Giving some personal examples, Dr. Vernon Coleman describes how banks are moving towards removing cash from the financial system.
We are told it is for our benefit – but this is a lie, he says. “They want to get rid of cash for their benefit and not for our benefit. Removing cash will empower the conspirators and remove, forever, the last vestiges of our independence.”
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
I’ve been warning about the end of cash for at least three decades, and the conspiratorial authorities have been pushing hard for the introduction of digital currencies since the days before laptops and smartphones.
Today, the bankers (aided and abetted by politicians) are closing banks as fast as they can (arguing falsely that everyone wants to bank online), and they’re making it difficult to take cash out of your bank. Automated teller machines (“ATMs”) are rapidly disappearing, and if you try to take cash out of your account over the counter, you could well end up being interrogated like a criminal.
Once the digital currencies become the only way to earn, save or spend, we will all be slaves. The central banks will be able to control our money. They already plan to limit each person to between £10,000 and £20,000. Anything more than that will simply disappear. Negative interest rates will discourage savings. Money will have a limited shelf life – just as money in mobile phones can disappear after a few months. And the bankers will decide how you can spend your money.
It is worth pointing out, by the way, that the central banks have mostly become “independent.” When this happened in the UK in 1997, the Labour Government misled the country, saying that it was giving the Bank of England its independence and granting it operational independence over monetary policy so that it could be free of government influence. In fact, this was rather disingenuous since all central banks were modified to suit the requirements of the financial elites – who prefer to deal with independent banks. In the European Union, it was the Maastricht Treaty which gave independence to the central banks. The European Central Bank, in the EU, is controlled by Deutsche Bank (which was for a long time controlled by Abs, a former Nazi) and other German and European banks. The EU and its Parliament have no control over the bank or its policy. Monetary policy all around the world is controlled by the world’s leading financial institutions. Governments, remember, have no control.
Everyone, it seems, wants to get rid of cash.
First, companies which accept payment by card have to pay commission to the credit card companies. The commission can sometimes be very high with 5% and 7% commission rates not at all uncommon.
Second, clearing banks don’t like cash because handling it is time consuming and, therefore, expensive. Moving money around simply by pressing numbers on a keyboard is much quicker and cheaper (though, curiously, the length of time required to move money from one account to another seems to have lengthened since such methods became available).
Third, governments and government agencies love to see citizens forced to rely on digital money because it is much easier to keep control of what everyone is earning and spending when all money goes through computers. So, for example, in the UK the tax office (HMRC) easily obtained details of what taxi drivers are doing by looking at the records from companies such as Uber. When drivers apply to renew their licences, HMRC sends out threatening letters suggesting that they may have made an under-declaration or no declaration at all.
And, of course, there are all those people who think that using plastic to pay for everything is clever and modern. They don’t realise that plastic cards and chips under their skin are enslaving them and removing the last vestiges of freedom.
Any business which relies on a financial trail (e.g. one that uses an e-commerce site) can now be easily monitored by all government departments. And, of course, it is much easier for banks or the Government to cut off a person’s access to their own money if everything is done digitally. And when all money is digital, banks and other financial institutions will be able to charge what they like. Tax authorities will take what they like from your account.
In the new world of digital money, anyone who shares what is labelled “hate speech” or “misinformation” will be banned from having an account. (It is, of course, already happening.) All those old tweets, and the time you gave a “thumbs down” to the World Economic Forum (“WEF”), will be marked against you.
Remember how American citizens who gave money to the Canadian Truckers had their bank accounts frozen? If you’ve ever criticised your government, then they will make you pay heavily for your impertinence.
Those people who have already lost their PayPal accounts will probably never be allowed to have digital accounts. And without digital accounts, they will starve.
It’s already becoming nigh on impossible to buy petrol without a credit card. And the number of car parks where cash is still accepted is shrinking fast.
Banks throughout the world are preparing to close down all free thinkers. If you think I’m exaggerating, just check out what has already happened.
It has been made clear (by the Bank of England and other clearing banks) that when cash has been replaced with digital currencies, the banks will control how people spend their money. It will be possible to make broad judgements (for example, no one will be able to buy alcohol) and specific ones (patients with early heart trouble will not be allowed to buy certain foods). It will also be possible for governments, banks and companies to monitor spending habits. So, if there is a shortage of eggs, for example, the authorities will be able to make sure that no one buys more eggs than they are allowed.
