|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
In a paper published on Wednesday, researchers re-analysed the Pfizer covid “vaccine” phase 3 trial data and found more serious adverse events among those in the vaccine group.
This is not what published reports from Pfizer’s phase 3 trials said. “Many key trial findings were either misreported or omitted entirely from published reports,” the researchers said.
Seven researchers – M. Nathaniel Mead, Stephanie Seneff, Russ Wolfinger, Jessica Rose, Kris Denhaerynck, Steve Kirsch and Peter A. McCullough – set out to re-analyse Pfizer’s trial data because:
- our understanding of covid vaccinations and their impact on health and mortality has evolved substantially since the first vaccine rollouts; and,
- problems with the methods, execution, and reporting of the pivotal phase 3 trials have emerged.
On Wednesday, they published their findings in a peer-reviewed paper titled ‘Covid-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign’. The paper was published in Cureus, a journal of medical science.
“Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically significant increases in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the vaccine group,” the researchers wrote.
Adding, “Numerous SAEs were identified following the Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA), including death, cancer, cardiac events, and various autoimmune, haematological, reproductive, and neurological disorders.”
The EUA the researchers are referring to is the authorisation granted to Pfizer by the US Food and Drugs Administration (“FDA”).
As the paper noted, Pfizer’s covid “vaccines” never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing according to previously established scientific standards. It goes on to detail the absolute risk reduction, the underreporting of harms during trials, the shifting narratives and illusions of protection, quality control and manufacturing process-related impurities, the biological mechanisms underlying adverse events (“AEs”) and why, based on how our immune systems work, the vaccine is ineffective.
Concluding their comprehensive review, the researchers wrote:
Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.
Mead M, Seneff S, Wolfinger R, et al. (January 24, 2024) COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign. Cureus 16(1): e52876. doi:10.7759/cureus.52876
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
The paper noted that the gene therapy products (“GTPs”) vaccine platform has been studied for over 30 years as an experimental cancer treatment, with the terms “gene therapy” and “mRNA vaccination” often used interchangeably.
“Although we employ the terms ‘vaccine’ and ‘vaccination’ throughout this paper, the covid-19 mRNA products are also accurately termed gene therapy products (GTPs) because, in essence, this was a case of GTP technology being applied to vaccination,” they wrote.
As such, throughout their analysis, the terms “vaccines” and “vaccinations” are used interchangeably with injections, inoculations, biologicals, or simply, products.
The following are some excerpts from the paper. You can read the full paper HERE.
Serious Harms Revealed after EUA was Granted
In this narrative review, we revisit the registrational trials and review analyses of the AEs from these trials and other relevant studies. Most of the revelations have only recently come to light, due to the past few years of extensive censorship of healthcare professionals and research scientists who challenged the prevailing narrative set forth by the vaccine enterprise.
Despite the rhetoric, no large randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trials have ever demonstrated reductions in SARS-CoV-2 transmission, hospitalisation or death.
The study designs for the pivotal trials that led to the EUA were never intended to determine whether the mRNA inoculations could help prevent severe disease or premature death.
It was only after the EUA that the serious biological consequences of rushing the trials became evident, with numerous cardiovascular, neurological, reproductive, haematological, malignant, and autoimmune SAEs identified and published in the peer-reviewed medical literature.
Moreover, the covid mRNA vaccines produced via Process 1 and evaluated in the trials were not the same products eventually distributed worldwide; all of the covid-19 mRNA products released to the public were produced via Process 2 and have been shown to have varying degrees of DNA contamination.
The process-related impurities were absent from the covid-19 mRNA products used in the registrational trials. Virtually all doses used in those trials originated from “clinical batches” produced using what is known as Process 1. As a post-authorisation emergency supply measure for global distribution, however, a method much more suitable for mass production known as Process 2 was devised utilising bacterial plasmid DNA.
The failure of regulatory authorities to heretofore disclose process-related impurities (e.g., SV40) has further increased concerns regarding safety and quality control oversight of mRNA vaccine manufacturing processes.
Incentives Played a Key Role in Undermining Scientific Evaluation
Political and financial incentives may have played a key role in undermining the scientific evaluation process leading up to the EUA.
Before the pandemic, the US National Institutes of Health invested $116 million (35%) in mRNA vaccine technology, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (“BARDA”) had invested $148 million (44%), while the Department of Defence (“DOD”) contributed $72 million (21%) to mRNA vaccine development.
BARDA and the DOD also collaborated closely in the co-development of Moderna’s mRNA vaccine, dedicating over $18 billion, which included guaranteed vaccine purchases. This entailed pre-purchasing hundreds of millions of mRNA vaccine doses, alongside direct financial support for the clinical trials and the expansion of Moderna’s manufacturing capabilities.
