Breaking News

Exhaustive proof Moderna made Covid-19

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Covid-19 is a manmade virus, and Moderna Inc., the American pharmaceutical and biotechnology company that has made billions through the sale of an experimental Covid-19 injection, is responsible for creating it. Don’t believe us? Then read the exhaustive evidence below and check for yourself.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here


By a concerned reader who is a qualified cell biologist

STEP 0: The genome, the complete genetic code of Covid19 is found here – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_045512.2/  The genome of Bat Coronavirus RaTG13 is found here – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN996532 

One can compare these two genomes, letter by letter using the BLAST Genome alignment comparison tool at https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PAGE_TYPE=BlastSearch&BLAST_SPEC=blast2seq&LINK_LOC=align2seq 

Just put NC_045512.2 in the Query Sequence Box and MN996532 in the Subject Sequence Box. Then choose the radio button:: More dissimilar sequences (discontinguous megablast). Then hit BLAST. Then when the results appear (a few second later) choose the Alignments tab and you will see both genomes compared perfectly. For the entire comparison see here

A is the base Adeninie
C is the base Cytosine
G is the base Gaumine
T is the base Thymine (not Thiamine which is a Vitamin added to Cornflakes)

The two genomes (full genetic codes) are 96% Identical. Here are all the differences…

There are 995 instances of a 1 letter mismatch
There are 24 instances of a 2 letter mismatch
There are 4 instances of a 3 letter mismatch
There are no further mismatches

There are 2 instances of a 1 letter omission at lines numbered 27341 and 29800.
There are 2 instances of a 2 letter omission at lines numbered 22981 and 23038 
There are 2 instances of a 3 letter omission at lines numbered 3301 and 26504
There is one instance of a 12 letter omission at line numbered 23576
There are no further omissions.

Here are all the omissions –

And that is it. There are no further differences. The overall match is 28723 letters out of 29877(96%). The total numbers of gap letters is 24 (12+3+3+2+2+1+1).

Natural mutations normally occur one letter at a time. So to determine whether or not Covid19 is man made we just have to look at the 12 letter gap, which is way too large for a series of random mutations that just happened to occur right next to each other in a 29877 letter genome, and all in the 6 years between 2013 (when RatG13 was sequenced) and 2019 when Covid-19 appeared. So the extra 12 letters, the extra 12 bases, the extra 12 nucleotides (base + sugar + phosphate) were inserted from another genome, either by nature or by man.

Each 3 letter group (called a codon) codes for one amino acid. So the inserted group in whole codons is actually…

TCT CCT CGG CGG GCA which codes for SPRRA (Serine, Proline, aRginine, aRginine, Alanine).

But the Furin Cleavage Site is PRRAR which includes the next Codon CGT which also codes for aRginine (R).

So the only difference between Covid-19 and RaTG13 which involves more than 3 nucleotides (more than one complete 3 letter Codon) is the Furin Cleavage Site which involves 12 nucleotides and parts of 5 Codons (15 nucleotides).

STEP 1: Run a BLAST virus search https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/virus/vssi/#/ to see if this sequence (TCTCCTCGGCGGGCA) occurs in any virus in nature other than Covid19. Answer: It does not.

Search also for CTCCTCGGCGGGCA – Answer: It does not occur in any natural virus.. One cannot search just for the 12 letters CCTCGGCGGGCA because the search must have 14 letters minimum for some reason.

Search also for CCTCGGCGGGCACGT which codes for PRRAR, the famous Furin Cleavage site, which gives Covid-19 its gain of function infectivity – Answer: It does not occur in any natural virus. 

STEP 2: Run a Patent BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi choose ‘Blastn’ and make sure ‘align 2 or more sequences’ is unchecked and choose patent sequences) search of every patent application for the 14 nucleotide sequence CTCCTCGGCGGGCA which is the 12 nucleotide insert plus the rest of the final 3 letter codon, the next two letters. We have to do this because the BLAST searches need a minimum of 14 letters. You cannot do a BLAST search for 12 nucleotides. In the Algorithm Parameters section set max targets to 5000.

Here are the results…

US5606032A: Process for preparing glial mitogenic factors
Description: The most disgusting imaginable method of obtaining a 745 base pair sequence of DNA from Bovine pituitary glands which has the wonderful capability of stimulating the division of rat Schwann cells in when resident in fetal calf blood plasma.

Inventor: Andrew Goodearl, Paul Stroobant, Luisa Minghetti, Michael Waterfield, Mark Marchioni, Mario S. Chen, Ian Hiles
Current Assignee: Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd, Acorda Therapeutics Inc 

1991-04-10: Priority to GB919107566A
1995-06-06: Application filed by Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd, Cenes Pharmaceuticals Inc
1997-02-25: Application granted and published
2017-02-25: PATENT EXPIRED

So the first patented appearance of the 14 nucleotide insertion was in a 745 nucleotide sequence extracted from Cow’s pituitary glands and published in 1997 at the beginning of the public internet!

US5958721A: Methods for screening of substances for therapeutic activity and yeast for use therein 
Inventor: Christopher John Marshall, Alan Ashworth, David Anthony Hughes
1993-04-07: Priority to British Patent GB9307250
1994-03-31: Application filed by Cancer Research Campaign Technology Ltd
1999-09-28: Application granted and published
2099-09-28: PATENT EXPIRED

Description: Candidate pharmaceuticals for use in treatment of cancer, inflammatory disorders, cardio-vascular disorders or neurological disease. – Pretty much all the side effects of mRNA vaccines !

They used the mammalian MAPKK (Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase Kinase) gene sequence (containing the 14 nucleotide insert sequence) in yeast to screen for anti cancer capability. They did not use it in a virus.

US6074828A: Amino acid transporters and uses 
Description: DNA encoding human amino acid transporters.

Inventor: Susan G. Amara, Jeffrey L. Arriza
Current Assignee: Oregon Health Science University 

1998-03-17: Application filed by Oregon Health Science University
2000-06-13: Application granted and published
2020-06-13: PATENT EXPIRED

So the 14 nucleotide sequence exists in humans as well as cows.

US6833447B1: Myxococcus xanthus (a bacterium) genome sequences and uses thereof 
Inventor: Barry S. Goldman, Gregory J. Hinkle, Steven C. Slater, Roger C. Wiegand, 
2001-07-10: Application filed by Monsanto Technology LLC
2002-01-11: Assigned to MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC
2004-12-21: Application granted and published

So the 14 nucleotide gene sequence  exists in humans, in cows, and in bacteria. And it has been used in yeast. 

Patent monopolies last for 20 years. So some of these monopolies granted on a novel use of naturally occurring DNA from humans, cows and bacteria, expired before Covid19 came along. But it was actually the British who started isolating and using DNA containing the 14 base pair insert first – woops! 

STEP 3: In order to make the sequence into a Furin cleavage site which gives the virus its infectivity, we must add the final Arginine codon CGT and get the 17 nucleotide sequence CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGT, which we call the double CGG coded furin cleavage site insert. 

We now run a BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi choose ‘Blastn’ make sure ‘align 2 or more sequences’ is unchecked and choose patent sequences) of every patent application for the 17 nucleotide Furin Cleavage Site sequence CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGT. Here are all the 100% match results (dated before the arrival of Covid19 in October 2019.

