|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
“I object to the WHO’s Pandemic Agreement. Medicine should only be carried out between doctor and patient,” Robin Monotti said.
It’s bad enough when governments start to dictate medicine. It’s even worse when the likes of WHO mandate “generic solutions.”
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Last week, Robin Monotti, an Italian architect and film producer based in London, tweeted a video statement about his thoughts on the Pandemic Treaty that is being negotiated by a group at the World Health Organisation (“WHO”). In the comment accompanying his video, he said:
“I object to the WHO’s Pandemic Agreement. Medicine should only be carried out between doctor and patient and subject to the specificities of both. It’s bad enough when governments start to dictate generic medicine. Even worse when transnational bodies which are under the control of oligarchs, like the WHO, get to dictate what is and isn’t a medical emergency and mandate generic solutions rather than patient-specific approaches, which may even be: do nothing different and ignore the fearmongering!”
Monotti was answering a call James Roguski has been making for a couple of weeks and reiterated in a recent interview with Noor Bin Ladin. He discussed WHO’s progress with the Pandemic Treaty, what this agreement really is about, the upcoming negotiating meetings and why you must publicly voice your dissent.
“This document,” Roguski said waving the Pandemic Agreement, is a “glorified, corrupt, racketeering – I hesitate to call it a trade agreement – but it’s about business. It’s crony capitalism to funnel money through all kinds of different sources from all kinds of different donors.”
“And the people who are pushing for it,” he said, “really should be called special interest lobbyists but they refer to them as ‘relevant stakeholders’.”
He continued, “There’s like 400 organisations who are participating in these [Pandemic Agreement] negotiations but do we get to participate? Does anybody ask the people? Has anyone in government said, ‘Hey, what is it that people want?”
“So, I have been asking everyone for the last couple of weeks, and I’ll ask you and I’ll ask everyone in the audience: Please, take out your phone, take out the camera, take out your laptop or your computer – or borrow one of those things from somebody … and speak your mind and put your public statement out there, on the internet on one of the many video posting platforms that are out there,” he said.
After researching what the Pandemic agreement is about and whether you support WHO’s plans or not, Roguski is ready to also receive your video statements. He will publish an article compiling all the videos he receives. You can send your video to him either via text message on (USA) 310-619-3055 or via email at ja***********@***il.com.
“Publish your statement [on social media or the internet],” he said, “because at this point in time, as always, your silence is equivalent to your consent … If you’re silent and not going to speak up about it, nothing’s going to change.”
In May, the World Health Assembly (“WHA”) ended without a Pandemic Agreement being adopted as hoped. However, the assembly “made concrete commitments to completing negotiations on a global pandemic agreement within a year, at the latest.”
Since then, WHO’s Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (“INB”) has met twice, once in July, the 10th time the body has convened since its inception, and again in September for the 11th time. INB was established in 2021 by WHO to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response
Yesterday, WHO released a provisional agenda for the 12th meeting of the INB, which is scheduled to take place next month from 4 to 15 November.
The second item on the agenda is: “Negotiation of and agreement on the proposed WHO Pandemic Agreement.” Note the words “agreement on.” The intention is for the INB to agree on the final text of WHO’s proposed Pandemic Agreement so that it can be put forward for adoption at the next WHA.
The Pandemic Agreement has taken on various names since the concept of a global health dictatorship using pandemics was first publicised. It began by being described as an “international treaty for pandemic preparedness and response” when on 30 March 2021 24 world leaders and Tedros the Terrorist signed a joint letter calling for it to be established. Since then, it has also been referred to using various names including the Pandemic Accord, Pandemic Treaty and WHO Convention Agreement + (“WHO CA+”).
Related: G7 Summit to issue another statement on the Pandemic Treaty
Roguski noted in an article yesterday, “They have publicly stated that they hope to reach agreement during their next set of meetings on a streamlined version of the ‘Pandemic Agreement’, which some people have referred to as the Pandemic Agreement ‘Lite’.”
According to Roguski, they desperately want to reach an agreement in November so they can call a World Health Assembly in December before Joe Biden leaves office.
As “the negotiations are not even close to reaching a consensus, they have suggested splitting the ‘Pandemic Agreement’ into three separate legal instruments,” Roguski wrote on 7 October. The benefit to them of splitting the Pandemic Agreement into three is that the contentious issues in the proposed Pandemic Agreement presented to the WHA in May can be kicked down the road while the foundations of the ‘Pandemic Agreement’ are agreed.
As Health Policy Watch noted, “The latest draft of the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) pandemic agreement shifts key decisions to the Conference of the Parties (COP) – a body that will be set up after the World Health Assembly (WHA) has adopted the agreement.”
