Breaking News

HUGE: Could The WHO be BACKING DOWN on the Pandemic Treaty?

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Pandemic treaty is still in the process of being drafted, however, the most recent draft may suggest that the World Health Organisation (WHO) is “backing down” as the most draconian articles within the treaty have been removed, according to Peter Imanuelsen. ‘This is a major victory for freedom.’ he says.

The WHO intends to use the idea of “One Health” to subsume all living beings under its own “authority.’ It is essentially a trojan horse for a global power grab. If successful, the treaty will give the WHO the authority to announce a “pandemic” any time they like which will enable the justification to enforce any “medical” programme it deems necessary under the guise of “world health,” regardless of their efficacy and side-effects, which includes death.

The Who’s notion of “pandemic preparedness’ aims to vindicate censorship of the people and to transfer the Sovereignty regarding “public health ‘decision making globally to the Director-General of the WHO which means that legally, member countries would lose their sovereignty. Together with the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the United Nations (UN), the WHO will have the ultimate control, a totalitarian governance.

‘But now there is good news – They are BACKING DOWN!’ according to Peter Imanuelsen who explains in the article below that the most draconian articles within the treaty have been removed. If this is true, then this is major new.

HUGE: ‘The WHO is BACKING DOWN on the Pandemic Treaty.’

Originally published on Substack Peter Sweden.

Feature picture – Flag of the WHO in Geneva / Photo credit Peter Imanuelsen

In the latest draft of the WHO pandemic treaty, they appear to be BACKING DOWN, removing some of the most draconian rules. This doesn’t mean that everything is all good, but this is definitely a good start and a massive victory for freedom.

First of all, they are making the treaty non-binding. This means that countries will keep their national sovereignty instead of having to hand it over to a bunch of unelected elites at the WHO.

The big issue was Article 13A in the pandemic treaty. It was originally proposed to say the following:

“1. States Parties recognize WHO as the guidance and coordinating authority of international public health response during public health Emergency of International Concern and undertake to follow WHO’s recommendations in their international public health response.”

This text would have meant that countries would be forced to follow the rules and recommendations as decided by the unelected elites at the WHO.

But this entire article has in fact now been REMOVED from the latest draft of the pandemic treaty, meaning that countries do no longer have to obey the WHO. This is a massive win for national sovereignty.

https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr8/WGIHR8_Proposed_Bureau_text-en.pdf

Last year I held a speech outside the UN headquarters in Geneva in protest of the pandemic treaty. I warned about how this was all connected to the Agenda 2030, you can see my article on that here.

And this is very good news!

Because when you look at Article 18 in the pandemic treaty and see what kind of recommendations the WHO could come up with, things get pretty scary.

For example, they can recommend the following.

  • require medical examinations;
  • review proof of vaccination or other prophylaxis;
  • require vaccination or other prophylaxis;
  • implement quarantine or other health measures for suspect persons;
  • implement isolation and treatment where necessary of affected persons;
  • implement tracing of contacts of suspect or affected persons;

This recommendations means in reality that countries could have been required to vaccinate people, implement vaccine passports and put people in quarantine if the WHO said so.

Because Article 13A.1 has been removed, it seems that these recommendations are no longer binding. They are still there, but countries aren’t bound to have to follow them.

But it gets even better!

They have also DROPPED the proposal to setup global censorship of things that the WHO deems to be “misinformation”. We all know that this would have been used to infringe in free speech, so it is massive news that this has been dropped.

In a New Article 7, it was proposed that “At the Global level, WHO shall strengthen capacities to…(e) counter misinformation and disinformation”.

This proposal is not in the current draft, which is good news. We all know that this would have been used to censor anyone that went against their agenda.

Keep in mind that this is still only a draft, and things can change before they have their final negotiations.

This news comes shortly after there was a massive protest in Japan against the WHO pandemic treaty. More and more people all over the world are beginning to see what is going on here. So make sure to SHARE this article everywhere you can to raise awareness – Let the people be informed so that they can say no to tyranny!

