Breaking News

Hidden Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine Trial Data suggests all Pregnant Vaccinated Women Miscarried

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
What Doctors Want Pregnant Women to Know About Getting the ...

A lawsuit filed by Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency produced documents from Pfizer revealing that its Covid-19 vaccine caused all of the pregnant women in its trial to miscarry.

The report, titled “Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports,” describes events reported up to February 2021 and shows that not a single pregnant woman who took the Pfizer vaccine delivered a live baby.

Table 6 of the report, titled “Missing Information,” reveals under the first topic of “Use in pregnancy and lactation” the following statement:

“Pregnancy outcomes for the 270 pregnancies were reported as spontaneous abortion (23), outcome pending (5), premature birth with neonatal death, spontaneous abortion with intrauterine death (2 each), spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and normal outcome (1 each). No outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies (note that 2 different outcomes were reported for each twin, and both were counted).

This suggests that of 270 pregnancies, there were 23 spontaneous abortions, five “outcomes pending,” two premature births with neonatal death, two spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death, one spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and one normal outcome. However, there is also that tricky statement: “no outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies.”

One outlet reported: “We have no idea what happened with 243 (5 + 238) of the pregnancies of these injected women; they have just not been included in the report.

“What we do know is that of 27 reported pregnancies (270 subtract 243), there are 28 dead babies! This appears to mean that someone was pregnant with twins and that 100 percent of the unborn babies died.”

It is possible that the five “outcomes pending” may have resulted in a normal and healthy delivery, but this remains unclear. This means, that at best, 87.5 percent of babies within fully vaccinated wombs died as opposed to 100 percent.

Regardless, this is still an incredibly horrific and disgusting outcome. No babies should be dying as a result of these “safe and effective” vaccines, and no mother should be harmed in the process.

Pfizer sneakily attempted to cover this up with an article titled “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine,” which was published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) on Dec. 31, 2020.

Share this page to Telegram
5 4 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

59 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Leeann Mitchell
Leeann Mitchell
7 months ago

[ JOIN US ]
 I get paid more than $120 to $850 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $ 24 360 from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…
more details…….. http://Www.NETCash1.Com

Last edited 7 months ago by Leeann Mitchell
David Margison
David Margison
7 months ago

I’m not at all sure how your getting 87.5% of babies died when you say 270 pregnacies outcomes were not reported ? You do say that 27 pregnancies ended with the deaths of the unborn babies, which if true is shocking. But your own figures do not support your assertion that 100% or 87.5% of pregnancies in the trial resulted in the deaths of all babies. Statements like these are not helpful. My son and his fully vaccinated wife had healthy twins in December.

alex
alex
Reply to  David Margison
7 months ago

Healthy at the moment……….

CindyBarnett
CindyBarnett
Reply to  alex
7 months ago

I am making a real GOOD MONEY ($550 to $750 / hr) online from my laptop. Last month I GOT chek of nearly 85000$, this online work is simple and straightforward, don’t have to go OFFICE, Its home q online job. You become independent after joining this JOB. I really thanks to my FRIEND who refer me this SITE…..,
>>>>>>> http://Www.SmartPay1.com

Last edited 7 months ago by CindyBarnett
JaxFinn
JaxFinn
Reply to  David Margison
7 months ago

If you look at the NEJM study referenced late in the article and actually read the data instead of just the conclusions, the data suggested that for pregnant women who received a jab in the 1st or 2nd trimesters of pregnancy 89% of the pregnancies ended in “spontaneous abortion” (miscarriage) and or stillbirth. The study has had multiple calls for retraction as it was the primary basis for the associated “safety” claims. (It may already have been retracted.)