US9587003B2: Modified polynucleotides for the production of oncology-related proteins and peptides  – https://patents.google.com/patent/US9587003B2/en 
Inventor: Stephane Bancel, Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles, Sayda M. Elbashir, Matthias John, Atanu Roy, Susan Whoriskey, Kristy M. Wood, Paul Hatala, Jason P. Schrum, Kenechi Ejebe, Jeff Lynn Ellsworth, Justin Guild
Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc 
2012-04-02 Priority to US201261618868P
2016-02-04 Application filed by ModernaTx Inc
2017-03-07 Application granted and published

US9301993B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding apoptosis inducing factor 1 – https://patents.google.com/patent/US9301993B2/en
Inventor: Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles
Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc 
2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc
2016-04-05 Application granted and published
2020-01-10 First worldwide family litigation filed

US9255129B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding SIAH E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 – https://patents.google.com/patent/US9255129B2/en
Inventor: Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles
Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc 
2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc
2016-02-09 Application granted and published

US9216205B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding granulysin – https://patents.google.com/patent/US9216205B2/en
Inventor: Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles
Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc 
2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc
2015-12-22 Application granted and published

US9149506B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding septin-4 – https://patents.google.com/patent/US9149506B2/en
Inventor: Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles
Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc 
2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc
2015-10-06 Application granted and published
2020-01-10 First worldwide family litigation filed

Sequence 11651 from patent US 9149506
Sequence ID: HL240349.1
Range 1: 2762 to 2778
Plus/Minus (this means the match is for the reverse compliment of the sequence which is CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGT because A bonds with T and C bonds with G.

US9024113B2: Polynucleotides for expression of microbial starch branching enzymes in plants for production of plants with improved yield 
Inventor: Yongwei Cao, Gregory J. Hinkle, Steven C. Slater, Xianfeng Chen, Barry S. Goldman, Current Assignee: Monsanto Technology LLC 
2007-10-29: Application filed by Monsanto Technology LLC
2014-04-18: Assigned to MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC
2015-05-05: Application granted and published

Monsanto used the sequence to genetically modify plants, not humans.

US8952217B2: Process for decreasing verbascose in a plant by expression of a chloroplast-targeted fimD protein 
Inventor: Piotr Puzio, Birgit Wendel, Michael Manfred Herold, Ralf Looser, Astrid Blau, Gunnar Plesch, Beate Kamlage, Florian Schauwecker
Current Assignee: BASF Metabolome Solutions GmbH 
2006-09-06: Application filed by Metanomics GmbH
2015-02-10: Application granted and published

BASF used the gene sequence for the Genetic Modification of plants.

US8372601B2: Compositions and methods for the synthesis of APPA-containing peptides (as antibiotics) 
Inventor: William W. Metcalf, Wilfred A. van der Donk, Junkal Zhang, Benjamin T. Circello, 
Svetlana A. Borisova
Current Assignee: University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign 
2011-01-21: Application filed by University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
2011-02-28: Assigned to NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN 
SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
2011-05-13: Assigned to UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN
2013-02-12: Application granted and published

“Exemplary vectors suitable for replication in mammalian cells may include viral replicons, or sequences that ensure integration of an embodiment of the isolated nucleic acid of the present disclosure into the host genome. Suitable vectors may include, for example, those derived from simian virus SV40, retroviruses, bovine papilloma virus, vaccinia virus, and adenovirus”

“Expression of proteins encoded by an embodiment of the isolated nucleic acid of the present  disclosure then occurs in cells or animals which are infected with the live recombinant  vaccinia virus.”

This patent is about manufacturing proteins containing the amino acid sequence APPA. Covid19 does contain that sequence but not in the spike protein, which has the furin cleavage site. The patent claims DNA similar to Patent gene sequences 2,3,4 and 5-13. Whereas the Furin Cleavage site occurs in Patent gene sequence 14. So it is incidental to the patent. 

US7635798B2: Nucleic acid compositions conferring altered metabolic characteristics 
Description: This invention encompasses the identification and isolation genes and gene fragments that confer altered metabolic characteristics in Nicotiana benthamiana plants, when expressed using GENEWARE™ viral vectors.
Inventor: Thaddeus Weglarz, Daniel Gachotte, Beth Blakeslee, Ignacio Larrinua, David A. McCrery, Randy J. Pell, J. Vincent B. Oriedo, Barbara A. Miller, Avutu S. Reddy, Vipula Shukla, Rodney Crosley
2002-08-30: Application filed by Dow AgroSciences LLC
2004-10-01: Assigned to DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, THE
2005-01-14: Assigned to DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC
2009-12-22: Application granted and published

Dow Agrisciences was using viruses to Genetically modify Tobacco plants.

US7314974B2: Expression of microbial proteins in plants for production of plants with improved properties 

Inventor: Yongwei Cao, Gregory J. Hinkle, Steven C. Slater, Xianfeng Chen, Barry S. Goldman
2003-02-20: Application filed by Monsanto Technology LLC
2003-08-25: Assigned to MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC
2008-01-01: Application granted and published

Monsanto used the gene sequence in their genetic modification of plants not humans or viruses.

US6869788B2: DNA encoding novel D-aminoacylase and process for producing D-amino acid by using the same 
Inventor: Masami Osabe, Katsuyuki Takahashi, Toshifumi Yamaki, Teruo Arii, Toshihiro Oikawa
2002-02-01: Application filed by Mitsui Chemicals Inc
2002-09-30: Assigned to MITSUI CHEMICALS, INC.
2005-03-22: Application granted and published

Not to do with viruses.

STEP 4: Run a BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi chose Blastn make sure ‘align 2 or more sequences’ is unchecked and chose patent sequences) of every patent application for the 15 nucleotide Furin Cleavage Site sequence CCTCGGCGGGCACGT, which codes for PRRAR, Here are all the 100% new match results.

US6833447B1: Myxococcus xanthus (a bacterium) genome sequences and uses thereof 
Inventor: Barry S. Goldman, Gregory J. Hinkle, Steven C. Slater, Roger C. Wiegand, 
2001-07-10: Application filed by Monsanto Technology LLC
2002-01-11: Assigned to MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC
2004-12-21: Application granted and published

The usual Monsanto team. So the CGG coded Furin Cleavage Site does exist in bacteria in nature, but not in viruses in nature.

US6912470B2: Genes and proteins involved in the biosynthesis of enediyne ring structures 
Inventor: Chris M. Farnet, Alfredo Staffa, Emmanuel Zazopoulos, 
Current Assignee: Thallion Pharmaceuticals Inc 
2002-05-21: Application filed by Ecopia Biosciences Inc
2005-06-28: Application granted and published

Enediyne rings are cancer torpedoes. Ecopia were trying to improve the functionality and production of these torpedoes, which are not proteins. . 

