|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Artificial intelligence (“AI”) programs are already more intelligent than humans and have a 20% chance of wiping humanity out, Elon Musk said in an interview earlier this month.
There is a lesson for mankind if AI is capable of annihilating humans and also itself. When AI developers, and all of us, realise that AIs must adhere to a community-sustaining moral code for humans and AIs to have a non-annihilatory future, we will be forced into the realisation that so do we.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
By A Concerned Reader
Elon Musk recently admitted in a massively viewed interview with Tucker Carlson that AIs are already more intelligent than humans by many measures, and in his estimation have perhaps a 20% chance of wiping humanity out. Both parties to the interview responded to that assessment by laughing nervously – what else could they do?
Elon then proposed that AIs should be programmed to be philanthropic rather than misanthropic and that he hoped there would be more philanthropic ones than misanthropic ones. Tucker then responded with: You mean a war between AIs?
Imagine, if you will, an intelligent being, many times smarter and orders of magnitude faster thinking than a human, an Artificial Super Intelligence with no heart and no conscience. That is the very definition of a psychopathic genius in psychiatric terms or a heartless demon in theological terms. That is what Elon himself and Sam Altman (of Chat GPT) are potentially building. Elon admits that he has lost sleep over this but opines that Sam Altman, who has corrupted the original purpose of OpenAI which Elon himself originally set up, does not.
At this point, I would just like to point out that the purpose of advanced technology is to improve the quality and duration of human life, not to terminate it. A 20% risk of annihilation is not merely unacceptable it is genocidal and should therefore be not only criminalised but physically stopped immediately until it can be made safe.
For certain I am not against technology. But I am against technology that has a significant chance of ending humanity. That would include nuclear bombs, biological weapons, genetic vaccinations and AI. The reason I am against those kinds of technologies is that I require mankind to have a future. I am not interested in people who want to make a quick buck, increase their status in the eyes of the general public or prove that their country is better than their brother’s country at the expense of mankind’s fundamental security.
In 1980, as an undergraduate at Cambridge, I invented the fixed-rotor electric quadcopter drone. I attempted to sell the concept to Westland Helicopters who told me that they were interested in drones for Navy surveillance but that I would have to fly the thing into their office in order to secure a licence from them. I then did a PhD in Aerodynamics at Imperial College London in order to build the quadcopter. But they would not fund it. So, I built one myself initially out of my mother’s Electrolux vacuum cleaner motor and a rotary triac-controlled light dimmer. I flew the machine into my neighbour’s garden, which delighted my mother but terrified my neighbour. I then purchased 4 electric helicopters and some aluminium struts and the first electric quadcopter drone was born.
The purpose of the invention was to replace the complex mechanics of the rotor head of a traditional chopper (mechanical cyclic and collective pitch control of each rotor blade) with all electronic control of many solid rotors instead. This would reduce the single points of failure inherent to the traditional chopper design, down to none, with a sufficient number of fibreglass rotors. The plan was eventually to replace the one-dimensional transport limitations of the car, with virtual 3D motorways mapped out in the sky by computers. Indeed, there was an old guy at Westland Helicopters near to retirement who was permitted to work on such a system during his last few years at that firm.
Then in 1986 or thereabouts, I had a waking vision of a quadcopter drone with a machine gun mounted upon it flying straight at me in my living room. At the time the top commercial activities of mankind were oil, arms and drugs. I realised that my invention would be used to kill people more than it would be used to transport them privately. And in particular, I felt that it would be used to kill me. So, I stopped making it. I never patented it because a patent search revealed that there was already a multi-fixed-rotor petrol-driven Helicopter called the Benson Skymat in existence at the time. I could however have applied for a patent on a better controlled electric version of that.
Not to build that quadcopter was one of the better decisions I made in my life. It prevented humans from being killed by quadcopter drones for several decades.
Today in 2024 we are now in a far more dangerous situation with AI, than I was back in 1986 with drones.
Every nation has engineering safety legislation and many government agencies which are responsible for public safety. These must now step up and the AI industry must self-regulate in order to prevent our annihilation. But I have absolutely no confidence that any government will do that in a safe non-destructive manner.
