Breaking News

Pfizer’s figures for its new Bivalent Omicron Vaccine prove that the Old COVID Vax had a minus-44% negative efficacy after just 30 days

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

We have been sold an antivaccine as a vaccine.

The old Pfizer COVID injection destroys the immune system at a rate greater than 1% per day.

By a concerned reader

According to Pfizer –

“Pfizer and BioNTech’s bivalent vaccine contains 15-µg of mRNA encoding the wild-type spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, which is present in the Original Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and 15-µg of mRNA encoding the spike protein of the Omicron | BA.4/BA.5 subvariants.

“Because the Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 subvariants contain identical spike protein amino acid sequences, both can be targeted at once with a single mRNA strand.

“Apart from the addition of the mRNA sequence of the Omicron BA.4/BA.5 spike protein, all other components of the vaccine remain unchanged.” –

“One month after administration, a booster dose of the Omicron-adapted monovalent candidates (30 µg and 60 µg) increased neutralizing (antibody) geometric mean titers (GMT) against Omicron BA.1 13.5 and 19.6-fold above pre-booster dose levels, while a booster dose of the Omicron-adapted bivalent candidates conferred a 9.1 and 10.9-fold increase in neutralizing (antibody) GMTs against Omicron BA.1.

“Both Omicron-adapted vaccine candidates were well-tolerated in participants who received one or the other Omicron-adapted vaccine” .

From this information, we shall now prove that the original vaccine shots destroy the immune system at a rate of 44% per month.

We have known that the vaccines in effect cause VAIDS. But we had not realised how quickly they do that until now…

Putting these results into a tabular form we get –

Looking at the table above we see that adding 30 ug of the original Pfizer vaccine against Wuhan Hu1 (that everybody has taken for the 1st and 2nd shots and the boosters up until September 2022), to 30ug of the new Omicron BA4/5 vaccine component decreases its effectiveness after one month from 19.6x to 10.9x a reduction of 44%.

Likewise adding 15ug of the old Wuhan Hu1 vaccine decreases the effectiveness of 15ug of the new Omicron BA4/5 vaccine component from 13.5x to 9.1x, a reduction of 33%.

Tabulating these results for Omicron BA1 neutralising antibody increase after one month we get the following –

These results lay bare what the Exposé has been demonstrating from government infection hospitalisation and death figures all over the world, many of which have now stopped publishing the relevant figures because they were worsening by the week and clearly displaying how lethal the vaccines are.

The original Pfizer vaccine not only had no efficacy against Omicron. It also progressively destroyed your immune system at the rate displayed above. It was an anti-vaccine against Omicron. It never had any positive effect on Omicron antibody levels.

Furthermore, 30 days after your Pfizer booster shot (30 ug of vaccine against Wuhan Hu1) you would have had 44% fewer antibodies against Omicron than you had before you took the booster according to Pfizer’s own figures.

It was NEVER an immunity booster.

It was always an immunity disruptor, an immunity compromiser, an immunity nullifier, an immunity degrader, an immunity reducer. It was an incredibly effective immunity destroyer.

Within 30 days of taking your Pfizer booster, you lost 44% of your first level (antibody) immune response against the original Omicron variant BA1. That is why the infection rates in the vaccinated were so much worse than the infection rates in the unvaccinated for Omicron.

We no longer need government figures to see this. Because Pfizer has gone and done it for us. Their figures clearly show that the original vaccine causes a new form of Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS) at an alarmingly fast rate of over 1% per day.

They were so keen to show the world how effective their new shots were, that they overlooked the fact that their data also proved how anti-effective their old shots were.


I need to state this again clearly because it is so important.

Pfizer’s figures for the new vax versus the old vax prove that the old vax did not work against Omicron.

Pfizer’s bivalent versus monovalent trial results shows that one shot (30ug) of the old vaccine destroys 44% of your Covid19 antibodies in 30 days.

Since one is not considered boosted until 14 days after the shot, it follows that the old boosters were never vaccines, they were always anti-vaccines, having a negative efficacy by day 14.

