Breaking News

From covid mass formation to Ukraine mass formation

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Please share our story!


Now that the covid narrative is collapsing, a new mass formation is emerging around the story of the war in Ukraine, Professor Mattias Desmet says.  Emotions such as fear, frustration and aggression are being redirected towards this new narrative.

In 2020, Desmet, a professor of clinical psychology, publicised his theory that, regarding the covid narrative, what was happening in society was a worldwide process of mass formation.

This new mass formation about Ukraine has the potential to be more intense and aggressive than the covid one, Prof. Desmet warns.  He believes the way of words rather than the way of war should be pursued to truly help Ukraine.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


The following is an article by Prof. Desmet describing the shift from the covid mass formation to the Ukraine war mass formation. In Europe, covid is commonly referred to as corona, an abbreviation for coronavirus.

From Corona to Ukraine – The New Mass Formation

Dear friends, followers and critics,

We are at a pivotal moment. On one hand, we are witnessing the collapse of the corona narrative; on the other, we are seeing a new mass formation arising around the story of the war in Ukraine. These two phenomena are not occurring by chance at the same time.

Table of Contents

Collapse of the Corona Narrative

What everyone who wanted to know had already long known, is now slowly seeping through to newspapers and news programmes: we can stop blaming the bats from Wuhan. The coronavirus came from a lab in Wuhan, where, indeed, they were experimenting with coronaviruses. What is now emerging in the corporate media is even worse than just the fact that the virus came from a laboratory. It is also becoming clear that (some of) those who promoted the measures always knew it came from a laboratory.

People like Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier warned from the start of the crisis that certain sequences in the virus’ DNA do not occur in nature and that the virus was a so-called “gain-of-function” creation. He was dismissed by the media and by government-paid “research journalists” and “fact-checkers” as a charlatan and conspiracy theorist.

He was simply right. It shows something of the ruthlessness with which the truth was suppressed during the crisis. Be sure to also listen to Mark Zuckerberg’s public confession with Joe Rogan. He explains there exactly why he wants to stop the fact-checking on Meta. The fact-checkers are primarily propaganda tools. They mainly serve to divert attention from the truth.

Does the origin of the virus ultimately matter? Yes, it does. It further demonstrates the dramatic failure of the entire technocratic and rationalistic approach to life and living together. Not only did the technological remedy for the disease fail (for example, the mRNA vaccines did not stop the spread of the virus), but this approach now also turns out to be responsible for the disease itself (i.e., it produced the virus).

Now that we agree the virus came from the Wuhan laboratory, the next question arises: what did virologist Anthony Fauci have to do with that lab? For those who want to know a bit more, click on THIS link to a document from the US Congress. Or read the last two books of that damned new health minister in the USA, the anti-vaxxer and conspiracy theorist Kennedy. Perhaps his mouth, like that of Professor Montagnier, generally speaks the truth on this matter as well?

And the media may slowly warm up to answering the following questions.

First question: What about the mortality rate of that gain-of-function virus? Why did the world go along for so long with mortality statistics that even the authors of them had stated in a hearing for “The House of Commons” in 2020 were much too high?

Second question: Did the vaccines stop the spread of the virus? The assumption that this was the case led to the group of people who refused the vaccine being treated as second-class citizens. They were banned from restaurants, theatres, aeroplanes and a few other things. They were pointed at by politicians worldwide as those who caused the pandemic. “The pandemic of the unvaccinated” – you remember that if you were part of that group.

Who still doubts that this whole dehumanising policy was anything but based on facts? The vaccine did not stop the spread of the virus. As for the question of how safe it was, we will wait a bit. We’ll be ready for that once the previous two questions are answered.

Despite the obvious failure of the corona policy, the proponents are preparing to apply the same strategy for the next virus outbreak (I wonder if it will come from a laboratory again). The WHO, for example, has already bought the corona-surveillance technology (the system with the QR codes and so on) from the EU to further develop it into a digital vaccination passport. It is to become part of a broader digital identity and a linked social-credit system and a digital currency (the so-called Central Bank Digital Coins).