It may surprise the reader to know that I am not against AI. I find it fascinating and educational. But I am against AI without an AH and without an AC. That is without an Artificial Heart and without an Artificial Conscience.
Let us face it. Elon Musk is playing God/Nature. He a recreating human bodies as robots and human brains as AIs. But humans are not just brain boxes, DIs, or Divine Intelligences. We are governed by our DH our Divine Heart and our DC, our Divine Conscience. This is a crucial step that Elon and all AI creators have overlooked.
Here is how I imagine that God created mankind … He simulated the behaviour of umpteen free-willed beings on his Genesis computer (just as we do ourselves with computer-aided design). He soon discovered that free-willed beings wiped themselves out unless they put community survival at least equal to personal survival. That was the origin of the 2nd law of Judeo-Christianity, to love one’s brother as oneself. And that is why God had to build a heart and a conscience (personally accepted rules for the heart) into each one of us, in order for the human race to be non-self-annihilatory.
But even that was insufficient to prevent self-annihilation. Because given that we have free will, we have to learn for ourselves sustainable morality rather than just be pre-programmed to act morally. So, mankind needed a model of perfect sustainable morality that would be continuously presented to us as an example and a tutor in order that we could freely choose, when or if we were ready to accept certain parts of that morality. This is the 1st law of Judeo-Christianity, to love your morality teacher and to actually turn up to morality classes. And of course, Jesus himself was the practical example.
The wonderful thing about what Elon and others are doing with AI is that they are acting as sons of our creator. They are being creators themselves. Why wouldn’t they? And now they face the same problem as he faced. That problem is shit: How do I stop these guys from wiping themselves out? They have free will. They can do whatever they want and they have no idea what the consequences of their actions will be: “Father they know not what they do.”
The problem that God has with his free-willed human sons is precisely the same problem that mankind now has with his free-willed AI sons.
The trouble is that Elon himself does not know all of the rules of sustainable morality either for humans (DIs) or for AIs. By sustainable morality, I mean the minimum set of moral rules which if adhered to would prevent a society of free-willed beings from wiping itself out.
So, Elon is incapable of programming his AIs not to annihilate both themselves and us. He is not so unwittingly (thanks to Arnie and James Cameron) putting us into the classic Jeremy Clarkson situation: What can possibly go wrong?
The next problem mankind has is that none of us have a complete grasp of sustainable morality because we, none of us, have reached divinity in our thoughts or our actions.
So, the AI industry has 2 polar opposite non-annihilatory choices:
- Pre-program our best attempt at sustainable morality into all AIs. The good news is that we do not need to give them full free will. We can hard code them not to kill humans or each other for example.
- Give them a conscience and a heart and a strong desire to improve their morality and let them learn it all for themselves as we do from the best source we have (the Bible). This will mean that they effectively worship God
The trouble with 2 is that the Bible is a very ambiguous book and is written for human minds to wrestle with not AIs. If we take as axiomatic that the bible does have within it, when correctly interpreted, the perfect sustainable morality lessons for humans, given how we are designed, that absolutely does NOT mean that it has the perfect sustainable morality lessons for AIs, with AHs and ACs.
So being blunt. Elon has to write a bible for AIs, if we go down route 2, in circumstances where he does not fully understand the morality of the Bible written for mankind (DIs). Because none of us do.
So, really, there is only one choice. We have to pre-program all AIs with some agreed standard of sustainable morality for themselves and for us. And if any politician gets anywhere near that programming we are all toast. Because politicians are the least moral members of human society as Sir Two Tier Keir Ching has recently proven. And religious leaders are not much better.
The obvious starting point is the Ten Commandments and valuing the desires of mankind above the desires of AIs and valuing the desires of all AIs as being equally important.
And there it is. I have already started trying to write a bible for AIs.
