
This table shows the levels of carbon dioxide that were recorded under various different conditions during the study.
Results of a clinical trial conducted earlier this year found that wearing a face mask for just three minutes had “adverse effects” on children and could lead to breathing problems.
The research letter which is titled “Experimental Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Content in Inhaled Air With or Without Face Masks in Healthy Children” detailed the results of a randomised clinical trial which was carried out on the 9th and 10th April 2021 and included 45 children.
The study was carried out by a team of seven researchers including Harald Walach, PhD., Ronald Weikl, MD., and Juliane Prentice, BA.
The letter detailed that many governments around the world have made “nose and mouth coverings and or face masks compulsory for schoolchildren”, and that the “evidence base” for this is “weak.”
According to the letter, a large-scale survey in Germany of adverse effects of carbon dioxide inhalation for parents and children wearing face masks – using data of 25,930 – showed that 68% of the participating children had breathing problems when wearing face coverings.
As a result, the German Federal Environmental Office has stated that a level of 0.2% by volume of carbon dioxide or 2000 ppm is the limit for closed rooms – the normal content of carbon dioxide in the open is about 0.004% by volume (ie, 400 ppm) – and anything beyond this level is deemed unacceptable.
During the study, researchers measured the carbon dioxide level in inhaled air with and without two types of face coverings in a controlled and well-ventilated room, using healthy volunteer children. Researchers measured the baseline carbon dioxide levels without a face mask for three minutes, then a nine-minute measurement for each type of face mask was conducted: three minutes to measure the carbon dioxide content in joint inhaled and exhaled air, and three minutes for measuring carbon dioxide content during exhalation.
The carbon dioxide content of the ambient air was always kept under 0.1% by volume using ventilators within the room. According to the research letter, the sequence of masks was always randomised, which was “blinded and stratified by age of children.”
During the research letter, the researchers stated that the mean age of the children was 10.7 (2.6) years (range, 6-17 years) out of the 20 girls and 25 boys. The only impact on the results appeared to be the age of the children as this had a small impact on the carbon dioxide content in inhaled air, however, the use of two different types of face masks had no impact on the carbon dioxide content inhalation.
During the study, researchers measured means between 13120 (384) and 13910 (374) ppm of carbon dioxide in inhaled air under surgical and filtering facepiece 2 (FFP2) masks, which researchers stated: “is higher than what has already been deemed unacceptable by the German Federal Environmental Office by a factor of 6.”
This worryingly high value was reached after only three minutes of measurement, yet children under normal conditions in schools wear face masks for “a mean of 270 (interquartile range, 120-390) minutes.”

This figure shows a scatterplot of carbon dioxide content in inhaled air under filtering facepiece mask by age.
According to the figure pictured above, the value of the child with the lowest carbon dioxide level was three-fold greater than the limit of 0.2% by volume. Additionally, the youngest children in the study had the highest values, with one seven-year-old child’s carbon dioxide level measured at 25,000 ppm.
The researchers concluded that the complaints that the children made during the study were “consequences of elevated carbon dioxide levels in inhaled air” due to the “dead-space volume of the masks, which collects exhaled carbon dioxide quickly after a short time.” The carbon dioxide collected in the mask then mixes with the fresh air remaining under the mask and elevates the carbon dioxide content of inhaled air under the mask, which researchers noted was more pronounced in this study for younger children.
Disturbingly, the effects of carbon dioxide inhalation through face masks lead to “impairments attributable to hypercapnia.” Hypercapnia is where there is too much carbon dioxide present in the bloodstream, which can cause symptoms such as dizziness, headaches, and shortness of breath. However, severe hypercapnia can be life-threatening if not treated and can cause symptoms such as seizures, panic attacks, and loss of consciousness.
In conclusion, the researchers advised that decision-makers explored the evidence produced by studies such as this, which clearly show that children should not be forced to wear face masks.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help..
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
.