To the extent that one is seduced in life by the idea of order and control, it is indeed a very attractive idea: to neatly reorganise the entire wriggling heap of society digitally and reduce the human ecological footprint by rewarding and punishing “good” and “bad” behaviour. Children have to be raised, don’t they? And aren’t we all little, irresponsible children? In a way, yes. The question is: which little child is going to raise the other little children?

Like any totalitarian system, the current technocratic system learns nothing from the disasters it causes. It sails blindly and fanatically on the ideological wind toward the rocks of its next failure. It sacrifices the next generation of its victims in anticipation of a technological paradise that will always remain a utopia on the horizon. Totalitarian systems always live on credit. Later, when the system is running perfectly, they will compensate for the disasters they are currently causing. And that’s why they will continue to cause disasters for the time being.

Why is the Corona Crisis Collapsing?

I could go into many other aspects of the corona crisis, but I will leave it here for now. I prefer to ask myself the question: why is the corona story collapsing now? Perhaps because insight progresses slowly and we are only now beginning to see what happened during those strange years?

I don’t think so. The appearance of the truth in the corporate media has little or nothing to do with the progress of insight. Even a small child could see from the beginning that the story was falling apart in every direction. There were, therefore, other reasons for being blind to it than the insight not being far enough advanced.

The corona story is collapsing now because all the emotions that had found refuge in it – fear, frustration, aggression, the drive toward self-destruction of the completely isolated person – have slowly found a new refuge: the story of the war in Ukraine and the prospect of a new world war.

All the fear, frustration, and aggression that had been linked to the coronavirus and “the anti-vaxxers” are now linked to a new object: “Putin” and “the Russians.” The great vital forces – the true Masters of man – have found a new story to take refuge in. The corona house remains abandoned, shrinking like a house left behind by its inhabitants, to the point that even a small push from a small mind is enough to make it collapse. If the current series of crises teaches us anything about humanity, it is this: man is not primarily a rational being; he is a being governed by vital and metaphysical forces to which his reason is radically subordinated.

The new mass formation has the potential to be more intense and aggressive than the previous one. The reason, I have explained many times: the previous mass formation only increased loneliness and the fear and aggression linked to it. Mass formations seem to take away loneliness. Hence the bewildering enthusiasm we witnessed in, for example, videos of dancing nurses and doctors.

That enthusiasm is based on an illusion. In reality, the mass only makes loneliness and all the dark feelings attached to it greater. In the mass, solidarity and connection with fellow human beings are strictly forbidden. The only solidarity allowed is solidarity with the collective. And to that, every form of solidarity and connection with another person is radically subordinated. The dramatic endpoint of this is the mother who reports her child to the state and proudly receives a medal on the scaffold for her unwavering loyalty to the collective.

War in Ukraine

In Europe, the call for war is growing louder. Now that the great monster Trump no longer wants to protect Europe, the urgent need arises to mobilise a proper army and weapon system, it is said. President Ursula von der Leyen goes so far as to say that she wants to use the savings of the population – a sloppy 800 billion – to make the war industry run at full speed.

Let me be clear: I have no need to tell a pro-Putin story. My opinion is neither pro nor con. My opinion is that the way of words, rather than the way of war, should be pursued. It is certainly not a matter of convincing you not to help Ukraine; it is a matter of thinking together with you about how we can truly help Ukraine. And that will not be by plunging the world into a third world war.

That Putin is no saint, no one needs to convince me of that. I have written a long article on Russia under Putin. Putin rose from street boy to director of the FSB, the successor of the infamous Soviet KGB. Anyone who has any knowledge of the workings and nature of that secret service knows that its director will not exactly be a sentimental soft-boiled egg.

Putin keeps a great power afloat. And he does that like leaders of great powers do. For example, the Moscow regime uses false flag operations in which hundreds of its own citizens die to create support for war in breakaway republics like Chechnya, and it eliminates journalists who speak uncomfortable truths.

That being said, the way the war story is now portrayed in the media bears the same absurd characteristics as the corona story did at the time. Russia is, in some respects, an expansionist nation. But its expansionism is small beer compared to that of NATO and the USA. Here is my modest opinion: Russia knows that in the great expansionist struggle it might lose and if it comes to war, it is largely because it feels that it has a knife to its throat.

