Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Yesterday, the UK Parliament again debated the trend in excess deaths. It follows on from an Adjournment debate held on 20 October 2023.
“Far too many young people are dying,” Andrew Bridgen, Member of Parliament (“MP”) for North West Leicestershire, said opening the debate in Westminster Hall.
“Far from being below the recent rolling average, excess deaths in 2022 were above that average: 6% above. In 2023, when one might have expected deaths to finally fall below the average, the excess was also 6% above. Those numbers are higher in the younger age groups,” he said.
“No one with integrity can fail to be troubled by those figures,” he added.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Alexander Stafford, MP for Rother Valley, noted that his constituents are very concerned about the excess deaths in his area. “They are also concerned about the almost deafening silence from the NHS about what is causing this,” he said.
Mr. Bridgen explained that correlation is not causation but it is an alarm bell. “Alarm bells are going off all over the building, but no one wants to open the door to see whether there is a fire,” he said.
He asked why no one was listening to those raising the alarm, noting that Professor Carl Heneghan, director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford, had reviewed the causes of excess deaths and concluded that they are predominantly related to cardiovascular disease.
Mr. Bridgen also noted that consultant cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra had also been raising the alarm. He referred to a TNT Radio interview with Dr. Malhotra on Monday.
“[Dr. Malhotra] told TNT Radio that even though cardiovascular disease is multifactorial, top of the list in the hierarchy of causes behind excess cardiac-related deaths has to be the experimental covid mRNA vaccine until proven otherwise. This is not speculative,” Mr. Bridgen said.
“Those who choose not to acknowledge these cold, hard facts are either unaware of the evidence, wilfully blind or lacking in conscience,” he added.
“The so-called covid inquiry has already set out the answers it wants to get. It has all the appearance of a whitewash,” Mr. Bridgen said. “It was deeply disappointing that it announced this week that the module on the safety and efficacy of the vaccines has been put off indefinitely – certainly until after the general election, which is extremely disappointing.”
Mr. Bridgen feels that the Covid Inquiry has delayed the module on vaccines as “political pressure has been placed on the inquiry” due to upcoming general elections.
It is not the old and frail now dying, as it was with covid, Mr. Bridgen said. “There has been incessant week-on-week excess mortality for months and months in the young and middle-aged. Every age group is affected, but the 50 to 64 age group has had it worst … They were struck with 12% more deaths than usual in 2022 and 13% more in 2023, and at least five in six of those deaths this year had nothing to do with covid whatever.”
“For two years we have turned society upside down so as not to “kill granny”. Now that mum and dad are dying, it appears that no one cares.”
“The public inquiry should urgently be looking at this issue,” Mr Bridgen said. “Instead, it is wasting taxpayers’ money on obsessing over WhatsApp messages while people are dying.”
“Before I was expelled from the Conservative party for voicing my concerns over the experimental vaccines and the harms I believe they caused, I met a senior member of the party who, after listening to my concerns about the vaccines and NG163 – the midazolam and morphine scandal – told me quite calmly, ‘Andrew, there is currently no political appetite for your views on the vaccines. There may well be in 20 years’ time and you will probably be proven right, but in the meantime, you need to bear in mind that you are taking on the most powerful vested interest in the world, with all the personal risk for you that that will entail’.
“People have alleged that I am spouting conspiracy theories,” Mr. Bridgen said. “I think it is a conspiracy; a conspiracy against the science, a conspiracy of silence and a conspiracy against the people – and I will have none of it.”
Later in the debate, Jim Shannon, MP for Strangford, said that the facts on excess deaths raised by Mr. Bridgen called for an investigation.
“It could well be that the increase has nothing to do with the vaccine, but we must look into why fit young men, or fit, non-smoking, healthy-weight women in their 50s, are having heart attacks, and their consultants are asking them, ‘Which injection did you take?’ … Those are signals that there are questions to be asked … I support the calls for an investigation and ask for one to be carried out,” Mr. Shannon said.
In her reply, Maria Caulfield, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, acknowledged that there is an increase in excess deaths. “A number of factors contribute to that. We take that seriously, and monitor it constantly,” she said.