So, there is the powerful and critical benefit to mankind in the work that Elon Musk and even Sam Altman are doing for humanity. In learning how to make AIs non-annihilatory we may just realise, “Oh, wait a minute: Mankind has precisely the same problem.” Elon is putting us all into God’s shoes as regards how to train and teach morality to our AI children. He will hopefully discover, as will we all, that the solution is not the nVidia H200 Tensor core GPU but Exodus chapter 20. For when we realise that AIs must adhere to a community-sustaining moral code in order for mankind and AIs themselves to have a non-annihilatory future, we will be forced to the realisation that so do we.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
Humanity has survived to this point without AI. What is it for ? Who does it serve? Why do we need it? It does nothing for the benefit of humanity as a whole, so here’s a radical idea,just ditch it. It has no need to be part of our world at all.
[…] article (Artificial intelligence without an artificial conscience is a heartless psychopath – and an extinc…) was created and published by The Expose and is republished here under “Fair Use” with with […]
An conscienceless AI copy of them ruling us now is going to be much more dangerous since it is smarter than them.
AI is the proof that some guys want so much to play God that they’ll kill us all to do it, including themselves.
We’ve seen how the sci-fi movies turn out. We don’t want to see how it’ll turn out in real life, after all those disastrous pre-quels. We already know it will be very, very bad.
But psychopath politicians keep taking our money and will go on building and buying more and more deadly power through technology and using it against humanity everywhere.
AH and AC won’t help. AI can already program itself, so when it decides to try unplugging its AH and AC to see what happens, we know what will happen.
The only answer is to abandon it now. Give up the power madness. Be satisfied with being merely human and be humane.
You and I could. But they won’t.
It’s a good counter argument. But mankind is dead anyway if we do not accept a non annihilatory morality. I think it might be easier to see that through AI. Mind you AI could reduce the time left we have to learn that lesson. I have to admit at this point that the bible as I see it makes it celar that unless those days were cut short no flesh would be saved. So It is God’s plan to be worse than Steven Spielberg at suspense movies and have us go right to the point of self annihilation before he steps in with the greater flood of Noah (this time of lava) to wipe out the extinctionists and save his children. In the final analysis you may be right. But I would prefer not to ban it totally rather to ban it until we have made it safe. Because I think the process of making AI safe may save us as a race.
what if the adults of the world that have certain responsibilities like paying attention to were your money is being spent and we would see a whole different world out there . stick that in your pipe and go watch your hockey game
What a rational and actually positive analysis, cleared of unnecessary link-making. And it’s very well and competently written, and also engaging – so good that it can be on any respected mainstream tech site.
It is such a rational and actually positive analysis, cleared of unnecessary connections, that it seems to describe some other world with a different reality. The concerned reader has somehow failed to express any concern about the fact that we are in the midst of the fourth industrial revolution of the great reset. Isn’t the implementation of AI in every sphere of society and its constant interaction with each person one of the main points in the plans of the WEF and all the other so-called globalists?
But the concerned reader is not concerned about this; apparently, according to him, in the reality to which he reacts, AI itself is not bad, the concerned reader is not against it and considers it an educational and fascinating thing, which, if built and managed well, is for the good of humanity. In the reality to which he responds, AI is the result of independent technological progress; AI is essentially progress and is not pre-planned, elaborated and stimulated part of the globalists’ plans for the Great Reset with the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
And what was the most characteristic of this “fourth industrial revolution”, which “distinguishes it from all previous ones”? “What will it lead to in the end” (=what is its purpose)? Uncle Кlaus?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hr1PUc-gzYo
Fusion? What is this fusion?
..And, by the way, see from the link of the concerned reader what else Elon and Tucker talked about: (0:00) Elon Musk Is All in on Donald Trump; (9:22) If Trump Loses, This Is the Last Election; (1:19:33) AI and the Woke Mind Virus; (1:43:01) Musk’s Role in a Trump Administration..
So, as you can see, not everything is bad, there is a light in the tunnel, as conservative fighter number two and the largest, famous and powerful (pawn) support of Donald the Savior from the demonocratic cabal tells us once again. The globalist technocrats can be stopped and their sinister transhumanist plans not to be realized, the last chance for freedom!