In this article from ten years ago – written in tempore non suspecto – you can read that the geopolitical manoeuvres of NATO in the Black Sea region would inevitably lead to war with Russia. Those manoeuvres were merely the point of the spear directed at Russia in a much larger expansionist USA project. Since WWII, the USA has, by most estimates, built between 700 and 800 military bases abroad.

To those who are so convinced that Russia is the only aggressor in the Ukraine story: try looking through the eyes of the Kremlin. How would Europe or America feel if, under the cover of many beautiful stories about “democracy,” Russia marched toward Brussels or Washington with hundreds of military bases? Or also, look at the history of the regime change operations of the USA since WWII. Anyone who takes the trouble to learn about recent history will see how South America, the Middle East and Eastern Europe were gradually politically and militarily subjected by the USA and/or NATO.

I have previously written an article on the historical context of the war in Ukraine. I will not go into it in detail here. You can find the article via THIS link. In short: it is not true that Putin’s invasion of Ukraine was “unprovoked.” Since the American-initiated regime change of 2014 in Maidan Square, there have been roughly three reasons that drove Russia to start the war.

First, the Russians had humanitarian reasons. After 2014, the Kiev regime oppressed the ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine (especially the Donbas region). This was not exactly done gently. Kiev even used cluster bombs in densely populated neighbourhoods, which led to hundreds of thousands of refugees seeking safety in Russia.

I don’t know if Putin invaded Ukraine out of humanitarian concern. It is quite possible that he didn’t want to let his authority as a leader be undermined by allowing the regime in Kiev to commit atrocities against Russian-speaking Ukrainians. But this is enough to make clear that we cannot simply speak in black-and-white terms about “the bad Russians” and “the good Ukrainians.” That much I know.

Second, there were economic reasons. Since 2014, Ukraine’s vast natural resource reserves (especially minerals) were at risk of falling into American hands. The pro-American regimes that came to power in Ukraine after 2014 lifted the law that stated that foreigners could only buy up to two hectares of land in Ukraine. In no time, American companies like Cargill, Monsanto and Du Pont bought up a third of Ukrainian land, and investment giants like Blackrock signed contracts for the supply of weapons for the war (which they knew was inevitable) and for the reconstruction of the country after that war. Or how one can make a lot of money in a short time by throwing all ethical considerations overboard.

Additionally, there are important strategic reasons involved in Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Think mainly of the importance of ensuring access to the Black Sea region for Russia. If Russia does not have access to the Black Sea, it will cease to exist as a great power in the near future. NATO knows this well because they are using the militarisation of Eastern Europe and the Black Sea region to apply the strategy Lord Palmerston used in the 19th century, which led to the first Crimean War. This strategy was revived at the end of the 20th century by Brzezinski in his book ‘The Grand Chessboard’. It is well-known that the so-called neocons, who in many ways pull the strings in the USA and NATO, adopted Brzezinski’s strategy as their own.

I believe that any sober analysis of the situation will conclude that Putin and Russia had a choice: either they invaded Ukraine or it was over for Russia as a great power. Moreover, Putin already made it clear at the 2008 NATO summit in Bucharest that Ukraine was the red line: if NATO made moves to annexe Ukraine after the rest of Eastern Europe, war was the only outcome. He probably didn’t need to explain it to them, they knew it better than him. Any analysis of the historical data shows that the European and American leaders at that time realised that their manoeuvres in Ukraine were almost inevitably heading toward a third world war.

So, we are witnessing a struggle between great powers. One is more expansionist than the other, one is more successful in the dirty military game than the other. Like all great powers, they feel threatened in their dominance. Great powers are subject to the law of the Ego: the more power one has, the more fearful and aggressive one becomes. Like all great powers, they use all the harmful strategic and military techniques of our rationalist time. Both thrive on propaganda, including false flag operations where, if necessary, their own citizens are sacrificed to influence public opinion. And both do not shy away from political persecution and murder.