Source:

Peter Imanuelsen – Peter Sweden

Share this page to Telegram
4.7 6 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
56 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
mcc
mcc
18 days ago

The WHO have indeed come up against a few setbacks. And it’s good to hear some good news for a change.
Don’t want to be a damp squib ! but we still have a big battle ahead.
May I point out a few things that need watching:
There is hope that the Treaty may be shelved,for a time but what about the International Health Regulation Amendments, which I understand contains the real nasties and unlike a Treaty can be slipped through more easily
Various countries are objecting and creating obstructions: but as I understand it , this not (as one might hope) because the whole thing is evil, a power grab ushering in unpredented tyranny: it is because indiviual countries are not getting a big enough share of the pie? Well that’s how I understand James Roguski’s statement on UK Column a month or two back that it was essentially a trade agreement?
Plus above all, didn’t I read that the WHO were thinking of leaving out some real nasties from the treaty, getting countries to sign then slipping the nasties in later. Perhaps using the trick of making the treaty wording vague so that later they can make it mean what they want it to mean.

Chris C
Chris C
Reply to  mcc
18 days ago

Exactly, the W.H.O. etc. word documents so that only lawyers can understand them fully, and remember how over the years they have changed the definitions of words such as “vaccine”, “virus isolation” (yet to happen in Nature), “disinformation” etc.

in reality We The People need to charge the WHO,WEF, UN etc. and puppet politicians with Crimes against Humanity/Creation, omnicide, treason and so on, not just disconnect with them.

Kay
Kay
Reply to  mcc
18 days ago

I read the same thing. And anything they add later will be binding on participants. It’s all pretense, with an unchanged goal.

Jon
Jon
Reply to  mcc
16 days ago

Bingo–no trust.They have forfeited it, along with the vax.

Mrs D
Mrs D
18 days ago

Fantastic article spot and post Patricia, bookmarked Peter’s Substack, some heartening articles there. However, won’t hold my breath either:

“Keep in mind that this is still only a draft, and things can change before they have their final negotiations.”

Yep, likely they will but this is yet another nasty kick in the teeth to the Filth. They thought they’d trained us so well but still can’t place the cherry on top. Diddums.

Mrs D
Mrs D
Reply to  Patricia Harrity
18 days ago

Another repost Patricia, please delete the first one if this works:

Peter’s Substack is a great spot Patricia, several recent articles of his for me to go through. Don’t know if you’ve seen this article:

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/04/20/a-collective-common-enemy-now-stalks-mankind/

Think it does a great breakdown on the mindset of the Filth, they truly are deranged in a disgusting, not pitiful way. Their lives are hell on earth and they want what would remain of us, as fellow prison inmates/slaves.

On a good note, glad to say my subscription went through.

Chris C
Chris C
Reply to  Mrs D
18 days ago

Hi Mrs D.
The mindset of the Filth enjoy drinking the blood of terrified children, and it is their puppets who warned Andrew Bridgen MP about who he is taking on, hence the Chamber almost empty when he speaks the truth, apart from a dozen good souls with a conscience.

We must inform every decent citizen of this Planet what is happening, using every conceivable method.

Dave Owenhttps://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/for
Dave Owenhttps://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/for
Reply to  Chris C
18 days ago
Mrs D
Mrs D
Reply to  Chris C
18 days ago

“We must inform every decent citizen of this Planet what is happening, using every conceivable method.”

Good to see you friend, really good comment and the quote from you i’ve posted above, couldn’t be more true.

Mrs D
Mrs D
Reply to  Chris C
18 days ago

Glory! Two comments of mine posted straight off =)

Mrs D
Mrs D
Reply to  Patricia Harrity
18 days ago

Please don’t post the two comments awaiting approval Patricia, the third one has been published, in odd circumstances.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Mrs D
18 days ago

They’ll get “the cherry on top.” don’t worry about that, Mrs. D!