US7314974B2: Expression of microbial proteins in plants for production of plants with improved properties  (Transgenic Plants)

Inventor: Yongwei Cao, Gregory J. Hinkle, Steven C. Slater, Xianfeng Chen, Barry S. Goldman
2003-02-20: Application filed by Monsanto Technology LLC
2003-08-25: Assigned to MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC
2008-01-01: Application granted and published

US7750207B2: Transgenic plants: 
Inventor: Kunsheng Wu, Santanu Dasgupta, Targolli L Jayaprakash, Shoba Cherian
Current Assignee: Monsanto Technology LLC 
2006-09-01: Application filed by Monsanto Technology LLC
2010-07-06: Application granted and published

US7834146B2: Recombinant Polypetides Associated with Plants
Description: The Polypeptides may be promoted in the plants through Plant viruses such as the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus.
Inventor: David K. Kovalic, Yihua Zhou, Yongwei Cao, Scott E. Andersen, Michael D. Edgerton, Jingdong Liu
Current Assignee: Monsanto Technology LLC 
2004-01-29: Application filed by Monsanto Technology LLC
2010-11-16: Application granted and published

So Ecopia was the first to file a human therapeutic use of the double CCG Furin Cleavage site insert in the form of better Enediyne ring cancer torpedoes on 2002May21
Dow Agrisciences was the first to file a patent to use it in a plant virus in 2002August30
The University of Illinois was the first to file a patent for the use the double CGG Furin Cleavage Site insert in a human virus on 2011January21. But they were trying to make APPA containing proteins as antibiotics. The Furin Cleavage Site was incidental to their patent. 
Moderna is the only other outfit to file a human use of the insert before 2019. They filed 5 patents using the insert from 2013December16 to 2016February4. They were the last 5 patents filed using it before Covid19 broke out in October 2019.

STEP 5: Run a BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi chose Blastn make sure ‘align 2 or more sequences’ is unchecked and chose all genomes and choose complete genomes) search of microbes for the 15 nucleotide Furin Cleavage Site sequence CCTCGGCGGGCACGT, which codes for PRRAR. It finds more than a thousand bacteria known to have this gene sequence! Myxococcus Xanthus has it 209 times!

So over a thousand bacteria have multiple copies of it. Humans have it. Cows have it. Plants have it. But no viruses have it at all except Covid19. 

If nature was going to give it to viruses it would have done it by now, like it did with humans, like it did with cows, like it did with bacteria and like it did with plants..

Covid-19 was Man Made

The final codon completed inserted gene sequence CTCCTCGGCGGGCA does not exist in natural viruses and neither does the CGG coded Furin Cleavage site CCTCGGCGGGCACGT which codes for PRRAR. But they do exist naturally in bacteria and in humans and in cows and in plants. Viruses can invade bacteria and insert their genes into the them. But bacteria cannot insert their genes into viruses. So the only way for bacterial DNA to end up in a virus is by human intervention. So Covid19 must have been man made. 

Profs Romeu and Olle

The Double CGG Codon used in the Moderna Specific Furin Cleavage site does not occur in any other Furin cleavage site in any other virus in nature. Furin cleavage sites do occur in other viruses but NOT at all in other betacoronaviruses like Covid-19 and NOT at all with the double CGG codon..

Arginine (R), can be encoded by any of the 6 triplets: AGG, AGA, CGA, CGC, CGG, CGT. In Covid-19, the furin site (PRRA), has 12 nucleotides (3 x 4). In Covid-19, the RR doublet of the furin site is encoded by CGG-CGG.  

Two Biochemists Prof Antonio R. Romeu and Assistant Prof Enric Ollé analysed the RR doublet from a large sample of furin cleavage sites of several kinds of viruses. They found that there were no RR doublets encoded by the CGG-CGG codons in any virus in nature. They observed that the AGA triplet was the majority codon involved in these viral RR doublets. In all genetic recombination (where a part of one genome merges with another genome), the donor code is passed to the acceptor. But there is simply NO KNOWN VIRUS with a Moderna Specific Furin Cleavage Site (having the CGG-CGG codon pair) that exists to donate a Moderna Specific furin cleavage site to Covid19. So the only way that sequence could get into Covid-19 is from man.

But it gets worse.

The Spanish Profs decided to analyse the arginine codon usage in every single protein in Covid-19. The found the following…
AGG (13%)
AGA (45%)
CGA (5%)
CGC (10%)
CGG (3%)
CGT (24%). 

So the AGA codon triplet was the majority, and interestingly, CGG was the minority codon for Arginine in the virus. 

But it gets worse still.

In the specific case of S protein, of the 42 Arginines (R) it has, 20 are encoded by AGA, and only 2 by CGG. These 2 of course, are the two in the Moderna Specific Furin Cleavage Site.

So the only Arginine in the spike protein that is encoded a la Moderna are in the Furin Cleavage site. The other 40 instances do not use CGG at all. 

They then go on to comment that each individual species in nature has its own codon preferences. Obviously viruses like AGA, and do not like CGG at all, in nature.

But guess which species does use CGG for Arginine more than the other 5 competing codons – yes its jolly old homo sapiens. Our coding preferences for Arginine are

AGG (20%)
AGA (20%)
CGA (11%)
CGC (19%)
CGG (21%)
CGT (9%).

So the CGG codon in the furin cleavage site WILL have come about through Chimeric (human animal combination) gain of function research. 

Was it Moderna or Someone else?

From our exhaustive patent searches we see that only Moderna and the University of Illinois and Ecopia Biosciences Inc  were involved in human virus research using the double CGG Furin cleavage site. The University of Illinois was interested in the sequence APPA not PRRAR and they did not claim anything from the genome containing the double CGG coded PRRAR sequence. 

Ecopia Biosciences was making Enediyne rings which are not proteins, but are cancer torpedoes which can be delivered by viruses . Whereas we know the Moderna’s research led to their mRNA vaccines against Covid19. So they are the only candidate doing research in precisely the right area. They filed their first patent containing the double CGG coded Furin Cleavage site on 2013December16 and they filed the last 5 patents citing the double CGG insert before the Covid19 pandemic began. 

Furthermore of all the patents citing the insert, only the Moderna Patents match the entire 19 nucleotide sequence CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG in Covid19. No other patents filed before Covid19 arrived have the entire 19 letter sequence.

Moderna cite 7 patents on their website at https://www.modernatx.com/patents for their gene therapy mRNA-1273 (amino acid chain) vaccine… 
US 10,703,789 filed January 12 2019
US 10,702,600 filed February 28 2020
US 10,577,403 filed June 12 2019
US 10,442,756 filed December 18 2017
US 10,266,485 filed June 11 2018
US 10,064,959 filed April 21 2017
US 9,868,692 filed July 27, 2017

The 2nd patent, filed on February 28 2020 was a continuation of an earlier patent application number 16/368,270 which was filed on March 28, 2019 

So they had all 7 patents applied for by June12, 2019, which is quite impressive given that the WHO was only informed of a pneumonia type outbreak in Wuhan on December 31, 2019. 

So all the patents needed to protect Moderna’s particular vaccine monopoly were applied for 4 months before the outbreak of the disease that the vaccine is supposed to be curing.

Nature has had certainly 100,000 years to make human viruses and it never once put a double CGG furin cleavage site into any virus. Yet within 6 years of Moderna referring to it in their patents, we find it in Covid-19 in circumstances where Moderna is working on a vaccine for that virus. So just there the probability is not 100,000 to 6 or 16,666 to 1 that Moderna is responsible rather than nature. No it is 100% because nature has not done it in a virus. It never has and there is no evidence that it ever will. 

It is man that mixes up human and viral Arginine codons not nature.

US 10,703,789 Here is what the patent claims: Claim1: A pharmaceutical composition comprising:
a plurality of lipid nanoparticles comprising a cationic lipid, a neutral lipid, a cholesterol, and a PEG (polyethylene glycol) lipid, wherein the plurality of lipid nanoparticles has a mean particle size of between 80 nm and 160 nm; and wherein the lipid nanoparticles comprise an mRNA encoding a polypeptide, wherein the mRNA comprises:
(i) at least one 5′-cap structure;
(ii) a 5′-UTR (UnTranslated Region);
(iii) an open reading frame encoding the polypeptide and consisting of nucleotides including N1-methyl-pseudouridine (fake Uracil), cytosine, adenine, and guanine;
(iv) a 3′-UTR; and
(v) a poly-A region of least 100 nucleotides in length.

