|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Four years ago, Dr. Mery Nass explained why the deep state loves the “no virus” narrative. On Wednesday, she republished her article.
She originally published her article because she was asked to comment on claims made in an Off-Guardian article that SARS-CoV-2 had not been isolated and, therefore, the virus did not exist and was nothing but a computer model.
All those years ago, Dr, Nass confirmed that the virus is real, citing evidence such as its contagious nature, predictable incubation period and response to antiviral drugs. Additionally, by that time, hundreds of thousands of whole genome sequences of the virus had been uploaded into international databases by scientists worldwide – it’s highly unlikely that all these sequences were false.
So why does the “fake virus” or “there is no virus” narrative persist? One possibility is to distract from the true origin of the virus and the role of gain-of-function research.
Related: Dr. Sabine Stebel: A virus does not need to be isolated to engineer a viral protein
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
The Deep State Loves The “No Virus” Narrative And Why Viruses Are Real
By Dr. Meryl Nass, 26 March 2025
I think it is important for us not to fight over this, but we can, of course, disagree.
However, if people believe SARS-CoV-2 is NOT a virus, then we don’t need to investigate, shut down or restrict biodefense/biowarfare labs. We don’t have to look to governments for the origin. We cannot investigate whether we have been deliberately attacked. And we cannot justify using HCQ or ivermectin or other drugs for treatment.
Do you see how denying the existence of a virus plays into the globalists’ hands?
No one ever has grappled with these arguments. Even when I get 1,000 comments on a post about “no-viruses.” That is the tip-off that the deep state is running this psyop.
Is the Virus Real?
By Dr. Meryl Nass, 21 February 2021
I continue to be asked if the virus is real. I answered this question in two prior blog posts, below:
- The testing mess, lack of reliable data on Covid-19, and a hypothesis why, 13 October 2020
- Is the virus real? Has it been photographed? What about Koch’s postulates? What to do? 5 January 2021
But Off-Guardian has a new article claiming the virus is fake, and I was again asked to comment.
Here is a description of its culture and isolation, with additional details in the supplementary materials, for those who continue to clamour for it:
Caly L, Druce J, Roberts J, Bond K, Tran T, Kostecki R, Yoga Y, Naughton W, Taiaroa G, Seemann T, Schultz MB, Howden BP, Korman TM, Lewin SR, Williamson DA, Catton MG. Isolation and rapid sharing of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) from the first patient diagnosed with COVID-19 in Australia. Med J Aust. 2020 Jun;212(10):459-462. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50569. Epub 2020 Apr 1. PMID: 32237278; PMCID: PMC7228321.
Since I have explained some technical aspects in the two prior posts, I will be brief. Please read John McGowan’s comment[1] to the second post for greater detail, which helps debunk the Off-Guardian article.
1. There has been tremendous falsification of information on almost every aspect of the pandemic. I don’t think there is much question about that, and I understand that it makes people appropriately suspicious about the reality of the virus, too. Particularly when people with MDs and PhDs after their names claim it does not exist.
2. I am willing to go on record to say that Andrew Kaufman, MD (a psychiatrist, not a molecular biologist, who got his undergrad degree in the same department I did at MIT – Biology) who is quoted in the piece, is wrong and ignorant, besides. As are others.
3. Here is the key argument: I have challenged those who deny covid is caused by a real virus to explain what, exactly, is causing these symptoms if it is not a virus. One suggested toxins. Or 5G.
- Well, toxins and 5G and exosomes are not contagious, but this disease is.
- It has a very predictable incubation period, averaging 6 days.
- Properly used PPE protects the wearer from exposure.
- It causes mostly similar syndromes in those who get very ill.
- The syndrome, while relatively unique, is similar to that caused by SARS-1 in 2003.
- The illness responds well to antiviral drugs. Patients get better quickly when viral-killing protocols, including hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin, are used early in the illness.
These simple facts, along with the arguments I have made in the two linked blog posts, confirm that we are facing an infectious disease, and it is caused by a virus.
4. Hundreds of thousands of whole genome sequences (maps of every nucleotide in the virus’ RNA) have been uploaded by scientists in scores of countries to international databases, each with its own local mutations. You would need to isolate and grow these viruses in order to sequence them. Saying that all these sequences are false requires that thousands of scientists are lying, together, about the work they have done. Since these scientists are from the US, China, Russia and everywhere else, getting them all to tell the same lie would not be simple.
5. Did this virus originate in a lab? Almost certainly. Was it spread deliberately? I don’t know. It could have been accidental. If it was spread deliberately, who did it? I don’t know that either.
If you approach this question by asking who had the means, motive and opportunity to commit such a crime, we can at least begin the discussion.
- Means: Scientists in multiple countries, including the US and China, had the means to produce a virus like this.
- Motive: Who is benefiting from the pandemic? The $US dollar, Amazon, Elon, Facebook, Zoom, Twitter and the surveillance state, for a start.
- Opportunity: Since the World Military Games were held in Wuhan in October, military staff from dozens of countries had the opportunity. Wuhan is also an international trading centre. Maybe anyone visiting Wuhan last fall had an opportunity.
If this No-Virus theory is so easy to debunk, why does it keep popping up? I am starting to wonder if it isn’t a psyop, repeatedly inserted into the discourse to stop people from looking into the true origin of the virus … looking into the funders of gain-of-function research on coronaviruses at NIAID and elsewhere … and looking into what exactly they were trying to do and for whom …
Those are the important questions, particularly in terms of avoiding a repeat lab-derived pandemic.
Please don’t waste any more of your time on the “fake virus” hypothesis. We don’t have the time or luxury to fight each other. We need all hands on deck to turn back the Great Reset (whatever it is supposed to be) and regain sane control of our societies.
Note added by The Exposé:
[1] Comment posted on 18 May 2021 by “Unknown” under Dr. Nass’ article ‘Is the virus real? Has it been photographed? What about Koch’s postulates? What to do?’ which we have assumed was posted by John McGowan reads:
“So far there has been 1,500,000 isolations (https://www.Gisaid.org)
475,000 sequences (https://sars2.cvr.gla.ac.uk/cog-uk/)
and so many purifications of the sars-cov2 virus as they needed many copies to create antiviral molecules for further study which you can buy from 100’s of websites – 1 example:(https://thenativeantigencompany.com/products/sars-cov-2-purified-viral-lysate/) and this is just from a few organisations, there’s 100’s across the world running their own studies, experiments and tests. Someone even went out of their way to demonstrate that Koch’s postulates can be met, even though its a 130 years out of date practise (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32215622/). What I see a lot being written or claimed by a lot of people is “covid19 has not been isolated….”, which is a schoolboy error or a pseudo misunderstanding and like chickenpox, cold sores and colds which are all diseases you dont isolate diseases, you isolate herpes, varicella, rhinoviruses and sars-cov2 which are all the viruses that cause the diseases. The 1st full genome sequence was released March 2020 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947) It was then categorised in taxonomy, which is a database of the entire virosphere (https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/CONHSP) by running many tests on it such as phylogenic analysis, Putative recombination, ML tree research and placed into a type and lineage.”
About the Author
Dr. Meryl Nass is a physician and researcher who proved that the world’s largest anthrax epidemic, in Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe), was due to biological warfare. She had her license suspended for prescribing covid medications that worked. She posts invaluable information on her Substack page ‘Meryl’s Covid Newsletter’ and the website ‘Door to Freedom’. She also occasionally posts articles on a blog titled ‘Anthrax Vaccine’.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
That’s not what Dr Sam Bailey says.
Indeed, Dr Sam Bailey and her husband Dr Mark Bailey have researched, written and discussed extensively unmasking the viral theory and it’s fraudulent base germ theory of this whole medical edifice built on sand, but it’s coming down!
The Healthcare System Hoax – Dr Sam Bailey
In the article – “Do you see how denying the existence of a virus plays into the globalists’ hands?”
Are you a Globalist?
Dr. Nass says, “However, if people believe SARS-CoV-2 is NOT a virus, then we don’t need to investigate, shut down or restrict biodefense/biowarfare labs…Do you see how denying the existence of a virus plays into the globalists’ hands?”
That conclusion could be contended. Dr. Tom Cowan (co-author of “The Contagion Myth”), I think, said in a v1deo (I can’t find the exact quote now) something like biowarfare labs can still be working on stuff other than viruses and he mentions that he thinks at such facilities they were working on the stuff that was injected into people with the so-called “COVID” injections.
Also, I don’t think all “no viruses” people can be globalists because I’ve read/heard of some people who fall into that camp somewhat and who also aren’t convinced of a globe Earth and flat earthers can’t really be globalists, by definition, can they? 🙂
You’re “on the ball”!
Haha, figuratively speaking, of course! 😉
These “no viruses” people are just stupid ignorants. Probably US citizens.
Having read articles by Sam Bailey, Meryl Nass and others, I am convinced that Meryl Nass is right.
Bill Gates Funding Ebola Vaccine Trial In United States That Sheds Live Virus 31% Colorado is injecting Healthcare workers with live Ebola.
https://banned.video/watch?id=65aabe75a2bca6fd626438ca
BREAKING: Americans Being Infected With Live Ebola By Secret Bill Gates Project
https://banned.video/watch?id=65aac93aa2bca6fd6266251d
Now, Colorado is injecting Healthcare workers with live Ebola.
https://www.9news.com/article/news/health/denver-health-medical-team-first-ebola-vaccine/73-b3d8f0fd-35a4-4dff-b67b-19e566cb6d6f
Which has a 30% shedding rate spreading to non-consenting adults who don’t want to get JABs. Denver Health administers 1st shots of Ebola vaccines
https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/infection-control/denver-health-administers-1st-shots-of-ebola-vaccines.html
Ashleigh Hollowell Wednesday, November 29th, 2023 In 2015, HHS designated Denver Health one of 13 Regional Emerging Special Pathogens Treatment Centers in the U.S. — serving as an infectious disease training and care hub for six states in its region.
