Breaking News

Latest UKHSA Report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have negative effectiveness as low as MINUS 126% as infections in the Fully Vaccinated soar

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Please share our story!

The latest report available from the UK Health Security Agency shows that the Covid-19 vaccines are now proving to have negative effectiveness in everyone over the age of 30 in the UK as low as minus-one-hundred-and-twenty-six-percent.

Pfizer claim that there Covid-19 mRNA injection has a vaccine effectiveness of 95%. They were able to claim this because of the following –

During the ongoing clinical trial, 43,661 subjects were split evenly between the placebo and vaccine groups (about 21,830 subjects per group).

In the placebo group — the group that didn’t have the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine — 162 became infected with the coronavirus and showed symptoms.

Whilst in the vaccine group — the group that got the real vaccine — that number was only 8.

Therefore the percentage of placebo group who became infected equated to 0.74% (162 / 21830 x 100 = 0.74).

Whilst 0.04% of the vaccinate group became infected (8 / 21830 x 100 = 0.04)

In order to calculate the efficacy of their Covid-19 mRNA injection, Pfizer then performed the following calculation –

They first subtracted the percentage of infections in the vaccinated group from the percentage of infections in the placebo group.

0.74% – 0.04% = 0.7%

Then they divided that total by the percentage of infections in the placebo group, which equated to 95%.

0.7 / 0.74 = 95%.

Therefore, Pfizer were able to claim that their Covid-19 mRNA injection is 95% effective.

We don’t need to go into the fact that this calculation was extremely misleading and only measured relative effectiveness rather than absolute effectiveness. Neither do we need to go into the fact that Pfizer chose to ignore thousands of other suspected infections during the ongoing trial and not perform a PCR test to confirm the infection because it would have thrown efficacy below the required minimum of 50% to gain regulatory approval.

The reason we don’t need to go into it is because the general public are being told that the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is 95% effective due to the calculation performed above. The same calculation was also used based on individual results to claim a vaccine efficacy of around 70% for AstraZeneca, and around 98% for Moderna.

Now, thanks to a wealth of data published by the new UK Health Security Agency we are able to use the same calculation that was used to calculate 95% effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine, to calculate the real world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines.

Table 3 of the UK Health Security Agency Vaccine Surveillance report, published November 11th 2021, shows the number of recorded infections by vaccination status between week 41 and week 44 of 2021. It also shows the confirmed case rate among persons fully vaccinated, and rates among persons not vaccinated per 100,000 people.

Pfizer had an equal amount of people who had been vaccinated, and had not been vaccinated in the ongoing clinical trial in order to calculate the effectiveness of their vaccine, so in order to calculate the real-world effectiveness all we have to do is perform the same calculation using the rates per 100,000 numbers supplied by the UK Health Security Agency, which are as follows –

The effictiveness of all available vaccines combined is as low as minus-126% within the 40-49 age group, and only as high as +13% in the 18-29 age group, the only age group other than the under 18’s that the vaccines are currently showing to have a positive effectiveness.

This proves that the Covid-19 vaccines are making people more susceptible to catching Covid-19, rather than preventing cases of Covid-19 by the claimed 95%, and the fact the effectiveness of the vaccines has now surpassed the minus-100% barrier in everyone between the age of 40 and 69, suggests that it has completely decimated their immune systems, at least when it comes to infection from the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus.

By combining the numbers provided for all age groups over the age of 18, we have been able to calculate an average vaccine effectiveness of minus-69%, and we’re definitely seeing this in the number of confirmed cases by vaccination status.

Between week 41 and week 44 of 2021 there were 79,516 confirmed Covid-19 cases in the unvaccinated over 18’s, 25,554 confirmed cases in the partly vaccinated over 18’s, and a frightening 450,132 confirmed cases in the fully vaccinated over 18’s.

The new UK Health Security Agency report proves without a shadow of a doubt that the Covid-19 vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission.

Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.

The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.

Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.

Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Please share our story!
author avatar
The Exposé
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
51 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ibmekon
Ibmekon
3 years ago

Well, for me that nails the coffin lid down firm and tight.
The vaxxed have an increased chance of hospitalisation , an increased chance of a covid death.
Also, the jab may just kill them in days, or paralyze them for life.
And without any compensation their children will be left penniless orphans.
And the effect on fertility, fetal abnormalities is yet to show.
Meanwhile the drug companies pocket trillion of dollars profit.
The USA drops a bomb every 12 seconds – a continuous stream of death for profit.
Their drug companies now do the same.