She relied on a statistic that 93.6% of the population had at least one dose of the “vaccine” to explain why a high number of vaccinated people appear in the excess death population. It’s not true that 93.6% of the population are covid vaccinated.
In July 2022, BBC also tried to claim that 92% of the population had received at least one dose of the covid “vaccine.” It was a lie.
Professor Norman Fenton published an article demonstrating that the UK Health Security Agency’s (“UKHSA’s”) latest report at the time showed that almost 30% of the population, of all ages, had not had even one dose of Covid injections, with 20% of the population over the age of 18 being vaccine free.
There is little to no chance, with all the harms and deaths that have come to light, that the number of people accepting covid vaccines has increased since then.
“No vaccine or medicine – even simple paracetamol – is completely risk-free,” Caulfield claimed, “but we have systems in place to continually monitor the safety of our medicines.”
“I reassure colleagues that we absolutely acknowledge that there is a risk of excess deaths,” Caulfield said. “We are working towards how we reduce that as quickly as possible, but the lockdowns have had a negative effect in many cases. We are also mindful of the safety of vaccinations, and have taken action when safety concerns have been raised.”
Some of Caulfield’s colleagues may have been, but do you feel reassured?
The transcript of the 90-minute ‘Excess Death Trends’ debate held in Westminster Hall on 16 January 2024 can be read in the Hansard HERE.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help power The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful journalism for the years to come…
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
such as Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal
are trying to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
Categories: Breaking News
Yesterday morning, on the day of the debate as chance would have it, the BBC news (Radio Four) reported that The Lancet had a study that claimed that in 2022, seven thousand hospital admissions for Covid might have been avoided if everyone had been fully vaccinated. At about 07:55, this was discussed on the Today programme (so the BBC was keen to promote it) and they interviewed a woman from the data research company that, along with the University of Edinburgh, carried out the study. I have glanced through a couple of articles (links below) on that study and it seems to me that what they are saying is in contradiction of the facts presented by Andrew Bridgen
The study used mathematical modeling and assumptions (“estimates” and “a counterfactual scenario” to quote the study) whereas Andrew Bridgen used factual data. He gave us reality not guesswork and assumptions (my phrasing). I know what I think of “modeling”.
Here it is The Lancet – “Undervaccination and severe COVID-19 outcomes: meta-analysis of national cohort studies in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales”
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(23)02467-4/fulltext
Another article – “First all-UK study of 67 million people reveals consequences of missed COVID-19 vaccines” – the Health Data Research UK (HDR UK) and the University of Edinburgh study.
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-01-uk-million-people-reveals-consequences.html
From that Lancet piece – “We estimated the reduction in severe COVID-19 outcomes associated with a counterfactual scenario in which everyone in the UK was fully vaccinated on June 1, 2022.” – “estimated” and “a counterfactual scenario”.
From the other article – “Mathematical modeling indicated that 7,180 hospitalizations and deaths out of around 40,400 severe COVID-19 outcomes during four months in summer 2022 might have been averted, if the UK population was fully vaccinated.
Under-vaccination was related to significantly more hospitalizations and deaths across all age groups studied, with under-vaccinated people over 75 more than twice as likely to have a severe COVID-19 outcome than those who were fully protected.” On this point, hear what Andrew Bridgen says at 25 minutes in – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ej5Se4gMRA
It was lucky that I heard about this study yesterday, on the day of the debate as chance would have it, from the BBC, as otherwise, I might have believed the things Andrew Bridgen said in his speech. It was good timing, very good timing.
Cómo pueden ser tan PINOCHOS si claramente se conoce ahora, por datos estadísticos recogidos de la misma Inglaterra, que el 95% de los fallecidos por COVID son de parte de los VACUNADOS, y sólo un 5% corresponde a los no vacunados. Los datos vienen de instituciones muy parecidas a Eudravigilance de Europa o el Vaers americano.
Mentieras muy grande y almas alterado..
Correction, they died because of microwave radiation and / or to killer hospital protocol.