When, and how, I don’t know, but one thing I do know is that the wiles of the devil (Eph. 6:12) are many, more than we can know.

Regarding ‘progress’ an old time prophecy writer said it right; “A river can flow back on itself many times before reaching its destination.”

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Mrs D
18 days ago

I replied to you Mrs. D, Maybe it’ll show up tomorrow or whenever, WHO knows!?

Mrs D
Mrs D
Reply to  Islander
18 days ago

Another repost Patricia, please delete the first one if this shows up:

Blessings friend, it’s shown up and yep, it isn’t in our power to sort out this mess which has developed over millennia. However, thankfully there’s a big guy who can and will when the time is right.

My spiritual studies are really progressing and have quite a few important questions, to make sure i’m developing the right understanding. Would help if we can chat on a quiet thread if you have the time.

Also thinking of joining a suitable forum online, do you know of a good one?

SAbi8
SAbi8
18 days ago

Draconian or less draconian, we don’t need a World Homicide Organisation to dictate how to cull more people.
They should be hanged, every single one of them.

SAbi8
SAbi8
18 days ago

While this is not the subject (strictly speaking) of this article, I would appreciate if an author here would go after the mRNA LIE or at least would be able to prove that the jabs were mRNA – because they were not.

More comments from me disappeared, were deleted after being published, they were attacking the mRNA-spike protein-SV40 virus lies or the person who pushed the lie.

I repeat my points on this, because this lie is extremely dangerous (human rights, possible future ‘RNA’ treatment jabs).

  1. I cited sources stating that there were no mRNA in the content of the jab, no matter how much they were different like one type containing even thallium but there were no biological material in them. (nitrogen an phosphorous were missing, basic elements of forming a molecule like RNA)
  2. Graphene oxide becomes magnetic when mixed with biological material, hence there couldn’t be any biological material in the vials, except eg. in Japan (contamination) when the content stuck together and they discarded more than a million vials.

To summarize, the atoms forming RNA are primarily carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and phosphorus.

Anita Baxas MD on how graphene oxide alone the cause of the turbo-cancer ‘pandemic’ and how it is DNA alternating (ruining) is also vital knowledge. (link in the photo)

sv40.JPG
Dan Gilfry
Dan Gilfry
18 days ago

Wow!
That’s like, they want to steal ten million dollars from you
so YOU squeal like baby pigs and then THEY say;
“OK! We’ll only steal NINE million dollars from you
and YOU squeal like HAPPY baby pigs and say;
“Let THAT be a lesson, Mother F-ckers!”

The Foreign Nazis know they can do WHATEVER
they want to you and you will NEVER fight back!

Stitchywitch
Stitchywitch
18 days ago

No country in the world benefits from signing a treaty with the WHO. The only body that benefits, is the WHO itself, as it’s just a power grab. We don’t need a treaty, no country should even be considering signing it.

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
Reply to  Stitchywitch
18 days ago

New world order, one world government is the end game.

biggrump
biggrump
18 days ago

I don’t think it is wise to get too carried away yet. I am sure that they will put in some innocuous-looking clauses that can be interpreted to give them the power they want.

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
18 days ago

Win a battle but not the war.
Tyrants will only back down temporarily..

Nicole
Nicole
18 days ago

They always go hard at first, to test the level of pushback/protests, then they’ll pull back and go quiet for a while and come back with what appears to be an amended and more palatable proposal.
Same old playbook. They’ll keep going and will never stop.
One way or another they’ll get their way. If not with the treaty, then with another one of the multitude of evil strategies up their sleeve!
This doesn’t end until we end it, but there’s hell to go through first.

Stuart-james.
Stuart-james.
18 days ago

They only hold jurisdiction over the citizen/legal fiction/legal entity, whatever the name. Their claim it remains fraudulent.

Mrs D
Mrs D
Reply to  Stuart-james.
18 days ago

3rd repost Patricia, please publish this or the 2nd one:

A couple of others post this stuff too, you can wave a bit of paper or whatever until you’re blue in the face.

