|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The media (persuaded by the drug industry and the medical establishment which are, sadly, much the same thing) often seems to believe that chemotherapy is the only way to treat cancer. They may be rich and powerful but they’re wrong.
And charities, which supposedly exist to care for patients, are too often simply part of the cancer industry, beholden to the international pharmaceutical companies which make billions out of selling drugs. In the global cancer industry, the charities largely provide marketing and public relations services while the drug companies control the research that is done.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Here is the preface from my new book: `What doctors won’t tell you about chemotherapy’.
Preface
The media (persuaded by the drug industry and the medical establishment which are, sadly, much the same thing) often seems to believe that chemotherapy is the only way to treat cancer. They may be rich and powerful but they’re wrong. The Guardian newspaper in the UK recently told their readers that “the damage to healthy tissues tends to be temporary” and “side effects usually disappear once the treatment is over.” If The Guardian studies the evidence in this book, they may like to reconsider that advice.
Information is the currency and capital for everything worthwhile we do. But there is more misinformation about cancer than just about anything else. Much of the misinformation is deliberate and corporate and there is more fraud, more confusion and more lying in this area of medicine than almost anywhere else. Charities, which supposedly exist to care for patients, are too often simply part of the cancer industry, beholden to the international pharmaceutical companies which make billions out of selling drugs which do little or no good and which are known to kill people. I don’t know of any cancer charity which doesn’t have links (usually financial) with big drug companies. This is, sadly, by no means unusual. When specific charities and patient associations were first formed, they were usually dedicated to caring and campaigning for patients but, sadly, charities and patient associations in all areas of medicine have been corrupted by the money which big drug companies have available for so-called marketing programmes. In the global cancer industry, the charities largely provide marketing and public relations services while the drug companies control the research that is done. When commercially inconvenient results are produced, they quickly suppress anything which might be financially damaging.
Cancer is not a single disease. It is a word which describes a great many quite different diseases. The one thing these diseases all have in common is that there is an uncontrolled and disorderly growth of abnormal cells. It is quite normal for cells to grow and to reproduce. Every minute, in every human body, an astonishing ten million cells divide. Usually, everything goes well. The cells divide in the right way and at the right time. But when a cell becomes a “cancer cell” it grows and divides at an abnormally rapid rate. These abnormal “cancer cells” destroy or push aside the normal, functioning cells. If the “cancer cells” are not stopped they may spread to other parts of the body and take up residence in other, different organs. “Cancer cells” may be carried around the body through the blood vessels or the lymph channels. When a cancer spreads and appears in another part of the body, the new growths are known as secondaries or metastases. Cancer can also spread by “crab-like” outgrowths (hence the name “cancer”).
Cancer is not the unknown, dark shrouded mystery killer that it is often thought to be. We do not know enough to recommend a lifestyle which will enable all individuals to avoid all cancers. But we know enough to make a difference. If we make the decision to avoid those factors which research has shown can lead to the development of cancer, and to do those things which can strengthen our defences against cancer, then I believe that we can dramatically influence our susceptibility to the disease and we can reduce the chances of a recurrence. We can’t stop it permanently but we can adjust the odds in our favour.
It is now widely accepted that many of the cancers which most commonly occur, develop because outside substances trigger some sort of reaction – and cancer development – in the body. It is no secret that cigarettes, sunshine, asbestos and X-rays can and do cause cancer – more so in susceptible individuals. But it is less widely known that fatty foods and meat cause cancer. And it is less well-known that green vegetables can provide some protection against cancer.
People get cancer through bad luck and inherited susceptibilities. But they also get it through ignorance – ignorance which has been deliberately sustained through commercial greed and political expediency. When businessmen, politicians and doctors know how to prevent 80 per cent of cancers but do nothing, it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that those cancer deaths are deliberate. Eight out of ten people who die from cancer have effectively been murdered in cold blood. If cancer can be described as a disease of choice, the choice is made for us by those whose sense of responsibility does not match their authority. For too many people the choice is made by politicians, businessmen and doctors who do not understand that with knowledge comes responsibility. (The uncaring nature of politicians, fuelled by ambition mixed with panic and self-preservation, rather than with care for their electorate, was never better illustrated than when British Prime Minister Liz Truss and her Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng were reported to have looked at stopping all cancer treatment available through Britain’s National Health Service in order to cut Government expenditure. If that is true, and it seems to be, it is despicable and grotesque; particularly when we remember that both Truss and Kwarteng would know that if they or their loved ones had cancer they would, as leaders of the Government, be entitled to, or able to buy, the best private medical treatment. Mind you, even that was perhaps not the worst I’ve ever heard. Parts of the British Medical Establishment had, prior to that, talked about cutting the amount of time and money spent on diagnosing and treating illness as a nod from the medical profession, theoretically towards helping to deal with global warming, but I believe as a part of reducing health care for Net Zero and the Great Reset.)