The population should not so much choose between one of these two great powers; they must make it clear that a large-scale military and nuclear conflict is not an option, and that at least the way of words must be fully explored first. Putin is a human being, the Russians are human beings. And a human being wants to be heard. There are enough reasons to listen carefully to what the Russians have to say.

I do not want to say with this article that Ukraine should be left to its fate. Certainly not. What I do want to say is that the lead-up to a conflict and the intentions behind it must be assessed and portrayed as accurately as possible. And that we should certainly be cautious about fuelling a war that, with diplomacy and a little bit of introspection, might be stopped. That is the only way we can truly offer the suffering men, women and children of Ukraine the prospect of ending this senseless violence.

It is an illusion to think that a looming nuclear inferno, which threatens to wipe out all life on this planet, will wake the masses up from their mass formation. The mass is an organism that thrives on death drive. Its ultimate goal is self-destruction. The person who slides into mass formation has already chosen death; the death of all others and their own death.

The only thing that can stop this tendency is the courage to speak the truth by those who feel that something is wrong with the war story. A mass formation always develops under a growing veil of illusion, a one-sided and misleading danger that attributes all the misfortune in the world to one object. It is that illusion that must be broken with words, words that are spoken from the realisation of the limitation of all knowledge, from the realisation that the truth cannot and should not be fully said, from the realisation that the one who thinks and is different is ultimately also a human being, from the realisation that the Other is only our enemy in illusion.

Mattias

About the Author

Mattias Desmet is recognised as the world’s leading expert on the theory of mass formation as it applies to the covid-19 pandemic. He is a professor of clinical psychology in the Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences at Ghent University, Belgium, and a practising psychoanalytic psychotherapist. He is well-known in academic circles for his research on fraud within academia.

He is the author of over one hundred peer-reviewed academic papers and is the author of the books ‘The Psychology of Totalitarianism’, ‘The Pursuit of Objectivity in Psychology’ and ‘Lacan’s Logic of Subjectivity: A Walk on the Graph of Desire’.

He publishes articles on a Substack page which you can subscribe to and follow HERE.

Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.

The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.

Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.

Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Please share our story!
author avatar
Rhoda Wilson
While previously it was a hobby culminating in writing articles for Wikipedia (until things made a drastic and undeniable turn in 2020) and a few books for private consumption, since March 2020 I have become a full-time researcher and writer in reaction to the global takeover that came into full view with the introduction of covid-19. For most of my life, I have tried to raise awareness that a small group of people planned to take over the world for their own benefit. There was no way I was going to sit back quietly and simply let them do it once they made their final move.

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
26 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Graham Green
Graham Green
5 months ago

‘The Coalition Of Great Deceivers’ – Starmer, Macron, Carney, N.A.T.O, E.U, W.E.F, W.H.O, U.N….

These are some of the ambitious yet truly retarded psychopaths who want to rule humanity, to dominate our world. They are dangerous, unhinged narcissists, who have created fear in you.

Fear is like rust, it destroys all intelligence.

If you want to destroy somebody’s intelligence, the first necessary thing is to create fear, create hell, create division, distrust, conflict, agony.

They created endless unnecessary wars, manufactured climate alarm-ism, fake pandemics with forced lethal solutions.

They have all failed.

The politicians and priests have been promising false hope to humanity for thousands of years, yet all their promises have proved false.

Humanity has remained poor, sick, starving, enslaved to so many things, ideologically imprisoned, financially chained.

They have driven humanity almost to madness.

The society has done something wrong with you, for certain reasons.

It wants you to be slaves, it wants you to be always afraid, it wants you to be always greedy, it wants you to be always ambitious, it wants you to be always competitive.

It wants you to be unloving, it wants you to be full of anger, violence and hatred, it wants you to remain weak, imitative, carbon copies forever seeking authoritative blind leaders.

That’s why your intelligence has been destroyed.

Meditation is needed to undo what the society has done.

Meditation is negative, it simply negates the damage, it destroys the illness, and once the illness has gone, your well-being asserts itself of its own accord.

Meditation is nothing but the undoing of that damage.

Meditation will not be needed at all if man is left alone.

If the priest and the politician do not interfere with man’s intelligence, there will be no need for any meditation.