“They cooked the lungs in Wuhan with microwave radiation” Dr Farracani, laser heart surgeon – a man who understand both, radiation and medicine.
https://www.laquintacolumna.info/translations/dr-enrique-luis-farracani-ristenpart-confirms-the-findings-of-la-quinta-columna/
Always modelling for these lying charlatans.
Covid and climate change good examples…
The debate \ Andrew Bridgen – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ej5Se4gMRA
“UK” Parliament is a Corporate fiction that has been dissolved for fraud by those with Standing to do so.
ALL Corporations Chartered since the reign of Queen Anne have also been dissolved for fraud. They are ALL null and void.
Likewise, “His Majesty” (Holy Roman Emperor) King Charles in the Sea jurisdiction and King Charles III of Scotland in the Air jurisdiction have been dissolved and are in receivership.
His Majesty Revenue and Customs. Dissolved. Null and void.
His Majesty Prison Service. Dissolved. Null and void.
ALL police forces. Dissolved. Null and void.
ALL Councils on a local and county level. Dissolved. Null and void.
In order to keep up the pretence and illusion of still existing, these dissolved Corporations are perpetuating further frauds against the people as a means to fund themselves.
Access to massive Trusts is no longer available to them.
They require legal fiction persons to contract with them as a means to extract monies and borrow credit against those extracted monies.
“UK” Parliament is a Corporate fiction” – maybe you are right, but for something that is fictional, it has a lot of clout and initiates a lot of action whereas yours is a voice in the wilderness.
It has zero clout. It’s perceived clout is in the imaginations of imbeciles.
https://annavonreitz.com/threecrownsfinal.pdf
The only Lawful Government with authority standing on the Land and Soil jurisdiction.
Law of the Land far supersedes the Corporate Sea jurisdiction and the jurisdiction of the Air.
“It’s perceived clout is in the imaginations of imbeciles.” – so all those laws it has passed are imaginary, we needn’t obey them? I wonder if any accused individual has ever tried that excuse from the dock and the judge gave up and went home.
You sir, are an uneducated, prize winning imbecile. Clueless to the facts of what is actually going on.
Clueless to the fact that many countries are setting up National Governments by and for the Living. Not Corporations and their followers living in la la land.
Here is the English version. https://theenglishcountiesassembly.co.uk/
I’m sure you will find a lot of support in prisons when you tell them that laws are imaginary and therefore their incarceration is not lawful and they should be released.
Do you obey the law of the land, do you pay your taxes?
It is illegal to pay taxes that are used to fund terrorism and genocide with a maximum 14 year prison sentence.
It is also illegal to open mail addressed to legal fiction persons. 10 years in prison for mail fraud. 14 years in prison for identity theft.
“It is illegal to pay taxes that are used to fund terrorism and genocide with a maximum 14 year prison sentence” – I presume that if it carries a prison sentence then it is illegal. What insults are you going cast at me for making this point that exposes your lack of logical thinking? And you called me an imbecile – ha.
You will find that Law which stands way above any Corporate statute nonsense on the United Nations website. That Law was chartered after WWII and still stands.
This is another sneaky tactic – avoidance, not giving a straight answer. I asked “Do you obey the law of the land, do you pay your taxes?”. You didn’t answer, you avoided answering with some more crazed ranting.
Not in the system. Haven’t been since 2019. Men and women DO NOT pay taxes. Only fools that think/claim they are the legal fiction person.
Facts and Truths it appears don’t agree with your imbecilic mind.
You spout garbage with very little or no understanding/concept of jurisdiction, who has it and who doesn’t.
Truths and facts are shared. Educate yourself to reality because you are sorely lacking in that department.
You will do well to listen to the last 2 webinars (8th and 15th Jan) from the Fiduciary of the actual American Government. Which incidentally I have listened to since 2019.
https://webinarsearch.americanstatenationals.org/index.php/january-2024/
If you think this Fiduciary has no clout and talks garbage, I will share with you her email address so you can pit your limited knowledge against 50 years worth.
Good day to you.
I see that you are another like Demented – quick to resort to insults and abuse. I can see your point, and all I did was to point out the way things are rather than how you would lie them to be and you started calling me names. You did that because you can see that I am right and, having no sensible reply to my comments, you started name calling. In my first reply I said “You might be right”. I can see your point, and all I did was to point out the way things are rather than how you would like them to be and you started calling me names.