Once the pandemic began, $29.2 billion – 92% of which came from US public funds – was dedicated to the purchase of covid-19 mRNA products; another $2.2 billion (7%) was channelled into supporting clinical trials, and $108 million (less than 1%) was allocated for manufacturing and basic research.
Using US taxpayer money to purchase so many doses in advance would suggest that, before the EUA process, US federal agencies were strongly biased toward successful outcomes for the registrational trials.
Established Vaccine Testing Period Abolished
Before the rapid authorisation process, no vaccine had been permitted for market release without undergoing a testing period of at least four years. Previous timeframes for phase 3 trial testing averaged 10 years. Health departments have stated that 10-15 years is the normal timeframe for evaluating vaccine safety.
The previously established 10-15-year timeframe for clinical evaluation of vaccines was deemed necessary to ensure adequate time for monitoring the development of AEs such as cancers and autoimmune disorders.
Pfizer’s covid vaccine completed the process in seven months.
Established Safety Standards Abolished
With the covid vaccines, safety was never assessed in a manner commensurate with previously established scientific standards, as numerous safety testing and toxicology protocols typically followed by the FDA were sidestepped.
Historical accounts bear witness to instances where vaccines were prematurely introduced to the market under immense pressure, only to reveal disabling or even fatal AEs later on. Examples include the 1955 contamination of polio vaccines, instances of Guillain-Barré syndrome observed in flu vaccine recipients in 1976, and the connection between narcolepsy and a specific flu vaccine in 2009.
Against this backdrop, it is not surprising that so many medical and public health experts voiced concerns about covid mRNA vaccines bypassing the normal safety testing process.
Concerns about inadequate safety testing extend beyond the usual regulatory approval standards and practices.
As there were no specific regulations at the time of the rapid approval process, regulatory agencies quickly “adapted” the products, generalised the definition of “vaccine” to accommodate them, and then authorised them for EUA for the first time ever against a viral disease.
Due to the GTPs’ reclassification as vaccines, none of their components have been thoroughly evaluated for safety. The main concern, in a nutshell, is that the covid mRNA products may transform body cells into viral protein factories that have no off-switch – i.e., no built-in mechanism to stop or regulate such proliferation – with the spike protein (“S-protein”) being generated for prolonged periods, causing chronic, systemic inflammation and immune dysfunction.
When the S-protein enters the bloodstream and disseminates systemically, it may become a contributing factor to diverse AEs in susceptible people.
Enforce a Global Moratorium
Given the well-documented SAEs and unacceptable harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse and enforce a global moratorium on these modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
Latest news: The Inventor of Lipid Nanoparticles Knew the mRNA Wouldn’t Stay in Your Arm
And the co-founder of BioNTech didn’t want it to stay there anyway.
NE – nakedemperor.substack.com Jan 25
Remember when you were told not to worry because this new mRNA vaccine would stay in your arm? You were patronisingly told that after being injected into your muscle, the mRNA would instruct the muscle cells to start growing the spike protein, you would have an immune response, you wouldn’t infect anybody…ever, you would be a hero, you wouldn’t die…of anything and it would stop there. Nothing to worry about.
Well we all knew that wasn’t true, it was obvious from the side effects people were having. But was this misinformation deliberate or just a result of trying to rush out a product too quickly?
It turns out that not only was it deliberate misinformation, it was an out and out lie. Not only was it known that the mRNA wouldn’t stay in the arm, they actually wanted it to go around your body. Clearly, we were all told the ‘stay in your arm’ lie to reduce vaccine hesitancy and increase big pharma profits.
Last year we learnt that BioNTech, the company that developed the mRNA vaccine with Pfizer, wanted the mRNA to travel around the body to the lymph nodes.
Virginie Joron, a French MP, tweeted a picture from a presentation she was attending. The speaker was Özlem Türeci, co-founder of BioNTech and her slide was called ‘The Bodyhack – Bringing mRNA to the right cells at the right places’.
The image clearly shows that the cells BioNTech were targeting were dendritic cells in the lymph nodes. Robert Kogon reported that “A passage from The Vaccine, the book that Türeci and her husband, BioNTech CEO Ugur Sahin, wrote with journalist Joe Miller, explains why BioNTech’s platform specifically targets the lymph nodes:
What Ugur learnt was that the location to which a vaccine delivers its ‘wanted poster’ really mattered. The reason for this, the couple’s team in Mainz later realised, was that not all dendritic cells … were created equal. The ones that resided in lymph nodes – of which the spleen is the largest – were particularly adept at capturing mRNA and making sure the instructions it carried were acted upon. These kidney-bean shaped organs, found under our armpits, in our groins, and at several other outposts in the body, are the information hubs of the immune system. (p. 98)
Indeed, Sahin and Türeci were so determined to get their mRNA into the lymph nodes that they had an earlier mRNA construct injected directly into the patient’s lymph nodes in the groin (p. 104).