It is one of the first health systems in the country to administer the vaccine, according to the news outlet.
The vaccine, Ervebo, was first approved by the FDA in 2019 for anyone older than 1. While outbreaks have continued across the globe, Ebola is less frequently seen in the U.S.
* CDC claims the Ebola outbreak is over.
Yet, Bill Gates funds Ebola injections that JABs Colorado Healthcare workers with live Ebola that shed 30% of live Ebola virus.
It’s genetically engineered mosquitoes delivering malaria parasites to humans. Yes, you read that right.
DECEMBER 29, 2024: Netherlands: Bill Gates GMO Mosquito-Delivered Parasites in a JAB Bill Gates Funded Millions Bio-weapons Laboratory
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/bill-gates-funnels-millions-into-biolab-developing-mosquito-delivered-vaccines-and-gmo-parasites/
December 29, 2024
Bill Gates is funding scientists in the Netherlands to engineer mosquitoes that inject humans with genetically modified malaria parasites—raising serious ethical and safety concerns about bioengineered vaccines delivered without consent.
If you’ve been following my research over the years, you’ll know this isn’t the first time Bill Gates has been linked to ethically questionable experiments with global consequences.
But this time, it’s not a vaccine center or pharmaceutical company in the headlines—it’s genetically engineered mosquitoes delivering malaria parasites to humans. Yes, you read that right.
Dick Cheney: Pentagon To Create Race Specific Biological Weapons to take out Citizens/Specific Ethnic Group’s
Dick Cheney: page 60 of Rebuilding America Pentagon New Century Adopted by the Pentagon.
* kill Target: Blacks & Whites
* Doesn’t target: Chinese or Jews (Ashkenazi)
Dick Cheney: page 60 of Rebuilding America Pentagon New Century Adopted by the Pentagon.
Starting @ 20:10 – 22:00 minute mark.
https://banned.video/watch?id=64b99e126d90d9096dee2d4a
There was no covid ! It was the Flu !
Look at the data, there was no Flu 2020/21 just this so called COVID
I agree. There is no such thing as a “germ” or a “virus”. Never been proven to exist. Wake up people!
There WAS a virus. I and my husband had it – badly. We know it exists and we know that Prof Luc Montagnier was right, when he said, right at the start of the plandemic (highly censored, of course), that it was a lab-engineered virus mixed with a strand of HIV, as well as other stuff. A group of Indian scientists, separately, also reached the same conclusions and were forced to withdraw their study. I know that since I was attacked with “Covid” (by military personnel at a demonstration) my immune system has never been the same, and my respiratory illnesses now last much longer than before.
Well, it is true that data such as in an article by Scientific American supports such a view, showing the flu rate recorded in 2020/21 was claimed to be about one hundredth of its normal amount, or something like that
Dr Vernon Coleman is the only go to for facts on covid and he says there has never been an isolation in spite of rewards being offered. End of
Really? As much as I love Dr Coleman I don’t always agree with him. He has been very outspoken and insulting about “no virus” people like me. Has he changed his mind? Can you post what he said please?
Yes, Vernon is an interesting fellow.
This article quotes him as saying, “(For the record I don’t believe that covid-19 was man-made. It is simply the ordinary flu with a marketing budget. But, as I have explained elsewhere, it suits the conspirators to encourage the myth that it came from a lab in China.)”
He also says that viruses, in general, exist. He has said that someone tried to bribe him to publicly state “viruses do not exist.”
After facing years of censorship for his statements about covid, a publisher approached Dr. Coleman and said they would publish all his books if he publicly stated that there are no viruses. What does that tell you? That “there are no viruses” is a PsyOp and the major advocates, the social media influencers, the leaders or wannabe leaders of the movement have likely been bought off, bribed or blackmailed? If it is evidenced based, why would they need to coerce people to push the narrative “there are no viruses”?
Propaganda is not only disseminated through corporate media outlets. Propaganda is disseminated through whatever medium works for them – if people lose trust in corporate media and fact-checkers, then they will start up or fund “independent” media outlets and social media influencers, and try to turn trusted sources in the truth and freedom movement to work for them. Always use your critical thinking, do not blindly trust anything and definitely do not fall into the trap of following a single voice that pushes a single narrative. You do not need a leader to guide your thoughts or tell you what to think or do, you can easily think for yourself. Beware of anyone who tries gain authority over you because of their self-proclaimed “superior” knowledge, especially if they do not tolerate differing opinions.
Wow, that’s interesting to ponder about.
Be as that maybe,(aren’t the waters muddy!) nevertheless, viruses don’t exist as we have been brought up to believe they do.
Rather, in the way we have been brought up (educated/brainwashed) to believe they do.
Hi Islander, I haven’t been “brought up” to believe anything about viruses. The difference between me and a lot of people in this comments section is that I’m not following any narrative :). This has been my way since I was a teenager as I have explained to you in a previous comment. The first time I challenged teachers about viruses was when I was about 15 years old.
It is rare for me to blindly believe anything I’ve been told, I like to check things for myself before I come to a conclusion.
Have you noticed that a lot of commentators declaring their loyalty to the “no virus” idea have had nothing to say in defending Sam Bailey’s right to free speech in a subsequent article? Am I surprised? No. Why? Because their sole aim is promote the “no virus” narrative. Every day we are presented with more and more clues that the “no virus” narrative is a PsyOp.
The silence by commentators on this thread about what’s happened to Sam Bailey is an interesting phenomenon. So what can we take away from “no virus” activists remaining silent in defence of the freedom of speech of one of their own, so to speak. Could it be that she is in the process of being replaced as the face of the “no virus” PsyOp, just as she replaced Andrew Kaufman a few years ago? Or is it reverse psychology? Time will tell …
The “no virus” idea as you have been “brought up” to believe is a PsyOp, run by the same people who are running the covid PsyOp. It doesn’t take much to figure this out or why they would start and maintain a seemingly conflicting PsyOp – they are controlling both sides: the “covid is a deadly pandemic” narrative and the “there are no viruses” narrative. When they try to drag to you to one extreme or the other, try to stay in the middle of the road. They don’t like people who stick to the middle road because middle roaders are not so easy to manipulate.
Completely disingenuous for you to claim that you are “not following any narrative”. You are clearly pushing two narratives that i strongly disagree with. The first is the belief in non existent viruses and the second is your pro Zionist pro genocide narrative.
If you really like to check things for yourself before you come to a conclusion then you would have checked the methods section of virology papers. Clearly you have not done that and you refuse to listen to those of us that have.
What is happening to Dr Sam Bailey is disgusting. Many of us are already aware of the situation and so don’t feel the need to comment about it on your site. It is however very important that the limited hangout nonsense that you push is challenged.
If you stay in the middle of the road you get run over. Better to side with the truth and the evidence will lead you there if you bothered to look at it.
Rhoda,
Unlike you, I have been brought up to believe in viruses.
As a kid in my schooldays my mother would tell me to steer clear of anyone sneezing or coughing, just in case I were to catch a cold/flu through those nasty (non-existent) airborne viruses that would be circulating in the winter months. Fear hath torment. 1 John 4:18-doesn’t it just!?
These awful theories of viruses were put forward by TPTB as fact, and pretty much everyone believed the lie.
All this talk of psyops is to some extent beyond me, but I am not so daft as to know when I see chicanery at work.
I agree with Sam’s comment on Dr. Sam Bailey.
Having said this, I have said many times in the past that the Bible clearly teaches (if you can receive it) that airborne disease/contagion is thoroughly unscriptural (aka a damnable lie).
A person mentions Mark Steele and his take on contagious radiation poisoning, certainly this is not fully understood as yet, but to the best of my knowledge there are only two things contagious-laughter and yawning…
Hi Islander, I agree that 5G is having health effects but it is not the sole factor. 5G is relatively new and it is used in a limited number of places in the world. 5G is just one of the many factors that is causing disease or making diseases worse.
Viruses do exist. But they’re little to be afraid of (unless they are injected into you). There is a lot that they don’t tell us about viruses. For example, most (99.9999’%) are either benign or beneficial to us.
Another thing they downplay is immunity. Do you recall the saying “you never catch the same cold twice”? Its true. Natural immunity is life long. Not only that, we pass immunity onto each other which is why children (with strong immune systems) who have recently recovered from an infection should spend time, close contact (touching, hugging, sitting on laps), with their grandparents – doing this keeps their grandparents healthy, boosts their immunity to viruses. Children spending time with their grandparents and passing on their immunity is God’s natural vaccine, so to speak.
Another thing which isn’t discussed much is that viruses change our genome. Those who create fear about viruses (either to sell a pandemic or to sell the “no virus” idea) will instil in people the idea that viruses (i.e. naturally occurring) changing our genome (natural gene editing) is a bad thing – because the current drive by certain groups to unnaturally force edit our genes at will is a bad thing. But is natural viruses editing our genes (naturally) bad? Perhaps the change in our genome is to pass immunity onto the next generation and so protect the next generation getting ill from that virus – so it stops the same epidemic occurring in the next generation, perhaps to the third and fourth generations. God has equipped human beings, and animals, to survive within the environment.