Most Pfizer vaccinations taken by the majority of humans on the planet prior to September 2022, have systematically destroyed their immune response at an initial rate greater than 1% per day (44% in 30 days).

Most Pfizer-vaccinated people now have VAIDS, and winter is coming.

I remember when I wrote an article analysing German government figures out of the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin. THey showed that vaccinated Germans were 8.1x more likely to be infected with Omicron than unvaccinated Germans.

I then looked at the official figures for Australia, and they showed that vaccinated people were more than 10x likely to be infected than the unvaxxed.

The German government immediately changed their figures and claimed: “Oh we made a mistake”.

They found another 911 unvaccinated people who had allegedly caught Omicron.

Are we really to believe that Germans, the best mechanical engineers in the world, routinely make mistakes with numbers?

This was no mistake. The Australian figures confirmed it back then. And Pfizer’s results above confirm it today.

There are half a million people in the UK with compromised immune systems. Many of them have absolutely zero antibodies to Omicron.

Jeremy Vine on BBC Radio 2 actually did a reasonable documentary on them on Thursday, September 1 from 12:00 – 14:00. These people are condemned to spend the rest of their lives in total isolation having had 5 or 6 Covid vaccinations to no good end.

Their immune system can no longer produce ANY antibodies to Omicron. Jeremy interviewed several of them who confirmed that the COVID vaccines are useless for them. The government did not pay for them to discover that they had zero antibodies after 5 or 6 vaccinations. They had to have private testing done, which they paid for themselves, in order to find that out.

The solution for them is a drug called Evushield, which is a monoclonal antibody concoction. It literally gives them the antibodies that their immune system can no longer make. It is the Covid equivalent to antiretrovirals for AIDS.

The MHRA authorised the drug in March for immuno-compromised people. But you cannot get it on the NHS and you need 2 shots at £800 per shot. Many cannot afford it. So much for the NHS caring about the health of this country.

Obviously, if you cannot interact with anybody face to face, your earning capacity will be seriously reduced and the taxes you pay every year will likewise be significantly reduced. The idea that such a person is not worth £1600 to the economy over the rest of their lives is absurd.

An investment of £1600 would most likely be repaid within a year by the overall improvement to the economy from having another fit and healthy working person. And that is just the economic argument.

The social argument need not even be mentioned. Liz Truss is about to spend 200 Billion on energy apparently. We could fix every immuno-compromised person in the land for less than 1 billion. But that would not get any computer-generated Wuhan Hu1 spike proteins into them now, would it?

These immuno-compromised people had weak immunity to begin with and now have absolutely zero immunity in many cases. That is where we will all end up if we continue taking any vaccination containing the genetic code for Covid spike proteins or taking the spike proteins themselves as is the case with the Novavax vaccine.

One woman interviewed on the radio said that she had not had a hug in 2½ years. Jeremy Vine suggested that the government paid for Covid tested huggers to go and visit people like her. At least that gave her a laugh.

The tragic thing about these immune deficient people is that they are the ones least able to tolerate the immune system destruction mediated by the vaccines and yet they were always the first to be recommended to take the next shot.

They are the victims of the grossest medical negligence. They should all be given Evushield for that reason alone.

Pfizer has demonstrated a 44% immune degradation in 30 days at 30ug of the original Pfizer vaccine (the standard vaccine dose). I wonder if they will ever publish the 60 and 90-day figures?

There is no commercial need so to do, now that they have approval from all the regulators after a 30-day clinical trial. They stopped the 3½-year clinical trial number NCT04368728 from 2020 July 27 to 2024 February 8 of the original vaccine after 6 months, when they permitted the placebo group to become vaccinated.

A 30-day clinical trial is not a completed clinical trial. It is a joke. Fauci himself said recently that we don’t have time to finish the clinical trials of the bivalent booster.

They could have made an omicron booster 8 months ago, in which case they would have had time. They could have made a delta booster a year ago. But they plainly have no interest in providing an up-to-date booster. They just want an excuse to fill the public full of the original computer-generated spike proteins.

The FDA Authorised the Wrong Vaccine

30ug of the new monovalent Pfizer vaccine increased neutralising antibodies by 19.6x after 30 days.