Paul
Paul
Reply to  JaxFinn
7 months ago

That isn’t true. I read the NEJM study referenced, and it does not even mention spontaneous abortion, it says that a future study will address outcomes in pregnant women. A study addressing safety of the Pfizer vaccine was published in June last year, and found that:
“Among 827 participants who had a completed pregnancy, the pregnancy resulted in a live birth in 712 (86.1%), in a spontaneous abortion in 104 (12.6%), in stillbirth in 1 (0.1%), and in other outcomes (induced abortion and ectopic pregnancy) in 10 (1.2%).”
Those figures are well within the expected range for those negative outcomes (e.g. spontaneous abortion and stillbirth) in the general population i.e. there is no reason at all to think the vaccine has any negative effects on pregnancies..
 

bert
bert
Reply to  David Margison
7 months ago

Your son had twins? How’d he do that?

eva
eva
Reply to  David Margison
7 months ago

Enjoy those twins. They may not be here for long…

Joe Schmoe
Joe Schmoe
Reply to  David Margison
7 months ago

Margison is a shill. Stop spreading lies. The vaccines are actually gene “therapy” devices that are designed specifically to kill. GTFOH

Paul
Paul
Reply to  Joe Schmoe
7 months ago

Gene therapy changes our DNA, Since there is no possible way mRNA vaccines can change our DNA they are not gene therapy. They can’t get into the nucleus, where our DNA is, and even if they could they have no way of changing DNA. Even if they did change out DNA (they can’t), you would just have a few muscle cells with altered DNA. There is no evidence that people have been killed by the vaccine except very, very rarely.

JJH
JJH
Reply to  David Margison
7 months ago

87.5% was based on the possibility that the “5 pendent” pregnancies’ outcomes delivered healthy babies.

jessix
jessix
Reply to  David Margison
7 months ago

This would be called an INCOMPLETE STUDY. Assuming or claiming missing reports from 270 subjects meant their babies died is YELLOW JOURNALISM! Such reporting adds ammunition to the criminals who continue to cover up the reality of the danger of the Covid EXPERIMENTAL VACCINES.

Woman
Woman
Reply to  jessix
7 months ago

You’re missing the point. The article is calculating the percentage based on “reported” outcomes. Meaning the percentage of deaths relative to the 28.

MBB
MBB
Reply to  David Margison
7 months ago

Healthy for how long? Poor babies. Taking shots while pregnant is …

Paul
Paul
Reply to  David Margison
7 months ago

Only problems with the pregnancies were reported, since those 270 pregnancy outcomes were not reported, they were almost certainly normal live births. The background rate of spontaneous abortion is about 10%, sadly, so 27 out of 270 pregnancies ending in miscarriage is exactly what you would predict in an unvaccinated population.

Anita B. McGill
Anita B. McGill

I’m able to gain 85 US dollars per-hr. to complete few jobs on the internet. I’ve never thought like it could possible but my best pal has obtained $26,000 just in six weeks simply doing this super job also she satisfied me to try…
.
.
Visit for following link >>> http://www.MoneyStar1.com

Last edited 7 months ago by Anita B. McGill
JCHR12
JCHR12
7 months ago

Big Pharma are doing everything in their power to suppress their trial data of inadequate testing. They are goons authorized by the cabal of governments to do exactly what they have been openly telling the world: that the population must be reduced.

However, some of the conclusions here are misleading. Nevertheless, we are in the grip of utter evil, and those who haven’t get recognized this fact are too stupid for words.

Debbie Barrow
Debbie Barrow
Reply to  JCHR12
7 months ago

I guess alot of people cannot comprehend the levels of darkness we are in for these endtimes Godbless

bert
bert
Reply to  Debbie Barrow
7 months ago

99.9% never see any of this. Have you noticed the truckers in canada and how the ‘press’ are reporting it? If the 0.01% want the 99.9% to notice they need to shove it in their face, but no one bothers anymore, so you’ve already lost.