Look at another of your tactics – adding “Sir” to give the pretense of politeness. Demented also tried to inject a pretense of politeness to mask his rudeness and shameful dishonesty. He also made false allegations and misrepresented things I said – dishonesty. He had many other scurrilous and shameful tactics – again, used because I outwitted him, so that was all he had – mockery, insults and abuse. With moral and ethical values values like that, your sort should work for the Post Office. You’d fit in well.
Oh glory! That’s a nasty bit of butthurt you’re still suffering from W.S.
Oops! Amazed that got posted, someone must have a very similar email address. It is me =)
Hi John, I’m only weighing into this exchange because its not necessary to resort to name calling.
The fact is, all positive law is used and manipulated by those who want to gain power and control. If the law doesn’t suit them or their objectives, they ignore or change them. Those that seek to rule the world are lawless. Irrespective of what positive law says, those that are controlling the narrative will take the power and control away from us.
In my mind, all positive law needs to come down but, practically, that is not possible. What is possible is that all positive law is subject to Natural Law and people only resort to positive law when the Natural law court cannot settle the issue. In other words, at local level Natural Law courts need to be established. And at national level, the Supreme Court and governments, e.g. parliaments, which represent the highest bodies in the positive law system must be answerable to a higher Natural Law Court.
There is little to be gained by allowing specific aspects of positive law to cause division between those who are all fighting in many different ways, on different aspects, to preserve our rights and freedoms or regain what we’ve already lost. The aspects of positive law which you seem to be focusing on are only the tip of the iceberg and can be argued in many ways in a positive court of law – what you propose could lose in one of their courts and so set a precedent that is unfavourable to us for as long as common law is the law of the land, with no oversight.
Perhaps Anna Von Reitz (whoever she is?) is to blame for John’s “name calling”?
He relentlessly promotes her website: but what an absolute shoddy witness he is? I have not once clicked on it, I wonder why?
If this is how he behaves, why follow his master? Dreadful testimony.
Hi Islander, All I’m really asking is everyone try to treat others with respect. There are people we should be angry with and we should try to direct our anger at those who are trying to harm and/or control us, not at each other.
I agree; is that why it it is called “divide and conquer”?
The pitchfork army ought to first discern who the enemy is before attacking each other.
I have been reading Anna von Reitz blogs since 2014 and out of the 4500 + blogs she has penned only a very few have raised an eyebrow
to me she is a most remarkable woman with immense knowledge in law and history and extremely balanced and compassionate
do not let the other John put you off with his zeal and frustration if she got the widespread backing she needs so many problems world wide would be resolved
If a king that isn’t a king has been foreclosed and in receivership in 2 jurisdictions, what laws (statutes, acts) are you referring to?
Do such statutes and acts rely on royal ascent?
Again, if the imaginary royalty is no longer in existence, with Charles Windsor having zero standing and effectively Stateless, what laws?
https://annavonreitz.com/lotofbadlaw.pdf
“His Majesty Revenue and Customs. Dissolved. Null and void.” – really? Well try not paying tax or not filling in a tax return if they tell you to complete one and you will see how null and void they are.
I live in Ireland and stopped filing my tax returns about 8 years ago which obviously generated some correspondence between me and revenue, eventually about six years ago I received a letter from the revenue solicitors warning me in no uncertain terms that if I failed to file the by then the 3 years returns within three weeks I would be prosecuted.
i spent the following two weeks to draft a response six pages in all, each paragraph posing difficult questions.on the spur of the moment as I wrote out the final draft I added a final paragraph
out of compassion for the solicitor dealing with me I said to make it easy on them I would file all my returns if I received a written order commanding me to do so.
so instead of having to respond to my lengthy and awkward questions a simple written order was all that was required. It was a gamble on my part as I hadn’t done that before with the other government departments I had written to when I failed to comply with their so called laws, but it worked I have not heard from them since
the is a maxim of law that states an unchallenged presumption is regarded as fact . It is one of the principle pillars of the legal system. The state operates on presumptions and if you don’t challenge them they have force , if you educate yourself and do challenge them they scurry away like the filthy cockroaches they are
“ALL Councils on a local and county level. Dissolved. Null and void.” – do you pay council tax?
