Breaking News

UK’s “Online Safety Act” OFFICIALLY Grants MSM Permission to Publish Lies.

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Please share our story!

Welcome to the UK where it’s now official government policy that you CAN’T publish “misinformation”, but The Guardian, the BBC, Disney and Netflix CAN, say Off Guardian. As we reported in September 2023, the Bill is a piece of legislation that comes under the guise of being predominantly for the safety of children in an attempt to protect them from online grooming and abuse and also to limit the reach of terrorist propaganda.

This is the use of a propaganda technique known as “card-stacking.” The government has presented something everyone can agree upon, for example, child abuse is evil and children need protecting, to induce people, including our representatives in Parliament, to believe that the legislation is necessary. Source

This is not the real objective of the bill, this is simply a tactic used to deter people from fighting against the bill which really has the primary focus of narrative control.

The bill is essentially, a direct attack on social media platforms, or more specifically the content that can be seen and shared on them and will enable the government to blackmail social media companies to reduce their reach, de-platform, and criminalise views that disagree with the government narrative. Read More

The Expose reported the parallels with Orwell’s dystopian 1984 and also the danger to our freedom of speech which has already been steadily eroding. Source

Off Guardian further this and say that the

“UK’s “Online Safety Act” OFFICIALLY Grants MSM Permission to Publish Lies.”

Originally published in Off Guardian

Yes, it’s true – the recently signed “Online Safety Act” brands the publication of “false information” a criminal offense punishable by up to a year in prison……unless you’re an MSM outlet, when it’s totally fine.

Think even the corrupt & bloated criminal class that rules over us would never dare be that blatant?

Take a look at section 179 making it illegal to publish false information with intent to cause harm:

…and then look at section 180, which exempts all MSM outlets from this new law :

…and that’s without even getting into OfCom’s “select committee”, or how they choose to define “misinformation” (s. 152)

Welcome to the modern definition of “freedom of speech”, where the MSM are directly and explicitly permitted to “knowingly publish false information with intent to cause non-trivial harm”, and you can be sent to jail for a year for calling out their lies.

Oh, and it looks like our friends across the pond might not be far behind. The Big Tech Senate hearings started yesterday, and social media executives are already throwing their support behind the new “Kids Online Safety Act”.

With the EU’s own Digital Services Act coming into force later this month, and all the focus on “misinformation and disinformation” at Davos two weeks ago, we can see the real crackdown on internet free speech is about to kick into gear.

Good times.

For a more in-depth break down of what exactly the “Online Safety Act” is and how it works, you can read our article from last September.

Republished below.

UK quietly passes “Online Safety Bill” into law

by Kit Knightly.

Buried behind the Brand-related headlines yesterday, the British House of Lords voted to pass the controversial “Online Safety Bill” into law. All that’s needed now is Royal assent, which Charles will obviously provide.

The bill’s (very catchy) long-form title is…

A Bill to make provision for and in connection with the regulation by OFCOM of certain internet services; for and in connection with communications offences; and for connected purposes.

…and that’s essentially it, it hands the duty of “regulating” certain online content to the UK’s Office of Communications (OfCom).

Ofcom Chief Executive Dame Melanie Dawes could barely contain her excitement in a statement to the press:

“Today is a major milestone in the mission to create a safer life online for children and adults in the UK. Everyone at Ofcom feels privileged to be entrusted with this important role, and we’re ready to start implementing these new laws.”

As always with these things, the bill’s text is a challenging and rather dull read, deliberately obscure in its language and difficult to navigate.

Of some note is the “information offenses” clause, which empowers OfCom to demand “information” from users, companies and employees, and makes it a crime to withhold it. The nature of this “information” is never specified, nor does it appear to be qualified. Meaning it could be anything, and will most likely be used to get private account information about users from social media platforms.

In one of the more worrying clauses, the Bill outlines what they call “communications offenses”. Section 10 details crimes of transmitting “Harmful, false and threatening communications”.

It should be noted that sending threats is already illegal in the UK, so the only new ground covered here is “harmful” and/or “false” information, and the fact they feel the need to differentiate between those two things should worry you.

After all, the truth can definitely be “harmful”…Especially to a power-hungry elite barely controlling an angry populace through dishonest propaganda.

Rather amusingly, the bill makes it a crime to “send a message” containing false information in clause 156…then immediately grants immunity to every newspaper, television channel and streaming service in clause 157.

Apparently it’s OK for the mainstream media to be harmful and dishonest.