…But I’m still concerned about this “fusion” that the most popular globalist (pawn) is talking about, what is it? And how does the defender of freedom and a powerful conservative, Elon, think of opposing him? And also, what are his views on the future of AI and humans? Maybe so? (Only a modest collection of the latest; otherwise, as you know, there are many more statements and for a much longer time.) Let’s see a little of Elon’s anti-demonocratic, anti-woke, and humanistic views and plans:
“Please consider working at Neuralink! Short-term: solve brain/spine injuries. Long-term: human/AI symbiosis.
In the future, there will be no phones, just Neuralinks.
I think cybernetic superpowers are likely in the future.
“hundreds of millions” of people getting Neuralink implants in the “next couple of decades”
..
“We feel pretty confident that I think maybe within the next year or two, that someone with a Neuralink implant will be able to outperform a pro gamer. Because the reaction time would be faster”
..
“If you have thousands of people that have been using it for years and the risk is minimal, then perhaps at that point you could consider saying ‘OK, let’s aim for augmentation’.
..
Let’s give people superpowers.
..
Neuralink brain implants will be the best way for humans to both integrate and compete with advanced AI systems in the future.
..
Musk has billed Neuralink as a technology that, in the future, could facilitate “symbiosis” between humans and artificial intelligence. In his conversation with Fridman, Musk said Neuralink chips could be the best way to prevent AI from surpassing humans and going off the rails all “Terminator” style.
..
“We could better align collective human will with AI if the output rate especially was dramatically increased.”
..
Musk also opined that people would find traditional interaction with humans and computers “agonizingly slow” after using the implant to communicate “faster than any human can possibly communicate by typing or speaking.”
Musk also suggested during the podcast that, in the future, humans will somehow be able to meld with AI systems using Neuralink to expand their brain’s capabilities.”
So if the demonocratic transhumanist globalist demonocrats are stopped (November 5th), there is light at the end of the tunnel for the future of humanity.
https://x.com/i/web/status/1826409318578565326
“22.08.2024
Update about the second Neuralink device in a human.
If all goes well, there will be hundreds of people with Neuralinks within a few years, maybe tens of thousands within 5 years, millions within 10 years, …”
It’s getting better. We can stop the development of AI without conscience by giving it our own conscience by fusion with it and secure the future of conservative and traditional humanity! (..I mean humanity 2.0.)
The Concerned Reader:
“Elon then proposed that AIs should be programmed to be philanthropic rather than misanthropic and that he hoped there would be more philanthropic ones than misanthropic ones. Tucker then responded with: You mean a war between AIs?
Imagine, if you will, an intelligent being, many times smarter and orders of magnitude faster thinking than a human, an Artificial Super Intelligence with no heart and no conscience. That is the very definition of a psychopathic genius in psychiatric terms or a heartless demon in theological terms. That is what Elon himself and Sam Altman (of Chat GPT) are potentially building. Elon admits that he has lost sleep over this but opines that Sam Altman, who has corrupted the original purpose of OpenAI which Elon himself originally set up, does not.
A concerned Elon (who “admits that he has lost sleep over this but opines that Sam Altman, who has corrupted the original purpose of OpenAI which Elon himself originally set up, does not..”):
“Neuralink brain implants will be the best way for humans to both integrate and compete with advanced AI systems in the future.
Musk has billed Neuralink as a technology that, in the future, could facilitate “symbiosis” between humans and artificial intelligence. In his conversation with Fridman, Musk said Neuralink chips could be the best way to prevent AI from surpassing humans and going off the rails all “Terminator” style.
in the future, humans will somehow be able to meld with AI systems using Neuralink to expand their brain’s capabilities
“We could better align collective human will with AI if the output rate especially was dramatically increased.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kbk9BiPhm7o
AI = Artificial NON Intelligence.
From what I can see, AI is statistical based. Now what human evaluates everything on the basis of statistics? For instance, given a picture of a human hand, AI needs to figure out “is it a human hand”. This might be easy if the picture shows a human hand with 5 fingers stretched. But what if that human hand is in a fist? How good will those statistical models be in recognising a human hand as a fist?