Because of how viruses work, an outbreak of a viral illness will only last a few months, say, in any particular population. This is because viruses, most of the handful that infect humans cause flu-like symptoms, get less virulent. Flu does not kill people. Pneumonia does. (It must be noted that viruses injected into us can cause problems because the injections bypass our bodies’ first lines of defence. So avoid the vaccines, ALL vaccines.)
The “no virus” camp ignore these things as much as the “pandemic” camp does. And for the same reason – to either instil fear or feed on the fear that some people already have to manipulate them. The answer to the fear some people have about viruses is not to make up a story that they do not exist, its to show people why they should not be afraid. Viruses and bacteria make up our environment, they are all around us all the time – they are in our gut, they are in the air we breathe. We live in a soup of viruses and bacteria from the moment we are born to the moment we die, without them we would not be able to survive.
You claim that “viruses do exist”. I have asked you many times to post the evidence for that. So far absolutely nothing…
You claim to be “qualified in biomedicine with 35 years of experience.” I would have thought either your formal education would have taught you or, if not, during your 35 years experience you would have learnt how to conduct research. Its rather telling you’re not able to do that and instead rely on others to do it for you …
Lol what’s the point for deep state to love the “no virus” narrative when they need the otherwise to get people jabbeb in the poison Vax?…the Virus Narrative has always been the actual deepstate since it is their agenda to cause disease in healthy people…
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jan. 31, 2020; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120
and Gag
Prashant Pradhan$1,2, Ashutosh Kumar Pandey$1, Akhilesh Mishra$1, Parul Gupta1, Praveen
Kumar Tripathi1, Manoj Balakrishnan Menon1, James Gomes1, Perumal Vivekanandan*1and
Bishwajit Kundu*1
1
Kusuma School of biological sciences, Indian institute of technology, New Delhi-110016, India.
2
Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, New Delhi-110019, India
$
Equal contribution
* Corresponding authors- email: bk****@***************ac.in
vp******@***************ac.in
Abstract:
We are currently witnessing a major epidemic caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-
nCoV). The evolution of 2019-nCoV remains elusive. We found 4 insertions in the spike
glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses.
Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-
1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag. Interestingly, despite the inserts being discontinuous on the primary
amino acid sequence, 3D-modelling of the 2019-nCoV suggests that they converge to constitute
the receptor binding site. The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have
identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be
fortuitous in nature. This work provides yet unknown insights on 2019-nCoV and sheds light on
the evolution and pathogenicity of this virus with important implications for diagnosis of this virus.
Introduction
Coronaviruses (CoV) are single-stranded positive-sense RNA viruses that infect animals and
humans. These are classified into 4 genera based on their host specificity: Alphacoronavirus,
Betacoronavirus, Deltacoronavirus and Gammacoronavirus (Snijder et al., 2006). There are seven
known types of CoVs that includes 229E and NL63 (Genus Alphacoronavirus), OC43, HKU1,
MERS and SARS (Genus Betacoronavirus). While 229E, NL63, OC43, and HKU1 commonly
infect humans, the SARS and MERS outbreak in 2002 and 2012 respectively occurred when the
virus crossed-over from animals to humans causing significant mortality (J. Chan et al., n.d.; J. F.
W. Chan et al., 2015). In December 2019, another outbreak of coronavirus was reported from
Wuhan, China that also transmitted from animals to humans. This new virus has been temporarily
termed as 2019-novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by the World Health Organization (WHO) (J. F.-
W. Chan et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2020). While there are several hypotheses about the origin of
2019-nCoV, the source of this ongoing outbreak remains elusive.
The transmission patterns of 2019-nCoV is similar to patterns of transmission documented in the
previous outbreaks including by bodily or aerosol contact with persons infected with the virus.bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jan. 31, 2020; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Cases of mild to severe illness, and death from the infection have been reported from Wuhan. This
outbreak has spread rapidly distant nations including France, Australia and USA among others.
The number of cases within and outside China are increasing steeply. Our current understanding
is limited to the virus genome sequences and modest epidemiological and clinical data.
Comprehensive analysis of the available 2019- nCoV sequences may provide important clues that
may help advance our current understanding to manage the ongoing outbreak.
The spike glycoprotein (S) of cornonavirus is cleaved into two subunits (S1 and S2). The S1
subunit helps in receptor binding and the S2 subunit facilitates membrane fusion (Bosch et al.,
2003; Li, 2016). The spike glycoproteins of coronoviruses are important determinants of tissue
tropism and host range. In addition the spike glycoproteins are critical targets for vaccine
development (Du et al., 2013). For this reason, the spike proteins represent the most extensively
studied among coronaviruses. We therefore sought to investigate the spike glycoprotein of the
2019-nCoV to understand its evolution, novel features sequence and structural features using
computational tools.
Methodology
Retrieval and alignment of nucleic acid and protein sequences
We retrieved all the available coronavirus sequences (n=55) from NCBI viral genome database
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and we used the GISAID (Elbe & Buckland-Merrett,
2017)[https://www.gisaid.org/] to retrieve all available full-length sequences (n=28) of 2019-
nCoV as on 27 Jan 2020. Multiple sequence alignment of all coronavirus genomes was performed
by using MUSCLE software (Edgar, 2004) based on neighbour joining method. Out of 55
coronavirus genome 32 representative genomes of all category were used for phylogenetic tree
development using MEGAX software (Kumar et al., 2018). The closest relative was found to be
SARS CoV. The glycoprotein region of SARS CoV and 2019-nCoV were aligned and visualized
using Multalin software (Corpet, 1988). The identified amino acid and nucleotide sequence were
aligned with whole viral genome database using BLASTp and BLASTn. The conservation of the
nucleotide and amino acid motifs in 28 clinical variants of 2019-nCoV genome were presented by
performing multiple sequence alignment using MEGAX software. The three dimensional structure
of 2019-nCoV glycoprotein was generated by using SWISS-MODEL online server (Biasini et al.,
2014) and the structure was marked and visualized by using PyMol (DeLano, 2002).
Results
Uncanny similarity of novel inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and
Gag
Our phylogentic tree of full-length coronaviruses suggests that 2019-nCoV is closely related to
SARS CoV [Fig1]. In addition, other recent studies have linked the 2019-nCoV to SARS CoV.
We therefore compared the spike glycoprotein sequences of the 2019-nCoV to that of the SARS
CoV (NCBI Accession number: AY390556.1). On careful examination of the sequence
alignment we found that the 2019- nCoV spike glycoprotein contains 4 insertions [Fig.2]. To
further investigate if these inserts are present in any other corona virus, we performed a multiplebioRxiv preprint first posted online Jan. 31, 2020; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
sequence alignment of the spike glycoprotein amino acid sequences of all available
coronaviruses (n=55) [refer Table S.File1] in NCBI refseq (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) this includes one
sequence of 2019-nCoV[Fig.S1]. We found that these 4 insertions [inserts 1, 2, 3 and 4] are
unique to 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses analyzed. Another group from
China had documented three insertions comparing fewer spike glycoprotein sequences of
coronaviruses . Another group from China had documented three insertions comparing fewer
spike glycoprotein sequences of coronaviruses (Zhou et al., 2020).
Figure 1: Maximum likelihood genealogy show the evolution of 2019- nCoV: The evolutionary history
was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method and JTT matrix-based model. The tree
with the highest log likelihood (12458.88) is shown. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were
obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise
distances estimated using a JTT model, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihoodbioRxiv preprint first posted online Jan. 31, 2020; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
value. This analysis involved 5 amino acid sequences. There were a total of 1387 positions in the
final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X.
Figure 2: Multiple sequence alignment between spike proteins of 2019-nCoV and SARS. The
sequences of spike proteins of 2019-nCoV (Wuhan-HU-1, Accession NC_045512) and of SARS
CoV (GZ02, Accession AY390556) were aligned using MultiAlin software. The sites of difference
are highlighted in boxes.
We then analyzed all available full-length sequences (n=28) of 2019-nCoV in GISAID (Elbe &
Buckland-Merrett, 2017) as on January 27, 2020 for the presence of these inserts. As most of these
sequences are not annotated, we compared the nucleotide sequences of the spike glycoprotein of
all available 2019-nCoV sequences using BLASTp. Interestingly, all the 4 insertions were
absolutely (100%) conserved in all the available 2019- nCoV sequences analyzed [Fig.S2, Fig.S3].bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jan. 31, 2020; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
We then translated the aligned genome and found that these inserts are present in all Wuhan 2019-
nCoV viruses except the 2019-nCoV virus of Bat as a host [Fig.S4]. Intrigued by the 4 highly
conserved inserts unique to 2019-nCoV we wanted to understand their origin. For this purpose,
we used the 2019-nCoV local alignment with each insert as query against all virus genomes and
considered hits with 100% sequence coverage. Surprisingly, each of the four inserts aligned with
short segments of the Human immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) proteins. The amino acid
positions of the inserts in 2019-nCoV and the corresponding residues in HIV-1 gp120 and HIV-1
Gag are shown in Table 1. The first 3 inserts (insert 1,2 and 3) aligned to short segments of amino
acid residues in HIV-1 gp120. The insert 4 aligned to HIV-1 Gag. The insert 1 (6 amino acid
residues) and insert 2 (6 amino acid residues) in the spike glycoprotein of 2019-nCoV are 100%
identical to the residues mapped to HIV-1 gp120. The insert 3 (12 amino acid residues) in 2019-
nCoV maps to HIV-1 gp120 with gaps [see Table 1]. The insert 4 (8 amino acid residues) maps to
HIV-1 Gag with gaps.