Needless to say, such an approach was not likely to obtain wide acceptance as a vaccine! This is why the couple, as explained in their book, needed to package the mRNA in lipid nanoparticles, in order to ensure that mRNA administered by way of an intramuscular injection would, nonetheless, be widely distributed around the body and thus reach the lymph nodes.”
So we know from this information that BioNTech wanted the mRNA to travel around the body but perhaps they kept this a secret and everybody else thought that it really would ‘stay in the arm’.
Nope.
In October 2022, Dr. Pietr Cullis presented a lecture at the University of Manitoba for the Annual Gairdner Lecture – Science and Serendipity: Lipid Nanoparticles that Enable COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines.
Dr. Cullis is widely credited with inventing the Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) delivery system that ensures the mRNA doesn’t degrade before it reaches your cells. Without the LNPs, the mRNA would get destroyed long before it got anywhere near a cell and so is critical for the vaccines to ‘work’.
Cullis is also the founder of Acuitas Therapeutics who develop LNPs and whose technology is used in Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine.
In his lecture he is asked if his LNP delivery system is able to target specific tissues or restrict which tissues it stays in. Dr. Cullis says “That’s going to be tricky. People have been trying to target these lipids, or any nanomedicine, without any success over 40 years of trying…I’ve worn out 5 graduate students on that project. The last one refused to go on unless I changed her project”.
They’ve known for over 40 years that the LNPs wouldn’t stay in your arm. In fact, they didn’t ever want them to. They wanted the ‘vaccine’ to travel all round your body so that some of it would find its way to your lymph nodes. There, the dendritic cells were more likely to translate the mRNA as intended.
But they kept this quiet from you because would you really go and get injected if you were told that this new technology would travel all round your body where it would be taken up by all types of cells, including spleen, liver and ovary cells, which would then be instructed to produce a spike protein created in a lab somewhere, causing who knows what side effects because the trials were cancelled early because it just wasn’t fair that the placebo group hadn’t been given mRNA.
The Naked Emperor
Me: “be instructed to produce a spike protein created in a lab somewhere” – not mRNA but ModRNA = laboratory made.
Would you have gone and got ModRNA injected if you knew that: ARR 1.3% efficient for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, ARR 1.2% for the Moderna–NIH, ARR 1.2% for the J&J, ARR 0.93% for the Gamaleya, and ARR 0.84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines.
Dr. Piero Olliaro of Oxford University led the team that produced the new Lancet report: . https://wwhttps://christine257.substack.com/p/13-for-the-astrazenecaoxford-12-for-da5w.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext#%20
ARR vs RRR – ARR = Actual RRR= Theoretical.
For: Moderna’s Covid-19 virus #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG Patented 2013.
Pfizer/BionTech ARR 0.84% Effective.
Moderna’s Covid-19 virus #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG ARR 99.16% Effective and injected into you as a vaccine which travels all round your body where it would be taken up by all types of cells, including spleen, liver and ovary cells – Confidential Pfizer document shows the company observed 1.6 million adverse events covering nearly every organ system by Daniel Horowitz and Over 10,000 categories of nearly 1.6 million adverse events – many of them serious and debilitating – brought to you by Pfizer!
https://christine257.substack.com/p/confidential-pfizer-document-shows-a3f
Former 60 Minutes correspondent Lara Logan drops a bombshell on VSRF
Lara knows 20 people who died from the COVID vaccine but only 1 who died from the COVID virus. This means the vaccines, more likely than not, killed at least 5X as many people as the virus.
Former 60 Minutes correspondent Lara Logan knows only one person who died from COVID, but 20 who died from the vaccine.
Assuming the vaccine and COVID killed equal numbers of people, the probability that Lara could observe 20 vaccine deaths vs. 1 COVID death is 1.6e-19.
In other words, it cannot happen by “bad luck” that you get those sorts of statistics if the vaccine killed a comparable number of people as the virus/hospitalization protocols.
The vaccine killed at least 5X as many people as the virus
Steve Kirsch Jan 26
Frankly from what I have learned no vaccine can ever be safe unless it is tailored to the individual DNA of a person to prevent adverse events or death.
They got away with it playing the % risk game and hiding data so the true risk would never be known. Well that cat is out of the bag.
I see no reason to take anymore vaxxes now I am 60 especially when the current ones do not stop infection and transmission. They had an argument if they had worked but the mRNA type is just too leaky.
These are bio-weapons! Arrest Fauci and everyone involved
Hi Brad,
Well said.
