Cancer begins when genetic changes interfere with the normal replication and replacement of cells in the body. Cells start to grow uncontrollably and may form a tumour. It is the No. 2 leading cause of death in the United States.
Unfortunately, it appears the disease may be on the rise thanks to the experimental Covid-19 injections. Because official U.S. Government data confirms the risk of developing cancer following Covid-19 vaccination increases by a shocking 143,233%.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) hosts a Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) which contains historical data on adverse reactions reported against every vaccine that has been administered in the United States of America.
A quick search of the CDC VAERS database on the number of cancer cases reported as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections since they were first rolled out in the USA, reveals that from December 2020 up to 5th August 2022, a total of 2,579 adverse events related to cancer were made in just 1 year and 8 months.

Source
But performing a similar search of the VAERS database on the number of cancer cases reported as adverse events to all other available vaccines between 2008 and 2020, a period of 13 years, reveals there were just 791 adverse events related to cancer.

Source
Many would simply argue without backing their claim up with any evidence, that this is just because of the volume of Covid-19 injections administered compared to all other vaccines. But unfortunately, anyone who argues this is wrong.
We can see this by looking at the number of doses administered.
The following chart shows the total number of flu vaccine doses administered in 13 full flu seasons all the way from the 2008/2009 flu season to the 2019-2020 flu season. The data has been extracted from the CDC info found here.
In all between the 08/09 flu season and the 19/20 flu season, there were a total of 1,720,400,000 (1.7204 billion) doses of the flu jab administered in the USA.
The CDC also confirms that between 2008 and 2020, a period of 13 years, there were just 64 events related to cancer reported as adverse reactions to the influenza vaccines.

Source
Based on the number of adverse events related to cancer alone, we can see that there have been 40.3x as many cancer cases related to Covid-19 vaccination than there have been related to flu vaccination.

But whilst shocking, this statistic doesn’t properly represent the severity of the situation. To do that we need to know the number of cancer cases per 100,000 doses administered.
Based on the above numbers provided by the CDC, the number of adverse events related to cancer reported per 100,000 doses of flu vaccine administered equates to just 0.0003 per 100,000 doses.
According to ‘Our World in Data’, as of 9th August 2022, 606 million doses of the Covid-19 vaccines have been administered in the USA. This means there have been actually nearly 3x as many flu vaccines administered between 2008-2020 than Covid-19 injections since the end of 2020, let alone all of the other vaccines that have been administered.

Therefore, the number of adverse events related to cancer reported per 100,000 doses of Covid-19 vaccine administered equates to 0.43 per 100,000 doses.

This means Covid-19 vaccination is 1433.33x / 143,233.33% more likely to cause cancer than flu vaccination. It can be argued that because the numbers are so extraordinarily low for the flu vaccine, that flu vaccination does not cause cancer. Therefore, it can be argued that the risk of developing cancer following Covid-19 vaccination is 1433x greater than the background risk.
This should however not come as much of a surprise considering we already have scientific proof that the Covid-19 mRNA injections can cause cancer of the ovaries, pancreas and breast.
The homologous recombination DNA repair pathway is one of the mechanisms that the body uses to stop your cells from turning cancerous in response to environmental stress.
And in October 2021, two revered scientists, called Jiang and Mei, had a paper published, after peer review, in MDPI, showing that the SARS-Cov-2 spike protein obliterated the DNA repair mechanism in lymphocytes.
The viral spike protein was so toxic to this pathway that it knocked 90% of it out. If the whole spike protein got into the nucleus (in the ovaries), and enough of it was produced and hung around long enough before the body was able to get rid of it all, it would cause cancer.
Fortunately, in the case of naturl infection, this is unlikely to occur. But the experimental mRNA “vaccines” induce spike protein to be produced in and around the cell nucleus and this occurs for at least 60 days and almost certainly longer.
This is probably why cases of ovarian cancer are now at an all-time high.
Official UK data published by Public Health Scotland, which can be found here, reveal the number of women suffering ovarian cancer from the introduction of the Covid-19 injection to the general population. Unfortunately, the known trend in 2021 was significantly higher than 2020 and the 2017-2019 average.

