Doctors for Patients UK submitted testimonies to the People’s Vaccine Inquiry from several doctors.  One of them was psychiatrist Dr. Ali Ajaz who was employed by the NHS but left due to pending vaccine mandates.

“The NHS’s handling of the covid-19 vaccine rollout exemplified a top-down approach where frontline doctors, including myself, were discouraged from applying medical scrutiny or expressing concerns,” he said.

Adding. “The role of doctors has increasingly shifted towards that of employees who must adhere to corporate and governmental directives, often at the expense of medical autonomy and the broader, holistic consideration of patient health.”

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Are You a Human? 2 + 7 =

---

The UK’s People’s Vaccine Inquiry (“the Inquiry”) was launched on Monday in reaction to the UK Covid Inquiry postponing its inquiry into covid vaccines.  The government’s Covid Inquiry’s hearings on vaccines – Module 4 – was originally scheduled to take place in the summer of 2024. In January 2024 the government’s inquiry announced it was rescheduling Module 4 without indicating a date when. Subsequently, it announced it plans to hear evidence in January 2025.

Taking inspiration from the Canadian National Citizens Inquiry, a group of professionals believed it was in the public interest to give immediate access to their expert testimony on the covid vaccines and so launched their own public inquiry.

You can follow the People’s Vaccine Inquiry on Twitter HERE and you can watch or read all the testimonials on its website HERE. The organisers of the Inquiry encourage other experts to come forward and provide additional testimonials by submitting them via ***@**********************co.uk/”>THIS email link.

Doctors for Patients UK (“DfPUK”) have already submitted their written statement to the Inquiry.  Within DfPUK’s 77-page statement are testimonies from several doctors: consultant cardiologist and general physician Dr. Dean Patterson; oncologist Professor Angus Dalgleish; surgeons Mr. T James Royle, Mr. Ian McDermott and Mr. Tony Hintonon; psychiatrist Dr. Ali Ajaz; emergency department doctor Dr. Scott Mitchell; general practitioners Dr. Kathy Grieg, Dr. Caroline Lapworth, Dr. Ayiesha Malik and Dr. Tim Kelly.

Dr. Ali Ajaz is a Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist with over 18 years in practice. He has extensive experience in acting as an expert witness in both criminal and civil proceedings. He worked in the National Health Service (“NHS”) based in London and has a special interest in cultural psychiatry, having worked for a cultural consultation service in East London.

Dr. Ajaz left his employment at the NHS due to the proposed enforcement of covid injection mandates.  The mandates, he said, “were ethically and scientifically unsound.”

(Related: UK Doctors Call For Government Investigation of mRNA Covid Vaccines Due to “Alarming Safety Profile,” Dr. Ali Ajaz, 2 January 2023)

His concerns were amplified by an inability within the NHS to freely question or debate the response to the covid pandemic.  In his testimony to the Inquiry, he wrote:

Requests for open dialogue with senior figures were consistently met with defensive and dismissive attitudes. Efforts to critically assess the evidence supporting various medical interventions were systematically obstructed. Historical concerns raised by previous medical studies were disregarded, in favour of a narrative driven by authorities lacking medical expertise. This approach prioritised conformity and compliance over rigorous scientific scrutiny and open debate.

Concerns about the rapid development and endorsement of vaccines were obstructed, including significant historical data on mRNA vaccine trials on animals which indicated adverse outcomes. Previous failures in developing coronavirus vaccines and the problematic implications of lipid nanoparticles – which are known to permeate various bodily organs – were also overlooked. These red flags were dismissed in favour of a narrative driven by authorities lacking in medical qualifications, emphasising compliance over critical scientific evaluation The vaccine’s rapid development and endorsement involved overlooking substantial red flags – such as the prior failures in developing a coronavirus vaccine and the problematic implications of lipid nanoparticles that permeate various bodily organs.

The NHS’s handling of the covid-19 vaccine rollout exemplified a top-down approach where frontline doctors, including myself, were discouraged from applying medical scrutiny or expressing concerns. Institutional pressure to conform without question, and the stigmatisation of dissent within the trust, particularly highlighted by how critical thinkers often become silent adherents upon ascending to middle management roles, convinced me of a profound ethical crisis.

Concerns raised regarding mRNA vaccines and lipid nanoparticles were obstructed. Historical data on mRNA vaccine trials on animals, which showed significant adverse outcomes, were overlooked in favour of a narrative pushed by authorities unqualified in medical science, prioritising compliance over critical evaluation.

The role of doctors has increasingly shifted towards that of employees who must adhere to corporate and governmental directives, often at the expense of medical autonomy and the broader, holistic consideration of patient health. This undermines the physician’s ability to advocate for long-term, sustainable health solutions over immediate, but potentially harmful, interventions.

The pandemic response ignored significant collateral damage and prioritised short-term measures with scant evidence of efficacy, illustrating a neglect of the broader implications on societal health and wellbeing.

Doctors for patients UK, Submission To The People’s Vaccine Inquiry, 10 June 2024, pg. 28

The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…

Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?

Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.

The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.

Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.

Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Daily Digest

US News Posts

UK News Posts

World News Posts

All News Posts

Are You a Human? 9 + 8 =

Just like the UK, the US imposes “renewable” energy and charges consumers for creating an unreliable and costly energy supply

Opinion: History will not remember Keir Starmer kindly … if it remembers him at all

Targeted Individuals: Once you are aware, at least you can protect yourself

Is This the Beginning of the End for UK Asylum Hotels?

Rhoda Wilson

While previously it was a hobby culminating in writing articles for Wikipedia (until things made a drastic and undeniable turn in 2020) and a few books for private consumption, since March 2020 I have become a full-time researcher and writer in reaction to the global takeover that came into full view with the introduction of covid-19. For most of my life, I have tried to raise awareness that a small group of people planned to take over the world for their own benefit. There was no way I was going to sit back quietly and simply let them do it once they made their final move.

See Full Bio