But the primary purpose of the new law is a transfer of responsibility to enable and incentivize censorship.

Search engines (“regulated search services”, to quote the bill) and social media companies (“regulated user-to-user services”) will now be held accountable for how people use their platform.

For example: If I were to google “Is it safe to drink bleach?”, find some website that says yes, and then drink bleach, OfCom would not hold me responsible. They would hold Google responsible for letting me read that website. Likewise, if someone tweets @ me telling me to drink bleach, and I do so, Twitter would be held responsible for permitting that communication to take place.

This could result in hefty fines, or even potentially criminal charges, to companies and/or executives of those companies. It could even open them up to massively expensive civil suits (don’t be surprised if such a legal drama hits the headlines soon).

Unsurprisingly the mainstream coverage of the new laws barely mentions any of these concerns, instead opting to put child pornography front and centre. Because the Mrs Lovejoy argument always works.

That’s all window dressing, of course, what this is really about is “misinformation” and “hate speech”. Which is to say, fact-checking mainstream lies and calling out mainstream liars.

Section 7(135) is entirely dedicated to the creation of a new “Advisory committee on disinformation and misinformation”, which will be expected to submit regular reports to OfCom and the Secretary of State on how best to “counter misinformation on regulated services“.

This is clearly a response to Covid, or rather the failure of Covid.

Essentially, the pandemic narrative broke because the current mechanisms of censorship didn’t work well enough. In response, the government has just legalised and out-sourced their silencing of dissent.

See, the government isn’t going to actually censor anyone themselves, protecting it from pro-free speech criticism. Rather, huge financial pressure will be applied on tech giants to be “responsible” and “protect the vulnerable”. Meaning de-platforming and cancelling independent media via increasingly opaque “terms of service violations”

These companies will be cheered on by the vast crowd of jabbed-and-masked NPCs who have been so successfully brainwashed into believing the “they are a private company and can do that they want” argument.

This has been going on for years already, of course, but that was covert stuff. Now it’s legal in the UK, and is about to get a lot worse.

It won’t be just the UK either, considering the messaging on “misinformation” being seen at the UN in the last few days, we should expect something similar on a global scale.

You can read the full text of the Online Safety Bill here.

Sources:

The Expose – The Online Safety Bill – Welcome to the New World Order https://expose-news.com/2023/09/23/the-online-safety-bill-welcome-to-the-new-world-order/

The Expose -The Online Safety Bill: A Certainty of Safety or a Descent into Orwellian Dystopia? – https://expose-news.com/2023/10/04/online-safety-bill-certainty-of-safety-or-descent-into-orwellian-dystopia/

– Off Guardian- “UK’s “Online Safety Act” OFFICIALLY grants MSM permission to publish lies” https://off-guardian.org/2024/02/02/uks-online-safety-act-officially-grants-msm-permission-to-publish-lies/

Kit Knightly – Off Guardian – UK quietly passes “Online Safety Bill” into law – https://off-guardian.org/2023/09/20/uk-quietly-passes-online-safety-bill-into-law/

Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.

The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.

Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.

Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Please share our story!
author avatar
Patricia Harrity

Categories: Breaking News

Tagged as:

5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
23 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rich
Rich
1 year ago

sound like the Aussie one:Many of us are wondering what 2024 brings after the deception of the COVID19 years (2020-23) and also the presentation of a Mis- Dis- Information Bill 2023 in parliament that will exempt the Australian government from being liable for providing mis- or dis-information.

Why would the Australian government need a bill that protects itself from providing misinformation? A bill that will prevent freedom of speech and debate on scientific and political issues? It’s not in the public’s interest.

Could it be that the government COVID19 narrative was misinformation or in fact, medical fraud with doctors violating all medical ethics and principles?

Judy Wilyman PhD Jan 14

William
William
1 year ago

This sounds like the law in the USA in the 80s that prevents pharmaceutical companies from being sued when someone was harmed by their ‘medicines’. Since then new vaccines were introduced like never before.

pierre
pierre
1 year ago

time to completely stop payin tv license in the uk and stop paying all taxes that are not automatically deducted from pay, then the people after squeezing these crooks of our funding can take the laws and country back from this bunch of crooks

Mrs D
Mrs D
1 year ago

Personally love black comedy and the horrific stuff going on would make me helpless with laughter, if it wasn’t for real.