Ovarian Cancer – Source
The above chart shows up to June 2021, but the charts found on Public Health Scotland’s dashboard now show figures all the way up to December 2021 and unfortunately reveal that the gap has widened even further with the number of women suffering from Ovarian cancer increasing significantly.
If you still wish to get a jab that doesn’t stop you from getting Covid-19, doesn’t stop you from spreading Covid-19, increases your risk of mortality significantly (see here), and increases your risk of suffering cancer by 143,233% then that’s up to you. But perhaps you can now be a little more understanding of why many others simply refuse to do so.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help..
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
.
Can you please help power The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful journalism for the years to come…
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
such as Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal
are trying to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?, The Expose Blog, World News
Whoever would have thought the medical profession would be so easily corrupted
That’s me
And they trusted the governments. Fools.
I wonder what proportion of vaxers would say, “143,233 percent increase? Is that all???”
Yeah, another bullshit article from the Republican scum…thank you for nothing!
Independent science has no political affiliation.
Where is the science?
It’s right above you in this article. Can’t you read?
Dose up Don.
They are mandating another booster.
Make sure you comply.
Lew, you lick the boots of Democrats and tyrants kicking you in the face. You belong in Cuba or North Korea. Your hatefulness is very ugly and destructive.
check your immune function see if you have covid vaccine iduced aids
you are welcome
My guess is that it is because the immune system is tanked with those shots so the nanobots can get through the blood brain barrier and the immune system will let the foreign bodies stay in the body. Our bodies fight cancer cells all the time, so when the immune system is tanked, the cancer has NO brakes and takes over in no time. People who got the shots are also Stage 4 in a very short time (which usually takes years)
That would be my cousin John, whose first prostate cancer diagnosis placed him at stage 4, with 3-6 months to live.
A man I knew, in his seventies but still very healthy and active, who jogged miles every day and ran in competitive marathons, suddenly began having extreme confusion to the point of getting lost in his own neighborhood. At first, doctors thought he had Alzheimer’s but, further testing revealed he had brain cancer. After being fully vaccinated, of course. 6 weeks later, he was dead. I don’t know if his case was reported to VAERS but, I strongly believe the virulence of his cancer was due to the vaccine.
I’m PRO boosters…for everyone that did this to the people AND the ones that shamed others into it.
[…] – U.S. Government data confirms a 143,233% increase in Cancer cases due to COVID Vaccination […]
To keep a sound argumentation against COVID vaccines, one must not fall into simple conclusions like the above, cos there’s no way to conclude such increase from VEARS.
Why? Because then one would have to know that the reporting has been identical during Corona and before – and most likely hasn’t.
Doctors and more cloud have been much more aware that vaccines can cause problems because it’s experimental, thus it’s very likely that they reported much more than before to VAERS. So background data is missing many reports and cannot be used as background data. It’s sadly typical statistical manipulation – same used by the pro COVID vax.
The only way to conclude anything is by random samples of a number og vaxed and unvaxed with and without flu shots (if that’s interesting to compare with) and compare these.
Wait, so you mean the only way to confirm that the rates of cancer among those who received the vaccine have increased, is to do an actual study? Wow, this is news to me.
Don’t understand your sarcasm – so you find it okay to use statistics wrongfully because no real studies have been made – just so it fits with your narrative? How is that any better than the narrative you’re against?
Wrong data against other wrong data doesn’t make any of them right – and there’s nothing true about the huge increase mentioned except that it’s calculated correctly (correct not equal true). I’m sure one could take another vaccine with just 10 reports and one cancer, and them that would show that the COVID vax is 100.000% less dangerous. Both results correct, but false.