Although, the 4 inserts represent discontiguous short stretches of amino acids in spike glycoprotein
of 2019-nCoV, the fact that all three of them share amino acid identity or similarity with HIV-1
gp120 and HIV-1 Gag (among all annotated virus proteins) suggests that this is not a random
fortuitous finding. In other words, one may sporadically expect a fortuitous match for a stretch of
6-12 contiguous amino acid residues in an unrelated protein. However, it is unlikely that all 4
inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike glycoprotein fortuitously match with 2 key structural proteins of
an unrelated virus (HIV-1).
The amino acid residues of inserts 1, 2 and 3 of 2019-nCoV spike glycoprotein that mapped to
HIV-1 were a part of the V4, V5 and V1 domains respectively in gp120 [Table 1]. Since the 2019-
nCoV inserts mapped to variable regions of HIV-1, they were not ubiquitous in HIV-1 gp120, but
were limited to selected sequences of HIV-1 [ refer S.File1] primarily from Asia and Africa.
The HIV-1 Gag protein enables interaction of virus with negatively charged host surface
(Murakami, 2008) and a high positive charge on the Gag protein is a key feature for the host-virus
interaction. On analyzing the pI values for each of the 4 inserts in 2019-nCoV and the
corresponding stretches of amino acid residues from HIV-1 proteins we found that a) the pI values
were very similar for each pair analyzed b) most of these pI values were 10±2 [Refer Table 1] . Of
note, despite the gaps in inserts 3 and 4 the pI values were comparable. This uniformity in the pI
values for all the 4 inserts merits further investigation.
As none of these 4 inserts are present in any other coronavirus, the genomic region encoding these
inserts represent ideal candidates for designing primers that can distinguish 2019-nCoV from other
coronaviruses.bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jan. 31, 2020; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
HIV
protein
and
Variable
region
Number
of Polar
ResiduesTotal
Char
gepI
Valu
e
5
52
211
11
Kenya*/
G6
62
210
10
gp120-
V1India*/C8
102
110.84
8.75
GagIndia*/C6
122
412.00
12.30
MotifsVirus
GlycoproteinInsert
12019- nCoV (GP)
HIV1(GP120)71
76
TNGTKR
TNGTKR
404 409gp120-
V4
Insert
22019- nCoV (GP)
HIV1(GP120)145 150
HKNNKS
HKNNKS
462 467gp120-
V5
Insert
32019- nCoV (GP)
HIV1(GP120)245
256
RSYL- – – -TPGDSSSG
RTYLFNETRGNSSSG
136
150Insert
42019- nCoV (Poly
P)
HIV1(gag)676
684
QTNS———————–PRRA
QTNSSILMQRSNFKG PRRA
366
384
Motif Alignment
HIV
Genome
Source
Country/
subtype
Thailand
*/
CRF01_
AE
Table 1: Aligned sequences of 2019-nCoV and gp120 protein of HIV-1 with their positions
in primary sequence of protein. All the inserts have a high density of positively charged
residues. The deleted fragments in insert 3 and 4 increase the positive charge to surface area
ratio. *please see Supp. Table 1 for accession numbers
The novel inserts are part of the receptor binding site of 2019-nCoV
To get structural insights and to understand the role of these insertions in 2019-nCoV glycoprotein,
we modelled its structure based on available structure of SARS spike glycoprotein (PDB:
6ACD.1.A). The comparison of the modelled structure reveals that although inserts 1,2 and 3 are
at non-contiguous locations in the protein primary sequence, they fold to constitute the part of
glycoprotein binding site that recognizes the host receptor (Kirchdoerfer et al., 2016) (Figure 4).
The insert 1 corresponds to the NTD (N-terminal domain) and the inserts 2 and 3 correspond to
the CTD (C-terminal domain) of the S1 subunit in the 2019-nCoV spike glycoprotein. The insert
4 is at the junction of the SD1 (sub domain 1) and SD2 (sub domain 2) of the S1 subunit (Ou et
al., 2017). We speculate, that these insertions provide additional flexibility to the glycoprotein
binding site by forming a hydrophilic loop in the protein structure that may facilitate or enhance
virus-host interactions.bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jan. 31, 2020; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Figure 3. Modelled homo-trimer spike glycoprotein of 2019-nCoV virus. The inserts from HIV
envelop protein are shown with colored beads, present at the binding site of the protein.
Evolutionary Analysis of 2019-nCoV
It has been speculated that 2019-nCoV is a variant of Coronavirus derived from an animal source
which got transmitted to humans. Considering the change of specificity for host, we decided to
study the sequences of spike glycoprotein (S protein) of the virus. S proteins are surface proteins
that help the virus in host recognition and attachment. Thus, a change in these proteins can be
reflected as a change of host specificity of the virus. To know the alterations in S protein gene of
2019-nCoV and its consequences in structural re-arrangements we performed in-sillico analysis of
2019-nCoV with respect to all other viruses. A multiple sequence alignment between the S protein
amino acid sequences of 2019-nCoV, Bat-SARS-Like, SARS-GZ02 and MERS revealed that S
protein has evolved with closest significant diversity from the SARS-GZ02 (Figure 1).
Insertions in Spike protein region of 2019-nCoV
Since the S protein of 2019-nCoV shares closest ancestry with SARS GZ02, the sequence coding
for spike proteins of these two viruses were compared using MultiAlin software. We found four
new insertions in the protein of 2019-nCoV- “GTNGTKR” (IS1), “HKNNKS” (IS2), “GDSSSG”
(IS3) and “QTNSPRRA” (IS4) (Figure 2). To our surprise, these sequence insertions were not only
absent in S protein of SARS but were also not observed in any other member of the Coronaviridae
family (Supplementary figure). This is startling as it is quite unlikely for a virus to have acquired
such unique insertions naturally in a short duration of time.bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jan. 31, 2020; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Insertions share similarity to HIV
The insertions were observed to be present in all the genomic sequences of 2019-nCoV virus
available from the recent clinical isolates (Supplementary Figure 1). To know the source of these
insertions in 2019-nCoV a local alignment was done with BLASTp using these insertions as query
with all virus genome. Unexpectedly, all the insertions got aligned with Human immunodeficiency
Virus-1 (HIV-1). Further analysis revealed that aligned sequences of HIV-1 with 2019-nCoV were
derived from surface glycoprotein gp120 (amino acid sequence positions: 404-409, 462-467, 136-
150) and from Gag protein (366-384 amino acid) (Table 1). Gag protein of HIV is involved in host
membrane binding, packaging of the virus and for the formation of virus-like particles. Gp120
plays crucial role in recognizing the host cell by binding to the primary receptor CD4.This binding
induces structural rearrangements in GP120, creating a high affinity binding site for a chemokine
co-receptor like CXCR4 and/or CCR5.
Discussion
The current outbreak of 2019-nCoV warrants a thorough investigation and understanding of its
ability to infect human beings. Keeping in mind that there has been a clear change in the preference
of host from previous coronaviruses to this virus, we studied the change in spike protein between
2019-nCoV and other viruses. We found four new insertions in the S protein of 2019-nCoV when
compared to its nearest relative, SARS CoV. The genome sequence from the recent 28 clinical
isolates showed that the sequence coding for these insertions are conserved amongst all these
isolates. This indicates that these insertions have been preferably acquired by the 2019-nCoV,
providing it with additional survival and infectivity advantage. Delving deeper we found that these
insertions were similar to HIV-1. Our results highlight an astonishing relation between the gp120
and Gag protein of HIV, with 2019-nCoV spike glycoprotein. These proteins are critical for the
viruses to identify and latch on to their host cells and for viral assembly (Beniac et al., 2006).
Since surface proteins are responsible for host tropism, changes in these proteins imply a change
in host specificity of the virus. According to reports from China, there has been a gain of host
specificity in case 2019-nCoV as the virus was originally known to infect animals and not humans
but after the mutations, it has gained tropism to humans as well.
Moving ahead, 3D modelling of the protein structure displayed that these insertions are present at
the binding site of 2019-nCoV. Due to the presence of gp120 motifs in 2019-nCoV spike
glycoprotein at its binding domain, we propose that these motif insertions could have provided an
enhanced affinity towards host cell receptors. Further, this structural change might have also
increased the range of host cells that 2019-nCoV can infect. To the best of our knowledge, the
function of these motifs is still not clear in HIV and need to be explored. The exchange of genetic
material among the viruses is well known and such critical exchange highlights the risk and the
need to investigate the relations between seemingly unrelated virus families.
Conclusions
Our analysis of the spike glycoprotein of 2019-nCoV revealed several interesting findings: First,
we identified 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike glycoprotein that are not present in any
other coronavirus reported till date. To our surprise, all the 4 inserts in the 2019-nCoV mapped tobioRxiv preprint first posted online Jan. 31, 2020; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
short segments of amino acids in the HIV-1 gp120 and Gag among all annotated virus proteins in
the NCBI database. This uncanny similarity of novel inserts in the 2019- nCoV spike protein to
HIV-1 gp120 and Gag is unlikely to be fortuitous. Further, 3D modelling suggests that atleast 3 of
the unique inserts which are non-contiguous in the primary protein sequence of the 2019-nCoV
spike glycoprotein converge to constitute the key components of the receptor binding site. Of note,
all the 4 inserts have pI values of around 10 that may facilitate virus-host interactions. Taken
together, our findings suggest unconventional evolution of 2019-nCoV that warrants further
investigation. Our work highlights novel evolutionary aspects of the 2019-nCoV and has
implications on the pathogenesis and diagnosis of this virus.