Removing cash from society will make life incredibly difficult (for which read “impossible”) for those who are not computer literate, for beggars and for charities who rely on cash. The quality of our lives will be massively diminished by the disappearance of cash. And, of course, getting rid of cash can be used to track where we go and what we do.
Many local councils are now forcing motorists to use an App available only on a smartphone to pay for parking, and in those places, it is impossible to pay for a parking place with cash. The information which motorists are forced to give can be used in many ways (and will be sold to a variety of purchasers so, for example, thieves will know when householders are away from their homes). Forcing motorists to use a smartphone in order to park a vehicle is clearly discriminatory (since it means that those without a smartphone cannot park) and almost certainly illegal.
And, of course, people tend to overspend when they use credit or debit cards for everything they buy. Using cash helps keep people out of debt.
It’s vital to remember that they want to get rid of cash for their benefit and not for our benefit. Removing cash will empower the conspirators and remove, forever, the last vestiges of our independence.
We really are close to the end as far as cash is concerned. According to data provider Merchant Machine, cash is now used in only 1% of payments in the most digitalised economies in the world, including Sweden, Denmark, Singapore and the UK. Every time anyone uses a credit or debit card, or flashes a contactless payment card for a small purchase, they are taking us closer to a digital society and digital enslavement.
The end of cash is now just months away.
And when cash disappears, it will take with it the last vestige of our freedom.
The restrictions on what we can and cannot do with our own money get longer by the day. For example, states within the EU will have to collect information on the ownership of luxury goods such as aeroplanes, boats and cars, and each member state will have to establish a “financial intelligence unit.” Rules in England now make it extraordinarily difficult for citizens to access their own money or even to move it from one account to another.
I recently tried to take some of my money out of my account and was shut in a room and interrogated like a criminal before eventually, and rather begrudgingly, being given an envelope containing the cash I’d asked for.
Even moving from one account to another has become fiendishly bewildering and time-consuming.
I was standing in a bank the other day, trying to move money from one account to another. I was moving my money from one of my own accounts to another of my own accounts. I don’t know if you’ve tried doing this recently but it gets harder by the week. You need to produce a driving licence or a passport, of course. (Heaven help you if you don’t have one or the other, or preferably both.) And you need your bank card. And, depending upon the mental state of the cashier, you may need a utility bill, a tax form and a council tax demand. You may soon need a note from your mother.
And, of course, they now have a veritable litany of questions to fire at you. “Has anyone asked you to make this transaction?” “Are you under pressure to do this?” And so on and so on. They pretend the questions are to protect us, but only the naïve and dim-witted believe that. These stupid questions are devised by very wicked people to delay the whole procedure and to force us all to bank online.
One of the daftest questions is this one: “Is anyone waiting outside for you?”
Standing next to me, at the neighbouring window, stood a little old lady – well, in her nineties. She, too, was trying to move money from one account to another so that she could pay a bill.
“Is anyone waiting outside for you?” asked the bank clerk.
“Oh yes,” said the little old lady naively. “My friend brought me.”
The clerk looked as pleased as if she’d won the lottery. “Oh, well, I can’t help you then,” she said with a big smile and a sense of satisfaction you could have bottled.
The little old lady didn’t understand. “But my neighbour had to bring me,” she explained. “I’m 93. I had to give up my driving licence.”
The poor woman didn’t understand that logic and honesty are no longer relevant.
“But your neighbour might have put you under pressure to make this transaction,” said the clerk, brim full of sanctimonious, self-righteous, box-ticking obedience.
“My neighbour?” said the old lady. “Why would she do anything nasty to me? I’ve known her for nearly 50 years.” She looked around, bewildered. “I’ve been banking here for years. Doesn’t anyone recognise me?”
“That doesn’t matter,” said the clerk, her joy now slightly diluted by exasperation. “I can’t help you if you have someone waiting for you. Those are the rules.” And then she added the killer. “It’s for your protection.”
And so the old lady, puzzled and confused, tottered out of the bank and back to her neighbour’s car.
I swear that happened. And I’m not surprised.