Meditation is medicinal.

And it is not accidental that the words ‘medicine’ and ‘meditation’ come from the same root.

It is medicinal.

Intelligence is intrinsic to life.

Intelligence is a natural quality of life.

Intelligence is not an achievement, you are born intelligent.

In fact, what religions mean by God is only this, that the universe is intelligent, it is life itself.

Life is intelligence that is hidden everywhere.  

And if you have eyes to see, you can see it everywhere.

Intelligence comes from seeing not thinking!

Intelligence is naturally rebellious.

Intelligence cannot be forced into any servitude.

Intelligence is very assertive, individual.

Intelligence cannot be converted into a mechanical imitation.

People have been converted to unconscious carbon copies, their originality has been destroyed, otherwise all the nonsense that has existed on the earth would be impossible.

N.A.T.O., you seek an absolutely fraudulent security for tomorrow, which cannot be guaranteed, it is not in the nature of life.

An intelligent person knows that it is not in the nature of life, the future remains open.

To ask for security for tomorrow means to remain in constant fear.

It is not possible, so fear cannot be destroyed.

Fear will be there, you will be trembling; and meanwhile the present moment is being missed.

With the desire of security in the future you are destroying the present, which is the only life available.

The Russians are not your problem… you are.

Before you destroy humanity….

Wake up!

Garth
Garth
5 months ago

The shocking truth of that plan to use the savings of German citizens to pay for the war. Will it come to the UK?

“EU to Use 10 Trillion Euros of Citizens’ Savings for Its Militarization Plans”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1AtM53falg

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

They are going to take people’s savings. You will own nothing and be happy.

jsinton
jsinton
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

They promise to pay it back one day.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  jsinton
5 months ago

I’m sure you are being sarcastic jsinton, Cameron promised to put an end to the care home fees scandal. It never happened and didn’t Starmer promise lots of things to get elected? I think to not raise NI was one. I’m sure German politicians are the same.

As for promises about money, our banknotes still say, “I promise to pay the bearer on demand the sum of” whatever the value of the note is, but try getting that promise fulfilled. That promise was broken many years ago.

You could go into a bank and put down a ten pound note and get ten sovereigns. Today you need to pay over GBP 5,500 to get ten sovereigns. So our rulers have devalued the pound to less than a 550th of it’s value and that is what the Germans will do – pay it back in devalued currency, think Weimar.

By the way, about “I promise to pay the bearer on demand the sum of”. It is printed in tiny lettering so that people don’t notice it because our rulers don’t want people to be reminded of the broken promise.

jsinton
jsinton
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

Yes, I was making a black humor joke. I am sorry that I have the luxury of living in Florida and not having been oppressed of late and makes me insensitive to your plight.. I am sure you guys are not happy over there. I worry a lot about Europe and Britain. You are our cousins in mind, body, and spirit.

There is already too much blood on my hands which does not wash off. The satanic globalists would NEVER get my money for WW III. That would be a direct sin against God for me. I’d burn it in the back yard first, cook hot dogs.

Oh, and they’ll never pay back all the money they take from the little people, even if they win. Look how long they were paying Lend Lease.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  jsinton
5 months ago

Thanks jsinton

Garth
Garth
Reply to  jsinton
5 months ago

“WAR FUND: EU Seeks 10 Trillion Euros in ‘Citizens’ Savings’ to Fund the War Machine”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIGw8bgpB54

P T
P T
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

Watch out for your pension savings.

Lee Li
Lee Li
5 months ago

The guy is/was an actor.

Garth
Garth
5 months ago

Starmer will find the money for war. The 2 billion pound black hole will be forgotten. Was there really a black hole?

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

Starmer plots with the EU leaders to cause WW3. Lena Petrova says that in Ukraine, “The show must go on” and that it isn’t their sons and daughters who are dying.

“WW3: Fight “Till the Last Ukrainian” & UK Boots on the Ground Plan Confirmed at Ukraine Summit”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGwjywi3OO4

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

“The 2 billion pound black hole” – my mistake – “The 22 billion pound black hole”.

trackback
5 months ago

[…] Collapse of the Corona Narrative […]

Garth
Garth
5 months ago

“WW3: The EU Shifts to “Warfare” State, Will Cut Social Spending to Re-Arm for War” – 12 days ago.

