to read HERE.
The proposed Public Health Bill is centred around the “all hazards” approach. This “all hazards” approach includes “all infection and contamination that present, or could present, a significant harm to human health.”
Notably, the proposed Bill incorporates “contamination.” The focus of the 1967 Act is infectious diseases. However, according to the consultation documents, the proposed new Bill will encompass all “infection and contamination including biological, chemical and radiological, in addition to infectious diseases.”
Among others, the proposed Bill will “update certain powers around restrictions on employment, quarantine, isolation and medical examination.”
The Public Health Bill Consultation document doesn’t classify vaccination as a medical treatment. Why? Because the document states that imposing medical treatments will be prohibited. Vaccines, on the other hand, which the Bill classifies as prophylactic treatments, can be imposed. By not recognising vaccines as medical treatments, they are attempting to override people’s right of refusal, which is closely related to the right to informed consent which must be freely given.
The Northern Ireland ‘Public Health Bill Consultation document’ stated:
Restrictions/ emergency powers
In relation to a person, the regulations may impose a ‘special restriction or
requirement’ such as … require a person to vaccinated [sic] or to receive other prophylactic treatment.
144. Specific provision will be made prohibiting regulations that impose or enable the imposition of a requirement that a person undergoes medical treatment. Medical treatment does not include vaccination and other prophylactic treatment.
Limitations: Regulations imposing restrictions or requirements
Domestic Health Protection Regulations
172. Regulations that include provision imposing a requirement on persons to be vaccinated or to receive other prophylactic treatment must: provide for exemptions from that requirement; and include provision about how a person who is entitled to an exemption is to evidence that entitlement.
International Travel Regulations
178. Regulations made under this suite of provisions (international travel) may not include provision requiring a person to undergo medical treatment. Medical treatment does not include vaccination and other prophylactic treatment.
179. Regulations that include provision imposing a requirement on persons to be vaccinated or to receive other prophylactic treatment must: provide for exemptions from that requirement; and include provision about how a person who is entitled to an exemption is to evidence that entitlement.
Prophylactic treatments are medical treatments. The difference between therapeutic and prophylactic treatments and medications is that prophylactics are given to prevent disease or to stop it from getting worse. Prophylactic medicine includes medications that prevent an illness, a recurrence of a condition (migraines, seizures, etc.), birth control or preventative surgery. In some instances, it is the same drug used as a prophylactic and a therapeutic, and it is only the dose that differs. In the case of mRNA technology, whether the drug is prophylactic or therapeutic is not so clear.
Injections using mRNA technology are called “vaccines,” even though they are gene therapy and do not prevent disease as was the case with covid. It is claimed that there are mRNA “vaccines” to “prevent” infectious diseases, such as covid, and there are mRNA “vaccines” that are showing promising results to treat – not prevent – cancer. As the term “vaccines” is used loosely and can mean whatever they want it to mean, we can assume they would use “prophylactic” loosely as well.
For this article, we will assume they are not preparing to impose other prophylactics such as birth control – which is not out of the realm of possibility – and focus on what they deem to be prophylactic vaccines.
By classing some medical treatments as “prophylactic” they are attempting to put into law that they can impose (what they choose to classify as) “vaccines” on us – unless you are deemed to be “entitled to an exemption” and can provide evidence to the satisfaction of those who make up the exemption rules.
The imposing of vaccines on people both domestically and for international travel is a point that Anna de Buisseret raised in an email to the UK representative of the WHO’s ethics team.
On Sunday, de Buisseret tweeted images of an email to Michael Parker, the UK’s ethics representative to WHO. We’ve published both her comments in her tweet and her email below.
Michael Parker is the UK representative on the ethics team of the WHO.
I’ve therefore decided to email him to ask him to explain why mandatory vaccination has been proposed both during covid and since – given it prima facie breaches both domestic and international civil and criminal laws, (including the law of war), medical ethics and morals.
I will share his response once he replies – if he does.
May I ask that others ask their country’s representative the same question: we will then be able to compare notes to see how they justify/explain themselves. [See the image at the end of the article for the members of WHO’s ethics team.]
If you value bodily autonomy and not being forced vaccinated, then we need to work together to place these decision-makers under scrutiny and to make our objections known.
Anna de Buisseret on Twitter, 6 October 2024
Email to Michael Parker from Anna de Buisseret
Dear Michael
I understand that you are very much involved with the ethics of pandemic management.
Please can you explain to me why mandatory vaccination has been proposed both during the covid pandemic and in various government documents (including the latest Northern Ireland public health consultation) – given it prima facie breaches both domestic and international civil and criminal laws (including the law of war) medical ethics and morals?