Claim1 is basically the finished vaccine. So in October 2019, just 4 months after 2019June12 when they got the N1 Methyl Pseudouridine (fake Uracil) patent filed, 10 hospitals in Wuhan had Coronavrius cases according to Glenn Beck’s documentary.

“We do know just about 12 months later in Wuhan – where Peter Daszak, Dr. Shi, the bat lady, and Dr Baric were all doing research on coronaviruses – about a year later, there’s an outbreak, and the outbreak actually begins according to documents that we have that have been smuggled out of China that there were 10 hospitals involved by October with patients that were now, we now know, are corona-like virus symptoms. They didn’t know what was going on. Now, that was in October”. – Glenn Beck – https://thelibertydaily.com/glenn-beck-drops-bombshells-on-tucker-nih-claims-joint-ownership-of-moderna-vaxx-started-working-on-it-long-before-pandemic/ 

So the writer can confirm, and the reader can confirm using the links above, that Moderna did apply for a Patent on the reverse compliment of the double CGG coded 15 nucleotide Furin Cleavage Site in Covid-19 and actually on the 19 nucleotide sequence containing it as described above. Furthermore they did not merely apply for a patent on 2016 February 4 with US9587003B2: as reported in the Daily Mail. They actually applied on 2013 December 16 for 4 patents with US9149506B2, US9216205B2, US9255129B2, US9301993B2:as well.

So Moderna had developed the 19 nucleotide gene sequence containing the Furin Cleavage Site which gives Covid19 its infectivity to humans by patented gain of function research as early as 2013, 6 years before the Wuhan outbreak took place. Not 3 as reported in the Mail and virally elsewhere. But the bat coronavirus RaTG13 from which Covid19 was derived was also discovered in 2013. Well, what a coincidence!

Covid Prophets?

The reason that the writer is so confident that Moderna or their agents made and leaked Covid-19 and the reason he called it as such at the start of the pandemic to almost as much ridicule as Prof Montagnier received (God bless him) is that the scriptures say in Matthew27, Mark15 and John19 that.  

29 And they (the soldiers of the governor of verse 27) platted a crown of thorns and put it upon his head, and a reed in his right hand; and they kneeled down before him, and mocked him, saying, Hail, King of the Jews!
30 And they spat upon him, and took the reed and smote him on the head. (Matthew 27 ASV)

May I therefore beg your indulgence whilst I interpret these words: 

The US department of defence funded the gene splicing of the Coronavirus of Spike Proteins (Covid-19) through NIH and NIAID and DARPA which first infected Jesus, through his fiance, the New Covenant Saints, just after he became the secular King, Caesar to those saints, the antitypical Jews, those covenanted to be angelic sons of Jacob, those born again angelically.

We calculated that the malediction which prevented Jesus becoming Caesar to the saints ended in 2019Tishri15 (October17/18). Glenn Beck did a documentary showing that 10 hospitals in Wuhan took cases with Covid19 symptoms in October 2019. Yes Folks. Covid-19 is a proof that Jesus is now secular King over the saints, the antitypical Jews, the Jews by angelic salvation covenant, at the least.

But then the soldiers spat upon him. For that is how Covid19 is transferred, through small aerosol droplets exhaled out of the mouth. The soldiers deliberately spat upon him. It was not a SALIVA LEAK! They smote Jesus on the head because the saints are the head of the church and they caught Covid19 not by random chance infection but by a deliberate smiting with a read, a biological weapon, a deliberate weaponised attack. For more on this see here.

So what Prof Montagnier saw with his virology expertise, I saw with my theological expertise. Showing that whilst fact checkers and science are mutually exclusive, science and theology actually agree, when properly understood (and that is one big caveat). Prof M taught us that the vaccines cause the variants. Indeed basic virology forbids mass vaccination during a pandemic for that very reason. He said the the curve of deaths follows the curve of vaccinations. Mind you, paradoxically, if the vaccines caused Omicron, then they may have saved us from themselves!

The Time has Come to hold People and Organisations to Account

The Covid19 makers, the genetic vaccine makers. their funders and their promoters, which include almost every government and public sector and health service in the world, are therefore guilty of Genocide and crimes against humanity. They have pushed genetic rape and sickness and death onto half of the population of the world in order to enrich the pockets of Pharmaceutical Companies. Governments and Public sectors around the world have abandoned their health service regulation to billionaires and heartless profit drunk corporations

In the UK, all of the income tax we pay goes to the health service and all of its protocols are determined by its regulators and all of its regulators are controlled and funded by Big Pharma who seek to damage then manage our health for their profit.

So every penny we spend in income tax brings us one step closer to sickness, to death and to drug dependency. 

So why did Prof Montagnier choose to spend the last years of his life proving that Covid-19 was man made and that the spike proteins, and therefore the vaccines, were an existential threat to the species? What did he have left to prove to himself or to anybody else at 87-89 having won the Nobel Prize for discovering the HIV virus?

He certainly did not do it to increase his reputation in the profession. No he was driven by the same passion that drove him to discover HIV. A passion to SAVE mankind from viruses and those who would engineer them to damage us. And why did he give up the ghost in February 2022? Because he knew that Omicron had the vaccines beat. His job was done by a greater virologist even than him. He could therefore rest in peace and go see some people who understood the magnitude of his contribution. 

Covid-19 was not made in 2019. It was made from the 19 nucleotide Moderna specific chimeric (CGG for AGA) furin cleavage site which does not occur anywhere in nature. 
And every Covid death and every Covid vaccine death is parked squarely on their doorstep waiting for justice.

But we shall not execute that justice fast enough and therefore the final plague upon mankind of Revelation 6:8, delivered by the 4th horseman of the apocalypse, which plague Bill Gates himself has prophesied, will arrive later this year (after War and after Famine, the 2nd and 3rd horsemen).

Wikipedia Disinformation

A certain professor from a UK Teaching Hospital wrote to me as follows

“You aught to read this from the Wikipedia article

Furin cleavage site
Some claims of bioengineering focus on the presence of two sequential cytosine-guanine-guanine (CGG) codons in the virus’ RNA, more precisely in the crucial furin cleavage site.[9][74] The CGG codon is one of several codons that translates into an arginine amino acid, and it is the least common arginine codon in human pathogenic betacoronaviruses.[105] Partially, this lack of CGG codons in human pathogenic coronaviruses is due to natural selection: B-cells in the human body recognize areas on virus genomes where C and G are next to each other (so-called CpG islands).[15][106] The CGG codon makes up 5% of the arginine codons in the SARS-CoV-1 genome, and it makes up 3% of the arginine codons in the SARS-CoV-2 genome.[9] 

Proponents of an engineered virus, including journalist Nicholas Wade, claim that two such uncommon codons in a row are evidence for a laboratory experiment; because of the low chance of a CGG codon pair occurring in nature, and in contrast, the common usage of CGG codons for arginine in genetic engineering work.[9][74] 

This has been disputed by scientists, who note that the CGG codon is also present (and even more frequent) in other coronaviruses, including MERS-CoV,[107] and that a codon being rare does not mean it cannot be present. In addition, the presence of the furin cleavage site, which is responsible for a significant increase in transmissibility, largely outweighs the disadvantageous immune responses from B-cells triggered by the genetic sequences which code for it.[106][15]

You are unlikely to gain support from people who are actually involved in genetic engineering and evolutionary studies like myself.