Knowi
Knowi
3 years ago

Calculating the effectiveness over all age groups gives:

week41-44:
Unvaccinated all age goups per 100k: 4559.9
Vaccinated all age groups per 100k: 7694.2
(4559.9 – 7694.2) / 4559.2 =
-41%

Comparing with
week 38-41:
Unvacc. all age goups per 100k: 3586.8
Vaccinated all age groups per 100k: 5874.2
-64%

There could be several factors at play, why effectivity is not continously becoming worse.

For example, if there is a big new cohort of newly vaccinated people, the new infections among the vaxxed drop -> effectivity rises.

But the shocking fact, that the vacc. shows a negative effectivity is obvious.

The only positive fact that so far remains, is the effectivity in reducing serious illness.

But I expect, even this effect will wane over time…

Knowi
Knowi
3 years ago

There seems to be a systemic error in calculating the effectiveness rate:
by simply using the per 100.000 in the UKHS statistics:
Because the 100.000 is a measure of the whole population. It make sit possible to compare vaxxd or unvaxxd “cases”, but to calculate effectineness, it is necessary that the cases among the vaxxed and the cases among the unvaxxed are known.

Extreme example:
100% of population vaccinated.
Then only vaccinated people can show symptoms.
Unvaccinated would be 0 people.

Which would result in minus unlimited negative effeciveness.

The correct calulation needs to put the the ratio of the vaccinated population into account.

Lets take the effecteness calculation from the article:
week41-44:
Unvaccinated all age goups per 100k: 4559.9
Vaccinated all age groups per 100k: 7694.2
(4559.9 – 7694.2) / 4559.2 =
-41%

Needs to be adjusted with the ratio of vaccinated:

The Vaccine surveillance report from week 44 gives 66.4% for one shot (60.9% two shots).

IMO the most simple way is to adjust the 100k denominator by the percentage factor of vaccinated/unvacinated.

Vaxxed: multiply cases by (100% – vaxxrate%) = (100% – 66.4%) = *0.336
Unvaxxed: multiply by *0.664 (66.4%)

Effectiveness compensated for vaxxination rate:

Unvaxxed: 4559.9 cases; compensated for vaxx rate (*0.664): 3027.8
Vaxxed: 7694.2 cases; compensated for vaxx rate (*0.336): 2585.3

Effectiveness:
(3027.8 – 2585.3) / 3027.8 = +14.6%

I find that still shockingly low, but does not (yet?) show a negative effectiveness.

Ofcourse any vaxx side effects are not showing up and are skewing the results torwards the vaxx. The heavier and more numerous the side effects, the more these numbers are skewed for the vaxx.

It’s a crime of itself, that the media are not pressuring politics and big pharma to work with correct numbers and use correct statistical methods, instead of fearmongering.

The damage, by covering for the huge pharmaceutical sector’s products and the economically and socially devastating political measures cannot be overstated.

The MSM do not know, what kind of MONSTER they have helped to create.
Instead of doing hteir job, they are calling for more censorship to remove their independent competition.

Big Pharma has become even more influential and powerful than before. And they have their backs covered by journalism.

A HUGE DANGER for humanity and the stupid politicians and journalists do not have the slightest idea, whgat they have done.

umcus
umcus
Reply to  Knowi
3 years ago

Table 3 of the UK Health Security Agency Vaccine Surveillance report, published November 11th 2021, shows the number of recorded infections by vaccination status between week 41 and week 44 of 2021. It also shows the confirmed case rate among persons fully vaccinated, and rates among persons not vaccinated per 100,000 people.

Knowi
Knowi
Reply to  umcus
3 years ago

Correct. But they prefer to work with the incorrect method of adding up the vaxxed and unvaxxed group to create sensationalist numbers…
Which is sad, because these experimental gene therapies are dangerously enough.

Cynthia Lindstedt
Cynthia Lindstedt
3 years ago

Excellent article based on FACT. The graphs are most helpful. Thank you for your trustworthy news! -from a retired journalist alarmed by and weary of the rampant censorship and propaganda.

Bob G
Bob G
2 years ago

Why aren’t the purveyors of this murdering madness behind bars? Are the people responsible trying to outdo Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot combined?