References
Beniac, D. R., Andonov, A., Grudeski, E., & Booth, T. F. (2006). Architecture of the SARS coronavirus
prefusion spike. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, 13(8), 751–752.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1123
Biasini, M., Bienert, S., Waterhouse, A., Arnold, K., Studer, G., Schmidt, T., Kiefer, F., Cassarino, T. G.,
Bertoni, M., Bordoli, L., & Schwede, T. (2014). SWISS-MODEL: Modelling protein tertiary and
quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Research.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku340
Bosch, B. J., van der Zee, R., de Haan, C. A. M., & Rottier, P. J. M. (2003). The Coronavirus Spike Protein Is
a Class I Virus Fusion Protein: Structural and Functional Characterization of the Fusion Core
Complex. Journal of Virology, 77(16), 8801–8811. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.77.16.8801-
8811.2003
Chan, J. F.-W., Kok, K.-H., Zhu, Z., Chu, H., To, K. K.-W., Yuan, S., & Yuen, K.-Y. (2020). Genomic
characterization of the 2019 novel human-pathogenic coronavirus isolated from a patient with
atypical pneumonia after visiting Wuhan. Emerging Microbes & Infections, 9(1), 221–236.
https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1719902
Chan, J. F. W., Lau, S. K. P., To, K. K. W., Cheng, V. C. C., Woo, P. C. Y., & Yuen, K.-Y. (2015). Middle East
Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus: Another Zoonotic Betacoronavirus Causing SARS-Like Disease.
https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00102-14
Chan, J., To, K., Tse, H., Jin, D., microbiology, K. Y.-T. in, & 2013, undefined. (n.d.). Interspecies
transmission and emergence of novel viruses: lessons from bats and birds. Elsevier.
Corpet, F. (1988). Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Research.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/16.22.10881
DeLano, W. L. (2002). The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.1. Schr{ö}dinger LLC.
https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2014.17
Du, L., Zhao, G., Kou, Z., Ma, C., Sun, S., Poon, V. K. M., Lu, L., Wang, L., Debnath, A. K., Zheng, B.-J., Zhou,
Y., & Jiang, S. (2013). Identification of a Receptor-Binding Domain in the S Protein of the Novel
Human Coronavirus Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus as an Essential Target for
Vaccine Development. Journal of Virology, 87(17), 9939–9942. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01048-
13bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jan. 31, 2020; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Edgar, R. C. (2004). MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.
Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340
Elbe, S., & Buckland-Merrett, G. (2017). Data, disease and diplomacy: GISAID’s innovative contribution
to global health. Global Challenges. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.1018
Kirchdoerfer, R. N., Cottrell, C. A., Wang, N., Pallesen, J., Yassine, H. M., Turner, H. L., Corbett, K. S.,
Graham, B. S., McLellan, J. S., & Ward, A. B. (2016). Pre-fusion structure of a human coronavirus
spike protein. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17200
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C., & Tamura, K. (2018). MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics
analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution.
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
Li, F. (2016). Structure, Function, and Evolution of Coronavirus Spike Proteins. Annual Review of
Virology, 3(1), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-virology-110615-042301
Murakami, T. (2008). Roles of the interactions between Env and Gag proteins in the HIV-1 replication
cycle. Microbiology and Immunology, 52(5), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1348-
0421.2008.00008.x
Ou, X., Guan, H., Qin, B., Mu, Z., Wojdyla, J. A., Wang, M., Dominguez, S. R., Qian, Z., & Cui, S. (2017).
Crystal structure of the receptor binding domain of the spike glycoprotein of human
betacoronavirus HKU1. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15216
Snijder, E. J., van der Meer, Y., Zevenhoven-Dobbe, J., Onderwater, J. J. M., van der Meulen, J., Koerten,
H. K., & Mommaas, A. M. (2006). Ultrastructure and origin of membrane vesicles associated with
the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus replication complex. Journal of Virology,
80(12), 5927–5940. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02501-05
Zhou, P., Yang, X.-L., Wang, X.-G., Hu, B., Zhang, L., Zhang, W., Si, H.-R., Zhu, Y., Li, B., Huang, C.-L., Chen,
H.-D., Chen, J., Luo, Y., Guo, H., Jiang, R.-D., Liu, M.-Q., Chen, Y., Shen, X.-R., Wang, X., … Shi, Z.-L.
(2020). Discovery of a novel coronavirus associated with the recent pneumonia outbreak in
humans and its potential bat origin. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.22.914952
Zhu, N., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Li, X., Yang, B., Song, J., Zhao, X., Huang, B., Shi, W., Lu, R., Niu, P., Zhan, F.,
Ma, X., Wang, D., Xu, W., Wu, G., Gao, G. F., & Tan, W. (2020). A Novel Coronavirus from Patients
with Pneumonia in China, 2019. New England Journal of Medicine, NEJMoa2001017.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jan. 31, 2020; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Fig.S1 Multiple sequence alignment of glycoprotein of coronaviridae family, representing all the
four inserts.bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jan. 31, 2020; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Fig.S2: All four inserts are present in the aligned 28 Wuhan 2019-nCoV virus genomes obtained
from GISAID. The gap in the Bat-SARS Like CoV in the last row shows that insert 1 and 4 is very
unique to Wuhan 2019-nCoV.bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jan. 31, 2020; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Fig.S3 Phylogenetic tree of 28 clinical isolates genome of 2019-nCoV including one from bat as a host.bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jan. 31, 2020; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Supplementary Fig 4. Genome alingment of Coronaviridae family. Highlighted black sequences are the
inserts represented here.
Clearly you do not understand the difference between a genetic sequence and a virus particle. Rather than waste your time sequence gazing why not devote a little time to understanding the pseudoscientific fraudulent way those sequences were generated?
Hi Sam, do you know what a viral protein is? Do you consider the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein as a viral protein? If so, then you should know that once that protein has been developed (gain-of-function) its infectivity etc is only theoretical and they need a way of releasing it to test in a population. What is the most effective way of releasing it into the population? By including that viral protein in a vaccine and injecting it into people.
So you will have worked out that what happened with SARS-CoV-2. The basic steps were:
1. Modify a coronavirus in a laboratory (using gain-of function).
2. Test the new virus works as hoped in a laboratory using e.g. humanised mice (mice that have been genetically modified so they have human cells on their lungs). Repeat steps 1 and 2 until you think you have a virus that’s working the way you want it to work. (With SARS-CoV-2 this process took about 20 years, judging by the coronavirus patents filed.)
3. Release it into the population to see what it does (e.g. release it in a wet market which will provide cover for the virus’ origins).
4. If it doesn’t perform as hoped (i.e. spread or kill as hoped) then implement plan B more than was already planned for.
5,. Plan B is a psychological operation to give the appearance of a new (novel) deadly coronavirus to make people “volunteer” for a vaccine.
6. Distribute the genetic code worldwide via computer (in silico) and inform vaccine manufacturers the disease causing agent is the spike protein so they know which viral protein to use. Make a vaccine that includes a synthetic version (adjusting the genetic code to make sure it works better, i.e. modified RNA or modRNA) of the virus using viral protein enveloped in a lipid nanoparticle or an adenovirus.
7. Duping people into allowing them to inject the synthetic virus into them by calling it a vaccine.
8. Job done, you have now infected billions of people with the virus originally developed in a lab and modified to, e.g., suit the mode of infecting people.
You see, there was not only “a” virus but several versions of it. Each vaccine manufacturer developed their own version of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (in silico) to add to their vaccine. Perhaps over time each manufacturer developed further versions for dose 1, dose 2 etc?
What I’m summarising here is not rocket science, it doesn’t require complicated arguments about science or changing terminologies to suit a narrative or sound more knowledgeable than any one else. You don’t need a degree in one of the sciences to work it out. It is basic common sense. Anyone with a thinking brain can work it out. That’s the beauty of the human mind, we have all been given critical thinking to enable us to survive – all we need to do is use it.
You also don’t need science papers, law degrees or any other formal qualification to work out why they would put out a conflicting narrative (such as “there is no virus”) to stop people working this out for themselves and to avoid prosecution.
Is the “there is no virus” narrative being run by the deep state? I don’t know, but its a PsyOp being run by the same people who ran the covid PsyOp, that has become clear and has been clear for sometime. And you are one of those who has fallen into the trap they set.
As you are well aware i am a qualified biomedical scientist with 35 years experience. I did 8 years of diagnostic virology. The origin of the spike protein is unclear. What is clear is that no particle that meets the definition of a virus was ever purified.
Since you do not seem to understand what a virus actually is i will clarify the definition for you. A virus is a particle consisting of a genome surrounded by a protein coat. It is replication competent and causes disease by spreading from person to person. Show me the evidence for any of that. You won’t because the evidence does not exist.
You constantly conflate the issue of the shots and the supposed pandemic virus. Nobody is doubting that the shots are lethal and were fully intended to be lethal. It is impossible to modify a coronavirus in the laboratory because you cannot modify something that does not exist in the first place.
It’s not rocket science to understand the fraudulent techniques used by virologists. It doesn’t require complicated arguments just a basic grasp of logic. It is basic common sense. Anyone with a thinking brain can work it out. All you have to do is read the methods section rather than just blindly believing what virologists claim to be true.
Absolute nonsense that accepting the truth about fake viruses helps anybody avoid prosecution. On the contrary it should lead to even more prosecutions. Your belief in the fake virus lets those responsible for the iatrogenic murders during the “first wave” off the hook because presumably you think the non existent virus caused those deaths?
I have not fallen into any trap. I fully understand the virus fraud and if everyone did then they would never be able to get away with performing another scamdemic. You are not helping. You are pushing the deep states limited hangout story. Weird how you now seem to trust what the MSM and intel agencies are pushing.
