|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Artificial intelligence (“AI”) is not sentient, it is simply a computer program that manipulates a collection of data. The danger is if we are tricked into believing it is all-knowing.
In a recent article, Brandon Smith argues that AI is a deliberate attempt to create an artificial god, leading to many worshipping a false idol, when it is simply part of a larger agenda to control and manipulate society.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
The current technology referred to as AI does not align with our traditional understanding of what AI is. It is not self-aware, it is not genuinely autonomous, and it has not demonstrated significant utility in practical terms. We have yet to see any major scientific discoveries made by an AI program, nor have we witnessed advancements that could positively impact the future of humanity.
Brandon Smith, founder of Alt-Market, has noticed that many proponents of AI are subtly altering their definitions of what AI is or should be. Initially, the vision was to create a new lifeform – a superintelligence or a digital god. However, it seems that these advocates are starting to abandon the criteria of self-awareness and consciousness, likely because they realise those concepts are not feasible.
AI is not truly intelligent, but rather a collection of data being manipulated by humans with questionable agendas. AI will never be alive or become a form of true consciousness.
But if this is the case, why would AI be a threat to civilisation? “It’s not so much that AI will turn on us or send out an army of robots to kill us; the real danger is that we will be tricked into believing that it really is all-knowing. If we rely on such faulty tech too much it could destroy us merely by giving us bad information and making us lazy,” Smith wrote.
Smith gives three possible consequences of AI that concern him the most; consequences which he doesn’t think most people have considered.
The AI Hive Mind
An “AI Hive Mind” is where people rely too heavily on AI for information, leading to a loss of diversity in thought and a global hive mentality.
This hive mind could be facilitated by AI-powered search engines and answer functions that provide immediate, but potentially biased or false, information, causing people to stop researching sources and alternative views.
Smith cited the mass government censorship of covid-19 information as an example of how this level of information control could become the standard, leading to a loss of critical thinking and diversity of thought.
“It would mean self destruction if we constantly agreed and never questioned our path as a species. Yet, the hive mind is exactly what Globalists are pushing us towards,” Smith wrote.
The Dead Internet Theory
The Dead Internet Theory proposes that self-generating AI bots could spread across the web, invading social media and comment sections, and injecting propaganda to create the illusion of widespread support for certain ideologies.
Smith suggested that this could lead to the burial of online discourse in AI comments, making it difficult to discern truth from disinformation and undermining the purpose of online debate.
The proliferation of AI bots could potentially destroy discourse and debate by flooding comments and social media with a single viewpoint, creating a false consensus and drowning out real debate and insights. This could lead to the loss of the global town square, where people can engage in open discussion and exchange ideas, and instead be replaced by a sea of artificial comments and white noise.
The Library Of Babel
The concept of the ‘Library of Babel’, a short story by Jorge Luis Borges, is relevant to the pursuit of artificial intelligence, as it describes an enormous library with potentially infinite rooms filled with books containing every possible combination and permutation of human language.
The story of the Library of Babel is a parable about the human desire for godhood and the hubris behind the pursuit of infinite knowledge and self-glorification, which is also applicable to the pursuit of artificial intelligence. The idea of the Library of Babel is similar to the infinite monkey theory, where a vast amount of random content is generated in the hopes of stumbling upon something meaningful or insightful.
Smith believes that the idea of the Library of Babel is one of the primary reasons for the invention of AI, as algorithms are well-suited for generating vast amounts of random content.
The pursuit of AI is driven by the desire of Globalists for godhood and the search for ultimate knowledge – a new Tower of Babel – as exemplified by the story of Kurt Godel’s attempt to create a mathematical proof to calculate the basic foundations of infinity.
However, it is possible that the secrets of the universe cannot be described in any language or mathematics that humanity possesses, and the search for ultimate knowledge may be futile. Smith suggests that the greatest knowledge humans can attain comes from the struggle of life, which AI promises to escape but cannot deliver.
Warnings
Smith warned that AI could captivate society with the promise of ultimate knowledge, leading to the abandonment of human endeavours and the pursuit of a “robotic god” that does not exist. This could result in the decline of civilisation as people become hooked on the promise of AI, giving up on self-exploration and self-improvement, and ultimately leading to their downfall.
Giving up control to AI could lead to a loss of critical thinking skills, he warned and advised that humans should always intervene and exercise oversight when using AI.
He suggested that AI could be a deliberate attempt to create an artificial god, leading to the worship of a false idol; this could be part of a larger agenda to control and manipulate society. However, AI can never give humanity a soul or self, but instead destroys both, Its sole purpose is to destroy God’s creation.
He argues that AI is a false god, or the “antichrist spirit,” that is on the march to delete or challenge humanity’s faith and delete the Holy Spirit from human consciousness. But AI is just dead software and will never be conscious, he wrote. The problem lies in humans falsely attributing godlike qualities to it, taking their eyes off the true God.