Related: WHO releases draft Pandemic Treaty with COP to ensure implementation and compliance
WHO’s three instruments for pandemic preparedness and response are now:
- Pandemic Agreement.
- Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) instrument, which was previously Article 12.2 of the last officially released draft of the Pandemic Agreement.
- Pandemic prevention and surveillance instrument, which was previously Article 4.3 of the last officially released draft of the pandemic Agreement.
Neither of the two new instruments has yet been made publicly available. You can read the last officially released draft of the Pandemic Agreement dated 27 May 2024 HERE and the latest unofficial draft released by Health Policy Watch on 19 September 2024 HERE.
“If we allow the ‘powers that be’ to get what they want, the details of these international ‘instruments’ will be determined after the ‘Pandemic Agreement’ has been adopted,” Roguski wrote.
Further reading:
- The International Monetary Fund, the World Bank Group, and the World Health Organisation step up cooperation on pandemic preparedness, Meryl Nass, 4 October 2024
- The Pandemic Treaty developers do not want to tell other negotiators how they actually envision it working, Meryl Nass, 9 October 2024
- Are the Pandemic Treaty negotiators being silently cut out of negotiations on pathogen access and benefits? Meryl Nass, 9 October 2024
Featured image: Governments progress on negotiations for a pandemic agreement to boost global preparedness for future emergencies, World Health Organisation, 20 September 2024
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
I don’t care much about their crappy “agreement” since the crappier source of it doesn’t have any “authority” over me and never will. Don’t really know how this weird experience will end but I’m definitely one hundred percent certain it won’t be by forced poisoning. O no, I can really feel how my unofficial social credit score plummeted.
Let the ‘paths continue to show their full colours.
Who knows – even the most moronic of medical-industrial complex groupies might start to wake up because of this ‘treaty’.
In the meantime all sensible people will flatly ignore any diktats that tell them what to put in their own bodies anyway – no matter what – , especially after the ‘covid’ and ‘vaccine’ plandemic debacle.
Night night NWO, it was nice knowing you.
Now Tedros´ consigliere, Bill Gates, have his daydream come true.
Now we just wait next pandemic and mandatory vaccines.
They will come…
Judge Orders Bill Gates To Stand Trialhttps://rumble.com/v5jqgf1-judge-orders-bill-gates-to-stand-trial-for-murdering-millions-via-mrna-jabs.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
Judge Orders Bill Gates To Stand Trial
https://rumble.com/v5jqgf1-judge-orders-bill-gates-to-stand-trial-for-murdering-millions-via-mrna-jabs.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
A bunch of emotionally immature psychopaths came up with a plan, didn’t tell anyone about it, then put in rule where silence is consent.
Asinine.
This crap will go through in one form or another since they intend to inject everyone. One is deluded to think that some prostituted politician of any color shape or form are going to stop this since they are all in on it. As we could se with the Convid scam were politicians of all countries acted as one with some minor differences. There were some that acted in a other way, like Magufuli in Tanzania, and they are all dead. This will eventually boil down to what each and every individual choose to do the day when they come for each and everyone of us. Run Forrest, RUN…
Just Qoute Bill gates after he makes 500 million profit selling pfizer stock at the right time… then says oh covid really wasnt that bad ,just a flue!!
Criminal all this going on ,even WHO involved!
The jumped the shark on the last scamdemic. Whatever they come up, people will resist this time around.
Majority of sheep still asleep sadly.
I have already notified the WHO that I won’t comply with their orders.
[…] declarația [on social media or the internet],” a spus Roguski acum câteva săptămâni reiterându-și apelul, „pentru că în acest moment, ca întotdeauna, tăcerea ta este […]
[…] your statement [on social media or the internet],” Roguski said a couple of weeks ago reiterating his call, “because at this point in time, as always, your silence is equivalent to […]
[…] your statement [on social media or the internet],” Roguski said a couple of weeks ago reiterating his call, “because at this point in time, as always, your silence is equivalent to […]
[…] votre déclaration [sur les médias sociaux ou sur Internet],” Roguski a dit il y a quelques semaines réitérant son appel, “parce qu’à ce moment-là, comme toujours, votre silence est […]
[…] your statement [on social media or the internet],” Roguski said a couple of weeks ago reiterating his call, “because at this point in time, as always, your silence is equivalent to […]
[…] své prohlášení na sociálních sítích nebo na internetu,“ řekl před pár týdny Roguski a zopakoval svou výzvu, „protože v tuto chvíli, jako vždy, je vaše mlčení ekvivalentní […]