Hi Sam, you say, “As you are well aware i am a qualified biomedical scientist with 35 years experience.” There are many scientists involved in the covid scam and developing vaccines that harm and kill. So why wouldn’t they also be involved in protecting themselves and their colleagues being outed?
You say, “Absolute nonsense that accepting the truth about fake viruses helps anybody avoid prosecution. On the contrary it should lead to even more prosecutions.” That’s not true and you know it. You have skipped steps 1 and 2 entirely with your narrative, without which none of this could happen. The people who develop these viruses – the viral proteins if you like – in the first place do not exist in your mind. They are therefore free to keep doing what they are doing if people follow your narrative. So you think they would find what you say as useful to their cause, jobs, freedom?
You know as well as I that covid is not the first virus they have developed (bioweapon) nor is covid the first virus they have injected into people. From the very first – Edward Jenner – vaccines have contained viruses. Why? Because this is the most effective way to make people sick, inject viruses into people.
You also know that covid will not be their last – they are working on more viruses as we speak. Why are viruses, in particular, the weapon of choice? Because they change our genome, they always have. To them they have found “the solution” – and it is biomedicine and related fields that are producing that “solution” for them.
Now, why, as a “qualified biomedical scientist with 35 years experience” would you want to deny what they are doing and so protect these people? How long have you known about the biomedical racket they’ve been running (e.g. causing disease to make money from the treatments)? Have you been involved in or got insider knowledge about making any of these bioweapons and so are implicated in the racket? Do you have friends or employers who have been involved in making or distributing these bioweapons? When ever you try to use your “qualifications” as if you have some sort of authoritative knowledge that no one else possesses, and you push a particular narrative hard – these questions spring to mind.
Whatever is really going on in “gain of function” labs it is certainly illegal and immoral. Could be money laundering or they could be working on toxic jab technology so they should certainly not be “free to keep doing what they are doing”. They most certainly would not find what i say “useful to their cause, jobs, freedom.”
You have once again demonstrated that you do not understand what a virus is and you have once again failed to provide the evidence that i asked for.
Edward Jenner injected cowpox pus into people. The modern equivalent is to inject decaying cell culture material into people. No virus in any of it. Once again provide some proof. Should be easy enough right?
I have been aware of various biomedical rackets for about 20 years and i have frequently blown the whistle. I will not protect any corrupt people at all.
The answers to your stupid “bioweapons” questions are no and no.
You are spreading the narrative that viruses do not exist and purposes of gain-of-function is questionable. This sort of dangerous denial of what they are doing, if you convince enough people, allows them to keep doing what they are doing. The narrative you push is most certainly useful to them. In fact so useful, it is obvious that it is the perpetrators – those who are modifying, stand to gain from and are using viruses for their agenda – who are driving the “there are no viruses” narrative.
PS. For those who turn to the “there are no viruses” belief because they are afraid of viruses: There is little to be afraid of. We have been living with viruses since time immemorial. Colds and flu, for example, do not kill people. It is pneumonia that kills, not colds and flu. And so far, ignoring the ill effects of when viruses are injected and so bypass our bodies’ defence systems, the only affect man-made viruses seem to have had is to give people flu-like symptoms. Avoid the vaccines, maintain a healthy lifestyle and you should be okay. Take vitamin D and vitamin C supplements if you feel unwell or if you need them. There are also anti-virals such as ivermectin and hydroxycholorquine (+ Zinc) should you feel the need.
Again absolutely no evidence provided to substantiate any of your scientifically illiterate claims.
Interesting, and revealing, comment from you …. again.
Dear Sam,
I would like to interview you for my upcoming book. You can contact me via FB. I’ve tried to contact you before on here but it was deleted or lost. Regards, Colin Edge (Retired UK Police Inspector)
Virus E? Il dott. Drosten tedesco sul suo documento dato all’OMS dice in assenza di isolati virus, abbiamo nella GenBank europea sequenze della vecchia SARS, quindi nessun nuovo virus, truffa, un raffreddore passato covid….
As a shock to no one, there is no evidence of virus isolation in the link provided by Ms. Nass. Just the usual mixture of monkey and people DNA with whatever was in the sick guy’s lungs plus antibiotics and other garbage. Ms. Nass, in case you read this (you won’t) can you please give me a reasonable explanation for why there was no excess death recorded anywhere on Earth before lockdown measures? I’ll go first: BECAUSE THERE WAS NO SPREADING VIRUS. THE LOCKDOWN MEASURES CAUSED THE SPIKE IN DEATH. There is no other reasonable explanation for the death spikes happening only after lockdowns. Do you think the virus spread (and you must believe it spread because positive “tests” were everywhere), but somehow waited for lockdowns to start murdering people? That’s dumb Ms. Nass. If you do have an explanation for the mortality data, I’m listening. Otherwise stop promoting pseudoscience.
Covid was only ever “isolated” in a computer simulation. It takes an extreme level of disingenuousness to claim that the powers that shouldn’t be like the ‘no-virus’ evidence. The proven fact that there is no virus completely destroys their entire narrative. It’s the ‘gain of function’ narrative which was trotted out on the Stephen Colbert show by the likes of Jon Stewart, and which consistently gets mainstream play. Use some discernment.
Wow. Talk about not actually addressing the issue. Former Pfizer Chief Scientist Mike Yeadon continues to give international governmental expert testimony encompassing the irrefutable science as to ‘why’ the virus (as Dr. Sayer Li also suggests) is more the corruption of cells (exosomes) under severe stress or toxicity. The toxicity can come from previous pharmaceutical, environmental or ingested food and water. But oddly- the COVID ‘symptoms’ are nearly identical with radiation poisoning. Isn’t it interesting that COVID coincided with the rollout of true 5G.
YES – there are biolabs. I suspect they are working as much on the programming of the nanotech (hydrogels, graphene oxide, etc) which are now appearing worldwide in BOTH the vaxxed and unvaxxed. (See Dr. Ana Milchea and Dr. David Nixon substack).
Additionally, the entire cabal mafia is built on control through fear. If indeed there wasn’t some microscopic/invisible boogeyman that could infect/harm/kill you without warning – they would loose their #1 method of control. No – the Deep State is TERRIFIED at the truth that our sickness comes from food, water, chemtrails, radiation instead of a ‘virus’. Bacterial infections (not he same as a virus) are bad but not enough since natural remedies like colloidal silver, garlic etc can overcome almost all of them.
All very tedious this.
You’d think by now all in the so-called truther movement would have learned that viruses exist in name only.
Science falsely so called. 1 Timothy 6:20.
There was no virus. The pcr test was used to generate fear and as most of the commenters on here know who Kary Mullis was and what he said I don’t need to elaborate…suffice to say that he mentioned that after 24 cycled you get total garbage and I know from an FOI request that the NHS were running 40 cycles. Additionally, Brighton Eye hospital tried to pressure me into taking a convid test and I refused. They asked why and when I said convid was a hoax they said they weren’t allowed to discuss it, which is odd…surely they would be keen to persuade me otherwise…but no.
Hi Reverand Scott,
The PCR test kits were contaminated with Graphene Oxide, along with the masks.
I was refused entry to a UK hospital for not taking a PCR test.
The Egyptians used to push rods up unruly prisoners noses, to puncture the brain.
Several people have died through taking the PCR rod up their noses.
Yes. I have examined some test swabs and they had little black dots on, which fits with what you say. Sticking something so far up someone’s nose is the height of stupidity isn’t it.
Hi Rhoda,
Another complicated article.
In the UK our coins are made out of steel.
People were sticking coins onto their arms, at C19 jab site.
The C19 fluid has Graphene Oxide in it.
The GO takes iron out of the blood and makes a magnet.
When a few of these magnets are made, they stick together to make a clot.
These clots can block veins and arteries, causing sudden death.
Athletes, Football and Rugby players, Cyclists, Weight lifters and Pilots, who pump more blood are most at risk.
According to the CDC no covid virus has been isolated.
https://principia-scientific.com/hhs-documents-show-cdc-has-not-isolated-any-covid-19-virus/
Nass has it wrong. Big pharma loves HER position because it keeps the fear lever about viruses engaged. Fear is Satans favorite tool.
All of those isolations you mention exist insilico only. They all use the same software and compare to the same previous computer generated models to confirm. You and Meryl need to read some scientific papers to learn about the ridiculous methodology behind this. Its a snake chasing its tail.
https://secularheretic.substack.com/p/interview-with-dr-tom-cowan-4a9
Monkey kidneys, calf serum and antibiotics…..virology is more like witchcraft than science I think…
In the article – “If this No-Virus theory is so easy to debunk, why does it keep popping up? I am starting to wonder if it isn’t a psyop, repeatedly inserted into the discourse to stop people from looking into the true origin of the virus … looking into the funders of gain-of-function research on coronaviruses at NIAID and elsewhere … and looking into what exactly they were trying to do and for whom”
In the article – “Do you see how denying the existence of a virus plays into the globalists’ hands?”
Are you a Globalist?
No, I’m a retired farmer in Arizona.
Why are you participating in the Nass/big pharma Hegelian dialect to promote a needless fear of viruses? Do you work for big pharma?
“All those years ago, Dr, Nass confirmed that the virus is real…” She couldn’t confirm it, because it’s not true. ‘Genome sequences’ are at best in silico…aka…made up, created. Contagion of respiratory illness has never been demonstrated.
In the article – “Do you see how denying the existence of a virus plays into the globalists’ hands?”
Are you a Globalist?