I will delete this thread and block your email after sending.

xxx – not easily taken in – xxxxx “

So I looked up the paper by the plurality of “scientists” as opposed to the singular “journalist” Nicholas Wade – reference 107. And wrote the following response and checked that his email server did accept my email…

Dear Prof XXX,

Thanks for your email. If you can prove my reasoning wrong I would be happy to write a correction in my next article. 

I read the one reference cited in Wikipedia for MERS-CoV having the CGG Codon and that paper states explicitly and emphatically…

“All human coronaviruses analyzed in this study did not use two synonymous codons (CGC, CGG) for arginine as well as CCG for proline and UGA for stop codon at all. ” – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487440/ 

My argument is very simple.

No virus in nature uses the CGG codon for Arginine in a furin cleavage site. I did check that in the blast database. I did the search. Nothing came up. 

Please therefore show me a naturally occurring virus (preferably one that appeared before Moderna appeared) with a furin cleavage site containing two CGG codons and you will defeat my argument.

I am afraid you were taken in XXX – not by me, but by Wikipedia !

Regards….

I got no response from the Professor. But strangely Wikipedia changed the reference number from 107 to 116 in the article above. Yet it still links to the same paper? So Wikipedia is falsely inferring that “scientists”, as opposed to one lone journalist, dispute that there is a low chance of double CGG occurring in nature, by noting that the CGG codon occurs in MERS citing a paper which explicitly declares that none of the human coronaviruses analysed within it used a double CGG codon, No true scientist can dispute the low chance of a sequence occurring in viruses by analysing viruses in which said sequence does not occur. Wikipedia is providing disinformation which just happens to protect the interests of pharmaceutical companies

But all of this is – dare I say it – academic. Because there are absolutely no viruses which have a CGG doublet in a Furin Cleavage site (PRRAR) except Covid-19 and except plant viruses which Dow Agroscience, Monsanto, or the like, have modified. And whether you are a journalist or a cell biologist or both (like myself) or neither, this article gives you the tools to check that FACT for yourself. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/virus/vssi/#/ Search for CCTCGGCGGGCACGT which codes for PRRAR.


Share this page to Telegram
4.4 7 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

77 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Marcelle
Marcelle
6 months ago

Brilliant research you are conducting. Thankyou!

winah99837
winah99837
Reply to  Marcelle
6 months ago

★彡 𝐈 𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐩𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 $𝟏𝟗𝟎 𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝟐 𝐤𝐢𝐝𝐬 𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞. 𝐈 𝐧𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐈’𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐨 𝐢𝐭 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐦𝐲 𝐛𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐟𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐬 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝟏𝟓𝐤 𝐚 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐡 𝐝𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐫𝐲. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬…, 彡★

Copy Here→→→→→ https://Www.Worksclick.Com

Last edited 6 months ago by winah99837
jennifer
jennifer
Reply to  winah99837
6 months ago

I make more then $12,000 a month online. It’s enough to comfortably replace my old jobs income, especially considering I only work about 11 to 12 hours a week from home. I was amazed how easy it was after I tried it…
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)

HERE====)> https://www.worksful.com

Last edited 6 months ago by jennifer
CatherineBorger
CatherineBorger
Reply to  jennifer
6 months ago

My last pay check was $8750 just ecom working 12 hours for every week. My neighbor have found the estimation of $15k for a long time and she works around 20 hours for seven days. I can not trust how direct it was once I tried it information.. 

Visit this website……… http://www.pays11.com

Last edited 6 months ago by CatherineBorger
LauraDicks
LauraDicks
Reply to  Marcelle
6 months ago

[ Work at Home ] I get paid more than $90 to $100 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site… 
Here is I started.…………>>  http://Www.NETCASH1.Com

Last edited 6 months ago by LauraDicks
Milton Farrow
Milton Farrow
Reply to  Marcelle
5 months ago

I am blown away at what i have just learned i do no have megabucks
but will send some money son your invaluable expose can continue
thank you for what you have done

yacak40202iu
yacak40202iu
6 months ago

I am making a good salary from home $7580-$9065/week , which is amazing, under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions,Definitely a try….===))> https://www.salarybaar.com/

Last edited 6 months ago by yacak40202iu
trackback
6 months ago

[…] March 17, 2022Exhaustive proof Moderna made Covid-19 […]

CatherineBrundage
CatherineBrundage

[BECOME A MEMBER] I make over $200-$300 an hour for online work. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining I easily made $30k with no online jobs knowledge. Just try it out on the attached page.

More details……. http://Www.WorkStar24.com

Last edited 6 months ago by CatherineBrundage
Dog Sheep
Dog Sheep
6 months ago

Great work. Thank you.

Rob
Rob
6 months ago

Great stuff. You may want to check out Gettr and Dr Zev Zelenko’s posts two days ago. He posted some details about RS Baric (mentioned above and a signatory to the Material Transfer Agreement Moderna signed with University of N Carolina at Chapel Hill, as you reported) There are parents that appear to be related to this but also a patent for a cure?!

Last edited 6 months ago by Rob
a christie
a christie
6 months ago

Yawn. More picking over your own corpse.

Sam
Sam
6 months ago

I wish this concerned reader would learn the difference between in-silico sequences and whole virus particles. The whole SARS-CoV2 virion has never been properly purified or proven to exist in its entirety. Sequences do not make an entire virus. The sequences entered into databases may be naturally occuring or they may be man made.

Richard Noakes
Richard Noakes
6 months ago

So how come Moderna can commit Crimes Against Humanity – proven – and they are not charged or punished for doing so, or the murder of millions so far and probably human civilization, which ends in this generation, because the vaccines change the human DNA in 6 hours and sterilizes everyone who has them in 8 hours – no more kids ever?
Don’t any of us count – we are just vermin to be exterminatated – is that how these things work?
Add insult to injury, Moderna recently awarded their top 4 execs who earn in the region of 1 million dollars each per year, bonuses and stock options in the BILLIONS for their success in advancing Modern’s cause.

trackback
6 months ago

[…] March 17, 2022Exhaustive proof Moderna made Covid-19 […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] Beyond my ken: […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] 10.  !! Exhaustive proof Moderna made Covid-19 […]

Bacon
Bacon

Was another version of COVID-19 made using WIV1-CoV spike?

Bacon
Bacon
Reply to  Bacon
6 months ago

Actually, sars-cov-2

Bacon
Bacon
6 months ago

What if any is the difference between RaTG13 and WIV1-CoV synthetic?

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Bacon
6 months ago

The article provides the difference onyl between RaTG13 and the original SARS CoV 2, which is Wuhan HU1 or Wuhan alpha. I have not looked at the subseuqent incarnations. But I understand that they all have the double CGG codon PRRAR insert.

Bacon
Bacon
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
6 months ago

Here is the reason why it should be, and it’s a big reason.

WIV1-CoV synthetic can from Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology! Work was completed by 2015 and patents followed. Look at where the experiment took place, UNC Lab. Baric and Shi were working together!

To create SARS-CoV-2

The following represents only a small part of the proof.

