|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
‘Vaxxed III: Authorised to Kill’ is a documentary film that explores the link between covid injections and harm, including death or serious injury.
The film is the latest instalment in the ‘Vaxxed’ series and features first-hand testimonies from parents, teenagers, families, medical professionals, whistleblowers, lawyers and people from various backgrounds, sharing their experiences with covid hospital protocols and vaccine outcomes.
Last month, after embarking on a nine-month journey across America to gather testimonies, Children’s Health Defense, in partnership with Informed Choice Washington, hosted screenings of the USA nationwide premier of ‘Vaxxed III: Authorised to Kill’.
On 4 October, Vaxxed III premiered online. It is free to view; all that is required is to sign up by entering a name and email address HERE.
If you are unable to watch the video above on Rumble, you can watch it on BitChute HERE.
You can watch ‘Vaxxed II: The People’s Truth’ (2021) HERE, which features interviews with doctors and parents who share their experiences and concerns about vaccine safety and the impact of vaccination on children’s health.
And you can watch ‘Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Catastrophe’ (2016) HERE, which explores the cover-up of a link between the measles, mumps, and rubella (“MMR”) vaccine and autism by the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”). The film was directed by Andrew Wakefield and features heart-wrenching stories from parents of vaccine-injured children, who claim that their children were healthy before vaccination but regressed into autism-like symptoms shortly after receiving the MMR vaccine. It also includes interviews with experts who question the safety and efficacy of vaccines, as well as those who have raised concerns about vaccine policy and the lack of transparency within the vaccine industry.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
Are there subtitles available for other languages?
No deep dives into patents? They’re the only place to look. Failure to do so is intentional.
No mention of the EUA requirements being violated and immunity lost?
They refuse to actually look.
I looked, even broke one patent down into Spreadsheets. 10703789 contains 552 other patent citations and a list of 1500 peptides, and this is 1 of 10 patents for listed by Moderna.
Gene C1ORF134 is listed, but just happened to be removed from gene banks. Luckily, I used to work in research and knew to look in archives for the alias names. C1ORF134 ended up being a secretory peptide in the P36 Deletion Syndrome region (cytogenic band) of chromosome 1.
Secretory peptides are used to release intracellular items outside of the cell. The secretory pathway is perhaps the most sensitive pathway in the body, and even minuscule alterations can result in full body metabolic syndromes.
There are things called ‘mimics’, which are engineered nanoparticles that mimic prions, yeast, bacteria and other pathogens. The UN production mentioned in the article doesn’t mention that, or anything else of real importance either.
Carbon nanotubes, avoiding and inhibiting the innate immune system, inhibiting VEGF, chimeric monkey-human antibodies, and a multitude of other concerns are in the patents. NONE, of which, was ever mentioned to the patient, and this is a direct violation of EUA requirements ii regarding conveyance of known risks.
They also fail to mention human patenting, which is utterly ridiculous; it was a national conversation when it was corn, but humans? Only because they purposely avoid it, and that should tell everyone something is up.
[…] Film je nejnovějším dílem série ‚Vaxxed‚ a obsahuje svědectví z první ruky od rodičů, teenagerů, rodin, lékařů, informátorů, právníků a lidí z různých prostředí, kteří sdílejí své zkušenosti s covidovými nemocničními protokoly a důsledky očkování. […]
Well, looks like the “conspiracy theorists” were spot on once again and we did told ya beforehand. But we were ridiculed and some of them even wished death upon us. The only ones I feel sorry for are the unfortunate dead and damaged children being offspring to ignorant parents.
People have deep religion-like believe to authoritys words, because they always represent absolute truth.
This episode has demonstrated how mind control works, how to create one and only opinion, and how to demonize people (conspiracy theorists) who are truth tellers.
We just tried to warn, sorry bout that.
This third sequel is a two hour long detailed video confirmation of what we said from the beginning.
But they didn’t listen to us so now we don’t have to listen to them. These kind of people enabling this crap have already wasted a couple of years of my life which I will never get back. They made their own sick bed and now they will have to lye in it preferable in silence.
Neither am I interested in paying for their disability in the same manner I don’t pay reparation to someone who touches a plate I repeatedly told them was hot.
And since they are so keen and eager to jump on experimental band-wagons, then government will soon have an other program that will take care of all their problems in one final cheap sweep.
Vaxxed III is an inspiring and very affecting documentary, but I feel I must point out that only the first 25% of it actually addresses the subject of jab injuries. The remaining three-fourths of the movie are in fact entirely concerned with the pre-jab-era (year 2020) mistreatment of patients diagnosed with Covid, and not with subsequent jab injuries at all. These two, distinct phases of the C-19 debacle both indeed expose the appalling corruption of what is now essentially a sickness industry, but while the first 26 minutes expectedly highlight jab injuries and deaths against a backdrop of obscene pro-jab propaganda, the remaining 90 minutes are about the ethically corrosive effect of the profit motive in the pre-jab Covid phase: ivermectin, remdesivir, ventilators, and such. The anti-vax message tacked on the end thus feels a little out of place.
[…] ‘Vaxxed III: Authorised to Kill’ is available to watch online for free […]
A pop up appears in the middle of the video and when you try to click on it to see the video you get taken to another page. Then you have to start over again with the video, watch ads, etc. I’m not bothering.