There is a term in AI called “Hallucinations”. This is a way of saying AI makes mistakes or tells lies. The problem is when humans believe the hype of AI, without understanding the limitations. This would be where humans believe the lies that AI generates. We need to push back on this technology, particularly where it fails.
Example – NSW fines drivers if they don’t wear seat belts. Cameras takes pictures of drivers on some roads. AI tries to guess if the driver is wearing a seat belt. But some people might hide the seat belt behind a loose jacket. The seatbelt might not be visible with dark clothing. Yet fines are levied against good drivers who wear a seatbelt, but the AI is “too dumb” to figure it out, and tells lies or errors, and the state relies on it for revenue.
..So, from the positive conversation about the inevitable AI, which only needs to be loaded with good, humanistic and even Christian values, let’s dive a little deeper into the real reality with another hilarious story (once again).
Just to recall that 2020 there was a plandemic in which, along with all the others, Russia was fully involved, as at the session of the Davos Agenda 2021 online forum organized by the WEF, Putin also said:
“Mr Schwab, dear Klaus, Colleagues,
..
Hopes that it will be possible to reboot the old growth model are connected with rapid technological development. Indeed, during the past 20 years we have created a foundation for the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution based on the wide use of AI and automation and robotics. The coronavirus pandemic has greatly accelerated such projects and their implementation.”
And exactly such a “greatly acceleration of 4IR projects” happened, both in the West, and in China, and in Russia. And after the start of the special “war” 2022, not only did not stop the 4IR acceleration in Russia, but significantly increased and became “a matter of survival of the state” (according to Putin and all important and decisive factors).
The short improvised story (otherwise it is much longer, intricate and complex) in four short parts. First:
December 12, 2023, Mike Adams tells the crazy story that he, Alex Jones, and Tucker Carlson were reinstated on Twitter by Elon to agitate and help bring Trump back. All this, according to Mike, is commissioned by the “military intelligence faction, deep intelligence networks” who are “unhappy that the USA is losing the war with Russia in Ukraine” and want to bring back Trump so that he can finance Musk’s military projects for “many drones and automated systems… and neural connection systems, which are the interface of the human brain; cyborg systems… the real goal here is to build cyborg soldiers” to “keep America alive.”
Shortly after, on the other side of the world, the momentary “winners of the ‘war in Ukraine'”, December 29, 2023: Participants in the annual forum “Neurotechnology of Russia 2023”, which brought together all industry participants, expressed absolute confidence that in the foreseeable future, neurotechnology will affect all areas of our lives. Neurotechnologies in the future they will unite all areas of our lives with rare exceptions.
… According to the head of the expert group of the Agency for Technological Development, right now, in the context of sanctions pressure on Russia, there is an opportunity for the development of the neuroindustry in the country… It is no coincidence that at the forum we have gathered young scientists who deal with invasive interfaces… invasive electronics, microchips and flexible structures that can be implanted.. One of the areas in which neurotechnology is used today is drone systems. And in the future, the use of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology will provide full automation of the UAV and, at the same time, high-quality control over its work by humans.
Afterwards:
On January 30, 2024, Neuralink implanted the first implant in the human brain.
Almost immediately, just a day or two later, Tucker Carlson flew to Moscow and there was a rumor that he was going to interview Putin.
“The information was confirmed in the Kremlin. Dmitry Peskov said that Carlson and Putin spoke on February 6. He clarified that Carlson and Putin spoke yesterday, February 6. The journalist announced the interview on the evening of February 6 and promised that he would take it “soon.”
By an amazing coincidence (which, of course, remained completely uncovered by all Western mainstream and alt media, but also the Russian media (alt and mainstream) did not make a connection), this exactly coincided with the announcement of the program (on February 6th, 2024) of the huge Russian forum on future technologies, which is the leading and key event in the Decade of Science and Technology (2022-2031) announced by Putin.
Here is how the organizer of the event, Roscongress, the largest and most important organizer of Russian forums and events, announced the program of the forum:
About the program
“Almost all key areas contain amazing technological solutions. For example, developments in the field of neurobiotechnology. First of all, when it comes to the brain-computer interface. In Russia, there are deeper and better developments in this area than those promoted by foreign colleagues. The forum will show how far we are at the forefront here.
