Breaking News

BBC’s “Vaccine Is Safe” For Pregnant Women “Expert” Just Happens to Also Be Principal Investigator of Pfizer’s Covid Injection in Pregnancy Trial

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Professor Norman Fenton has been reporting on the bias of the BBC documentary ‘Unvaccinated’ which is being screened today, 20 July.  It’s an attempt to convince those who have chosen not to have a Covid injection to “get jabbed.”  It is a timely, eye-opening investigation commissioned by BBC Factual, the BBC claims without explaining why it is “timely” – presumably, they are hoping we believe, due most likely to the fraudulent use of PCR tests, “Covid-19 is on the rise again.”

A search on both the internet and BBC’s website for “BBC Factual” returned no results which makes one wonder who actually commissioned BBC’s “investigation.”  If any of our readers have any information about “BBC Factual” we would be grateful you noting it in the comments section under this article.

In this documentary, Prof. Fenton wrote, “mathematician Prof Hannah Fry – with the help of ‘experts’ –  attempts to convince 7 members of the public (who have so far refused) to take the Covid vaccine. As I pointed out the BBC (in the publicity for the programme) already signposted the likely extreme bias in the programme by massive underestimating the number of unvaccinated people in the UK, hence trying to present such people as a tiny extreme fringe.”

Read more: Professor Norman Fenton: BBC Claims 8% of the UK Population Is Unvaccinated – It Is a Lie


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here


Another so-called “expert” BBC used to help convince the unvaccinated – those who follow good science and are part of almost 30% of the UK population who have chosen to remain unvaccinated – is Asma Khalil.

The more we dig the worse it gets, Prof. Fenton wrote in a tweet. Here’s Asma Khalil, the “expert” they used to declare the “vaccine” safe for pregnant women:

And as long ago as 2015 Asma Khalil declared these conflicts of interest as a member of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (“NICE”) Quality Standards Committee.

Responding to Prof. Fenton’s tweet, Andy Sands neatly portrays BBC’s propaganda documentary:

More on BBC’s “Expert” Asma Khalil

We now know that Khalil is the principal investigator (“PI”) of the Pfizer Covid “vaccination” in pregnancy trial.  We also know from a response to a Freedom of Information request alongside an in-depth dive into the only pregnancy/fertility study performed that Medicine Regulators and Pfizer chose to publicly cover up alarming abnormalities of the developing foetus and falsely downgraded the actual risk of Covid “vaccination” during pregnancy by suppressing documented findings of the clinical data.

Read more: FOIA reveals Pfizer & Medicine Regulators hid dangers of COVID Vaccination during Pregnancy after Study found it increases risk of Birth Defects & Infertility and The Facts About Pfizer mRNA Vaccine Risks to Unborn Babies

So, is there anything else about Khalil that should set alarm bells ringing?  Yes.  There is more on Khalil in Professor Fenton’s article titled ‘BBC’s ‘independent vaccine expert’ just happens to be in charge of Pfizer’s Vaccine Centre’:

It turns out that she was a participant in the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation-funded simulation ‘Preparing for Disease X: Ensuring Vaccine Equity for Pregnant Women in Future Pandemics’ – the results of which are reported in THIS paper that she co-authored and was funded by:

Note that there is no declaration by Asma Khalil (“AK”). This requires an explanation. Nor does AK declare any conflict of interests (“COIs”) in her other recent publications.

So, What Do the So-Called “Anti-Vaxxers” Actually Think?

Unlike the BBC biased nonsense, Daily Sceptic published an article in May which described a rigorous study into the views of the unvaccinated. Rather than just listen to the lazy stereotypes of sceptics portrayed in the press, academia and Government, the authors of the study – Dr. Raminder Mulla, Amy Willows and Rusere Shoniwa – decided they would go and find out what people actually thought.

A January 2021 study by Miguel et al concluded that people who shunned compliance with Covid containment measures were more likely to display “lower levels of empathy and higher levels of callousness, deceitfulness, and risk-taking”.