It won’t make any difference sadly, they no longer want to allow us any rights at all.

Mrs D
Mrs D
Reply to  Mrs D
18 days ago

It is me, amazed that comment was posted, the a and m in mail were reversed but the comment was published. Strange.

Stuart-james.
Stuart-james.
Reply to  Mrs D
18 days ago

Look under notes of a standard British passport section 4 paragraph 2. The Crown claims ownership of the citizen identity document. A citizen, by definition, is a legal fiction or a legal entity or even a digital identity created by the Crown. So, unless one claims to be a citizen, there is no legal obligation to comply with any of their dictates. By claiming to be a citizen, put the claimant under the jurisdiction of the Crown. One may benefit from citizenship, but one is never a citizen!

Sergio
Sergio
18 days ago

Don’t trust them one tiny bit.
The only good news for me would be to finally see all the people responsible for this fake emergencies go to jail forever.
And let’s watch out for the next UN meeting.

Ken Hughes
Ken Hughes
18 days ago

‘Not impressed! I have learnt that the “Official” rumour, or declaration of intent, are always deliberately worse than the actual intent, so that when we see what they eventually do, we accept it with a sense of relief. A shabby transparent tactic to get their own way.
What is important is not what they have taken out, but what they have left in. THIS is what they always intended.
Apart from that, our nations HAD sovereignty throughout the Covid debacle but nevertheless did what the globalists wanted. I don’t expect it to be any different the next time.
So, in essence, nothing to see here, no change in practice.

Nbc9701
Nbc9701
18 days ago

Now is not the time to ease up on WHO et al, this is a small step, there is much more that they have not changed requiring that we continue to push back. As long as there are patents in existence granted to individuals, agencies of government, and corporations to control, modify, cause harm, to cause disease, suffering or disability, to access the body and mind for the same and or to transhumanize or alter DNA by these global leaders we cannot cease to raise alarm and call for an inestigation and end to such things. It is a fact that patents have been granted to do all that I mentioned and that should never be allowed.

Chris C
Chris C
18 days ago

This may be good news, but as Ralph Babet (of the United Australia Party) states in his recent interview with Maria Zeee on InfoWars, all western nations’ peoples must elect new politicians who promise to remove connections with the alphabet agencies (WHO, UN, WEF etc.).

Surely there are enough people with drive and vision amongst the 8 billion of us to help us create a world based on truth and freedom, in opposition to the current puppets of Satan who clearly are taking us into the hellhole of a Chines-style dystopia.

Mrs D
Mrs D
Reply to  Chris C
18 days ago

So hope you’re right Chris but won’t hold my breath. Think it’s truly Biblical now, Revelations IS the news.

Nor do i want it to continue, personally developed increasing knowledge about their plans over the last 40 years or so. We just don’t have the power or means to do anything about the toxic miasma of a system, we are forced to endure. However, there’s a big guy upstairs who knows when to sort it out.

K Mitchell
K Mitchell
18 days ago

Not excited. It’s a typical playbook. Ask for absurd handovers, then ‘compromise’ to where the always wanted to be.

Dave Owenhttps://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/for
Dave Owenhttps://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/for
18 days ago
Mrs D
Mrs D

Wow! That is some intro Dave, i’m intrigued. Some of her videos are inspired, this looks like one of them.

Mrs D
Mrs D
Reply to  Mrs D
18 days ago

Looks like Librewolf is the only browser i can post comments in currently. At least so far today.

Chris C
Chris C
Reply to  Mrs D
17 days ago

Hi Mrs D. Thanks for your comments and replies to mine.
Have you tried the Brave browser? Usable as it is or with private window or with Tor for even more privacy. I love it.
Sometimes I use protonVPN but it takes longer to start up.
I have used protonmail for years and they are a good company if help is needed by email.

Mrs D
Mrs D
Reply to  Chris C
16 days ago

Cheers to you two friend and ditto, i have the proprietary version of Proton.