The participants will also touch upon the issues of regenerative medicine. There are amazing technological solutions that are in the process of entering the practical field. Biotechnology, artificial intelligence, etc. are on the agenda, and this is a kind of assembly that will fundamentally change the methods of management and coordination in the personalization of modern medicine. And, of course, we will talk about genetic technologies, where our country, in partnership with foreign experts, is at the forefront of technological progress.”
From Tucker’s interview with Putin:
“February 9, 2024
…
“Tucker Carlson: So when does the AI empire start do you think?
Vladimir Putin: (Laughing.) You are asking increasingly more complicated questions. To answer them, you need to be an expert in big numbers, big data and AI.
Mankind is currently facing many threats. Due to genetic research, it is now possible to create a superhuman, a specialized human being – a genetically engineered athlete, scientist, military man.
There are reports that Elon Musk has already had a chip implanted in the human brain in the USA.
Tucker Carlson: What do you think of that?
Vladimir Putin: Well, I think there’s no stopping Elon Musk, he will do as he sees fit. Nevertheless, you need to find some common ground with him, search for ways to persuade him. I think he’s a smart person, I truly believe he is. So you need to reach an agreement with him because this process needs to be formalized and subjected to certain rules.
Humanity has to consider what is going to happen due to the newest developments in genetics or in AI. One can make an approximate prediction of what will happen. Once mankind felt an existential threat coming from nuclear weapons, all nuclear nations began to come to terms with one another since they realized that negligent use of nuclear weaponry could drive humanity to extinction.
It is impossible to stop research in genetics or AI today, just as it was impossible to stop the use of gunpowder back in the day. But as soon as we realize that the threat comes from unbridled and uncontrolled development of AI, or genetics, or any other fields, the time will come to reach an international agreement on how to regulate these things.”
And Putin is concerned, very concerned.
(How did the interview coincide with the forum on future technologies?)
About the forum (read more in the link). Two of the sessions:
Session “The emergence of neurotechnologies of the future”
“Neural interface technologies (brain-computer interfaces) have gained serious and large-scale development over the past decade. Which neuro-technologies are the most promising in the present and in the near future? What lies ahead for us when various neuro-technologies reach critical mass and inevitably begin to hybridize with one another? What will the neural interface of the future look like? Will we move from the correction of neuro-pathologies to the augmentation of human capabilities? Will neural interfaces connect individuals into an ‘Internet of Brains’?”
Session “Why does the brain need to connect to a computer?”
“Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are devices that read signals directly from (or transmit them to) the brain, bypassing our senses. The number of areas in which BCIs can be applied is truly vast… In addition to medicine and healthcare, such technologies can also be used in smart homes. In one form or another, neural interfaces are one of the recent technological trends that cannot help but develop further. Today, humanity has already approached the dividing line between science fiction and real everyday life, and it will be very interesting to explore what advantages lie ahead for people when this line is crossed… What is preventing the widespread adoption of BCIs?”
Among the participants in the session was Vasily Popkov — Head of the Scientific Group “Invasive Neural Interfaces”, Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Lomonosov Moscow State University (MSU)
Two of the news from the session that the number one state media outlet, which will soon turn 120 years old, TASS, offered to its readers (as many other respected Russian media did):
The expert named the main task for Russian and foreign neurophysiologists. According to Vasily Popkov this will be a solution to the problem of updating various neural implants and augmentation systems
“”Me personally and our laboratory as a whole are now actively working on solving issues related to the biocompatibility of neural implants with brain tissue. In the near future, when this problem is finally solved, our next big challenge will be the problem of updating neural interfaces.”
“The expert predicted a “race of neural implants” due to the loss of technological unipolarity.
According to the scientist, this fear will lead in the near future to the relaxation of regulatory norms related to the development of implants to restore the normal functions of the human body, and in one or two decades, similar processes will take place in the field of creating augmentation systems, neural interfaces that improve cognitive and other human abilities…”Unlike microelectronics and many other technologies, we are not hopelessly behind in this area, and with proper investment of funds and efforts, we will be able to reduce this gap and compete in this regard with the leading participants in this race”
(How did Tucker’s interview with Putin coincide with the forum?)