Lab-Made? SARS-CoV-2 Genealogy Through the Lens of Gain-of-Function Research
By Yuri Deigin
Apr 22, 2020

Using the SARS-CoV infectious clone as a template (7), we designed and synthesized a full-length infectious clone of WIV1-CoV consisting of six plasmids that could be enzymatically cut, ligated together, and electroporated into cells to rescue replication competent progeny virions (Fig. S1A). In addition to the full-length clone, we also produced WIV1-CoV chimeric virus that replaced the SARS spike with the WIV1 spike within the mouse-adapted backbone (WIV1-MA15, Fig. S1B). … To confirm growth kinetics and replication, Vero cells were infected with SARS-CoV Urbani, WIV1-MA15, and WIV1-CoV.[6]

comment image

To me, the 2016 paper looks a lot like the 2015 one. Moreover, its rationale is not very clear to me: after all, WIV1/Rs3367 already shared 96% of their genome with SARS-CoV. So I am not sure why one would want to insert a spike protein from its closest relative back into SARS-CoV. Maybe just because they could. In this light, the title of the article acquires a certain duality: SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence.

Oh, and I am not sure how in 2015 Baric was granted a patent for the creation of “chimeric coronavirus spike proteins”, given all that he and Shi Zhengli previously disclosed in their papers long before 2015.

httpsColon//yurideigin.medium.com/lab-made-cov2-genealogy-through-the-lens-of-gain-of-function-research-f96dd7413748

I believe the patent referenced above and granted to Baric is httpsColon//patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/84/9b/ba/459d77fa1380a5/WO2015143335A1.pdf
Publication of WO2015143335A1 US9884895B2

Change of events
Application PCT/US2015/021773
2014-03-20 Priority to US201461968279P
2014-03-20 Priority to US61/968,279
2015-03-20 Application filed by The University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill<————————–<<<<
2015-09-24 Publication of WO2015143335A1

SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence[3]

Synthetic construction of chimeric mutant and full-length WIV1-CoV were approved by the UNC Institutional Biosafety Committee and the Dual Use Research of Concern Committee.[4]

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. We thank Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology for access to bat CoV sequences and plasmid of WIV1-CoV spike protein. Research was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease and the National Institute of Aging of the NIH under Awards U19AI109761 and U19AI107810 (to R.S.B.), AI1085524 (to W.A.M.), and F32AI102561 and K99AG049092 (to V.D.M.). Human airway epithelial cell cultures were supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Di-gestive and Kidney Disease under Award NIH DK065988 (to S.H.R.). Support for the generation of the mice expressing human ACE2 was provided by NIH Grants AI076159 and AI079521 (to A.C.S.) [3].

Bacon
Bacon
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
6 months ago

I believe more than one version of COVID-19 was created. This happens to be a bioweapon version that China and America created together.

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Bacon
6 months ago

This is good stuff. Please write up an article and submit it to the Expose with my recommendation. We need to get all the evidence together and then possibly a law suit because Moderna is NOT protected against suits to do with Covid-19. It is only protected against suits to do with the vaccines. It will need some serious security for costs. But it will enable us to get disclosure!.

Last edited 6 months ago by Lords Witnesses
Bacon
Bacon
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
6 months ago

The last few patents on COVID-19 were reportedly completed in Wuhan with the lasted in 2019. So it should be possible to see which version showed up in the patents, against which version was released or escaped? I think, this would be very revealing.

Let’s just get the bottom of this mystery. Look at all the patents filed in Wuhan and work backward.

DR Martin – https://drive.google.com/file/d/19o1BeQa6z9XD58GkYE1e-qiiNbnr5wTz/view

if you actually take what they report to be novel, you find 73 patents issued between 2008 and 2019 which have the elements that were allegedly novel in the SARS COV-2, specifically as it relates to the polybasic cleavage site, the ACE-2 receptor binding domain, and the spike protein. So the clinically novel components of the clinically unique, clinically contagious, you know where I’m going with this, okay…

There was no outbreak of SARS, because we had engineered all of the elements of that, and by 2016, the paper that was funded during the gain-of-function moratorium, that said that the SARS coronavirus was poised for human emergence, written by none other than Ralph Barrack, was not only poised for human emergence, but it was patented for commercial exploitation, 73 times.

Zyc
Zyc
Reply to  Bacon
6 months ago

Last edited 6 months ago by Zyc
Zyc
Zyc
Reply to  Bacon
6 months ago

so you mean China want created virus that attack own people first to attack whole world?is it reasonable?

Bacon
Bacon
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
6 months ago

I hope the following will be of some help in your efforts to understand the truth, Lords Witnesses.

You are the experts!

Last edited 6 months ago by Bacon
aas
aas
6 months ago

1

Bacon
Bacon
6 months ago

Part 1

I am about to tell you a story. I am not the author of this story, which is all about the bioweapon COVID-19.

It all started for me with a video from DR Martin that was later transcribed for the listeners.

DR Martin – https://drive.google.com/file/d/19o1BeQa6z9XD58GkYE1e-qiiNbnr5wTz/view
if you actually take what they report to be novel, you find 73 patents issued between 2008 and 2019 which have the elements that were allegedly novel in the SARS COV-2, specifically as it relates to the polybasic cleavage site, the ACE-2 receptor binding domain, and the spike protein. So the clinically novel components of the clinically unique, clinically contagious, you know where I’m going with this, okay…
There was no outbreak of SARS, because we had engineered all of the elements of that, and by 2016, the paper that was funded during the gain-of-function moratorium, that said that the SARS coronavirus was poised for human emergence, written by none other than Ralph Barrack, was not only poised for human emergence, but it was patented for commercial exploitation, 73 times.

Bacon
Bacon
6 months ago

Part 2

In 2008, DARPA started funding this bioweapon construction. And, for this, I will refer the reader to DR Martin’s 21 pages at https://drive.google.com/file/d/19o1BeQa6z9XD58GkYE1e-qiiNbnr5wTz/view

At the time I started down this path, I did not realize that there were earlier versions of SARS-CoV-2. This is all about the bioweapon made with WIV1 from CHina.

THE 3Ws of COVID-19(SARS-CoV-2)

Who: Ralph S. Baric, PhD(UNC-Chapel Hill Lab)[1], Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi(Wuhan China)[2]
When: 2015-03-20
Where: UNC-Chapel Hill
comment image

 I believe in 2015, through the joint efforts of American(NCU) and Chinese(Wuhan) labs and Baric and Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi. COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) was made using WIV1-CoV chimeric.

In addition to the full-length clone, we also produced WIV1-CoV chimeric virus that replaced the SARS spike with the WIV1 spike within the mouse-adapted backbone.
·
Lab-Made? SARS-CoV-2 Genealogy Through the Lens of Gain-of-Function Research
By Yuri Deigin
Apr 22, 2020

Using the SARS-CoV infectious clone as a template (7), we designed and synthesized a full-length infectious clone of WIV1-CoV consisting of six plasmids that could be enzymatically cut, ligated together, and electroporated into cells to rescue replication competent progeny virions (Fig. S1A). In addition to the full-length clone, we also produced WIV1-CoV chimeric virus that replaced the SARS spike with the WIV1 spike within the mouse-adapted backbone (WIV1-MA15, Fig. S1B). … To confirm growth kinetics and replication, Vero cells were infected with SARS-CoV Urbani, WIV1-MA15, and WIV1-CoV.[6]
comment image

Bacon
Bacon
6 months ago

Part 3

comment image

To me, the 2016 paper looks a lot like the 2015 one. Moreover, its rationale is not very clear to me: after all, WIV1/Rs3367 already shared 96% of their genome with SARS-CoV. So I am not sure why one would want to insert a spike protein from its closest relative back into SARS-CoV. Maybe just because they could. In this light, the title of the article acquires a certain duality: SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence.