Hi Rhoda, I have been reading and learning much from your informative articles since 2020 and have donated to the Expose to help support it. In general, I love your articles and think you are doing a wonderful job exposing the many false narratives of the establishment and I thank you for your service to humanity. However, none of us are perfect and this latest article by Dr. Meryl Nass (titled “The deep state loves the “no virus” narrative”) and your commentary are full of misunderstanding and misinformation. The truth is that the deep state LOVES the virus narrative–that’s exactly what they use to convince everyone to take the poison injections!
Though I know you mean well, you are inadvertently aiding and abetting this nefarious agenda by publishing the ignorance of the wrong “experts” and promoting the existence of imaginary viruses. I urge you to use your brilliant investigative skills to look deeper into the very astute arguments made by many doctors including Dr. Kaufman, Dr. Cowan, Drs. Sam & Mark Bailey, Dr. Jordan Grant, Dr. Michael Yeadon, Dr. Stefano Scoglio, Dr. Ana Mihalcea, and particularly Stefan Lanka, the virologist whistleblower who singlehandedly destroyed the entire foundation of virology by actually doing the control experiments that virologists have neglected to do for many decades and conclusively proved that the cytopathic effect in the cell cultures used by virologists to prove the existence of viruses was actually caused by the unscientific methodology of the virologists themselves by first starving and then adding various poisons to the cell culture.
Virologists fraudulently refer to what is actually a soup of ingredients as an isolated purified virus, as if a chemical soup that contains human snot mixed with antibiotics, fungicides, fetal bovine serum, monkey kidney cells, trypsin, DMEM, etc. is an isolation of anything! Read the methods section of all those 1,500,000 alleged “isolations” you found and you’ll see that they all falsely use the word “isolation” to refer to what is actually a “soup” of biological and chemical components, NOT an actual isolated/purified virus. And, by the way, it’s ludicrous to think that one can property sequence a virus when its theoretical existence is only one component of many ingredients in a cell culture. No doubt that’s why there are so many (475,000?!) existing genome sequences and probably none of them are the same. Please take note that Christine Massey (Fluoride-Free Peel) sent FOIA requests about proof of isolation of SARS-CoV-2 to 225 institutions in 40 different countries and not one of them could provide it.
Not only have these pseudoscientific virologists who butchered the scientific method by not using control experiments never truly isolated any virus, they’ve never followed Koch’s Postulates (which requires an isolated virus), nor scientifically proven that any (never-isolated) virus has ever actually made anyone sick. Do you really think that causing the CytoPathic Effect using poisons in a petri dish is adequate proof that viruses exist and cause disease? One don’t need to be virologist to recognize that this is bad science. Dr. Meryl Nass may criticize Dr. Kaufman for not being a virologist (even though he just does a better job of explaining what Dr. Stefan Lanka–an actual virologist–has exposed), but Dr. Nass is not a virologist either and clearly hasn’t even taken the time to adequately explore and understand all the irrefutable points that Dr. Kaufman or Dr. Lanka have made. She has made numerous false claims and logical fallacies that don’t at all prove the existence of any virus but I will resist the temptation to debunk them all in this commentary.
The degree of corruption that the Rockefellers have had on modern medicine and the medical power structure they instituted cannot be understated and it sure as hell can’t be trusted. The disproven germ THEORY and patented drug-based allopathic medical industry that treats symptoms rather than causes is full of bad $cience, incorrect assumptions, and false paradigms, as one should expect since it’s all based on profits more than healing. There’s a good reason why doctors and the drugs they prescribe are the leading cause of death in the world so it’s definitely time for all of us to start being a bit more critically minded about all the fake science we’ve all been indoctrinated into believing–like fake viruses, fake variants, fake isolation, fake virus genome sequences, fake virus tests, fake pandemic, fake face mask protection, and fake vaccines. The medical rabbit hole is far deeper than you and most other people realize. Our ignorance about viruses and germs is being used as a weapon against us so please devote more time to studying this subject and stop propagating the albeit common but unscientific idea that invisible viruses are out to get us so we need to inject ourselves with poison and other toxic drugs in order to save ourselves. Thank you!
You say “you are inadvertently aiding and abetting this nefarious agenda by publishing the ignorance of the wrong “experts” and promoting the existence of imaginary viruses”
In the article – “Do you see how denying the existence of a virus plays into the globalists’ hands?”
You are you are aiding and abetting this nefarious “viruses don’t exist” agenda.
Sorry Garth but, like the authors of the article, you have that completely backwards! Our ignorance about microbiology and fear of fake lab-created viruses is the most important tool that the globalists possess and exploit to trick the masses into accepting a global medical police state/dictatorship, mass surveillance under the guise of safety, and mass murdering themselves by voluntarily injecting themselves with deadly nanoparticles of graphene oxide. Until people wake up and see past the psy-op deliberately clothed in technical jargon to obfuscate the fake science, the people of every country will be controlled in the name of fighting one new fake variant after another–the perfect cover story for the globalists to solidify their control and, with the help of the “Pandemic Treaties”, use the power and authority of the WHO to control all nations, just as the Rockefellers and their fellow globalists intended when they created this diabolical international organization.
I’ll add a reminder that the burden of proof is on those making the unfounded claims that viruses exist and cause disease.
Hi Jamey Scott Breinberg, if you’re desperate for proof, you don’t have to wait for someone else to provide it. You can easily prove it for yourself by injecting yourself with e.g. the ebola virus and see what happens. Please isolate yourself from others when you run your experiment, you may not believe viruses exist but you never know what might happen. I’m sure Tom Cowan, Sam Bailey, Stefan Lanka, Mike Yeadon et al will help you source a virus (there are numerous viruses available, from several outlets/labs, to purchase online for research purposes) and will be happy to provide medical and/or scientific supervision/support so your experiment can be run safely and responsibly, and the results properly documented. In fact, I’m very surprised that Andrew Kaufman, Sam Bailey, Tom Cowan and Stefan Lanka haven’t already done this, injected themselves with a virus to prove they don’t exist. Why do you think they haven’t done this? Is it too risky, too dangerous perhaps?
To everyone else, please DO NOT inject viruses into yourself or anyone else – IT IS too risky and too dangerous – including allowing virus vaccines to be injected into you or injecting virus vaccines into others.
How is it possible to inject yourself with something that does not exist? Cell culture supernatants obtained from dying cells are available to purchase online not purified “virus”. Only a fool would inject themselves with that toxic junk.
Hi Rhoda, thanks for your reply but, with all due respect, your challenge makes no sense. Why do you think that doctors who assert that viruses don’t exist would be able to help me find a real virus to inject? Just because someone patents or claims to be selling an alleged virus, “purified viral lysate” (which, by the way, is NOT the same thing as a purified/isolated virus), or uses a computer to create a theoretical genomic sequence, does NOT mean the virus must be real. Though viruses themselves are imaginary, all the various poisons and DNA from all the different animal species that virologists routinely add to the cell culture are 100% real so it would not be wise at all for anyone to ingest and at least a hundred times worse to inject.
So why would you be surprised that the aforementioned doctors haven’t already done such a pointless experiment? Even according to the official narrative, Covid isn’t being spread by people injecting the “virus” but by people breathing the airborne “viral” particles. I would be more than happy to participate in an experiment that involves being in close proximity to people with any alleged virus and forced to breathe the same air in the same room. In fact, I actually proposed it years ago when I was still on Facebook.
Though the symptoms of what they call “Ebola” are downright horrifying, I can assure you that I would have absolutely no fear at all of being in an enclosed room full of patients diagnosed with Ebola, however I would have tremendous fear of living in the villages where the patients who allegedly contracted this fake virus live. Why? Because though Ebola is believed to be a virus (even though the pictures of it resemble a worm-like parasite) thanks to the sloppy pseudo-science of virologists who neglect to do the necessary control experiments, the terrifying symptoms are most likely the result of chemical poisoning (which creates an environment conducive to parasitic infestations), much like polio and Zika.
The virus has served as a great cover story for governments and corporations who want to avoid billions of dollars in liability payments. Once you understand the basic mistake being repeatedly made by virologists, you won’t have any fear of viruses either. If you take the time to at least study the control experiments done by Dr. Stefan Lanka, I’m confident you’ll be able to see through the bullshit just as I have.
Hi Jamey Scott Breinberg, you can find viruses to purchase for research purposes online. I’m sure Sam Bailey, Tom Cowan, Stefan Lanka, Mike Yeadon etc will be able to help you out.
You say, “Once you understand the basic mistake being repeatedly made by virologists, you won’t have any fear of viruses either.”
This is a typical mantra of the “no virus” PsyOp to keep reinforcing that viruses are to be feared.
Why does the “no virus” camp reinforce the fear of viruses? For the same reason the “pandemic” camp reinforces it, fear is used to manipulate people’s thoughts and behaviour. The problem you have is the same as the covid pandemic PsyOp: you can only fool some people and for only some of the time.
The two PsyOps – pandemics and “no virus” – are being run by the same people. The covid pandemic PsyOp is well understood now, only a minority of people (I don’t know how many but say, 10-20%) still believe the e.g. covid pandemic was real and fear viruses, as you put it. So, how do I avoid falling into the “no virus” PsyOp? I don’t fear viruses so I don’t have to close my eyes and pretend viruses don’t exist to make myself feel better.
I must of course end with a warning, avoid the vaccines, ALL vaccines, because they contain the viruses and by injecting viruses into people they have a much higher success rate of making recipients ill etc.
You can purchase cell culture supernatants from decaying cells online NOT purified “viruses”. Provide the evidence if you think i am wrong. Your argument that the “no virus” people “keep reinforcing that viruses are to be feared” is completely bonkers and makes no sense what so ever.