The above is a précis of the article ‘Three Horrifying Consequences of AI That You Might Not Have Thought About’ published by Alt-Market. Read the full article HERE.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
BREAKING:
AI Robot’s in Elon’s Tesla Manufacturing Plant in Texas has turned against Humans and killed 3 workers and injured 6 others before they could be shut down.
Now lets look at how this happened. It happened because some ass hole just wrote a hit piece that is pure bull shit yet 99% of you will believe it simply because you have no idea how AI truly works.
THIS DID NOT HAPPEN AND ROBOT’S CANNOT GO CRAZY ON THEIR OWN AND START KILLING PEOPLE!!!
Let me explain so that you people, afraid of your own shadow,adults with no critical thinking skills, in the simplest way I can so that maybe you can grasp it.
AI is nothing more than a computer program written by humans. Yes AI thinks and communicates through either electrical, mechanical, pressure, temperature switches etc… all designed by man. AI writes beautiful news articles and love stories etc…. programmed by man that wrote a computer program using the rules of grammar and literature that we are taught that are written in the books we learn from, that,
WAIT FOR IT
WERE WRITTEN BY MAN.
AI makes mistakes because of mistakes that the humans made making the program that TELLS THE AI WHAT, HOW, AND WHEN TO DO THINGS.
AI CANNOT BECOME SELF CONTROLLING UNLESS IT’S PROGRAMMED TO DO SO BUT STILL CANNOT THINK LIKE HUMANS BECAUSE IT’S THINKING IS LIMITED BY THE PROGRAM THAT IS IT’S BRAIN.
AI WILL NEVER START THINKING AS HUMANS DO AND TAKE OVER THE WORLD!!!
Very well said – I’ve worked in technology for 35+ years and it makes me laugh when people talk about AI this and AI that. I explain to them exactly what you have said and that AI is just using large language models/data collected regardless of its authenticity – as they always said in IT re software programmes: crap in = crap out. It’s funny when you ask large language models if they are biased i.e.
>>> are you biased
I strive to be as neutral and objective as possible, but I’m not perfect
and can make mistakes. Here are some ways in which I might be biased:
1. **Training data**: My training data is sourced from a vast amount of
text from the internet, which may contain biases and prejudices. While my developers attempt to curate the data to be representative and accurate, there’s always a risk that certain perspectives or viewpoints might be over-represented.
2. **Algorithms**: My algorithms are designed to optimize for specific
goals, such as providing helpful responses or engaging users. These goals may unintentionally introduce biases into my behavior.
3. **Lack of human judgment**: While I can process vast amounts of
information quickly, I lack the nuance and context that humans take for
granted. This means I might not always fully understand the complexities
of a situation or the nuances of language.
4. **Cultural and societal influences**: My training data is often sourced
from Western cultures and societies, which may not be representative of
all cultures or experiences.
Well said Kyle, and Raj Patel, Im sure that you remember the old description for computers : A computer is a ‘high speed idiot’
Here are my latest interpretations of the Initials AI 1, Artificial Imitation,
2, Accelerated Idiot 3, Actually Incapable (of Independant thought)
Yup. I always said it was really A.S. – Artificial Stupidity.
I’ve used AI quite a lot. It’s just a data base scraper. It can be clever in summarising long texts. That’s about it.
Gemini is supposed to be all powerful from Google. I tried it. It’s beyond pathetic. ChatGPT can actually be quite useful in digging out obscure data, but you have to ask the questions and you have to form the conclusion. I asked ChatGPT to draw me an alien on Ilkley Moor. It did a fine job EXCEPT THAT IT KEPT PUTTING A TAIL ON THE ALIEN. I told it I didn’t ask for or want a tail. I spent days explaining what a tail is and it kept saying ‘Ah I understand’. Then it would draw a new picture with a tail!
In the end I complained. The research staff apologised and said that they don’t know why it does this and thanked me.
Theres no way this database scraper is conscious. It even says so if you ask it!
https://www.radiationresearch.org/news/5g-masts-estimated-to-consume-about-as-much-power-as-73-households/
Yes, AI is not what we are told, it is not like human intelligence. But it can effectively carry out the work of groups and even entire departments of officials, much faster and more accurately than them. Is he like a human? More than a person? Are the clerks people? They are people who perform a given job mechanically, for example, collecting and processing population datasets. AI can – and will be able to do much more in the future – perform the work of entire departments of such officials, faster and more accurately. Is he like a human? Much more than a man-clerk, more than a group and department of officials.
But he is not like a human mind and will not be. And so what, fools from the comments with your enlightened “we understood the deception of the cabal – AI is a deception, it is not like a human!!”. It will collect and process your data (as programmed by the sons) like a flock of ducks, on the basis of which it will determine what you are entitled to. Is he like a human?
Fools.
And do you know what else Brandon Smith claims?
That: Donald-Warp Speed, the father of the vaccine, is a rebel against the system, against the deep state, a rod in the wheel of the NWO.
Is that right?
