Latest News

Pharma Liability Shields Could Be at Risk if Fraud is Found, says Former Blackrock Investment Executive

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

If Pfizer and the FDA do not release the data on their clinical trials, former Blackrock & Hedge Fund Guru Edward Dowd says he is assuming fraud, and Fraud Eviscerates all Contracts, that’s case-law.

Dowd says that big pharma is supposed to be one of the most regulated industries, particularly with the Food and drug administration (FDA) however, after touting that the jabs are safe and also effective, their blanket immunity from liability may no longer apply if fraud is found to have occurred.

This could be game over for companies such as Moderna and other mRNA manufacturers, as big insurance is prepping to “square off” with big pharma over life insurance pay-outs linked to the COVID gene therapy jab, according to the Equity Investment Executive Edward Dowd.

Pfizer received blanket immunity from liability through the EUA, however, it is looking like this product is deadly according to Dowd, yet it is others who are being financially burdened.

Insurance Companies See 40% Rise In Deaths

We are seeing many incidences of deaths and disabilities from these vaccines from the adverse events databases such as VAERs, but according to Dowd, “now the actuarial insurance companies are seeing in their results”.

Aegon insurance in their third-quarter results in their U.S unit saw an increase in death claims from 31 million in 2020 to 111 million in 2021, that’s an increase of approximately 268 percent and according to Dowd, “It is not just a medical scam it is a financial and capital market scam.”

On August 23, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) approved the PfizerBioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, for individuals 16 years of age and older. Four days later, a Freedom of Information Act Request was submitted.

The FDA asserted that the Pfizer product “meets the high standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality”, although, numerous public health officials, media outlets, journalists, scientists, politicians, public figures have publicly raised questions regarding the sufficiency of the data and information, the adequacy of the review, and the appropriateness of the analyses relied upon by the FDA to license the Pfizer Vaccine (source).

Nevertheless, despite their commitment to ”transparency”, It appears that the FDA has been reluctant to share the necessary data and even attempted to challenge the FOIA in court, with a request to release 500 pages a month, which allow all files to be accessed around 2076.

This, it could be argued, is a tad suspicious as the FDA themselves were able to deem the gene therapy jab worthy of an Emergency Use Authorisation after only 108 days of sifting through Pfizer data (source).

FOIA Compliance Was Ordered

Nonetheless, even within the first batch released we could see that both Pfizer and the FDA knew that the jab was anything but “safe and effective”.

This was seen in their released document – Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Records Reports, which shows that within the first 90 days of the vaccine’s roll out under the FDA’s EUA – from December 1st. 2020 – February 28th, 2021 – there were tens of thousands of reported adverse reactions, including over 1200 deaths (source).

The report only included adverse events to the vaccine that researchers considered “serious cases,” there were thousands more submissions that were left out of this data.

The report states that in all there were a total of 42,086 case reports of individuals who had an adverse reaction to Pfizer’s vaccine worldwide, with the largest number (13,739) coming from the United States and from the UK (13,404).

As required by Congress, the FDA may only license vaccines that have been proven to be “safe and effective (Source). This alone, surely, should have been reason enough to put a stop to the administration of the product and reason to be alarmed that congress and the FDA deemed it “safe” for EUA approval.

What Are They Trying to Hide?

Yes, this has already been reported, however, it bears repeating for perspective here. If this was the information from only a fraction of data, which in itself is shocking what else is Pfizer hiding in the data?

The FDA and Pfizer are reluctant to forward more data, stating that “such records can be expected to contain both confidential business and trade secret information of Pfizer or BioNTech and personal privacy information of patients who participated in clinical trials.” (source)

However, they should be urgently compelled to produce the results of the clinical trials in their entirety for the safety of the public, many of which are children.

As they are reluctant to do so, as Edward Dowd says, we may assume fraud and with the already known adverse events and deaths resulting from their gene therapy jab, how can we not?

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Latest News

5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

34 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Peter Westwood
Peter Westwood
7 months ago

Big insurers and big pharma are all owned by the same hedge funds (as the largest stakeholders), Vanguard, State Street and Black Rock. Their money derives from banksters, royals and other mobsters.
Big insurers will not “square off” against big pharma, just as “Russia” won’t square off against anybody unless the same mobsters want a war.
This is all theatre.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Peter Westwood
7 months ago

I agree. The man is / was from Black Rock, already suspicious. Will they scarify Bill Gates and some more to save themselves? Or what the purpose of the recent circus and stepping back on vax pass and other mandates?

Last edited 7 months ago by GundelP
Novus Ordo Seclorum
Novus Ordo Seclorum
7 months ago

Come on, we’re doing a very good job at Schizer as shown in the below 1 minute video. We just need more time to release our trial data – 75 years should do for sure:

 https://librti.com/page/view-video?id=1438

Please contact our CEO directly if you need some favor from us.

burro
burro
7 months ago

it should be now clear, we live in a criminal mafia system that calls himself democracy. I don’t think there is a functional justice system in a criminal finance system. lets say blackrock sacrifice pfizer and also the others. Anyone think the money of pfizer and the others will go to the people. No it wont. And the sacrifice of blackrock will wash him of any guilt. It’s always the same they push and look how much we resist. If it’s to much they stop pushing and after a time they try again. And if we don’t resist they go and push more. resistance needs time and consciousness. I have and take the time and thank you for your contribution to my consciosness. thx

Novus Ordo Seclorum
Novus Ordo Seclorum
Reply to  burro
7 months ago

In the 90s they used to kill people around the globe while hiding themselves from their victims. Today, they do it in the open:

“We lied, we cheated, we stole”: Pompeo (former US Secretary of State) offers honest, if disturbing admission about CIA activity.For those who haven’t researched how the global economy works here is a summary:

The US prints $ out of thin air to buy physical goods around the world. The only way such a scam can survive is that all countries accept US papers in exchange for their labor – if not their leaders are slaughtered: Khadafi (Libya), Saddam Hussein (Iraq), Lumumba (DR Congo), Krumah (Ghana), Sukarno (Indonesia), etc… They just have to start a “humanitarian war” to get the job done.