A precedence was recently set in a court of Law stating that nobody was obliged to pay council tax as there is no obligation to do so. In other words, there is no contract.
However, councils are still allowed to harass in an attempt to get unwitting fools to pay it.
Are you an unwitting fool?
I’m sick of hearing back and forth rants. I agree that this is devaluing this and other important articles.
Facts are not rants. ALL Corporations Chartered since the reign of Queen Anne have been dissolved for fraud. UK Parliament, a Corporation, has been dissolved. People are watching nothing more than theatrics.
I said the same to John, see my post that begins – “This article is about a serious subject worthy of sensible debate and you have to pollute it by going off-topic with your crazed rantings.”
However, it is very easy to skip past and ignore posts that you don’t like. I suggest you do that then you won’t feel sick.
Again – avoidance, won’t give a straight answer. do you pay council tax? In the event of another non-answer, I will take it that you do but dare not admit it.
Also, more name calling even after Rhoda’s mild rebuke and plea for civility.
This article is about a serious subject worthy of sensible debate and you have to pollute it by going off-topic with your crazed rantings. Do the decent thing and walk the streets with a placard or sandwich boards to project your message and see how many recruits to your campaign you get.
Not only does John have nothing to say about excess deaths \ Andrew Bridgen’s speech, but he is a hypocrite.
I asked if he pays council tax – he tell us “A precedence was recently set in a court of Law stating that nobody was obliged to pay council tax as there is no obligation to do so”
That is not a yes or no. He won’t say, so I presume that in spite of all of his rantings, he does pay it.
Earlier today I had asked if he pays tax. I see that since I last looked at this article he has posted a reply and it is more avoidance with a non-answer – “Not in the system. Haven’t been since 2019”. That is not a yes or a no. What does “Not in the system” mean? If he is a UK citizen, then he is in the system until he dies – we all are.
He keeps on calling me an imbecile and a fool – well I am clever enough to see through his games – sneaky tactics to avoid giving a straight answer to a simple question.
I presume that in spite of all of his rantings, he does pay it – bu he won’t admit it. Don’t expect an honest answer from John.
A conversation between John and his friend, just a bit of light chit chat –
Friend – Do you think it will rain today?
John – Rain comes from clouds.
Friend – I know it does, but do you think it will rain today?
John – Rain makes the pavement wet.
Friend – I know it does, but do you think it will rain today?
John – Can’t you understand? You are an un-educated imbecile and fool.
Regarding Maria Caulfield giving that figure of 93.6% – it got me wondering if the Covid-19 Inquiry accepted that figure as being true.
So Maria Caulfield gives a figure of 93.6% – see this – a table of data about excess deaths and it says that 79.7% of the UK had at least one shot of the vaxx.
Dr. John Campbell interviews Dr. David Grimes, consultant physician, who gives a lot of information – the immune system and vitamin D, why older people need to take it, Midazolam, what Whitty said about the lack of statins being the cause of the excess heart deaths and lots more. I found it a bit slow where they go into some of the data in depth, but overall, I found it a very worthwhile interview.
“The second pandemic” – Dr. John Campbell.
At 53m 56s – a table of data about excess deaths and it says that 79.7% of the UK had at least one shot of the vaxx.
Me sorprende la lentitud con que están reaccionando las autoridades médicas y políticas de todo el mundo ante todo lo sucedido con las ARMAS BIOLÓGICAS de Kill Gates y sus Farma-Mafias.
Lo advirtió Luc Montagnier con sobra de datos de investigación genética y abundantes exposiciones públicas diciendo claramente que es un GENOCIDIO el que se programó desde la OMS y el Foro Económico Mundial de Klaus Schwab.
Luc Montagnier fue asesinado por decir que ésta Arma Biológica tenía partes de otros virus como el SIDA y que fueron introducidos por Ganancia de Función en un laboratorio de China.