Can you please help power The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful journalism for the years to come…
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
such as Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal
are trying to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support belowV support
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?, The Expose Blog, World News
If your goal is to make as many people as sick as possible to maximize profits from the drug and medical cartels, then making kids wear masks is a good business plan.
Who even wrote this article, and based on what? A fucking piece of cloth is not deadly.
A “fucking piece of cloth” is that it?
LMAO, you have perhaps been sniffing that “cloth” yourself a bit too much to be that level of dumb?
Keep sniffing, you are almost Boris and his cousin Queenie grade stupid i.e virtually brain dead.
FRANCE 8 June 2021
“At least 60.5 million face masks rated as FFP2 and distributed to health workers should no longer be worn to protect against Covid, as inhaling their particles could be toxic for the lungs, health authority SantĂ© publique France (SPF) has said.”
The fact checkers were calling it a conspiracy throughout 2020 Amazing how many “conspiracy theories” throughout the decades have actually been proven to be true.
https://www.connexionfrance.com/French-news/Hospital-face-masks-biomass-graphene-recalled-in-France-due-to-potential-toxic-respiratory-risk
Ur right, a piece of cloth is not deadly, but since this study is based on breathing in ur own exhaled carbon dioxide which is toxic when the cloth is obstructing ur nose, the hairs in ur nose are their for a reason Lmao at u
Er, the scientists quoted my friend. You didn’t actually read the article did you? Not your job to though eh? Enjoy your day.
So keep breathing your own shit and harbour Bacterial farms in front of your face you Ignorant 🤡
its symptomatic of a psychopathology on their part to continue this entire delusional pandemic saga.They know its not true.
Don’t go pretending you care about kids. You dont care about anybody but yourself. Youre selfish and greedy, and how dare you.
[…] ByClifford James July 1, 2021 Scientific Study on Kids Finds Wearing a Face Mask for Just 3 MINUTES is Toxic […]
[…] Uit de resultaten van een klinische studie die eerder dit jaar werd uitgevoerd, blijkt dat het dragen van een gezichtsmasker gedurende slechts drie minuten “nadelige gevolgen” heeft voor kinderen en kan leiden tot ademhalingsproblemen, bericht dailyexpose.co.uk. […]
Common sense tells you that impeding the exhalation of used air ,reducing circulation and ventilation isnt going to be healthy Any knob who needed to do a taxpayer funded research study into that needs assessing in a mental health case study .
I guess the scientist ‘knobs’ were just trying to scientifically prove their point that masks are harmful – which Govt knobs and their cronies continue to promote.
[…] https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/07/01/scientific-study-on-kids-finds-wearing-a-face-mask-for-just-3-m… […]
[…] Please check this out. “Results of a clinical trial conducted earlier this year found that wearing a face mask for just three minutes had “adverse effects” on children and could lead to breathing problems.” “…a large-scale survey in Germany of adverse effects of carbon dioxide inhalation for parents and children wearing face masks – using data of 25,930 – showed that 68% of the participating children had breathing problems when wearing face coverings.” Source: Daily Expose […]
[…] are studies from Germany showing that carbon dioxide levels underneath those masks are exponentially more significant than […]
[…] are studies from Germany showing that carbon dioxide levels underneath those masks are exponentially more significant than […]
[…] are studies from Germany showing that carbon dioxide levels underneath those masks are exponentially more significant than […]
[…] evidence that shows that face coverings are neither safe nor effective. For example, results of a clinical trial that was conducted earlier this year discovered that wearing a face mask for just three minutes had “adverse effects” on children and […]
This research letter was retracted. A scientific review found poor methodology, improper use of device to measure CO2, and invalid conclusions. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2782288
[…] Scientific Study on Kids Finds Wearing a Face Mask for Just 3 Minutes is Toxic […]
They deliberately retracted this study. They are really pushing for these dangerous face diapers. This nonsense must stop and all involved with recommending face masks must be held accountable and thrown out of office.