Governments justify their stance by stating that they are simply following guidelines of the likes of the WHO of which you are involved.
I’m a qualified Solicitor who has been advising people on their human rights and applicable laws and medical ethics and have been shocked and appalled by the proposals for mandatory health interventions including vaccinations.
Please also provide me with a copy of your CV so I can better understand how much law and medical ethics you have studied.
I look forward to hearing further from you.
Yours sincerely, Anna de Buisseret Solicitor
In her tweet, De Buisseret also provided the image below showing a list of all the members of the WHO Ethics & Covid Expert Group so people in other countries know who to ask why mandatory vaccination is being proposed.
Featured image: Health workers preparing to vaccinate members of the public at the SSE Arena, Belfast Live, 1 April 2021
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News
Mandatory………..I will happily murder anyone who ties to force jab me or my family………bring it on cunts, I will kill you all !
Taking a blood sample requires your permission, as a nurse once told me “after all, it is an assault on your body”. Also applicable to “vaccinations”, so anyone attempting to stick a needle in you without your permission is assaulting you, which definitely gives you the lawful right to defend yourself. Nuff said.
The rules of engagement have changed unless you have been in a 4 year coma and missed it..
I understand your energy. But please do not insult women by using your language, That is a derogatory and demeaning word.
I agree your sentiments entirely.
Anna is yet again performing a fantastic job in holding people accountable and challenging their insidious plans. Quite clearly the cabal are using multiple strategies to try and get their jibby made mandatory – it should surely be very obvious to people now why they want to happen in order to meet their 2030 net zero targets (we are the carbon reduction).
Absolutely NO compulsory 💉, my body my choice
Just wait till they hit the poor souls already vaxxed with the 3 ~ 1 minute pulses of 5G!:
https://rumble.com/v5hsswr-pfizer-insider-reveals-vaccinated-people-will-soon-start-bleeding-from-ever.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
Is it any wonder why the Greek word “pharmakeia” was translated “sorcery” in the book of Revelation?:
https://sumofthyword.com/2021/02/02/pure-from-the-blood-of-all-men/
what you said is SO TRUE………..unjabbed and stayin’ that way!
Hi Rob,
Those video’s were interesting from The People’s voice.
Thank you.
When are we going to get rid of these psychopathic parasites?
Once the day comes when someone tries to forcefully inject me with their crap it will be a micro evolutionary event of the survival of the fittest.
[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]
It’s for the enforcement of such harmful measures that all these fighting aged men have been brought into the country, so willingly assisted and supported by our governments.
Mandatory ONLY means suggested…it does not mean REQUIRED. If they insist………………….RUN!
They won’t hit the Deagle figures without mandatory jabs and a few wars.
Perhaps a little starvation and a race war as well.
That should leave a billion globally governed by 3k demonic psychopaths..
Hi Paul Watson,
Your explanation seems on the mark.
Thank you.
[…] Fuente Expose […]
Absolutely not this is a draconian law to put people into bondage! Stand up and fight for freedom and en masse reject the Bill as illegal and ignoring your right to choose for yourself and for your family!
its remarkably similar to the who pandemic treaty could it be there using northern ireland to test the waters before rolling out the treaty worldwide???..for much more information about the treaty be sure to check out the james roguski substack….also go to citizengo.org and scroll down till you find a petition….stop the who,s accelerated push to finalize the pandemic treaty..be sure to read it carefully to understand just how serious things really are….its a worldwide petition it can be signed and reshared widely worldwide from any country in the world including northern ireland but be warned dont waste your time resharing it or the details on gestapo book/twitter/you tube as you can be sure they will both censor and suppress it..however there are many other outlets that can and must be used including gab/gettr/substack/telegram/e mails/blogs to name but a few..it currently has over 269000 signatures it urgently needs many more and YOU can help in getting them firstly by signing it also reshare it widely with as many like minded people and groups as you possibly can and be sure to ask each one of them to do exactly the same
God bless the Irish people, stand up against oppression.
We all have free will and DO NOT SUBMIT, DO NOT ALLOW,
COME TOGETHER AND SAY NO. Love to all.
[…] https://expose-news.com/2024/10/08/bill-sets-into-law-mandatory-vaccines/ […]
Gene manipulation and human patenting.
total insanity! It appears they are possibly ‘testing’ this travesty on the Northern Irish, before trying to implement it in England??? The answer to that ‘test’ is NO! NO! NO!