La Declaración de Great Barrington en el 2020, elaborado por 6000 profesionales de la salud, por igual logró exponer de manera contundente las pésimas e inútiles medidas sanitarias que resultarían los encierros masivos, el distanciamiento social, las mascarillas, las falsas Pruebas PCR, y los carnets de vacunación.
Peter Maccullough por igual expuso de manera abundante los peligrosas que resultan vacunas experimentales genéticas si él y su equipo médicos habían logrado cinco tratamientos clínicos con medicamentos de farmacia y alternativos que tenían un 90% de efectividad, mientas que las vacunas experimentales estaban produciendo graves EFECTOS SECUNDARIOS.
Se sabía ya para comienzos del 2023 que la IVERMECTINA tenía un 95% de efectividad, junto a otros medicamentos como el Ibuprofeno, nitazoxanida, hidroxicloroquina, que ayudaban a curar sin riesgo de daños por Efectos Secundarios.
La comunidad médica nunca supo qué estaba pasando ni han visualizado aún el grave panorama de la inmensa cantidad de enfermos y muertes que se están produciendo a nivel mundial. No ven más allá de sus narices ni porque la evidencia de los hechos es contundente. Siguen siendo BORREGOS de las Farmacéuticas Mafiosas como PFIZER que venden cualquier porquería con la complicidad de la FDA y los CDC americanos.
La cantidad de muertes a nivel mundial después de la vacunación para el SARS-CoV-2 a aumentado 5 veces más con enfermedades que antes eran manejables pero que ahora te matan en poco tiempo como el CÁNCER que ahora produce cuadros graves y fulminantes como es ya el TURBO CÁNCER.
La clase medica queda debiendo muchísimo a la humanidad con su trabajo. No tienen un criterio propio de salud sino uno que les imponen; Ellos no quieren estudiar los datos, síntomas y posibilidades de enfrentar las enfermedades, sino lo que les impongan los Colegios de Médicos, las Farmacéuticas y la OMS.
Thank you for the article, how does Maria Caulfield sleep at night?
The almost 650 MP’s who walked out when the brave Mr Bridgen raised the issue, have all been bought by globalist money. They no doubt go home & gloat over their increased riches, but their time will come, even though they are likely inclined to satanism, when they will stand before the Judgment seat of God & hear these words. Mat 25:41 “Then He will also say to those on the left hand, ‘Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels:
Well they have zero standing with the people … do they have a pass on the culled injection? If not they put themselves piggy in the middle for greed.
They will get their come uppance for it.
The longer the truth is covered up, the more shocking the fallout will be.
That’s an interesting point of view and seems plausible, particularly as more people are discovering the truth each day.
“but the 50 to 64 age group has had it worst” … so I dodged a bullet there then.
Right now the biggest thing IMHO is how can a government / NHS who did this ever regain trust. If somebody tried to kill you would you ever trust them again?
Doubt it … and if you did I would call you a fool.
You are right Mark, but sadly I think that most of the public still don’t know about the scamdemic lies. They believe what is on the MSM news. I haven’t heard a word about the excess deaths debate (either of them) on the BBC new – Radio Four that is. I don’t watch television so I don’t know about that, but I doubt that it has been mentioned there either. A side note – no mention of the excess deaths debates from the BBC, but in December 2022, they were very keen to report Andrew Bridgen’s call for an investigation into excess deaths, but only to carry out character assassination and call him an anti-vaxxer even though he took the vaxx – it was not honest reporting.
Last week there was a news item about the NHS being criticised for not having enough Ivermectin in stock. It is now needed to fight the current scabies plague. So after all they said about it being a horse worming drug that is not safe for humans and anyone who suggested taking it is a mad conspiracy theorist, they now admit that is a safe and useful medicine. The article I read was very carefully phrased to avoid giving clues to the sheeple that they had been lied to. I might be wrong here, but I would guess that if you were to mention Ivermectin, the majority of people would give you a blank stare. Hopefully, I am wrong and the great awakening is in progress.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msE2cUAE2X8&t=1s SHARE
[…] Včera britský parlament znovu projednával trend nadměrného počtu úmrtí. Navazuje na rozpravu o odročení, která se konala dne 20. října 2023. […]
I think Jab-Covid is a one-two punch. Jab weakens heart, then covid makes it worse. A colleague died 2 years after jab, after he finally caught covid. Another colleague tried in vain to revive him after his collapse.