Prompted by a desire to foster genuine understanding between different sides of the Covid camp, a new study led by Dr. Raminder Mulla dug into this question. The study titled ‘Looking into their eyes’ found, unsurprisingly, that this vilified group are anything but baby killers or terrorists. Crucially, they did not evince the stereotypical tropes about ‘anti-vaxxers’ that have been propagated in corporate and social media.

Simply put, the participants believe that lockdowns were a state overreach. They oppose lockdowns because of the burden placed on the entire population irrespective of risk, the collateral damage caused, and the imposition on civil liberties and individual freedom.

Addressing the label “anti-vax” directly, the study finds that most of its participants were not opposed to vaccination in principle but did express doubts about the rapid development and deployment of the current Covid vaccines and their side effects. None of the study participants subscribed to unusual theories, referencing 5G or nanobots, with which this group is often stereotyped.

Delving into the participants’ values, the study finds that most emphasised personal responsibility and autonomy in health and other affairs and the importance of the maxim to ‘do unto others as you would have them do unto you.’

Despite the disappointment, some interviewees expressed with those who unquestioningly complied with the Covid narrative, they did not wish them harm or inconvenience. In contrast, other studies have shown that this attitude of non-malevolence is not reciprocated by the compliant towards the non-compliant, whom the compliant view as deserving of unemployment, impoverishment and censorship.

Looking into their Eyes: Covid Narrative Dissidents in Their Own Words, Daily Sceptic, 3 May 2022
Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News

Tagged as:

4 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
17 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stephen
Stephen
18 days ago

The bbc exists purely to support government policy dictat…and they are past masters at it. What can be done about it? Not a lot. Unsubscribe? Yes, but after all the BS about defunding the bbc, the government is looking at funding its propaganda wing through local council tax…so everyone pays! Nothing will change until the sleeping masses wake up to what’s going on.

Thales of Miletus
Thales of Miletus
18 days ago

A more meaningful debate would be where pro vaccine and anti vaccine scientists debate the issue. The pro lobby have constantly refused to debate with their peers.

PAUL GERROD WALTER MENDHAM
PAUL GERROD WALTER MENDHAM
Reply to  Thales of Miletus
17 days ago

This was ALL clearly set out & planned in the video: Event 201: Pandemic Simulation, on the internet around August/Sept 2019. In the reconstruction, that was put together by Bill & Melinda Gates foundation, John Hopkins university & the WEF (?? Alarm bells right there!) itself!! The video presentation was a chilling almost WORD for WORD, week by week, month by month simulation …..of EXACTLY what THEY intended to do……………………………………RIGHT down to newscasters explaining that the MSM would have to silence, demonise, delegitimise ANY & EVERY highly respected & vastly experienced & knowledgeable virologist, epidemiologist & immunologist expert, that DARED to have an opposing view on THEIR ‘agenda & narrative’….or WE (meaning THEM!) would not be able to implement our policies on lockdowns & mass v@xxination programs!!! That IS/WAS on camera….on the internet!! Around that time also, the genius inventor of the PCR, Kary Mullis……..conveniently DIED!! (He steadfastly stated that his PCR was definitely NOT designed AND was NOT able to detect LIVE disease tissue……………….and the cycle was only effective and accurate when run at 25 cycles…..NOT the 35/45 cycles that were being used to find the most MINUTE fragments of (sometimes LONG dead) disease tissue!!

Matthew
Matthew
18 days ago

I’m not ‘anti-vaccine’, I’m just anti *this* ‘vaccine’. Despite the WEF’s best efforts to kill, impoverish, and starve us, I will never get the ‘clot shot’.

Steve
Steve
18 days ago

I’m finding it a lot easier to speak to strangers about the vaccination topic. It just needs practice. However I’m surprised to hear that many will either not have the jab at all or have had 2 and refuse to boosted because of a bad experience. For the BBC to do this, they know that they are losing the jab battle. This 4th shot will be lethal in my opinion because people are dying too slowly.