(The banks make a great fuss about our responsibilities and their lack of them. But did you know that Barclays Bank has just been fined $361 million by the US Securities and Exchange Commission? And do you know why? Well, they “accidentally” sold $17.7 billion worth of structured financial products for which they did not have authorisation. The total effect on shareholders (including many pensioners), as a result of this $17.7 billion “accident,” was to help push down net income by 19%. The little old lady’s one mistake was that she didn’t tell the clerk to move $17.7 billion that she didn’t have from one account to another. They’d have done that with a smile and probably given her a free pen and a cup of coffee, too. )
Morons (of whom there are many these days) claim, as they have been told, that the inquisition is for our benefit. That’s yet another lie. The banks want to force us online. And, as a side effect, they want to absolve themselves from blame when they screw up (which they do on a regular basis). If you want evidence that the banks have been politicised, just look at the way that people who dare to stand up and question the system lose their bank accounts. In Canada, citizens who stood up in defence of truckers protesting about vaccine mandates lost their bank accounts. And the same thing is happening with frightening regularity everywhere else. In England, the boss of an independent platform carrying free speech videos lost his bank account and found that no other bank would accept him as a customer. No one could tell him what his crime was. Nigel Farage, the well-known politician, was suddenly told that a bank he had been with for 40 years was going to close his accounts – both business and personal. A man who asked why his local building society was festooned with flags celebrating homosexuality found the cost of free speech when the building society responded to his query by closing his account.
Bank staff seem to have been indoctrinated by the same people who indoctrinated NHS staff, train drivers, civil servants, teachers, council employees and just about everyone else in this increasingly miserable and oppressive world of ours.
(Teachers call what they do “brainwashing in a good cause.” But can brainwashing ever be defended? If the evidence for their claims were solid and honest, they would not need to make stuff up or attempt to brainwash their students. For decades now, school teachers have been indoctrinating rather than teaching their pupils, promoting the myth of climate change, changing history to meet woke demands and altering the balance of history to suit their propaganda. And refusing to allow pupils to question or debate the official version of history.)
Taking cash out of your own account has become an exercise in patience and determination.
I recently went into a branch of my bank wanting to take out some money – a little more than the machine would allow me to withdraw. I had bills to pay and I wanted to buy some presents.
“Are you going to take this money home and keep it there?” asked the clerk.
I thought this was an incredibly stupid question. The woman was a stranger, and she had my address on a screen in front of her. She wanted to know if I was going to take money home and keep it there to be stolen. What an idiot. So, I was a little cautious. As any sensible person would, I said “No.”
“So, why do you want this money?” asked the impertinent bank clerk.
“To buy sweets,” I replied. It has been my standard reply to this question for years.
Bang. I could tell from her eyes that the metaphorical shutters had come down.
You can’t make light-hearted comments any more.
The clerk looked at her screen as if it were telling her something.
“Your request has been blocked,” said the clerk.
In full sight of other customers, I was ushered into a room and the door was closed.
And I was interrogated. I felt like a criminal. Most people would, I think, have found it a humiliating and embarrassing encounter.
Phone calls were made. I was instructed to answer questions put to me on the telephone. (I couldn’t understand the questioner’s accent and so I needed a translator.) To check my identity, I was asked for my date of birth (a piece of information that is about as secret as Prince Harry’s level of affection for his brother).
And eventually, after what seemed like several hours of interrogation, I was, with ill grace and no apology, given the amount of money I had requested.
It wasn’t a loan I was asking for. It was my money.
It is, of course, all part of the scheme to force us to bank online – ready for the digital currency they have ready for us.
Your bank hates you. They want to turn you into nothing more than numbers on a computer.
When cash disappears, you will become a slave of the system. You will have no freedom and no independence. The authorities will be able to turn off your access to your own money. You will own nothing and you will not be happy. You’ve been warned.
Note: The above is taken from `Their Terrifying Plan’ by Vernon Coleman. For details of the book, please CLICK HERE.
About the Author
Vernon Coleman, MB ChB DSc, practised medicine for ten years. He has been a full-time professional author for over 30 years. He is a novelist and campaigning writer and has written many non-fiction books. He has written over 100 books which have been translated into 22 languages. On his website, HERE, there are hundreds of articles which are free to read. Since mid-December 2024, Dr. Coleman has also been publishing articles on Substack; you can subscribe to and follow him on Substack HERE.
There are no ads, no fees and no requests for donations on Dr. Coleman’s website or videos. He pays for everything through book sales. If you would like to help finance his work, please consider purchasing a book – there are over 100 books by Vernon Coleman available in print on Amazon.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, UK News
I agree with a lot of this but not all of it. eg. I don’t agree with the 1% cash transactions. It is well known that use of cash is on the rise once again and I have seen it for myself over the last couple of years. Whereas once I would be the only one at the ATM, now it is lovely to see constant queues of people. People are pushing back. I also don’t buy food in supermarkets anymore (you never know what it’s pumped full of).