Well, Rhoda, I completely agree that all vaccines should be avoided. NOT because they contain the very same viruses they are claimed to protect us from, but because they all contain potent neurotoxins and a long list of other POISONS! I understand it’s difficult for non-virologists (even doctors) to understand how virologists go about “proving” that “viruses” exist and it’s hard to imagine that so many intelligent people are all deceiving themselves, so the instinct to assume they know what they are talking about is understandable. However, the Emperor wears no clothes. Once the procedure they use is broken down in plain English so that mere mortals can understand it, it becomes completely obvious that they have NEVER isolated any virus, just as renowned virologist Stefan Lanka and all the other doctors I mentioned have explained over and over again.
You seem to think that just because they fraudulently use the word “isolate” that it means they actually isolated it but no, it’s always in a soup full of toxicants. What they’re actually observing is the breakdown of poisoned cells and stupidly assuming that it’s because of a virus rather than because of all the poisons they added to the petri dish. I don’t think I can make it any clearer than that. I’ll ask you once again, do you really think that causing the Cytopathic Effect by using poisons in the petri dish is, by itself, adequate proof that viruses exist and cause disease?
I really don’t understand why you keep insisting that the same doctors who deny the existence of viruses will be able to help me find viruses for sale online. Where is the evidence that what these virus salesmen are selling actually contains a real purified/isolated virus? Even the salesmen of the “purified viral lysates” are not making such a claim. I also have absolutely no idea why you think the very people pointing out that there’s no evidence that any viruses exist are somehow reinforcing the fear of viruses or are the same ones responsible for the pandemic Psy-Op. As if all those doctors I mentioned are somehow the enemy promoting the narrative that the virus is fake but the pandemic is real. That’s profoundly illogical and makes no sense whatsoever! On the contrary, their denial that viruses exist is precisely the reason they are being persecuted by the establishment
These same clowns that go along with the government narrative then at the same time they themselves know the government lies. They stick their heads out they get sued then they step right back into the government propaganda.
There is NO COVID-19 and there are no viruses.
Scottish Government “NO” Scientific
Evidence of any Bird flu Virus exists
https://substack.com/redirect/38d0b756-46bf-486a-bdd5-1473564b0f75?j=eyJ1IjoiMXdic3o0In0.ZfSSS3fg-YtirVhyXlZvs-VcyOCpkwq2FwphyMMr01Y
Scottish Government confesses to having no scientific evidence of any bird flu virus
“we cannot provide information which we do not hold”
Christine Massey FOIs
https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/scottish-government-confesses-to?publication_id=992044&post_id=157492612&isFreemail=true&r=1wbsz4&triedRedirect=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
In December of 2024, James Hendersen filed a freedom of information order for records held by the “Chief Veterinary Officer (Scotland)”. He sought all studies/reports, authored by anyone, anywhere:
describing isolation /purification of the alleged H5N1 or any other alleged bird flu virus, directly from a sample taken from a diseased bird, and/or
wherein experiments were carried out to test for natural transmission of purified “virions” to healthy humans or animals.
James asked that if any records match the above description and are available to the public elsewhere, he be provided enough information about each one in order to identify and access it (title, author, etc.).
On January 27, 2025, Chris Bain acting as “AHW : Disease Control” responded on letterhead labelled “DIRECTORATE OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL ECONOMY” / “Scottish Government”; reference number 202500448083. He explained that:
“…the Scottish Government does not have the information you have requested…
…the Scottish Government is not required to provide information which it does not have. The Scottish Government does not have the information you have requested…
…we cannot provide information which we do not hold.”
Our bodies are fighting of all the freaking poisonous foods and GMO foods.
I eat Organic gluten free foods and take my 90 essential nutrients.
Everyone must stop going along with the government propaganda stop taking their money and bankrupt that system.
Now, that DOGE is chocking the system everyone must do the same.
Spot on. There’s over 200 FOI responses Christine received confirming the same thing. ICD medical coding reveals 10000s more fantasy brands with toxic life ending medicines to match.
HCQ and Ivermectin are actually anti-parasitics which do wonders on bodies toxic enough to build up micro-parasitic infestations (brought about by poor air quality plus toxic overload) in the lungs.
Asserting that there are any real “anti-virals” when viruses are merely cellular detox exosomes, has got to be the real “psy-op” here.
I just love this propaganda line being presented in all seriousness in this article:
“Properly used PPE protects the wearer from exposure.”
MASK UP! And score one for the deep state.
In regards to the line in the article:
“Here is the key argument: I have challenged those who deny covid is caused by a real virus to explain what, exactly, is causing these symptoms if it is not a virus. One suggested toxins. Or 5G.
I dispute that 5G radiation is not contagious.
Weapons expert Mark Steele said in a v1deo: ““…dangerous 5G network is then gonna hit that body and it’s gonna radiate so you’re then get what’s called a local radiator. So you’re gonna get somebody who’s had this vaccination who’s gonna be standing next to somebody who hasn’t had a vaccination and they’re gonna get sick…” (10:07)
Also, see this line in an article by cancer d0t 0rg:
“During radioembolization, the radiation source stays near the tumor. The radiation travels a very short distance, so the effects are mostly to the tumor. However, you may have to limit contact with other people for up to one week after treatment. It is especially important to avoid close contact with children and women who are pregnant…”
Now, if radiation can’t be passed on from one person to another, why are people who receive radiation advised to limit contact with other people for up to one week after treatment?
Dr. Nass also says:
Interesting that the quote above about radiation mentions limiting contact with other people for up to one week after treatment.
One week is close to 6 days…
So I’m not sure about her argument refuting the 5G theory…
CBS News: Autism & Transgender Linked to Vaccines (JABS)
Autism & Transgender Linked to Vaccines (JABS)
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/family-to-receive-15m-plus-in-first-ever-vaccine-autism-court-award/
Transgender vaccine injury, what other dysphoria could vaccines be causing?
Last year Rogers wrote a “foundational article” article showing that sex dysphoria is a result of vaccines, in short, it is a vaccine injury.
https://expose-news.com/2024/06/29/trans-is-a-vaccine-injury/
• Robert Kennedy: Big Pharma admits their JABs vaccines cause 405 diseases including Autism & Diabetes
https://twitter.com/redvoicenews/status/1612055955235287040?s=20&t=EBLim0PsU1XhjtSSvgkGNg
Jab Cause Autism, Study Proves Intentional Gene Deletion
https://stewpeters.com/show/cerebral-organoids-in-jab-cause-autism-study-proves-intentional-gene-deletion/
Todd Callendar: mRNA JABs illegal Ownership Of Humans (World Patent Office) PCR Test Linked To Human Cloning
https://www.banned.video/watch?id=657be3236e59a8d5ba46a57f
Todd Callender: updates legal battle on Ownership of Humans using mRNA JABs.
He goes into detail on how this all started who the people are and his fighting the government for Ownership of Humans
https://www.banned.video/watch?id=66076c57b0f994f1e4d1cd24
AIDS – The True Story
https://expose-news.com/2023/01/27/aids-the-true-story/
AIDS myth is kept going by describing patients in Africa who have tuberculosis as suffering from AIDS.
It was a trial run for covid-19 – the rebranded flu.
US Supreme Court: Pfizer, Moderna OWNs You If You Get The JABs.
The case of Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980)
https://principia-scientific.com/us-supreme-court-pfizer-moderna-may-own-your-genes-if-you-get-jab
[…] Fuente Expose […]
Dick Cheney: Pentagon To Create Race Specific Biological Weapons to take out Citizens/Specific Ethnic Group’s
Dick Cheney: page 60 of Rebuilding America Pentagon New Century Adopted by the Pentagon.
* kill Target: Blacks & Whites
* Doesn’t target: Chinese or Jews (Ashkenazi)
Dick Cheney: page 60 of Rebuilding America Pentagon New Century Adopted by the Pentagon.
Starting @ 20:10 – 22:00 minute mark.
https://banned.video/watch?id=64b99e126d90d9096dee2d4a
[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]
FDA’s Top Vaccine Cheerleader Peter Marks Forced Out — Told to Resign or Be Fired
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/fdas-top-vaccine-official-peter-marks-forced-told/
I think what Dr Nass is not appreciating is the fact that pcr tests ‘find what you tell them to find’. If you want to see if the genome of the ‘supernatant’ is the same as c19 then you need to find a 30K base pair match. Also, can Meryl please show me the paper that scientifically shows that transmission is a thing? Thx
What’s the point for deep state to love the “no virus” narrative when they need the otherwise to get people jabbeb in the poison Vax?…the Virus Narrative has always been the actual deepstate goals since it is their agenda to cause disease in healthy people…
The greatest misconception that keeps most confused is the difference between “direct observation” and “indirect observation”
ALL so called evidence provided wrt the existence of viri is by way of indirect observation !
I don’t comment very often, but this has to be one of the most obvious push an agenda article this begger newspaper has ever posted. the people that want you to believe it exists never question the method of isolation and its failures! utter tripe
oh it worked on wikipedia why am I not surprised!
“Beggar newspaper”? That is OTT-far from the truth.
Hi Islander, like a number of the comments under this article, the profile is a troll. The aim of a troll is not to make reasonable or sensible remarks. If they’re not pushing a narrative (i.e. the latest propaganda or PsyOp), the aim is to disparage or solicit an emotional reaction. They’re time wasters who don’t have anything of value to say or contribute. The next comment the profile makes will be deleted to save us all the time.
[…] Fonte: https://expose-news.com/2025/03/28/deep-state-loves-the-no-virus-narrative/ […]