Slight problem, looks like the American military paid for all the development and C19 production.
Seems strange, but true.
https://tapnewswire.com/2024/01/confirmed-bio-weapon-injections-us-supreme-court-ruling/
This is the result of the financial/corporate capture of all public institutions, especially govt and its multitude of departments. All this countering against many nasty and or poisonous substances by credentialed science is moot in the face of “capture.” The people do not realize they are on their own and likely won’t until it is too damn late to begin setting up completely new societal structures via non violent revolution.
[…] WILSON ON JANUARY 26, 2024 • ( 4 […]
[…] Researchers urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on mRNA injections in a newly released s… […]
In one of his interviews with Dr. John Campbell, Prof. Angus Dalgleish said that for five years, he was on the board of a company that focused purely on mRNA vaccines and he learned then of the problems with them. He said they should not be used. That is from one of the UK’s top oncologists and medical researchers who’s research studies have included virology.
“FDA Quietly Finalizes Rule That Removes Informed Consent From Clinical Trials”
https://en-volve.com/2024/01/26/fda-quietly-finalizes-rule-that-removes-informed-consent-from-clinical-trials/
[…] Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Regional Trials and Global Vaccine Campaign” as reported by The Expose. The seven researchers, consisting of M. Nathaniel Mead, Stephanie Seneff, Russ Wolfinger, Jessica […]
[…] Read More […]
[…] Articol original: https://expose-news.com/2024/01/26/researchers-urge-a-global-moratorium-on-mrna/ […]
https://tapnewswire.com/2024/01/confirmed-bio-weapon-injections-us-supreme-court-ruling/
There is NO mRNA in the Ai/Bioweapon Injections…It’s all hard metals aligning with electronics, Graphene which self assembles according to the Quantum Dots located within the Nanolipids.
THEY ARE SEEKING TO ENSLAVE HUMANITY BY UNITING BIOLOGY WITH MACHINES CONSTANTLY SURVEILLED VIA FREQUENCIES ASSOCIATED WITH 5G or any higher modulations.
Am done reading anything by people covering the truth in a maldirected measure to maintain order by hiding the truth.
[…] to endorse a global moratorium on mRNA injections in a newly released science paper” (see link: https://expose-news.com/2024/01/26/researchers-urge-a-global-moratorium-on-mrna/ ). From the article: “Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically […]
Information has been out in the public AND IN EXPOSE FOR TWO YEARS AND I KNOW BECAUSE I LEFT LINKS TO THOSE PROVIDING THE INFORMATION.
This is Corporate Media as all the rest…Appearing to be opposition telling the truth exactly as the Frontline Doctors now pretending to do RESEARCH THEY’VE ALREADY DONE AND HAVE KNOWN OF FROM OTHER PEOPLE FOR YEARS.
EUA/OTA Countermeasures are OWNED by the U.K.’s “His Majesty’s Armed Forces and U.S. DOD. These poisons are U.K.’s NHS and U.S.’s HHS-CDC-FDA camouflaged with the term ‘Vaccines’ for marketing purposes to get them in all humans and animals to DESTROY DNA and provide constant surveillance for the POWER/CONTROL FREAKS of every living being on Earth.
These Injections are AI/BIOWEAPONS AS BOTH INJECTIONS AND AEROSOLS SPRAYED FROM PLANES WHICH IS TO GEO-ENGINEER THEM INTO THE ENVIRONMENT TO INFEST AND POISON ALL LIFE ON THE PLANET.
They have NO mRNA…
THEY DO HAVE NANOLIPIDS WHICH CONTAIN QUANTUM DOTS, HEAVY METALS, GRAPHENE OXIDE TO SELF CONSTRUCT ELECTRONICS WITHIN THE HUMAN BODY ACTIVATED WITH 5G FREQUENCIES AND ALL OTHER FREQUENCIES AS WELL. The Frontline Doctors have COVERED-UP THIS INFORMATION FOR THEIR OWN PURPOSES.
The only known treatment is constant detox with Calcium Disodium EDTA Chelation used alternately (NOT THE SAME TIME) with Mega-Dose Vit. C, Methalyne Blue Dye on empty stomach BID or Sodium Citrate is under investigation used with food at 500mg BID. Also NAC, Vit. D, and other Supplements to strengthen the Immune System and protect the Cardiovascular and Neurological Systems are great.
TELL THE PEOPLE THE WHOLE TRUTH AS THEY DESERVE TO KNOW HOW TO HELP THEMSELVES.
Anybody seeking more information may find more in this Substack with Dr. Ana Mihalcea’s work published almost dailty.
“Control of Mind Using Nanotechnology” – 2020 Scientific Paper Explains Complete Thought and Brain Control through Nanotechnology