Blackrock and Vanguard are the middle men that buy the world with the Federal Reserve’s vaporware (call it money if that’s fine with you).

Last edited 7 months ago by Novus Ordo Seclorum
Paul Waterhouse
Paul Waterhouse
7 months ago

Besides fraud, would gross negligence in the original request for emergency approval also invalidate the liability shield? It’s actually poor and invalid analysis to present the efficacy ratio from the trials as being sufficient or meaningful as an indication of how well the vaccine worked on the test population over the observation period as exposure to catching the virus was not controlled for and no data was collected during the observation period with regard to actual exposure. Anyone teaching mathematics to A-level or higher should be capable of spotting this immediately. And a reasonable expectation would be that those conducting a trial and deciding about emergency use applications would be required to have at least that level of mathematical ability.

Truthbknown
Truthbknown
7 months ago

Fraud was proven they day they asked for 95 years to release their records!

Lesley Shurlock
Lesley Shurlock
7 months ago

The data have to be released. Science requires the free sharing of data. Without it nobody can claim anything because they cannot back it up.

The problem arises when false data are invented to create the result the company want. We have seen how Pfizer have given false data in the past when they did not count a huge batch of data which would have greatly altered their published result as the Editor of the bmj showed.

Until we have a system whereby all Labs collecting data under medically scientific experiments for new drugs are monitored at every level of the data collection by an independend body which also releases the data, we can never be sure that we are given honestly proven, safe, effective medical treatments.

trackback
7 months ago

[…] BY PATRICIA HARRITY, The Exposé, JANUARY 31, 2022 […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Pharma Liability Shields Could Be at Risk if Fraud is Found, says Former Blackrock Investment Execu… […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] – Pharma Liability Shields Could Be at Risk if Fraud is Found, says Former Blackrock Investment Execut… […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] January 31, 2022Pharma Liability Shields Could Be at Risk if Fraud is Found, says Former Blackrock Investment Execu… […]

Pete
Pete
7 months ago

“Willful misconduct” is included as an out of the “Prep Act”…

Willful misconduct is everywhere with this iteration of a “pandemic”…

Yesterday a “trusted” news source now calls them “local” pandemics…

trackback
7 months ago

[…] ! Pharma Liability Shields Could Be at Risk if Fraud is Found, says Former Blackrock Investment Execu…   BY PATRICIA […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] News) Edward Dowd means business. The former Blackrock executive and hedge fund guru has said that if Pfizer and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) refuse to release all data on Wuhan […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] News) Edward Dowd means business. The former Blackrock executive and hedge fund guru has said that if Pfizer and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) refuse to release all data on Wuhan […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Edward Dowd habla en serio. El exejecutivo de Blackrock y gurú de los fondos de cobertura ha dicho que si Pfizer y la Administración de Drogas y Alimentos de los EE. UU. (FDA) se niegan a publicar […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] News) Edward Dowd means business. The former Blackrock executive and hedge fund guru has said that if Pfizer and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) refuse to release all data on Wuhan […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] finanční guru investiční firmy Blackrock & Hedge Fund Edward Dowd nedávno učinil rezonující […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Dowd means business. The former Blackrock executive and hedge fund guru has said that if Pfizer and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) refuse to release all data on […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Dowd habla en serio. El exejecutivo de Blackrock y gurú de los fondos de cobertura ha dicho que si Pfizer y la Administración de Drogas y Alimentos de los EE. UU. (FDA) se niegan a publicar […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Pharma Liability Shields Could Be at Risk if Fraud is Found, says Former Blackrock Investment Executiveby rightsfreedomshttps://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2022/02/03/pharma-liability-shields-could-be-at-risk-if-fraud-is-found-says-former-blackrock-investment-executive/BY PATRICIA HARRITY ON JANUARY 31, 2022  […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Dowd habla en serio. El exejecutivo de Blackrock y gurú de los fondos de cobertura ha dicho que si Pfizer y la Administración de Drogas y Alimentos de los EE. UU. (FDA) se niegan a publicar […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Dowd habla en serio. El exejecutivo de Blackrock y gurú de los fondos de cobertura ha dicho que si Pfizer y la Administración de Drogas y Alimentos de los EE. UU. (FDA) se niegan a publicar […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] However, if Pfizer are found to have been fraudulent it eviscerates all contracts which will mean that liability from vaccine damage will rest firmly with them (Source). […]

Giant Meteor
Giant Meteor
7 months ago

Well, Edward Dowd, just who, exactly would be prosecuting the criminal Big Pharma Jab makers? No one in the Just Us Dept would do it. UN Criminal Court isn’t going to do it. Yes, Fraud does negate contracts, but first one has to have somebody step up to the plate. And I do not see that happening.

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Patricia Haritti piše : “Ako Pfizer i FDA ne objave podatke o svojim kliničkim ispitivanjima, bivši guru Blackrock & Hedge fonda Edward Dowd kaže da pretpostavlja prijevaru, a prijevara uništava sve ugovore, to je sudska praksa”. […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Pharma Liability Shields Could Be at Risk if Fraud is Found, says Former Blackrock Investment Execut…, 31 January 2022 […]