|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
For a few years, Joe Bastardi and Dr. Arthur Viterito have been testing their hypothesis that thermohaline circulation is the cause of the global warming that has been observed.
However, as Dr. Viterito says, there have been signs this year that the thermohaline circulation is weakening, sea surface temperatures are reducing and, as a result, 2025 may be a watershed moment in climate history.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Dr. Arthur Viterito, a retired professor of physical geography, has conducted extensive research on the thermohaline circulation and its impact on global climate change.
Related:
- Global Crisis: Time for the Truth, Speech by Prof. Arthur Viterito, Creative Society, 4 December 2021 (video on Rumble HERE)
- Global Crisis: We Are People, We Want to Live, Speech by Prof. Arthur Viterito, Creative Society, 7 May 2022 (video on Rumble HERE)
- More Sceptics Citing Ocean Circulation as Climate Driver | Professor Arthur Viterito, Principia Scientific, 24 April 2019
Thermohaline circulation is a component of the general oceanic circulation. It continually replaces seawater at depth with water from the surface and slowly replaces surface water elsewhere with water rising from deeper depths.
The process involves cold, dense water sinking in polar regions, particularly in the North Atlantic and near Antarctica, and spreading into the full extent of the ocean. This sinking water is replaced by surface water, setting up the circulation.
Thermohaline circulation plays a crucial role in transporting heat, nutrients and other materials vast distances, influencing regional and global climate patterns.
As we noted in a previous article, according to a 2024 study by Japanese researcher Dai Ato, sea surface temperature plays a dominant role in regulating atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) levels. As sea temperatures rise, more CO2 is released into the atmosphere. Conversely, colder water can hold more dissolved carbon dioxide so when sea temperature decreases, the ocean absorbs more CO2 from the atmosphere.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Update on Geothermal inputs and evidence of changes: ‘Showing signs of cooling’ temps – ‘2025 may be a watershed moment in recent climate history’
By Joe Bastardi, a meteorologist and chief forecaster at WeatherBell, as published by Climate Depot on 14 April 2025
I have been working with Dr. Arthur Viterito over the past few years in an alliance that combines what I am observing in having to forecast the weather on a global scale every day and what he is gathering from what may be a significant cause of warming that is being observed.
I have found a great deal of resistance to this from both sides of the climate issue. I make no claim that I have to be right about this. All I am trying to do is make sure there is also a public place where you can see this and perhaps at least wonder about it. It’s not like “outrageous” ideas in many things have not, with time, been shown to be true, Given the natural resistance from those wishing to push the climate catastrophe issue, which is directly in line with a whole litany of issues they have deceived the public on in other matters: (Just a few examples: Russian Collusion, Hunter Biden laptop, Biden’s mental acuity, Covid, Social media censorship to impact an election. Feel free to add to the list), so if we find out this has merit it would join the list.
It is huge because it does put an end to the idea that man-made impacts on climate are the driver (although there are other reasons to believe they are not). And, of course, some of the resistance from my side is if it ends the debate, no more books, arguments or being able to claim you were the reason this was discovered. But all I am doing is trying to make sure, despite the vitriol that is hurled our way, that I keep you updated on this.
Dr Viterito writes:
As I reported a short while ago, the preliminary data from the Global Centroid Moment Catalogue (“GCMT” or “Quick Catalogue”) are showing a sharp downturn in mid-ocean seismic activity for this year (1/1 through 4/13). As I’ve also discussed, less mid-ocean seismic activity indicates less intense geothermal flux along mid-ocean ridges and rises, and this should cause the thermohaline circulation to weaken. In turn, thermohaline weakening results in the following:
- Reduced heat storage in the Indo-Pacific and Western Atlantic Warm Pools.
- Weakened western boundary currents.
- Reduced heat flow into the Arctic, diminishing the Arctic Amplification. [Arctic Amplification is the phenomenon where the Arctic region is warming at a faster rate than the rest of the world. The loss of sea ice is one of the most cited reasons for this acceleration.]
We are starting to see signs of these phenomena unfolding. As for the Info-Pacific Warm Pool, the most recent maps from Climate Reanalyzer (slide 1 in the attached PowerPoint*) and NOAA’s Operational Forecast maps (slide 2) clearly show a decline in SSTs [sea surface temperatures].
[*Note: There is no PowerPoint attached. We assume the slides being referred to are the images below.]
(Graphics are from ClimatereAnalyzer.org, NOAA and the DMI (Danish Meteorological Institute)
These two warm pools serve as “capacitors” for the Kuroshio (North Central Pacific) and Gulf Stream Currents (North Atlantic), and we see significant temperature declines for each of these currents (slides 4 through 6). The Greenland Current is also showing signs of cooling (slide 7).
Indirect evidence of a reduced Artic Amplification can be seen in the snow cover graph for Greenland (slide 8). Here we see a trend towards greater snow cover, commencing with a noticeable jump in January of this year.
Although VERY early in the cycle, these events have all the earmarks of an inflection point. If the trend continues, I have a feeling that 2025 may be a watershed moment in recent climate history.
Right or wrong, I applaud our subscriber base’s patience with me putting this on despite what has been vitriolic pushback in some circles, even from my side of the AGW [anthropogenic global warming] debate. It’s not like we have not seen that in other matters, climate etc, and with time, the truth comes out.
So, dear reader, we may be approaching the time over the next decade when the test of the idea gives us an answer. I do not know how someone truly looking for the answer would be opposed to that unless they had other motives.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
I very much appreciate this. Much better to UNDERSTAND climate issues than to seek refuge in ideological preconceptions. My own viewpoint changed when I I actually did the easy math on CO2 and realized that the difference in CO2 IN THE ATMOSPHERE between 425 parts per MILLION and 350 parts per MILLION was a minuscule .0075%! However that AHA! does not negate the effects of incinerating much or the earth’s rainforests, huge monocropping, industrial pollution contamination, and above all the hugely documented aerial spraying! The later has been amply documented over 20 years by geoengineeringwatch.org and the groundbreaking documentary THE DIMMING. (free online) I hope this comment will be relayed to the author
Ocean
s currents cycles (60-68 years) are well known.1970s we were going to ice age. Then oceans switch to “man made global warming”.
Now it´s going to be new ice age time, again.
It´s going to be very interesting to see how “they” make this “man made”…
Some 5 years ago one could get reasonably accurate information even from sites such as NASA, and it was clear that for SST’s (Sea Surface Temperatures) if you were tracking El Nino and La Nina changes in the Pacific, that the information was accurate enough to show that global warming was an absolute lie. Such science was more a-political then. The sun spots generally were less far less in number for a time but when more eventually appeared they were weaker. The sun clearly has its own seasons and the establishment was projecting the exact opposite of what was going on. The oceans absorb a lot of energy in different ways from the sun and temperatures have been monitored virtually everywhere for well over 60 years. What has been happening since is a concentration of wealth and power into fewer and fewer hands. As knowledge when widely distributed is “power to the people” such that they can make rational decisions to govern their lives, we see more and more suppression of it to us, with more and more massive deceptions and total lies from our governments and the ruling establishment.
What I meant was not 5 years ago but some 15 years ago.
Hi Rhoda,
I have followed Dutchsinse, who operated in the US, for some years now.
He has showed by satellite images how they create the weather over the US.
So, it follows, they can do it in other places.
[…] Original Article: The Exposé […]