Shadow Equalities Minister Claire Coutinho has strongly criticised Labour’s plan to introduce a state-sanctioned definition of Islamophobia, warning it could grant grooming gangs “impunity” and intensify a “culture of censorship” that hinders necessary discussions on issues like Muslim grooming (rape) gangs, gender equality and Islamist extremism.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
The move to draw up an official definition of “Islamophobia” stems from a working group set up by Angela Rayner over the summer to advise on “appropriate and sensitive language” around discrimination against Muslims.
Rayner recently quit as deputy prime minister, but the group’s work continues under Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government Steve Reed.
Keir Starmer is set to deliver a major speech at the Labour conference this week, pledging a “progressive fightback” against the “decline and division” fuelled by the “far-right.” He is expected to use his address to outline a strategy for rejecting division and hate, positioning the government as a leader in the fight against “far-right” extremism and its impact on communities, including Muslims, which heightens concerns that he will be pushing the concept of making “Islamophobia” illegal further.
In an article published last week, The Times reported that a legal opinion given by Tom Cross KC concluded the formal definition of “Islamaphobia” being prepared by ministers may end up influencing sentencing and hampering the work of the police and security services.
In the biggest challenge yet to Labour’s definition of “Islamophobia,” The Telegraph reported earlier this month, Jonathan Hall KC, the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, said he was against an official definition of Islamophobia because it was “directed” at a religion rather than protecting people from anti-Muslim hatred.
Hall warned that any “spongy or inaccurate” definition would threaten freedom of speech in the face of a likely “overzealous” enforcement of it by police and other authorities.
The Times quoted Lord Young of Acton (Toby Young) of the Free Speech Union, who warned: “We have put the government on notice that we won’t hesitate to bring legal action if it rolls out an official definition of Islamophobia. We have various laws that protect people of faith from harassment and discrimination and state agencies whose responsibility it is to advise public bodies on how to interpret and apply those laws. Any attempt by the government to trespass on the jurisdiction of these agencies would be unlawful.”
“If Labour pushes this definition through … no one will be able to criticise grooming gangs, Islamist extremism or political Islam without breaking the law and being branded Islamophobic. That’s a direct threat to free speech, public safety and honest debate,” a former Conservative MP told the Conservative & Reformer Post.
Shadow Equalities Minister Claire Coutinho has accused Labour of attempting to rig the consultation process by initially limiting public input, only allowing it after she exposed the restricted access.
Coutinho said the definition, pushed by “radical activists,” would give Muslims a “special status” above other groups, potentially breeding resentment and worsening community cohesion. She suggested the move is politically motivated, aiming to appease pro-Palestine and pro-Gaza candidates ahead of the next election, rather than genuinely tackling anti-Muslim hate.
She has called on Reed to scrap the definition entirely. “This is nothing but a cynical attempt to give special protections to one group in society … The new secretary of state must scrap this dangerous and divisive definition,” she said.
Related:
- Angela Rayner to promise a new definition of Islamophobia, Free Speech Union, 3 March 2025
- Activist advising Rayner over Islamophobia definition sparks conflict of interest row, The Telegraph, 21 July 2025
- UK government effort to define Islamophobia reportedly delayed, JNS, 16 August 2025
- UK ‘faces social unrest’ if Labour pushes ahead with Islamophobia definition. The Times, 25 August 2025
- Blue Labour Peer Urges Keir Starmer To Drop Plans For Islamophobia Definition, Politics Home, 28 August 2025
Featured image: Steve Reed, taken from ‘Labour’s shadow justice secretary Steve Reed personally intervened in the case of a violent thug facing deportation from Britain’, Daily Mail, 10 May 2023 (left). Keir Starmer at the Labour conference in 2022. Source: The Guardian (right).
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, UK News
What we need is a government definition of “Far Right”
That’s easy – all who don’t subscribe to government propaganda!
Hi Rhoda,
Claire Coutinho is on the side of justice.
There should be one Law and only one Law.
The Law is complicated enough, without having laws for different people.
When in Rome, do as the Romans do.
In other words, if you are in the UK, abide by our Law.
Good in theory, Dave, but its getting harder to know exactly what “our law” is these days!
Hi Islander,
Have you watched this Andrew Bridgen video yet ?
https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=259912
Any legislation favouring one group over others is bound to breed total enforced control, rebellion by natives, destruction of cohesion, loss of trust both in government and in ‘other’ groups, division and eventually giving birth to violence whether by way of revolution or worse – genocide.
Reminds me of the whole ‘God’s chosen people’ nonsense, personally if God is favouring one of his works above all others and based on available information about his character He can kiss my a@se. Genocidal, psychopathic child loving freak who thinks he is God.
This is running the risk of creating another brand of ‘God’s chosen people’ making the police et al powerless to do anything when theres a legitimate reasons for doing so.
People have every right to fear this “Islamic Invasion By Design”. Engineered by WEF and constructed using ulterior motives. Islam is dangerous and divisive – that’s the point. Phobia? Be afraid, be very afraid. But don’t waste your fear on phobias, conquer your fear and fight back bravely. Penetrated politicians are a bunch of tossers, so toss them out! … and Deport Islam.
There is no law! there is only contract.
Government refuses to disclose its legal position, that means all legislation created by government holds no authority or jurisdiction over anyone.