15ug + 15ug of the bivalent Pfizer vaccine increased neutralising antibodies by 9.1x after 30 days.

So the monovalent vaccine, the fully updated vaccine, was 2.15x better (19.6/9.1) than the bivalent vaccine.

It produced actually 115% more antibodies against Omicron than the bivalent vax, because it was fully updated rather than partially updated. The only disadvantage to the monovalent vaccine for the authorities is that it does not fill you up with computer-generated Wuhan Hu1 spike proteins.

So which one did the FDA authorise?

They authorised the bivalent one of course. They did not authorise the monovalent one.

What’s happening here is that the old vaccine, designed against Wuhan Hu1 (which was never isolated and was computer generated and I doubt was ever in circulation) has zero efficacy against Omicron. All it does is progressively damage your immune system.

Whereas the new vaccine, being designed against Omicron, does have good initial efficacy against it as the figures above demonstrate. But all Covid variant spike proteins are anti-vaccines to the entire immune system and cause Vaccine Mediated AIDS progressively as more and more spike proteins infect your T cells.

This is true for both the new and old vaccines.


We have been sold an anti-vaccine for Omicron as a vaccine for Omicron and Pfizer’s own figures now show it.

The reason the reduction in efficacy after 30 days is 11% higher with the 30ug + 30ug shot than it is with the 15ug + 15ug shot is that the larger the dose, the more spike proteins your body makes and the more damage they do to your immune system in 30 days.

If you want to cause no damage to your immune system then do not put any spike proteins or spike protein-producing vaccines into your body.

There is a great new study from Harvard, John’s Hopkins, Oxford, Edinburgh, California and other Universities showing that for every 1 person whom the vaccines saved from hospitalisation (according to government figures), 18-98 people suffered serious life-altering adverse reactions.

It is an amazing world wherein such prestigious universities are 6 months behind writers for the Exposé.

There was a fascinating comment by a switched-on woman in the Telegraph. She asked:

‘Is this whole Covid thing some kind of intelligence test?’

A brainwashing test from the globalist demons and a wisdom test from the nationalist God of freedom, who forced us into nations at Babel in order to prevent a global political monopoly such as the WEF, would be my answer.

Extrapolation of Results (for Mathematicians)

We can project forward the antibody levels post-vaccination in the bivalent vaccinated compared to the monovalent vaccinated month by month by continuing to reduce them by 44.4% and 32.6% respectively every 30 days as follows

This analysis projects only the extra reduction in antibody levels caused by adding an equal quantity of the old vax to the new vax. It does not include the reduction in antibodies caused by the new vax spike proteins themselves. It also fails to take account of the fact that your immune system is gradually wiping out vaccinated cells, So that spike protein production will fall off progressively throughout the extrapolated period which will reduce the rate of attrition of antibodies. These two omitted factors are opposite in effect.

We know how much damage 30ug of spike protein (either new or old) does in the first month. It is 32.6%. So we should reduce all the figures above by an extra 32.6% per month.

We also know that spike protein production tails off reasonably quickly at more or less the same rate. So we shall assume that these two effects more or less cancel each other out.

The fascinating thing about the extrapolation is that the lower dose does much better than the higher dose from month 2 onwards (being less destructive to the immune system). This supports something I have been saying from the start of the vaccination program, namely that the doses are way too high. They are gene therapy doses, not vaccination doses.

The 60 ug shot fails to provide any extra protection and starts to go negative at 5 months.
The 30 ug shot fails to provide any extra protection and starts to go negative at 7 months.

A 1 ug shot would have provided extra protection for the entire pandemic and would not have caused nearly as many adverse reactions and would have killed almost nobody because most immune systems would have been able to deal with the 30x smaller number of spikes.

So here is what the new shots should have been if you are going to permit mRNA shots. Of course, nobody will implement this because the shots are not about health. But I am entitled to use hindsight here because the bivalent shots were both made and approved with hindsight available.