I buy all my food from Farmers’ Markets and small independents and pay cash. Yes, it is (slightly) more expensive but I prioritise decent food over smoking or drinking etc. People need to make their own financial judgments. No barriers stopping you from leaving with the goods you have purchased before having your receipt scanned like you were a criminal, and no cameras scanning your retinas. I certainly never use self-serve machines in any physical shops and businesses and leave goods on the counter if they don’t accept cash.
For petrol, I am lucky enough to have a (sadly rare, I realise) tiny independent petrol station just up the road from me. Two pumps, no self service allowed and I pay with cash and have a lovely chat. I have been buying my petrol and diesel (when I had a diesel car) from this gentleman for 30 years. I actually cannot bring myself to pay for fuel in a supermarket now where you get shouted at through some tannoy.
I try to pay most bills in cash at one of the few Post Offices that are left. Council Tax, telephone bills etc are all paid over the counter using cash.
If a business refuses cash, I refuse to patronise them. The people who blindly follow all this online “convenience” are the very same people who are crying and shouting when the systems go down (as they frequently do) and therefore cannot buy their shopping or whatever else they want to do and yet many still can’t see the end game.
We need to keep pushing back, but it does concern me that maybe we are too late. But I only use my mobile for calls, texts (isn’t that what they are actually for?), taking photos and a morning alarm. I don’t do online banking and (at the moment at least) it is not illegal not to own a not-so-smart phone. Half the time I don’t even have it with me, and so far as I know, it is not illegal (yet) NOT to have one. Unlike so many others, I don’t live my entire life as a slave to my mobile phone. It’s like a comfort blanket for so many people and they seem to have completely lost the ability for cognitive thinking.
Apologies for such a long comment, but all this really makes me mad. People need to wake up and see what’s going on – not just with regard to cash, but everything else too. You would think that in the 21st Century, people would be better educated but we appear to be regressing back to Medieval Times when the Church ruled. Now the WEF & WHO think they can take its place. Well, they can Foxtrot Oscar.
“RESIST! DEFY! DO NOT COMPLY!” (Piers Corbyn)
Hello Cheryl Rowlands,
Thank you very much for taking the time to express your pertinent views on such an important topic: The authoritarian push toward the final destruction of human freedom, through the establishment of suffocating cashless societies and installation of asphyxiating Fascist totalitarian digital dictatorship slavery for the masses.
With human freedom now undoubtedly at stake, now is the precise time for people across the world to powerfully resist, starting with total rejection of any form of digital IDs. Future generations are depending on this generation’s successful resistance – and defeating/stopping the criminally-planned global dystopian manifestation of a technocracy-transhumanist literal Hell on Earth.
I have followed Dr. Vernon Coleman for a number of years . He is brilliant, honest, thought provoking and wish I had him as my physician ( I have a very good doctor ) even though he has had his medical accomplishments stripped from him by the numbnuts at Britain’s ” health elitists” , who couldn’t organize a 2 car parade. They are all bought and paid for by government stoogies who are ” just following orders” where have we heard that before Hhhmmm Nuremberg rings a bell .
When electronic payment systems crash, as often do, payer and payee are stymied if no cash. Paying with cash instantly reliably pays payee. Cannot pay with phone or card, only transfer money between accounts by (using) phone or card.
More in UK pay with cash so more cash circulating; less easy to eliminate. No ‘smart-phone’, no money to town-centre or car-parks.
When I needed some money from my savings account, staff wanted ID as well as passbook e.g. driving licence, but refused to accept mine because not digital. So I closed my account, which enabled me to get every penny of mine from them.
I was interrogated at my bank because I wanted to withdraw £750 in cash. I had just perchased a little pedigree dog and the breeder, who had been scammed through internet banking (someone had bought a dog from her and the digital payment had never materialised); asked if I would consider making the payment in cash. I had no problem with this as I knew my bank account would adequately cover the bill.
When I requested the withdrawal at the bank I found myself being bombarded with ridiculous questions. What was the money for? Was it a genuine breeder? Had I inspected both the stud and bitch before agreeing the transaction? Were the breeders noteworthy? Why had I been requested to pay in cash and not through a bank transfer etc..? Quite a queue built up behind me and I felt myself becoming more and more annoyed at the situation. So much so that finally I proclaimed in a loud voice ‘It is my money and my business and I demand you stop this nonsense and kindly complete the transaction?’
Her reaction?..We have to ask these questions for your own protection…
Such brainwashed ‘assistants’ must think we’re all stupid and unable to conduct our own business affairs.