In the Proceedings of the Nutrition Society in 1990, Sir Richard Doll said: “There is now uniform agreement among oncologists that the incidence of cancer is determined, in large part, by factors in the environment and aspects of behaviour that are capable of modification or avoidance.”
For decades much of the international “cancer industry” has been devoted to finding magical “cures” for cancer – with little useful effect. And the greatest part of their energy has been expended on developing forms of chemotherapy – with little regard for the fact that the extent of the damage done by chemotherapy can often (indeed, usually) far exceed the value of the treatment. Chemotherapy makes huge amounts of money for the drug industry but as I will show, the evidence demonstrates that as far as many patients are concerned it probably does more harm than good.
Changing habits and customs can take decades and generations. I have absolutely no doubt that in a few decades time eating meat and drinking milk, sunbathing and the consumption of additive-rich foods will, like smoking tobacco, be regarded as bizarre and reckless practices. And routinely recommending toxic chemotherapy for patients diagnosed with cancer will be reckless bordering on criminal behaviour. Our descendants will not understand why we exposed ourselves to such unnecessary risks.
But it will take time for those changes to take place. There are laboratories to dismantle and companies to close down; butchers’ shops to shut and farmers to direct away from animal farming and towards the growing of healthy crops. With so many vested interests to oppose, all this will take a long time.
But you do not have to wait for the authorities to tell you what to eat and what to avoid eating. You do not have to wait for the food companies to start selling foods that will limit your chances of developing cancer. You don’t have to wait for the cancer industry to turn its attention away from using dangerous products or to start telling you how to reduce your cancer risk. You can take action now. This book will tell you how you can help yourself reduce your cancer risk by up to 80 per cent. Since we know what causes around 80 per cent of cancers, it is clear that we also know how to avoid 80 per cent of cancers. I realise that 80% is a long way from 100%, but it’s a lot better than 0%.
I obviously cannot and do not guarantee that you won’t get cancer if you follow the advice in this book. And I have no magic remedies to offer. In many parts of the world, it is rightly considered unprofessional and illegal to offer untested remedies for cancer.
As this book’s title suggests, I have written a long section dealing in detail with the reasons why I believe that chemotherapy is over-sold. The scientific evidence shows that the advantages of chemotherapy are often vastly outweighed by the disadvantages – disadvantages which are ignored (partly through ignorance and partly because of the power exerted by the pharmaceutical industry) by the medical profession and the media.
My own suspicion is that chemotherapy is a sophisticated and profitable fraud with cancer patients as the victims. (I would be happy to debate this statement live on any network television or radio programme but I doubt if any oncologist will dare debate with me. And I doubt if any national television or radio station would dare air the debate. Both oncologists and TV editors will reject the challenge because deep down they will worry that I’m right, and this truth is something they’d prefer to keep under wraps).
Read this book and I firmly believe that your chances of developing cancer will be significantly lower than it will be if you take no action to protect yourself. And I also believe that if you do develop cancer then the advice in this book will improve your chances of fighting your cancer and winning.
Vernon Coleman, Bilbury, Devon 2024
The above is taken from `What Doctors Won’t Tell You About Chemotherapy’ by Vernon Coleman. You can purchase a copy via the bookshop on Dr. Coleman’s website or from Amazon.
About the Author
Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc practised medicine for ten years. He has been a full-time professional author for over 30 years. He is a novelist and campaigning writer and has written many non-fiction books. He has written over 100 books which have been translated into 22 languages. On his website, HERE, there are hundreds of articles which are free to read.
There are no ads, no fees and no requests for donations on Dr. Coleman’s website or videos. He pays for everything through book sales. If you want to help finance his work, please just buy a book – there are over 100 books by Vernon Coleman in print on Amazon.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
I’m so glad Trump won the US election and that he appointed RFKennedy to sort out public health. The corrupt pharma sector is now living on borrowed time thank goodness. Good article Vernon, as always.