1. Use the 87½% of non-spike viral proteins rather than the 12½% of viral spike proteins
2. Reduce the dose from 30ug to 1ug
3. Regularly update the vaccination to include non-spike protein parts only from variants actually in circulation as we do with flu shots
4, Do not substitute Uracil for N1 Methyl Pseudouridine in the mRNA coding for the viral parts. That is a lethal gene hack that should never be approved by any regulator with any understanding of genetics.

But giving anybody a gene therapy shot for which no clinical studies have ever been permitted to continue for more than 6 months is extreme medical fraud (any act OR OMISSION intended to deceive).

And giving people a gene therapy shot for which no clinical studies have lasted more than 30 days is likewise criminal.

Any doctor who vaccinates people with these bivalent jabs knowing the Pfizer results above or knowing that we presently have only 30 days of clinical trial data to support them should be suspended. He has broken the Hippocratic oath. Indeed the administrations of the CDC, the FDA and the MHRA should be sacked for recommending and approving them.

The Novavax approach applied to the above would have been the best and most benign vaccination answer (indeed that is precisely what we presently do with flu shots and Covid19 is just another type of flu). But vitamin D3, direct sunlight, mouthwashes containing Cetyl Pyridinium Chloride and spending an hour breathing chlorinated air in an indoor pool facility, Ivermectin, Hydroxy Chloroquine and monoclonal antibodies are all more effective and less dangerous.

I am a supporter of Trump simply because he is not a politician. But his ‘Operation Warp Speed’ was and continues to be the worst medical intervention in the history of healthcare. And the sooner he recognises it the better. I suspect that he does recognise it but cannot publicly declare his position politically.

With regard to the extrapolation above, the performance of the new vaccinations is better than that of the old ones because they actually code for a variant in circulation (to some extent), rather than a computer-generated artefact that has never been isolated and was never in circulation IMHO. So they produce more directly focused protection.

But they are just as lethal to the immune system, the cardiovascular system and the central nervous system and to all body organs.

So they start from a higher point and their protection against the alleged Omicron variant lasts longer (7 months rather than 0 months).

But the spikes and the fake uracil are just as destructive to your general health as the old vaccine was. So their VAERS results will be equally as bad. So they are in effect just a greater fool’s paradise than their predecessors.

Share this page to Telegram
5 2 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bob - Enough
Bob - Enough
1 year ago

Scary and worrying as h3ll. But please stop using the term vaccine and stop the nonsense about Wuhan as in your statement “Looking at the table above we see that adding 30 ug of the original Pfizer vaccine against Wuhan Hu1″…

Reply to  Bob - Enough
11 months ago

My Friend mom makes 45 US dollars an hour on the internet . She has been out of w0rk for eight months but last month her pay check was 11,000 just w0rking on the internet for a few hours. Simply give it a shot on
the accompanying article…

Bob - Enough
Bob - Enough
Reply to  Brooklyn
11 months ago

OH that’s your Mum – fair play, spent 1 hr on the web, 1 hr in person … tell her she left some of her kit behind will you; she knows where I live. Not bad for an oldie.

1 year ago

Why do they always say it’s a vaccine when we all know it is NOT!

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Peter
1 year ago

Yeah, “The Expose”, can you call them ‘poisons’ from now on please?

It’s actually an official government term for them – seriously!

This documentation by the government of Victoria (in Australia) says: “This approval applies to a pharmacist who, at the time of the administration of the Schedule 4 poison*, namely any SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) VACCINE approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (COVID-19 VACCINE)…”

(*  Included in Schedule 4 of the Poisons Standard.)

1 year ago

I refuse to be murdered by Gates and Fauci, so I will never have this ‘vaccine’.

Bob - Enough
Bob - Enough
Reply to  Matthew
11 months ago

LOL, Gates and Fauci are no marks; the ones pulling the strings have probably already poisoned us … so just enjoy life and mock these little, weak, satanic plebs … because they really are no-marks.

KarlM Alias
KarlM Alias
11 months ago

Antibodies, especially the IgGs which are only found in the bloodstream, play only a very very minor role in fighting respiratory viruses. It is the killer T and natural killer cells which do the real business. In the case of the jabbed, the real business they do is to destroy any cell which dared to take up the mRNA abominations.
Game over, for the jabbed at least.