“OFFICIALLY Grants MSM Permission to Publish Lies”

They clearly don’t need official permission for what they’ve been doing for decades, it’s all a pathetic attempt to shut us up. It won’t work as the truth is out there now and too many people know about it. The Filth really thought they had us in the early days of their manufactured pandemic, which is why they had the hubris to publish The Great Reset so early on.

Anything can be made legal but lawful is another thing entirely. There are still judges who aren’t bought and paid for, as a couple of recent events in the US have shown. Sadly, our lives can be made hell for speaking truth, however, it’s more likely now the Govt won’t get their way in court.

Mrs D
Mrs D
Reply to  Mrs D
1 year ago

Please delete the comment awaiting approval Patricia, think adding a link at the end might be what caused the problem this time.

Robin
Robin
Reply to  Mrs D
1 year ago

Thank you for the reminder that ‘legal and ‘lawful’ aren’t the same! I’m going to pin this reply to my desktop that I won’t forget that important distinction again so easily!

Mrs D
Mrs D
Reply to  Robin
1 year ago

Thank you for your lovely words. Law trumps legal always, even though we’re encouraged to think otherwise.

Chris C
Chris C
1 year ago

The MSM are guilty of Crimes against Humanity and Crimes against Creation by LYING to the public PROMOTING 6 BILLION DOSES OF A BIOWEAPON to be injected into we Earthlings, plus failing to investigate, debate and inform the masses about the daily chemtrails (and 5G) that are an OMNICIDAL attack on all life.

The corporate Nazi-communist MSM have lost all credibility and they should all be locked up for assisting democide, genocide, War Crimes, treason etc.
All their places of “work” (murder) should be raised to the ground.

Mike
Mike
Reply to  Chris C
1 year ago

6billion? Try three times that.

Mark Deacon
Mark Deacon
1 year ago

UK government lies and the MSM (BBC) publish the lies.

Anybody believing either is a fool.

trackback
1 year ago

[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]

Wrip
Wrip
1 year ago

So, just like Obama legalized propaganda, they came up with a law to sanction what they’ve been doing forever?

Dave Owenhttps://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/for
Dave Owenhttps://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/for
Reply to  Wrip
1 year ago

Hi Wrip,
Pleased you mention the US.
They even pay people, to act out False Flags.
Then the MSM print it all as true.
The School shootings, the bombings, the athletes being shot.
The US government pays for all the extra’s, it’s not cheap entertainment.
The same happens in the UK, all False Flags.

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
1 year ago

If they (MSM) have permission or not it makes no difference to the lies they spew out, as they are never held to account.
The danger in the bill is the arrest and charging of people that are speaking the truth but as its off the government narrative-therefore will be classed as disinformation and legally enforceable.
Dangerous times- Mr Orwell like the conspiracy theorists, right yet again…

Dave Owenhttps://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/for
Dave Owenhttps://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/for
Reply to  Paul Watson
1 year ago

Hi Paul Watson,
What you say is totally true.
Myself, and a group of friends, used to take out 2000 pieces of paper, every Sunday morning, before the Red’s got up.
I myself was investigated 4 times, by Special Branch.
Twice at home and twice at a near location, where they had a helicopter flying over us, having a meeting.
So nothings changed.

Diane Leef
Diane Leef
1 year ago

Obama gave full on permission and immunity to news outlets to spread propaganda in 2008

CharlieSeattle
CharlieSeattle
1 year ago

Irrelevant Deflection by the Brits!!

Would you kindly deep six all your Nukes and destroy your nuke facilities before the grinning Muslims take over your country?

Barry
Barry
1 year ago

Why even try read one article here? On my first visit I am blocked from reading until I donate then I keep getting interrupted by stupid pop ups wailing about money

This is real life . When you provide a worthwhile product I’ll be happy to pay but I can’t even read your articles

Bible Prophecy in Action
Bible Prophecy in Action
1 year ago

“ONE DIGITAL ID TO RULE US ALL” – RACING TOWARDS THE BIBLE PROPHESIED MARK OF THE BEAST”, To read more, pls visit 👇 https://bibleprophecyinaction.blogspot.com/

trackback
8 months ago

[…] UK’s “Online Safety Act” OFFICIALLY Grants MSM Permission to Publish Lies Welcome to the UK, where it’s now official government policy that you CAN’T publish “misinformation,” but The Guardian, the BBC, Disney, and Netflix CAN, say Off Guardian. As we reported in September 2023, the Bill is a piece of legislation that comes under the guise of being predominantly for the safety of children in an attempt to protect them from online grooming and abuse and also to limit the reach of terrorist propaganda. […]