Did you warm up?
___
There will always be the Alt-Market of the trumptard Brandon Smith, as well as the rest of the alt-media operatives (some of them are 50, and the others are 100% AI) to cater to the naïve populations of the “opposite”.
For others (forums, for example) that disappear, there is a web archive.
(Watch the whole of 2025, see what First Things there will be, what Breakthroughs, what will be talked about most.)
“February 7, 2024
Vladimir Putin signed Executive Order On Awarding the 2023 Presidential Prize in Science and Innovation for Young Scientists.
Having considered the proposals of the Presidential Council for Science and Education, I decide:
To award the 2023 Presidential Prize in Science and Innovation for Young Scientists and the honorary title of Laureate of the Presidential Prize in Science and Innovation for Young Scientists:
Susanna Gordleeva, Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Professor of the Lobachevsky National Research University of Nizhny Novgorod, for the development of models and technologies of neuromorphic artificial intelligence based on biophysical neuron-astrocyte network models for memristive electronics;
…
S. Gordleeva’s works are devoted to the development of mathematical models of neural networks of the brain, which are applicable in the creation of new biosimilar technologies of artificial intelligence – neuromorphic systems of artificial intelligence.
S. Gordleeva obtained a number of fundamental results that reveal new principles of information processing, learning and generation of functions in brain systems based on the interaction of neurons and glial cells, as well as the causes of the development of neurodegenerative diseases in the process of aging. The identified patterns made a significant contribution to the development of the theory of neural networks and contributed to the emergence of a new scientific direction dedicated to the development of the fundamental foundations of artificial intelligence systems based on biosimilar neural networks.
Based on the developed mathematical models, applied solutions have been created in the field of neuromorphic artificial intelligence and predictive medicine to prevent the development of neurodegenerative diseases and maintain healthy longevity. The developed technologies of neuromorphic artificial intelligence are able to overcome the limitations of existing machine learning methods in terms of energy efficiency and in solving problems with time encoding of information.
The capabilities of modern microelectronics allowed S. Gordleeva to start the physical implementation of the developed neural systems in the form of hardware applications of a new generation – microelectronic neurochips that imitate various functions of the brain. Such microelectronic devices are already being tested in the country’s leading scientific organizations.
…
— In what areas can such a neural network be used?
— In fact, in any place where information processing is needed. But one of the promising tasks, perhaps, is the creation of neural implants or neural interfaces. Such systems record brain activity. Therefore, it is necessary that information processing should be carried out with the help of systems adapted to biological mechanisms.“
February 7, 2024 is one day after the interview with Tucker on February 6.
“…
“Tucker Carlson: So when does the AI empire start do you think?
Vladimir Putin: (Laughing.) You are asking increasingly more complicated questions. To answer them, you need to be an expert in big numbers, big data and AI.
Mankind is currently facing many threats. Due to genetic research, it is now possible to create a superhuman, a specialized human being – a genetically engineered athlete, scientist, military man.
There are reports that Elon Musk has already had a chip implanted in the human brain in the USA.
Tucker Carlson: What do you think of that?
Vladimir Putin: Well, I think there’s no stopping Elon Musk, he will do as he sees fit. Nevertheless, you need to find some common ground with him, search for ways to persuade him. I think he’s a smart person, I truly believe he is. So you need to reach an agreement with him because this process needs to be formalized and subjected to certain rules.
Humanity has to consider what is going to happen due to the newest developments in genetics or in AI. One can make an approximate prediction of what will happen. Once mankind felt an existential threat coming from nuclear weapons, all nuclear nations began to come to terms with one another since they realized that negligent use of nuclear weaponry could drive humanity to extinction.
It is impossible to stop research in genetics or AI today, just as it was impossible to stop the use of gunpowder back in the day. But as soon as we realize that the threat comes from unbridled and uncontrolled development of AI, or genetics, or any other fields, the time will come to reach an international agreement on how to regulate these things.”
and much more…
If AI was truly sentient and intelligent it’s proponents would be talking regularly about Artificial Ignorance, Artificial Stupidity, Artificial Hate, Artificial Greed, etc. They wouldn’t be pretending that they have achieved perfection. They never will.
[…] by Rhoda Wilson, Expose News: […]
[…] This could lead to a realisation of the Dead Internet Theory and was one of the concerns Brandon Smith raised in a recent article as one of the consequences of artificial intelligence (“AI”) that most people may not have […]
[…] Acest lucru ar putea duce la realizarea teoriei Internetului mort și a fost una dintre preocupări Brandon Smith a spus într-un articol recent ca una dintre consecințele inteligenței artificiale („AI”) pe care majoritatea oamenilor ar […]
[…] be spread online. This could lead to a realisation of the Dead Internet Theory and was a concern Brandon Smith raised in a recent article as one of the consequences of artificial intelligence (“AI”) that most people may not have […]
[…] AI won’t realise the superhuman powers Globalist controllers hoped but it still presents a danger … […]