Judy DePasquale
Judy DePasquale
Reply to  Steve
17 days ago

And I can’t believe they’re still pushing this illegitimate vaccine to inocent trusting people. Especially babies!!!! This is all B S!. From day 1. And it was all planned a few years back…..they won’t stop at nothing! We mustn’t stop at nothing to put the truth out there!!!! PLEASE DOCTORS STAND UP TOGETHER & TELL THE TRUTH! YOU KNOW BETTER! IF YOU ALL COME TOGETHER FOR OUR INOCENT PEOPLE BE STRONG AND YOU WILL BEAT THEM! THEY NEED YOU TO CONTINUE TO LIE! YOU CAN TAKE THEM DOWN BY TELLING THE TRUTH! WHAT ABOUT THE OATH YOU TOOK? BAN TOGETHER & HELP US, STOP THIS FRAUDULENT CORRUPTION ! PEOPLE ARE DYING, & GETTING SICK & THEY ARE DEPOPULATING RIGHT BEFOUR OUR EYES! STAND UP FOR THE PEOPLE STAND UP FOR YOUR INOCENT PATIENTS , SAVE LIFES!!!!!!! TELL THE TRUTH….OR YOU ALL WILL BURN IN HELL!👹

Paul Cottingham
Paul Cottingham
17 days ago
Steve
Steve
Reply to  Paul Cottingham
17 days ago

Watching this programme now, where are the anti-vax experts? What a load of propaganda!

moira richards
moira richards
Reply to  Steve
17 days ago

I started to watch it but then propaganda and the blatant lies that were told to these people was just too much for me and I had to switch off but I will find out tomorrow if anything was said about this on the UK column.

trackback
17 days ago

[…] BBC’s “Vaccine Is Safe” For Pregnant Women “Expert” Just Happens to Also Be Principal Inve… Professor Norman Fenton has been reporting on the bias of the BBC documentary ‘Unvaccinated’ which is being screened today, 20 July.  It’s an attempt to convince those who have chosen not to have a Covid injection to “get jabbed.”  It is a timely, eye-opening investigation commissioned by BBC Factual, the BBC claims without explaining why it is “timely” – presumably, they are hoping we believe, due most likely to the fraudulent use of PCR tests, “Covid-19 is on the rise again.” […]

Colin Edge
Colin Edge
17 days ago

This documentary was sickening to watch. No mention of the useless PCR. No mention of ABSOLUTE v RELATIVE effectiveness of vaccines. No mention of death and injury causation – under the Bradford Hill postulates. Demonstration of the jelly bean charade was unbelievable. Vaccinate the world and they’d have tons of the stuff.

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
16 days ago

BBC is a corrupted institution period.
Not watched it since Brexit referendum

trackback
16 days ago

[…] Read More: BBC’s “Vaccine Is Safe” For Pregnant Women “Expert” Just Happens to Also Be Pri… […]

Lancer
Lancer
16 days ago

Granted much of what was “discussed” in ‘Unvaccinated’ was skewed to the ‘nth degree and was a classic hatchet job we’ve all come to expect from the BBC but it was interesting in what they didn’t talk about. Where was ‘herd immunity’ – more accurately their lauded vaccine-induced herd immunity? Of course we know why it wasn’t included since this “vaccine” doesn’t serve as an inoculation, people still get infected so are never going to contribute to herd immunity, even by modern vaccine logic. Where was the frequently touted 95% efficacy? Gone! All they had was some anecdotal evidence of 20 patients ending up in ICU and 19 of them being supposedly unvaccinated. What a load of utter horse manure!

Much of it was frustrating but most disturbing I thought was their manipulation on camera at the end to try and get them jabbed there and then. Literal drug pushing!!! Thankfully no one submitted but this program was nothing more than an attempt to further the divide – really quite sickening when you think about it in that context.

trackback
2 days ago

[…] BBC’s “Vaccine Is Safe” For Pregnant Women “Expert” Just Happens to Also Be Principal Inve… […]