MarshaLinn
MarshaLinn
Reply to  JCHR12
7 months ago

[ Work at Home ] I get paid more than $90 to $100 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…
Here is I started.…………>>  http://Www.Self25.com

Last edited 7 months ago by MarshaLinn
trackback
7 months ago

[…] 17.  !! Hidden Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine Trial Data suggests all Pregnant Vaccinated Women Miscarried […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] February 2, 2022Hidden Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine Trial Data suggests all Pregnant Vaccinated Women Miscarried […]

Watcher Seeker
Watcher Seeker
7 months ago

Is there some contradictory information in two articles today?

See another Expose article from today – “The Billion Lives Covid-19 Fraud: The Vaccinated & Boosted have 3 years to live”

It says – “for those whom Pfizer excluded from their Phase III vaccine trials” – and in the list – “Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding”.

Pregnant women were excluded from the trails – or have I misunderstood something?

bert
bert
Reply to  Watcher Seeker
7 months ago

> have I misunderstood something

Yes. Study A was written to make you believe X and study B was written to make you believe Y. A and B are completely unrelated, as are X and Y.

According to wikipedia, the blm woman, who’s purchased millions in ‘property’ over the last year, is a saint who’s net income was ‘only’ $120,000. According to the US tax people, she’s under investigation for fraud. You see how your ‘understanding’ varies depending on who’s spouting at you?

Sarah
Sarah
Reply to  Watcher Seeker
7 months ago

I could be completely wrong here but my guess is that that they were included in phase 1 and/or phase 2 trials but removed from the phase 3 trials, possibly due to the rate of miscarriages. I had heard that pregnant women weren’t ignoramus in any of the trials but you know how ight goes these days, there seems to be 37 opposing “facts” for every question 🤦‍♀️

Paul
Paul
Reply to  Watcher Seeker
7 months ago

Pregnant and breastfeeding women were excluded during recruitment, but some women subjects got pregnant unintentionally during the trial and were monitored to see what effect the vaccine might have. Thankfully there is no evidence at all of any negative effects of the vaccine.

trackback
7 months ago

[…] – Hidden Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine Trial Data suggests all Pregnant Vaccinated Women Miscarried […]

michael
michael
7 months ago

Who is behind this FAKE GLOBAL pandemic? Who is making trillions of Dollars out of it?                https://brandnewtube.com/watch/who-is-behind-this-fake-global-pandemic-who-is-making-trillions-of-dollars-out-of-it_HtdSOHW9pDbcJ7M.html

bert
bert
Reply to  michael
7 months ago

Who is behind the above video link? Who is hoping to make trillions of dollars out of it?

(Answer: ‘michael’)

bert
bert
7 months ago

> Regardless, this is still an incredibly horrific and disgusting outcome. No babies should be dying as a result of these “safe and effective” vaccines, and no mother should be harmed in the process.

Try going to a slaughterhouse or a battery farm.

KarolFry
KarolFry
Reply to  bert
7 months ago

Google is presently paying $10447 to $13025 every month for working on the web from home. I have joined this activity 2 months back and I have earned $15248 in my first month from this activity. I can say my life is improved totally!

Look at it what I do……. http://Www.Cash46.Com

Last edited 7 months ago by KarolFry
trackback
7 months ago

[…] outcomes for the 270 pregnancies were reported as spontaneous abortion (23), outcome pending (5), premature birth with neonatal death, spontaneous abortion with intrauterine death (2 each), […]

Whitespace
Whitespace
7 months ago

You shouldn’t have such a huge distance between the text bod and a headline. For instance, I know not to send someone a link from the expose knowing that it will be accurate. With all the noise, having reliable sources of information is at a premium. Don’t shoot yourself in the foot and embarrass your readers.

haider ali
haider ali
7 months ago

My last month’s online earning was $19257 just by doing an easy job online just by doing work for maximum 2 to 3 hrs a day. I have joined this job about 3 months ago and in my first month i have made $23K+ easily without any special online experience. Everybody on this earth can get this job today and start making cash online by just follow details on this site……….

====>> https://onlinejob50.surge.sh/

johnny
johnny
7 months ago

Even if it’s 10%… This is outrageous. The DATA needs to come OUT!! The effort they are making to cover up the data makes me believe the worst case scenario is true! At this point, it only looks worse and worse.