“Oh, and I am not sure how in 2015 Baric was granted a patent for the creation of “chimeric coronavirus spike proteins”, given all that he and Shi Zhengli previously disclosed in their papers long before 2015.”

https://yurideigin.medium.com/lab-made-cov2-genealogy-through-the-lens-of-gain-of-function-research-f96dd7413748

I believe the patent referenced above and granted to Baric is https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/84/9b/ba/459d77fa1380a5/WO2015143335A1.pdf
Publication of WO2015143335A1

Bacon
Bacon
6 months ago

Part 4

Change of events
Application PCT/US2015/021773
2014-03-20  Priority to US201461968279P
2014-03-20  Priority to US61/968,279
2015-03-20  Application filed by The University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill<————————–<<<<
2015-09-24  Publication of WO2015143335A1

SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence[3]

Synthetic construction of chimeric mutant and full-length WIV1-CoV were approved by the UNC Institutional Biosafety Committee and the Dual Use Research of Concern Committee.[4]

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. We thank Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology for access to bat CoV sequences and plasmid of WIV1-CoV spike protein. Research was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease and the National Institute of Aging of the NIH under Awards U19AI109761 and U19AI107810 (to R.S.B.), AI1085524 (to W.A.M.), and F32AI102561 and K99AG049092 (to V.D.M.). Human airway epithelial cell cultures were supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Di-gestive and Kidney Disease under Award NIH DK065988 (to S.H.R.). Support for the generation of the mice expressing human ACE2 was provided by NIH Grants AI076159 and AI079521 (to A.C.S.) [3].

A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence[4]

Construction of Chimeric SARS-Like Viruses. Both wild-type and chimeric WIV-CoV infectious clones were designed using published sequences and based on the SARS-CoV infectious clone (10). Synthetic construction of chimeric mutant and full-length WIV1-CoV were approved by the UNC Institutional Biosafety Committee and the Dual Use Research of Concern Committee.[3]

ONLINE METHODS:
Construction of SARS-like chimeric viruses. Both wild-type and chimeric viruses were derived from either SARS-CoV Urbani or the correspond-ing mouse-adapted (SARS-CoV MA15) infectious clone (ic) as previously described27. Plasmids containing spike sequences for SHC014 were extracted by restriction digest and ligated into the E and F plasmid of the MA15 infec-tious clone. The clone was designed and purchased from Bio Basic as six contiguous cDNAs using published sequences flanked by unique class II restriction endonuclease sites (BglI). Thereafter, plasmids containing wild-type, chimeric SARS-CoV and SHC014-CoV genome fragments were ampli-fied, excised, ligated and purified. In vitro transcription reactions were then preformed to synthesize full-length genomic RNA, which was transfected into Vero E6 cells as previously described2. The medium from transfected cells was harvested and served as seed stocks for subsequent experiments. Chimeric and full-length viruses were confirmed by sequence analysis before use in these studies. Synthetic construction of chimeric mutant and full-length SHC014-CoV was approved by the University of North Carolina Institutional Biosafety Committee and the Dual Use Research of Concern committee. [4]

Bacon
Bacon
6 months ago

Part 5

The virus is known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The disease it causes is called coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)..[5]

Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in over 150 million people (Organization 2020).[5]

References for everything-thing, the true authors
1 https*//sph.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/112/2021/10/Ralph_Baric_2021_Jon_Gardiner_738x714-738×714.jpg
2 https*//www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/shi-zhengli-2–360×188.jpg
3 https*//www.pnas.org/content/pnas/113/11/3048.full.pdf
4 https*//www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985.pdf
5 https*//www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/symptoms-causes/syc-20479963
5 https*//link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11481-021-10012-9
6 https*/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4801244/

Bacon
Bacon
6 months ago

Understand that the following articles are on the same experiment

SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence
Vineet D. Menachery a, Boyd L. Yount Jr. a , Amy C. Simsa , Kari Debbinka,b , Sudhakar S. Agnihothram c , Lisa E. Gralinski a ,Rachel L. Grahama , Trevor Scobey a, Jessica A. Plantea , Scott R. Royal a , Jesica Swanstrom a , Timothy P. Sheahan a, Raymond J. Picklesc,d , Davide Cortie,f,g , Scott H. Randell d, Antonio Lanzavecchia e,f , Wayne A. Marasco h,and Ralph S. Baric a,c,

https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1517719113

A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence
Vineet D Menachery1, Boyd L Yount Jr1, Kari Debbink1,2, Sudhakar Agnihothram3, Lisa E Gralinski1,Jessica A Plante1, Rachel L Graham1, Trevor Scobey1, Xing-Yi Ge4, Eric F Donaldson1, Scott H Randell5,6,
Antonio Lanzavecchia7, Wayne A Marasco8,9, Zhengli-Li Shi4 & Ralph S Baric1,2

https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985.pdf

Bacon
Bacon
6 months ago

It’s about 1 hour to read through his research

Lab-Made? SARS-CoV-2 Genealogy Through the Lens of Gain-of-Function Research
Apr 22, 2020
By Yuri Deigin

“Oh, and I am not sure how in 2015 Baric was granted a patent for the creation of “chimeric coronavirus spike proteins”, given all that he and Shi Zhengli previously disclosed in their papers long before 2015”.

https://yurideigin.medium.com/lab-made-cov2-genealogy-through-the-lens-of-gain-of-function-research-f96dd7413748

Bacon
Bacon
6 months ago
Bacon
Bacon
6 months ago

Yes folks, I believe that it will. And, that 2027 is going to be big.

But we shall not execute that justice fast enough and therefore the final plague upon mankind of Revelation 6:8, delivered by the 4th horseman of the apocalypse, which plague Bill Gates himself has prophesied, will arrive later this year (after War and after Famine, the 2nd and 3rd horsemen).

Bacon
Bacon
6 months ago

What good is a virus without a vaccine.
  (a key without a lock)

Starting with the realization that Moderna required time, money and effort to develop the COVID-19 virus and the mRNA vaccine based on someone else’s patents in part, 6 years before COVID-19 was released. So how do we know, Moderna used its own patented technology to create the virus and the vaccine. By asking this simple question – what good is a virus without a vaccine. One of the two critical LIPIDS patent applications for the Moderna vaccine was filed on 2014-08-18, and the other on 2009-04-15. As you will see, these patents belong to Arbutus Biopharma Corporation ( Protiva Biotherapeutics Inc).

Now let’s stop and look on the five patent dates below for the Furin Cleavage Sequence, which also appears in Covid-19, and which was found actually in the reverse compliment form CTACGTGCCCGCCGAGGAG all patented by Moderna listed below.

The following two sets of patents for the mRNA Vaccine were made and planned. Long before COVID-19 was released. So how would I know the vaccine and virus are more than coincidentally connected. First by realizing COVID-19 was made in a lab using “Furin Cleavage Sequence” patented by Moderna. Second, by understanding that Moderna COVID-19 ‘had to have’ the LIPIDS patented by a company called Protiva Biotherapeutics, Inc. So much so, that they were willing to use their product the LIPIDS in the vaccine without Arbutus approval. Apparently, it was critical for Moderna to meet it’s timing.