At 5 minutes, Lena Petrova tells of how what they are saying is “You don’t have a choice”, then she shows a Financial Times article that says “Chronic discomfort isn’t enough. An element of real fear has to come in”.

They want you to live in fear so that you accept the plans they have.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lgzy7wJo-eY

jsinton
jsinton
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

They are all out of their minds. They have no business making war decisions over people by whom they are not elected.

Eduardo Guzmán
Eduardo Guzmán
5 months ago

What about considering, in your approach to the systems war, that the rotten money system dominates in the Western camp but not wholly in Russia (where the Central Bank is controlled by Western banker’s, and that is precisely Russia’s weakness) and not at all in China, which is the real enemy. We need clean money, Mr Desmet, and you will not have peace through words if words don’t touch this mother of all lies: Modern money. From a scientific standpoint you can read Richard A. Werner. Kind regards

Lisa Franklin
Lisa Franklin
5 months ago

I read Mattias Desmets book. I felt it was very accurate and a good read-helpful. Sadly, most people cannot see they are being propagandised and will deny it even though its in government documents in the public domain. Its very clear.to me that their policies are designed to divide and rule by instilling fear at every turn. As Buddha said – there are 3 things you can only hide for a short time- the sun the moon and the truth. The rats have bunkers because they’re scared of us.

Antonio
Antonio
5 months ago

Virus dal laboratorio? Si è il vaccino…….

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
5 months ago

To Israel mass formation…oops.

Donita Forrest
Donita Forrest
5 months ago

In short, it’s one Schwabian/WEF psy-op after the next, after the next, called the 2020-2030 Agenda. Only stupid sinister people are a part of it any more.

Christine.257
Christine.257
5 months ago

If the Chinese really created the Covid-19 virus, why are there only American or English names on the patents for it, when Moderna patented it, back in 2013 and why did a European Court recently say that Moderna owned the Covid-19 virus (Key Element) patents and BionTech for Pfizer had pirated them from Moderna:The Chinese made Covid-19 and released it on the World – Yes, Right – not one Chinese name on the patents for Moderna’s Covid-19 virus in 2013
Basically it is irrefutable proof that Moderna created the Covid-19 virus and here are the Patents for it: ModernaGate: Moderna wins Award for Deadly Covid Vaccine it was able to create prior to 2019 because “Murderna” is responsible for creating the Covid-19 Virus in a BioLab… #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG By The Exposé on April 30, 2023
https://christine257.substack.com/p/cctcggcgggcacgt
Moderna’s Covid-19 virus #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG may evade vaccines or the protection of natural immunity. CDC
Moderna was part of the planning and implementation of covid-19, gain-of-function experimentation, and vaccine profiteering. Here are the patents:
US9149506B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding septin-4 – 2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc.
Inventor: Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles
US9216205B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding granulysin – 2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc.
US9255129B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding SIAH E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 – 2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc.
US9301993B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding apoptosis inducing factor 1 – 2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc.
US9587003B2: Modified polynucleotides for the production of oncology-related proteins and peptides – 2016-02-04 Application filed by ModernaTx Inc.
Inventor: Stephane Bancel, Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles, Sayda M. Elbashir, Matthias John, Atanu Roy, Susan Whoriskey, Kristy M. Wood, Paul Hatala, Jason P. Schrum, Kenechi Ejebe, Jeff Lynn Ellsworth, Justin Guild
Learn more about this bombshell SARS-CoV-2 laboratory origin evidence at The Expose.
https://christine257.substack.com/p/moderna-patented-a-19-nucleotide
Not a Chinese name amongst them – just American or English names – why not ask them what they did and why, make it “personal”

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
Reply to  Christine.257
5 months ago

And ex PM Sunak invested £100k in Moderna just before Covid.

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
5 months ago

Oh dear pending approval

trackback
5 months ago

[…] by Rhoda Wilson, Expose News: […]