**release the data**

luke
luke
Reply to  johnny
7 months ago

Looking to set up your own click bait site? Just put up dirty pictures – it’s a lot easier – and you’ll get 10000000 times more ‘visitors’ than a site filled with boring facts about dead mothers.

bijodoc535
bijodoc535
7 months ago

[ JOIN US ] I get paid more than £70 to £100 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily £14000 from this without having online working skills..…21 . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…
Weekly payments…… https://www.easywork2.com

Last edited 7 months ago by bijodoc535
eva
eva
7 months ago

Those idiots who decided to get jabbed while pregnant dont deserve to have babies.. so no loss…those not born souls would be better in pure land…

trackback
7 months ago

[…] February 2, 2022Hidden Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine Trial Data suggests all Pregnant Vaccinated Women Miscarried […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Hidden Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine Trial Data suggests all Pregnant Vaccinated Women Miscarried – The Expose Read more… […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Previous Hidden Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine Trial Data suggests all Pregnant Vaccinated Women Miscarried – The Expose Read more… […]

Richard Ettinger
Richard Ettinger
7 months ago

This should be released to the real media. see what you can do.

Annoyed Reader
Annoyed Reader
7 months ago

I followed a link from another site to look at this story and since your interface demanded a comment let me say.

This is the most obnoxious site I have yet run across. Get rid of all the pink banners and green popups and I might be interested in returing.

Wendy Silver
Wendy Silver
7 months ago

I donated $25 recently and would really like to be able to print your articles without any obstructions. How can I do this!

BerryRuby
BerryRuby
7 months ago

On the 4 March 2021, BBC4’s Woman’s Hour interviewed a researcher at the Harvard TH Chan US Medical School. They were conducting a clinical trial on pregnant women in India and Brazil with the Pfizer jab. Julie Woo seems to have disappeared from the institutional website now and I cant find any citation that matches that research. I wonder what the ethics application looked like, and what the outcomes were?

Dwayne Bunt
Dwayne Bunt
7 months ago

Ah, Genetics. Such a fragile thing. Father has defects then Mother has defects. It’s a f**king Miricale the child is even born at all! Then you dumsh!t$ jump in line to take a drug you know absolutely nothing about! That scrambles your DNA. I am not here for money! What happens when this one choice kills your next child? The one you really want. What then?

Shoah Kahn
Shoah Kahn
7 months ago

No refunds, I’m afraid ¯\_(v_v)_/¯

T-rex32
T-rex32
7 months ago

Pretty odd that Phizer supported and paid for this trial.

Jackie Daytona
Jackie Daytona
7 months ago

We also don’t have a “versus placebo” data set for this information either which is critical to basic, proper methodology.

I saw this data a while back and I wondered about the same questions the author is asking here. It’s very, very troubling data, especially in light of the fact that it did not stop EUA approval.

It does not take that much effort to track down the status of 270 expectant mothers. Something smells rotten here.

Anonymous
Anonymous
7 months ago

The study was from Dec 2020 – February 2021. The 238 babies were not born in the 3 months, because gestation is closer to 10 months long. The study needs to be updated now that we are beyond normal pregnancy term, but it is likely that those 238 were still pregnant as of February 2021.

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Feb 4 20:31:38 2022 (*18487022*):: +public! (*18487022*):: https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/02/hidden-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-trial-data-shows-all-pregnant-vacci… *** Hidden Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine Trial Data suggests all Pregnant Vaccinated Women Miscarried *** […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Horrible outcomes for vaxxed pregnant women and their babies, https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/02/hidden-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-trial-data-shows-all-pregnant-vacci… […]

Richard
Richard
7 months ago

Is this not genocide?

trackback
7 months ago

[…] The Expose 2 February 2022 […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Hidden Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine Trial Data suggests all Pregnant Vaccinated Women Miscarried (link). […]