Your reasoning is humbug. VAERS data is VAERS data, so the authors are not comparing it with a bogus sample like the one you made up in your head. The VAERS data is equally real and totally comparable before and after the pandemic. There couldn’t be a more scientific comparison and “random samples” of VAERS data is not needed. VAERS data IS a random sample of the underlying, unreported reality. Unless you can prove that somehow it isn’t random. And don’t repeat the nonsense about doctors being more ready to report anything because of the higher risk. The vast majority of doctors have been acting in just the opposite way — peddling and sometimes even demanding their patients get the Doctor Mengele jab; they get paid for it by Big Pharma. If anything, they have been reporting to VAERS less; otherwise, if they had been bothering their ass with VAERS, they would have taken alarm and revolted against the genocide.
And the average doctor’s underreporting to VAERS makes the comparison that this article made MORE CONSERVATIVE THAN RANDOM. Got it, Ole Shill?
Doctors, where I live and work in the medical field in France, are in total denial about side effects. Their standard reply: ‘It’s nothing to do with the vaccine’ When one of my patients complained about intense fatique and weakness since the 2nd dose, the reply was ‘Oh well, we’ve not had much of a summer, I’ll give you some Vit D. Really?! So, obviously they don’t do any reporting either, hence statistics are totally unreliable. On top of that they earn some 100.000 euros per year extra just by ‘experimenting’. Also, if they do admit to these side effects, one actually killed my brother, they would not be able to live with themselves, because officially or unofficially, they’ve pushed the plunger of the syringe, and they have killed, handicapped, sterilized, paralyzed, changed people’s lives forever with their actions. Could you live with yourself? So the only way out is to deny and not report.
I absolutely concur with you – I know of people died and permanently damaged from the vaccine, but only 1 person who complains about loss of smell due to COVID-19.
But! Untrustworthy statistics does not make any difference to this problem. Any any doctor can use my argumentation and thus just call people conspiratics or bad mathematician’s, and then you’re further behind getting the truth out.
Nah, you can refute the slander just by using basic scientific reasoning.
This is really stupid reasoning, Ole Nitwit. We know you’re a Big Pharma troll pretending to be one of us.
There is no PLAUSIBLE reason whatsoever why the reporting would have been different before versus after Covid. The situation is just the reverse of what you claim. Doctors are not on their guard at all. They are immune from lawsuits so long as they were following the CDC, and the CDC and the Biden Admin and the whole rest of the institutions controlled by the Davos devils have been relentlessly thundering the refrain “SAEF AND EFFECTIVE”. Anyone who has been following the news even casually and unconscionable persecution of the very few alert doctors and medical whistle-blowers will know quite well that VAERS has been, if anything, LESS used than in the recent past. The fact that the vaccine is experimental is off the radar screen of literally everyone who depends on the Meanstreak Media to tell them what “Reality” is. The Media not only didn’t warn anybody, they censored, ridiculed and abetted the persecution of anyone else who did warn. That is why it was possible for the cancer rate to rise to such unheard-of extreme proportions. Differences in probability like the usage of VAERS over time are always marginal, never this extreme, esp. in a case like this where reporting to VAERS is entirely voluntary. Even if doctors knew the jab was experimental — AND THEY AND WE WERE ALL TOLD JUST THE OPPOSITE — they still didn’t care. If they had cared, they never would have cooperated with the CDC and US govt in shoving it down our throat. That alone proves conclusively that there was none of this big skyrocketing of concern that you fantasize to match the skyrocketing of sudden stage-4 cancer cases. Nothing like this has ever been seen before, and if doctors had cared they would have boycotted an experiment that so blatantly violated both US law and international conventions like the Nuremberg Code.
[…] Read More: U.S. Government data confirms a 143,233% increase in Cancer cases due to COVID Vaccinatio… […]
How can you claim that cancer cases increased by 143,233%, without actually looking at any cases of cancer? I am confused by this statement: “U.S. Government data confirms the risk of developing cancer following Covid-19 vaccination increases by a shocking 143,233%.” 1,752,735 people were diagnosed with cancer in the US in 2019 before vaccines were a thing, so does that mean that 2,512,247,658 people in the US have been diagnosed with cancer now that we have the vaccine?
NO, stupid! It means the number of cancer cases DUE TO VACCINATION has increased by 143,233%. Don’t you have a brain in your head? Of course not. You’re a Big Pharma shill. The best you can do is hope there are turkeys out there who are dumber still than you are.
[…] Read More: U.S. Government data confirms a 143,233% increase in Cancer cases due to COVID Vaccinatio… […]
[…] U.S. Government data confirms a 143,233% increase in Cancer cases due to COVID Vaccination…Unfortunately, it appears the disease may be on the rise thanks to the experimental Covid-19 injections. Because official U.S. Government data confirms the risk of developing cancer following Covid-19 vaccination increases by a shocking 143,233%. […]