Also have Brave Browser, along with a couple of others. Librewolf doesn’t have so many bells and whistles and whistles as Brave, however, they’ve stripped the telemetry and other iffy features from Firefox. Sadly, feel a little suspicious of Brave lately, they no longer resize jpg uploads for the background and the images they present are disturbing to me. Have chosen the colour gradients for presentation which sadly, isn’t always honoured.

Think you might be a fellow Linux user, recommend installing Librewolf via terminal, the script can be found on their installation page. Terminal install is a lot smaller and cleaner than the software manager/flatpak app.

Mrs D
Mrs D
Reply to  Mrs D
16 days ago

Oops! Too, don’t think you have a split personality Chris =)

LightHat
LightHat
18 days ago
trackback
17 days ago

[…] HUGE: Could The WHO be BACKING DOWN on the Pandemic Treaty?  The Pandemic treaty is still in the process of being drafted; however, the most recent draft may suggest that the World Health Organization (WHO) is “backing down” as the most draconian articles within the treaty have been removed, according to Peter Imanuelsen. “This is a major victory for freedom,” he says. […]

trackback
17 days ago

[…] HUGE: Could The WHO be BACKING DOWN on the Pandemic Treaty? […]

Stuart-james.
Stuart-james.
17 days ago

Look under notes of a standard British passport section 4 paragraph 2. The Crown claims ownership of the citizen identity document. A citizen, by definition, is a legal fiction or a legal entity or even a digital identity created by the Crown. So, unless one claims to be a citizen, there is no legal obligation to comply with any of their dictates. By claiming to be a citizen, it puts the claimant under the jurisdiction of the Crown. One may benefit from citizenship, but one is never a citizen!

Redsheep
Redsheep
17 days ago

Just the reverse of bait and switch. These Luciferians abide and operate with different laws and philosophies than other people. Their henchmen and women do too. They find it totally acceptable to say or write one thing and do the complete opposite. They do not plan to offer us quarter. Psychological games like another commenter wrote.

People have to learn to wrap their heads around Luciferianism, ie, lies, deceit, betrayal, murder, terror, raping children are part of their religion. Just being an atheist cannot compare. They are not human, though they have the appearance. As children, they are abused and inculcated with the utmost of evil. Every semblance of human compassion is beaten from them. They are schooled in the religion of Lucifer, make human sacrifices (babies and children are the best) to him as Moloch.

When I hear they are supposedly
“backing down” from their evil, I know it is just a ploy to make more people play their game and accept it. You must be wily as a fox and know how they play.

trackback
17 days ago

[…] as if WHO has taken out some of the more controversial provisions.  While some have claimed WHO is “backing down” and this is a “major victory for freedom,” they may have been too […]

trackback
17 days ago

[…] as if WHO has taken out some of the more controversial provisions.  While some have claimed WHO is “backing down” and this is a “major victory for freedom,” they may have been too […]

trackback
17 days ago

[…] se pare că OMS a eliminat unele dintre prevederile mai controversate. În timp ce unii au pretins OMS „da înapoi” și aceasta este o „victorie majoră a libertății”, s-ar putea să fi fost prea […]

trackback
16 days ago

[…] certaines des dispositions les plus controversées. Même si certains ont affirmé que l’OMS « reculait » et qu’il s’agissait d’une « victoire majeure pour la liberté », ils ont peut-être […]

Jon
Jon
16 days ago

Don’t trust them even a millimeter! Only safe thing is EXIT THE WHO

BrotherHugh
BrotherHugh
16 days ago

This “Good News” is exactly the kind of Deep State ploy that has been used so successfully to weaken opposition, especially at times – like now – when we need to stand up against the PT.

trackback
16 days ago

[…] if WHO has taken out some of the more controversial provisions.  While some have claimed WHO is “backing down” and this is a “major victory for freedom,” they may have been too […]

trackback
16 days ago

[…] as if WHO has taken out some of the more controversial provisions.  While some have claimed WHO is “backing down” and this is a “major victory for freedom,” they may have been too […]