You’ll be extremely disappointed and soon. JFK is as much part of the club as the rest of them.
Cancer is poisoning because of the lack of proper de-poisoning. Cells are depleted of energy, there are many working ways to cure it, however the sure way not to get it is to follow our gran – or rather gran-grannies’ way what and how to eat, what and how to use (on us, cosmetics and the rest), avoid e-smog, eat real animal fat but oils, don’t eat low-fat stuff, drink real milk but pasteurised stuff, eat nose-to-tale, make your own food etc and use SALT, proper amount of salt because that’s gives the necessary energy, ions you need. The low salt was one of their biggest and harmful lies together with a low cholesterol then vegetarianism.
They didn’t use sunscreen lotions but went out to the sun, maybe wearing a hat sometimes. They didn’t use artificial fertilizers (one of the leading cause as micro nutrients are missing from the veggies because of it! was proven by a man called Beres). They didn’t use tons of cosmetics, didn’t use tons of chemicals to make everything anti-this and anti-that, they spent more time on fresh air, they didn’t carry radiating ‘smart’ phones on their bodies to directly cause tumours close to the place it was carried.
Oh, and the tap water and well water was clean enough, no added poisons like fluoride nowadays. They got only 2-3 jabs in their whole lives if at all.
Studies that link cancer to red meat consumption are flawed because they compare those that eat processed meats with vegetarian diets and don’t adjust for lifestyle differences (meat eaters are also more often smokers and drinkers), and other variables. The research is biased in favour of vegetarian diets but is then propagated as objective truth by organisations like the WHO and then quoted by the mainstream media and Dr Coleman.
Some of the additives in processed meat are known to be harmful in their own right. These chemicals, even without the red meat, could potentially make people sick.
In February 2022, the International Journal of General Medicine published a study titled “Total Meat Intake is Associated with Life Expectancy: A Cross-Sectional Data Analysis of 175 Contemporary Populations,” by Wenpeng You et al.
The researchers analysed data from 175 countries and compared newborn life expectancy with meat and carbohydrate intake, taking into account potential confounding risk factors to life expectancy—caloric intake, urbanization, obesity and education levels.
They discovered that worldwide, meat intake was associated with a longer life, and carbohydrate consumption had a weak but negative correlation with life expectancy.
We have been led to believe that the key to a long life is to minimize meat consumption and eat plenty of vegetables. Studying the diets of the people who live in so called “Blue Zone” areas of the world—those with a high percentage of centenarians, tells a different story. Meat consumption is higher in blue zone areas where people live longer.
Dr Coleman may have admirable ethical reasons for not eating meat but lets at least be honest about the science. Eating meat is not bad for your health and it does not cause cancer. If meat does cause cancer then the globalists would be encouraging us to eat more of it rather than trying to ban it altogether.
[…] https://expose-news.com/2024/11/19/cancer-chemotherapy-and-lies/ […]
I never swallowed the bit about avoiding salt, meat, animal fats and whole milk. If I don’t eat meat for a couple of days, I can feel it by being weaker and sluggish, so I get a juicy rare steak and that always fixes that problem. I have freely salted my food, drink 2 gallons of whole milk a week and fry with tallow, lard or butter. My diet also includes plenty of fresh fruit and vegs. I am 70 and my health is great and my weight is where it should be for my height. I was admonished all my life about how I ate, you would have thought I would be at the gates of death by now. I spend lots of time in the sunshine and fresh air as I am a farmer. Exactly like my forbears who lived well into their 90s in pretty good health.
The food pyramid chart that was published in the 1950’s is terrible for your health. We have been carnivores since the earliest times( at least since being ejected from Eden). My cows are strict vegetarians and they require a 4 stage stomach and a lot of chewing to process all the fiber to make it fit to be absorbed. This is what causes all the cow farts as combustion causing fiber produces gas when being broken down.
[…] The media (persuaded by the drug industry and the medical establishment which are, sadly, much the same thing) often seems to believe that chemotherapy is the only way to treat cancer. They may be rich and powerful but they’re wrong. The Guardian newspaper in the UK recently told their readers that “the damage to healthy tissues tends […]Keep reading […]
[…] By Rhoda Wilson on November 19, 2024 […]
[…] Source: https://expose-news.com/2024/11/19/cancer-chemotherapy-and-lies/ […]
[…] Fonte: https://expose-news.com/2024/11/19/cancer-chemotherapy-and-lies/ […]