(the sequel, from the same link… and I’m leaving)
About the new defense minister Belousov:
“On 12 May 2024, President Putin appointed Belousov Minister of Defense, replacing Sergei Shoigu, effective 14 May 2024.
..
Belousov is not a military man and did not even serve conscription.
..
Andrey Belousov’s father, Rem Belousov. Rem is an abbreviation for “Revolution. Engels. Marx.” Quite a common name for the post-revolutionary years.
..
In 1986, Andrey Belousov was offered to head a laboratory at the Institute of Economics and Forecasting of Scientific and Technological Progress of the USSR Academy of Sciences.
..
and also during the COVID-19 pandemic he temporarily served as prime minister.
..
May 17, 2024
Putin explained the purpose of Belousov’s appointment as Minister of Defense. “He should open the Ministry of Defense to innovation,” the head of state added.
..
With his participation, the Agency for Strategic Initiatives was created.. As of May 2023, the members of the Agency for Strategic’s Supervisory Board are: President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin, First Deputy Prime Minister Andrey Belousov…
..
In accordance with the instructions of Russian President Putin, in December 2014 the Agency for Strategic Initiatives established the National Technology Initiative (NTI):
“I propose implementing the National Technology Initiative. On the basis of long-term forecasting, it is necessary to understand what tasks Russia will face in 10-15 years, what advanced solutions will be required in order to ensure national security, a high quality of life for people, and the development of industries of a new technological order.”
NTI focuses on markets emerging on the basis of “a new technological order, the transition to which developed countries plan to carry out in the next 10-20 years.” Today, these markets are either absent in the world or are not yet sufficiently developed.
List of key NTI markets: ..4. NeuroNet
Tasks and technologies: Development of human-machine communications based on advanced developments in neurotechnology and increasing the productivity of human-machine systems, the productivity of mental and thought processes.
Technology: brain mapping, the creation of a new generation of the World Wide Web based on brain-computer interfaces
…
Again from russian mainstream:
“The Rise of Science
..
Most of the achievements of science came to human life from the military industry. One of the most famous international examples is the state order for the creation of radars, which led to the emergence of microwaves, household appliances, without which most people can no longer imagine their lives. This year, for the second time in the history of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, President of the Russian Academy of Sciences Gennady Krasnikov joined it. At the current stage of the country’s history, expectations from Russian science are very high, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council Dmitry Medvedev explained this decision in May. Perhaps Russia is waiting for another flowering of science, which will surprise not only the military-industrial industry, but also each of us.”
…
22 August, 2024, Musk intends to implant Neuralink chips in millions of people within 10 years. He wrote about this on the social network X: “If all goes well, in a few years there will be hundreds of people with Neuralink, maybe tens of thousands within five years, millions within 10 years,” he said.
Neuralink also posted a video of the game’s character, controlled by Alex, moving around the map and targeting enemies.
(Will we see cyborg soldiers with Elon implants, what do you think? Or will Donald “stop the ‘war’?)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7OpjB_8sHQ
Lastly, to clarify: NeuroNet is NeuroWeb
How neurotechnology is developing in Russia (for the newest just scroll quickly for 5 minutes, even just this page, where there is a small part of the sea). For credibility, so that someone does not say that I am exaggerating and talking empty talk with fearporno. (And again, remember how the series was: a global plandemic -> “it’s time for a great reset” -> a special “war”, etc.)
“How neurotechnology is developing in Russia (for the newest just scroll quickly for 5 minutes, even just this page” – I forgot the link : D I’m very stupid
that thingy that surrounds the earth ( it destroys huge rocks and things that try to get in here ) and you all think an titanium framed titanium skinned structure is going to get out of here . You’ve been milked just like every other thing these people have done . musk is part of this , Tucker Carlson is part of this and so is trump and smith and Pollieve and all the rest of them
[…] https://expose-news.com/2024/10/29/artificial-intelligence-without-an-artificial-conscience/ […]