Great article. You’re using VAERS. We all know, those who are CTs know VAERS is not accurate. 1% of what they report. That would indicate it is much much worse than we think. Did you see the mRNA report of the 200,000 in the trials from 2010? 199,995 have died.
Harvard Med School reckoned that VAERS is underreported by a factor of 40. And that is a conservative estimate.
[…] by Rhoda Wilson, Daily Expose: […]
[…] An analysis by The Expose on VAERS data also indicated an uptick of cancer after COVID-19 vaccines by 143,233 percent. […]
[…] An analysis by The Expose on VAERS data also indicated an uptick of cancer after COVID-19 vaccines by 143,233 percent. […]
[…] An analysis by The Expose on VAERS data also indicated an uptick of cancer after COVID-19 vaccines by 143,233 percent. […]
I’d like to share your article with friends but the calculation got me a bit confused.
“… the number of adverse events related to cancer reported per 100,000 doses of flu vaccine administered equates to just 0.0003 per 100,000 doses.”
But I think 64/1,720,400,000*100,000=0.003, and thus, 0.43/0.003=143. Am I wrong or is it your miscalculation?
May I have your reply? Thanks.
[…] An analysis by The Expose on VAERS data also indicated an uptick of cancer after COVID-19 vaccines by 143,233 percent. […]
[…] An analysis by The Expose on VAERS data also indicated an uptick of cancer after COVID-19 vaccines by 143,233 percent. […]
[…] U.S. Government data confirms a 143,233% increase in Cancer cases due to COVID Vaccination […]
[…] An analysis by The Expose on VAERS data also indicated an uptick of cancer after COVID-19 vaccines by 143,233 percent. […]
[…] U.S. Government data confirms a 143,233% increase in Cancer cases due to COVID Vaccination …Unfortunately, it appears the disease may be on the rise thanks to the experimental Covid-19 injections. Because official U.S. Government data confirms the risk of developing cancer following Covid-19 vaccination increases by a shocking 143,233%. […]
[…] An analysis by The Expose on VAERS data also indicated an uptick of cancer after COVID-19 vaccines by 143,233 percent. […]
[…] An analysis by The Expose on VAERS data also indicated an uptick of cancer after COVID-19 vaccines by 143,233 percent. […]
[…] U.S. Government data confirms the risk of developing cancer following Covid-19 vaccination increases… […]
Are you guys on glue or just bad at
math? If you take a 144,xxx% increase in cancer to the 1,752,735 reported cases in the US last year…that’s 2.5 Billion.
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.
– Samuel Adams
The evils of tyranny are seldom seen but by him who resists it.
– Thomas Jefferson
This article is a kind of manipulative. The link (https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html) has a disclaimer that says: “…VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness…”
[…] — Daniel Otarola (@danotarola) August 21, 2022 U.S. Government data confirms a 143,233% increase in Cancer cases due to COVID Vaccination […]
[…] Μια ανάλυση από το The Expose στα δεδομένα VAERS έδειξε επίσης αύξηση του καρκίνου μετά τα εμβόλια COVID-19 κατά 143.233 τοις εκατό. […]
[…] […]
[…] This article was originally published by Rhoda Wilson at The Exposé. […]
[…] U.S. Government data confirms the risk of developing cancer following Covid-19 vaccination increases… […]
[…] Fuente: https://expose-news.com/2022/08/16/us-gov-covid-vaccination-risk-cancer-143233-percent/ […]
[…] The Expose reports: […]
[…] 视频引用文章链接:U.S. Government data confirms a 143,233% increase in Cancer cases due to COVID Vaccination […]
Whatever anyone believes about the safety of the vaccine, these figures are ridiculous. Considering that about 1/3 of the population eventually gets cancer (actually it’s a bit higher), a 300% increase would imply that everyone gets it. 140000% increase would mean everyone gets cancer 500 times in their life.
[…] 名無しさん@恐縮です 【悲報】mRNA接種者の癌リスク1400倍w https://expose-news.com/2022/08/16/us-gov-covid-vaccination-risk-cancer-143233-percent/ 160: 名無しさん@恐縮です >>153 それも反ワクに歪曲されたデマな […]
[…] Un’analisi di The Expose sui dati VAERS ha indicato un aumento del cancro del 143.233% tra le persone vaccinate contro il Covid-19. […]
[…] 143% aukning krabbameinstilfella eftir að COVID ,,bólusetningar” hófust […]
[…] Izvor: “U.S. Government data confirms a 143,233% increase in Cancer cases due to COVID Vaccination“ […]
[…] An analysis by The Expose on VAERS data also indicated an uptick of cancer after COVID-19 vaccines by 143,233 percent. […]
[…] 2022.10.29 U.S. Government data confirms a 143,233% increase in Cancer cases due to COVID Vaccination […]
[…] An analysis by The Expose on VAERS data also indicated an uptick of cancer after COVID-19 vaccines by 143,233 percent. […]
[…] US- 143,233% increase in Cancer cases due to COVID Vaccination […]
[…] which cited data from the U.S. government showing that those vaccinated against COVID-19 are a shocking 143,233 percent more likely to be diagnosed with cancer compared to people vaccinated against the […]