Covid is microwave radiation, if he was jabbed he got graphene oxide and nanotech in his body, when it gets boosted it ruins everything around it, causing mass inflammation (of the ruined, dead cells).
It never was a virus, just how flu is not a virus caused illness but the result of playing (changing) the natural EMF fields and seasonal depoisoning.
You won’t find any book written 300 years ago or earlier about flu pandemics or epidemics because they didn’t exist / were extremely rare. Flu is with us regularly since the mass implementation of electricity. Then every new invention when were globally used started big ‘flu’ pandemics, including telegram, radio, radar, satellites, Gs. Flu is e-smog poisoning or rather de-poisoning, that’s why covid and flu are so similar, what they call covid is flu on steroids.
Part of the story that herbicides, pesticides and ‘common smog’ also can and do cause flu like symptoms.
https://www.5gexposed.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/English-Summary-of-The-Invisible-Rainbow-A-History-of-Electricity-and-Life-3.pdf
The time for debating has passed – let the accusing, firing, imprisoning and hanging begin.
hi folks believe it or not there something far more serious on the horizon…namely the who pandemic treaty READ IT…..theres a petition on the uk on the uk parliament petition page..end the uks membership of the world health of the world health organisation it currently has 73,944 signatures it needs a minimum of 100000 for it to be debated in parliament…do consider signing it and resharing it widely all over the uk with as many like minded people and groups as you possibly can BUT NOT ON GESTAPO BOOK who are blatantly shadow banning and suppressing it so much so that it doesnt have anywhere near the amount of signatures that it should have..consider this if as many believe petitions are a waste of time and achieve nothing then why would gestapo book even bother
This Rwanda rubbish – the MPs backed it. Consider the timing. Could it all have been an act, a stunt, timed to dominate the news and keep the excess deaths debate out of the news?
If you you think I am too suspicious and seeing plots where there is none, a word of advice, never under-estimate how scheming and devious these wharf rats are.
“Those who choose not to acknowledge these cold, hard facts are either unaware of the evidence, wilfully blind or lacking in conscience,”
They are aware of the facts but they are corrupted souls and know the agenda.
Your government wants you dead.
[…] Source […]
[…] POR RHODA WILSON EM 17 DE JANEIRO DE 2024 […]
You people aren’t getting this fast enough, it is called replacement population!!!
I wish Bridgen could run for PM in the UK as an independent, without requiring a party majority in parliament, as RFK Jr can here in the US. He is a shining example of the sort of representation people all over the planet need now, more than ever.
[…] days later, Mr. Bridgen mentioned the Covid Inquiry’s decision during a debate saying he felt Module 4 had been delayed as “political pressure has been placed on the inquiry” […]
[…] zile mai târziu, domnul Bridgen a menționat decizia anchetei Covid în timpul unei dezbateri spunând că simte că Modulul 4 a fost amânat, deoarece „s-a făcut presiune politică asupra […]
[…] jours plus tard, M. Bridgen a évoqué la décision de l’enquête Covid lors d’un débat , affirmant qu’il estimait que le module 4 avait été retardé car « une pression […]
[…] days later, Mr. Bridgen mentioned the Covid Inquiry’s decision during a debate, saying he felt Module 4 had been delayed as “political pressure has been placed on the […]
[…] days later, Mr. Bridgen mentioned the Covid Inquiry’s decision during a debate saying he felt Module 4 had been delayed as “political pressure has been placed on the inquiry” […]
[…] dias depois, Bridgen mencionou a decisão do Inquérito Covid durante um debate, dizendo que sentia que o Módulo 4 tinha sido adiado porque “foi colocada pressão política […]
[…] days later, Mr. Bridgen mentioned the Covid Inquiry’s decision during a debate, saying he felt Module 4 had been delayed as “political pressure has been placed on the […]