2008-04-15 Priority to US4522808P
2014-08-18 Application filed by Protiva Biotherapeutics Inc
2015-06-18 Publication of US20150164799A1
2016-06-14 Application granted
2016-06-14 Publication of US9364435B2
2018-03-05 First worldwide family litigation filed [1]

Arbutus’ U.S. Patent No. 8,058,069 (IPR2019-00554 filed January 9, 2019: no challenged claims found unpatentable),

2008-04-15 Priority to US4522808P
2009-04-15 Application filed by Protiva Biotherapeutics Inc
2010-05-27 Publication of US20100130588A1
2011-11-15 Publication of US8058069B2
2011-11-15 Application granted
2018-03-05 First worldwide family litigation filed[2]
*************************

US9149506B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding septin-4 –[3]

Inventor: Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles
Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc

2012-04-02 Priority to US201261618953P
2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc
2014-05-22 Publication of US20140141067A1
2015-10-06 Publication of US9149506B2
2015-10-06 Application granted
2020-01-10 First worldwide family litigation filed

US9216205B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding granulysin –[4]

Inventor: Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles
Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc

2012-04-02 Priority to US201261618873P
2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc
2014-04-24 Publication of US20140113960A1
2015-12-22 Publication of US9216205B2
2015-12-22 Application granted

US9255129B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding SIAH E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 – [5]

Inventor: Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles
Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc

2012-04-02 Priority to US201261618868P
2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc
2014-05-22 Publication of US20140141068A1
2016-02-09 Application granted
2016-02-09 Publication of US9255129B2

US9301993B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding apoptosis inducing factor 1 –[6]

Inventor: Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles
Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc

2012-04-02 Priority to US201261618957P
2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc
2014-04-17 Publication of US20140107189A1
2016-04-05 Application granted
2016-04-05 Publication of US9301993B2
2020-01-10 First worldwide family litigation filed

US9587003B2: Modified polynucleotides for the production of oncology-related proteins and peptides –[5]

Inventor: Stephane Bancel, Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles, Sayda M. Elbashir, Matthias John, Atanu Roy, Susan Whoriskey, Kristy M. Wood, Paul Hatala, Jason P. Schrum, Kenechi Ejebe, Jeff Lynn Ellsworth, Justin Guild

Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc

2012-04-02 Priority to US201261618868P
2016-02-04 Application filed by ModernaTx Inc
2016-06-02 Publication of US20160152678A1
2017-03-07 Publication of US9587003B2
2017-03-07 Application granted[7]

1 https[Colon]//patents.google.com/patent/US9364435B2/en
2 https[Colon]://www.ipwatchdog.com/2021/04/11/mrna-ip-competitive-landscape-one-year-covid-19-pandemic-part/id=132130/
2 https[Colon]//patents.google.com/patent/US8058069B2/en
3 https://patents.google.com/patent/US9149506B2/en
4 https[Colon]://patents.google.com/patent/US9216205B2/en
5 https[Colon]//patents.google.com/patent/US9255129B2/en
6 https[Colon]//patents.google.com/patent/US9301993B2/en
7 https[Colon]//patents.google.com/patent/US9587003B2/en
8 https[Colon]//dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/14/documents-published-confirming-moderna-created-covid/

trackback
6 months ago

[…] (Natural News) The origin of the virus that causes COVID-19 has been the subject of lively debate, with the general consensus now being that it was created in a lab rather than by nature. And when it comes to who could be responsible for this deadly virus, Moderna is looking increasingly guilty. […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] (Natural News) The origin of the virus that causes COVID-19 has been the subject of lively debate, with the general consensus now being that it was created in a lab rather than by nature. And when it comes to who could be responsible for this deadly virus, Moderna is looking increasingly guilty. […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] (Natural News) The origin of the virus that causes COVID-19 has been the subject of lively debate, with the general consensus now being that it was created in a lab rather than by nature. And when it comes to who could be responsible for this deadly virus, Moderna is looking increasingly guilty. […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] (Natural News) The origin of the virus that causes COVID-19 has been the subject of lively debate, with the general consensus now being that it was created in a lab rather than by nature. And when it comes to who could be responsible for this deadly virus, Moderna is looking increasingly guilty. […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] The origin of the virus that causes COVID-19 has been the subject of lively debate, with the general consensus now being that it was created in a lab rather than by nature. And when it comes to who could be responsible for this deadly virus, Moderna is looking increasingly guilty. […]

Bacon
Bacon
6 months ago

New Information –

Look at the first date, when they started working together. November 6, 2015. What was just finished in 2015. SARS-CoV-2 – See Above

Moderna and NIAID have joint ownership of COVID-19 vaccine

“Jointly-owned by NIAID and Moderna” p. 105

August 10, 2018

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6935295/NIH-Moderna-Confidential-Agreements.pdf

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6935295-NIH-Moderna-Confidential-Agreements.html#doSARS-CoV-2cument/p105/a568569

Asdf
Asdf
6 months ago

This is a joke, right?

trackback
6 months ago

[…] is the subsequent story in The Expose which goes into more detail about this. The key part is […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] más detalles científicos sobre el tema en cuestión. Puedes leer la Primera Parte aquí, y la Segunda Parte aquí. La segunda parte contiene el método completo de usar la base de datos BLAST para que pueda […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] sull’argomento in questione. Puoi leggere la prima parte qui e la seconda parte qui. La seconda parte contiene il metodo completo di utilizzo del database BLAST per consentirti di […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] hier gefundenen Informationen deuten zudem darauf hin, dass Moderna an der Entwicklung des […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] found here points to Moderna having a hand in creating the Covid-19 […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] ktoré sa tu nachádzajú, poukazujú na to, že Moderna sa podieľala na vytváraní vírusu […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] found here points to Moderna having a hand in creating the Covid-19 […]

Douglas Youvan
Douglas Youvan
5 months ago

This article is correct up until the section “Was it Moderna or Someone else?” Then it goes very bad. That leads me to believe all the good work on the sequence was sabotaged by the editor into something that reads like it was written by conspiracy theorists, thus discrediting the solid work on the Moderna Furin cleavage site being engineered into a bat virus to make COVID-19. I wonder who got to them? BTW, we already knew about the Moderna sequence (21 February 2022). This is solid data:  https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fviro.2022.834808/full?fbclid=IwAR09a367FRZepDzaZdcE9VSPm7HVe4qa7OWHIjGP4PjL-AWlrCGIcdXkXWw Blame still goes to Wuhan which indicates who influenced the editing of this article.

Douglas Youvan
Douglas Youvan
5 months ago
trackback
5 months ago

[…] Actually the double CGG codon Furin Cleavage site does not exist in ANY virus in nature. And this proposal nails Peter Daszak/ECO Health Allinace at the creator of SARS CoV 2 and Covid-19. which differs from the Bat Coronavirus RaTG13 only by the insertion of double CGG Codon Furin cleavage site and by other smaller deviations all of which are 3 or less base pairs (1 codon) long – https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/17/exhaustive-proof-moderna-made-covid-19/   […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] Actually the double CGG codon Furin Cleavage site does not exist in ANY virus in nature. And this proposal nails Peter Daszak/ECO Health Allinace at the creator of SARS CoV 2 and Covid-19. which differs from the Bat Coronavirus RaTG13 only by the insertion of double CGG Codon Furin cleavage site and by other smaller deviations all of which are 3 or less base pairs (1 codon) long – https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/17/exhaustive-proof-moderna-made-covid-19/   […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] 17. Mars 2022 The Expose:  Exhaustive proof Moderna made Covid-19 […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] found here points to Moderna having a hand in creating the Covid-19 […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] found here points to Moderna having a hand in creating the Covid-19 […]