Jayna Dinnyes
Jayna Dinnyes
Reply to  KarlM Alias
11 months ago


11 months ago

Clarification is needed relative to the title of this article:

  • The double negative in the title renders it completely meaningless.
  • In addition a reduction in efficacy of 44% is not the same as “negative efficacy”. I’m shocked this can kind of mistake could slip by your editors.

Additional clarification is also needed regarding the first black and white table in the this article:

  • The data for the titers against Omicron BA.1 (13.5 and 19.6-fold increase) is included in the table with no mention of BA.1
  • It is also unclear how the monovalent data (30 µg and 60 µg) is represented in the table because it seems to appear in the column for the bivalent booster.

The conclusions you’ve drawn from this data, if accurate, are extremely important ~ and, for this reason, I had wanted to share this article with others, but I’m currently unable to because, as it stands, it is completely nonsensical.

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Metta
11 months ago

Yes we have to be precise.
Adding 30ug of the old vaccine to 30ug the new vaccine reduces its efficacy by 44% after 30 days.
This means that the old vaccine has a negative efficacy of 44% after 30 days.

Adding it reduced the efficacy by 44%.
Taking it alone, as everybody did up until September22, produced a negative efficacy of 44% after 30 day which is a total disaster.

You could add this comment to the article when sharing it.

11 months ago

[…] – Pfizer’s figures for its new Bivalent Omicron Vaccine prove that the Old COVID Vax had a minus-44%… […]

11 months ago

[…] Pfizer’s figures for its new Bivalent Omicron Vaccine prove that the Old COVID Vax had a minus-44%…We have been sold an antivaccine as a vaccine. The old Pfizer COVID injection destroys the immune system at a rate greater than 1% per day. […]

11 months ago

[…] Pfizer’s figures for its new Bivalent Omicron Vaccine prove that the Old COVID Vax had a minus-44%… We have been sold an antivaccine as a vaccine. The old Pfizer COVID injection destroys the immune system at a rate greater than 1% per day. […]

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
11 months ago

There is one thing I overlooked when writing this article.

THe immune system has a limited capacity to make antibodies. These shots push it close to capacity as can be seen by the 30ug shot only producing 45% more antibodies than the 15ug shot (rather than the expected 100% more were it not near capacity).

Adding 30ug of the old vax to the new vaccine will divert half of the antibody making resources away from useful antibodies to useless antibodies. That will account for some of the reduction in efficacy. But it does not account for all of it because.we are seeing 44% reduction in circumstances where antibody production does go up by 45% with a doubling of the dose not 0%.

So we can now take that into account and recalculate the true damage done by the old vax (I mean 44% in 30 days is too high). 45% more antibodies are made in total and half are useless which means that the number of useful antibodies is 145%/2 or 72.5%. So we should have seen 72.5% of 19.6x or a 14.2x increase, taking account of the diversion to useless antibody production and the capacity restraint

So the true damage done by the old vax (excluding the loss of efficacy due to diverted production) was from 14.2x to 13.5x in 30 days. Which is a 9.5% reduction in efficacy in 30 days NOT 44%.

But thereagain the vaccine takes 14 days to get going and start causing serious immunological damage (it causes cardiovascular and neurological damage and death much sooner). But only after 14 days are people regarded as ‘vaccinated’. So it will be ramping up actually from day 1 to day 14 in a italicised S shaped curve. We take this as linear that effecitly knock 7 days of effectivenss (half of 14) out of the caclulation. So really it is more like 9.5% in 23 days.

Now that is a calculation that makes a burnt out mathematician happy.

I will rewrite the article and the projection based on 9.5% immune system destruction every 23 days (rather than 44% every 30 days).

This means that in 230 days your immune system is degraded down to 33% of initial capacity. Or the old vax had a -67% efficacy after 230 days.

That is about right for one shot. Obviously 4 shots are a total and utter immunological disaster- which just happens to be perfect for Big Pharma profits.

So Pfizers figures prove that the vaccine is a Trojan. Perhaps I should call it Pfizer’s Trojan?